http://goldbarter.com/viewauction.jsp?id=174
Viking style sword, not an antique but a good modern replica, "damascus"
pattern welded steel, sharp edged and sturdy enough to do real cutting
(eg: cutting tatami mats or cola bottles). Usable for home defence.
Yours for a minimum bid of 20 grams (
http://goldbarter.com/viewauction.jsp?id=174
See it, believe it, buy it. E-gold and GoldMoney accepted.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this crap
>
> http://www.standardreserve.com/
>
> gonna affect e-gold badly?
>
> Can e-gold make some sort of press release that they're at an arms
> length from "Standard" "Reserve" and totally disown them?
To those holding SR:
- If your currency provider is th
"James M. Ray" wrote:
>
> http://www.nai.com/other/jump/customer-faq.asp
>
> It's interesting (to me, anyway...) that Hushmail somehow finds
> a way to survive. It's probably just a coincidence Hush accepts
> e-gold -- and was the only one that ever did, right? ;^)
What amazes me is that hushma
I'm interested to hear if anyone has (considered, non-kneejerk) ideas as
to what impact the 911 attack and the govt's reactions will have on
e-gold as a system. Is the new "anti money laundering" talk likely to
make any hassle?
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
T
Goldlist Cynic wrote:
>
> Looks like the new moderation rules have finally done their dirty
> work...
>
> Even the valiant efforts of JPMay have been to no avail...
>
> Its very sad.
Hmm
Roughly remembered/paraphrased from a Terry Pratchett book:
`Dwarves sing about gold all the time'
`But w
Graham Kelly wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I'm now accepting UK depsits for gold, into my HSBC account. Details
> are at my site.
>
> Call me if you have any questions!
You definitely have my interest.
Is this:
- a UK bank account that will allow transfers using the normal
UK-mainland-internal method
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> Thus the gold price would have to rise to roughly $5500 per ounce
> ($25/1.26 * $275) for each unit of fiat currency to be 100% backed
> by gold.
Demand draws supply - if gold got that valuable, sources would be found,
and the supply would reinflate.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you familiar with those self-storage units you see by the highway
> where for $30 a month you can rent a garage-like room with a lock --
> and you can store say your excess furniture, old bikes, etc, in the
> storage unit?
>
> e-gold is
>
> *exactly*
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyone have a good name idea?
> >>
> >> "1mdc-checking"? "1mdc-bucks"?
> >
> >metagrams
>
> impressive, Julian - and quick!! :O
For that, I'll graciously grant you permission to use it gratis ;-)
---
You are currently subscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Anyone have a good name idea?
>
> "1mdc-checking"? "1mdc-bucks"?
metagrams
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you know that e-gold Ltd. stores more gold on behalf of custo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> People have spent *millions of dollars* developing and marketing
> online raffles, and then gotten lke "5" entries.
Here's a guess as to why - it would be my motivation to reach the same
decision:
- if you play an online casino and always lose, you know they're
croo
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > >Can you list 300 legitimate merchants that accept e-gold?
> > I notice the thunderous silence in response to Julian Dibbel's
> > question of a few days ago!
>
> Here's a short list of e-gold accepting merchants...
Something that's missing from your list: reputation. A
Alexis Golzman wrote:
>
> (2) Instead of paying for the bet, you would have to visit some sponsor
> sites. Anyone has suggestions about the number of sites that bettors would
> be willing to visit?
You have a business model based on advertising? Erm, experience seems to
suggest this is a bad ide
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> It's happening exactly like I thought it would. First, the spend page and
> then the home page... how long until there are multiple popups when the
> home page, or the spend page or any other page, is loaded? All of this on
> a paid service who's fees aren't being reduced.
GoldSpender wrote:
>
> Not all yet know about the crisis coming
> in the US,
What crisis?
> but I know and the best decision would be buying Gold (and also
> Chervonetzes) or Deutsch Marks (DEM) and later Euro EUR.
DMs will have to be exchanged for euros, they'll stop being spendable.
I've hea
major bosco wrote:
>
> So -- I guess it's OK for these GBC's to be under the thumb of the Royal
> Family and the BOE, but get one ounce within 100 miles of a US border and
> people start screaming bloddy murder!
Forget the bank of england.
