Remove the autonegotiate configuration for the ports.
Set the desired 10/100 full/half duplex manually.
I have experienced the same above solution worked, and
learnt this events were symptons of some vendor auto
negotiation mismatch.
regards,
Jiten.
--- Patrick Ramsey
wrote:
funny you
Kent, Irwin,
This is an interesting exchange of perspectives. Could you
or someone else comment on GMPLS? How does it factor into
the comparison of MPLS vs. FR? Is there anything about the
combination of MPLS / GMPLS that gives it an advantage over
FR?
Another issue I'd like to understand in
Hi,
Need Help in understanding why the following problem is occuring.
When I connect the CISCO 2600 router through the console port. I get the
following error message
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/network-confg (Timed out)
%Error opening tftp://255.255.255.255/cisconet.cfg (Timed out)
Thanks to everyone who helped clarify the VTP Domain process and I have
more questions.
I am working on a textbook Cisco network design. We have two 6509s in the
core, four 6509s in the distribution layer and about 30 6509s at the
access layer. We also have two Server Farm 6509s hanging off
Dear all
I configure an AS5300 cisco access-server for core
dump, sending the core files on a Linux ftp server. My
problem is that the core files that are greated, are
too big 190MBytes (Suppose to be around 4Mbytes) and
are not readable. By viewing the files i can only see
random characters..
Hi all - I've been searching around the Cisco website and
elsewhere with google, but can't quite pin this down. I
have a 1003 with no flash card in it, which currently is
just booting image c1000-rboot-r.103-9
When the machine boots there's no sign of the ISDN interfaces.
I read on an earlier
The router is looking for a config file on a TFTP server
by broadcasting messages. You can disable this behaviour by
no service config command.
HTH
Hi,
Need Help in understanding why the following problem is occuring.
When I connect the CISCO 2600 router through the console port. I get the
Hi,
I have a CISCO 2500 series router and last time there was a power problem
due to which now everytime I boot I get the following message
System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10 C), SOFTWARE
Copyright (C) 1986-1996 by Cisco Systems
2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
Local Timeout
Hi Nathan,
with a DTE/DCE cable between the two serial ports you can even make one of
the routers a frame relay switch. If you want the config for this, let me
know and I'll send it to you.
Regards,
Georg
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39136t=39112
Hi Stanzin,
with CIC you mean Cisco Info Center ?
What do you need to know ?
Regards,
Georg
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39137t=39104
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Dear All,
I would first thank you for your worthfull contributions which enable me to
solve the problem! The problem was that the interfaces is set to full duplex
(10full or 100full commands), and when i change the configuration to 10base
and 100base the problem has been solved totally !! I'm
Danny,
I had this same problem but with 2600 series routers.
I loaded an IOS that supported the featurs I needed but DID NOT support the
interfaces physically present on the box.
It threw me a bit as well.
Do a hardware/Software compatability check on CCO and then look for the
images that
Here is a great reference
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CAT4003 and 3com [7:39084]
Greetings,
Any
Hi Yatou,
is your question if a WIC-1DSU-T1 card can be connected to a T1 circuit ?
Here is what I found on the Cisco site:
WIC-1DSU-T1
The WIC-1DSU-T1 card is a single-port, T1/fractional T1 CSU/DSU interface
card. Use the WIC-1DSU-T1 card for a cost effective router-CSU/DSU
combination with
Guys, If it helps any, here is a quote from Cisco's web siteLink below.
Cascaded Stack Connections:
You can connect from three to nine switches in a cascaded stack
configuration. The cascaded stack operates in half-duplex mode. (This
raises the debate about how many switches in the stack
I've had multiple experiences with 3com NIC's and Cisco switches not
negotiating speed and duplex properly. Gets to be a real pain the backside
after awhile. I've had instructors tell me the same thing, that Cisco and
3com are notorious for this issue.
Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE,
Hi,
From the Cisco web site
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fvvfax_c/vvfivr.htm#xtocid14;
The example showed that aaa authentication login
h323
group radius. The h323 is indicated in the
command
reference as the list-name. But I
I have not seen that error myself, but maybe this is what's happening
(copied from cco):
Adding the command distribute-list access-list out rip to an active IPX
ROUTER NLSP process causes the router to display the following error
message, after which the router reloads:
Local Timeout (control
Awesome Link! Thanks Tom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tom Petzold
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CAT4003 and 3com [7:39084]
Here is a great reference
This brings up another question...
