Re: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75285]

2003-09-11 Thread MADMAN
--Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem >>[7:75238] >> >> >>I have a customer that has a

RE: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75277]

2003-09-11 Thread Andrew Larkins
ernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem > [7:75238] > > > I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K > Frame router. > They > are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the > ethernet side gets > constant request for translation the

RE: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75263]

2003-09-11 Thread Daniel Cotts
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem > [7:75238] > > > I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K > Frame router. > They > are runni

Ethernet bogs down help has anyone seen this problem [7:75238]

2003-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the frame side. No problem the request stop and I can ping my ethernet side of the router fine with 10ml sec responses all day. The users office is down because he can not get out to the web. I've checked for viruses and everything seems fine. Does anyone have any ideas? This one is drivi

RE: E&M VoIP Problem [7:74717]

2003-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: lost in space [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 3 september 2003 18:03 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: E&M VoIP Problem [7:74717] Dear Experts, I am having this problem with E&M VoIP. We are using an E&M PABX operating with 4 wire and using immediate signalling. The

RE: CDP problem [7:74949]

2003-09-08 Thread Ben W
I don't think the Frame swich should have a CDP entry for the directly conencted neighbors. Your Frame sites that are connected to each other VIA the frame switch should, for example R2 should have a CDP entry for its spokes, and the spokes should see R2. Remember that CDP is a layer 2 protocol,

RE: CDP problem [7:74949]

2003-09-08 Thread Jesse Loggins
What does show CDP nei give you? If you recieve Router#show cdp neighbors % CDP is not enabled This is self explainatory The CDP run command should solve that. If you get this then maybe your remote router does not have CDP enabled Router#show cdp neighbors Capability Codes: R - Router, T - T

CDP problem [7:74949]

2003-09-08 Thread Iwan Hoogendoorn
Hi people of Groupstudy, I have a little problem with CDP. I have a problem with CDP over Frame relay connectivity but i have no CLUE what the problem is I have an HUB AND SPOKE 4 routers are connected to the frame switch The Frame switch has no CDP information (how is this possible?) R2

DNS Problem [7:74890]

2003-09-05 Thread Router Kid
Guys, I am having problem resolving DNS names. I have a Cisco 2600 and configured for right name-servers and domain name, but I am still unable to ping www.yahoo.com from my router and a unix box. My router/unix is behind a PIX firewall. I also created an ACL to allow outbound conections to my

2950 problem (see my previous post) [7:74842]

2003-09-04 Thread Pintens, Koen
Hi here is an extract from a test we are able to run C3 System IO Registers test CALHOUN SKU id 0: 24 Fast Ethernet Ports, 0 Gigabit ports cmic_read_miim ERROR: timeout (addr=0x01 id=0x00) cmic_read_miim: error (could not read MII register #1). ERROR: CALHOUN SKU id 0: 0 ports found, 24 ports

RE: BGP PEERGROUP PROBLEM [7:74725]

2003-09-03 Thread Chibwe, Oliver J, NEO
03, 2003 12:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP PEERGROUP PROBLEM [7:74725] Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I checked the filter list but that does not seem to be the pro

Re: BGP PEERGROUP PROBLEM [7:74725]

2003-09-03 Thread John Neiberger
Perhaps a config would be helpful. Or do you expect us to use our psychic abilities to determine the problem? ;-) >>> JMC Nel 9/3/03 12:29:06 PM >>> Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving

BGP PEERGROUP PROBLEM [7:74725]

2003-09-03 Thread JMC Nel
Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I checked the filter list but that does not seem to be the problem. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. Thanks GP

E&M VoIP Problem [7:74717]

2003-09-03 Thread lost in space
Dear Experts, I am having this problem with E&M VoIP. We are using an E&M PABX operating with 4 wire and using immediate signalling. The network are connected via 2 Mbps Leased Line. I can make voice calls from my site to remote site, however when i asked someone from the remote site

Re: Serial line problem [7:74530]

2003-08-29 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
Jeroen Timmer wrote: > Don't those 2 clockrates have to be the same, 511680 looks good to me for a > 512kb line? And does this problem point > to the Telco who has a problem with their clockrate ?? Yeah, that's what it looks like. Your first router isn't getting a clock

Serial line problem [7:74530]

2003-08-29 Thread Jeroen Timmer
Hi all, Small problem We got an update today from 128kb to 512kb leased line. We got 2 3640 routers, 1 on each end off the leased line . IOS on first 3640 12.0(13) on second 3640 router 12.0(4). Both routers have a NM-4T module. On first router: All is up, DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up