Two places to fear:
- the EU, because they are a bunc
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2001, at 18:22, Julian Morrison wrote:
>
> > They will mumble about "aiding tax evasion"
>
> Well...then explain why the MONEX, FIDELITRADE and other
> bullion dealers in the US have been selling g
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
> But what can they do if the corporation is operating outside the
> country and has no asset in the country
They will mumble about "aiding tax evasion" or construe the website as
"operating inside the USA".
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yes, this changes everything. It's huge!
Ok, please explain: how does this help as versus buying from an MM or
from Omnipay? Or is this a thing that MMs themselves would be doing?
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >was pleased to see Doug's example of e-gold being able to help a
> >grandmother in Bangladesh right after he talked about how e-gold
> >could have helped an entire nation (Turkey).
> >
>
> Yes, all that left wing crap might make it more palatable to editors :) :)
>
Julian Morrison wrote:
>
> Craig Spencer wrote:
> >
> > Julian Morrison wrote:
> >
> > > a) If you do business with unidentified people, you can be dragged into
> > > their crimes, you can be swindled, and you can help crime in general
> > > pr
Dale Pond wrote:
>
> Craig Spencer wrote:
> >
> > Strictly speaking the problem is not that they are unidentified. It is
> > that they are criminals. Identification may filter out some of the
> > criminals but it does not filter out all of them and it interferes
> > with some perfectly legitima
Craig Spencer wrote:
>
> Julian Morrison wrote:
>
> > a) If you do business with unidentified people, you can be dragged into
> > their crimes, you can be swindled, and you can help crime in general
> > prosper.
>
> Strictly speaking the problem is not that the
The problem:
a) If you do business with unidentified people, you can be dragged into
their crimes, you can be swindled, and you can help crime in general
prosper.
b) If you force identity and audit trail of all people, you leave people
no way to bypass pseudocrimes such as being unwilling to be
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Alright, all you 'want ta hold e-gold back spend page purists'.
> > What's the matter with that? SHOW ME THE PROBLEM! :)
>
> From someone who has done numerous back-to-back spends for a couple of hours
> on end, I can give you my personal opinion that I want that confirmatio
"James M. Ray" wrote:
>
> http://news.independent.co.uk/digital/update/story.jsp?story=79745
>
> "If you don't have any facts, why waste valuable time asking for them?
> Just skim a few articles and then dream up whatever sounds right!"
>
I don't like the tone of these recent news articles. "un
Dagny Taggart wrote:
>
> e-gold does not have a patent in anything. So what do
> they have to offer?
Defensive patents are there to protect against patent lawsuits, not to
start them. If that's what he's doing, he's only sitting on the patent
as a means to wrangle a ceasefire if some other compa
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> On 25 Jun 2001, at 3:02, Julian Morrison wrote:
>
> > Patent
> > cross-licensing
>
> Hello Julian,
>
> Can you explain what you mean by the above ?
Jack has a patent on butt scratching and sues Jill.
Jill poi
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> On 25 Jun 2001, at 9:07, Sidd wrote:
>
> > Hmm, it would be very interesting to know if James Turk will try to
> > defend his Patent against these guys...
>
> Who knows what plans Mr. Turk has. We know he has another
> patent coming up. Maybe he is waiting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I doubt
>
> >4) Some large vendor starts to support e-gold
> >
>
> will happen while the sole business model is:
>
> "your new e-gold related venture can ... reach
> everyone on the e-gold mailing list!!!"
>
Q. How do ordinary people find out abou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I think you have it back assward there. What e-gold should do is say
> >"hey, currently were excellently suited to cottage industries - and
> >small web vendors are a vast market in aggregate. Lets push e-gold as
> >the ultimate way to run a mom-and-pop shop!"
>
>
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> [...]Everybody
> keeps saying how powerful the gold economy will be several years from now,
> and then coming up with schemes to make it pre-maturely happen today.
Agreed, it's a bad idea to rush adoption speed - you need a minimum
number of *working* *trusted* sites taki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am just saying "there exists no non-cottage-industry EREs".
>
> Hence, e-gold should say "since e-gold is currently only used for
> HYIPs (let's call a spade a spade) and a couple of novelty sites, and
> we really want some non-cottage-industry egold related enterp
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > > There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
> > > [...]
