""Wallace Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hunt,
> I guess you don't have the 203.147.154.0 route in the middle router.
> however, you have a
> defaut route in it. So, you will experience a routing loop. Check you
tunnel
> configuration as well. see the follow
I have a cisco router 3640 with 8AM for callback by PSTN.
configuration as follow:
(IOS ver.12.1.T5)
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication ppp default local
aaa authorization network default local
enable secret 5
!
username *password *
username
Yeah, I feel your pain. I'm dealing with a related issue at the moment
getting clarification on whether a Netopia SDSL router will, or will not,
form a peer IPSEC/3DES tunnel with a Cisco router. I haven't had a chance
to test yet, but I'm hearing mixed answers. It just seems to me that if a
I certainly appreciate the security risks. However, there are some
circumstances where the risks are reduced (notice I'm not saying
eliminated) by circumstance. For example, many clients are behind hardware
firewalls that allow only designated inbound traffic (forget about
tunneling at the f
Get a 2511, they are fantastic. As far as I know, just about every lab
scenario ive done has had Reverse Telnet setup as one of the first things
you do..
They are perfect for CCNP/CCIE study
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42631&t=42600
-
if you have any luck finding such an animal, let me know. I have clients who
would like to do this ( against my advice )
seriously, one of the knocks on ALL IPSec implementations, be they router,
firewall, or client, is that there are interoperability problems with all of
them.
In general, the I
I have these for sale as well. I can sell them for the same price. I
sell alot of Cisco equipment.
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Thomas Larus wrote:
> I have bought from symmic, and things have worked out well, too.
>
> Tom Larus
>
>
> ""Wow"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I hav
I don't know if anyone can really give you a truth in that, other than
someone who has collected a truely impartial survey. Even a CCIE, like
myself, cannot tell you the "average", because all I know, is maybe what I
have been able to make, and colleagues of mine.
I offer my opinion however.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: CiscoB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Part Number ??? [7:42486]
It's the same part.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco home labs: www.optsys.n
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, James wrote:
> Anyone knows if a cat3900 image can be flashed into an
> IBM nways 8272 tr switch ? The interfacts looks
> familiar to me..
No I do not believe this is possible. I think however you can flash the
2600 code into it. The IBM 8272 series is basically a Catalys
Yeah and I've tried the command on interface with bandwidth ranging from
10Mbps (Ethernet), to 40Mbps (ATM) to 100Mbps (FastEthernet) and it still
insists on limiting the 'bandwidth' parameter to 0-2000Kbps..And
you're correct, I also thought using IP RTP Priority was a 'one-liner' tha
I am assuming you mean 8601.
The OS will load on it, but wont fully boot. It has crippleware, that
checks the board id, sees thats its 82 instead of something like 39 (i am
going from memory), and halts at the end with "INVALID BOARD ID".
The ID is stored on an AMTEL 28C16E EEPROM chip, that
Depending on what you want to accomplish these boot camps can be a great way
to get the test BS out of the way. If you have some solid hands on
experience and want to get away from your daily life and be able to totally
concentrate on passing the tests, then boot camp type training can be the
way
I have the following items for sale as a CCNP/CCDP lab. I wanted to
give the group first crack at this equipment before I list on Ebay.I
am selling them as a complete package only.Please email me for
further details. [EMAIL PROTECTED] The equipment is located in
Western Canada.
In the world of OSPF, the virtual link end points are the router RID's This
is defined in the RFC.
with virtual links, the hello packet has the V bit set to 1. I believe that
the TTL of the IP packet transporting the VL hello is set to 255. In any
case, virtual link hellos are forwarded until suc
You are creating a security risk for the other end of the tunnel when you
are using split-tunneling from your client.
louieb
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Alternatives to Ci
Very good. Thanks !
""Kent Hundley"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ah yes, security through obscurity. ;-)
>
> If I would have had to guess, I would have guessed you were using one of
the
> following VPN products:
>
> 1) Cisco
> 2) Checkpoint
> 3) Nortel
>
> I
On Sep 15, 1:18pm, "Anthony Pace" wrote:
}
} ok. For instance to allow ping outbound, we would have one outbound ACL
} with :
}
} access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
}
} and another inbound with:
}
} access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply
}
} This would allow the responses to ou
On Sep 15, 1:00pm, "Craig Columbus" wrote:
}
} I've got a major complaint with the Cisco VPN client. It's not smart
} enough to differentiate local traffic/Internet traffic from VPN
} traffic. Therefore, you can't browse the Internet and your VPN network at
} the same time.
