to Eugene Oregon.
If you have any questions, let me know.
Troy Meyer - MCSE, MCITP:EA
System Administrator
Information Services
University of Oregon
desk: 541-346-8092
fax: 541-346-6438
How about a list of applications on the box?
BES?
-troy
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange and MSDE
All -
There is an MSDE instance on an Exchange box and i'm trying to figure out
+1
Have his 2007, will probably spring for this one as well.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 books
I would go with this one'
Mastering Microsoft
And to answer the other questions:
BES wont work with non Blackberry SOFTWARE phones. Some newer Nokias support
BB push, but they have a Blackberry Software component on the phone.
If you are looking for a unified push infrastructure (like Kurt's comments
rightly emphasize). You might try
John,
I sadly don't have a 2007 environment anymore to test on, but I believe
you are correct. If you set the activesync externalurl setting for a
specific address, that is all you should require to have open from your
side to allow EAS access for iphone.
Robert,
CALs are based on access according to:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2007/howtobuy/default.mspx#EKC
with regards to distro groups and contacts, there is no server access
from a user or device, so you do not need to purchase a cal.
-troy
From: Robert Peterson
Don you are thinking original iphone which didn't have full exchange
support. The new firmware update (2.0 I believe) gave exchange
activesync support and then the most recent (3.0) added on some
additional calendar functionality.
You shouldn't need anything besides activesync running
I just got the same message Larry got when I attempted to login, but was
able to re-register using Simon's link.
They must actually be tracking answered questions and restricting folks
who are watching only; I know Simon posts there every once in a while,
so that perhaps helps his case.
-troy
John,
As posted any monitoring software can do this as long as its sending
email direct to the internet or has a smart host that ISNT exchange.
Nagios is a good solution but it isn't easy or quick to get setup. We
use nagios on RHEL with a separate host running nagios-wsc to proxy wmi
John,
There are several ways you can have you F5s configured, but generically
you should be able simply install the cert that is assigned to the f5
shared interface to the individual interface on your owa host?
-troy
From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Thursday,
Documentation abounds on this subject.
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/10/27/429522.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124008.aspx
along with about a million other blogs on folks' experience.
Plan well and you should be fine.
-troy
-Original Message-
From:
Hey Andy,
I am sure you have seen this already, but powergui is a pretty nice free
IDE for powershell. I use it 'often'
http://powergui.org/index.jspa
As for add-ins, I am fairly standard with my scripts so that they will
run on any server that has the EMC. If you search codeplex.com
Jeremy is correct, if you grant 'Send-as' permission the from line can
be used and it will appear from the other user/group. We used to do
this extensively with resource and administrative users (think
postmas...@x.com).
If you are having issues sending on behalf rather than as, I would
Definitely a powershell task. In fact, I think I like the
export-mailbox command BETTER than Exmerge.
Assuming all users are in the same org, mailbox server location
shouldn't matter. Something generic like
$personlist = Get-content peoplelist.txt
Foreach ($peep in $personlist) {
Sure you can use your internal CA, you can even use self signed. The
issue is trust. Do your clients all inherently trust your CA or a self
signed?
How will you be using TLS ? Say it was only domain members sending
through SMTP and group policy forces all computers to trust your
internal CA,
I don't know where you heard this, but its pretty common knowledge that they
have full rich OWA working on safari and firefox for the next exchange release
(think windows live in firefox). It would be nice if they released an update
for 2007, but the fact that they are actively working on it
://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/09/13/428901.aspx
But very glad to hear your news.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group Calendering and OWA
I don't know where you heard
Evan, don't be down on yourself, I bought 1000+ shares of our stock last July
at a screaming deal, and we filed chapter 11 2 weeks ago. Foolishness is in
the eyes of the beholder (In my case the wife is the beholder and she told me
not to do it last year BAMMM)
Depending on the number of
I love the MS solution if it happens to a PF database. YIKES!