> >
> > There are other ways. The simplest:
> >
> > [x] notify me by email for spends worth more than [1] [USD]
> > [ ] do not let me recieve any spend worth less than [__0.1] [USD]
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Good idea, but I tried it already.
>
> I used a pool of known e-gold accounts to test how many people would
> read the message. Only one did out of ~ 80 tests.
>
> Next?
One in eighty is a droolable return rate on blind spam.
---
You are currently subscribed to e
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > Oo, oo, what'd I win? :-D
>
> A goldfish. Delivery will cost 1Kg gold. :)
Don't kid, there are probably Koi carp worth that much...
> > The problem that sparked this whole discussion is that it's trivial to
> > *push* money into people's accounts without their permiss
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > I want e-gold to remain a currency, plain and simple. I don't want them to
> > turn into some sort of ad house/paid-to-read program. Let e-gold ltd. do
> > what it does best, be a accounting system for it's private digital
> > currency.
>
> I think you're missing the point a
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> Leave e-gold alone! Let it be a currency
It already is vulnerable to push spamming.
All of my suggestions at least are simply ways to moderate this
vulnerability, although some others have suggested expanding the
vulnerability, which I disagree with.
I agree with you t
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > giving businesses the option to SPAM E-Gold's Email Addresses
>
> Am I the only one who doesn't want e-gold to officially turn into yet
> another place to receive SPAM from?
>
> There are two ways that a program like this could be implemented.
> [...]
There are other
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > If they want a halfass currency with elastic attached, which they can
> > jerk back out of the merchant's hands post facto, then the *merchants*
> > will be quite justified in telling them to take a running jump, once
> > they see an alternative is available.
>
> DING,
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Spam their *accounts* - an importat distinction; everyone gets it, not
> > everyone gets emailed about it. The others will still see it in theor
> > statements, if they bother reading them.
>
> Actually, I was thinking it would be more elaborate than that: It would be a
> sp
Here's another thought. For those who're appalled by the idea of
spamdonations and the fact that it's currently unstoppable, here's
another thought: egold could let you lock down how much minimum you're
willing to recieve in each of the metal types, anything above the
absolute floor which is e-gol
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Only trouble wth this is that the ad people are blinded to the amount
> > they need to spend. Perhaps another of those nifty graphs of
> > accounts-by-mass?
> >
> > So for e-gold what they should do is
> >
> > - allow email notifies of spends along with the memo
> > - allow t
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > So it's offered as an option in the setup screens, "notify me if
> > somebody pays me", and the default is "don't". Spends will still go onto
> > the statements, they just won't result in users recieving emails.
>
> That still requires e-gold to spend time & resources o
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > > All who want e-gold to be turned into a get-paid-to-read-mail program,
> > > please raise your hand.
> >
> > With the idea of spamdonations being out there now and trivial to
> > implement, I see little way to prevent it.
>
> I think everyone would go for it, if they could
Paul Ewing wrote:
>
> > > True, but with egold you are placing all the extra cost and all the
> > > risks in the hand of the consumer.
> >
> >When you underdstand that the greater risk and costs is not with
>
> >gold and gold currencies, but with national currencies that are
> >constantly debase
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> Being forced to dig around in the acct pages just to turn off that
> 'convenience' would also annoy the hell out of people.
So it's offered as an option in the setup screens, "notify me if
somebody pays me", and the default is "don't". Spends will still go onto
the statem
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> I am betting that we will see a massive move to gold and private
> money in the coming decade.
Which will annoy the national governments enough that they'll likely try
and legislate GCs into the ground, or at least tie them and regulate
them and require so
Ken Griffith wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's a cool idea if someone does it to you once. But, if you start
> getting five to ten ad spends a day it will clutter up your financial
> statements real fast. I think I would get pretty po'ed about it. But it is
> possible now, isn't it.
There's a good soluti
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > 2) Any business could use the feature, but they would have to pay E-Gold
> for
> > its use.
>
> The idea here is that E-Gold could set the price to allow businesses to
> 'Broadcast' messages to ALL account holders which subscribe to this service,
> (and subscriptions would b
PowerClicks wrote:
>
> >>> why would merchants push a payment system which delays the sale?