Since the WIC-1DSU-T1 card can be used for N X 64 kbps or N X 56 kbps
non-channelized data rates (N = 1 to 24), is a standard T-1 (not PRI)
channelized or un-channelized? I was under the impression that since you
were dealing with 24 64Kb/s channels (get it?),
I have seen that before. If I remember correctly, the router had corrupted
memory.
Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have not seen that error myself, but maybe this is what's happening
(copied from cco):
Adding the command distribute-list
I think you would be fine just using the 2600 and a Cisco switch. This
is the focus of CCNA. Use multiple routers if you study for CCNP
routing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Nathan
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:02 PM
To: [EMAIL
Kelly,
On the GigaStack modules, are you using both ports on the module, or one
port on two modules?
Examples (use fixed font for best view):
1 module / 2 ports
switch 1 [oo] [--]
|
switch 2 [oo] [--]
|
switch 3 [oo] [--]
Jeff,
If you are going to (must) use VLANs, they should never extend beyond the
distribution layer. That is, a VLAN may exist in the access layer (possibly
across more than one A/L switch) but should terminate at the D/L. Beyond
the D/L into the core, the network is to be purely
Thanks for all the responses.
Dug the switches out today and tested.
We were all on the right tracks I think.
I also put this to the Cisco open forum, and a Cisco CCIE answered my
original question saying it was definitely not possible to run etherchannel
between two switches with 2 Gigastack
Of course, 2500 that have problems like that just get retired to door stop
duty.
Danny wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have seen that before. If I remember correctly, the router had
corrupted
memory.
Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message
[EMAIL
At 3:29 AM -0500 3/22/02, Tom Scott wrote:
Kent, Irwin,
This is an interesting exchange of perspectives. Could you
or someone else comment on GMPLS?
GMPLS does many of the things you are describing. It generalizes
MPLS setup beyond the current packet/frame oriented paths to paths
that don't
This was not very helpful James!
-Original Message-
From: Lee James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rack [7:38796]
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s)
What problems have you had with the Arrowpoint Sam?
We do mainly Foundry for load balancing, and I have to say (as I'm not using
my work e-mail address :-)) that they have been flaky as hell. We work
fairly closely with Foundry (when we can get in touch), but every box seems
to work differently
Also, go to the website w w w . c c x x p r o d u c t i o n s . c o m and
click on their Build a Home Lab link. This may help you out with some
other home lab questions.
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:02 PM
To:
Georg,
thanks for your infor. Actually my question is: can the Wic-1DSU-T1 card be
connected to a T1 circuit through a DSX-1 interface?
our T1 circuit is connected to a DSX-1 patch panel from adc.com and we can
not touch that part by just connecting the Wic card to the patch panel.
It seems
Ole,
Here is our configuration(God I hope this doesn't get screwed up. Just
in case, basically it's a looped configuration, using only one of the gig
ports per switch, utilizing the second gig port on the 1st and 9th switch
for uplink to the distribution layer. Gig0/2 on switches 2-8 are
First off, failover takes close to a minute which is a lot more than Cisco
advertises(in HA config). Second they're supposed to provide for load
balancing using SSL. This simply does not work on ours even though we
followed the config on their site exactly. Third they're very tempermental.
We
no
Aaron Shively wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone in here has taken any classes at ICTP (located
in
Anaheim, CA) or heard anything about it? I am interested in attending
there, and was hoping to talk with someone who has gone
The problem is that a PING needs access back with a PING REPLY, and the PIX
does not allow that by default.
Use the command:
conduit permit icmp any any 0
to allow PING REPLY (icmp type 0) from the outside to the inside.
If you want to use tracert also, you must add the command:
That's interesting. We've been using the Arrowpoint switch for
load-balancing with sticky SSL sessions for over a year now and have had
no problems at all.
However, we're going to be replacing that box with two of
something-or-other, we just haven't decided on what yet.
John
sam sneed
Both the VUE and Sylvan beta test systems always register a fail after
taking a beta exam. Even if you call them they will tell you the same. No
need for alarm.
Your real results will be emailed to you soon.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39165t=39127
Incidentally, you can see a picture of this configuration at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~kcobean/workstuff/pics/pic6.jpg or
http://home.earthlink.net/~kcobean/workstuff/pics/pic10.jpg
As usual, watch for URL wrap.
HTH
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent and accurate
way of finding it.
Thanks,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39167t=39167
yeah, since the move to cisoc, we no longer autonegotiate anything... Not
reliable in any since of the word... Of course if we followed my suggestion
we would be an extreme/juniper shop right now... :)
Jitendra Joshi 03/22/02 03:24AM
Remove the autonegotiate configuration for the ports.
