RE: home lab equipment [7:75115]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I stopped buying long ago except isdn pbx, basics on routers at home, and started renting a few low budget ATM/VOICE etc. labs online. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dave Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 22:31 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Cisc SAFE Exam [7:75200]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saw some on the group a few weeks ago. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Fred Wittenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2003 20:15 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Cisc SAFE Exam [7:75200] Hello all, I'm planning on taking the SAFE exam to wrap up my

RE: Upgrading ROMMON on 2948G [7:75179]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCO customer? login http://ftp.cisco.com/cisco/lan/catalyst/4000/cat4000-releasenote.8-1-2.pdf 2 Release Notes for Catalyst 4500 Series Software Release 8.x OL-4502-02 ROMMON Requirements If the Boot ROM (ROMMON) loaded onto your switch is version 4.5(1) or earlier, you need to upgrade the

RE: BGP Table and SNMP [7:75016]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for per-Peer Received Routes Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alejandro Acosta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 3:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: BGP Table and SNMP [7:75016] Hi all, I wonder if any of you have succesfully retrieved the BGP table

RE: route add [7:75024]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 6:52 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: route add [7:75024] Dear All, I have a very stupit quesrtion here. How am i by pass the proxy and route direct to the router. Pls comment !! Below is my diagram. 169.168.4.2/16 (my pc) - router (192.168.161.254/16

RE: router CPU utilization on access lists? [7:75002]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So maybe permit and route to null0 in some cases? Then no unreachables are generated because there is a route? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Marty Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 september 2003 20:29 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: router CPU

Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75238]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K Frame router. They are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the ethernet side gets constant request for translation then it gets to the point where you can no longer even ping the ethernet side. If I remove the RG45 cable from

RE: Network Benchmarking/Performance Analysis [7:74808]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe also sniffer (distributed), nice reports, ready for excel or the beamer (CEO-ready.. ;-)) Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 4 september 2003 19:17 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Network Benchmarking/Performance

RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 18:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: NAT and SAP [7:74982] When a SAP client tries to connect to a SAP server through a router with NAT enabled there is a problem: the SAP server sends an IP embedded

RE: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will say multicast. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Devrim Yener KUCUK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 16:38 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: OSPF demand-circuit does not work [7:74954] what do you see when you do sh dialer

RE: NAT and SAP [7:74982]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 18:50 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: NAT and SAP [7:74982] When a SAP client tries to connect to a SAP server through a router with NAT enabled there is a problem: the SAP server sends an IP embedded

RE: EM VoIP Problem [7:74717]

2003-09-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: lost in space [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 3 september 2003 18:03 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: EM VoIP Problem [7:74717] Dear Experts, I am having this problem with EM VoIP. We are using an EM PABX operating with 4 wire and using immediate signalling. The network

delivery error (Thank you! , attachment name [7:75032]

2003-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
machine to make sure this attachment was not generated by a virus/worm. thanks Original message header follows: -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 9 17:11:30 2003 Return-Path: Received: from INBRO228 (251.besecure.net.au

RE: CCNP exam changes...... [7:75044]

2003-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been working toward my CCNP for sometime. But Cisco have changed the exams twice recently. As my CCNA is only valid until Dec 6th this year, does this mean I'll have to do it all over again ?? Thx Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75044t=75044

RE: Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909]

2003-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 modem InOut What about modem out? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 september 2003 17:49 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909] Guys, If I have

failure notice [7:75084]

2003-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mx4.jmail.co.jp. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the message.

RE: PIX PDM [7:74758]

2003-09-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gary Leong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 4 september 2003 4:09 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: PIX PDM [7:74758] Our security group is recommending not to use PDM to configure our Pix firewalls. They did not give any reason

RE: EtherChannel On Cat6500 [7:74944]

2003-09-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. Pagp per card, as far as i know. rethink the port layout. Why not layer 3 resilience, different chassis? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Devraj, Prem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 10:19 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: EtherChannel

RE: EtherChannel On Cat6500 [7:74944]

2003-09-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, more of a 2950 kind a guy. Question is, do you want to do that? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Georgescu, Aurelian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 8 september 2003 14:37 Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: EtherChannel On Cat6500 [7:74944

Re: Cisco ICS 7750 experiences [7:75005]

2003-09-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keep it simple: ONE SITE - ONE Partition, ONE GW, ONE Call Search Space, Etc.. Test with a group of 4 -5 phones with a single POTS line and make sure all of your services (voicemail, transfer, 7 - digit calls, long distance,) works and use the same template for all your IP phones using the

