Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

Hi Group, This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment whether the bandwidth is healthy? Thanks FastEthernet0/48 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 000a.f477.662c (bia 000a.f477.662c) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,

Any help appreciated - Router will not route.... [7:62568]

I have a 3640 router (Pri rate Interface / backup ISDN interfaces) that is not performing as I thought it would...One of the channelised interfaces went down yesterday and the backup ISDN for that line kicked in, however I could no longer ping into the remote site once the backup came up - The

RE: SAFE exam (9e0-131) [7:62494]

Thanks Dwayne. When you say they are based on the safe whitepapers - do you mean more than just the 'Small, Medium Remote user' one? Keith -Original Message- From: Dwayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2003 00:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SAFE exam

ASBR ROUTER [7:62570]

HELLO Could you please help me? I want to configure Cisco router series 2600 to enable OSPF and configure it as autonomous system border routers (ASBR) in one single area; the router has 2 interfaces one connected to ISP and the second one to my internal network that use OSPF protocol Can you

RE: ATM explanation [7:62502]

Hi Guys, We found an odd thing. The connetion between the ATM switch and the cisco router were not talking the same link protocol. We changed the conf. and now we can ping the interface even if one su-interface is down. Thanks to all. Silvia Message Posted at:

RE: ASBR ROUTER [7:62570]

You can either use default-information originate, or put a default static route and redistribute that into OSPF. This will cause all traffic that is not part of your internal network to be routed out via the ASBR, hence all Internet traffic will route out through the ASBR. Hope that helps,

RE: Modem Config [7:62479]

What terminal program are you using? I use just plain Hyperterminal. = Make sure you have it set to VT100. Here is a screen shot. =20 =20 =20 Good Luck, =20 =20 Scott Terminiello President Scott Enterprises 5 Whitney Drive Marlboro, NJ 07746-1241 Office: (732)972-2698 Email: [EMAIL

RE: Content Switch Module and Server Load Balancing [7:62443]

It is concerning if SLB can do the job, and when it is necessary the CSM module. Andrew Larkins em 05/02/2003 11:12:58 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:RE: Content Switch Module and Server Load Balancing [7:62443] yes -we have done it on the 6509 and all is

PIX firewall simultaneous connections [7:62575]

Hello groupies, I was reading the PIX book and it apparently said that the no. of connection supported by a PIX firewall (higher order) is 500,000. Does this mean that upto 500,000 sessions can be established or something else? If so, what do I do if I have a thoroughput of say 2 million users?

NETWORK MANAGEMENT EXAM 9E0-300 [7:62576]

Hi, I am taking the Network Management Exam 9E0-300 by March. Anyone here who take this exam? How's the exam? What's the passing percentage? What topics are recommended for reading? Any available tutorials in the Net that I can go?? Please HELP.. Lew Message Posted at:

Re: Any help appreciated - Router will not route.... [7:62568]

What does your route table show on both routers? Mark I have a 3640 router (Pri rate Interface / backup ISDN interfaces) that is not performing as I thought it would...One of the channelised interfaces went down yesterday and the backup ISDN for that line kicked in, however I could no longer

Re: PIX firewall simultaneous connections [7:62575]

I believe that if you check the Cisco website or documentation, you will see that it defines a session as a single TCP or UDP connection. If somehow you had 2M users, yet their total number of sessions never exceeded 500K, then your firewall could handle 2M users. I am not addressing performance

Question about CEF [7:62579]

Hello friends, I'm working with CEF and I would appreciate your help in this easy (I hope) question: I would like to know the meaning of attached and receive fields that I can see when I execute show ip cef. Thanks!!! ___ Yahoo! Msviles

Re: T1 Csu dsu issue(commands) [7:62445]

The version 2 WIC commands are all identical this WIC just has an upgraded framer and some other hardware. What exactly are you trying to do?? Dave Simmi Singh wrote: Hi Dave Thanx replying is this in version 2 of WIC-1DSU-T1 these commands work fine or what I could not get u. May

RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]

checked duplex/speed, they were 10 half, set to full, didn't help. I'll post my findings if I can find the problem. Xueyan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62581t=62461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Any help appreciated - Router will not route.... [7:62568]

When the primary is up the route table shows: 192.1.1.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks S 192.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0:1 C 192.1.1.25/32 is directly connected, Serial0/0:1 When the primary goes down it shows: 192.1.1.0/24 is variably subnetted,

Re: PIX firewall simultaneous connections [7:62575]

These are TCP and UDP connections. Keep in mind that PIX must keep a state table for these connections so thats probably where it gets the limit from. I really can't see how you could have 2 million users internally going through 1 firewall so I assume you mean 2 million people hitting a webserver

Re: Any help appreciated - Router will not route.... [7:62568]

I'd check the isdn stuf, deb dialer, deb isdn q931, etc... DW a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When the primary is up the route table shows: 192.1.1.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks S 192.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0:1 C

DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Hello, Is DVMRP covered at all in the new CCIE Lab? Any other new/odd topics? Ex. MRM or PGM?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Re: Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

No, too many errors. The are caused by the having the router set to half duplex. On 2600 routers you can set the interfaces to full duplex. You should do this on the router and on the switch for that port. Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

Re: PIX firewall simultaneous connections [7:62575]

I have approximately 2 million hits a day on web pages behind a pair of PIX 515's in failover and send out a little more than a million subscription (not spam) email's every night and the only issue I have is that the available 1550 (Ethernet) blocks drops to zero at times during the 3 or 4 hours

RE: Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

From the output interpreter on www.cisco.com (you may need a cco login for it) == SHOW INTERFACE FAST/GIGABIT/ETHERNET NOTIFICATIONS (if any) ==

RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]

finally found the problem. my end is configured for IKE replay protection but the far end isn't so it drops packets. The interesting thing is that I got some packes but not all, which made me think it's simply slow. found this out by debug vpn. Thanks all for your help. Cheers. Xueyan

RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Uh oh. Someone on this list probably pooped their pants after reading CN's message because of the NDA. :-) Probably the most you'll get out of anyone is that it is possible that DVMRP is covered in the new CCIE lab because anything is fair game. Since the Cisco IOS software supports PIM-to-DVMRP

creating seperate sessions on a 2611 [7:62591]

I am trying to create seperate login sessions on a 2611 in such a way that remote users connectiong to the 2611 can not tamper with each others devices. In other word our 2611 is connected to 15 devices, we have 3 admins responsible for these devices(each admin handales 3 to 6 devices..routers and

RE: Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\) wrote: Hi Group, This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment whether the bandwidth is healthy? Thanks Bandwidth just means capacity. It can't be healthy or not healthy, although the amount of bandwith could be inappropriate for the

RE: Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

Cool! Notice that they think it's a router, when it's really a switch. So a few things might not apply, thought they probably do. Also their runt verbiage is weak. :-) They say this: WARNING: More than 0.1% of input traffic are 'runts'. I guess 0.1% must be their threshold, which seems really

RE: creating seperate sessions on a 2611 [7:62591]

username johnboy password abcdefg username autocommand menu menu_jb username bettysue password hijklm username autocommand menu menu_bs ip host Port01 2001 192.168.1.1 ip host Port02 2002 192.168.1.1 etc ip host Port15 2015 192.168.1.1 ip host Port16 2016 192.168.1.1 int lo0 ip add 192.168.1.1

OT: WAM!NET jobs [7:62595]

Sorry for the OT (I also couldn't connect to the jobs newsfeed), but we are doing some serious hiring. If you, or anyone you need is looking for a job and has at least a Secret clearance, email me offline. Visit www.wamnet.com to view a list of the jobs. Any design positions DO NOT require a

fixup http [7:62596]

Folks Is there anyone out there tell me exactly what the http fixup functionality on a Pix (6.1) fixes up. I cant find anything on CCO that describes what exactly it is in http that the PIX believes needs to be fixed up. I am experiencing an issue where certain web sites (particularly certain

RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Ooops!! It should be my pant ;- I did not mean anyone to violate the dreaded NDA. My question should have read: is DVMRP a part of the CCIE topics for the Lab? The reason is that I see a lot of DVMRP material in the cmd. and config. guide but not on other topics MOSPF etc. I guess, then

RE: PIX logging [7:62467]

If you do find a workaround, please let us (me) know? Thanks Jmaie -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX logging [7:62467] Further to this, I searched Google (I do get it

GRRRRR v.90 and v.92 [7:62599]

What does it take to get a stable connection of v.90+ out of the Mica Modems? I have had to drop down the S29 registry to 5. because 6 and 12 were causing to many retrains. The provider claims the PRI is clean and I am on my 12th string. This has been going on for monthsanyone had any luck?

Re: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ooops!! It should be my pant ;- I did not mean anyone to violate the dreaded NDA. My question should have read: is DVMRP a part of the CCIE topics for the Lab? The reason is that I see a lot of DVMRP material in

Re: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Is DVMRP covered at all in the new CCIE Lab? Any other new/odd topics? Ex. MRM or PGM?? I'm just dying to talk about some things I did NOT see in the Lab my last trip through. I was quite surprised. Having said

Re: ASBR ROUTER [7:62570]

hanan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... HELLO Could you please help me? I want to configure Cisco router series 2600 to enable OSPF and configure it as autonomous system border routers (ASBR) in one single area; the router has 2 interfaces one connected to ISP

RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

I think I can answer this one without violating NDA. MOSPF is not covered in the lab because Cisco has chosen not to support MOSPF in IOS. Surely you would agree that it is not easy to test something in the lab that is not actually supported within Cisco gear.To digress, I am not aware

RE: PIX logging [7:62467]

I don't think that there is one. I think 5.2 will fix it, but you need a 16MB flash card, and I only have a 2MB card ;( Never mind, I am playing with Conduits for a while, good to learn too. Symon -Original Message- From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2003

More PIX fun and games :) [7:62605]

Hi all, Another thing I found that is disturbing about the PIX is that I can't seem to do Port redirection on it (5.1(5)). I found a document that says you can from 6.0 onwards, but what do the zillions of people who had/have PIX with less than 6.0 code do when they needed to do some port

Re: More PIX fun and games :) [7:62605]

Do you have the hardware to support an upgrade? Symon Thurlow wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, Another thing I found that is disturbing about the PIX is that I can't seem to do Port redirection on it (5.1(5)). I found a document that says you can from

Re: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

David C Prall wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think I can answer this one without violating NDA. MOSPF is not covered in the lab because Cisco has chosen not to support MOSPF in IOS. Surely you would agree that it is not easy to test something in the lab

RE: Switch Port Healthy [7:62567]

Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\) wrote: Hi Group, This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment whether the bandwidth is healthy? Thanks Bandwidth just means capacity. It can't be healthy or not healthy, although the amount of bandwith

Re: passed ccie written [7:62395]

Congrats Paul! I am preparing for the written also, but I confuse if it better for me to take CCIP first (because of MPLS topic) ? Does the written cover very in-depth in MPLS like the CCIP (MPLS) does ? or even more than that ? Coz, I'm still blur in MPLS. Thank's Regards, Christ A. -

Help with CCIE Study's!!! [7:62547]

I have been a Network Engineer for over 3 years and have my CCNP. I have been reading posts and researching about CCIE. I am fortunate enough to have a lab with 9 routers and a 2924 switch. I would love to get a 3550, voice and ATM, but like you too much $$$. Help!!! I am so intimidated. I don't

Re: ASBR ROUTER [7:62570]

The Long and Winding Road wrote: hanan wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... HELLO Could you please help me? I want to configure Cisco router series 2600 to enable OSPF and configure it as autonomous system border routers (ASBR) in one single area; the

CCIE study Group in Denver Area [7:62611]

All, I am looking for some study partners for CCIE in the Denver area. I have competed my CCNA and CCNP (Routing and switching) and plan to take the CCIE written by April first week and then get my lab by the year end. I am looking at forming a study group here in denver. This would be

CCIE books !!! [7:62612]

