Creating root device
Mounting root filesystem
EXT2-fs: ide0(3,7): couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (4).
mount: error 22 mounting ext2 flags Mounted devfs on /dev
Freeing unused kernel memory: 136k freed
Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel
What doe
OK, let's go safe first. Before doing ANYTHING more make a partition
table copy just in case it gets even worse:
1) Boot a linux (for example th rescue cd you have).
2) Insert a spare floppy disk
3) (As root) dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/fd0 bs=512 count=64
Fine, so you have now a copy of your hardd
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 02:43, antonio rodriguez wrote:
> Dear Ted,
>
> Yes it gives more information than gpart, and most of all, it recognizes
> my linux partitions, with all my dear data within. Now the problem is
> how to resize the partitions and how to boot again the system. Lilo
> works OK, t
duplicated.
Cheers,
Antonio
- Original Message -
From: "Ted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] kernel panic after defrag in WinjMe
> On Tuesday 25 February 2003 06:49 am, tarvid wrote:
>
&g
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 06:49 am, tarvid wrote:
> gpart rescued one customer after a viral infection had messed up
> partitions.
You can also try testdisk:
http://www.cgsecurity.org/index.html?testdisk.html
For me, it was able to rescue partitions that gpart could not.
Want to buy your P
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:17 am, flacycads wrote:
> This is a good example of the wisdom of having a separate /home partition.
> Rescues, and if need be, reinstalls are then essentially painless. I've
> forgotten exacly how 8.1 cd1 installs, but did you try booting from a linux
> floppy boot d
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 04:46 am, antonio rodriguez wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have Mandrake Linux 8.1 installed on a Duron sharing the hard disk
> with WinMe. After defrag WinMe I found that I couldn't boot Linux
> because of a kernel panic. Entering in rescue mode I've ran fdisk so my
> new par
i am sure most of us have been told to back up their partition tables - now we
know why
sanity requires that you grab all the data you can before proceeding
after that you may be able to fix the existing table without formatting
you may need to supply the correct geometry, disk drives lie about
Dear All,
I've downloaded and run gpart, but I'm not getting the results I
expected. By the moment lilo works. I've enterede in rescue mode with
cd1. So I'm able to work in rescue mode, but gpart gives to me:
*Waarning partition (Extended DOS, LBA) ends beyond disk end,.
Number of inconsistencies
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:17 am, flacycads wrote:
> This is a good example of the wisdom of having a separate /home partition.
> Rescues, and if need be, reinstalls are then essentially painless. I've
> forgotten exacly how 8.1 cd1 installs, but did you try booting from a linux
> floppy boot d
This is a good example of the wisdom of having a separate /home partition.
Rescues, and if need be, reinstalls are then essentially painless. I've
forgotten exacly how 8.1 cd1 installs, but did you try booting from a linux
floppy boot disk, and trying to run lilo lilo? Perhaps that might work.
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 05:44 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> go to freshmeat grab gparted put it on a floppy and let it try and
> "rediscover" your partitions again. Then replace your winME with 2000
> *grin*..
>
> James
>
gpart rescued one customer after a viral infection had messed up par
go to freshmeat grab gparted put it on a floppy and let it try and
"rediscover" your partitions again. Then replace your winME with 2000
*grin*..
James
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 01:46, antonio rodriguez wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have Mandrake Linux 8.1 installed on a Duron sharing the hard disk
Dear All,
I have Mandrake Linux 8.1 installed on a Duron sharing the hard disk
with WinMe. After defrag WinMe I found that I couldn't boot Linux
because of a kernel panic. Entering in rescue mode I've ran fdisk so my
new partition table has only two sections:
/dev/hda1/Win95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 02:04 pm, Tru64 User wrote:
> All i added was lkcd support to new kernel, otherwise
> it should be exactly same as original, right?