RE: IP expert's RS workbook [7:74849]

2003-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Raj Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 september 2003 4:19 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: IP expert's RS workbook [7:74849] Anyone willing to share there IP experts RS workbook or pitch in to get it together? Raj

RE: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722]

2003-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe dumb, but what about the fixed layer 3 int? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Hanna, Keith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 3 september 2003 18:53 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: SNMP on a Dialer interface [7:74722] Hi, I'm running MRTG to provide bandwidth

the 642 exams and CCNA re-cert [7:74892]

2003-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I have read, any exam with a 642 prefix renews your CCNA.Can anyone validate that? Regards, Ajay Chenampara Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74892t=74892 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from

506 Flash Damaged [7:74895]

2003-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I have a 506 with damaged flash. Is there any way I can boot from TFTP, or any other solution ??? I have looked at Cisco site and my books but cannot find a solution. Otherwise I guess its fit for the bin, unless I can get someone to replace the Flash chip. Kind regards Paul. Message

RE: 640-604 Passing Score? [7:74698]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My certificate says the passing score was 776 and I sneaked in with 815. How Cisco come up with the numbers is a subject all of its own. Cheers, Steve Wilson CCNP CCDA Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Caxton The [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 03:18 To: [EMAIL

Cisco ATM module [7:74707]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Were interested in buying some used Cisco equipment. Specifically we are interested in ATM modules for the Cisco 4500/4700 router. Either the NP-1A-MM (multi mode) or NP-1A-SM (single mode) modules. Please let us know if you have anything available. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neu

Cisco ATM module [7:74707]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Were interested in buying some used Cisco equipment. Specifically we are interested in ATM modules for the Cisco 4500/4700 router. Either the NP-1A-MM (multi mode) or NP-1A-SM (single mode) modules. Please let us know if you have anything available. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neu

OT: Cable Lengths [7:74776]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a question regarding the max length for a 100BaseT cable. Granted I haven't done a wealth of research on this so feel free to point me to google if the answer is mind numbingly simple, which it probably is I have always understood the 100M limitation on 10BaseT ethernet cable to be

RE: NM-1CT1 or WIC-1DSU-T1 [7:74741]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Along similar lines - can you directly interconnect two WIC-1DSU-T1 interfaces via serial cable? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of neal rauhauser Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NM-1CT1 or WIC

Re: Wicked screensaver [7:74792]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the attached file for details. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74792t=74792 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and

RE: 3640 Router [7:74783]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 3640 can in theory but cannot really support a DS3 circuit at full speed..hence the 3745s will quickly take over the market for 3640s.. -Original Message- From: Cappuccio Victor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3640

RE: Calls made by DNS [7:74785]

2003-09-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the Cisco.com web page for the commands and the IOS revision needed. Cheers, Steve Wilson CCNP CCDA Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Wayne Brewster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 September 2003 14:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Calls made by DNS [7:74785] Hello group, I have

RE: 640-604 Passing Score? [7:74698]

2003-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My certificate says the passing score was 776 and I sneaked in with 815. How Cisco come up with the numbers is a subject all of its own. Cheers, Steve Wilson CCNP CCDA Network Engineer -Original Message- From: Caxton The [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 September 2003 03:18 To: [EMAIL

Cisco ATM module [7:74707]

2003-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Were interested in buying some used Cisco equipment. Specifically we are interested in ATM modules for the Cisco 4500/4700 router. Either the NP-1A-MM (multi mode) or NP-1A-SM (single mode) modules. Please let us know if you have anything available. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neu

Re: SOS:Load Balance with CSS 11500 [7:74538]

2003-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larisa cc: Sent by: Subject: SOS:Load Balance with CSS 11500 [7:74538] [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: 2620XM vs. 1721 Routers [7:74727]

2003-09-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are many features you may not get with the 1721 - you also may not need them so why spend the extra money on the 2620XM for a simple serial connection. Just my .02 Ian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Wednesday

Autoreply to Re: That movie [7:74628]

2003-09-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an automated response to your mail CD Freaks Forum Helpdesk - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://club.cdfreaks.com Dear visitor, Thank you

NM-8AM synch. support [7:74648]

2003-09-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Does NM-8AM or WIC-1AM modules support sync. Connection? Thanks regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74648t=74648 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:

Re: Cisco ICS 7750 experiences [7:74578]

2003-09-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Hugo I am prepare the same project, would you pls give me a suggestion? thnaks! Stone - Original Message - From: To: ; Cc: Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: Re: Cisco ICS 7750 experiences I just deployed one for a single site manufacturing new construction.