Re: FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on [7:74294]

2003-08-24 Thread Zsombor Papp
John wrote: > > Everyone, > I have found the solution. It was to do with my > phones. If > you connect a non US phone to port 0 it wont work :) I might be reading this wrong, but IMHO this document says that port 1 won't work if you connect a US-style phone (or one that looks like

Re: FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on either [7:74294]

2003-08-24 Thread John
Everyone, I have found the solution. It was to do with my phones. If you connect a non US phone to port 0 it wont work :) Here is a url that might help anyone else in the future. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094fac.shtml The information

RE: problem after upgrading 3620 IOS [7:74160]

2003-08-24 Thread Northgatenet
If the .bin file is not larger than 16M, and your system meets the requirements, go to the following link: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1828/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca550.html Good Luck! /northgatenet Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form

Re: FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on [7:74285]

2003-08-24 Thread Northgatenet
The only thing that I could see that was not done is as follows: Create a Loopback0 Interface on each router say "135.25.2.1 & 135.25.0.1 Have the Session Target > point to each others Loopback rather than the Serial Interface OSPF was used with an inverted mask in which this IP Scope includes a

Re: FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on either [7:74285]

2003-08-24 Thread Erick B.
What voice ports are the phones plugged into physically? Maybe you have phone in port x/y/1 instead of x/y/0. 'show voice port port#' will give details on voice port status too. You may want to do a 'csim start ' or 'csim start ' to see if the router with that phone actually rings (don't h

FXS Problem - Always getting a busy signal on either router. [7:74283]

2003-08-23 Thread Maria
GDay Everyone, Just hoping you all may be able to shed some light onto this for me. This is the fist time I have tired to configure FXS ports and its proving to be getting the better of me. I have 2 routers (2610XM) connected together via a serial back to back. in each of th

RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not completely on topic, sorry It is about a router, not a pc box. Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jansen, M Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 8:15 Aan: Eddie; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100] What about mobile IP or VPN to border

RE: problem after upgrading 3620 IOS [7:74160]

2003-08-19 Thread Andrew Larkins
Message- From: star star7 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 August 2003 11:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: problem after upgrading 3620 IOS [7:74160] i get a message that memory is not enough for decompressing the IOS image after upgrading my 3620 with 12.2 IOS , but i have 32MB DRAM , and

Re: problem after upgrading 3620 IOS [7:74160]

2003-08-19 Thread Manuel Rojas
, it says you have to manually set the memory space , what is the > problem , how i do it > > previous IOS was 11.1 > **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gro

problem after upgrading 3620 IOS [7:74160]

2003-08-19 Thread star star7
i get a message that memory is not enough for decompressing the IOS image after upgrading my 3620 with 12.2 IOS , but i have 32MB DRAM , and 16MB flash , it says you have to manually set the memory space , what is the problem , how i do it previous IOS was 11.1 Message Posted at: http

RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100] Matthew Webster wrote: > Hi all, > > I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as > follows: > > TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2 > > s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1

Re: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-18 Thread Matthew Webster
HI Eddie, Fred, thanks for your help...I think this most likely is the problem. As I do not have access to teh TFTP server, I am unable to fix it though. cheers, Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74130&

RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-18 Thread Reimer, Fred
email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Matthew Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100] Hi all, I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com

Re: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-18 Thread Eddie
Matthew Webster wrote: > Hi all, > > I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as > follows: > > TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2 > > s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1/24. > > The problem is that wh

BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]

2003-08-18 Thread Matthew Webster
Hi all, I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as follows: TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2 s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1/24. The problem is that while I can ping the TFTP server (10.1.4.3 from Rtr1's e0 interfac

Re: AAA/privilege problem [7:73610]

2003-08-14 Thread ccie study
e" To your console line, you will not be able to access. 2 you're missing privilege in your user commands. "username user2 privilege 2 password cisco". That should fix 2nd issue. >From: "Jens Petter Eikeland" >Reply-To: "Jens Petter Eikeland" &

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Onderwerp: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] hi all, I am trying to setup a easy VPN solution for a cisco 837 to a cisco VPN concentrator 3005 using network extension mode but I keep getting this error msg "Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN(mendelvpn): Pending XAuth Request, Please enter the foll

