ld immediately delete it from
> your computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Wehner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 4:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: wireless security and VPN software? [7:73988]
>
>
ECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wireless security and VPN software? [7:73988]
One more quick note on using VPN solutions. If your using a VPN solution
with a Cisco AP be sure to enable PSPF. Everyone misses that setting...
but it's
One more quick note on using VPN solutions. If your using a VPN solution
with a Cisco AP be sure to enable PSPF. Everyone misses that setting...
but it's important. :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74049&t=73988
--
Well, I thought for sure I was going to fail, but I passed the CSI test with
a score of 902. Needed 825 out of 1000...
After giving it some thought, I think it's probably better if I don't
comment on the wireless questions at this point. I had typed up quite a bit
of observations that I just del
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
> Being in healthcare, I have some strong views on this topic.
> Unfortunately,
> I'm cramming for the CSI test I have tomorrow, and I still have
> two chapters
Good luck on the test.
> to go through on the KnowledgeNet course. So, you will just
> have to wait...
> LOL
.. not a stupid question at all.
The issues we ran into:
1. We put the wireless users on a completely untrusted segment
2. We needed to permit DHCP+DNS to clients pre-VPN connection
DHCP to get an IP, obviously
DNS because our VPN Profiles used DNS
Being in healthcare, I have some strong views on this topic. Unfortunately,
I'm cramming for the CSI test I have tomorrow, and I still have two chapters
to go through on the KnowledgeNet course. So, you will just have to wait...
LOL Expect some comments on EAP-TLS, WPA, and assorted technologie
What type of applications do they need to support?
What devices and OS's do they need to support?
-Watch out for PDAs. Most PDAs have limited support for VPN clients.
What type of users are they? (Techie or basic AOL users?)
These are the main questions in my opinion. VPNs aren't so bad. I
I did some nice jobs with 350 (not eol?) AP and WB (max 8 mac-addresses)
with external directional antennas, AIR-ANT1949 is good.
Maybe you'l need 2 real bridges because of the 8mac-address limit. 4 pc's
laptops, jetdirect etc...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/752/qrg/cpqrg_ch3_wirelesslan.sh
Are they concerned about what is in the traffic going back and forth
from the wireless users to the wired network? In other words
interception of the signal. Or is it a desire to isolate the wireless
from the wired side of the network. If isolation is what is needed, it
would seem a lot easier to p
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> For a large campus network that has a need for wireless access in
conference
> rooms, cafeterias, etc., would it be overkill to require wireless clients
to
> use VPN IPSec software to access the campus network? This is for a customer
> who is paranoid about security a
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Weaselboy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
> bosons. Between t
Hi,
I used Cisco's Parter E-Learning Connection.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/pec/peclogin.html
You need a valid CCO login account. Most of the training is free with a
couple of hands-on LABS (350 Series). I had to fork out about $395-00 for
the Advanced Wireless On-line VOD co
003 12:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I needed to pad out my resume with a few good certs before I renew my
> CCNP and start the CCIE track. Wireless is a hot topic, and these were
> two pretty easy one-test resume fillers (and kinda fun
Is Fiber considered wireless?
-Original Message-
From: Weaselboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
I needed to pad out my resume with a few good certs before I renew my
CCNP and start the CCIE track
I needed to pad out my resume with a few good certs before I renew my
CCNP and start the CCIE track. Wireless is a hot topic, and these were
two pretty easy one-test resume fillers (and kinda fun to play with).
SE = (wireless) System Engineer
FE = (wireless) Field Engineer
Here are links to th
Hi,
I used Cisco's Parter E-Learning Connection.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/pec/peclogin.html
You need a valid CCO login account. Most of the training is free with a
couple of hands-on LABS (350 Series). I had to fork out about $395-00 for
the Advanced Wireless On-line VOD co
Definitely agree...I used Building a Cisco Wireless LAN, CWNA, plus, luckily
I had an 1100 to play with. Know the basics, but also know the products
(AP's and the interface, antennas, and client cards)
HTH
Duncan Wallace
Sr. Systems Engineer
Pacific Star Communications
15714 SW 72nd Ave.
Portland
iginal Message-
> From: Weaselboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: Catherine Wu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I had a little bit of practical experience with other manufacture's
> equipme
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Weaselboy
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: wireless [7:71781]
>
>
> I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
> bosons. Between t
I passed both the SE and FE exams first time out using the CWNA book and
bosons. Between these two sources you should have everything you need.
Take the SE first (its a little easier).
The WB
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 09:23, Vijay Anand wrote:
> hello all
>
> i want to know ,,how is Cisco wirele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about layer 3 segmentation? You do not want to shoot broadcasts trough
all your repaters.
The problem is, using repeaters wil give you a hub-like environment. When
using bridges full frames are sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about layer 3 segmentation? You do not want to shoot broadcasts trough
all your repaters.
The problem is, using repeaters wil give you a hub-like environment. When
using bridges full frames are stored and forwarded.
Martijn
- -Oorspronkeli
I passed both the Wireless SE and FE exams using the CWNA book and the
bosons. The two exams have about 70% overlap, I'd go ahead and take them
both to double certify. Since the SE is easier, I'd do that one first.
Just my $.02
The WB
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 11:03, Joao Medeiros wrote:
> with cc
with cco in cisco website (partner learning connection) have one lab to this
test.
Best Regards
Joao Medeiros
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71159&t=71011
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
I got it working.
Linksys gives you the option to make the AP behave as an AP,Client,Bridge or
Multipoint bridge.I made the remote AP a client and it came right up.
Thanks for the help
Don K.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70773&t=70674
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The Road Goes Ever On wrote:
> >
snip a few things for brevety
> > >
> > > If I have both APs act as bridges to link the larger office
> > will the small
> > > single pc office still be able to connect or would that
> > require
Good article reference. It's the same old story -- the network, like every
other business asset, exists to serve a business purpose, expected to
generate added value greater than cost. Otherwise, it won't be put in.
Actually delivering on the added value is another question, of course, but
from wha
Good article. I'm always amazed at how many times I see a network that
doesn't work well, but is too expensive to fix. The problem falls to whoever
designed it not understanding that it had to serve the business, not the
technology.
All business assets, including the network, are there to add valu
The Road Goes Ever On wrote:
>
> sorry for the sarcasm, but it's late and I really should be
> doing more
> important things like sleeping.
>
>
> ""Don Kanicki"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Thanks for the responces.
> >
> > All of our machines are used for email\web wi
Thanks everyone.
Very much apreciated.
Don K.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70719&t=70674
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclos
sorry for the sarcasm, but it's late and I really should be doing more
important things like sleeping.
""Don Kanicki"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks for the responces.
>
> All of our machines are used for email\web with the exception of the
> accounting pc which is not
Thanks for the responces.
All of our machines are used for email\web with the exception of the
accounting pc which is not on the network.Im going to look into some kind of
software firewall for our network and I can only assume the other offices
will do the same.
All offices are on the same floor
some things to consider. I admire your boss' generosity but let strangers
onto your network like this? well - maybe you got nothing worth protecting
anyway;->
more thoughts in line below:
""Don Kanicki"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello all.
> Our office has a T1 connection to
, June 15, 2003 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless problem [7:70674]
I'm not quite sure what your final network looks like.
Are you saying that you have:
switch AP - AP - 4 PCs??
I'm not sure that the Linksys can do an AP - AP connection.
On the page for
I'm not quite sure what your final network looks like.
Are you saying that you have:
switch AP - AP - 4 PCs??
I'm not sure that the Linksys can do an AP - AP connection.
On the page for BEFW11S4, which is a Wireless Access Point router, you can
click on "Where it fits into my net
Sorry forgot to mention some info that may be relevant.
The office with 4 devices has their access point patched through into a hub
that all 4 devices also connect to.
Both access points are set to act as access points.
The office with one PC will also need to connect to my AP but will do so
wit
By kit I mean questions about the Cisco devices (1200 / 350 / Bridges etc),
and their abilities, specs etc. I had no questions on the CLI at all..
""1 cisco"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Do you mean cisco interface when talking about the KIT?
> Any questions on the cli?
Mess
Do you mean cisco interface when talking about the KIT?