It is. How
On Sep 15, 12:40pm, "Gaz" wrote:
}
} I don't think you will see the source as echo reply. By that, I mean that
} the echo reply will only be evident in the destination. The source could be
} any port.
ICMP does not have "port"s; therefore, this statement is
non-sensical.
} Remember ICMP is
On Sep 15, 11:13am, "Anthony Pace" wrote:
}
} for instance :
}
} access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo
} access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply
}
} but not
}
} access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any
This line is completely non-sensical. The on
Thanks Anthony. When I was crawling through CCO today, I didn't see the
Safenet client available for download anywhere.
I checked out the Safenet website and can't see anywhere to download a
trial. I'll call their sales dept tomorrow and see if they can hook me
up. Unfortunately, there's no
Thanks for the responses.
I'm aware of split tunneling with a concentrator. That's not what I want.
I'm looking for something that lets me connect to any IPSEC compliant
endpoint, whether it's a PIX, a router, or a Linux box. In other words,
the client shouldn't care what it's connecting to.
Why not just implement the following feature if your clients are connecting
to a PIX/VPN Concentrator!?!
You define an access-list,
access-list SplitTunnel permit ip 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.0 192.168.x.x
255.255.255.0
Then enable the Split Tunnel feature in your VPNGROUP definitions,
vpngroup n
Have you tried split-tunneling? I think it's disabled by default because
it's seen as a security risk, but it is doable.
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Columbus"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Alternatives to Cisco VPN client [7:42604]
> Let me preface this by
I was under the same impression that "IP RTP PRIORITY" was a "one-liner"
which got you out from under having to do alot of fancy Queing if all you
needed was the ability to prioritize voice or video. Can you change the
bandwidth with the "bandwidth" configuration command to raise the RTP
ceiling?
The ICMP type specified is not related to either source or destination
address. It is not like a port, it is just the type of frame. You
could ask why the syntax is not:
permit icmp echo any any
It just isn't, possibly for historical reasons, maybe just arbitrary.
More to the point, why do ci
I cannot think of a scenario where you would use HSRP without the standby
and active interface not plugged into a switch/hub or 2 seperate switches
that are trunked. Here is an ASCII visual that may help:
65096509
\ /
\ /
-HUB/SWITCH---
When I last used the CISCO VPN solution they were reselling the SAFENET
client which did exactly as you describe. (and if your "stuff in the VPN"
was not contiguous you had to create multiple profiles within the client).
It stayed resident like a TSR and monitored all your traffic to see if any
pa
ok. For instance to allow ping outbound, we would have one outbound ACL
with :
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
and another inbound with:
access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply
This would allow the responses to our outbound pings but stop anyone from
the outside from initiatei
Good question. Also, are the two 6509s trunked together? Unless those VLAN
interfaces are trunked or both connected to each 6509 though a shared
medium, HSRP won't work and clients on one 6509 won't be routed by the HSRP
primary on the other MSFC.
What do you get when you do a 'show standby' on
Let me preface this by saying that all of my VPN experience has been either
peer-peer or client to peer with the Cisco VPN client 1.x or 3.x. Please
ignore my ignorance if I've missed something obvious.
I've got a major complaint with the Cisco VPN client. It's not smart
enough to differenti
Youre most lkely correct when y ou say that its an 802.3 with 802.2 headers.
i didn;t think of that and i wondered when id ever use that info again! lol.
anyway, im using Sniferr Pro and trying to fumble my through some x.25 and
ipx packets. all of our teller systems or still on X.25 traffic until
What did you set the default gateway for hosts on vlan2? Are you having
issues from both vlans or just vlan2?
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Panetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
I don't think you will see the source as echo reply. By that, I mean that
the echo reply will only be evident in the destination. The source could be
any port.
Remember ICMP is the odd protocol, which has to be allowed both ways through
a firewall, because the reply is a totally separate session.
Hello,
Can someone tell me if a terminal server (2509-2512) is required for a
CCNP/CCIE lab? I'm continuing to build up my lab and was thinking of buying
one soon. I read somewhere that the CCIE lab does not use reverse telnetting
anymore. Is this true or not? Right now I'm swapping the console c
The policies seem more lax in the US than in UK. I'm of the understanding
that it is frowned upon to advertise the fact that you have any specific
level of security clearance, particularly TS to avoid being targetted for
any reason.
I'm just guessing obviously, but seems like common sense.