If you copy /boot/config to /usr/src/linux/.config instead of from configs to
.configs l
Hi Richard,
You might try to check all of the symlinks in /boot and rebuilding the image
with `mkinitrd /boot/init-2.4.18-6mdk.img 2.4.18-6mdk`.
Jayce
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 01:04 pm, Tru64 User wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Running Mandrake 8.2 kernel 2.4.18-6mdk default
> installation.
Hi All,
Running Mandrake 8.2 kernel 2.4.18-6mdk default
installation.
I wanted to add support for lkcd (Linux Kernel Crash
Dump), so i downloaded from kernels.org the 2.4.18
kernel.
1. Patched the kernel with lkcd patch.
2. I copied /boot/configs from current configuration
to /usr/src/linux/.con
Hi All,
Running Mandrake 8.2 kernel 2.4.18-6mdk default
installation.
I wanted to add support for lkcd (Linux Kernel Crash
Dump), so i downloaded from kernels.org the 2.4.18
kernel.
1. Patched the kernel with lkcd patch.
2. I copied /boot/configs from current configuration
to /usr/src/linux/.con
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:03, Mike Ramsey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using Mandrake Linux since version 7 and have loved all but
> one thing about it. I have yet to be able to compile a kernel on
> Mandrake. I have successfully compiled kernels on Debian, Slackware,
> Red-Hat, and various othe
Procedure that works for me on all systems (RH Slack etc)
mv .config config (getting rid of the leading . if I want to keep the
.config file.)
make mrproper.
mv config .config (getting it back)
make xconfig (or whatever you prefer)
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install
make insta
> Every time i have tried it has failed due to Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable
> to mount root fs on 16:05. In case the line above that has any
> significance it reads ds: No Socket Drivers Loaded! Some may say that
IOW, the bootable kernel you built isn't quite bootable :(.
A cursory grep in /dev and
Mike Ramsey wrote:
Hello,
I have been using Mandrake Linux since version 7 and have loved all but
one thing about it. I have yet to be able to compile a kernel on
Mandrake. I have successfully compiled kernels on Debian, Slackware,
Red-Hat, and various other systems but never successful on Mandra
Hello,
I have been using Mandrake Linux since version 7 and have loved all but
one thing about it. I have yet to be able to compile a kernel on
Mandrake. I have successfully compiled kernels on Debian, Slackware,
Red-Hat, and various other systems but never successful on Mandrake.
Every time i hav
This was to be a fresh install to replace 8.1 with 8.2 instead of trying
to upgrade it. I don't remember having any such SCSI trouble with 8.1.
I've installed 8.2 four times now on this system with no improvement in
results. Emergency rescue from CD can mount the / filesystem /dev/sda7
just fine,
While doing alot of X11 forwarding and testing VPN stuff the kernel
panics. I can reproduce it every time. Heere is the OOps:
Jul 14 21:10:00 gumnaam kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 0018
Jul 14 21:10:00 gumnaam kernel: printing eip:
Jul 14 21:10:
that was my first thought whne i first saw this - a couple of weeks ago -
i'm not sure exactly what a 'virtual address' is, but it sounds memoryish, i
ran memtest for over a day and repeated with a couple of different ram
configs, i'm limited to what i can do due to not having lots of differe
bascule wrote on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:40:08AM +0100 :
> well, after behaving for 4 days my machine went down again, i have copied the
> --begin
> watson login: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> address 0020
First and simplest thing
well, after behaving for 4 days my machine went down again, i have copied the
onscreen verbiage below, at the time i was ssh'ed in form a workstation and
running a grep process, i get very similar messages each time this machine
crashes but with a different process named, if anyone can tell fro
This problem has been solved.
The M810 board allocates part of system RAM as video RAM.
The kernel panic happens when there is not sufficient space
to load the ramdisk because some of it has been allocated
for video ram. The problem is completely solved by
giving the appropriate boot option mem=xx
We get kernel panic while trying to install LM8.2
on a pc266 m810 motherboard with an Athlon.