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:st...@optimum.bm] On Behalf Of Exchange (Sunbelt)
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Named Property Limit
Is it just me, or is
Couple ways to solve this issue.
1) Manipulate DNS (horrible idea, cant believe I included it as an option) |
This will only get you so far, but depending on how your name space is setup,
they may be able to manipulate where those autodiscover queries are resolved to
internally.
2) Custom
, March 12, 2009 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Autodiscover service and multiple exchange environments
Will that involve doing any work on the client side?
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:30 AM
who's hitting that
CAS server by blocking the networks in the other domains/forests in the CAS
server's firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Autodiscover service
No, you are thinking of small business server, and I d�t believe SCR will
work with that.
Every average Exchange 2007 admin I know has a substantial amount of Powershell
knowledge. Some more than others, but I have a hard time imagining an
enterprise rollout of 2007 without some people (
A much nicer way to achieve the point I was looking for.
Guess I need more coffee in the morning.
Thanks Sean
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 SCR --
Perhaps a reason why we love discussing phones so much?
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-03-10/
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Come on Don,
You have seen this before?
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2004/07/12/180899.aspx
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OOF's was RE: Can some one
My favorite is the Motorola 2950
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Motorola2950.jpg
No email, contacts, calendar, or web.
Also does not have voice dialing.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Gene Giannamore [mailto:gene.giannam...@abideinternational.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009
Its too flocking big! Yeah I love my ipod touch but sheesh.
What happened to that BB Pearl flip? I never saw that come available through
our reps, is it around?
Or what about Windows Mobile flips? Am I the only person that wants a small
phone that fits in my pocket?
-troy
-Original
Whoa.
Dan there are lots of books available for Exchange 2003, but a strict
troubleshooting book might not be the biggest help if you don't understand how
things are moving under the hood (if you gave me a troubleshooting IOS book, I
would give you the finger). I recommend a more complete
Sorry about that, I obviously underestimated your experience with the product.
Include this MS Press book in your list of books to check out.
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Exchange-Server-2003-Resource/dp/0735620725
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Hood
Michael I think he was moving from E2K3 to another E2K3 server so that article
and the EMC might be a bit deceiving.
John, what was your process? On the new server you created a new public store
and then from the System Manager you added that new store on the replication
tab of your specific
Did I miss something here, doesn't Outlook automatically show your Exchange
server address lists? You can have only one default GAL per person, but you
can have other address lists that are published to Outlook and kept up to date
automatically.
I can see perhaps copying to local contacts for
Oops,
Looks like I misread, yes WM 5 and up have GAL lookup so you don't need to sync
the address book, choose company directory when you are looking up a contact
and it will retrieve the info from the server.
+1 with Don, static entries that require manual updating are a lousy way to go.
...@abideinternational.com
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Copy GAL to outlook contact folder
Absolutely!
On a touchscreen Wm 6.1
Contacts - Menu - Company Directory
-tm
2007) Internal vs. Eternal
I think you are on the correct motorcycle. The article below is how I fixed
this issue with us.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940726
From: Troy Meyer [troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:09 PM
Scott,
Do you have public folders in your new 2007 environment? If so, are mailboxes
in 2007 defaulting to a 2007 public folder replica ? If so are you replicating
your First Administrative Group Free/Busy public folder to that 2007 replica?
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Scott
You are in luck!
When you are new to blackberry they give you 30 days of free support (maybe
more, I cant remember). And they will assist you in setting up the server and
making it hum!
If you aren't doing a new install and you just inherited someone else's BES,
then you are in even more
Yes, there is an easier way.
I whitelist at the gateway so I don't know the specific exchange command, but
first I would use a variable for the address so you don't have to mod you
script every time. Something like
Write-host Give me your address please:
Read-host $whiteaddy
I am not sure
+1
if you are not super familiar with the management shell yet, use exmerge and it
will save you some time. You can get it at download.microsoft.com if you need
a copy. Remember it needs to be ran from a 32 bit machine with Outlook
installed (ie not your 2007 servers).