Re: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Owens
4000 even though their 65000 ports available > > From: "Lynne Padgett" > Date: 2003/08/08 Fri AM 11:11:01 EDT> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] > > Greg Owens 202-398-2552 [GroupStudy removed an attachment with a content

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] OT:F funny [7:73722]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 15:33 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] Does anyone read the manuals around here??? http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/io

RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-08-14 Thread Reimer, Fred
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] What is the maximum number of translations in a global pool on a PIX? I didn't realize there was a cap. I was under the impression that the number of translations was directly related to the PIX user/connection license. -O

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 9:40 Aan: Jansen, M Onderwerp: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] thanks for your prompt reply , but I am using easyvpn configuration for cisco 805 router to concentrator 3005 with the cisco 805 as client mode and concentrator as hub

RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-08-14 Thread Reimer, Fred
ly on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: Greg Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX translation problem [7:72567] have anybody seen this message. 07-15-2003 13:

Re: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-08-14 Thread Greg Owens
changing the timeout value worked, so the problem is fixed Thanks all > > From: "Reimer, Fred" > Date: 2003/08/08 Fri AM 11:26:37 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] > > Greg Owens 202-398-2552 [GroupStudy removed an

RE: IP Multicast Problem in relation to Reuters Xtra30 [7:73465]

2003-08-10 Thread Doan Nguyen
I doubt that this is a bandwidth issue because unless you have some sort of QoS for your multicasting, the news simply doesn't get dropped over the price update. The 3 minute time limit when the news traffic drops sounds like a dense mode problem with the flood-prune every 3 minutes. Ar

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-10 Thread suaveguru
thanks for your reply , I will read the documentation and see if I can solve my problem --- "Reimer, Fred" wrote: > Does anyone read the manuals around here??? > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/secu > r_r/sec_c2g.htm#1070272 >

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-10 Thread suaveguru
.255.255 > no-xauth no-config-mode > > > > Martijn > > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 7:08 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] > > >

RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-08-09 Thread Lynne Padgett
ECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX translation problem [7:72567] No, but I know what it means. What kind of NAT are you doing? A global pool, or a single address doing PAT? If it's a pool, then you can define a single address (or interface)

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-08 Thread Joel Satterley
1 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] XAUTH is in my perception for authentication of users, (local) escpecially radius or tacacs. So what we do at the hub site for a static IKE peer is disable XAUTH, so that a spoke router does not get an auth prompt, or the hub does not

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-07 Thread Reimer, Fred
8 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] hi all, I am trying to setup a easy VPN solution for a cisco 837 to a cisco VPN concentrator 3005 using network extension mode but I keep getting this error msg "Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN(mendelvpn): Pending XAuth Request, Please

RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-07 Thread suaveguru
> Van: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 7 augustus 2003 9:40 > Aan: Jansen, M > Onderwerp: RE: Strange VPN problem [7:73641] > > > thanks for your prompt reply , but I am using > easyvpn > configuration for cisco 805 router to concentrato

Strange VPN problem [7:73641]

2003-08-07 Thread suaveguru
hi all, I am trying to setup a easy VPN solution for a cisco 837 to a cisco VPN concentrator 3005 using network extension mode but I keep getting this error msg "Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN(mendelvpn): Pending XAuth Request, Please enter the following command: Aug 7 13:08:16.571: EZVPN: crypto ip

SV: AAA/privilege problem [7:73611]

2003-08-06 Thread Eikeland, Jens Petter
utho >authorization exec loc_autho >accounting commands 3 ac_tacacs >accounting commands 15 ac_tacacs >accounting exec ac_tacacs -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: ccie study [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 6. august 2003 16:56 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne

SV: AAA/privilege problem [7:73618]

2003-08-06 Thread Eikeland, Jens Petter
t; -Opprinnelig melding- > Fra: ccie study [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 6. august 2003 16:56 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: AAA/privilege problem > > > 1 privilege exec level 2 enable > > Is why console doesn'

IP Multicast Problem in relation to Reuters Xtra3000 apps [7:73465]

2003-08-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone shed some light on this problem? We are doing remote WAN multicast under a PIM Auto-RP environment. The remote Xtra3000 client will stop updating the News within 3 mins from launch. However, the price update will not stop no matter how long it runs. Looks like multicast is working

mutlihoming problem with grapgh [7:73233]

2003-07-30 Thread Ali Al-Sayyed
Hi all i have the following setup so I am please if any body can help me for configuration or if it possible to implement or not and how. We have this customer and we need to apply load sharing with automatic failover (take in consideration the customer have firewall) . so did any body know how I