The same happens when trying to install RedHat 7.2.
But it does install using the 2.2.19 kernel on the
LM8.2 install CDROM.
A google search gave mixed results:
One person had a kernel panic while install
We have tried to upgrade LM 8.1 running on an
AMD Athlon XP 1500+ and a SIS5513 chipset revision 208
but we got a kernel panic here:
...
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
block: queued sectors max/low 335106kB/204034kB, 1024 slots per queue
< it happened here
RAMDISK driver
NULL pointer
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Seems that Aaron's problem is more substantial than just cardmgr.
I also started to get kernel Oops of the kind (pcmcia unrelated):
Unable to han
Hi,
Last weekend I installed the 8.2 download edition. In general I am
impressed. However, I can't install on my wife's machine until the
following shutdown issue is addressed: I get a kernel panic when
cardmgr tries to shut down.
My machine is a Sony Vaio F-340, and the card in question is a B
found a way around this, please let
me
know;
thanks.
--
Chris Haidinyak
-Original Message-From: Kursad Kayaturk
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:10
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [expert] kernel
panic after/while mounting with enterprise kernel
can you send the exact error you get?
In init doesn't even start then maybe the mount error is linux trying to
mount the initrd image and it can't.
try passing this to your kernel:
ramdisk=8192
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 12:09, Kursad Kayaturk wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have setup two thunde
Hi guys,
I
have setup two thunder k7 before with mandrake 8.1 but now I have great
problems. The problem is this time I have used a scsi
drive Fujitsu MAN3367MP but the problem is I have parity errors and linux can
not read/write with installation cdrom. When I disconnect the h
Title: kernel panic of 8.1 on Compaq Armada 1540DM
I have installed Mandrake 8.1 on my
Compaq Armada 1540DM fine but it looks
like the kernel panics after PNP BOIS
check.
The screen fills with Hex numbers. I had
problems getting the Xserver to test
the lcd screen, so I told the system
what kind of hard disk controller do you have?
i had that problem with AIC7000 HD controllers on RH.
i needed to get a driver for it at the RH site. i dont
know if you are experiencing the same thing.
--- Andreas Bergstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I attempt to install LM 8.0 on my comp
Brad Bonkoski wrote:
>
> Well, if you are trying to boot drom the install CDROM, there must be
> something wrong with the boot process of it, so you could just make some
> boot floppies from the cd, or get the proper images from the Internet
> and hope there is not other problems with the cd.
> -
When I attempt to install LM 8.0 on my computer it hangs during
the initial load of the kernel with an error message like this:
VFS error: Unable to mount root device "" or 08:05
Please set a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: Unable to mount root filesystem on 08:05
I have tried setting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elice Wu
> Sent: 10 March 2001 06:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] kernel panic, can not mount root fs
>
>
> (I'm not saying that you necessarily have to re-install, but I have no
> further sug
(I'm not saying that you necessarily have to re-install, but I have no
further suggestions as to how to recover your linux data)
There's no need to add any extra partitions between Windows and Linux
partitions. You just need to make sure that when you do your install,
that you install Windows
Of course # of primary partitions is not os-dependent. What i'm talking
about is that windows screw up 2nd, 3rd and 4th primary partitions if it
finds any.
> What are you talking about.
> Windows has nothing to do with the # of primary partitions which can be
> used.
> Any drive can contain up to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerry
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 9:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] kernel panic, can not mount root fs
>
>
>
> The problem could also
well i agree windows has screwed up your partitions,
you may be able to use partition commander to repair the damage, but as for salvaging
your data, most likely only windows data can be salvaged, im unsure how to salvage
data from linux partitions, the cause seems to be that when windows was wr
[Elice Wu]
> Sounds to me like Windows didnt recognise your partitions properly, and
> installed over the root partition of Linux.