Good luck
-troy
below is how I fixed
this issue with us.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940726
From: Troy Meyer [troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Multiple cert (Ex 2007) Internal vs. Eternal
My
stopped and she is feeling better.
Thanks for all the help.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem
I haven't run into this issue before, and from
My money is on the autodiscover service using an internal cert and causing the
prompt when Outlook 2007 looks for availability info
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397225.aspx
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent:
Webmail really shouldn't have anything to do with Outlook local MAPI access.
AND you MAPI profile doesn't care about valid certs.
Try this:
Open Outlook 2007
Hold ctrl and right click the Outlook icon in the notification area (clock area)
Select test email auto configuration
Uncheck guessmart
Saw that this morning, dang I wish we would get multi-browser full featured OWA
in Exch 2007.
I had noticed that hotmail (or live mail as they call it now with a 14 backend)
now gives full features in firefox...
-troy
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics
-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Multiple cert (Ex 2007) Internal vs. Eternal
Webmail really shouldn't have anything to do with Outlook local MAPI access.
AND you MAPI profile doesn't care about
+1 I'll bet there is some sweet corrupt HTML email in Outlook somewhere that
doesn't give OWA the least issue.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
, February 11, 2009 3:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Login problem
The easiest way I've found to fix it if it does is move the mailbox to another
mail store, and tell it to skip corrupted items.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com
OWA != OA
If you are using OA you are most likely NOT on a public computer.
I have found that our salespeople love the ability to use OA rather than VPN if
they don't need access to other apps. The nice thing is that it is completely
automatic too, if you are on VPN - MAPI if not - OA.
Matt B,
That is not true, the 2007 CAS hosts OWA for both 2007 and legacy clients, it
shouldn't forward the traffic on.
Matt D,
Are you getting little red Xs where images should be? Or are there just
specific components that don't show up?
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Matthew
Hey Kevin,
What happened to the idea of using a transport rule to raise the SCL and thus
move those mails to the junk email folder? Did the rant between Ben and
Michael ever rule that option completely out (IE can text based IMAP clients
see the junk mail folder) ?
If not, a little bit of
What type of authentication are you using? If you are internal using
integrated auth, you need these settings:
1) internet options - advanced - Enable Integrated Windows Auth
2) if the site is in the trusted sites zone, make sure the custom setting of
automatic logon with current user name
Out of the box your choices for assigning email addresses are:
By State or province
By Department
By Company
By Custom attribute
I think OU would have been a great idea, but alas no love. We ended up using
Company and setting the company by OU in powershell then making it a part of
our new
You allow your department distribution lists to receive mail from external
senders?
Seems like the easiest way around this one is to create a group and only allow
that people in that group to send to your distro list.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Jim Dandy
: RE: Return address
Is that possible if people on the list don't have an exchange mailbox?
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Return address
You allow your
BES 4.1.6 on Exchange 2007sp1 ~35 users.
We would like to create an IT policy that sets the default browser on the
phones to be the IBS or Internet browser rather than the BB browser so that
folks are using the EVDO network for internet browsing rather than our local
network connection.
We
environment?
I have a DNS entry for Autodiscover.sparling.com that points to the original
CAS server
...Tim
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007
/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 4:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dueling Exchange server
Jim,
I don't think you can have separate Exchange orgs in the single forest. That
being said, why would you
Steve,
You are on the right track, you need two different certs. One internally
signed that uses the computername and is used for encrypting exchange traffic
between 2007 servers. The other public certs related to OWA and OA, use
external names, and are completely different.
Use
Jim,
I don't think you can have separate Exchange orgs in the single forest. That
being said, why would you want it? If you separate companies, wont you be
creating a new forest and domain structure for at least one if not both
companies? Since you will most likely be migrating user accounts
Michael,
I like that you mix up your articles between code\technical and conceptual and
think you should continue that approach. For me I think tracking down
information on how to do specific tasks in PoSH is fairly trivial, but
understanding stuff is more important (ie your last article on
And lots of rainbows.
--
ME2
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Webster carlwebs...@gmail.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Subject: RE: Article ideas
Michael
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net wrote:
There has to be a Helo Kitty joke in there somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Article ideas
Michael
TLS for what?
All of our servers encrypt their internal communications with TLS is that what
you mean? Our external traffic is all encrypted with SSL (OWA, EAS, OA).
If I was relaying external SMTP traffic (which you would REALLY have to sell me
on as to why you need it) I would definitely be
Hey Shay,
I don't know of an easy way, but Glen has some tips on using EWS to do it on
his blog here:
http://gsexdev.blogspot.com/2008/02/class-library-to-help-setting-out-of.html
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31,
Andy,
If that is simply a FE OWA box, running the uninstall should be enough for you
to decommission it. We had a similar setup as you describe at two locations and
its seemed to go fairly straight forward.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerahs.com]
I will bet you are on the right track and that if they had a quick consultant
come in and setup Exchange they didn't spend any time on setting up the
autodiscover service.
Great link though, I have never seen that and it's a great help for external
testing.
-Troy
-Original Message-
Just to add to this thread, if you are running 2007 you can use the EMS
Get-PublicFolder \ -Recurse | where {$_.MailEnabled -match True}
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange
To add to that, the poor man can create his own Exchange monitoring from a
crummy workstation running the exchange management shell and having its own
external smtp destination.
Parsing test-servicehealth and get-queue can give you a pretty good idea of
what is going on with your 2007
What does the PoSH command get-mailboxdatabase respond with? Usually when you
are sending db names they are server\db like oregonmail1\a_standardusers
-troy
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 7:44 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:14 AM
To: MS
for all of
the other ones I've created after that.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+
-Original Message-
From: Troy
(352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Default database name
Yeah you need
Kevin,
I may be incorrect, but I believe I read somewhere that internal SMTP is
encrypted with TLS using internal certs even on machines that have public certs
installed. We also have a somewhat similar setup to the one you speak about
and I was confused when we started getting eventlog
Joe,
If you select the option in ADUC that 'Manager can update membership list' on
the group object then that selected group manager should have no issues
adding/removing folks from within Outlook using the GAL.
We do it here all the time.
-Troy
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton
Do you mean the contacts from a specific mailbox or the whole mailbox?
If you mean simply having the whole mailbox kicked to PST, it depends how you
define your group.
Say you wanted to grab all mailboxes from an ou?
Get-mailbox -organizationalunit testou | export-mailbox -pstfolderpath
That
databases, and export the contacts
folders to their respective PST files.
Can you pipe the commands;
Get-User John | Jill | Tom | export-mailbox -pstfolderpath -includefolders
contacts
Thanks,
Bob
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Troy Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean
D,
Option Two (creating a new store) will be faster and just as efficient at
reclaiming whitespace as a defrag. I don't ever run mail store defrags
anymore, they just take forever.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Durf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 5:37 AM
Evan,
You need to create an outlook profile using that username and login as that
user to setup the rules. Then create rules that are server-side rather than
client-side.
http://www.slipstick.net/rules/serverbased.htm
We do this all the time on user and resource mailboxes.
-troy
You don't have to use CDR notation when listing IP ranges. You can input
10.1.1.1-10.255.255.255 and that would work as well.
If your DMZ is up to snuff and you allow anonymous smtp, you still risk
internal exploits from desktop users utilizing you as a relay (some risk
involved, but easy to
I agree with Simon (as will most of the other Exch admins here) that if you can
just move the mailboxes to a different mailstore, its not worth doing the
offline defrag. You get essentially the same result when you are able to
delete the original mailstore.
Your speed symptoms sound strange,
Ehren,
Using get-help *web* | fl name - returns:
Name : Test-OutlookWebServices
Name : Test-WebServicesConnectivity
Name : New-WebServicesVirtualDirectory
Name : Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory
Name : Set-WebServicesVirtualDirectory
Name : Remove-WebServicesVirtualDirectory
I am guessing
I am curious how this works..