Set
a 486 with 16mb of ram, linux, and mrtg...
-PAtrick
Rafay Aslam 03/22/02 11:25AM
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent and accurate
way of finding it.
Thanks,
Confidentiality
MRTG and any old computer running your favorite flavor of linux
Rafay Aslam wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent and
Are the CCNP exams going to a new format soon? I was talking with someone at
my testing center and they said they will be changing the format soon.
Anyone know when?
Mark Villanova
I3Mobile
IT Engineer (TX)
Main: 817-766-5000
Office: 817-766-5012
Mobile: 817-312-8955
Fax: 817-766-5001
Email:
As everyone else suggested, the free way to do it is run MRTG (
www.mrtg.org ). It can be run on Windows and Linux, better and easier to
setup on LINUX. You then configure snmp on your 2600. The machine running
mrtg will collect the snmp data and make a graph of your traffic utilization
over your
you mean something like this? This is a png of our internet connection
Use mrtg
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/
Rafay Aslam 03/22/02 11:46AM
Guys
I wanted to know traffic utilization on my T1 which is connected with a
Cisco2600 router.
?
Patrick Ramsey wrote in
All,
I agree that the industry has settled on pps. And yes, the smaller the
packet size the greater the number appears. However, if you look at the
ratio of header to payload, smaller packet sizes seem to result in lower
throughput as measured in bits or bytes. A larger packet size has a
An excellent piece of software is Concord. It uses SNMP to poll all the
intefaces on all the routers in your network and gather bandwidth usage data
from any day or time period. As weel as other useful things.
Danny
Rafay Aslam wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
HI
Hi Kelly,
So, from what we've discussed the stack is half duplex then. In fact, just
read your previous post and that's what you said. Doh!
To make it full duplex you would need another 3 Gigastack cards and keep it
to one cable per module.
And in that case, you'd probably be better changing the
I wanted to know traffic utilization on my T1 which is
connected with a Cisco2600 router.
MRTG is a freeware perl script that was written to gather router/switch
interface statistics using SNMP. It creates attractive graphs and many of
us use it to do long-term monitoring/graphing of their
I have used ttcp as recently as yesterday. I think an Enterprise IOS is
required to run it between routers. Cisco recommends that you run ttcp
through routers instead of on them. This has to do with the way the router
prioritizes traffic that it generates vs. traffic that it routes.
Beware
That's firewire between the switches, isn't it?
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Cobean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Gigastack Etherchannel [7:39033]
Incidentally, you can see a picture of this
Hey can anyone provide some sample configs for a 7206VXR Clear Channel DS3?
Also a subrate? Iv got a 7206 with a PA2-T3 card. One of the DS3's is going
to be a full 45mb the second will be a 6mb. Any caveats or heads up that I
should be aware of when bringing up these links? Anyone have an
Patrick Ramsey 03/22 11:35 AM
a 486 with 16mb of ram, linux, and mrtg...
-PAtrick
Rafay Aslam 03/22/02 11:25AM
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent and accurate
way of finding it.
I believe this will do what you are looking for. I did a little testing and
it seemed to work well:
ip prefix-list classful seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/1 ge 8 le 8
ip prefix-list classful seq 10 permit 128.0.0.0/2 ge 16 le 16
ip prefix-list classful seq 15 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
Hope that
You're right, the Cisco/Arrowpoint box doesn't do this very well,
either. We're not using SSL acceleration yet, but we're currently
redesigning that part of the network to include it. I don't know if
there are any boxes that can do URL testing easily. I believe there are
some that support
Congrats!
~d
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39189t=39110
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
Why is everyone so worried about the new exam format? Wouldn't it be
amazing if someone with a certification could actually do something? If
simulations and a new format are scaring you that bad you shouldn't even
be taking the exams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know how to reduce the number of LSA's being injected into an area by an
ABR by using the stub, no-summary command. However, area 3 LSA's are still
sent into the area (default route LSA). I know I cab stop them with
database filter, but does anyone know of another way to block all LSA's?
Hello Folks,
I need help understanding this logic.
I have Catalyst 6509 switch with 4 Vlans. I have done configuration which
is recommended by Cisco.
Here is the details.