failure notice [7:74614]

2003-09-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at casper.sri.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : 130.107.1.30 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown Giving up on

RE: Catalyst 6500 Architecture [7:74460]

2003-08-30 Thread \\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\
The SFM is a piece of junk...and not as useful as you might seem... The new Supervisor 720 has the SFM built-in...which greatly enhances its use.. -Original Message- From: neil K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Catalyst

802.3x switch traffic disruption [7:74455]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need some expert option on the following matter: I have a Netgear Fast Ethernet Switch FS608 (which does 802.3x Flow control) connected to a DLink 5 port switch (no flow control) Twice this week, the FS608 locked itself causing ALL traffic in the company to be disrupted. The problem was

Re: Cisco ICS 7750 experiences [7:74481]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just deployed one for a single site manufacturing new construction. 150 IP phones 7940s / 7960s, IPCC, Unity Unified, etc. It took me about two days to get all of the builds completed because of the patches you have to add, but I got it configured pretty quick and, once it was up and I was

RE: Re: Thank you! [7:74488]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email that you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not reach the intended receipient due to existance of virus. Kindly have your computer check for virus. Best Regards, Mail Administrator Datacraft Asia Ltd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: Re: Your application [7:74449]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email that you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not reach the intended receipient due to existance of virus. Kindly have your computer check for virus. Best Regards, Mail Administrator Datacraft Asia Ltd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: Flash [7:74491]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried some nasty things from rommon trough the console a few times, So booting to rommon and whiping the whole thing from there would help you further, then tftp upgrade/reload the image you want. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: PPC-DAT Ep-Ng-Ist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Catalyst 6500 Architecture [7:74460]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The SFM is a piece of junk...and not as useful as you might seem... The new Supervisor 720 has the SFM built-in...which greatly enhances its use.. -Original Message- From: neil K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Catalyst

RE: TCP/UDP port for CHAP [7:74480]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
neg IP) and that is where you want to put an incoming access-list on. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Thomas N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 29 augustus 2003 11:31 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: TCP/UDP port for CHAP [7:74480] I got SOHO sites with PPPoE

Re: 802.3x switch traffic disruption [7:74455]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it. And one final comment, if you really need to be flow controlling traffic, perhaps you should just upgrade the bandwidth? Ethernet flow control sounds like a bandaid over a design problem to me What do others think? Do you use 802.3x flow control? Thanks. Priscilla [EMAIL

Re: 802.3x switch traffic disruption [7:74455]

2003-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is at first surprising to their customers. If you want more information about my experiences with vendors and their implementations of 802.3x, continue to read. ...and it goes on, at some length. FWIW Annlee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I don't think I have a design issue: the network

Your details [7:74297]

2003-08-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the attached file for details. [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of wicked_scr.scr] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74297t=74297 -- **Please support

ATM and Rate-limiting [7:74438]

2003-08-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it popssible to use rate-limit command on an ATM interface? Thanks, Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (321) 309-1410 888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74438t=74438

RE: BCRAN 2.0 questions [7:13450]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2003 02:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCRAN 2.0 questions [1:13450] I have a couple questions on a real BCRAN exam, I got 740 ( passing score is 790 ) on a new BCRAN test. I going to take it again soon, I just need help to clear up some questions before I do it again

RE: LLC1 and LLC2 (What is the difference?) [7:74341]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brilliant - thx -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 August 2003 18:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: LLC1 and LLC2 (What is the difference?) [7:74341] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone enlighten me on this? From Troubleshooting

RE: 1000BaseT GBIC [7:74392]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Nima Javidi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 augustus 2003 10:54 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: 1000BaseT GBIC [7:74392] Is 1000BaseT GBIC Autosense? Is it Support 10/100/1000? **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing

RE: Load Balancing; help explain [7:74376]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 (nic) or layer 3 (routers or w2k NLB). Define your critical service (availability), go from there to capacity(load). This is the real stuff. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Aspiring Cisco Gurl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 augustus 2003 5:01 Aan

RE: PIX VPN Client Configuration - At my wit's end! [7:74363]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the client is checked against this list. So must be more specific in my experience. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Derek Gaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 augustus 2003 9:57 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: PIX VPN Client Configuration - At my wit's end

RE: Metric of OSPF Summary Routes [7:74361]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please show us the topology database, that should tell us all. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 26 augustus 2003 0:10 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Metric of OSPF Summary Routes [7:74361] Is there a way to define