Any questions on the cli?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69883&t=69842
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
I took and passed this test last week. Got an 87 which I was happy with. I
took the CWNA exam by planet 3 the week before the Cisco and found that this
was nearly sufficient for me to pass. What I am getting at is that I got
between 5 and 10 questions on Cisco kit and the rest on WLAN theory. All m
S! ALL!
Here's my experience with trying to pass VLANS over Aeronet 350
bridges...this ties into this thread because we ran into issues when we
tried to link bridges...
glossary: trunk = "switchport mode trunk" with ALL VLANS allowed. 802.1q
encapsulation.
I run a single DS1 into an office park.
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > > You are not supposed to use more than 3 repeaters...
> >
> > Now here is a question. Why couldn't you use actual wireless
> > bridge
> > units?
>
> Then you would be limited by the rule that you shouldn't have more than 7
> bridges.
Ok, tha
Andrew Dorsett wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dave wrote:
>
> > You are not supposed to use more than 3 repeaters...
>
> Now here is a question. Why couldn't you use actual wireless
> bridge
> units?
Then you would be limited by the rule that you shouldn't have more than 7
bridges.
> As lo
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dave wrote:
> You are not supposed to use more than 3 repeaters...
Now here is a question. Why couldn't you use actual wireless bridge
units? As long as you have addressing schemes and the TTL on the packets
is high enough, you should be able to bounce it down the line with
You are not supposed to use more than 3 repeaters...
d-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Williamson, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wireless AP Chaining [7:66270]
Anyone know the maximum number
Duncan, I'm not sure if you're talking about the new exam or the old one
that you could take in the privacy of your office (aka open book test). I
haven't taken the new exam yet, but will in about 30-45 days. I'm sure it's
going to be more difficult than the old test and hopefully updated. The old
m: JJ Angleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:28 AM
To: Duncan Wallace; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless LAN Support Exam [7:65625]
I passed both cisco wireless exams in the last few month. I've got some
practical experiance with the equipment, so I read ev
Jeffrey Reed
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Wireless LAN Support Exam [7:65625]
Duncan, I'm not sure if you're talking about the new exam or the old one
that you could take in the privacy of your office (aka open book test).
I
haven't taken t
I took the Wireless LAN Support exam a month ago. The exam is absolutely a
joke. The exam concentrates very little on LEAP, EAP-TLS, PEAP and EAP-TTLS.
I was very disappointed the way the exam is written. I could be wrong on
this one
but if you ask someone who already passed the Wireless support
I passed both cisco wireless exams in the last few month. I've got some
practical experiance with the equipment, so I read everything I could find
on the CCO and downloaded the bosons, which turned out to be great.
Make sure to take design first, and support second.
Duncan Wallace wrote:I was
I passed both cisco wireless exams in the last few month. I've got some
practical experiance with the equipment, so I read everything I could find
on the CCO and downloaded the bosons, which turned out to be great.
Make sure to take design first, and support second.
Duncan Wallace wrote:I was
Duncan, I'm not sure if you're talking about the new exam or the old one
that you could take in the privacy of your office (aka open book test). I
haven't taken the new exam yet, but will in about 30-45 days. I'm sure it's
going to be more difficult than the old test and hopefully updated. The old
check out AiroPeek QuickStart e-seminar by Wildpackets or just download the
demo and try it out, it might be what you want
www.wildpackets.com (but site appears to be having problems today)
""Greg Rend"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anyone recommend software/hardware for montioring,
I just implemented a 1200 solution...I don't have access to the rack,
but maybe I could help with any questions you have.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Juan Blanco
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: W
Try http://www.80211planet.com/
Good tutorials and a great starting point.
/JS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62232&t=62104
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
John,
It's a little dated, but alot of folks like 802.11 Wireless Networks: The
Definitive Guide (O'Reilly Networking) (Matthew S. Gast). I have that book
and it provides some very good detail on A and B, but little on G which just
emerging as the book went to press.
The below is an excellent s
""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We cannot afford that equipment right now. Also ran the diagnostic test to
> find the clear channel, we found the channel but bridges didn't work.
CL: can you afford to have your network down? for how long? forever
We cannot afford that equipment right now. Also ran the diagnostic test to
find the clear channel, we found the channel but bridges didn't work.
