RE: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread Arni V. Skarphedinsson
I have sees this exact problem with a lot of the pix 501 boxes, and would be intrested to know if cisco is going to do anything about it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58975t=58946 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: Hello (long response) [7:58824]

2002-12-11 Thread William Gragido
LMAO. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter van Oene Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hello (long response) [7:58824] I brought these issues to my boss attention last wednesday and on thursay he

RE: Please help: 2600 console lost [7:58889]

2002-12-11 Thread R M
good question ;-)... 'cause at that point I was testing my box as a pure bridge (without IRB or CRB)... I guess I'll have to replace the box. Thanks for your answers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58978t=58889 --

Re: bandwidth [7:58788]

2002-12-11 Thread Selcuk Kardes
Hi, i am looking for a switch which have to be set the port bandwidth (rate limit) in kilobit order (for example 256K) then i found a cisco 3550 catalyst series (you can set the port bandwidth in 8K order) now i am searching another reseller maybe hp,3com,huwaei etc..(our boss want to compare

RE: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58957]

2002-12-11 Thread Ozan Akdemir
PIX doesn't support these 2 features. Actually I believe that altough Cisco PIX firewalls' performance's are better than checkpoint, they have some disadvantages. Besides the features you have mentioned also Pix lacks some NAT properties, logging performance etc. -Original Message- From:

Re: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread MADMAN
I'm guessing that the power is being lost for a split second causing the reload but the power connecter always looks secure. The early 1600's had similiar problems but they changed the connector and they seem much better now. Maybe I'm just lucky or more abusive. If you set it up and never

RE: Resricicting Certain Users -Pix 515 UR [7:58861]

2002-12-11 Thread Andrew Larkins
Maybe a dumb question - but is there a certain software version for that command (object group) - haven't seen it before -Original Message- From: Kevin O'Gilvie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2002 22:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Resricicting Certain Users -Pix 515

Mac network [7:58945]

2002-12-11 Thread Dwayne Saunders
Hi all Mac users I have a small problem with a network that I was asked to look at there is 6 end user machines and 1 server all connected via a switch the problem is that when connected to the switch network transfers to and from the server are very slow i.e. 100meg file take approx 18

RE: BCRAN or BSCI or both? [7:58942]

2002-12-11 Thread Kenan Ahmed Siddiqi
Hi there, Yes I have cleared BCMSN and CIT. I do have a solid grounding in both but I myself don't feel too good about BSCI (especially after IS-IS) so I think I will try my luck with BCRAN. I have hands-on experience so I don't think there should be much of a problem. Besides, I will study before

VPN Concetrator #3030 [7:58982]

2002-12-11 Thread neil K.
Hi All, Few questions regarding the VPN Concentrator 1. what do I do for Redundancy, ( VPN Redundant Bundle) 2. Load balancing 3. Where to put the Concentrator ( prefer putting the VPN Concetrator behind Firewall).What are issues I will have to consider if I put the concentrator behind Firewall.

RE: Cisco exam Centers (Spain, Madrid) [7:58898]

2002-12-11 Thread richard dumoulin
Hi, I found that Microforum is the cheapest of all, and you can choose any working day of the week to do the test !!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58983t=58898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread MikeS
Mine are fine.. running the newest IOS without any kind of *reload* issue. Perhaps I'm just one of the lucky few ;) MikeS -- Tutorials - Whitepapers - Security - Wireless- News Find me at www-dot-packetattack-dot-com MADMAN wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi,

Re: Hello (long response) [7:5788]

2002-12-11 Thread MikeS
Amen to this statement.. as an *ex* boss of mine found out a few years ago when I was the one interviewing him. I did give it an honest try and was happy to find out that he did not have the skills we needed. I had actually tried to get out of doing the interview due to intense personal disklike

Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl backup [7:58987]

2002-12-11 Thread MikeS
I did this for a client against my better judgement and wrote it up as such. DSL around here has not been stable enough and I've had a few cases where the telco disconnected the DSL line without saying anything. When asked about it, they replied they had not seen any traffic and *assumed* it was a

TACACS+ AS5300 [7:58977]

