Re: [Cosign-discuss] using weblogin.umich.edu

2008-02-07 Thread Mark Montague
ache HTTPD, including a U-M specific configuration example, are available here: http://webapps.itcs.umich.edu/cosign/index.php/Cosign_Wiki:CosignInstallation#Building_and_Installing_the_Filter Please let us know (or use one of the other email addresses above) if you have any questions.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] protecting directory with Cosign, Apache 2

2008-04-22 Thread Mark Montague
n problem but rather an Apache HTTPD problem. In any event, I recommend trying this just so that you know for sure that you're looking in the right place for the problem. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Production Team The University of Michig

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Trouble setting up test cosign

2008-06-30 Thread Mark Montague
sign). If you do not see the "220 2 Collaborative Web Single Sign-On" banner, then check your networking and firewall configuration. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Production Team The University of Michigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Trouble setting up test cosign

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Montague
with information about the University of Michigan weblogin servers. ] Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Production Team The University of Michigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Ch

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign authenticate subversion?

2008-07-11 Thread Mark Montague
O or X.509, but, if it did not, you could always add support for them and submit patches back to the Subversion project. I hope this helps. And, hopefully, other people will also chime in with their ideas and suggestions. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Produ

Re: [Cosign-discuss] "cosign_cookie_valid: Unable to connect to any Cosign server" errors & intermittent 503s

2008-08-13 Thread Mark Montague
ges of the production weblogin servers at the University of Michigan. Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], or another U-M mail address for U-M specific questions in the future. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Production Team The University of

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Different portal support with one auth server

2008-09-24 Thread Mark Montague
r especially if it is possible to tell whether a page should require authentication or not just by it's URL), then you're fine. But otherwise, you might want to use a different WebSSO product other than cosign and/or a different portal system. Mark Montague

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Handling server failures with round-robins

2008-10-23 Thread Mark Montague
lters are good at dealing with cosignd hosts that are down, so the main reason we move the IP address to another machine is so that some percentage of users don't get a "Server not responding" error in their web browsers when they are redirected to authenticate.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Using Cosign Authentication with WAMPServer 2.0

2008-11-26 Thread Mark Montague
ars of build environment, some changes to the mod_cosign configure scripts, Makefiles, and possibly source code may be needed in order to get things working. Please feel free to add anything you find out to the cosign wiki at http://weblogin.org/ Mark Montague I

Re: [Cosign-discuss] build cosignd on 10.5 client

2008-12-23 Thread Mark Montague
386): Mach-O bundle i386 mod_cosign.so (for architecture x86_64):Mach-O 64-bit bundle x86_64 $ Finally, note that cosignd, monsterd, and the CGI are only needed if you are setting up your own central weblogin servers. If you are at an institution that already has central weblogin servers

Re: [Cosign-discuss] build cosignd on 10.5 client

2008-12-24 Thread Mark Montague
or weblogin server components -- does anyone care about this? Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 4:02 PM, Wesley Craig wrote: > Let's address Mark'

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Query string

2009-01-07 Thread Mark Montague
when (re)authentication occurs. Is this using Apache HTTPD? If so, is mod_rewrite involved? Special care is sometimes needed to preserve the query string with mod_rewrite. Also, check your environment to see if it is being set there. If so, then it's a problem with PHP. M

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Daemon Directory

2009-02-23 Thread Mark Montague
ove files that are more than 24 hours old. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu -- Open Source Business Conference (OSBC),

Re: [Cosign-discuss] This friggin' sucks....

2009-02-27 Thread Mark Montague
P (e.g., mod_authnz_ldap for Apache HTTPD), a global database (MySQL or Oracle), one or more web-application-specific databases, Unix groups (via PAM or NIS+), or so on. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign reauthentication

2009-04-21 Thread Mark Montague
ie name requires reauthentication. The user will then be asked to reauthenticate the first time they visit that special web application, plus every 20 minutes thereafter, but other web applications will not be affected. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team

Re: [Cosign-discuss] 3.0.0 filter not getting kerberos tickets

2009-04-21 Thread Mark Montague
as to whether this works with mod_cosign. If anyone is able to try it, please let me know. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu ---

Re: [Cosign-discuss] 3.0.0 filter not getting kerberos tickets

2009-04-22 Thread Mark Montague
berosSetupGss On > > > Still results in no tickets and incorrect values for the directives in > *cfg Thanks for trying it, though. Sorry about the red herring. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The Un

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Can't Find Cosignd - Not Firewall

2009-05-29 Thread Mark Montague
L certs have passed verification as sslclient and sslserver certificates. Any help is greatly appreciated. What is not working? What are the symptoms of the problem you are having? Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The Univer

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Login error "Your browser is looping ..."

