Sure
You will need to be running IOS 12.2(8)T or above.
""bk"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to terminate a vpn tunnel on a 3640 for clients (4.x). I
> have done it on a pix with split-tunnel. Can the 3640 be setup to
&g
Hello all,
I am trying to terminate a vpn tunnel on a 3640 for clients (4.x). I
have done it on a pix with split-tunnel. Can the 3640 be setup to
perform split-tunnel?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75134&
You're getting a race condition because you're injecting the tunnel's ip
address into your control plane routing. Your tunnel protocol is using your
routing to transfer payload from one end to another. However when you use
the ip address of the tunnel and injecting it into your r
I would think security point of view...there would be better
solutions...however...this is just a lab scenario. Thanks so much for your
help though. I see the problem now and changed the static route to point to
tunnel destination.
Thanks!
Dain
""Zsombor Papp"" wrote in
On r2 use a Loopback interface to terminate the tunnel
Aurelian Georgescu
-Original Message-
From: Dain Deutschman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 12:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GRE Tunnel Recursive Routing Error [7:74035]
Hi all,
I'm gett
r1 (bb2) learns the route to the destination of the GRE tunnel, 150.50.22.2,
via that same GRE tunnel. Add a static route like this to r1's configuration:
ip route 150.50.22.2 255.255.255.255 Ethernet0
As a side note, is this (GRE tunnel through the PIX) a good design from the
security poi
Hi all,
I'm getting a "recursive routing" error when trying to tunnel with gre.
r1-pix-r2
The error follows along with my configs and route tables.
Thanks!
00:52:21: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Tunnel0, changed
state
to down
bb2#
00:53:21: %LIN
x27;t have that
route any longer.
Okay, to the main topic - I run 12.3.1 on a 7206VXR and I could
configure bridge-group on the tunnel interface.
interface Tunnel10
bandwidth 1500
ip unnumbered Loopback1
ip mtu 1440
ip hello-interval eigrp 2002 10
ip hold-time eigrp 2002 40
keepalive 10 4
t
r rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:50 AM
> To: 'Reimer, Fred'
> Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72
When I first triggered this question, certainly I took advantage of having a
forum full of creative techie people. Why would I need to bridge 2 LANs,
separated from a couple of routers or so, using a tunnel? Well, that
question, indeed, came from one of our customers, and then my coming to
think
If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:50 AM
To: 'Reimer,
x27;t have that
route any longer.
Okay, to the main topic - I run 12.3.1 on a 7206VXR and I could
configure bridge-group on the tunnel interface.
interface Tunnel10
bandwidth 1500
ip unnumbered Loopback1
ip mtu 1440
ip hello-interval eigrp 2002 10
ip hold-time eigrp 2002 40
keepalive 10 4
t
Ah O.K. My apologies then. It slipped my mind that there is a separate
group for the CCIE lab and that this was more of a general group. Sorry for
the inappropriate post.
The question is still out there though, although it may me possible to
configure a bridge-group on a tunnel interface in
y, July 23, 2003 8:50 AM
To: 'Reimer, Fred'
Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72738]
Hello,
I was just trying to suggest maybe put the command bridge-group there to
see if 12.2.15T5 takes it or not - whether that will work...etc, is a
different story - just for informat
Hello,
Didn't mean anything - just some information in case you guys not just
study but doing work for your company also. And like John said, I was
curious to see if you could do broadcast over the tunnel since when talk
about GRE, mostly it could implement multicast and not a mention of
broa
ed at the moment to try it out, though.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Reimer, Fred"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:29 PM
Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72738]
> 12.2(15)T5 is a recommended version for the IP v4 exploit, as far as I
know,
> see
sclose, distribute, copy,
print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Reimer, Fred
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:30 PM
> To: Luan Nguyen; 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:
003 11:30 PM
To: Luan Nguyen; 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72738]
12.2(15)T5 is a recommended version for the IP v4 exploit, as far as I know,
see (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml).
Are you
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:02 PM
To: 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: GRE TUNNEL/Ethernet-broadcast-like? [7:72738]
Uhm,
Why don't you just put the command there and see what's going on. I
don't mess with 12.2.15Tx any more since
x27;t have that
route any longer.