2002-12-11 Thread Mamoon Dawood
Dear All, =20 I'm configuring TACACS+ with AS5300, but I can not understand the meaning of TACACS+ or RADIUS Key, is it the enable secret password on the AS5300? =20 Regards, Mamoon [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Blank Bkgrd.gif] Message

Re: Reduce the noise from router fans for home lab [7:58648]

2002-12-11 Thread MikeS
A couple of things I've done.. 1: enclosed rack.. 2: Bose headset from ebay.. worth very penny and if you fly much, you will wonder how you made it without them. I had a cheaper set but after 2 hours my ears were sore from being squashed. I wore the Bose for a 14 hour flight to/from France last

Re: PIX 501 and MSN Messanger Voice / Video Chat [7:58809]

2002-12-11 Thread Aaron J. Pilcher
These are the MSN messanger voice, video, chat, and file transfer configs I have on my pix. It works fine for me, I am doing NO NAT Though. access-list 100 permit tcp any 255.255.255.192 1503 access-list 100 permit tcp any 255.255.255.192 h323 access-list 100 permit tcp any

Question about show ip bgp regexp output [7:58972]

2002-12-11 Thread TMS
Hello When I run command sh ip bgp regexp _100$ on my bgp router I have output which looks like this: * 192.168.192.0/19 10.1.212.15 0200 0 100 i * i 10.1.212.20 0200 0 100 i * 192.168.198.16/30 10.1.212.15

RE: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58989]

2002-12-11 Thread eric nguyen
Thanks everyone for your advices and input. Checkpoint license, maintenance and support are very expensive. We also host web services in-house and based on my research and if I understand it correctly, Pix performance is excellent. On a similarly related topic, I am studying for my Cisco CSS-1

Re: PIX 501 and MSN Messanger Voice / Video Chat [7:58809]

2002-12-11 Thread Brian
my experience is that at least one end needs to be non natted for this to work, and if one end is natted it should of course it should be the natted end that originates the connection, specifying a public ip as the destination. Bri On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Aaron J. Pilcher wrote: These

RE: Please help: 2600 console lost [7:58889]

2002-12-11 Thread Daniel Cotts
We're assuming that the console port is toast. Just in case there is some life in it try the speed jumper on the motherboard. Watch the wrap: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_tech_note09186 a008009433b.shtml#band_reset -Original Message- From: R M

Re: PIX 501 PPOE Verizon [7:58796]

2002-12-11 Thread Fred Wittenberg
The below example would be for a group named 'colonial: vpdn group colonial request dialout pppoe vpdn group colonial localname USER_NAME vpdn group colonial ppp authentication pap vpdn username USER_NAME password * HTH, FW - Original Message - From: Mark W. Odette II To:

RE: Resricicting Certain Users -Pix 515 UR [7:58861]

2002-12-11 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
Yeah, Its starts at version 6.2. Its great, drastically reduces your config lines.. From: Andrew Larkins Reply-To: Andrew Larkins To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Resricicting Certain Users -Pix 515 UR [7:58861] Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:32:13 GMT Maybe a dumb question - but is there a

RE: BCRAN 640-505 [7:58871]

2002-12-11 Thread Maccubbin, Duncan
Having taken the original Remote Access exam and 640-605 with both books, there is a difference. Since I passed the 605 exam with the certification guide it can be done. It seemed to me the certification guide assumes you know remote access and you just want to brush up. It didn't really put a lot

Re: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread MADMAN
I just got a reply back from the engineer at Cisco that RMAed the PIX. Yesterday he didn't know of any issues but he must have asked some peers as I got a email today verifying that I'm not yet totally off me rocker. Here is what info I received: It is a known issue. I will issue another RMA

Re: why lose connection after apply IDS on PIX [7:58960]

2002-12-11 Thread Greg Owens
I have implemented the same IDS on the PIX, however, I did not and would not drop informational alarms. That why you are lose connectivity. Just use the alarm option. From: Kenny Smith Date: 2002/12/10 Tue PM 10:18:16 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: why lose connection after apply IDS

RE: VPN Concetrator #3030 [7:58982]

2002-12-11 Thread Elijah Savage III
I have just finished a project like this. You can only do one or the other you can't do redundant and load balancing all at once on the 3030. If you want to be redundant where if one concentrator fails secondary comes online and accepts request for it then you need to look into VRRP so easy to do

Re: TACACS+ AS5300 [7:58977]

2002-12-11 Thread Andrew Dorsett
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mamoon Dawood wrote: I'm configuring TACACS+ with AS5300, but I can not understand the meaning of TACACS+ or RADIUS Key, is it the enable secret password on the AS5300? No, radius uses a key that you enter to provide for the encrypt/decrpt of the auth/acct packets. You

RE: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:59004]

2002-12-11 Thread Justin Menga
Hi, A) No B) No Work arounds are to do this on a separate Cisco router - e.g. Border router perhaps. Cisco routers have good QoS, and also have a rotary NAT feature that load balances incoming packets sent to a global IP to multiple private Ips. This feature however is very simple and is

RE: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread Elijah Savage III
Thank you Dave for the info I am not doing something wrong then. I am going to see what they can do for me. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 4:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 501 reloading [7:58946] I just got a

Re: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58968]

2002-12-11 Thread Larry Roberts
Eric, The PIX by itself cannot do any of the features you are asking about below. You can throw in a Cisco router though to get those features. For the load balancing, you will need Server Load Balancing (SLB), which is supported on the 3631, 3725, 7100 and 7200 series routers. HTH, Larry

RE: VPN Concetrator #3030 [7:58982]

2002-12-11 Thread Joseph Brunner
Responses in line 1. what do I do for Redundancy, ( VPN Redundant Bundle) It runs VRRP for concentrator redundancy. For user sessions you make a cluster using VCA under Configuration | System | Load Balancing. For redundancy on LAN to LAN tunnels its much harder.. They way the concentrator

RE: Auto-Negotiation or Manual Configuration [7:58904]

2002-12-11 Thread Kevin Stone
Just read this article that outlines some of the issues with auto-negotiation - http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/1209tolly.html We always use manual configuration on network devices, and typically on computers. There are always exceptions but they are pretty rare. -Kevin

Re: Mac network [7:58945]

2002-12-11 Thread MADMAN
autonegotiate on the switch. Dave Dwayne Saunders wrote: Hi all Mac users I have a small problem with a network that I was asked to look at there is 6 end user machines and 1 server all connected via a switch the problem is that when connected to the switch network transfers to

Re: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread Brad Ellis
Dave, That's really strange. Ive seen quite a few Pix 501s, and havent seen that problem. Although a customer of ours was mentioning something to that effect, and I really didnt put much thought into it. I'll have to keep my eye out for that one. Thanks for the info Dave. -Brad Ellis

RE: Mac network [7:58945]

2002-12-11 Thread Mark Smith
If I recall correctly, G3 beige mini-towers and older hardware all came with 10MB NICs. Without checking Apple's online specs site, I don't know what generation laptops started using 10/100 cards - somewhere in the G3 generation I'd guess. What PC hardware is running on this network?

Router setup [7:59009]

2002-12-11 Thread Brian Zeitz
I was setting up a few 3640 routers with build in CSU/DSU, instead of doing the usual on the serial interface. ( I felt like playing around) Config t Int S2/0 Autodetect PPP Bandwidth 154000 Then I got nothing on my Line Protocol. Then I did an Encapsulation PPP (on the S2/0

640-901 Passed !!!!!!!!!! [7:59012]

2002-12-11 Thread Btma1
Well, I just passed it today with a score of 813.YEAH !!. My first towards CCNP status. The exam was straight forward, but some question are tricky and wordy. The simulation is based, (for my exam) on what you are good at configuring. I realized this after the exam. Before

RE: MTU problem handling [7:58894]

2002-12-11 Thread Haynes, Mark
Thanks Priscilla, Just theory for now. A colleague of mine is planning to use Jumbo packets on Gigabit links through the switches and was considering using a Fast Ethernet link as a backup. From your comments this is not going to work, so we'll have to think of something else. I'll, also,

Re: 640-901 Passed !!!!!!!!!! [7:59012]

2002-12-11 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Btma1 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, I just passed it today with a score of 813.YEAH !!. My first towards CCNP status. The exam was straight forward, but some question are tricky and wordy. The simulation is based, (for my exam) on

Re: 640-901 Passed !!!!!!!!!! [7:59012]

2002-12-11 Thread Mark Smith
Quoting The Long and Winding Road : Btma1 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, I just passed it today with a score of 813.YEAH !!. My first towards CCNP status. The exam was straight forward, but some question are tricky and wordy.

RE: extended access-list in/ out [7:58750]

2002-12-11 Thread Aaron Laws
Do you even need to specify the source port? Why wouldn't you just do: access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq telnet? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59015t=58750 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duct Tape solved this problem for me Lots of it. Or immobilize the pix and the power cord. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 5:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 501 reloading [7:58946] I'm guessing that the power

3550 study strategy - ANY ?? [7:59000]

2002-12-11 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, Does anyone have a study strategy for the 3550 - in terms of preparing for the CCIE Lab??I see lots of topics under: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12111ea1/3550scg/index.htm Is there any that one should focus on or is one required to read and master each and

RE: Mac network [7:58945]

2002-12-11 Thread Ted Marinich
Dwayne, If you can check the network couters on your MAC - look for FCS error. If you have any, then this is a classic duplex mismatch. Second thing you can do is transfer a file to and from the workstation. I use FTP and issue a get and then a put. Comparing the results will reveal a mismatch

Re: is there anyone migrating isdn backup to dsl b [7:58994]

2002-12-11 Thread Brad Ellis
Use something like whatsup gold to monitor the DSL line. Have it send traffic across the line every 60 seconds or so. We're doing like that with our cable-modem backup connection and it's great! It does two things: 1) puts occasional traffic across the line so the ISP doesnt think the line is

RE: PIX 501 PPOE Verizon [7:58796]

2002-12-11 Thread Brian Zeitz
I know there is a document called PPPOE on 501 or 506 on Cisco site. According to Cisco 515 doesn't support it, but others say they have it working. The document said SOHO on it. Keep in mind it might help to have the latest PIX image to support this. That can be downloaded with a CCO account.

RE: 3550 study strategy - ANY ?? [7:59000]

2002-12-11 Thread J M
I am also preparing for the lab and it is my goal to get as much configuration experience with the 3550 as possible. I know you said dont say everything but the more prepared you are the better. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59019t=59000

RE: OT low cost DS3 router [7:58916]

2002-12-11 Thread Ted Marinich
JS, Without knowing your available hardware, its hard to say what your best cost options are. But, if you have a modular router like Cisco 3640, you can buy a HSSI interface and plug your DS3 right into the router from your carrier. Your ISP will provide the IP addressing and your local

RE: extended access-list in/ out [7:58750]

2002-12-11 Thread Dwayne Saunders
I have just found that it is good practice to not allow the source port if below 1024 Regards D'Wayne Saunders Data Network Administrator -Original Message- From: Aaron Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 12 December 2002 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: extended

RE: VPN Concentrator #3030 [7:58982]

2002-12-11 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
Minor comment - protocol 50 and 51, not port ... Also - worth noting, using TCP for remote client VPN's is useful as well ... like 443 since it will be permitted out from just about everywhere! Thanks! TJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58968]

2002-12-11 Thread Brian
important to keep in mind here, pix is a firewall, not a router. You want a router, that'll be a separate thing. Bri On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Larry Roberts wrote: Eric, The PIX by itself cannot do any of the features you are asking about below. You can throw in a Cisco router though

FDDI concentrator ? [7:59023]

2002-12-11 Thread nettable_walker
12/11/20026:42pm Wednesday Professionals, I never (thankfully) had to work with FDDI --- however --- I was able to land two 4500's two Nortel ASN's real cheap for my home lab. All 4 routers have dual ethernet, quad serial, MMF FDDI modules. I also have a MMF FDDI NIC card for my NT

Re: OT: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58957]

2002-12-11 Thread Kent Hundley
A) No B) No It appears that someone in mgmt. has made a layer 8 (political) decision to migrate your firewall since the PIX does not support features you are currently using and yet the decision has already been made. At this point, I would recommend that you put together a brief presentation

RE: VPN Concentrator #3030 [7:58982]

2002-12-11 Thread Elijah Savage III
Thank you Tj for the correction my brain was wondering when trying to type this quickie up notice the reference to CCO LOL. I also found in our deployment using tcp connection on the client version 3.6 was a lot more reliable with cable modem providers for some reason I could not nail it down why,

RE: Mac network [7:58945]

2002-12-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Dwayne Saunders wrote: Hi all Mac users I have a small problem with a network that I was asked to look at there is 6 end user machines and 1 server What kind of server? If it's a Windows server, check out this terrific site for cross-platform networks. http://www.macwindows.com/

Re: Visio Stencil for Cisco [7:58509]

2002-12-11 Thread not enough time to study
Wow--great link. i had only known of netformx until now. thanks. Patrick Matthews wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Try www.altimatech.com. they have everything and will do custom stencils for you. I downloaded thier standard package and it has over 300 Cisco

Re: 3550 study strategy - ANY ?? [7:59000]

2002-12-11 Thread Jason Viera
Well just print out another few hundred pages and you'll be there. The Configuration guide is pretty good. I haven't attempted the lab yet but would assume the following items are likely to be seen: trunking, etherchannel, unicast routing, multicast routing, VTP, Vlan-maps, fallback-bridging,

RE: FDDI concentrator ? [7:59023]

2002-12-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
nettable_walker wrote: 12/11/20026:42pm Wednesday Professionals, I never (thankfully) had to work with FDDI --- however --- I was able to land two 4500's two Nortel ASN's real cheap for my home lab. All 4 routers have dual ethernet, quad serial, MMF FDDI modules. I also have

Re: why lose connection after apply IDS on PIX [7:58960]

2002-12-11 Thread Kenny Smith
Hi.. Greg. Thanks 4 your guide. By the way, Are you saying that we can drop the attack alarm not the informational alarm? From: Greg Owens Reply-To: Greg Owens To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: why lose connection after apply IDS on PIX [7:58960] Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:56:41 GMT I have

RE: 501 reloading [7:58946]

2002-12-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Duct Tape solved this problem for me Lots of it. Hee hee. I bet this is more common than anyone would want to admit. :-) I saw duct tape in a working (not lab) network room just recently. I couldn't decide if I should be disgusted or impressed by the ingenuity. In

Re: FDDI concentrator ? [7:59023]

2002-12-11 Thread nettable_walker
Thank you. What I really need is a recomendation for hardware. A linkbuilder ? or something else ? I am guessing that is the only piece of euipment I still need (other than MMF cable) Thanks again, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

RE: why lose connection after apply IDS on PIX [7:58960]

2002-12-11 Thread Greg Owens Jr
The Information in just for your information because those signature contain some normal data traffic, so you want to configure the information alarm as follow ip audit name outside-info info action alarm Greg Owens Jr -Original Message- From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: 640-901 Passed !!!!!!!!!! [7:59012]

2002-12-11 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
Binh, Congrats. How did you fare on the IS-IS portion of the test? I am assuming that Cisco is taking it easy on people with this protocol as of now. thanks - jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59032t=59012 --

RE: Auto-Negotiation or Manual Configuration [7:58904]

2002-12-11 Thread Frank Jimenez
The trick here is that you have to manually set both sides. You would not believe the number of times that I've seen production networks with auto-negotiation set on the PC and full duplex/speed 100 manually set on the switch. That doesn't work one bit. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL

Wireless Exam [7:59035]

2002-12-11 Thread Anil Kumar
Hi, I am planning to take the Wireless LAN exam for field engineers next week. Anyone who has taken the test recently could please provide the last min tips about no of questions/ passing score/ areas to be concentrate. Thanks in Advance, Regards..Anil

RE: MTU problem handling [7:58894]

2002-12-11 Thread Silju Pillai
I agree with Priscilla, the switch will drop the packets if it receives a packet greater than the default mtu size (1500). I faced an issue with MTU size when I configured MPLS. Although I was able to ping the other end, I was not able run any application over the backbone. The problem was with