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Montague
files for evidence of what is causing the looping that you are seeing. Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Login error "Your browser is looping ..."

2009-06-17 Thread Mark Montague
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 9:27 PM, "Wen-Chen Hol" wrote: > What is the usual directory of "Cosign Cookie folder" for a redhat > Enterprise 5, apache 2.2.3, unisign 2.? > /var/cosign/filter Mark Montague ITCS Web/Database Team

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Apache Cosign 3 Filter Causes Re-direct Loop

2009-07-23 Thread Mark Montague
may require adherence to certain standards or policies. It's also possible to have service-specific service entries (which some people refer to as "exceptions" to the general policy, if one exists) that apply only to a specific cosign-protected web server and permit it to use a

Re: [Cosign-discuss] IIS v3 Config issue

2009-08-18 Thread Mark Montague
ertificate) and configuring HTTPS. Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 4:53 PM, "Will Kerr" wrote: > On version 1.0 I was able to host multiple sites us

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Certificate

2009-09-24 Thread Mark Montague
up your own CA and then configure cosign to trust that CA. (The root certificate for the CA may be self-signed, though; that's OK). Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@u

Re: [Cosign-discuss] IIS 6 Cosign filter

2009-11-11 Thread Mark Montague
o make it work. Out of the box, cosignd will log using the "daemon" facility. This does not appear to exist on MacOS 10.5; have you modified the code? syslog messages that are logged without a facility under MacOS X appear in /var/log/system.log Mark Montague

Re: [Cosign-discuss] service cookie

2009-12-30 Thread Mark Montague
od_cosign-2.0" is not a valid service line for cosign.conf. See the cosign.conf man page. Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu ---

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign.conf and Active Directory configuration

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Montague
neither cosignd nor cosign.conf get installed unless you run "make install-all" instead of "make install". Information on Kerberos is also included in README.weblogin. Let us know if you have questions. Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign.conf and Active Directory configuration

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Montague
config at all right now, although I think it would be awesome if it did. See lines 41 - 86 of cosign-3.1.1/aclocal.m4 Mark Montague (not a cosign developer, I just run it) ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign.conf and Active Directory configuration

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Montague
...however, this is just a random suggestion. I recommend that you go through the problems that other people have been having with other packages and see if you can find how they solved it. Also... have you successfully compiled something else using these Kerberos libraries? Best lu

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign.conf and Active Directory configuration

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Montague
tware packages and then trying the same thing with cosign. Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu On February 25, 2010 16:01 , "Simon Chang" wrote: > Well... > > Two

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Infinite redirect loop with test install

2010-02-26 Thread Mark Montague
logs for both your cosign-protected web server and your central weblogin server, as there may be clues in there. I hope this helps. Mark Montague ITS Web/Database Team The University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu On Februar

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Authenticate WITHOUT the cookies?

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Montague
P.S.: you are not subscribed to the mailing list, so anything you post will be held pending moderator approval. Also, you will not see any replies that are posted to the mailing list (I've manually added in your email address on this reply so you would see it). Mark Mon

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Authenticate WITHOUT the cookies?

2010-03-25 Thread Mark Montague
On March 25, 2010 10:57 , Mark Montague wrote: Possible solutions include: - Modify SWFUpload to send cookies. - Modify the 3rd party application to use a different upload system, one that supports cookies. - Disable cosign for the URL in question in order to permit anonymous or non

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Authenticate WITHOUT the cookies?

2010-03-30 Thread Mark Montague
ince the Flash application won't be passing cookies to the web server, the web application won't know who uploaded what. Effectively, all uploads would be anonymous. Mark Montague ITS Enterprise Email& Collaboration Technologies Team

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign ,sso problem

2010-04-20 Thread Mark Montague
th cosign itself, it's functionality that needs to be provided by your LDAP software. The situation is similar if you configure cosign to use Kerberos, or a SQL database, or hardware tokens. I hope this helps. Mark Montague ITS Enterprise E

Re: [Cosign-discuss] need mod_cosign.so binary (cosign 3)

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Montague
s repository: http://forums.opensuse.org/archives/sf-archives/archives-software/331878-where-apxs-libapreq2-suse-10-2-a.html -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and lear

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Two n00b-ish questions about upgrading cosign...