> >> How does e-gold delay the sale?
> >
> > I guess he meant that the customer must first acquire some e-gold
> > before he can spend it. A slower process than with a credit card.
>
> Exactly. You must f
Vince Callaway wrote:
>
> The idea hitting all of the e-gold accounts may seem like a good way to
> advertise except for 2 issues.
>
> First, how many of you actually look at your history (exchange providers
> excluded).
>
> Secondly, E-Gold does not notify people when money is placed in their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Well, why are there
> >>
> >> 0
> >>
> >> businesses that take e-gold?
> >
> >Zero businesses that accept e-gold? I can find a couple of hundred.
>
> Craig mate, I mean "serious" ones. Rather than "cottage industry"
> ones (like my crap ones, like Banana).
>
> (
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (4) i said, Oh, there's no method for reaching egold users
>
> (5) they said "what a fucking stupid conversation this is"
>
Suggestion: e-gold should have an "e-gold adverts list" with a
check-button to autosubscibe you on the account creation pages.
---
You are c
Samuel Mc Kee wrote:
>
> As I recall, Jim Ray said a couple of years back that he thought the Seven
> Deadly Sins (all of them vices, IMO) might be the key to promoting
> e-gold--sloth, lust, greed, vanity, and so on. Wrath is one of them, and the
> more e-gold grows, the more the banking system
Craig Spencer wrote:
>
> Forgive my ignorance... but how do I do that?
>
> CCS
>
> Julian Morrison wrote:
> >
> > Luc Van den Borre wrote:
> > >
> > > There's an article on Slashdot right now:
> > >
> >
> > If yo
SnowDog wrote:
>
> > I've said it before and I'll stand by it: money laundering is a
> > *fundamental human right*.
>
> Kind of a strange quote since the act of laundering money is to take 'dirty'
> money and attempt to make it look like 'clean' money. Since dirty money is
> defined as money rai
Luc Van den Borre wrote:
>
> There's an article on Slashdot right now:
>
If you support my stance on the right to launder money, please vote up
this slashdot comment:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=01/06/18/0229227&cid=109
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.or
That AP article has a lot of waffling from law enforcement types about
the "potential for money laundering" and statements from e-gold
personnel indicating a willingness to roll over and play dead. Shame on
you!
I've said it before and I'll stand by it: money laundering is a
*fundamental human ri
Michael Moore wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> Here is your article complete with photo of Doug Jackson
>
> http://wire.ap.org/?FRONTID=HOME&SITE=FLROC&enter=Go
>
> I can send you the whole copy if you wish.
>
> This is in the FloridaToday.com Site.
>
> My e-gold account number is 129542 (Goldtoday)
>
Dagny Taggart wrote:
>
> It should attract real businesses, instead of scams
> and porn sites!
Porn sites are real businesses, and the porn industry as a whole has
been the first adopter and best driver between nearly all of the recent
media technologies. From VHS to DVD to internet, and I would
Michael Moore wrote:
>
> > > 5. I will never disparage the Association or it's members or clients in
> any
> > > way.
> >
> > Which translates to "I will not slag off OSGold despite them backing
> > HYIPs and being a currency that calls itself `gold' but denominates
> > value in dollars, and othe
Ken Griffith wrote:
>
> As was pointed out before, licensing by the government has never proved to
> be a screen against bad operators. Instead it is used by the established
> bad operators to keep out the competition. There are plenty of incompetent
> licensed attourneys, doctors, and plumbers
Michael Moore wrote:
> 5. I will never disparage the Association or it's members or clients in any
> way.
Which translates to "I will not slag off OSGold despite them backing
HYIPs and being a currency that calls itself `gold' but denominates
value in dollars, and other such antics."
> 9. I will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Think of it as a Pascal's wager kind of thing - maybe you'll be
> "wrong" trying to do your part to combat global warming, but conserving
> energy and promoting alternative fuels can be its own reward - and if
> you're right it helps in the big picture too!
The Pasca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> However, the overall topic is so completely ridiculous on so many
> levels (example, reindeer cannot fly; man has in fact explored the
> north pole; we know where all known gifts actually came from etc)
> that it is important to realize that even the statement "santa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Nothing is easier than looking through a keyboard sniffer file and
> finding out what's going on, it's like reading someone's mind. You
> can see their common typos, etc.