RE: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

2003-07-29 Thread Reimer, Fred
erada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RES: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098] maybe something in the switch . . . are both routers active , noone in standby ? > _ > Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 &

RES: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

2003-07-28 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
2003 10:58 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Assunto: RE: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098] > > Try > > Where they also give you an alternative to use the burned HW in-address > instead of a virtual HW address. > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/6

RE: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

2003-07-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D] Verzonden: maandag 28 juli 2003 13:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098] Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is connected into our 2950 along with a firewall. >

RE: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

2003-07-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098] Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is connected into our 2950 along with a firewall. >From the switch, or firewall, I can ping either

HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

2003-07-28 Thread Tim Champion
Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is connected into our 2950 along with a firewall. >From the switch, or firewall, I can ping either of the 'real' ip addresses but not the virtual address. I

SRC and DST NAT problem [7:72783]

2003-07-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem description: Problem when NATing both source and destination addresses based on an route-map Diagram: _ | R1| | | - | | Fa0/0.1

Re: PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-07-20 Thread Bikespace
Sorry to give one of those annoying answers. I saw this a couple of weeks ago while configuring a Pix. I looked at the config and I had typo'd. Unfortunately I can't remember what I'd done wrong at the time. Can you post the config and it may jog my memory. Regards, Bikespace ""Greg Owens"" wr

RE: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]

2003-07-19 Thread Wilmes, Rusty
003 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621] I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.) Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t

Re: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]

2003-07-19 Thread Jonathan V Hays
e 0Invalid Lock Shift 0 > Invalid Information ID 0Invalid Report IE Len 0 > Invalid Report Request 0Invalid Keep IE Len 0 > Num Status Enq. Sent 19Num Status msgs Rcvd 12 > Num Update Status Rcvd 0Num Status Timeouts 8 Without actually being there, it sounds like a cloc

need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]

2003-07-19 Thread Wilmes, Rusty
I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.) Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t1 wics on fractional frame lines. Remotes have existing pvcs back to the 3640 on the production network.

PIX translation problem [7:72567]

2003-07-18 Thread Greg Owens
have anybody seen this message. 07-15-2003 13:55:38Local4.Error192.168.1.1 Jul 15 2003 09:53:35: %PIX-3-202001: Out of address translation slots! I told the customer to change the translation time-out Greg Owens 202-398-2552 [GroupStudy removed an attachment with a conte

RE: SPAN problem [7:72507]

2003-07-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Paul wrote: > > Hi all, > > Quick question, I have enabled SPAN to mirror from one port to > another. > However, when doing so the transmitting port appears detached > form the > network. i.e.. I cannot ping from the PC attached to that port > and nothing on > the network can ping it too. When I

SPAN problem [7:72507]

2003-07-17 Thread Paul
Hi all, Quick question, I have enabled SPAN to mirror from one port to another. However, when doing so the transmitting port appears detached form the network. i.e.. I cannot ping from the PC attached to that port and nothing on the network can ping it too. When I remove the port from the session

RE: STP problem [7:70797]

2003-07-17 Thread Reimer, Fred
t authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: STP proble

RE: STP problem [7:70797]

2003-07-17 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
was a problem was when the user would try to access the internet. After a week of troubleshooting, we started looking at all of the PCs that had been installed recently. It was pure luck that we found it. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread Reimer, Fred
close, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer. -Original Message- From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: console port problem [7:72298] Perhaps a co

RE: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
Perhaps a copy of the running config would help -Original Message- From: star star7 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: console port problem [7:72298] i cannot use my console port to access one of my 2524 router as well as

Re: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread Reza
Can you describe the problem? Reza ""star.7"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > i have a problem with my console port of 2500 router as well as 1900 switch > > > the speed settings are ok > > > can you help me > > > > > &

RE: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread Robert Perez
whats the problem?? -Original Message- From: star.7 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: console port problem [7:72298] i have a problem with my console port of 2500 router as well as 1900 switch the speed settings are ok

Re: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread star star7
i cannot use my console port to access one of my 2524 router as well as 1900 switch , they don't respond but i can telnet to them. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72316&t=72298 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread star.7
i have a problem with my console port of 2500 router as well as 1900 switch the speed settings are ok can you help me Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy The Best In BOOKS at http://www.bestsellers.indiatimes.com Bid for Air Tickets @ Re

Re: problem with 7206 router. [7:72177]