Okay, to the main topic - I run 12.3.1 on a 7206VXR and I could
configure bridge-group on the tunnel interface.
interface Tunnel10
bandwidth 1500
ip unnumbered Loopback1
ip mtu 1440
ip hello-interval eigrp 2002 10
ip hold-time eigrp 2002 40
keepalive 10 4
t
Wow, I hope you don't try that on your CCIE lab! Last I heard, bridging was
not supported on tunnel interfaces. At least it's not on the 12.2(15)T5
running on a 2651XM router I just tested. If you find a (recent, supported)
version of IOS that supports "bridge-group" i
The client may not have control over the cloud in the center, and the cloud
may only support TCP/IP. The only solution would be to properly route the
supported protocol in the tunnel interface (Tunnel interfaces support
AppleTalk, Banyan VINES, CLNS, DECnet, IP, or IPX), or use DLSW if SNA
and/or
Uhm. Never done this or heard of this before. I would just do
something like:
Interface LAN 1
Bridge-group 1
Interface tunnel 1
Source WAN
Destination REMOTE_WAN
Bridge-group 1
Since, concurrent routing and bridging makes it possible to both route
and bridge a specific protocol on separate
idging? That would be easier. :-)
>
> Since I haven't done it before, I kind of thought that it'll be
> possible. For instance, having:
>
> R1eth0(no ip address)--GRE
> TUNNEL-Ser0--CLOUD--GRE_TUNN--Ser1---R2eth0(no ip address)
> , where arp packets may flow from R1 t
haven't done it before, I kind of thought that it'll be possible.
>For instance, having:
>
>R1eth0(no ip address)--GRE TUNNEL-Ser0--CLOUD--GRE_TUNN--Ser1---R2eth0(no
ip
>address)
> , where arp packets may flow from R1 to R2 via this GRE Tunnel.
>
>Under this scenari
aving:
R1eth0(no ip address)--GRE TUNNEL-Ser0--CLOUD--GRE_TUNN--Ser1---R2eth0(no ip
address)
, where arp packets may flow from R1 to R2 via this GRE Tunnel.
Under this scenario and simply put, can R1'sLAN be also part of R2'sLAN? If
it's possible, how could the config be like?
Best
I am planning on using a GRE tunnel across a MPLS VPN in order to create an
EIGRP neighbour relationship across the cloud. The VPN link will be running
at 8Mbps. The routers terminating the tunnel will be a 3640 and RSM. Does
anyone know if this will adversely impact the processors and/or
sorry i asked wrong quastion, what is advantages of tunnel than
virtual-links in ospf.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71229&t=71119
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groups
i actually have not tried this, but, if u configure a tunnel, u don't need a
virtual link, since ur tunnel will up to the backbone, in which case direct
adjencency of the areas, but since i have not tried this, i don't know if it
works.
""Nikolay Abromov"" a icrit d
i've very simple quastion, it's there any advantages to useing tunnel than
virtual-links in ospf network expect that tunnel can use trought stub areas?
thanks in advance.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
Try this URL
pad
pad
pad
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk369/tech_protocol_family_home.html
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the
> folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel
I will post the config, as soon as I am able, but I have a route on both
sides, and can ping,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70621&t=70590
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
You should have a route between the source and the destination of the
tunnel. You must be able to ping them before you can set up the tunnel.
Aurelian Georgescu
-Original Message-
From: Skarphedinsson Arni V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL
If you could post your configuration, it would be a lot easier for us to
help you troubleshoot the problem.
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the
> folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel
Hi all
I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the
folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel
Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized
and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
All,
I'd try this myself if I had a router at my fingertips...
1. I'd like to apply LLQ for my VoIP traffic over a site to site VPN using
Cisco's Modular QoS technique. Will the router "bark" if I try to apply my
output service policy to the tunnel interface? Or do
""Ben W"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The problem with doing standby track tunnel is quite often, the tunnel
> interface doesn't go down. I had the same question awhile back when I was
> configuring HSRP and i found out that the tunnel interface
The problem with doing standby track tunnel is quite often, the tunnel
interface doesn't go down. I had the same question awhile back when I was
configuring HSRP and i found out that the tunnel interfaces would stay up,
up, even though traffic stopped routing through it for one reason or
an
Anyone configured NAT under tunnel interface (GRE tunnel)??
Also anyone knows if i can use standby track tunnel (HSRP track interface
command)??
Thanks,
Karim.
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http
dialup software will insert a
classful route for the prefix of the newly installed dialup interface. So
for your example lets say your PPTP tunnel is addressed with 192.168.1.100,
then the MS dialup software has frequently installed a 192.168.0.0/16 route.
If you are lucky enough to have your inte
1. So this feed needs to go over internet. If I put
a
> 2500 router on each network, could I create a GRE tunnel and forward the
UDP
> broadcasts from Network A to network B? Lets assume the application takes
> care of the reliability problem posed by UDP.