>
> Experiment with any keyboard sniffer for ten minutes and you'll
> immediately get the idea.
For MMs (eg: eurogoldline) thinking of setting up to recieve UK funds, a
good approach could be to accept funds as cash sent via insured post.
The chances of cash not clearing are near zilch, especially with
hard-to-forge British money.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@
Frank Zuchristian wrote:
>
> Euro Gold Line is presently setting up accounts in
> several countries, of which the UK will probably be
> the first. Hopefully these should start to appear as
> early as next week.
>
> When the country becomes available, there will be
> adjustments made to the rate
"James M. Ray" wrote:
>
> At 04:13 PM -0700 06/10/2001, Craig Spencer wrote:
> ...
> >
> >Gold is one of the greatest threats to the whole socialist world view.
>
> Hmm. Maybe I was wrong to use the word "socialist" (since hardly any
> socialists call themselves socialist anyway, these days). Wh
Craig Spencer wrote:
>
> > In that spirit, I understand very well that they need money to support the
> > Party, but I don't think they need it until 2006. I'm going to send them a
> > post-dated check--dated 15 April 2006--along with a letter explaining why.
> >
> > I encourage others to do the
Luc Van den Borre wrote:
>
> | I'm sure you could test for this with a "seismic" approach - sound
>
> Or just hit it with a (small) hammer - I bet tungsten will sound different from
> gold.
> And you could test the electrical conductivity. This is done in arcade machines
> (coin drops past a mag
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > Gold: 19.3 g/cm^3, $8820/kg
> > Tungsten: 19.25 g/cm^3, $110/kg
>
> A 400 oz. 'gold' bar will have a 32.2 grams lighter than a true gold bar.
>
> A 400 oz. gold bar occupies 645.2 cm^3; and has dimensions of 12.2 cm x 33
> cm x 1.61 cm. This makes for a total surface a
On the balance page, when one picks a currency, the page refresh should
set a cookie - and that page should always from then on load with the
chosen currency, until it's changed again.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >The US legal system throws more people in jail than in any other
> >country of the world, yet the US crime rates are some of the highest
> >too.
>
> Right -- they get thrown in jail for consensual crimes, ie, crimes
> with no victims.
>
> Who gives a rats ass i
offshoresurfer wrote:
>
> The US legal system throws more people in jail than in any other
> country of the world, yet the US crime rates are some of the highest
> too.
How many of them are for halfassed pseudocrimes such as tax evasion,
drug use, whoring, gambling or ignoring silly bureaucratic
Ken Griffith wrote:
>
> Actually, Julian, in real life there are always criminals and sluggards no
> matter how harsh the punishments against it or how great the incentives not
> to be.
Probably.
> The US legal system throws criminals in jail. They used to have to
> work in chain gangs. That
Ken Griffith wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say "always".
>
> Slavery might be more productive than freedom for unmotivated individuals
> who gravitate to the bottom of society anyway.
In a free socity, unproductive individuals are motivated to become
productive by the fact that they won't eat otherwise
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > Do you really think that slavery produces wealth?
>
> Yeah, but not for the slaves.
>
Slavery always destroys *potential* wealth, by nullifying the potential
creative contributions of the slaves. It also weakens the incentive
toward technical and scientific progress by
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2001, at 0:42, Julian Morrison wrote:
>
> > wonder how long 'til they run out, if they carry on playing silly
> > buggers with gold prices?
>
> Experts estimations are that the CB's are pretty much
"C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." wrote:
>
> > And I wonder how
> > much is in central bank vaults,
>
> Roughly 33,000 tons... in theory. A lot of it has been leased,
> melted and sold on the market.
I wonder how long 'til they run out, if they carry on playing silly
buggers with gold prices?
---
Yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I believe MMs in popular world cities (ie, probably American cities)
> could do a RAGING business in selling e-gold at a modest price over
> spot, for cash.
>
> The good thing is, then peope wanting egold can get in
> instantaneously. The only danger would be counter
Andrew McMeikan wrote:
>
> Perth Mint (perthmint.com) has unallocated storage with no agio, but a fee
> for re-issuing ownership certificates whenever the amount has to change.