2003-07-12 Thread Brian
hmm wonder if the config specifies a tftp boot of the image specified in that error? Tried removingthe config? Brian The path to a desireable destination is often more difficult than the path to stay where you are. On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Zsombor Papp wrote: > Default solution is to boot

Re: problem with 7206 router. [7:72177]

2003-07-12 Thread Zsombor Papp
Default solution is to boot up the image on the flash card, format bootflash, and copy a new bootloader image onto it, but you might need just remove a few files from bootflash: so that the bootloader is the first file. What does 'show bootflash:' show? Thanks, Zsombor At 08:23 AM 7/12/2003 +

problem about OSPF on environment NBMA [7:72181]

2003-07-12 Thread ht ht
Dear all, I would like ask how to config "cost" in OSPF: 1. with enviroment NBMA (example Frame) and topology Hub-Spoke then Cost from Hub Router to all Spoke the same (becase the samer1 physical interface ). How to config cost different for each session Hub-Spoke ? 2. if Network type

problem with 7206 router. [7:72177]

2003-07-12 Thread Xy Hien Le
Hi everyone, I bought a 7206 router and it booted up as follow before booting by the Flash Card contains IOS. I think the internal flash device is missing or corrupted. Anyone have any sugestion how I can fix this? Here is the boot up output: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(5) [mkamson 5], RELEAS

RE: IOS AUTH-PROXY problem [7:72005]

2003-07-07 Thread Szabo, Vilmos
Hi, Just run away from 12.1.5T(9). We had some problem with it and discussed in this group with Dmitry and Fabrice. Even if you do not enable http server on the router auth-proxy will be invoked . Regards, Vilmos -Original Message- From: d tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July

tftp problem via checkpoint firewalls [7:71971]

2003-07-07 Thread Gray, Alan
Hi, I have a problem trying to tftp router configs through a cluster-pair of checkpoint-nokia firewalls. I can Telnet from the inside to the router outside the firewall but get a firewall error message when attempt to tftp the config back through the firewall. This all worked fine on Checkpoint

Re: IOS AUTH-PROXY problem [7:71956]

2003-07-06 Thread Joe Deleonardo
x27;t find my notes). I couldn't find the feature anywhere in the documentation for 12.1, but as soon as I looked in 12.2, it was there. Hope that helps. Cheers, Joe - Original Message - From: "d tran" To: ; Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: IOS AUTH-P

IOS AUTH-PROXY problem [7:71952]

2003-07-06 Thread d tran
All, Below is the configuration I have with AUTH-PROXY. I don't understand why the configuration works with IOS version 12.2.15(T) but doesn't work with IOS version 12.1.5T(9). With version 12.1.5T(9), I am not getting a "authentication failed". Instead I am getting "bad request". Any ideas

Re: Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-05 Thread Jens Neelsen
tried what you have suggested and still it doesn't work > The thing is I am convainced that I am missing something but > can't find out > what > Thanx again and any help is appreciated > Elias > > > >From: "Jans van Deventer" > >Reply-To: &qu

Re: Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
ain and any help is appreciated >>Elias >> >> >> >From: "Jans van Deventer" >> >Reply-To: "Jans van Deventer" >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: Re: Problem [7:71890] >> >Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:25:41 GMT >>

Re: Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-04 Thread Zsombor Papp
d what you have suggested and still it doesn't work >The thing is I am convainced that I am missing something but can't find out >what >Thanx again and any help is appreciated >Elias > > > >From: "Jans van Deventer" > >Reply-To: "Jans van Deve

Re: Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-04 Thread Projet AIM
quot; >Reply-To: "Jans van Deventer" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Problem [7:71890] >Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:25:41 GMT > >Hi > >What you did when you typed "no ip routing" was to effectively change >your router into an IP host. You must ena

Re: Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-04 Thread Janó van Deventer
P routing and effectively turning your router into a host is because you can then use all the nice debug functionalities like debug ip packet, as though your router was a host. Regards, Jans Projet AIM wrote: >Hi all >I have a cisco 3600 and I am facing an unknown problem maybe it is stupuid

Problem [7:71890]

2003-07-04 Thread Projet AIM
Hi all I have a cisco 3600 and I am facing an unknown problem maybe it is stupuid but realy i don't know I have a pretty much common configuration 2 valid IP addresses on both interfaces. one of them are my network the other interface is linked to another router interface when I trie to

RE: ????DHCP Problem???? [7:71667]