>
>
>
> /---
In the following secnaryo should there be any problems for the hosts on the
inside of router1 to connect to the hosts on the otherside of the VPN tunnel
inside networkrouter1router2internet
inside of router1 are RFC1918 addresses are used
router1 is doing NAT
in between the router is
ients on network B that need to get these broadcasts. I can't afford a
dedicated link like a t1. So this feed needs to go over internet. If I put a
2500 router on each network, could I create a GRE tunnel and forward the UDP
broadcasts from Network A to network B? Lets assume the application tak
ients on network B that need to get these broadcasts. I can't afford a
dedicated link like a t1. So this feed needs to go over internet. If I put a
2500 router on each network, could I create a GRE tunnel and forward the UDP
broadcasts from Network A to network B? Lets assume the application tak
I there a way to do split-tunneling for vpn clients connecting to a pix with
pptp so that they don´t lose internet conectivity, the clients are using the
microsoft vpn dialar.
any examples of this would be great.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64585&t=64585
P,IPXWAN,IPX Addressing, GNS)
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> The Long and Winding Road
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:14 PM
>
Long and Winding Road
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GRE Tunnel [7:62235]
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Bruno Fernandes"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTE
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Bruno Fernandes"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi again,
>
> I already tried to give the command in the tunnel interface but the
> bridge-group com
Hi again,
I already tried to give the command in the tunnel interface but the
bridge-group command simply isn't there, I am doing this in 2600 router,
with an enterprise image.
Any comments
Thanks in advance,
Bruno Fernandes
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote
in m
bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Namens Leo Song
Verzonden: maandag 3 februari 2003 21:33
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Cisco IPSec Tunnel Lifetime [7:62374]
Hi,
Is it possible to configure the IPSec tunnel never expired on Cisco PIX? A
little bit weird, and we got
Hi,
Is it possible to configure the IPSec tunnel never expired on Cisco PIX?
A little bit weird, and we got such interesting request. Thanks.
Leo
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62374&t=62374
--
F
It's exactly as I have in my email earlier.
The only thing that I changed was:
#remove access-list 102 -not needed as ospf and other ip traffic is
inside the tunnel
#change access-list 199 referenced in the cryptomap:
RTA# serial ip = 120.20.26.2 255.255.255.0 tunnel ip = 120.20
""Bruno Fernandes"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Good morning !!!
>
> Is it possible to a Tunnel Interface to belong to a Bridge-Group ?
yes
> If yes, how ?
same as with any other interface - enter the appropriate br
YES
It finally worked!!
I had to permit the tunnel ip of the other side(A) to the serial ip on
this side(B) for gre and vice versa on the other side.
Thank you very much for your help.
This gives me great confidence to surge forward regarding tackling route
0.59.0 255.255.255.0 yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
255.255.255.0,
where yyy is the address of the remote tunnel.
This way you are telling the router to IPSEC the gre traffic sourced by the
tunnel, destinated to the remote tunnel. The OSPF traffic will be inside
the tunnel, so IPSEC will
Good morning !!!
Is it possible to a Tunnel Interface to belong to a Bridge-Group ?
If yes, how ?
Regards,
Bruno
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62235&t=62235
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
th my education."
"Thomas
N."
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
cc:
nobody@groupstudySubject: MTU size for
IPSec+GRE tunnel [7:621
Hello Claudio,
No luck.I denied the tunnel intf. itself in the access-list and still
same problem. The ospf neighbor relation goes down...
R6-C#sh access-lists 199
Extended IP access list 199
deny ip 120.20.59.0 0.0.0.255 120.20.59.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 120.20.0.0 0.0.255.55
Hi All,
I am trying to avoid fragmentation of packets across the IPSec+GRE tunnel
with "transform-set" using "ah-sha-hmac" AND "esp-3des" for header
authentication and payload encryption. What size of MTU or "TCP
addjust-MSS" should I use for maximum per
multicast traffic cannot be "normally" be encrypted, that is
the reason to use a GRE tunnel and then encrypt GRE traffic
Cheers,
Jose
""Claudio Spescha"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello
>
> You should not encry
Hello
You should not encrypt the tunnel network itself.
First line of access-list 199 should be: access-list 199 deny ip 120.20.59.0
0.0.0.255 120.20.59.0 0.0.0.255
The router can not build an OSPF adjacency on encrypted traffic.
see you
Claudio
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
The 2600 and the 3600 are fine.