VLAN 2 Users: Subnet 10.0.2.0/24
VLAN 3 Servers Subnet 10.0.3.0/24
VLAN 4 PBX
Has anyone ever configured IDS module for catalyst 6500 series router? I
tried browsing Cisco Website, but did not find any help in terms of
installing and configuring the IDS blade. Can someone point me to correct
link?
Regards,
Ali
Message Posted at:
Daniel,
I reread my original post and did something I've done before: Been so
involved in thinking about a problem I left out perhaps the most important
piece of info thinking that everybody would know what I was working on. I'm
not sure if that's attributable to presenile dementia or just
I've also seen this type of error, it was a flash module. I've also had
problems with one of them not being quite seated correctly, but that was
after transporting the 2500
Regards
Mike Munn
-Original Message-
From: Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 March 2002 13:59
To: [EMAIL
something? If
simulations and a new format are scaring you that bad you
shouldn't even be taking the exams
I understand what you are saying, but your comments are simplistic. There
are a lot of people out there with considerable experience and skill that
are not good test takers (a good
I need to renew my CCNP in June. I'm Looking for some direction on
preparing for the 640-519 exam? Has anyone taken this and can anyone
provide some helpful notes/tips on preparing for this exam?
--
John A. Gesualdi,CCNP, CCDP, MCSE 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Providence Journal
Daniel,
I reread my original post and did something I've done before: Been so
involved in thinking about a problem I left out perhaps the most important
piece of info thinking that everybody would know what I was working on. I'm
not sure if that's attributable to presenile dementia or just
As Cisco puts it on their web site.
The GigaStack GBIC cables are proprietary, high-data-rate cables with
enhanced signal integrity and EMI performance.
Caution Do not use standard IEEE 1394 cables with the
You are absolutely correct about the people who are not native English
speakers and the people that are bad test takers, but I don't think the
people that are complaining about exam formats fall into that category.
I am been nailed with more email about Cisco and the new exam format
than I care
I asked Nortel/Alteon how there web switches compare with Coyotepoint, this
is what they sent me. If you feel like filling in what Aeropoint can do,
feel free. I thought it was cool that it can do SSL load balancing. The
other thing about coyote only having 2 ports, ports go bad a lot on web
The real issue isnt that hands on testing is good/bad (I think its
great if you want to test me, give me a router with a problem and see if I
can fix it.). The real issue is two fold: First, the testing engine
doesnt use real IOS, its a simulator, meaning that some commands have to
You could use 'passive-interface' in the ospf config or you could choose
not to include a network statement that includes that interface. If you
need to advertise that prefix, a possibility might be to redistribute
connected.
Of course, it all depends on what you're really trying to accomplish.
To better understand why this works:
In the very first octet, the following applies:
class A addresses start with the first bit = 0
class B addresses start with the first two bits = 10
class C addresses start with the first three bits = 110
So the 0.0.0.0/1 means look for a network address
You are correct. In the post you made today you simply said that SSL
load balancing wasn't working and you didn't mention keepalives. I
thought you meant that you weren't even able to get SSL load balancing
to work correctly.
We are still using pings for keepalives which works fine if your
Yes, I just took the Cisco secure intrustion detection course and we covered
it. I think it is addressed in the Cisco Secure IDS book. Any
questions give me a hollar offline and I will help you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39206t=39193
Sounds like you are talking from your own experiences.
I purchased all 500 series material not long ago. I figured since they
just came out with the 500 series I would be good for a while.
Imagine you sat down for the SAT, and on the top of the page it said
attention, now this test is totally
I have always been advised to use Vlan 1 for management only? Just dont use
vlan 1 for users and other devices. I would use vlan 1 for the managemnet
under a different subnet than your devices. Assign the subnet for vlan1 on
your router card. Use a ip under that subnet for your SC0 interface and
would writing an access list to block 224.0.0.5 and .6 do the trick?
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blocking OSPF LSA [7:39191]
You could use 'passive-interface' in the ospf
The test covers the same material!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:39172]
Sounds like you are talking from your own experiences.
I
show interface serial
That's the most efficient method!
At 11:25 AM 3/22/02, Rafay Aslam wrote:
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent and accurate
way of finding it.
Thanks,
I have been working on putting together a simple excel
spreadsheet that lists the Cisco hardware modules and
interfaces they have and maybe a little about each
router. Does something like this already exist? If
it doesn't, I would be happy to share my chart if
anyone is interested.
You are 100% correct on the default route for SC0.
The design you have is what I would recommend. The reason I would
keep the management VLAN off of the uer VLAN is if you have a meltdown
for some reason on the user VLAN you will still have connectivity
between switches while you try to
At 12:01 PM 3/22/02, s vermill wrote:
All,
I agree that the industry has settled on pps.
Router and switch vendors use ppp to advertise throughput measurements of
packets through their devices. This is just one minor aspect of network
performance.
And yes, the smaller the
packet size the
At 01:39 PM 3/22/02, Lomker, Michael wrote:
something? If
simulations and a new format are scaring you that bad you
shouldn't even be taking the exams
I understand what you are saying, but your comments are simplistic. There
are a lot of people out there with considerable experience and
Try this.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/csids/idsm/idsm_1/10890_02.htm#xtocid189323
Also if you are trying to access the IDS blade from Native IOS try this to
get to the CLI. (BTW you need Version 12.1(8b)EX5 or latter to do this)
Router#session slot 8 processor 1
The
It means that if you isolate your managment vlan with your user's vlan then
it will help you reaching the managment interface and it totally makes
sense. But do you think that isolating your managment vlan will also help
you securing your network from hackers?
Regards,
Ali
-Original
At 03:30 PM 3/22/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 12:01 PM 3/22/02, s vermill wrote:
All,
I agree that the industry has settled on pps.
Router and switch vendors use ppp to advertise throughput measurements of
packets through their devices.
That should say pps! ;-)
This is just one
Yea, and the CCIE written and lab cover the same material too. NOT.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Meiers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNP exams [7:39172]
The test covers the same material!!
-Original
It uses the CSPM software like the standalone device.
The link to physically install it is:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/csids/idsm/idsm_1/10890_02
.htm
From the CLI, type: session
then type ciscoids and attack for user and password.
Once you're in, type: setup.
absoultly it will help for security, The thing to remember is that your
ports are default for native vlan1. You can specify a different vlan number
for your management like vlan 5. But in case of trunking mishaps/issues and
vlan pruning issues it is safer using vlan 1.
Message Posted at:
I remain confused on what problem is being solved. There needs to be
a default route for anything to get out of the area. If the goal is
to block all other non-intra-area routes, why not just make the area
totally stubby?
would writing an access list to block 224.0.0.5 and .6 do the trick?
efficient? heh Maybe it's efficient per telnet session... :) oh
yeah...that MUST be what you were talking about!
now...let's see do that once every 5 minutes (assuming you work 24 hrs a
day) and you would telnet into your router 288 times a day :)
Priscilla Oppenheimer 03/22/02
I took much harder exams in college. The Ohio State University (College of
Business).
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNP exams
Priscilla,
No problem specifically. I think we all face a customer who doesn't really
understand this stuff - but thinks they have it down perfectly. So I get
questions like: can that 3620 handle a full T3? The answer, of course,
is it depends (or perhaps the optimum response would be: ask a
While I am getting ready to take the CSPFA exam, I took on my old programmer
gloves out of my drawer, and created a small application to help myself with
the PIX commands without changing the configuration on my PIX 100 times a
day.
As I always do when I create these kind of applications, I have
Hi all,
Does anyone know where I can find a schematic design of an Ascend Pipeline
ISDN router?
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain sensitive
and private proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
There are more options than mrtg, you could use nrg with RRD Tools
Rafay Aslam wrote:
HI Guys
I wanted to know how much traffic is passing through my T1 or
how much
traffic is utilizing my T1 bandwidth. Tell me the most efficent
and accurate
way of finding it.
Thanks,
Message
If you know your stuff you have nothing to worry about. Just treat it as
any other test, and taken the necessary steps to prepare. If you can't
handle a change, maybe you should evaluate your career goals, and pay no
attention to those commercials on the radio about IT. Because change is
Darn, and I was just getting ready to ask if that was packets per pound!
Pound of what? I leave that to your imagination.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 03:30 PM 3/22/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer
Hope someone could answer this simple question.
A few months back, I was able to setup VPN on a Pix 515. I just bought me a
Pix 501 for my house. Are the VPN configs the same on a 501 as on a 515?
The software is the same version, and it appears to be the same, but I just
want to make sure
At 03:30 PM 3/22/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 12:01 PM 3/22/02, s vermill wrote:
All,
I agree that the industry has settled on pps.
Take a look at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/bmwg-charter.html.
BMWG is the IETF group that sets objective criteria for testing,
although, to
I too would look at area stub no-summary, this will only propogate a
default route and will not not allow Type 3 LSA's into your area...
Or remove OSPF and just add static routes!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39233t=39191
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