Best regards,
""Tunde Kalejaiye"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> try using a spectrum analyser to determine if there
try using a spectrum analyser to determine if there is a strong RF
interference from somewhere close bythis is probably ur best bet.
Tunde
- Original Message -
From: "Cisco Breaker"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:04 AM
Subject: Wireless 350 bridge problem [7:57827]
> Hi
It'll work however:
1)You're not offering much security unless the conduits are for
protocol/applications of a completely benign nature, which I'm confident the
probably are not.
2)By doing this the data traveling between wireless clients and these
opened(conduit) services are at risk of being cap
A great source for information is the e-learning stuff on PEC. Also lots of
info on CCO, and there is always the training class from Giga Wave.
tm
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Anil Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I just took this test on the last day before it became a sylvan
prometric exam, I actually took it online. I was told by Cisco there is
not yet a book for this course, but there was a online course you can
take. I took that course and I felt like the cousre was kind of weak,
well guess what I bare
Your DHCP servers should be looking at the "giaddr" field in the
DHCP packet being relayed by your router. It's this field that
the DHCP server uses to determine which scopes are applicable.
I looked into this before and I believe cisco has changed the default
value it uses for the intserted gia
"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Wireless Field Engineer exam [7:51549]
> Nevermind, just found it. For those interested:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/partner_programs/specialization/wlan_up
> date.shtml
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
>
score and unlimitted answering time. I have heard that
> now
> > the answer time is limited.
> > Regards,
> > Fathalla
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jay Dunn
> > Sent: Saturday, Augu
unlimitted answering time. I have heard that
now
> the answer time is limited.
> Regards,
> Fathalla
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jay Dunn
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PR
Dunn
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Wireless Field Engineer exam [7:51549]
This exam is currently given over the web at a cost of $35. It is due to
change to a proctored exam given at Prometric or VUE in less than 2
weeks. My advice is to try and take it
This exam is currently given over the web at a cost of $35. It is due to
change to a proctored exam given at Prometric or VUE in less than 2
weeks. My advice is to try and take it on the web ASAP. There are
approx. 78 questions. The video on demand covers just about everything
you need to know. Ma
Scott wrote:
>
> Anybody know a good source to learn about wireless? From
> basics of the
> technology all the way to advanced possibly w/Cisco product
> lines.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>
My new book, Troubleshooting Campus Networks, has a 50-page chapter on
wireless. It was written by my co
Theo
"Ken Diliberto"
06/28/2002 12:45 AM
To: ,
cc:
Subject: Re: Wireless Training [7:47535]
Theo,
Figure out what it is you want from training then go looking. Do you
want to learn how to configure a card and AP? Bridges? Doing site
surveys?
Theo,
Figure out what it is you want from training then go looking. Do you
want to learn how to configure a card and AP? Bridges? Doing site
surveys? There's tons of stuff.
Ken
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
06/26/02 08:43PM >>>
Group-
Besides Cisco wireless related training, could anyone give me
The only thing I can think of is the terrible WT2700 (5.8ghz) product that
was very short lived. However Cisco will still be releasing IOS to support
these routers which included the 2600,3600 and 7246UBR's...
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46202&t=46079
You can take an on-line course on the Partner E-Learning Website.
You can also get the course on CD. (for free)
I used just these materials to pass the test last year and again to
recertify this year.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Elijah Savage"
To:
Sent: Saturday, 08 June
I passed the SE test by attending a Gigawave (www.giga-wave.com) classroom
training session. They do all the technical training for Cisco's wireless
solutions. The book you get in class has all the answers for the test. A
little hands-on knowledge makes it all very easy. I'm sure if you looked
thr
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roberts, Larry
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Wireless LAN for Home [7:44234]
I use the BEFW11S4 and the Orinoco silver/gold cards. I have a couple of the
aironet cards on order for testing, but I can say that the
Cisco.
""Alex Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any recommendation on PCI type cards ?
>
>
> ""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I use the BEFW11S4 and the Orinoco silver/gold cards. I have a couple of
> the
Any recommendation on PCI type cards ?
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I use the BEFW11S4 and the Orinoco silver/gold cards. I have a couple of
the
> aironet cards on order for testing, but I can say that the WPC11 (
linksys )
> Card is somethi
ginal Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless LAN for Home [7:44234]
That's OK. I bought an HP wireless AP/router/FW and that was OK as well.
I have heard the linksys card is pretty weak, and
That's OK. I bought an HP wireless AP/router/FW and that was OK as well.
I have heard the linksys card is pretty weak, and if you can get a Cisco
aironet card, even better.
""Bolton, Travis D"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys,
>
> Any suggestions/experienc
What is CWNA? I am unaware of such a title.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
kvgb
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wireless certification [7:40071]
Ashish,
I am interested in CWNA, what study
Ashish,
I am interested in CWNA, what study materials did you use?
Thanks,
kvgb
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40143&t=40071
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm
Tim
Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Joseph Rago
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: wireless cert [7:37574]
Has any one
Has any one taken the cisco wireless cert exam. If yes, what study material
did you
use. Is there anything besides the presentation on Cisco's CCO.
Thanks Joe R.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37574&t=37574
-
t3 microwave stuff might be in order. You need Line of Sight though.
""Sites, Bob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Has anyone setup or can you point me to a wireless solution for an entire
> metro area? I have a hospital that we would like to link 10+ offices
wit
you might need to use licensed spectrum for this kind of an application.
consider that with unlicensed, anyone can use it, and you run the risk of
interfering with someone else's stuff, and you run the risk of them
interfering with your stuff. not to mention the security considerations.
Call the
Didn't someone in Colorado acquire the remnants of Ricochet, that sounds
like what you need, if you want range beyond that of a building.
Bri
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jason wrote:
> Is this legal ? I would think that you could run into legal issues as
2.4Gig
> is also used by lots of other
Is this legal ? I would think that you could run into legal issues as 2.4Gig
is also used by lots of other devices and there is potential problem with
increase the power to deal with such a requirement.
""Sites, Bob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Has anyone set
I am working with Dell TrueMobile AP1100s, Dell TrueMobile 4800s and Cisco
AP350s right now. I have my access points configured with hard coded IP
addresses. The wireless users have their NICs configured for addressing
via DHCP. So they get DNS, WINS and the like via their DHCP request when
the
Have you tied the TCP/IP stack to the Wireless PCCard??
1. Check the local loop-back address: ping 127.0.0.1 if this doesn't work
then check if there is a IRQ conflict with the PC-Card drivers/hardware
2. Check the IP node address: ping x.x.x.x (where x.x.x.x is the IP address
of your node)
3
On May 30, 7:10am, "Hire, Ejay" wrote:
}
} Back to the off topic subject of Liquid cooled CPU's, most desings I've
seen
} use mineral oil. A fault with this design is that "bubbles" of moisture
can
} settle out and sink onto the Board/cpu.
The other thing I was wondering is wouldn't the mi
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless max distanc
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless max distanc
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless max distanc
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless max distanc
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless max distanc
Flourinert - (Pronounced Floor-in-ert) is pretty neat stuff. You can put
your tv in a tank of the stuff and keep on watching. also, if you've got a
intermittent solder joint, plug it in and dunk it in florinert. You'll see
a thin stream of bubbles rising from the fault. First time I saw it was
My first job in networking, or should I say connecting Sun 350's to
thicknet ethernet vampire taps until they let me get my newbie hands on
those brand new Cisco thingies, was at Cray Research. The Cray2 circuit
boards were immersed in florinert (sp?) to keep them cool. Ran about
$400 a gallon a
For those interested, I found that old link about the guy who submerged his
motherboard in -40 degree mineral oil ;)
http://www.drffreeze.com/Test2.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: wireless ma
I was wondering if someone would respond that way! ;-) We did this a while
ago before corporate Starbucks decided to roll out their "approved" method.
I think it was over a year ago that we put it in.
We use the Apple Airport. We didn't use any antennae beyond the antenna
inside the Airport. W
really? we did a roll out to starbucks nationwide through mobilestar using
ap340's and some nokia and 2621 routers. We never saw these issues. Was
this a private contract you did with them? And where did you place the
antenneas?
Patrick Ramsey
Sr. Network Engineer
WellStar Health Systems
77
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