Will port span slow down the port.. [7:59037]

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Campbell
Hi.. Dear all, When I use a port (connected to PC A) to monitor another port (connected to PC B). When I ran netmon software on PC A to capture the traffic between PC B with other PC. I found my PC B is extremely slow after being monitored. Why? Will port span slow it down

RE: CCIE LAB Study Partner in Houston [7:56636]

2002-12-11 Thread YAO NING
Hi,Joseph, My name's Yao Ning. I live in Houston now. I'm preparing CCIE Lab for routingswitching. My scheduled date is Apr,26. I'm looking for someone studying together. So I'm glad to see this message you posted. If you're interested in passing the Lab with me, please touch me. Best regards

2514 Console ports not working [7:59039]

2002-12-11 Thread Keyur Lavingia
Hi, I have two 2514s that are giving problems with the console ports. One of them does not give any output at all when you power it on and the other one does not take any input at all. It starts fine, and then halts at the initial config dialog. I am not able to give it a break either. I have

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

2002-12-11 Thread wanabe ccie
Ivan why not make the min threshold and max threshold gap bigger? in your design, ip precedence 5 only have a gap of 300 (700 1000). my opinion is wred reacts fast whenever you reach and exceeds the maximum threshold. it clips all of your packets whenever it reach that state. wred starts to clip

2514 Console ports not working [7:59040]

2002-12-11 Thread Keyur Lavingia
Hi, I have two 2514s that are giving problems with the console ports. One of them does not give any output at all when you power it on and the other one does not take any input at all. It starts fine, and then halts at the initial config dialog. I am not able to give it a break either. I have

CCIE question... [7:59042]

2002-12-11 Thread ragavendran k rao
I am taking up my CCIE drake shortly. A couple of questions: 1) Is IGRP included for theory exam ? 2) Is IPX, Apple included for theory exam ? 3) How sufficient is the Cisco Press prep guide for CCIE ? Appreciate your time. _

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

2002-12-11 Thread wanabe ccie
you said you classified your voice traffic as prec 5. how about the other packets? particularly for tcp? you said they put the other packets into the default prec. it might have been the tcp packets where put into the default. wred clips packets by weight, it means lower precedence packets will be

VPN Question? [7:59043]

2002-12-11 Thread ramesh c
Hi folks, My set up as follows Host A-(in)PixA(out)Internet---(out)PixB(in)HostB I have a VPN using Ipsec between Pix A and Pix B.Do I need to have a Static (inside,outside)to hostB for hostA to connect or Pix B would default route the packet to hostb. nat 0 access-list 80

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

2002-12-11 Thread wanabe ccie
and one more thing, you should not do wred whenever you do VoIP. it might not do you good because it will clipped VoIP packets and introduce delay. what i think is best is you do low latency queing at you routers(make your VoIP packets as priority packets and assign bandwidth to them, while

Re: CCIE question... [7:59042]

2002-12-11 Thread Brian
any whats on there questions are best answered by looking at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html Bri - Original Message - From: ragavendran k rao To: Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:46 PM Subject: CCIE question... [7:59042] I am taking

Re: CCIE question... [7:59042]

2002-12-11 Thread ragavendran k rao
what about my third question ? Original Message Follows From: Brian To: ragavendran k rao , Subject: Re: CCIE question... [7:59042] Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:03:40 -0800 any whats on there questions are best answered by looking at

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

2002-12-11 Thread Ivan Yip
Hi, Thanks your advice again. I am just trying the method to provide Per-VC QoS based on IP header information (in our case is IP precedence). From cisco documentation, I found WRED, Set-CLP, WFQ/CBWFQ/LLQ will proivde IP-to-ATM CoS. From your comment, you recommend use queueing method to do

high CRC and runts error [7:59049]

2002-12-11 Thread Richard Campbell
Hi.. I have a switch port with high CRC and runts errors with no collision. The duplex and speed are match for PC and port. Anything can do with that? switch5sh int fas0/15 FastEthernet0/15 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 00d0.790c.cccf (bia 00d0.790c.cccf)