Group, I want to know what will be the complete set of books i need to go through before taking my CCIE routing and switching exam. What are some of the must-read books and/or papers that i should be reading? I already have my CCNA and CCNP. I work for a small startup service provider in

Re: CCIE books !!! [7:62613]

Basically, I am in the same boat. Same certs looking to move up to CCIE. Cisco recommends a myriad of books. But I have started off with A. Anthony Bruno's CCIE Routing and Switching. He covers the written test blue print going over all the topics listed in the blue print. Getting familiar with

URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on debug outputshere is the output... sh frame pvc PVC

Re: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

Cisco Nuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello, Is DVMRP covered at all in the new CCIE Lab? Any other new/odd topics? Ex. MRM or PGM?? Thank you. on a more serious note, suppose you were asked to connect one of the routers in your pod to a DVMRP source. Do

Off Topic - layers 8, 9, and 10 [7:62616]

When we last saw our hero ( yours truly ) he was up to his ears in a major AVVID deal. Lorda mercy, what a motherf* The customer RFP was crap, the turnaround time was cruel and unusual, and then when the bidders all came back with numbers in the high 8 million range, the customer threw us all

Cisco Call Manager backup question [7:62617]

Does any one know where I can find information about the Cisco Call Manager 3.2 backup utility? I am trying to find out what my backup tapes have on them. Thanks Tim Lipscombe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62617t=62617

Network Management Exam 9E0-300 [7:62618]

Hi, Anyone in the group who took up Network Management Exam. What kind of questions in this exam? Any tips is greatly appreciated. What book is necessary to prepare for this exam?? What is the passing percentage?? I am planning to take the exam come March. Again, thanks a lot for any tips.. Lew

MOSPF (was RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]

At 9:55 PM + 2/6/03, David C Prall wrote: I think I can answer this one without violating NDA. MOSPF is not covered in the lab because Cisco has chosen not to support MOSPF in IOS. Surely you would agree that it is not easy to test something in the lab that is not actually supported

Re: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

Dain, another day I had the same problem... In my case I was using a static route like this: ip route x.x.x.x mask serial0/1 when I changed to ip route x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y I got to solve the problem... You can try... Pedro A. do Valle Manaus - AM - Brazil 55 92 614 3105 - Original

RE: Cisco Call Manager backup question [7:62617]

Tim, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/install/b ackup/b_r321.htm has the information you are looking for... Pat -Original Message- From: Lipscombe, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Off Topic - layers 8, 9, and 10 [7:62616]

Layer 8 - politics, particularly of the customer layer 9 - politics - the sales account rep layer 10 - Cisco Many a great technicians have found themselves knee deep in brown fecal matter when above layer 7... HELP I'VE FALLEN AND CAN'T GET UP!!! Alas, it can be a horrible sight to behold.

RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

Dain Deutschman wrote: Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere... How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are you running a

Great Book..... [7:62625]

Team, I just finished reading for a second time Greene Smith's book Cisco ISP Essentials, It is a great book, to the point that you don't want to put it downThe format and methodology of the chapters and very easy to understand and be able to learn at the same time...It contain may examples in

RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]

Hi , I think the problem with routing issue as metioned by priscilla also and others. Either there is no route entry here i mean no static route to remote network if u are using static routing. and if dynamic u need to enter brodacst key word. and do check ur route -table like example in route

Re: T1 Csu dsu issue(commands) [7:62445]

Hi Dave, I was just trying installing and confguring T1 card and I found the commands wrong not working as per documentation. Thats why i was confuse and i thought I was wrong somewhere. thanx for clarification But has no body else observed what me and dave observed about t1 card. (The commands

Question on wireless Vlan Trunking BOOTPC issues -Please [7:62628]

I am setting up a wireless bridge and Access point to trunk 2 vlans - One is Vlan 11 ( Voice ), and One is default Vlan 1. Here is the issue. If on vlan 11, (by associated SSID mapped to vlan 11)wireless client (ip phone) gets a ip assigned by dhcp no problem in vlan 11. (dhcp server for the