But you would need the Enterprise Feature Set
>From: "Marcel Janssen" >Reply-To: "Marcel Janssen" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: IPSec tunnel [7:62125] >Date: Wed, 29 Jan
2003 19:23:45 GMT > >Hi, > >we are plann
Hi,
we are planning to use Cisco routers between our main
site and two remote sites with an IPSec tunnel using
3DES encryption and certificates for authentication.
Can someone tell me what Cisco hw platform and IOS sw
I need with 2 IPSec tunnels ending in one router
Hello,I have 2 routers, R2R6 connected via serial netw.
120.20.26.0/24Ospf Area 0 is on R2, netw. 120.20.234.0/27Isis on lo0 on
R2 (2.2.2.2/24) and on the serials between the 2 routersOspf Area 3 on
R6, netws. 120.20.60.0/24 and lo0, 6.6.6.6/24 Created a tunnel on R2 and
R6 to connect area 3 to
If you have version 6.2 you can use the "nat outside" command. This command
does exactly what you are asking. It allows for networks that have the same
addressing scheme to connect to each other without having to do any
re-addressing. I have included some links from CCO. If you do not have an
Hello everybody,
My question is: Can I terminate IPSec VPN tunnel on PIX and translate my
addresses to net on second end of tunnel together?
I have got two networks with IP address schema 10.x.x.x and I have to link
them via Internet. An access firewall is PIX on first and second net. I
don&#
Hello,
I'm have 2 Cisco 2501, and I need configure them as Frame-Relay
Switching, but this model has only 2 Serial interfaces, so I get some
configuration examples that explain how configure Frame-Relay switching
on a Tunnel using the Ethernet Interface, but some commands of this
configur
""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> anyone know if there is a way to "tunnel" single,
> remote users over an IPX network?
>
> i have a manager who moves to different remote sites,
> but doesn't
anyone know if there is a way to "tunnel" single,
remote users over an IPX network?
i have a manager who moves to different remote sites,
but doesn't want to change his IPX network address.
is there a VPN (GRE) client or something of the sort
that will allow for this? i'm
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Karaoghlanian, Hagop
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hub-Spoke VPN tunnel problem [7:58114]
Hello gentelmen,
Heres my problem.
I have
-
Hub |
|
Hello gentelmen,
Heres my problem.
I have
-
Hub |
| spoke |
|--
||LAN address 192.100.70.1
LAN addr
Yes it is possible, I used this architecture at home with OSPF on the GRE
tunnel and it works fine !
""supernet"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> RouterA---Internet--PIX-RouterB. I want to establish VPN
> between RouterA and PIX and
RouterA---Internet--PIX-RouterB. I want to establish VPN
between RouterA and PIX and build a GRE tunnel between RouterA and
RouterB. The reason is I need to run routing protocol between RouterA
and RouterB. Is it possible? Many thanks.
Message Posted at:
http
gt;
> Favor responder a "Richard Deal"
>
> Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
>
> Assunto:Re: VPN tunnel with IPSec over GRE [7:54634]
>
>
> It's probably an MTU problem.
>
> I have an IPSec connection bein
firmation! I used extended ping with DF bit
set
> as
> > Richarde mentioned and found out that the packet size that can fit into
> the
> > tunnel without fragmentation is much less than 1500 bytes. I also went
> over
> > couple white papers from Cisco website. They mentio
quot; wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thank you All for the confirmation! I used extended ping with DF bit set
as
> Richarde mentioned and found out that the packet size that can fit into
the
> tunnel without fragmentation is much less than 1500 byte
Cisco Systems
De Kleetlaan 6b - Pegasus Park
B-1831 Diegem (Belgium)
-Original Message-
From: Thomas N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 2 oktober 2002 3:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VPN tunnel with IPSec over GRE [7:54634]
Thank you
Thank you All for the confirmation! I used extended ping with DF bit set as
Richarde mentioned and found out that the packet size that can fit into the
tunnel without fragmentation is much less than 1500 bytes. I also went over
couple white papers from Cisco website. They mentions about using
I too have seen these issues with VPN before, but unfortunately changing the
MTU did not help for me.
Robert Raver wrote:
>
> Everybody,
>
> I would have to agree with Chuck. I work on TAC for there VPN
> support and
> deal with these issues everyday. If the tunnel est
Everybody,
I would have to agree with Chuck. I work on TAC for there VPN support and
deal with these issues everyday. If the tunnel establishes and the traffic
does not pass then look at the MTU. MTU can cause a lot of problems
Thanks,
Robert Raver
Cisco Systems Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
VPN. We tunneled IPX through a GRE
tunnel with IPSEC 3DES. Connectivity was fine. I saw all routes. We could
ping the routers throughout the network ( IP was enabled on all routers for
remote management ) I saw all IP routes and all IPX routes. IPX pings and IP
pings router to router worked fine
Assunto:Re: VPN tunnel with IPSec over GRE [7:54634]
It's probably an MTU problem.
I have an IPSec connection being tunneled via GRE, which in turn, is
tunneled by another IPSec connection. Don't ask why I'm doing this :-) But
we had to set the MTU down to 1320 to prevent fragment
tting up a site-to-site VPN between 2 LANs using Cisco IOS VPN
(Cisco
> 2600 routers). I could get the tunnel up and running between the two LANs
> with IPSec over GRE so that I can run EIGRP. Data transfer between 2 LANs
> across the tunnel looks OK, and all dynamic routes learned with EIG
Hi All,
I am setting up a site-to-site VPN between 2 LANs using Cisco IOS VPN (Cisco
2600 routers). I could get the tunnel up and running between the two LANs
with IPSec over GRE so that I can run EIGRP. Data transfer between 2 LANs
across the tunnel looks OK, and all dynamic routes learned
;"Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear ALL,
>
> I was looking for help on cisco router using the "?" command, i found a
> command called "tunnel", anybody explain the using of that comma
Dear ALL,
I was looking for help on cisco router using the "?" command, i found a
command called "tunnel", anybody explain the using of that command by an
examples.
Regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
What exactly do you mean by "non-Cisco VPN"? It's not like Cisco owns the
spec's to IPSEC either.
""Sites, Bob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone relate any pro/con's of creating a PPTP VPN Tu
Can anyone relate any pro/con's of creating a PPTP VPN Tunnel through a Pix
515? I asked the TAC about this and below are the 3 commands they say I
need. It would be point-to-point via IP address from inside to a location on
the internet. I'm a little leary of using a Non-Cisco VPN
Hi,
Try to use GRE tunnel, there is an example of our LAB which transports
IPX over IP tunnel:
IP TUNNEL LAB
=
OSPF AREA 0
ISP_A 10.0.0.4/30 ISP_B
(X)---(X
Dear ALL,
How can I implement a tunneling connection between two routers (Cisco 3600)
through already established leased line connection (serial line) which has
HDLC encapsulation up and running.
and how clients workstation contact the other side through that tunnel.
Kind Regards
abd quqas
I've done it with NT4 and 2000. I've never tried it with XP, but I don't
see why it wouldn't work.
""Manny"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all,
>
> Is it possible to use the windows XP
Hello all,
Is it possible to use the windows XP built in VPN client to establish a
tunnel with the PIX?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51873&t=51873
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
Timothy,
I don't think you will be able to form a neighbor relationship through the
tunnel with that configuration. What I would do is put the tunnel interface
on both sides in the same network rather than using unnumbered. Also, you
would need to add the tunnel network into the OSPF pr
Hello,
if there is one thing that i do at the very very end, that's the
configuration of password on ospf, bgp, ntp and ... name it. I try it first
without password and if it works i then apply the password. The problem
should be split in small blocks, configuration of the tunnel bein
it's working. Had a couple of issues.
First off, forgot to put my area 0 authentication on the tunnel. I
also had my tunnel source/destinations mixed up
Does anyone have any good notes they've taken on Tunnels?
below is the config for r2
interface Tunnel1
ip address 1
network it needs a virtual link beween r2 and r5. I did
that and it worked.
What i'm trying to do now is a GRE tunnel between r2 and r5. The tunnel
is up but r1 never
sees the routers that it did when the virtual-link was up. The tunnel
interfaces show up
can I ping the loopback on r5 f
HI Fabil,
Its very difficult to explain unless you give the exact scenario.Normally
you configure an access list for the VPN traffic and deny the NATing using
"nat (inside) 0 access-list " command.
Try the below link. You will find all the configurations there.
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Sup
Hello people,
Any of guys know how to configure the pix 501 to allow for a vpn tunnel.
I'm running PAT and trying to VPN to my corp site, no luck. Any
assistance would be great.
Thanks...Nabil
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
Message
iously not an expert.
You may want to open a TAC case for assistance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Firesox
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPSec to the tunnel endpoint withr IP unnumbered interface
[7:4
Folks,
I need some help with site to site vpn between 2610 and Avaya VPNet.
Avaya VPnet is configured correctly with appropriate SA and tunnel endpoint.
I have a router configured as follows.
Ethernet Inetrface has the public IP address assigned to it.
Serial 0/0 is an Frame interface to the
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