Technically there is no account on the laptop, just cached credentials and
since the domain can't be reached, no lockout has been reported. Jim said that
GPO can give an unlock period, but I would be surprised if there wasn't a
default time period for this.
I
disconnected from the domain.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Laptop Login
I am curious how this works..
Technically there is no account on the laptop, just cached
Hey Guys and Gals,
Can you set your BBs to default to the company GAL rather than the personal
contacts for email address lookups? I have searched a bit, but have been unable
to track down the setting.
BES (latest MR) with Exchange 2007 sp1
-troy
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam
it automagically.
Type in a person's first name (or last name) then click lookup. A
list will show.
Bob Fronk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Troy Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blackberry GAL use
Hey
Wireless Handheld
- Original Message -
From: Troy Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Fri Oct 10 09:48:08 2008
Subject: RE: Blackberry GAL use
Unfortunately the default is to look in the local contacts first, and that is
what
if
same name.
-
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
- Original Message -
From: Troy Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Fri Oct 10 10:43:26 2008
Subject: RE: Blackberry GAL use
Clearly
Are you restricting relaying via IP?
What are the results of a simple telnet session from the WSUS server to the
SMTP server?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123686(EXCHG.80).aspx
-Original Message-
From: Phil Marcum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06,
My favorite outlook setting:
Actions menu - junk email - junk email settings. On the safe senders tab
automatically add people I email to the safe senders list.
Ok it isn't my favorite, but close.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
What is your Exchange version? (that applies to section looks mighty old).
We have 100s of folks on VPN and Outlook Anywhere with no issues, but we are
Exchange 2007 sp1
-troy
-Original Message-
From: James Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 9:41 AM
To:
+1 use owa or make sure you are using a Outlook 2007 client.
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.
What about via OWA or
NO,
If you had to install a certificate to your mobile devices (most don’t, but
those darn early Verizon Qs), you probably installed the certificate authority
as trusted, not the certificate itself.
So if you renew from the same CA, you should require no additional work on the
mobile devices
Do you have an unmounted mail store?
We had this issue where I created some stores and didn't mount them because
there was anything in them yet. Our netbackup SW then failed to back them up
because they weren't mounted and although it grabbed all the data from our
other stores it couldn't
So I am surprised no one actually answered this question.
Using WM phones can be just as secure (if not more) than Blackberries, since WM
data isn't forced to hit a Canadian server en route to the phone. (Our org runs
both, we run BES, I like it. I am just trying to answer the question posed).
First, co-existence should be no issue. We had some silly telephony stuff that
forced us to keep an Exchange 2000 server around for a lot longer than we
planned (its still here). It hums along with two user accounts on it and
everything else is 2007.
As for your infrastructure, let me see if
Joe,
I don't run 2K3 anymore, but isn't the option accept from the following users
OR From Everyone?
But yes, that will solve your issue if you setup the group to accept only from
authenticated users.
-troy
-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that the reason you script provisioning?
Set permissions, policy, location? If you have a default password scheme would
a script do this faster and easier than the GUI?
Not to mention as Rob said, every minute you put into learning powershell can
be used
Sure, but the issue is keeping them from adding the permissions back.
So by default domain admin shouldn't have full access to all mailboxes, script
the removal of all domain admins from mailbox perms and then create a mailbox
admin group and add the folks that should have access. Then add that
You are correct.
You lose something cool, exchange management in ADUC.
You gain something better, powershell and the ability to easily script
EVERYTHING in exchange, especially user management and creation.
Find a good book, I think most folks will agree the Payette and Jones books are
among
So IRM is designed for internal organizational usage, but can be tweaked for
external users. This makes sense because IRM/WRM is certificate/trust based
and how can you verify external users are who they allege? You could create
local exchange accounts for those users and have then use your
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