>
> I've had this happen to me before. The only solution that I found was to
> re-install the whole lot, both OS's, making sure that windows recognised
> the partition
Sounds to me like Windows didnt recognise your partitions properly, and
installed over the root partition of Linux.
I've had this happen to me before. The only solution that I found was to
re-install the whole lot, both OS's, making sure that windows recognised
the partitions that were allocated
dear mandrake community,
i am utterly at loss with my laptop :
- prehistory : installed some new softare on my windows partition.
(yeah, yeah .. i don't want to hear about it,
but the linux version of the program
gave me a segmentation fault)
maybe the disk got a little too full the
>
>
> I can boot graphically, but NSB or Failsafe (not very 'failsafe') it gets
to something about the SWAPPER end then lines of addresses then
>
> Aieee kernel Panic
> ...
> in sync swapper not syncing
>
>
> and the computer totally locks up.
>
> Any help out there? The onl
You need to check again your kernel configuration. Everything you did
looks fine, so it is probably be an option missing in your kernel config.
I didn't see a "make oldconfig" so I am not sure if all the options you
require are available. Good Luck!
--- "David G.Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Thanks for the input. I tried it and I still can't boot with the new kernel
- `make install` created the system map & boot image in /boot.
- I removed the initrd line and made sure the image line pointed to the fresh
image
- I ran lilo just to be sure all was well
- I rebooted and got the nast
add a make install this will skip the step of you copy the stuff manually...
"David G.Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-23 03:45:55 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Scott Walker/MTL/BAM/ActiMedia)
Subject: [expert] kerne
I am attempting to upgrade my kernel from 2.2.17 to 2.4.1-pre10 and I just
can't seem to get it right! Please help!!!
-- Env --
Linux Mandrake 7.2
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 (kgcc)
ReiserFS 3.5.26 on all partitions (except swap!)
I can boot into 2.2.17 and the ReiserFS partitions mount with no pro
First, if this is the wrong list for help questions, please let me know
- I've been searching for answers to this since 10 am (it's 1:20 pm
now), and this is the last resource I can find that might offer some
help. ~,^
I've installed the Linux-Mandrake 7.2 distro (which uses kernel version
2.2.1
Check your fans are working and especially that the cpu fan is not
blocked by dust/lint. My K6-2/400 gives a few oops'es like this at the
start of summer, signalling its time for a clean. If neglected, Random
reboots occur and eventually, if the day is especially hot, it just
locks solid.
BillK
It looks like it could be bad memory, but I've never seen messages like
this before (ie I'm just guessing).
You might want to try the machine with other memory.
Buchan
Andy Abshagen wrote:
>
> OK. So everything has been going along fine until this morning. All of a
> sudden I noticed that ou
Sorry I have not played with qmial much. Check the qmail website, it
provides a vast list of information. Does you ISP news server have a qmail
group? Good luck,
Cecil
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
OK. So everything has been going along fine until this morning. All of a
sudden I noticed that our new qmail server stopped responding. I went to
the qmail server and noticed that there was a kernel panic message on the
screen and then something about tcpserver. Since the first time it seems
t
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Lyle wrote:
> I don't like to talk bad about brands, but Western Digital is one of the few
> that I discuss. Western Digital has a wonderfull warrenty and is quite easy
> to exchange bad HD's when needed. The problem is that WD hard drives have
> to be replaced more often
It's not about a decision to support, it is that WD drives often are not up
to spec
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas Justin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic on boot
09, 2000 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic on boot
Mark Weaver wrote :
> I hate to tell you this, but you very well may have a hardware conflict
> on this particular machine. It's quite possibly your hard drive. There
> are some changes in the HCL bet
I don't think it's so much that they stopped supporting 4-5 year old hardware
as it is they simply tightened up their standards a bit. It's the hardware
manufactures lack of attention to specific standards that causes problems like
this. They still support the older hardware.
Mark
Keep in
Mark Weaver wrote :
> I hate to tell you this, but you very well may have a hardware conflict
> on this particular machine. It's quite possibly your hard drive. There
> are some changes in the HCL between Mandrake 7.0 and 7.1 that you may
> want to check on at the Mandrake site. I seem to remember
Nicolas Justin wrote:
>
> Mark Weaver a écrit :
> >
> > Nicolas Justin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I installed the mdk7.1, and at the first boot I have a kernel panic:
> > > cannot mount root fs, just before init.
> > > I have this error message:
> > >
> > > EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,65
Mark Weaver a écrit :
>
> Nicolas Justin wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I installed the mdk7.1, and at the first boot I have a kernel panic:
> > cannot mount root fs, just before init.
> > I have this error message:
> >
> > EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext2_check_descriptor: Block bitmap
> > fo
Nicolas Justin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I installed the mdk7.1, and at the first boot I have a kernel panic:
> cannot mount root fs, just before init.
> I have this error message:
>
> EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext2_check_descriptor: Block bitmap
> for group X not in group (block Y)!
> EXT2-f
Hi!
I installed the mdk7.1, and at the first boot I have a kernel panic:
cannot mount root fs, just before init.
I have this error message:
EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,65)): ext2_check_descriptor: Block bitmap
for group X not in group (block Y)!
EXT2-fs: group descriptors corrupted!
(where X an
When I leave my machine for 7-8 hours, my monitor goes into power saving
and never comes back. When I looked at the log files, I saw a kernel panic!
This is the log message
Kernel panic: SUPERMOUNT panic (device 0/3): supermount_put_write_access:
filesystem not write accessed
This is the detail
When I leave my machine for 7-8 hours, my monitor goes into power saving
and never comes back. When I looked at the log files, I saw a kernel panic!
This is the log message
Kernel panic: SUPERMOUNT panic (device 0/3): supermount_put_write_access:
filesystem not write accessed
This is the detail
Are you sure you have a good root file system?
Did you try making a boot disk when installing this time?
Fin wrote:
>
> I previously ran mandrake 7 on my old PII setup with no problems.
> However, now that I've upgraded to an Athlon setup I get the following
> message when I try to install fro
I previously ran mandrake 7 on my old PII setup with no problems.
However, now that I've upgraded to an Athlon setup I get the following
message when I try to install from dos:
kernel panic:VFS:unable to mount root fs on 08:01
It won't boot from the cd and if I try to use my old boot floppy I g
Many thanks
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, root mewed:
> Vic wrote:
>
> > If you are installing a cpu into a motherboard,
> > and you don't know the voltage, is it safe to
> > start at the lowest voltage and then go up
> > from there until it works?
>
> Well, tis safer to read the info printed on the pro
Vic wrote:
> If you are installing a cpu into a motherboard,
> and you don't know the voltage, is it safe to
> start at the lowest voltage and then go up
> from there until it works?
Well, tis safer to read the info printed on the processor and search the web
site of the company making it for th
If you are installing a cpu into a motherboard,
and you don't know the voltage, is it safe to
start at the lowest voltage and then go up
from there until it works?
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Tihomir Gasparac mewed:
> Hi
>
> I would just like to share a "Kernel Panic" remedy
> with the group. It might
Tihomir Gasparac wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would just like to share a "Kernel Panic" remedy
> with the group. It might be trivial to some, but I
> think it might be useful information.
>
> The problem I had was that Linux crashed consistently
> because of "Kernel Panic", all I could do was to power
> off
Hi
I would just like to share a "Kernel Panic" remedy
with the group. It might be trivial to some, but I
think it might be useful information.
The problem I had was that Linux crashed consistently
because of "Kernel Panic", all I could do was to power
off.
This stated to happen a while after I
I've also been running OC'd systeems for a long time now. The first one is an
old 100Mhz Cyrix686 @ 120 Mhz, the other is a P200MMX @ 225Mhz and my actual
Linux system is a K6-2 350 @ 400Mhz. I've never experienced any kind of
problems with any of the systems.