2010-12-16 Thread Mark Montague
Cookies you have in your local cookie database (by default, /var/cosign/filter) will be preserved. If you set special permissions, however, you'll want to be sure that none of the special permissions were reverted during the "sudo make install&

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Can I use CoSign with RedHat 7.3 kernel v2.4.20-28.7smp?

2011-03-21 Thread Mark Montague
licitly permit it (but there are good reasons why they should not permit it). -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and s

Re: [Cosign-discuss] U of Michigan specific question - UMHS networks, Cosign, and redirect loops?

2011-06-16 Thread Mark Montague
ckIP never", the multipath NAT problem is not a new issue. It was affecting clients behind the UMHS firewalls at the University of Michigan two years ago. I hope this helps. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] U of Michigan specific question - UMHS networks, Cosign, and redirect loops?

2011-06-16 Thread Mark Montague
f our Cosign-covered web > services? Is that what wolverineaccess.umich.edu and other central services > do as their baseline Cosign configuration? Yes, unfortunately. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- EditLive

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Looping in FF5 (probably)

2011-07-04 Thread Mark Montague
he URLs from when the user first visits the cosign-protected web site through the point at which the looping occurs. This will hopefully provide information as to what is causing the looping. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Question about multiple factors

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Montague
he validation URL for that service (note that I have not tried this, so I don't know if it would actually work). This is all a little kludgy, but maybe someone else can suggest a better way. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Question about multiple factors

2011-07-16 Thread Mark Montague
e hands of the person administering the cosign-protected service: the factor can be required (or not) on a per-service or even per-page basis; but hopefully most institutions would not need this sort of granular control, and so I think your solution is definitely the bette

Re: [Cosign-discuss] programattic access to cosign

2011-10-10 Thread Mark Montague
erl script you're writing authenticate using X.509 client certificates. Not via cosign's support for X.509, just via mod_ssl with a "Satisfy any" directive. -- Mark Montague LSA Research Systems Group University of Michigan markm...@umich.edu --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Alternative authentication for protected directory

2011-10-18 Thread Mark Montague
you might be able to get this to work with a recent version of Apache HTTP Server 2.2 (that is, not the version that ships with RHEL5 / CentOS 5!) and without any changes to mod_cosign. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Alternative authentication for protected directory

2011-10-24 Thread Mark Montague
quot;, "require ldap-group cn=umweb friends,ou=User Groups,ou=Groups,dc=umich,dc=edu"). So if you're maintaining an authorization list anyway, it should be just as easy to use that with cosign as with Basic Auth, and it would result in a simpler configuration ov

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign + mod_authnz_ldap debugging?

2011-11-01 Thread Mark Montague
porarily turn LogLevel up to "debug". No guarantees, but hopefully mod_authnz_ldap will then be verbose about what it is doing. At the very least httpd itself should report on the return values that both mod_cosign and mod_authnz_ldap are generating for each request processing h

Re: [Cosign-discuss] exposing COSIGN_FACTOR outside of a cosign protected area

2011-11-03 Thread Mark Montague
EDU [root@aeacus ~]# versus two-factor: [root@aeacus ~]# cat "/var/cosign/filter/cosign-aeacus.lsa.umich.edu=47GljWdqqR4TIFV7iRUB5v4wx9pzUprTzwBYwH-DHc71OKN2LLQRgEw7tSlwaCNtdFp0nFB3qcnDdDPAZxoJEHDWUk8PRfrPjufJ7BbbaIRD3z5FzsnxI4bOeZ3S" v3 i141.213.169.109 pmarkmont rUMICH.EDU fUMICH

Re: [Cosign-discuss] exposing COSIGN_FACTOR outside of a cosign protected area

2011-11-03 Thread Mark Montague
On November 3, 2011 13:19 , Liam Hoekenga wrote: > If I allow CosignAllowPublicAccess at the root, it looks like I'll > need to specifically negate it ("CosignAllowPublicAccess off") in any > subdirectories where I actually /need/ cosign. Is that correct? Yes.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Worker MPM

2011-11-14 Thread Mark Montague
at it's already thread-safe or close to it, but I'd be surprised). I'd love to see this supported, but I imagine that this isn't a high priority for most people. (and the latest release is 3.1.2, by the way) --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Emulate browser w/ a command line utility, access COSIGN protected resource?

2011-11-30 Thread Mark Montague
third curl command is or is not doing; the -v or --head options may be useful for this if the -w you already have is not showing you what's happening. Again, I recommend using a different type of authentication for scripts, such as client-side SSL certificates, if this is possible in you

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Emulate browser w/ a command line utility, access COSIGN protected resource?

2011-11-30 Thread Mark Montague
proceed normally, without needing any modification or customization. Take this with a grain of salt, however, since I've never set this up for Nagios, personally. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- All the data cont

Re: [Cosign-discuss] logout time delay?

2012-02-01 Thread Mark Montague
ected web site 2. User clicks logout link on cosign protected web site, which deletes the service cookie from the user's web browser and redirects the user to the central logout page. 3. User logs out 4. User tries to access the cosign protected web site again, but does not have a cosign

Re: [Cosign-discuss] mysterious user logouts

2012-02-14 Thread Mark Montague
rdless of browser? Regardless of device/computer? Is the user coming up against the idle timeout? -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most compreh

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Slow CoSign Authentication

2012-03-01 Thread Mark Montague
Web Inspector might also be able to do it. And there should be a way to achieve a similar result in Microsoft Internet Explorer, too. I hope this helps. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Virtualization &a

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Question concerning multiple factors

2012-04-10 Thread Mark Montague
ou want to do. For example, allow cosign to determine the user's identity, but then use the authorization parts of mod_authnz_ldap to compare the user's identity (as determined by cosign) to say whether the user is a member of a certain LDAP group, or is in a certain LDAP OU, and thus whethe

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign 3.1.2 SSL Error in Apache 2.2.3 on RHEL 5.7

2012-04-18 Thread Mark Montague
lowing the instructions for the FAQ "My certificate is verified, but I'm still getting vague and unhelpful SSL errors. What else can I do?" at http://webapps.itcs.umich.edu/cosign/index.php/Cosign_Wiki:CosignFAQ#Configuration I hope this helps. -- Mark Montague m...@

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign 3.1.2 SSL Error in Apache 2.2.3 on RHEL 5.7

2012-04-20 Thread Mark Montague
n authority that is trusted by your institution's central weblogin servers. Do your institution's central weblogin servers explicitly trust GeoTrust? -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- For Developers,

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Authentication Help

2012-06-21 Thread Mark Montague
u want to authenticate users via the cosignd protocol? If you can share both the requirements and why you have those particular requirements, we may be able to suggest a different architecture that accomplishes the same business go

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Authentication Help

2012-06-22 Thread Mark Montague
TE_USER to determine who is accessing it? If we know the answers to these questions, we may be able to provide more useful responses. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Unable to connect to any Cosign server

2012-08-08 Thread Mark Montague
tpd_can_network_connect set to "on" (run "getsebool -a | grep httpd" to see). Also if you're running SELinux, check /var/log/audit/audit.log for denial messages. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -

[Cosign-discuss] CosignModule Service Unavailable problem

2012-08-08 Thread Mark Montague
03 errors and this patten holds exactly for all of them (failure to read CHECK response on the first connection, followed by failure to read STARTTLS responses on four other connections). Any ideas or assistance would be appreciated, but if anyone else has seen this issu

Re: [Cosign-discuss] CosignModule Service Unavailable problem

2012-08-09 Thread Mark Montague
On August 8, 2012 14:39 , Phil Pishioneri wrote: > On 8/8/12 1:50 PM, Mark Montague wrote: >> Has anyone seen a problem with CosignModule for IIS where users >> sometimes, but not always, receive a 503 "Service unavailable" message >> when they first try to acc

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign integration in development

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Montague
te service [commercially signed and widely trusted], and UM Web CA [locally signed]). I hope this helps. If addressing these two things (creating a hash for the root CA certificate for the certificate used by your central weblogin servers, plus using a non-self-signed certificate in the Cos

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign integration in development

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Montague
ichigan/OU=ITCS/CN=UM Web CA/emailAddress=webmas...@umich.edu [...remainder of output omitted...] -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today&#x

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign integration in development

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Montague
script from the OpenSSL source code distribution, run: cd /etc/httpd/cosign-ca-dir ; c_rehash . Also, you should be able to see the same output for: [root@minos certs]# openssl x509 -hash -noout -in ./umwebCA.pem 5cc1e784 [root@minos certs]# Short form: fixing

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign integration in development

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Montague
t Speed 100 1334 100 13340 0 19974 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 21868 $ openssl x509 -hash -noout -in ./umwebCA.pem 5cc1e784 $ Once you get this, recreate the hash symlink by running c_rehash again. If you don't get a link named 5cc1e784.0, then so

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign integration in development

2012-08-17 Thread Mark Montague
hash symlink and you should probably use the same version of OpenSSL from the command line that you're using to compile mod_cosign. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclus

Re: [Cosign-discuss] using renewable krb5 tickets instead of kicking to login page?

2012-11-27 Thread Mark Montague
rs). If you get Kerberos tickets, then make sure that the default TGT and service ticket lifetimes are 1 week, too -- in addition to making sure that your KDC and krb5.conf are configured to allow this, you'll need to set the cosignticketlifetime directive in cosign.conf appropriately,

Re: [Cosign-discuss] using renewable krb5 tickets instead of kicking to login page?

2012-11-27 Thread Mark Montague
ew the ticket on their workstation, but reauthentication on the central weblogin server would usually happen invisibly, without the user being aware of it, and you would not be having the situation you describe -- which is the basis of my assumption that you are not using SPNEGO in your envi

Re: [Cosign-discuss] using renewable krb5 tickets instead of kicking to login page?

2012-11-27 Thread Mark Montague
s every request or 60 seconds after the last check, whichever is longer), the user will be immediately kicked off. This has the advantage that the user does not continue to have access to cosign-protected web services until their current ticket expires; they are completely

Re: [Cosign-discuss] allow from host on location /

2013-01-10 Thread Mark Montague
worked fine. If you encounter problems, it might be due to merging of configuration sections. In this case, use mod_info to help troubleshoot the issue, and/or make sure you specify a complete set of access control directives in each affected conte

Re: [Cosign-discuss] allow from host on location /

2013-01-22 Thread Mark Montague
terms of the configuration and access directive merging? -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Conditional Factors

2013-01-22 Thread Mark Montague
in the exact same way as the cosign filter redirects users. As you can see, this is a case where the second factor is enabled only for specific users instead of services, but we leave the decision up to the service, and initiate the action from the service. Even though this is not what you want,

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Problem Embedding Login

2013-01-22 Thread Mark Montague
If "count" gets too high, the cgi assumes that the user's web browser is stuck in an endless redirect loop, and it stops trying to authenticate the user and displays an error message to the user instead. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org

Re: [Cosign-discuss] mod_cosign looking for wrong hash value in cert name?

2013-02-27 Thread Mark Montague
d-line "openssl" utililty from that same version, or, if you use a newer version, you can use the -subject_hash_old and -issuer_hash_old options to the "openssl x.509" command to get the correct hashes. --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Needs parameters to configure cosign as Single Sign-On method

2013-03-06 Thread Mark Montague
be used to determine the user's locale unless the user is using a proxy or VPN -- is given by the REMOTE_ADDR server variable, if you are using Apache HTTP Server. (If this is not what you mean by "user locale", please be more specific). -- Mark Mo

Re: [Cosign-discuss] JCosign ssl handshake - Received fatal alert: unknown_ca

2013-04-16 Thread Mark Montague
give you a list of the CAs they have chosen to trust for this purpose. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The plat

Re: [Cosign-discuss] filter directory filling up (and tickets, less so)

2013-05-15 Thread Mark Montague
-type f -mtime +0 | /usr/bin/xargs /bin/rm -f $ You'll need a similar script to clean up old Kerberos tickets from your tickets directory. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- AlienVault Unified Secu

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Segmentation Fault using curl with Cosign 3.2.0 enabled

2013-05-15 Thread Mark Montague
a debugger to get a stack trace and post that here. I hope this helps. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibility with the essen

Re: [Cosign-discuss] filter directory filling up (and tickets, less so)

2013-05-30 Thread Mark Montague
each of your cosign-protected web servers (the machines running the filter which are not central weblogin servers) you want to delete old cookie files (/var/cosign/filter) and, if the cosign-protected web server gets proxied Kerberos tickets from the central weblogin servers then you want

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign filter and DNS changes

2013-07-05 Thread Mark Montague
to do this, I think it would be a huge benefit even for sites that are doing what the University of Michigan is currently doing (see Richard's message). -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- This SF.net emai

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Restricting Users

2013-09-20 Thread Mark Montague
2/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.html#requiredirectives https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/access.html -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ ho

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cloned Server: cn=login & host=login-dev don't match!

2013-11-05 Thread Mark Montague
t not with the email address you posted from). This causes your posts to be held for approval of a human moderator, as a spam protection measure. Also, if anyone just replies to the list instead of replying to all, you won't see their responses. I hope this helps.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Logout with mod_cosign protecting Tomcat application

2013-11-13 Thread Mark Montague
N_FACTOR}e env=COSIGN_FACTOR Most web applications would not care about the factors, only whether the user was authenticated. You would then have your Java code look to see if a request header named X-Remote-User was present and set to a non-empty value; if it is, the URI

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cloned Server: cn=login & host=login-dev don't match!

2013-12-13 Thread Mark Montague
this, make sure you put any root and intermediate certificates for the CA into the cosigncadir directory and generate appropriate hash symlinks. 4. Restart cosignd and your central weblogin server web server service so that both of them "see" the new certificate. I hope this hel

Re: [Cosign-discuss] how hard would it be to fix the post_error problem?

2014-07-09 Thread Mark Montague
cation timeout concerns for webapps that expect the form to be submitted within a certain window. 5. There are undoubtedly other concerns too. This might be a fun experimental project for someone with free time. -- Mark Montague m.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] how hard would it be to fix the post_error problem?

2014-07-09 Thread Mark Montague
the meantime, individual institutions that use cosign could modify their post_error.html to include a link to Lazarus and similar browser plugins so that the user could install one and avoid the loss next time. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org ---

Re: [Cosign-discuss] how hard would it be to fix the post_error problem?

2014-07-09 Thread Mark Montague
oft") timeout (2 hours) and detecting the cosign hard timeout (10, 12, or 24 hours) when as soon as it occurs. It's not nearly as good as your proposed workaround, but I've noticed that people of that particular webapp rarely wind up losing POST data. --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Does Cosign *need* to use LDAP?

2014-07-29 Thread Mark Montague
the user. But note that after this although the user would be authenticated to cosign, they'd still need to return to the web application so that it could establish its own session for the user, and you'd still need to configure the web application appropriately for cosign. Let me know if

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign Logout JSP - redirect after logout

2014-09-19 Thread Mark Montague
to be redirected to after logout as the query string of the logout URL, for example: https://weblogin.umich.edu/logout?http://www.lsa.umich.edu/ -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds.

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Cosign on Ubuntu 14 doesn't work?

2014-09-29 Thread Mark Montague
2.4. Hopefully other people on the list can take the discussion from this point. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?

Re: [Cosign-discuss] two problems while installing cosignd

2015-01-21 Thread Mark Montague
_cosign-1” cosign.conf is the configuration file for cosignd, not for Apache HTTP Server mod_cosign. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. Gige

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign 3.2.0 does not build without patching on Apache 2.4.6, new release soon?

2015-02-06 Thread Mark Montague
lient web server belonging to the institution rather than random machines. -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and develope

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign 3.2.0 does not build without patching on Apache 2.4.6, new release soon?

2015-02-06 Thread Mark Montague
s' back-channel certificate; client web server back-channel certificates can be either from the same CA or from a list of 3-4 specific trusted commercial CAs). -- Mark Montague m...@catseye.org -- Dive i

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign 3.2.0 does not build without patching on Apache 2.4.6, new release soon?

2015-02-07 Thread Mark Montague
he same in-house CA for all requests, and had the client web servers only trust the in-house CA for the CAS login server requests that they sent. To do this, CAS would have to allow server/ports in the URL for user logins than for client web server req

Re: [Cosign-discuss] stripping REALM from principal name?

2015-02-12 Thread Mark Montague
ust modify cosign.cgi to check (during processing of the POST) if the last characters of the username match @ plus the realm name, case insensitively, and, if so, cut them? It could even be submitted upstream and would be, by far, the easiest solution. --

Re: [Cosign-discuss] Please help - Cosign behind reverse proxy

2015-05-06 Thread Mark Montague
.2.3.4, or hostA.example.com before posting to the mailing list. If you are relying on security by obscurity (that is, if people can gain unauthorized access just by knowing certain details about your configuration), eliminate this problem before posting to the mailing list. -- Mark Mo

Re: [Cosign-discuss] cosign login with krb5 key (or tgt) possible?

2017-11-27 Thread Mark Montague
Kerberos ticket or X.509 certificate is valid. I am not aware of any institution that is using either SPNEGO or X.509 with cosign.  Either one would require explicit configuration, possible UI enhancements, and I don't think that documentation exists for either one. -- Mark Montague