>
> http://perthmint.com/depository/pmcp/product.shtml
>
> I really need to go and visit these guys and see how hard i
"Eric J. Gaither" wrote:
>
> Julian,
>
>Agreed, however, people already complain if their accounts are not funded
> within HOURS of making a payment. Asking them to wait days
Making it upfront - calling it something like "SlowCheapGold" and saying
"we guarantee delivery within ONE MONT
"Eric J. Gaither" wrote:
>
> MCF,
>
>I have one comment:
>
>It is rather COSTLY to be an Exchange Service Provider (or Market Maker,
> Exchange Agent, Cambio, etc.) due to the fees assessed by the banks, the
> gold currencies, and paying a staff's wages. Then there are taxes,
> insuran
Samuel Mc Kee wrote:
>
> > So if so many policy makers seem so comfortable with having no
> > control over
> > their interest rates and exchange rates, and forcing their economies into
> > inflation and deflation, why not peg the currency to gold and go for free
> > banking?
>
> Sounds good to m
The Snipper wrote:
>
> I have read one of Lance Spicers books. The Scams & Frauds one. This is a
> book that many in the e-gold world should read. It specifys who is behind
> most of these scams that poliferate the e-gold economy.
>
> A lot of people will sit up and take notice when they read
Dagny Taggart wrote:
>
> I forgot to ask: Can I buy coffee with DigiGold?
Why ask the list? Ask the folks that are selling it.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob wrote:
>
> Screw the Euro.
The euro is in a permanent state of being operated by the reddest
organization north of Beijing. As such it will be taxandwasted and
politically fiddled to the point of uselessness.
Leastaways that's how it looks to me.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-
Frank Zuchristian wrote:
>
> I noted comments about not being able to access
> e-gold's site yesterday.
>
> On Wednesday for more than half a day, I was not able
> to access the site, yet at the same time, Paul, Ice
> Gold reported no problems.
>
> Friday morning, and the problems is repeating,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Julian, for the average consumer there is no doubt you are correct. For a
> business or bank moving thousands or millions of dollars, the risk of loss
> is definitely worth the hassle of getting the smart card.
Of course. (And this is actually consistent with my "la
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Julian's law of security: nobody but spooks will pay for security that
> calls them an idiot."
>
> Good software makes the security virtually invisible. People don't mind
> carrying cards around in their wallets. They already do. If someone
> produced software an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The technology is out there, but so far there hasn't been much
> implementation of it. I wonder why?
Julian's law of security: nobody but spooks will pay for security that
calls them an idiot.
(Where "pays" is either in terms of money or of fuss-and-bother.)
---
Y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Regarding the below, my interpretation is that the Canada Government,
> guarantees that WHEN YOU PURCHASE A MAPLE FROM THEM, it is actually
> one ounce of actual gold.
>
> (That strikes me as entirely unremarkable, actually. For instance
> "Ford" motor company total
"James M. Ray" wrote:
>
> http://www.free-market.net/forums/e-gold0008/messages/992155539.html
>
> Read all about it at the URL above. Take care, this friend was expecting an
> attachment and made the mistake of opening this thing instead!
There's this nice little antivirus program I recommend
Viking Coder wrote:
> The credit card companies have one thing over e-gold that will make it
> hard to break into the "popular offline" group; namely, credit. You can
> use your credit card without having the money on hand; can't do that with
> e-gold.
Do people actually *want* credit? I know I
Viking Coder wrote:
>
> > I predict by 2020 fiat money will be an amusing anachronism.
> >
>
> Remember JPM's last stats contest?
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e-gold-list@talk.e-gold.com/msg03208.html
>
> If e-gold continues to grow at the phenomenal rate it has had for the past
> 2 years,
Much nastyness. But in any free enough system, bypassing all that cruft
carries a competitive advantage.
I predict by 2020 fiat money will be an amusing anachronism.
I also predict laws will try to put the genie back in the bottle between
now and then - I hope e-gold, goldmoney etc have taken st
Bob wrote:
> >relaxing green blocks on power production,
>
> The latest I read is the Artic is now off limits (again) to new
> oil production. He reneged again.
Nah. At most he'll greenwash it. Al G. woulda slapped in nationwide
price fixing, and tried to force the electricity industry to employ
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