RE: Re: Re: My details [7:74400]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] The email that you sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not reach the intended receipient due to existance of virus. Kindly have your computer check for virus. Best Regards, Mail Administrator Datacraft Asia Ltd Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f

RE: Re: Thank you! [7:74408]

2003-08-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Delivery Failure Your message failed to pass Hitachi Data Systems anti-virus scanning system. If you believe this message was received in error please consult your HItachi Data Systems contact or the intended email recipient for further assistance. Message Posted at:

RE: ooking for CCIE practice test. What boson test is the best [7:74326]

2003-08-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not be afraid to buy two. Authors have a different point of view. DO NOT forget the written blueprint. Dennis is also very good. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: johnman johnman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: zaterdag 23 augustus 2003 5:02 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp

LLC1 and LLC2 (What is the difference?) [7:74341]

2003-08-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone enlighten me on this? Many thx indeed For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group

RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about mobile IP or VPN to border router and get an internal IP for the tftp server's point of view... Just in a typing mood. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 18 augustus 2003 15:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: BGP

RE: PIX xlate question [7:74012]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
100. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Skarphedinsson Arni V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 18 augustus 2003 15:52 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: PIX xlate question [7:74012] Here are the Global and NAT statements global (outside) 1 213.213.128.100

RE: Data Center Design [7:74126]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 18 augustus 2003 23:22 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Data Center Design [7:74126] Team, Where will I be able to find information about designing a Data Center Room. As always I appreciate your help and recommendation. Thanks, Juan **Please support

RE: Cisco Wireless [7:74157]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want check that the association is encrypted, try checking the association table. For checking that traffic is encrypted try Airopeek, Airsnort etc. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 10:31 Aan

RE: Data Center Design [7:74126]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) Ladder rack, cable tray and cable management installation.. and software /documentation -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 12:55 Aan: Jansen, M Onderwerp: RE: Data

RE: PIX and Router Setup Question [7:74141]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for intrusions/reactions, use it and update it! See SAFE website. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns170/ns171/ns128/networking_solutio ns_package.html Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Joel Satterley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 11:25 Aan

RE: ISDN dialer rotatry groups [7:74159]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can assign your physical interfaces to different rotary groups and thus to dialer interfaces. PLS Tell us about you hunt-group number-plan, so we can continue on this. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 11:49 Aan

RE: DSL over Dry Copper [7:74117]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/products_data_sheet091 86a0080088894.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps605/products_data_sheet091 86a0080088894.html Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dain Deutschman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 18 augustus 2003 21:05 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: DSL

RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not completely on topic, sorry It is about a router, not a pc box. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jansen, M Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 8:15 Aan: Eddie; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100] What about mobile IP or VPN to border

RM Process? [7:74198]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0 SERIAL A'detect [snip] Thanks, Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (321) 309-1410 888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74198t=74198

RM Process? [7:74198]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0 SERIAL A'detect [snip] Thanks, Mario Puras SoluNet Technical Support Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (321) 309-1410 888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives

OSPF Cost [7:74098]

2003-08-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys, Just to confirm that this is the correct costing default for OSPF :- 10*8 (1,,) \ bandwidth in kbps BW 1000 Kbit - 10Gig = OSPF Cost 10 BW 100 Kbit - 1Gig= OSPF Cost 100 BW 10 Kbit - 100Meg = OSPF Cost 1000 BW1 Kbit - 10Meg = OSPF Cost 1 BW

RE: Trying run ISIS on 2600 [7:74051]

2003-08-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISIS is part of the Enterprise code. Upgrading to that will allow you to configure ISIS. Thanks, Ian www.ccie4u.com Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios starting at $20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of irfan siddiqui Sent: Saturday, August 16

RE: 3750 Capability [7:73989]

2003-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
triggers an event, which can generate a log entry or an SNMP trap. Event (RMON group 9)-Determines the action to take when an event is triggered by an alarm. The action can be to generate a log entry or an SNMP trap. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Azhar Teza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Line Redundancy [7:73931]

2003-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 12 augustus 2003 19:38 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Line Redundancy [7:73931] Hi all, I need some Line or Internet redundancy for a relatively small network. We currently have a SDSL line from speakeasy which resells Covad. I need another type of line

RE: hsrp and icmp redirects [7:73972]

2003-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do all incoming routes/gateway branchoffice routes look? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Robert Kimble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 14 augustus 2003 16:57 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: hsrp and icmp redirects [7:73972] Ok. I'll try to explain what

RE: PIX xlate question [7:74012]

