No, Eric, it doesn't reboot.
In fact, I have put the NM 2V on my 3660 router also and same problem
occurs!
Thanks,
Sujal
- Original Message -
From: Erick B.
To:
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: NM 2V [7:33166]
When the problem occurs, does the router reboot
Hi.. I tried to establish a ISDN-BRI connection between the two routers,
one in Singapore and one in Jakarta. In Singapore we are using switch type
basic-net3 and our ISDN card in singapore router is with S/T interface
connected to NT1 and Jakarta side , the switch type is basic-5ess and the
Good idea, keep up the good work Paul.
Cheers
George
--- Paul Borghese wrote:
Due to the recent concern with SPAM I have changed
the posting procedures
for this group. If you post from the Discussion
Board on
www.groupstudy.com, this will not effect you. Those
who post from the
Keith,
I agree with Mike: can you check if there is a route from 64.114.57.1 back
to 64.114.57.9 ? I would add a route on the device with address 64.114.57.1
that would look like this:
ip route 64.114.57.8 255.255.248.0 64.114.57.2
Good luck.
Regards,
Georg
Message Posted at:
Is anyone aware of increased latency from Korean networks into the US or v/v
lately?
My users in Korea are complaining of slow page loads.Traces from Chicago, IL
US to Korea show a speed bump between the last hop in the US and the next hop
in Korea.(65ms to Palo Alto CA. - 244ms from Palo Alto to
Any wirii over there? Maybe the link is flooded with MS worms.
Hotmail 2 wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is anyone aware of increased latency from Korean networks into the US or
v/v
lately?
My users in Korea are complaining of slow page loads.Traces from
Trying to get more information on VACLs. ANyone know of a URL white
papaer on VACLs?
What switches or images support VACLs?
THanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33182t=33182
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Sujal,
just to be on the safe side, here are the IOS versions that you need to
support your NM2V and your voice cards. Check if you run the right version:
3600
NM-2V=
11.3(1)T, 12.0(1)T, 12.0(1),
12.0(2)T, 12.0(2)XC, 12.0(2)XD,
12.0(3)T, 12.0(5)XK, 12.0(7)T,
12.0(7)XK, 12.1(1)T, 12.1(1),
I still don't see the need for VTP???
Have given the password thing some thought before but not sure if needed in
a smaller star topology type network. There are no other switchblocks.
A good stoning sounds awsome to me.
As far as bunnies and spanning tree I've made my core switch root
Hi all,
I have a question regarding EtherChannel. Is there an alternative to
EtherChannel that will give aggregation speeds that can be implemented on
6509's. The reason I can't use EtherChannel is that our corp policy forbids
VLAN's so hence no EtherChannel.
I have a customer who is currently
You don't need VLAN's for EtherChannel, so I don't understand the policy.
Anyways, can you upgrade to Gig Ethernet? Or, use 802.3ad if your switch
supports it.
GO PATS!!!
John McCartney wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I have a question regarding
The following is my configure of pix 525, now the nodes in the dmz can not
connect to the outside, why?
and do i have to use the NAT command to the traffic from the dmz to the
outside. It seem that the pix cant route the dmz traffic to the outside.
help me! please!
sh conf
: Saved
:
PIX Version
Your layer-3 device doesn't have a route back to the 64.114.57.8 /29 network
to return traffic back to IP adddress 64.114.57.10.
Also, when you troubleshoot what looks easy I always turn on ip classless so
you don't deal those issues. I think 12.0 IOS and up has it on by default
now.
Marc
The following is my configure of pix 525, now the nodes in the dmz can not
connect to the outside, why?
and do i have to use the NAT command to the traffic from the dmz to the
outside. It seem that the pix cant route the dmz traffic to the outside.
help me! please!
sh conf
: Saved
:
PIX Version
Please ignore my questions.
I mailed the e-mail two days ago, but got the answer a couple of hours later
from a different list. I mailed a new one with the answers the same day
informing about this, but it apparently got on the list before this one.
Thanks,
Ole
You can also use CEF, much less CPU intensive.
Dave
Patrick Ramsey wrote:
I believe as long as you have route cache disable, the router will load
balance per packet...if route cache is enabled then it goes per
destination.
Of course I have only used this config with OSPF and not static
I forgot to add that we are not using the 6509 CAT IOS we are using the box
as a big router (IOS) with many F/E ports. We do have a Gig-E card that we
just placed in one but not the other and the customer is concerned about
redundancy. I told him we could add the Gig-E to the other one but they
On R2 the biggest thing that hits me is that in your sh isdn stat your
layer one is deactivated. Heres a link that might help you!