El lun, 31 ene 2000, escribiste:
>
I have already tried that and I get the same thing. Everything was working fine
when I was using 6.1, NT also works fine so I don't think its that. I thought
maybe I would recompile the kernel but I cant always get the same settings back
to do that.
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, you
According to the original message he already tried your solution. As for
your comments about OC'd systems you're way off of the mark. I've run OC'd
systems for quite a while. With the proper initial testing, Intel chips
have a very good success rate. And his system is running at a STANDARD 100
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> I am using Mandrake 7.0 and have an Abit MB and two 366 celerons
> overclocked to 550. When I install mandrake everything goes good. When I
> use the Linux config. from LILO it crashes with a kernel panic. When I use
> the Linux-up config it runs fine. I have trie
I am using Mandrake 7.0 and have an Abit MB and two 366 celerons
overclocked to 550. When I install mandrake everything goes good. When I
use the Linux config. from LILO it crashes with a kernel panic. When I use
the Linux-up config it runs fine. I have tried without having the cerlerons
overclock
(system info: Mandrake 6.0, kernel 2.2.12, i686 200MHz, 128M RAM, all
SCSI)
Friday am my system became completely hung requiring me to hit the reset
button. Unfortunately I was the cause - killed the pid for X instead of
Netscape. Anyway, once the machine came backup I logged in and started X.
I
What I meant was to say Yes to second extended fs support.
Cheers
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: Sridhar G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 1999 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic cant find hd
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Di
Hi Aaron,
Did U happen to say Yes to "second extended fs support" under filesystem
menu, that may also be the problem.
Cheers
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: Aaron W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 1999 7:57 AM
Subject:
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>I did move the kernel, I used bzImage named it /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.12,
> made a new initrd with /sbin/mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.2.12.img 2.2.12, added
> it to lilo (keeping my old one 2.2.9-27mdk), ran /sbin/lilo, it added them
> fine. I did not move the system.map
>On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, you wrote:
>> After compiling a new kernel (2.2.12 from kernel.org) on reboot I get an
>> error that the root file system can not be found. It looks like it can not
>> find anything on my hd not just the root filesystem. When it is booting it
>> lists all my ide devices and s
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> After compiling a new kernel (2.2.12 from kernel.org) on reboot I get an
> error that the root file system can not be found. It looks like it can not
> find anything on my hd not just the root filesystem. When it is booting it
> lists all my ide devices and says s
After compiling a new kernel (2.2.12 from kernel.org) on reboot I get an
error that the root file system can not be found. It looks like it can not
find anything on my hd not just the root filesystem. When it is booting it
lists all my ide devices and says something on the line with my hd about
- Original Message -
From: Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 30, 1999 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic???
> Sridhar G wrote:
>
> > "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c."
>
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I compiled kernel source 2.2.9-27mdk and installed it. While boot up I get
> > the error message
> >
> > "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c."
> >
> > What is the reason for this and what do the numbers m
Sridhar G wrote:
> "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c."
03:0c is hda12. Is that where you compiled the new kernel for?
Are you booting from a compiler output floppy? If so, you may have
not compiled to floppy (must be make bzdisk) but are using a floppy
from a previous
Yes, Changed lilo.conf and ran lilo -v. Anyway what do those numbers mean.
Cheers
Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 1999 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Kernel panic???
> On Sun, 29 Aug
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I compiled kernel source 2.2.9-27mdk and installed it. While boot up I get
> the error message
>
> "Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c."
>
> What is the reason for this and what do the numbers mean.
>
>
Did you change lilo.conf a
Hi all,
I compiled kernel source 2.2.9-27mdk and installed it. While boot up I get
the error message
"Kernel panic : VFS : Unable to mount root fs on 03:0c."
What is the reason for this and what do the numbers mean.
Any help
Thanks
Sridhar
94 matches
Mail list logo