2003-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLS give, just to be sure, Global and NAT statements. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Skarphedinsson Arni V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 15 augustus 2003 12:34 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: PIX xlate question [7:74012] why would I see the folowing when I do

RE: PIX timeout uauth [7:73995]

2003-08-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simer, I always leave all timers standard. That works. I keep PIXOS versions in sync. When you ping from site 2 in the morning, tunnel should also come up. Double check all the access-lists/peer statements. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Simer Mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: traffic flow [7:73495]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what i said, use a ws with SNIFFER in between, INSTANT graphs. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Doan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 22:11 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: traffic flow [7:73495] Netlfow would be your best way

FW: cisco back to back cable [7:71992]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or maybe try alternating the dce/dte settings on the serial interfaces -Original Message- From: LINSEN Jurgen (BMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 09:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Sure you're using a cross cable

RE: Access Internet via the corporate PIX [7:73563]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bericht- Van: johnman johnman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 5 augustus 2003 23:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Access Internet via the corporate PIX [7:73563] I am building a vpn tunnel PIX-to-PIX both connected to the internet. I would like theusers at the remote site

RE: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It does. It is IOS. Just do your CLI thing. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 17:21 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Cisco 806 ? [7:73613] Hi, for some tests I need something cheap to play with, having 2

RE: IOS image.... [7:73481]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buy online cco when you're partner/subscribe http://shop.cisco.com Subscribtions should have latest. Maybe ebay? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Shab Hanon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 21:47 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: IOS image

RE: Networkers 2002 PDFs [7:73522] (LINKS READY FOR DOWNLOAD!) [7:73596]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-360.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-440.pdf http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/post/presentations/docs/RST-450.pdf Cheers Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jens Petter Eikeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] ENGLISH version, so to [7:73714]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jansen, M Verzonden: vrijdag 8 augustus 2003 12:36 Aan: 'LINSEN Jurgen (BMB)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp

RE: a token ring question [7:73908]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Token Ring interface 0 to be mapped to MAC address 0xc000.0004.: interface token 0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip pim dense-mode ip multicast use-functional Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: wj chou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 12 augustus 2003 7:55

RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Router 2600 b Connecting WAN and Voice Interface Cards to a Network Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 7:53 Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] That is a ADSL

RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 3:57 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] You are right it is a service offering. Right now, we are using ISDN dial-up and would like to move to a full time connection. We would not be using the customerbs

Re: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: 2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in? Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window. Unless you're Microsoft. http://grotto11.com/blog/slash.html?+1039831658 This isn't to make this a

RE: what are ip directed-broadcast and ip mroute-cache [7:73842]

2003-08-14 Thread \\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\
A quick explanation- please add on... Mroute is for the multicast routing table... Ip directed-boradcast allows a host to direct a physical broadcast to a specific subnet it only effects broadcast medium... -Original Message- From: Iwan Hoogendoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) ander is dte geen clockrate Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: LINSEN Jurgen (BMB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 augustus 2003 9:37 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Sure you're using a cross cable? -Original Message

RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Verzonden: zondag 10 augustus 2003 4:36 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] I need to setup VPNs to about 2000 sites. Each site will have an IDSL line installed that will be used to connect to monitor network devices and servers. Some of the remote

New Remote Access exam 642-821 vs the old current exam BCRAN [7:73592]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello All, Has anybody taken the Beta Remote Access 642-821 exam? Does anybody know whether the new exams has X.25 and TACACS+ included in it as Cisco.com does not have it as one of the exam objectives listed. The new exam has VPN and DSL included. Pooven Message Posted at:

Want a spam-friendly mailbox? [7:73856]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want a spam-friendly mailbox? Call 1-480-946-1462 and leave your name, email address and phone number. You may also click REPLY to this address and provide your full details. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73856t=73856

RE: Gigabit Ethernet Collisions [7:73555]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have a setup you would like to share? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Neil Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 2:06 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: Gigabit Ethernet Collisions [7:73555] This would be when you are using the Gigastack

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] OT:F funny [7:73722]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 15:33 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] Does anyone read the manuals around here??? http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123

RE: 2x2610 vs 2600 + 3640: WAS Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73953]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Ian http://www.ccie4u.com Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios starting at $20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 2x2610 vs 2600 + 3640: WAS Re: CCIE Lab Setup [7:73612] From what I have

RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT: [7:73882]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc that if you make a quicky of business req's you'll pay afterwards, because it is not what customer had hoped for Trusted -untrusted client sites. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 11 augustus 2003 16:02 Aan: Jansen

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >