: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
)
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \_/
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
On 9/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vote to go ahead and take the wiki'd proposal for a CSV component to
the Incubator.
[http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CommonsCsv]
[X ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260-2382
Take
/org/apache/commons/lang/IntHashMapTest.java
(original)
+++
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/IntHashMapTest.java
Sat Aug 27 03:26:53 2005
@@ -1,128 +1,141 @@
-/*
- * Copyright 2005 Steven Caswell
- */
-package org.apache.commons.lang;
-
-import
when more than one acronym is
used, as in getIbmSoapXml() instead of getIBMSOAPXM().
Onions?
Thanks,
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven
imagine writing my call sites like this instead:
new ReflectionToStringBuilder(obj).setExcludeFields(new
String[]{password}).toString();
Which means adding the set/getExcludeFields() feature.
Any thoughts?
Gary
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(c) 404-693-4148
(o) 404-260
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
if there isn't.
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and doesn't affect performance in the
tests I've done. It seems a small price to pay (a bit of adjustment in
reading the code) for the benefit.
If a line with a single semicolon is not acceptable, is there some
other parsable construct that would be?
Thanks for the indulgence.
--
Steven Caswell
.
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
it
indeed return false?
TIA
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-1 (rather inlcude in [lang] or [io])
Jeremias Maerki +1
Steven Caswell +1
Thorsten Curdt +1
Henri presented different code offerings a CSV component can be based on
(Netcetera, OSJava). There were no comments about this.
Any more input?
I had to back off to focus on the board
but doesn't work with the default setting in
PMD (it get reported as an empty statement outside a loop). I propose
to add a custom ruleset to the PMD report generated by maven to
include the catch block as an allowable place for an empty statement.
On 6/27/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
but doesn't work with the default setting in
PMD (it get reported as an empty statement outside a loop). I propose
to add a custom ruleset to the PMD report generated by maven to
include the catch block as an allowable place for an empty statement.
On 6/27/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
.
IMHO, an empty catch block is OK IFF it is { // documented in-line }. I
have my Eclipse settings set to warn me of this but I know not everyone
uses Eclipse.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:41 PM
To: Jakarta
-specified way to indicate an empty
statement, are ambiguous, and make it difficult for checkers to
discover.
On 6/29/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Caswell wrote:
Actually, I was proposing to leave the ; in to mark the empty
statement (sorry I wasn't clear).
I'd
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
v2.2 can have a better baseline to compare to
that doesn't have spurious style only fixes.
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL
]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system property in ${} with real values.
string = si.interpolateAll(string);
The class name does seem a little pedantic to me, but eh, I can't come
up with something more succinct right now ;-)
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Gary
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http
into it. Is that the intention of the comment? Do we want to
deprecate the existing method or just add an additional overloaded
method?
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 6/15/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need subreports for:
Commons-Lang
Done.
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
That's cool. Here is my +1.
On 6/11/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 19:50 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
Just one question about the jar:
The manifest indicates the jar was built with JDK 1.5. Does this
present any issues with running against previous
be welcome.
TIA
On 6/9/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:03 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
I'm planning to cut the 2.1 release this weekend if there aren't any -1s
before then, and I've never done one of these, so I'm wondering if there
is
any doc anywhere
You know, there is something in my browser software that turns on links just
as soon as I hit the send button (just kidding). Just after I send this
email I found the link on the page Simon referenced. Sorry for the noise.
On 6/11/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That document
The vote to release common-lang 2.1 has passed. The following people
voted on release Lang 2.1:
Steven Caswell +1
Simon Kitching+1
Gary Gregory +1
Phil Steitz+1
Michael Heuer +1
Fredrik Westermarck +1
Stephen Colebourne +1
I
that comfortably fits
into [io] or [lang].
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http
to get
the release done.
TIA
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
not require
a new RC, your opinion may differ ;-)
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http
]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
My +1
On 6/6/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that RC8
(http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1)
has been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the
2.1release.
[X ] +1
[ ] -1
:
Does this version include the mod to RELEASE-NOTES.txt to note the JUnit
dependency? IOW, has the RC8 been regened with just those little
changes? I think there was another small change someone had mentioned
post RC8?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto
]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
still need
BOTH checkstyle.properties and checkstyle.xml in SVN?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:38 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] Release Candidiate 8 available
Commons-lang 2.1
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
on Linux.
As with previous RCs, verification against as many JDK versions would be
appreciated, and a sanity check of the docs would also be welcome.
Vote to follow if no reports of problems.
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
and not under
1.4.2
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 20:05 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
That is so very odd. I'm at a loss to explain it. I don't have access
to a
system with JDK 1.3 so I'm not able to try it. Maybe someone else can
try?
I've also tried building with JDK1.2.2 on linux.
I got
Test builds under as many JDKs as possible would be appreciated. Any other
verification of javadocs, distributions, etc. are aslo appreciated. If there
are no issues found I'll call for a vote.
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
.
Thanks,
Gary
--
*From:* Gary Gregory
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:12 PM
*To:* 'Steven Caswell'
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* RE: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2
Steven:
(You're welcome
Glad you found it.
On 5/26/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
I found possible solution. With 1.3.1, if I set *fork* to *false*, the
test is found and run. Weird.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent
below on Sun Java 1.3.1_14.
Thanks,
Gary
--
*From:* Gary Gregory
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 24, 2005 7:12 PM
*To:* 'Steven Caswell'
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* RE: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
:206: Java returned: 1
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 3:28 PM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
All,
I have
so that is only run when
the Java version is 1.4, and add a note to the round method javadoc and the
release notes stating that the round method may not work properly in all
cases involving DST rollovers in previous JVMs, with this case as an
example.
Thoughs?
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL
1.6.4 and Java 1.4.2_08)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:39 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] DateUtils test fails under 1.2.2 and not under 1.4.2
All,
I have discovered a group of tests
be an RC7 with the date utils test change.
Thanks for your patience and thanks for testing these things.
On 5/24/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary,
I have a fix for that problem. I'll go ahead and put up a corrected source
distribution with the fix and without the DateUtilsTest
: The following error occurred
while executing this line:
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\build.xml:115: Warning: Could not find file
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\RELEASE-NOTES.txt to copy.
Total time: 54 seconds
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell
1.4.2_08.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:14 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
That seems odd since I used
is to include RELEASE-NOTES.txt in the source distribution,
but I wanted make sure there wasn't anyone opposed to doing so.I'm going to
go ahead and rebuild the RC6 source distribution with this additional file,
and if there is any objection we can discuss.
TIA
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL
with 1.2.2.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
No, my mistake, I should
Actually, never mind. I should have looked at the maven.xml first. We are in
fact trying to copy the release notes file, but the maven.xml has
RELEASE-NOTES.html and the file is RELEASE-NOTES.txt. I'll make the fix.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED
All,
I have replaced the RC6 source distributions with new ones containing the
RELEASE-NOTES.txt file. Thanks to Gary for finding the omission.
On 5/23/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary,
I suspect building against 1.4.2 and running against 1.2.2 will not work
due
version. As with previous RCs, a test of the distribution against
Java 1.2 would be greatly appreciated.
Here is the vote for making this RC the 2.1 release:
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-plugin-1.2
maven-vdoclet-plugin-1.2
maven-war-plugin-1.6.1
maven-webserver-plugin-2.0
maven-wizard-plugin-1.1
maven-xdoc-plugin-1.8
Home Build properties:
{junit.jar=C:\cvs-store\thirdparty\JUnit\3.8.1\junit.jar}
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
Gary,
Offhand I haven't a clue. I'll have to poke around and see if I can figure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a bit confused as to why you get a different result.
Indeed, it seems that your site is missing some information (the pkg
desc), while I get the full Javadoc generated. Weird.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL
/apidocs/ov
erview-summary.html
When I run a maven site:generate locally, I get the proper comments. I
am using Maven 1.0.2.
How can this be?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Jakarta Commons
about
an API removal, or if it's confused and Clirr is right.
Hen
On 5/4/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC5 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and
associated javadocs
and punctuation.
Hopefully we are ready to go with this one, so here is the vote:
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
package in not mentioned in RELEASE-NOTES.txt. I
also recall some
discussions a while back about text not being fully
baked. Is the
inclusion of text on purpose or is it meant to be
stripped?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell
[mailto:[EMAIL
Based on issues uncovered with RC4 (thanks to Gary and Stephen for working
those), I'll be cutting another release candidate soon, probably today
unless there are still issues to work on.
Gary, are you satisfied with where things are, or do you want some more
time?
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL
:
The Javadoc report:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/javadoc-wa
rnings-report.html
is nonsensical. Could this be a Maven plug-in bug?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 3:12 PM
,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 3:12 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] New VOTE on lang release
Release candidate 4 is in
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/http://www.apache
://people.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/developerguide.html
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 02, 2005 3:58 PM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] New VOTE on lang
Definitely should be in the dev guide. I'll add it.
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to checkout from the URL, thanks. Worth a mention in the
dev-guide?
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent
/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/checkstyle
-report.html#org/apache/commons/lang/CharEncoding.java
I've also fixed the same 120 length warnings in a couple of other
files.
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 3:12 PM
of 'CharSetUtils.delete(testtest, tr)' ? What about the other
methods used in the text, should they be put in code tags as well?
developerguide.html nessesary -- necessary
A non-binding +1 from me.
michael
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Steven Caswell wrote:
Release candidate 3 (and hopefully
anchors, that appears to be a maven formatting issue.
Again, not sure if another vote is necessary, since plenty of +1s have come
in for the previous RCs, but I don't want to presume anything:
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Heuer
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:22 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Steven Caswell
Subject: Re: [lang] (RE)VOTE 2.1 Release
A few minor nits with the web site:
Links before commas and periods have an extra space, e.g. lang status
I have posted the clirr report for review:
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/clirr-2.0-to-2.1.txt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 26, 2005 7:31 AM
Subject: [lang] (RE)VOTE 2.1 Release
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
and Javadoc (CVS
latest)http://people.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/apidocs/index.html
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:41 PM
*To:* Henri Yandell
*Cc:* Gary Gregory; Jakarta Commons
/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J I'll keep on looking.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2005 6:03 PM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Henri Yandell; Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re
/overview.html
Also, how about an RC-2 to cover the last batch of commits?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
/distributions/commons-lang-2.1-RC2.ziphttp://people.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/distributions/commons-lang-2.1-RC2.zip
still says 2.0.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:41 PM
] wrote:
Hello Hen:
Do you have 2.0 changed to 2.1 as local changes not in CVS? For
example in /lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/overview.html
Also, how about an RC-2 to cover the last batch of commits?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto
was making Maven use
this later jar no longer works in the latest Maven. So I was using an
older Maven version.
Hen
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone remind me how to handle the clover license? It's been a
while
since I tried a site build with lang, and I
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
on Windows as Linux. Different users is
another possiiblity.
As long as you add the new PATH entry at the front each time, it
should find that one first.
Hope that helps,
Hen
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a convenient way to install both JDK 1.4 and 1.2
On 4/17/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I figured out how to get clover to work by making the following
adjustments:
In project.xml, make sure the following properties are set:
maven.jar.override
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take
as part of the distro is very convenient for setting up the
development environment. I'd otherwise have to go manually find each one.
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original Message --
From: Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons
The bug author makes a good point. I'm +1 to making the change.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is
worth war is much worse
WildcardUtils look general enough that it could go into commons-lang, but then of
course you introduce a dependency, which seems to give some people a lot more
heartburn than it gives me. I hate to see classes put into the wrong library just to
avoid even dependencies that make sense.
Sorry it took so long to respond. I have to agree with the others that it is
too specific.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing
was
changing for the better. Granted I have only a few changes to make, and I
might feel differently if I had bunches. But again, making the API better
seems to be the right approach in this case.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest
providing the necessary
functionality.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling that thinks that nothing is
worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing
I went ahead and named it splitPreserveAllTokens, since that seemed to be
the closest concensus. It would be good if someone could review.
Steven Caswell
Sun Certified Java Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
degraded state of moral
), in which case I'll happily believe you. My
preference is too err on the side of verbosity and non-mysterious API
names vs. brevity ;-) The C days are long gone :-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 16:51
That does make things a little clearer. Perhaps it should be it's own
class, with a parse and a format method, a la SimpleDateFormat.
Ahh.
I like the yesterday etc part, but name definitely needs to change. Also I
would want a formatter for it (somehow) so we can turn a Date into
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