2003-07-02 Thread Troy Leliard
It also depends on how your ISP is assigning IP addresses My Cable provider only assigned IP's to registered MAC addresses. In this case you can either register you E1 mac address with them, or you can spoof a registered mac address. Below is a snipet of one of my routers spoofing a MAC address

RE: ????DHCP Problem???? [7:71667]

2003-07-01 Thread - jvd
Try interface ethernet 1 ip address negotiated I've seen some configuration like this before and believe it is when the other side is running a DHCP server. Kind regards, Janó Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71732&t=71667

RE: ????DHCP Problem???? [7:71667]

2003-06-30 Thread John Q Public
UPDATE!!! I was able to get an IP on my 806 off my linksys, thru DHCP after I removed the "ip verify unicast reverse-path" command , but still unable to get one from my ISP thru my cable modem, even though I can get one on my linksys and direct to my PC off the same modem, kinda weird, maybe Cisco

RE: ????DHCP Problem???? [7:71667]

2003-06-30 Thread John Q Public
UPDATE!!! I was able to get an IP on my 806 off my linksys, thru DHCP after I removed the "ip verify unicast reverse-path" command , but still unable to get one from my ISP thru my cable modem, even though I can get one on my linksys and direct to my PC off the same modem, kinda weird, maybe Cisco

????DHCP Problem???? [7:71667]

2003-06-30 Thread John Q Public
Linksys, which works ok, my problem is that I can't pull a DHCP IP address from my ISP from my e1 int to save my life, I can get an ip on my linksys off the cable modem and direct into my PC just fine but when I try it on my 806 no matter what I try it just wont take an IP off my cable modem, I kn

RE: IMA problem between Cisco 3600 and Nortel Pass [7:71632]

2003-06-30 Thread Annlee Hines
into the verbiage to get a description. It's highly likely they both result from a single root cause, and looking at the detailed description on both error messages may yield what the PP thinks is the problem. That should then lead you to what needs to change (and that might be on either switch).

IMA problem between Cisco 3600 and Nortel Passport [7:71632]

2003-06-30 Thread Raul Arango
Hi, I am having a stability trouble with an IMA configured over a Cisco 3600 router. The IMA is connected to a Nortel Passport 7480. The IMA has 2 links, and continuously one of the links fails. Here is the IMA configuration: interface ATM1/0 no ip address no ip mroute-cache no atm oversubsc

Re: Boot problem with new 6513 [7:71390]

2003-06-26 Thread MADMAN
I assume you have OS somewhere on this box. If the OS is on bootflash, from the ROMMON prompt try "boot bootflash:filename" You should be able to verify a files existance by doing a "dir bootflash:" Dave Ron wrote: > I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boo

Re: Boot problem with new 6513 [7:71390]

2003-06-25 Thread Ronnie Higginbotham
Ronnie ""Ron"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boot > the device: > > Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty > rommon 1 > > > Can someone lead me in the right direction on what to do to get the boot > string set up pro

RE: Boot problem with new 6513 [7:71390]

2003-06-25 Thread Larry Letterman
Is there a slot card in the sup ? If so , try to boot from slot0: Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boot problem with new 6513 [7

Boot problem with new 6513 [7:71390]

2003-06-25 Thread Ron
I have a new 6513 Catalyst switch and am getting the following when I boot the device: Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty rommon 1 > Can someone lead me in the right direction on what to do to get the boot string set up properly? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?

Switch cluster managment problem. [7:71336]

2003-06-25 Thread Stuart Pittwood
Hi all, We have a 3550-12T which is connected to 3 2950G-48-EI's via the GBIC ports. When I access the cluster managment software on the 3550 is shows the 2950s as unknown devices, if I access the CMS on one of the 2950s it shows me the correct switch (but only the one) and I'm able to manage it.

Re: RES: Problem w/ 802.1q trunking [7:70901]

2003-06-24 Thread CCIEwaNNaB
The native Vlan on the 5500 is Vlan 13. Hemingway: The config I posted was from a 4500M router with a NP-6e module installed. Like I said before I have don't have a problem with 2 of the 3 vlans on the trunk link, but it's Vlan 13 that's the problem. I'm not able to ping fro

Re: RES: Problem w/ 802.1q trunking [7:70901]

2003-06-22 Thread - jvd
This is very interesting. The URL that I posted earlier: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_config uration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca801.html#xtocid18 is for IOS 12.2 Mainline. >From the original message posted you can see that it is really ethernet ports the guy i

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >