zing rule. For some reason it's specified as
'inherit' in the reset. If you change that to 'border-box' your layout may work
as intended. Peter
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Hi Karl, I'm not sure what you mean by 'hard coded or inline'.
Make a test page and place an image:
The image will fill 100% of its container's width. It makes no difference if
the css is inline, in the head or in an external sheet.
Best regards, Peter
-
> O
liance requires image dimensions, I don't know, but if it doesn't
then I don't see the point of adding width and height to the html.
Regards, Peter
-
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 21:04, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> List,
>
> Somewhat CSS related, I have a question ab
I will be out of the office on leave until Monday 23rd February with no access
to email or calls.
If your query is urgent please use the contact channels on our website.
Otherwise, I will respond to your query as soon as possible.
--
Best Wishes
Pete Downes
T: 01424 720329
E: pe...@alphastate.co
;a' looks fine and correct.
Mac 10.6.8, FF v34.0.8 and iPad with retina, iOS 7.1.2
Perhaps it's an OS or graphics rendering thang rather than a problem with your
code.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.c
hen it doesn't seem worth the complication
of basing it on a 12-column grid - you can simply, as you say, create the grid
you need directly.
Peter
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/ma
Am new to mailing list and web development too. Could anyone link to CSS
material for creating mega drop down menu using CSS, right from first principle
? regards//Peter
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
On a Motorola G phone with Android Kitkat the text is quite large and the
text is tiny.
On an iPhone 4 all the text is the same size, and tiny.
Peter
El 13/03/2014, a las 23:31, Ezequiel Garzón escribió:
Thanks again for your reply. Now I'm really beginning to second-
e em in the css as one
thinks appropriate to the concept of emphasis.
I had to go to wikipedia for 'bikeshedding'. Must be my age.
Peter
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinf
> El 17/02/2014, a las 11:01, Philip Taylor escribió:
>
> Peter H. wrote:
>> I've always had a problem understanding why and are
>> supposedly more semantic than and .
>
> Because means "emphasised" and means "strongly emphasised"
> (s
ery unsemantic.
But seeing as and will be legit for the foreseeable future I'll prefer
them over and . They're quicker to key, too.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailm
, google, yahoo or email programmes like outlook and mail.
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://cs
Well, hey! Apparently, I couldn't see the forest through the trees! I built
the site years ago and the nav was based on the "CSS or navigation matrix"
(what some folks were calling it at the time) and was my first attempt at
moving from JS rollovers and sliced images. TBH, I don't remember where th
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Can we have a link to the actual site with the issue?
>
Try this: http://www.mdsol.com/conferences/mug/test.html.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.c
Hi All,
I've a sprite menu that I just updated by adding another menu item, "C-MUG"
to it. I've re-calculated all the numbers and everything seems to be set up
correctly. It's working correctly on jsfiddle (http://jsfiddle.net/gPNF4/)
but for some reason, on my development server and on the produc
chosen page loads.
>
> John
It's quite old now but Son of Suckerfish does the things on your list. It has a
bit of javascript to deal with "hover:" on old IE's, but if you're not worried
about that you can dispense with the script.
You'll find it at:
http:
it's ideal for lining up floated
items of variable height regardless of window width:
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
I notice that the link that Georg posted is still functioning so I'll take the
liberty of repeating it here:
http://www.gunlaug.com/con
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Why don't you set a width on the parent elements? At the moment their
> width depends on the width of the content (the form fields), which has
> different values.
>
> From there, if it is crucial for you that textfields and select b
ame styles to
them as what are used for the text boxes. They don't render the same so the
widths, height and padding elements had to be altered. Still the same issue
regardless.
Pete
--
*Peter Ankelein* | Sr. Creative Developer | Medidata Solutions
Worldwide <http://www.mdsol.com>
Hey Folks,
I've a landing page with some text and select box form floated left and
right (general float classes attached to them, not as part of the select
box styles).
http://www.mdsol.com/ad/clinical-cloud/index.html
The text input fields are fine but I'm having a difficult time with the
selec
thanks Georg, that's very handy. Peter
> -
> El 27/07/2012, a las 17:27, Georg escribió:
>
> an alternative to equal height floats, and inline-block are very often the
> best
>
___
7;float-' is a mistype (and doesn't exist as a
declaration) then there is no float declaration and the whole thing depends on
display: inline-block;
Is that right?
I wonder how far back inline-block is supported. When you say 'obsolete
browsers', are you referring to IE6
eing hidden in the
header's tags. If it was a standard body background image, then, yes,
I would.
--
*Peter Ankelein* | Sr. Creative Developer | Medidata Solutions
Worldwide <http://www.mdsol.com>
79 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003
pankel...@mdsol.com | direct: +1 212 91
Hey Folks,
I've been working on a landing page for an ad campaign and have it looking
nice (centered, fixed-width) on larger monitors. The problem is folks with
smaller resolutions where the width of the page is too wide, thus the
horizontal scrollbar appears at the bottom of the browser and page
in menu items show rules above AND below
(darkening on hover), whereas IE7 & 8 shows rules only on hover and only below
each item. Scrolling behaviour is also not how it should be in IE6.
Wouldn't Adobe Browserlab be a good quick way to check your ch
e handy for describing the quirks of Lucida Sans and Lucida
Sans Unicode on Windows:
http://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/2007/03/14/lucida-hybrid-the-grande-alternative/
Hope this is useful, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [css-
he gallery logo so as to control the kerning
and make it look nice.
On the desktop there's a double rule under Dakota which maybe isn't intended -
the thin white rule being very slightly wider than the grey one.
Hope this is useful feedback, Peter
n the second page, though I'm pretty sure its well within the bounds
> of the area it's sitting in.
>
Could it be just that the 2nd page draws a scroll bar, which causes everything
to shift to the left ?
Hth, best regards, Peter H.
_
, not matter
> how much text, or what size image, I put int there.
>
in case this is of any help: the only way I've ever found to reliably centre
vertically, is to use a good old-fashioned table. In this case, say, a single
row with a cell each for your text and your image would proba
, though. I owe you that much.
:-)
You could make the changes in the parent stylesheet and insert this.
/* WARNING, beware of the hasLayout genie.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html */
Could be the answer!
Cheers and thanks again.
Peter
--
http://www.p
why you think that,
but I'll take it as a compliment.
:-)
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
pere...@peredur.net
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/
;s worked OK in IE6/7: although I stand to be
corrected on this since I've only just started looking at HTML5.
Thanks
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
pere...@peredur.net
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://ww
d
that "transparent" needs a lot more cpu power and that for z-index
purposes only, "opaque" is better.
However, I see that your .swf is within javascript tags so I'm not
sure whether the above is
, etc. when laying things out.
I found myself trying them out during the build but wasn't getting the
results I wanted.
Regards,
Pete
--
*Peter Ankelein* | Sr. Creative Developer | Medidata Solutions
Worldwide <http://www.mdsol.com>
79 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003
pan
Hi All,
How can I get the height of a parent container to re-size according to any
nested container(s) content similar to the way tables work? Here's a sample
page that demonstrates the issue:
http://www.mdsol.com/conferences/mug2/amug.html
Right now, each 'tier' has a parent container at a fix
Hi All,
I've been looking into how to create an image-based CSS nav menu with 2
levels for the current site I'm building. This led me to Veerle's old "2
level horizontal navigation in CSS with images" demo...
http://veerle-v2.duoh.com/blog/comments/2_level_horizontal_navigation_in_css_with_image
On 01/01/11 16:23, Chetan Crasta wrote:
Happy to help.
Try the same hack:
#header img {position:relative;}
~Chetan
Yep. Just did. It works, too.
Just out of interest, do you know what's going on here? Or is it one of
those, "It works. Don't ask", sort of things? If I could get a handle
On 01/01/11 15:30, Chetan Crasta wrote:
ul#topnavlist li a {position:relative}
That is the hack that will fix the problem.
BTW, your page is not valid. The Crime, Cats etc sub-menu should be
within an.
~Chetan
Aargh! That'll teach me one of two things. Either to stop fiddling
when other p
Happy New Year to the list.
I'm just starting on the development of a site for an authoress and have
hit a problem in IE6 and 7 with the main navigation list. You can see
the page I'm working on at:
http://www.peredur.net/stella/template.php
The page is valid according to the w3c validator
Darn! This didn't work either! Vexing! But thanks for the suggestion.
Where you have you movie inserted in the html, do you have "wmode" ?
Like so:
value="opaque" />
If not, try that.
hth, Peter H.
__
Ar 12/11/10 23:21, ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley :
I'm going to have to play now to see if a border overlays a background
image or /vice versa/. Just as I was thinking about calling it a day
for today!
Yup. If you have a background colour and a dotted or dashed border, you
can se
the margin)."
I'm going to have to play now to see if a border overlays a background
image or /vice versa/. Just as I was thinking about calling it a day
for today!
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-disc
Ar 12/11/10 22:53, ysgrifennodd John :
In the CSS box model, are background images understood to occupy the
same height and width as the outer edge of the border area?
thank you
John
Border inner edge, isn't it? I.e. content + padding. Could be wrong,
though.
Cheers
Peter
--
out on the
"page-wrap" div in case you wanted to toggle back and forth.
Thanks again,
Michael
Is it because your content div only has floated content and therefore
has no height?
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
___
re the separation of structure
and format, I suppose; but good practise should make you do that anyway.
But at the end of the day - and in my opinion only - it's just a matter
of choice. It's producing *valid* HTML that's important to me, not the
DOCTYPE.
HTH
Cheers
a:active {
display: block;
background: #93c83d;
padding: 10px;
in your css, it would work better with:
#nav li ul li a:hover
Hope this turns out to be useful, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css
"Sorry, this page is not available"
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of David McGlone
Sent: November-07-10 11:39
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at
have anything to do with it? I suspect not.
Sincerely,
Brian M. Curran | CAD Consultant
Without having played around with it a lot, it looks to me as though
it's because your images overflow their containers.
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.p
check that stuff out? Preferably
something I'll have a fighting chance of understanding (given that I'm
pretty happy with the basics of CSS).
:-)
But thanks a lot for that. It's good stuff.
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
_
ard list style types? Or is there some other magic I can use?
Given the alternative, I might be able to persuade my customers to
settle for the standard CSS, but I'm trying not to give up without a
fight. So any suggestions would be most gratefully received.
Thanks in a
experiences with dreamhost.com, but there are lots of
other outfits out there offering similar things.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kisielewski
Sent: August-26-10 06:35
To: css-d@lists.css
Hi All,
I've been racking my brains regarding column control within a float. I'm
revising an event agenda that currently has two columns via a 100px left
float for the session times and a 425px right float for all the session
titles and associated content. The problem is now, many of the items in
t work in a variety of browsers? I just use FF
Thanks to all of you for your interest and advice.
--
Peter Lawson
Cape Town: 021-797-4493
France 06 18 28 96 43
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discu
;
background-color: #fff; }
.bl { border-left: 2px solid #ccc; }
Home
History and Structure
Groups
Constitutions
Concessions
Opportunities
Magazines
Links
--
Peter Lawson
Cape Town: 021-797-4493
France 06 18 28 96 43
(Ubuntu) and FF on Windows (XP). I don't have an example to hand,
though, unfortunately.
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/li
ght even succeed here and there in
seeding uninformed prejudice against one the most legible sans
currently available for common use, cross-platform, on the web.
As a starter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Carter
Peter H.
__
c
you wan
#left_main { margin-left: 1024px - 768px - }
But how many px in an em? This is dependent on you font-size and on the
device displaying the page. I believe the answer is to eschew the use of px
as a measurement everywhere, but that is a bit rough when you have pictures
in the mix.
Peter
SS to validate?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Duane Nelson
> Loss2gaiN Designs
> http://myL2G.com
>
On the one occasion I needed it, I used this:
Obviously you'll want to substitute your own selector.
HTH
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
for your help,
JYves
____
De : Peter Coates
À : "Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)" ; Stéphane
Carnot
Cc : css-d
Envoyé le : Lun 21 juin 2010, 14h 27min 46s
Objet : RE: [css-d] Re : IE8, CSS 2.1 & page-break-inside: avoid problem
It appears th
no
z-index is given, so they are rendered in the order they occur. If you
want, you could say
From: Victor Subervi [mailto:victorsube...@gmail.com]
Sent: June-21-10 10:09 AM
To: Peter Coates
Cc: Climis, Tim; CSS Discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] An Image On Top Of an Image
O
Wouldn't it be easier to construct the finished image you want, and define
the active area for the "button" with a ?
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Victor Subervi
Sent: June-21-10 8:36 AM
To: Climis, Ti
It appears that you are trying to avoid a page break in a div containing
several s. Your examples appear to work in Opera, but not in IE8. IE8's
support for page-break-inside is best described as "buggy".
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@
al Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Peter Coates
Sent: June-20-10 11:54 AM
To: 'css-d'
Subject: [css-d] liquid design for small screens
On a regular screen, the norm appear to be to define a container div of a
f
{float:left;width:all-the-rest}. In fact, all the rest would be a useful
interpretation of "auto", but that is not what auto means here.
This cannot be a new problem. What is the solution. I hope it is nice and
simple. I don't mind feeling stupid, and I dislike comple
n the arrowhead or on the
text.
Camino can be buggy with javascript but in this case all seems hunky
dory. Don't see why it would be a cache issue but it might be worth
emptying everything and relaunching.
Peter H.
__
css
You might find something of interest here:
http://24ways.org/2005/swooshy-curly-quotes-without-images
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: June-19-10 8:27 PM
To: Brian M. Curran
Cc: css-d
S
percent,
> the heights are the /same/ in Mac Opera, Mac Safari, WebKit nightly,
> Camino, and Mac Firefox [see below].
>
>
Just a guess..., but rounding errors when calculating percentages??
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
(see
w3schools)
HTH
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://
Why not use
ul {
list-style-image URL(bullet.gif);
}
I believe that is supported by IE.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Jay Carlson
Sent: June-15-10 10:13 PM
Cc: 'css-discuss'
Subject
ect I expected. Why not?
Peter
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tim White
Sent: June-14-10 7:24 AM
To: Gabriele Romanato
Cc: css-discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] Pure CSS fisheye menu with icons: a demo
> Hi al
at was the case, but had never seen it done so
didn't mention it. Thanks again.
I always have my heart in my mouth when answering anything on here. You
lot are so knowledgeable you're not going to miss a thing! Still, it
means that I learn something, as will as (hopefully) the
ty, for one thing. They should be used for what they were
intended, i.e. to prevent line breaks at particular points in the text
where a space would occur. For example, you would not want to see a
line wrap in the middle of a name, so you would markup
'Peter Bradley', instead of
the containing div will only centre it in IE
(IE6??), so you need to give the title container div a width and
automatic margins. Hopefully that won't mess it up in IE.
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-d
font list (in order of your preference)
that contains some more common fonts and ends with a generic font (e.g.
'serif' or 'sans-serif'
HTH
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.c
I think you want to have padding-left:10px;width:760; specified for
#divisions. I do not understand why you need to state the width for the ul,
but it makes the page work.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On
NET < 2.0 project and
then got ported to v2.0 or greater, thus changing the DOCTYPE to XHTML
1.0 Transitional. This has left you with loads of invalid code.
Shouldn't be that big a job to make it valid, though, as far as I can see.
HTH
Cheers
Ar 03/06/10 20:09, ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley :
>
> The validator gives 117 errors, Greg. I guess that this means that
> different browsers are going to try to recover in different ways. They
> don't look too hard to cure. Many of them are to do with the product
> table
x27;s the usual crop of missing alt
attributes, which I wouldn't think are affecting your layout; but
there's also a fair few where you appear to have used elements in places
where they're not allowed.
I'd have a go myself, but I'm a bit busy at the moment. If it
ou use Firefox's Web Developer's Toolbar and get it to outline block
elements you'll see what I mean.
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss
ow why it is desirable to have valid markup?
Cheers
Peter
--
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.co
You are trying for fluidity and a side bar. Here's a suggestion. How about
a container div width:100%. Then your float:left;width:13% left div, your
float:left;width:72% main div (as now) and your side bar as a
float:left;width:11%. Except the %s don't add up.
Peter
-Origin
> Yes, with scripting-- php (off-topic for this list). See SSI [server
>> side includes].
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Side_Includes>
>> Best,
>> ~d
>>
>>
>>
>>
If you have Dreamweaver, you can use the library system, but if n
neither after empty fields. I have tried all sorts of variants
on
input[value=""] + span::after {content:""}
but to no avail. It would appear that Firefox and Chrome both evaluate the
value= only on load, and not after the field h
Ar 12/05/10 21:10, ysgrifennodd John :
> I haven't been able to get a page validated all week...others seeing
> this too?
>
>
It's been very slow for a while now. It does work in the end, if you
can stand the wait.
Chers
Peter
--
On 05/05/10 23:16, John wrote:
> or just very slow?
>
> I've been trying to code-check a page of mine and it's been a good 5
> minutes of spinning gear for me.
>
> anyone else?
>
>
Yes. It's been slow for a while for me. I was thinking of posting
e
59 ul.MenuBarVertical ul Parse Error ]margin: -5% 0 0 -95%;
60 ul.MenuBarVertical ul Parse Error }
Correcting these may help. I haven't been able to check because I can't
get my hands on IE7 for the moment.
H
com
> Tom Buck
the menus seem to function as intended, at least on my mac - safari,
mozilla and opera (that's to say, the drop downs work fine).
regards, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http:/
relevant news story on Macworld
http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?newsid=3221204
Peter H.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
avid. You are, as ever, a paragon of patience and helpfulness.
I'm currently 63 and I just wonder how old I'll have to be before I stop
getting caught out by browser caching!
Thanks once again, and apologies for any time-wasting by posting about
things I ought to have sorted out my
tml>
>
I will.
>
> Points are not used to set type for the screen.
>
>
Aargh! I've no idea why I did that. Thanks for pointing it out. Now
corrected.
Cheers
Peter
http://www.peredur.net
___
t/tt280/pb88_sp.htm
Many thanks in advance
Peter
http://www.peredur.net
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
he main content in another DIV and style that one with
> overflow:hidden and zoom:1 to create a new block formatting context to
> "escape" the left float.
>
That's very useful. Thanks. I can see where that could
of the actual width of #wrapper.
>
> Not tested, but this usually works for me.
>
> Cordially,
> David
> --
>
>
Thanks, David. Yes I can see how that would work. I fixed it with
David Laakso's suggestion, but I'
;
>
>
Thanks, David.
It was the * html nonsense I'd forgotten. All working now.
Cheers
Peter
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http:/
t I have to do?
It's not absolutely essential that I get the pages working in IE6, but I
hate leaving a job half done.
The pages validate OK, by the way.
Thanks in advance
Cheers
Peter
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.c
On 19/03/2010 9:14 AM, Rory Bernstein wrote:
> Peter, thank you for this solution. It works perfectly. Now I just
> have to ask: How are the photos in #book_images being aligned to the
> bottom of the div? I don't understand what makes that happen. There
> doesn't seem t
x27;s no way of knowing unless you hover.
Best regards, Peter H.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://
and leave italics for
all the other browsers.
--
Peter Abramowicz
Arachne Web Designs
403.990.6016
www.arachne-design.com <http://www.arachne-design.com>
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.o
ing=0&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F
(It uses some Mozilla-only styles, I think, and some hacks to make sure
the page renders properly in IE6).
Cheers
Peter
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://ww
Actually, I'd let one of the columns size itself, to give the browser
some wiggle room. And don't forget that if you want borders and/or
margins that these add to the width.
Cheers
Peter
http://www.peredur.net
__
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