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-layer1.html#first
Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote:
Hi.. I tried to establish a ISDN-BRI connection between the
two
Very true. And what's up with that policy regarding VLANs? Does that
make sense to anyone?
From now moving forward we will not allow any subnets on our network.
The network must be flat!!
Sounds like they're from the Flat Earth crowd. Perhaps this is the
extreme wing of Switch when you can,
If the customer is rich and has $$ to burn, by all means go get some more
gig blades, gbics and run fiber. Otherwise, EtherChannel is still the way
to go, and cheapest. Tell the tech/manager who wrote the no VLAN policy
that it doesn't apply to EtherChannel.
I hate layer 8 of the OSI..
John
I know its a stupid policy, but I have to live by unless I find some other
gig but in this economy good luck. Thanks for your input.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33197t=33187
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Don't have them handy but I had looked at them for curiousity a while
back when they came out but have never had a need for them. The VACL
keyword on CCO wil give you you fill.
Dave
bergenpeak wrote:
Trying to get more information on VACLs. ANyone know of a URL white
papaer on VACLs?
Channeling does not require trunking
Dave
John McCartney wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question regarding EtherChannel. Is there an alternative to
EtherChannel that will give aggregation speeds that can be implemented on
6509's. The reason I can't use EtherChannel is that our corp policy
It's called a port-channel in native mode
Dave
John McCartney wrote:
I forgot to add that we are not using the 6509 CAT IOS we are using the box
as a big router (IOS) with many F/E ports. We do have a Gig-E card that we
just placed in one but not the other and the customer is concerned
not commenting on the policy itself, but I'm wondering if you can explain
why the anti-vlan policy exists?
In all sincerity, I am curious as to the thought process. the why is
generally more educational than the what
Thanks
Chuck
John McCartney wrote in message
[EMAIL
Well, sort of resolved. This turned out to be a known issue with Dell
machines, specifically machines using a 3COM 3C905C NIC. They expect
the network to be available almost immediately upon bootup and can't
handle the delay caused by spanning tree. In some cases, even portfast
did not reduce
Thank you Thomas. Can you further comment on the specific cards that you
bought for the switch chassis? Can anyone comment on what parts are used in
the Network Academy 550 switches?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Crowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002
Those DELL's with the 3com nic's have so many problems! There's a thread
over in comp.dcom.sys.cisco with someone else having problems with the same
PC's and NIC's.
Usually the 3c509's are OK. I remember the 3C509B's as being rock-solid.
How fast are the PC's booting to beat portfast? Or are
I meant 3c905b's are nice. I think the 509's are old ISA cards.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Those DELL's with the 3com nic's have so many problems! There's a thread
over in comp.dcom.sys.cisco with someone else having problems with the
same
Chuck and C0.,
The policy may be in place in order to curtail some of the innate security
flaws that VLANS allow for in network architectures. I have document
(somewhere on this laptop), that explains the pros/cons of utilizing VLANs
specifically from a Secure Architecture perspective. If
I was just discussing this with one of the LAN guys here and it sound
like the problem is with the Novell client and some service it expects
to be running before a user logs in. If the network is unavailable and
that service doesn't start in time and then a user attempts to log in,
the PC
I am still having nightmares about the 509's - they were nasty. However,
with the portfast on my 3548 interfaces, I have not had any problems with
the about 40 Dell's we have with 3C905B's.
The only big problem I have with Dell computers (but I have that with some
other ones too), are the
I wonder if these cards would have problems with 3Com switches
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203]
When I ran into the problem with 3Com NIC's in new Dell, the solution was to
download a driver/maintenance disk from either Dell or 3Com, and make it
bootable. We then went into the hardware configuration of the NIC and
disabled power management and WakeOnLan.
-Original Message-
From:
I don't think the issue is the switch, but the fact that spanning tree
is running. I would guess that any feature that causes the network to
be unavailable when one of these machines boots up would cause this
problem. In fact, it happens even if you're not connected to the
network at all.
I got my ccnp and cisco mail me a certification diploma and a wallet size ,
certificatin with my number on it ,and i lost it can i get another one?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33214t=33214
--
FAQ, list
Has anyone read the Cisco Secure PIX Firewalls by David W. Chapman Jr.? I
have no experience with PIX yet and need a good book to give me a
foundation. I don't trust the reviews on Amazon and feel I could get better
input from y'all.
Thanks alot
sam
Message Posted at:
Dandi,
If you want to use CiscoWorks, you must have DNS server. It can be
on the same box as campus manager, for testing purposes, but in
production network you should put it on separate box. CiscoWorks
takes lot of resurces.
You only need one host in zone file, the host where CiscoWorks (and
Closest thing I know of is the Feature Navigator -
you tell it which features you need, and then tell it what platform and
feature set you want. It will then tell you which IOS versions support it.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN1.pl?HStartForm2=True
- Original Message
Hello,
I was attempting to use a 6509 with a 1750 in the router on a stick scenario
until my MFSC arrives. I have done this several times in the past with other
switches and have been successful but the 6509 will not allow me to route
between my two VLANs. The configuration on the 1750 was
At 10:57 AM 1/25/02 -0500, John Neiberger wrote:
Well, sort of resolved. This turned out to be a known issue with Dell
machines, specifically machines using a 3COM 3C905C NIC. They expect
the network to be available almost immediately upon bootup and can't
handle the delay caused by spanning
There are a ton of errors with 3Com NICs that have been addresses by loading
the latest driver from 3Com. See
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html#NIC for the details.
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:17 PM
Subject: RE: 2924XL and
All,
I have been on CCO looking for documentation on the AS line of products
trying to see if you can do call tracking with the AS5300/5800. My company
is considering purchasing this for outbound calls from the desk and a
backup to our vpn solution.Does anyone know if they will do call tracking
It is a policy from our IP-Eng group, can't find it in writting but they
tell me it exists. I think because they like to have control. Oh well.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33222t=33187
--
FAQ, list archives,
Yes,
On the cisco tracking system, email cisco and ask them to please re-send you
certification pack.
I had to do this as I never got my ID card the first time round.
Phil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33223t=33214
but they were stable!
Steven A. Ridder 01/25/02 11:13AM
I meant 3c905b's are nice. I think the 509's are old ISA cards.
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Those DELL's with the 3com nic's have so many problems! There's a thread
over in
Actually,
It's not just spanning-tree that causes it...
Are you familiar with set port host? It's a macro in newer CatOS.
In addition to enabling portfast on a port, it also disables channel
and trunk negotiation, with is enabled by default. On older CatOS
code, you have to perform each of
Sam,
The book is pretty much a direct port from the CSPFA 2.0 class. The new
class, 2.1, is now out and it does have some minor changes. One that I
remember is that 2.0 talks a lot about WebSense but 2.1 doesn't.
I was somewhat disappointed with this book, considering that the MCNS book
was a
What does your configuration look like?
-junovtv
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33228t=33217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
I have the book and I also attended the PIX course he teaches for Global
Knowledge. I think the book covers everything it needs to, but even if it
didn't, it's the only game in town.
- Original Message -
From: sam sneed
To:
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:40 AM
Subject: Cisco PIX
I learned PIX from the book which comes with the PIX itself. Have you read
it yet? It really explains everything in details with examples. Try if you
haven't read it.
AA
-Original Message-
From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:37 AM
To:
Hello,I was trying to follow the redistribution lab b/w rip and ospf from
the ccie lab guide by Hutnick and Saterlee. On pg. 586, ospf is configed
on RTC with a default-metric of 64 while rip with 2. With this command,
it works...meaning I can see all the rip learned routes on RTD which is
Remember, the metric on ospf is cost, the metric on rip is hops.
You always need a seed metric when redistributing, I can't explain why the
ospf continues to run, but thats what rip wo't work. Its the same with
EigrpIGRP, no metric, no work.
Message Posted at:
The 2924XL isn't a CatOS switch. Do you know if it has the equivalent
command? I was under the impression that a switchport on a 2924XL was
an access port by default and had to be manually set to be a trunk port
of any sort.
Is that not correct? I'll need to check into that as well.
Thanks,
It was a little confusing to me also while reading the new practical studies
book, he does state that without a default metric or metric specified in the
redistribution statement the redistribution won't work, and while this is
true with most protocols, I have never had to specify one, default or
Hello,
I have a Cache Engine running IOS ver 2.31 and router 7204 running IOS =
ver 12.1(2)T
The systems are connected as shown below
I need to know how can configure the cache engine to manage the web =
traffic of my 3 providers.
Regards,
Ing. Joseba M. Izaga K=FChn
Gerente de
sure mail me a check payable to Patrick Ramsey for $90.00
Your cert will be in the mail
george gittins 01/25/02 12:30PM
I got my ccnp and cisco mail me a certification diploma and a wallet size ,
certificatin with my number on it ,and i lost it can i get another one?
Message
I haven't tried it but I would think it should work just fine. I had a
problem once though on a 7200 where ISL wouldn't work, similiar to what
your seeing. Tried dot1q and it worked fine. Try the inverse.
Dave
Mike Lynnette Keller wrote:
Hello,
I was attempting to use a 6509 with a
Hello,
I have a Cache Engine running IOS ver 2.31 and router 7204 running IOS ver
12.1(2)T
The systems are connected as shown below
Provider 1Provider 2
Provider 3
| |
|
| Up/Down
I would also recommend using the inverse. I've tried it with ISL and it
worked but couldn't get dot1q to. Good luck!
-junovtv
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33242t=33217
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I don't think there is an equivilent IOS command and yes it's an
access by default, VLAN 1 of coarse!!
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
The 2924XL isn't a CatOS switch. Do you know if it has the equivalent
command? I was under the impression that a switchport on a 2924XL was
an access port
Tony,
Okay, you are accesing it remotely? You can successfully access it on a
Win2k
server from your client browser, but not on the Sun box. This probably rules
out any NAT/Routing/Switching/physical layer problems.
I would take a look at the config on the Sun box.
Anyone remember that
When metric is not supplied, and there is no default metric, then routes
redistributed into RIP will have a metric of 16 (unreachable), routes
redistributed into IGRP will have a metric of -1 (unreachable), and routes
redistributed into OSPF will have a metric of 20.
CM
- Original Message
gee, and my customer happens to have a 3com NIC. whaddaya know!! ( he
has a generic PC, but what's sauce for the goose... - guess I will tell him
to try an Intel NIC )
Chuck
John Neiberger wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, sort of resolved. This turned
I guess this is a reminder once again to start troubleshooting with the PHY
and MAC layers. Excellent link. Thanks.
Priscilla
At 05:10 PM 1/25/02, Mike Mandulak wrote:
Nah! They have their problems as well. You just need to load the latest NIC
driver and check their settings. Just read the
I found out that we do have the most recent drivers so it's either a
feature to be fixed later or we just need to tweak the settings. Our
LAN people are going to do some more testing and I'll let you all know
what they find.
John
Mike Mandulak 1/25/02 3:10:49 PM
Nah! They have their
I know it used to be the case that you couldn't connect to the ANI server
for the first 5 minutes or so.
Not done much with it for 18 months now and this was with CWSI 5.2 (from
distant memory) so not sure if that's the case now.
I rebuilt a few times before finding this out. Waited 5 minutes and
I thought redistribution into any other protocol besides OSPF would have a
metric of 0. 0 is not understood by EIGRP, IGRP or RIP and therefore won't
work. Redistribution into OSPF always assumes 20 unless you specify
otherwise.
Charles, could you site your source? I'm concerned that I may not
Some of the most common problems that we ran into while converting from a
hub to a switched environment (in no particular order) were NIC drivers out
of date, auto negotiate failures (hard coding the speed/duplex if the switch
and nic usually fixed that, alignment errors on the switch were
That's interesting, I work at Intel and we test our nics and drivers here in
the lab all day. I would be willing to help out anyone who are having
problems with their Intel nics.
John, what version of the Novell client are you using?
-junovtv
Message Posted at:
Hey gang,
I have a connection from a 3002 Hardware Client to a 3005 Concentrator. I
have configured many 3005s but this is my first 3002 connection. I set it
up as per CCOs configuration. The tunnel comes up but I can't see anything
on the 3005 network. Also PAT is configured on the 3002 and
I have checked individual switches and routers for utilization before but
when asked what the average utilization of an entire network (mainly LAN)
is, what exactly makes up this figure? I am working on getting a packet
sniffer which I know will help take all the variables and give me an answer
Hey gang,
I have a connection from a 3002 Hardware Client to a 3005 Concentrator. I
have configured many 3005s but this is my first 3002 connection. I set it
up as per CCOs configuration. The tunnel comes up but I can't see anything
on the 3005 network. Also PAT is configured on the 3002 and
Are there any differences between Cat 3900 and 3920 TR switch in term of
functionalities?
Ed
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33259t=33259
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hello,
I am having a routing problem and am hoping someone can point me in the
right direction. Thanks in advance.
Lab Setup:
- I have a pair of 2501's (R1 and R2) hooked up via the serial ports.
(10.0.1.1 and 10.0.1.2)
- The eth0 port of R1 is connected to a switch with 5 PCs and a Cisco 675
to those folks that replied about the above problem about the 6260 DSlam
and the 7200 series router and the other layer 3 device you were right
about the other device not knowing about the routes...the other device
is a Nortel Shasta and I dont like fooling with the shasta as its a tad
unstable
Dont know how the 675 reacts, but as you are using classless IP addressing
and subnet zero, it would be worth checking that you have:
ip subnet-zero
ip classless
Not sure on the 675 whether you would be stopped from entering the subnet
zero address if this were not configured, and not sure
Hi group,
I have a VoIP environment with 10 gateways. The calls are being
routed between these gatewats and evrything is working fine. The
problem is that I want to limit the number of calls on per gateway
basis, that is for example gateway A should only have only 10 active
calls from gateway B,
At 06:36 PM 1/25/02, Doug Korell wrote:
I have checked individual switches and routers for utilization before but
when asked what the average utilization of an entire network (mainly LAN)
is, what exactly makes up this figure? I am working on getting a packet
sniffer which I know will help take
Hear Hear - good job!
--
James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP
Sr. Network/Security Engineer
non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem
William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
George Dodds
Sent: Friday, January 25,
h.323 gatekeeper. Or callmanager.
Hamid Ali Asgari wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi group,
I have a VoIP environment with 10 gateways. The calls are being
routed between these gatewats and evrything is working fine. The
problem is that I want to limit the
Don't have our Adtran handy, but IIRC the only difference between
ours and yours is we have two V.35 cards and an 8 port POTS card
to simulate Modem dialup.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy
Daniel Cotts wrote:
Thank you Thomas.
I am so shy to find that is the global and interface command. Sorry to
bother all of you. Phillip Gu wrote:
What i know about IPX EIGRP is that if when send SAP over
EIGRP, it is increment sap update? Am I right?
And the other question is what is the deferent between ipx
1. How do your inside users get out? There is no global command for
inside. You should test that first before you work on the DMZ stuff. It's
a little easier to get working and it verifies that you know how to
configure NAT/PAT.
2. I don't think this is a problem, but I would match your nat
A few quick thoughts that might be messing this up.
You have no default route for your DMZ. If you planned on having
the DMZ map back to the outside properly, your global does not indicate
so. Also, you do not seem to have any globals which match the nat ids for
the dmz.
At 09:35
Can't see anything wrong. Have you done a 'clear xlate', and if necessary a
reboot?
Otherwise can't see anything, as long as IP config is OK on devices on DMZ.
Gaz
cage wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The following is my configure of pix 525, now the nodes in the
Two important rules about PIX. Any outside traffic or I should say any
traffic from the lower security to the higher security, you must have static
and conduit commands. And any traffic from higher security to lower
security you must have global pool and nat depends if you are doing
translation
you're ping_acl is only allowing icmp traffic.
cage wrote: The following is my configure of pix 525, now the nodes in
the dmz can not
connect to the outside, why?
and do i have to use the NAT command to the traffic from the dmz to the
outside. It seem that the pix cant route the dmz traffic to
Your access list for the dmz interface (ping_acl) only allows icmp
traffic. The implicit 'deny any any' at the end is stopping your traffic.
As a side note - it's a bad idea to post configs with passwords - encrypted
or not - to any public forum. Which this is.
Good luck...
Berry
At 09:35
no, they both run the same code. only difference is with physical port
count and physical port expandability. 3900 has 20 fixed ports and two
modular slots, whereas the 3920 just has 24 fixed ports. Let me know if you
need a 3900, I have a couple left.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS /
Does your outside router have a route to DMZ network:
IP route 202.99.33.0 255.255.255.0 210.82.34.29
Gaz
cage wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The following is my configure of pix 525, now the nodes in the dmz can not
connect to the outside, why?
and do i
I have just installed Cisco ConfigMaker v2.5.1 It is pretty good software
for newbies. But the tutorial part the standalone flash exe file is not
working. It gives me an Visual C++ Runtime Library Error every operating
system that I tried. What should I do ? Thanks for interested.
Message
On Jun 16, 9:41pm, Mike Sweeney wrote:
}
} LOL- you have those nice people too? We threatened one guy with a very
} public stoning after he did something like that.
Just tell him that he won The Lottery; see
http://www.mostweb.cc/Classics/Jackson/TheLottery/
}-- End of excerpt from
Hi guys,
Could somebody explain what is the meaning of interface reset? Does it mean
the interface is having a problem if the reading is high or it means
something else?
Thank in advance
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share
94 matches
Mail list logo