Can yo
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Why does IOS only a
It sure sounds like your servers have enough power to handle 100 users
(dual 1333 MHz processors). But if you are really concerned about
performance, you'll want to do more investigation. The software could be
slow. As I mentioned, with a sniffer you can often pinpoint the probable
cause of sl
Thanks Priscilla for the clear and excellent presentation. The answer to
my question
("Do I fragment large data packets or not?), lies in the implementation of
the dejitter
buffer at the receiving end. You pointed me in the right direction.
dj
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> At 01:35 PM 4/25/0
Was this for Secret or TS?
thanks,
Paul
EMW_Tech wrote:
>
> I shouldn't respond to a OT thread, but FYI, I had my persoanl
> interview by
> a DSS agent back in Decemberstill waiting. Oh, the process
> began in May
> 2000.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
At 01:35 PM 4/25/02, dj wrote:
>on "slower speed" WAN links, does one have to fragment all large data
>packets if the serialization delay introduced by the WAN link exceeds
>the VoIP codec packet update interval?
>
>As an example, a 1500 byte data packet has roughly about a 23 msec
>serialization
Same routes via both connections. this is our border router, no other
routing on the inside.. We're probably receiving default routes.
BGP router identifier 65.196.X.X, local AS number 7046
BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3
2 network entries and 2 paths using 242 bytes of m
When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual
gateway? Since implenting it in my test environment I can not resovle DNS
and surf. I am using 1 cat 6509 each with an MFSC here is a sample of my
test conf
MFSC #1
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.8.1.2 255.255.255.0
no ip
When adding hsrp does my default gateway become what is now my virtual
gateway? Since implenting it in my test environment I can not resovle DNS
and surf. I am using 1 cat 6509 each with an MFSC here is a sample of my
test conf
MFSC #1
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.8.1.2 255.255.255.0
no ip red
for instance :
access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo
access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply
but not
access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any
Anthony Pace
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42590&t=42590
--
I had this same problem on a connection and what I found was the other end
was set at 56 and my side was default at 64. Went I set the line speed to
match all was well.
interface serial 0
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 speed 64
or
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24 speed 56
http://www.cisco.c
The riverstone stuff is excellent.
Brian
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Kevin Campbell wrote:
> i was curious if anyone is familiar with riverstone and what your opinions
> are.
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
> a name of winmail.dat]
I'm buying / sell
No, you'll need to use a router if you need this capability
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Audy Bautista
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Inside Interface - Secondary IP? [7:42567]
Is it
If you have a CCO logon, on Software Center go to LAN Switching, then
Cat5000, then archived Sup images. You will find 2.4(5) and 3.2(4) among
others. Let's hope that was enough padding:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/cat5000-suparch
> -Original Message-
> From: Drew [mailto:[
Sorry I am late to post on this.
AGS+ is going to be alot more inexpensive than a 2522/2523.
However, personally, I would go with a 4500M, which is a *very* fast
router for lab use, and later on can support fastethernet and atm modules
as well.
4500M with 4-port serial (NP-4T), and 1-port et
Also Virtual-Template?
Is there a good explanation of their different applications? Does the
Group-Async alow you to defing a template for analog calls landing on a PRI?
Anthony Pace
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42584&t=42584
--
Every workstation is forced at 10/100/half, depending on the physical lines.
we have to force half duplex at the workstation and server because our
datacenter hosts our oracle DB for the teller and customer accounts, so we
need the error correction/detection with full duplex. our server is a compa
I would have to say you're ok. If you queueing is setup to give strict
priority to the voice packets, and the serialization is less than your codec
interval, I can' see why you wouldn't be alright without LFI.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42582&t=425
My experience is limited to ADSL. Does Cisco make a card like the
WIC-1ADSL that supports SDSL? Suggestions for how I can attach a 1700/2600
router to a SDSL connection?
I've looked through CCO and haven't found anything useful. Because I need
the SDSL router to run DES, the Cisco 673 doesn'
Is there a way to change the default MAC address of the Ethernet Out of Band
Controller on a router? We did a network discovery of all the routers (6500
MSFC) and the MAC is the same for all the EOBCs. The software we are using
flagged the duplicate MACs throughout the network as it discovered a
> Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the
> BGP neigh stats
> do you want to see?
I'm referring to simply 'sh ip bgp sum', as this will show the amount of
prefixes that you receive on each connection. So if I've read all of the
threads correctly, you have 2 T1's at 2 physica
084C2A6E195D3B7F can be written and another row above it with the HEX
numbers in order 0-F.
Anthony Pace
""Persio Pucci"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is there any formula to transform a hexadec pair of number from canonical
to
> non-canonical format beides th
All,
I have an oldish CiscoPro 2200 (clone Catalyst 2901)
running IOS version 2.1(4). I want to upgrade this to
a recent IOS, and have a 4.5 version to put on it. I was
told that I'll need to do this upgrade in steps and I see
on the Cisco site that I must first upgrade to 2.4(5) and
then ugrad
Is there any formula to transform a hexadec pair of number from canonical to
non-canonical format beides the chart presented on Caslow's book? (SR/TLB)
Persio
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42576&t=42576
--
FAQ,
>"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>
>> >I'm serious. Is there any reason why MPLS cannot be transported directly
>on
>> >fiber,
>> >perhaps even in time slots? Have the GMPLS and IPO WGs addressed this
>issue?
>> >
>> >-- TT
>>
>> That's exactly what those two working groups are doing, and other
Hi all,
I was wondering what you guys think about CCNP boot camps? Are they worth the
money? Any experience with them?
Thank you,
Dejan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42512&t=42512
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Are they worth the money? Can't say, never used one.
Is it possible to get CCNP certified in 2 weeks? Probably.
Would I trust a 2 week CCNP to touch any of my production switches/routers?
Not on your life.
I often get into the "experience -vs- certifications" debate with people,
and I am one
NO. Never go to a boot camp.
Take the normal 1 week courses for each - which is still better than
bootcamps.
Learning is so much better that way.
""Dejan Ristovski"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what you falks think about CCNP boot camps
Hi all,
I was wondering what you guys think about CCNP boot camps? Are they worth the
money? Any experience with them?
Thank you,
Dejan Ristovski
Cisco Technical Support, CCNA
EKONET
Authorized Cisco Distributor
Address:
Partizanski odredi 101, 1000 Skopje
Macedonia
Tel./Fax: ++389 2 361284
E-
Another option is a CS-508. It is an old model Cisco terminal server with 8
lines. I have a CS-516 and it works fine as a terminal server. You can find
them on ebay in the $200 range for the 8 port.
>From: "Patrick Ramsey"
>Reply-To: "Patrick Ramsey"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Chea
Craig,
I use the STS10 at home and it works great. I got it off ebay for $70 about
2 years ago and the only problem I had was getting the pinouts right. (it's
not the traditional rollover) Unfortunately, those boxes are EOL and seem
hard to come by. You might want to look at xyplex, they have
Check out http://www.provantage.com. Our experience with them has been
great, and their prices are fairly competitive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
sam sneed
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best s
Sam,
I always go to CNET first and search for the Cisco device. It then gives me
a list of prices and how many stars they have received. Most of the times,
lanblvd.com has turned out to be a good place, and I have not had any
problems with the service or products from them.
Hth,
Ole
~~
Ive come to figure that out but we had no auto-summ in the eigrp network
config so dont know what happens there.
I'm going to work on the lab tonite and see if I can replicate it or see
what other things come up with auto summary.
Thanks,
Keith
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, MADMAN wrote:
|->auto summary
on "slower speed" WAN links, does one have to fragment all large data
packets if the serialization delay introduced by the WAN link exceeds
the VoIP codec packet update interval?
As an example, a 1500 byte data packet has roughly about a 23 msec
serialization delay thru a 512 kbits/sec WAN link.
I think the VL must be defined on both routers using each others RID not
just any arbitraray interface) In your case maybe the time it worked just
happened to be when you defined the link with the RID.
Anthony Pace
""Jeremy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My qu
I have exact same setup at home (Comast to PIX 501) and I haven't had any
problems. I have a plain vanilla residential cable modem connection,
nothing special, and my PIX picks up the IP through DHCP with no problems at
all, and I get pretty good performance out of this connection. I have
severa
Dude, what the hell are you doing???
JR
--
Johnny Routin
The "Routin" One
""Lv Brahmam"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >MHotMailBE91562C007B4136E8213F68324B10EA0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002
06:57:00 -0700
> >Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3
Is it possible to create a secondary IP address for the inside interface on
a PIX?
Audy Bautista
Network Engineer, IT Services
Hold Brothers On-Line Investment Services, Inc.
(201) 499-8764
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A job worth doing is a job worth doing well"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Kage Roc wrote:
|->Im am not sure why this is happening but I'ill take a stab at it.
|->
|->If a router that is running EIGRP borders 2 major network (i.e.
209.53.131.0
|->Router-208.181.160.0) and auto-summary is turned on within the
EIGRP
|->config, it will advertis
I used the Cisco Certification Library, that comes with the Test Exams CDs.
That by itself was enough :)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Williams"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: books for CCNP [7:42513]
> I also used the Cisco Press books along with Boson
Does anyone know any good reliable websites where I can buy new Cisco
equipment? All I know of is CDW and a search on google doesn't return
anything useful. I am looking for a good price on a Cisco 2621. Thanks.
sam sneed
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42564&
My question is regarding OSPF and virtual links. As you can see, I have
created an area 23 between R2 and R3 such that R3 will need a virtual link
defined in order to have a connection to Area 0. My question is, does R3
have to peer with an interface in R2 that is a member of area 0? I have
not
Do the addresses come from one of the providers and if so is the other
provider annoucing this network? If so is this other provider
announcing a longer match thereby being prefered?
I'm guessing your not getting full routes, partial routes are a
providers own networks and those of it's custom
the config was compiled based on a DISCUSSION & a pdf, no testing 'cause i'm
looking for a cheap simulator!
-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:26 PM
To: Mirza, Timur; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is the following pap callin cfg
I have DSL site to site links, and qcheck works well.
http://www.netiq.com/qcheck/complementarytools.asp
-Original Message-
From: Larry Ogunbanjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DSL traffic monitoring [7:42551]
Group
I was doing some more indepth reading in EIGRP and thats what I had come
to as well, but we had no auto-summary in the eigrp config.
I ended solving it by putting in a static route. Packets were getting in
but not getting out.
Keith
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, MADMAN wrote:
|->
|-> auto summary, whi
www.dslreports.com
or more precisely here http://www.dslreports.com/tools
Nilesh
""Larry Ogunbanjo"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Group
>
> Does anyone know of any software that can confirm the
> speed at which my DSL connection is set to.
>
> Thanks
>
> =
I also used the Cisco Press books along with Boson exams. Worked for me
=)
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42556&t=42513
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cis
I'm wanting to use the IP RTP Priority command but I'm running into a couple
of situations that aren't covered by any documentation I can find and wanted
to see if anyone else knew or had used this and could offer some suggestions:
BTW, I'm doing this on a 4700M+ with IOS 12.1(9) with a OC-3 ATM
Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the BGP neigh stats
do you want to see?
Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
Description: To provider1
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 5/255
Encapsulation
Where did you find an STS10!?!?!? I would like on for my little
museum, I have a couple AGS's, CGS's and MGS's, haven't seen an STS in
10 years!!
Dave
Craig Columbus wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet
> remote management? I only need three
Yes! that's exactly my case! Connect to the ISP via DHCP-assigned IP
address, and needs another IP for the Internet interface - both occur on the
same interface! However, my case differ from the example in which I can only
assign the Ethernet interface a real IP using DHCP, and My 2610 won't allo
Group
Does anyone know of any software that can confirm the
speed at which my DSL connection is set to.
Thanks
=
Please confirm receipt of message by
phone/fax ++44 (0)7092152779 or
email or Yahoo! messenger: ogunbanjol
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Type "rossi pdf token ring" in google and select one of the options
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Oxman, Steve wrote:
| Koen
| You refer to the Rossi paper for token ring, do you know where I can get
| a copy of this?
| Regards
| Steve
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Koen Zeilstra [mailto:[EM
>MHotMailBE91562C007B4136E8213F68324B10EA0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:00 -0700
>Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>JAA09299;Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:54:21 -0400
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:57:49 -0700
>Message-Id:
>X-AskVersion: 1.2a (http://www.paganini.n
>MHotMailBE915786004D400432563F68324B12AE0; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:02:46 -0700
>Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
>JAA07292;Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:48:02 -0400
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:03:30 -0700
>Message-Id:
>X-AskVersion: 1.2a (http://www.paganini.n
- Original Message -
From: "Brahmam"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0)
> cofirmed
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM
> Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b
- Original Message -
From: "Brahmam"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0)
> cofirmed
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM
> Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b
cofirmed
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 7:24 PM
Subject: Please confirm (conf#fa1265b7ef286b596b026270a5ea7bb0)
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
> the server does not recognize you as a confirmed post
An old 486, a handful of serial cards and linux
"Craig Columbus"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/04/2002 14:37
Please respond to "Craig Columbus"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Cheap terminal server? [7:42536]
Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal se
here comes the link
http://www.lantronix.com/
there goes the link
-Patrick
>>> "Craig Columbus" 04/25/02 09:37AM >>>
Can anyone recommend a cheap terminal server, used only for reverse telnet
remote management? I only need three lines and I don't want to spend the
cash on a 2509. Any
The Ts are connected to two different routers at different locations
The IP space is the providers What do you mean full vs. default/partial
routes (Pardon my ignorance; I wish LAN/WAN communications was the only
thing to work on)?
Thanks for the quick response!
-Original Message---
there is no shortcut or cramming!,
it is a time compression!
--- Shahid Muhammad Shafi wrote:
> one line for u Khalid
>
> "There is no shortcut to success"
>
> Objectives are 90 percent same for both tests then
> why
> worry. I think u r worried all those "shortcuts" or
> "Cramming" wont work
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
