It is the tradition in western civilization as influenced by the Greek and
Judeo-Christian culture to use human rational thought to prove truths in
philosophy and thinking. It is a way or another way to describe "bliss" or
pure consciousness in vedic thought.
It was part of Osho's
Thx, whether speculation or not, his assertion is that there is no "Creator"
God who creates the universe and who is an all-powerful Personality like the
Christian Yahweh or like Krishna.
Then, he goes on to say that in his opinion, one should do away with the the
term "God", since it implies
Osho was speculating. He really did not know what he was saying. But can he
return back from the dead and tell his disciples that he was right?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
4 min lecture by OSHO: "There is no God"
Trump wins, Hillary steals?
HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS GRIM. BIBLE CODE REVEALS MORE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM
HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM SO YOU
Well, I guess using his method, one find almost anything
one wants??
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:29 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Senator Rubio: If God Wants the Climate to Change,
We Must Let It
I can't find any other newsource that quotes him
The answer lies on the website, itself:
http://www.newslo.com/about-us/ http://www.newslo.com/about-us/
JUST ENOUGH NEWS…Newslo is the first hybrid News/Satire platform on the web.
Readers come to us for a unique brand of entertainment and information that is
enhanced by features like
with alternative energy
technologies, and will reap the economic advantage.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:05 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Senator Rubio: If God Wants the Climate
I can't find any other newsource that quotes him saying things quite that
extreme about God and Jesus and coimate change.
THis feels more like something The Onion might write, but you never know.
L
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :
Senator Rubio: If God Wants
Like trying to find a needle in a haystack, with a bulldozer. Oh well, I
suppose it at least gets the silly scientists thinking about God. May they
stumble on!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
That's one of the questions posed by this excellent article from
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
That's one of the questions posed by this excellent article from Salon.com.
Heaven is for neuroscience: How the brain creates visions of God
hey turq and Ann, yes, this is a wonderful article, if a bit biased. I like the
point at the end that only Joan of Arc could of rallied the French. And it
seems that Dostoevsky still could write acclimed novels which probably have
enriched the lives of some people. So...regardless of the
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
hey turq and Ann, yes, this is a wonderful article, if a bit biased. I like
the point at the end that only Joan of Arc could of rallied the French. And it
seems that Dostoevsky still could write acclimed novels which probably
From: awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
hey turq and Ann, yes, this is a wonderful article, if a bit biased. I like the
point at the end that only Joan of Arc could of rallied the French. And it
Barry just hates it when people laugh at his button-pushing attempts. That's
why he snipped this from his quote of Ann's post:
He was posting this to imply that visionaries or those who have had spiritual
or revelatory experiences were most likely diseased in some way. I wonder if he
was
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
hey turq and Ann, yes, this is a wonderful article, if a bit biased. I like
the point at the
Why would you believe watermelon?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCL4dXUtblg
That was terrific. Thanks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCL4dXUtblg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
I found this paragraph interesting, if not creative.
I am not sure about this. For one thing, don't Christians take their
Jesus to be equal
in spirituality mode, I agree with you! Reading Yogananda
can be very sweet, uplifting, and convincing.
From: Susan wayback71@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:46 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Jesus = to God
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Susan wayback71@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
I found this paragraph interesting, if not creative.
I am not sure
Hm.when you are not in your believing in spirituality mode, what do
you think?
From: Susan waybac...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:08 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Jesus = to God
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Jesus = to God
Â
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@ wrote:
snip
I think Yogananda wrote some long translations and commentary of the Gita
from a Christian perspective, explaining the similarities between
Hinduism/Gita and Christianity
wayback71@
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:46 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Jesus = to God
Â
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn emilymae.reyn@
wrote:
I found this paragraph interesting, if not creative. Â
I am
Thank you Susan and Laughinggull. I appreciate it.
From: laughinggull108 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:17 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Jesus = to God
--- In FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
snip
The sentence 'For since the self is the individuating existence
of a nature, God's presence, which is existence itself, can hold
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@ wrote:
snip
The sentence 'For since the self is the individuating existence
of a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
Be yourself. Seems kinda obvious, huh?
From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 11:31 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Your free will, God, and grace: the person in
action
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
Aspirin is good for headaches. It really does work. But if you like to suffer,
there are ineffective things you can take for a headache.
Robin likes really convoluted intellectual stuff with strong emotional
overtones. I prefer more simplicity. There is what is called 'you', a body, and
there
with you (-:
PS Still working on my naughty name...
From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:31 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Your free will, God, and grace: the person in
action
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
Aspirin is good for headaches. It really does work. But if you like to
suffer, there are ineffective things you can take for a headache.
Robin likes really convoluted intellectual stuff with strong
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:31 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Your free will, God, and grace: the person in
action
Â
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
and
simply imagine that the Seine is flowing by and Camus and Sartre are at the
table with you (-:
PS Still working on my naughty name...
From: awoelflebater no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:31 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Your free
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@ wrote:
I thought you had left Catholic philosophy behind Robin. But then you seem to
be bent on destroying the oneness of God in your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@ wrote:
I thought you had left Catholic philosophy behind Robin. But then you seem to
be bent on destroying the oneness of God in your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@ wrote:
I thought you had left Catholic philosophy behind Robin. But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius
anartaxius@... wrote:
snip
The sentence 'For since the self is the individuating existence
of a nature, God's presence, which is existence itself, can hold
that self *at its highest quivering stress without absorbing it'
seems to
Well, I guess I will never be an editor.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@
wrote:
snip
The sentence 'For since the self is the individuating existence
of a nature, God's presence,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@... wrote:
I thought you had left Catholic philosophy behind Robin. But then you seem to
be bent on destroying the oneness of God in your experience. This is needlessly
complex, but it is quite intriguing. Hopkins, or a commentator
.
From: Robin Carlsen maskedze...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Happiness is seeing God
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@... wrote:
Let's take a guess: it's that jolly old
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@... wrote:
Let's take a guess: it's that jolly old medieval saint, Aquinas!
Congratulations you are our winner! You have correctly identified the author of
the piece.
Your prize is: 1.one gallon Lourdes Water
I didn't win but I would love a signed copy of Brideshead Revisited.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Let's take a guess: it's that jolly old medieval saint, Aquinas!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
[ Those of you who already are God, please excuse my
use of the hypothetical in posing this question. ]
Would You rather sit down over a cold brew with a guy
or gal who could look at You and Your Creation and
laugh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote:
[ Those of you who already are God, please excuse my
use of the hypothetical in posing this question. ]
Would You rather sit down over a cold brew with a guy
or gal who could look at You and Your Creation and
laugh at
, maskedzebra no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Re: [FairfieldLife] For you Robin - God can only be experienced as
first-person ontology
Dear Ravi,
You are so different from me, from all the rest of the persons who post here
at FFL, that I hesitate to go beyond what I have already said
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:43:21 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For you Robin - God can only be experienced as
first-person ontology
Dear Robin,
OK fine, if there was anyone who could have stopped The Mad Yogi Inc it would
have had to be either you, Bob or Judy. All of you
Re: [FairfieldLife] For you Robin - God can only be experienced as first-person
ontology
Dear Ravi,
You are so different from me, from all the rest of the persons who post here at
FFL, that I hesitate to go beyond what I have already said to you in that
personal analysis. Because there I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj9t94fuUTg
From: maskedzebra no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 10:36:55 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For you Robin - God can only be experienced as
first-person
I've never seen such partisan and one sided posting as
from this particular poster, it is as if he can only
see black and white or is so jaded in his way of
thinking that objective thinking is no longer possible.
Yes do.rflex is a big idiot - it was probably not wise of
political point of
view and he's in for a big let down next year.
From: Ravi Yogi raviy...@att.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 5, 2011 1:35:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does Rick Perry's God have something against Texas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@... wrote:
I've never seen such partisan and one sided posting as from this
particular poster, it is as if he can only see black and white or is so
jaded in his way of thinking that objective thinking is no longer
possible.
Yes do.rflex is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@ wrote:
I've never seen such partisan and one sided posting as from this
particular poster, it is as if he can only see black and white or is so
jaded in his way of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi raviyogi@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@ wrote:
I've never seen such partisan and one sided posting as
from this particular poster, it is
do.rflex:
Why does God hate Texas?
So, it seems that you hate a lot of different groups
of people, for no apparent reason.
Prejudice against certain group is always wrong, John.
You've been taken to task for this on several
occasions. You seem to be trying to outdo yourself.
Don't you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:
It is prophesied that a leader shall come out of the desert where the fire
and
heat shall temper his power! Can I get an Amen on that!
Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardjwilliamstexas willytex@...
wrote:
do.rflex:
Why does God hate Texas?
So, it seems that you hate a lot of different groups
of people, for no apparent reason.
Prejudice against certain group is always wrong, John.
You've been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote:
It is prophesied that a leader shall come out of the desert where the fire
and
heat shall temper his power! Can I get an Amen on that!
Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, richardjwilliamstexas willytex@
wrote:
do.rflex:
Why does God hate Texas?
So, it seems that you hate a lot of different groups
of people, for no apparent reason.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:
Like I said, if somebody (say any Krishna Bhaktis of various stripes - the
Hare Krishna Guru, Swami Prakashanand, the fellow below...etc) claims Krishna
is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, apart from Scriptures, what's the
Dear yifuxero piece of shit - your nightmare is coming true the Hare Krishnas
are coming after you, you can run or hide but they will surely make you
Krishna's bitch. Say goodbye to all your stupid posts with links from Google
images.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@...
Is your real name Matlock?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:
Nope...I'm familiar with the tricks of these devious Krishna Bhaktis.
They state outright (privately), that any tricks whatsoever are
legitimate, as long as it results in somebody saying Krishna. Take a
Your obvious anger and open hostility toward Bhaktis tell much more than
anything else about your point of view here, Yifu.
It isn't only the Hare Krishnas [whom you apparently despise] that look to
'enlightenment' in terms of a personal relationship with God. Guru Dev's
discourses are
Ravi, I am indeed blessed to be targeted by you, and am now in a select group.
Keep up the good work...I have seen you evolve quite a bit since your first
posts speaking in the 3-rd person and the like.
You seem to be getting smoother... and more settled down, as to your energy
field; although
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHh9ywmo5AE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHh9ywmo5AE
Yifu, this is the category you fall into by diminishing the adherents of
Bhagawan.
(yea, I know I've posted this before, but it is such a classic)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@...
Don't let yourself be conned by these Krishna Bhaktis. Krishna is not the
Supreme Personality of Godhead. There is no such Personality, and the burden
of proof apart from merely quoting Scriptures is on the claimants. Anybody
however, is free to set up a dualist, loving relationship with one of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:
Don't let yourself be conned by these Krishna Bhaktis. Krishna is not the
Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Nowhere in the interview was that claimed.
There is no such Personality, and the burden of proof apart from merely
Like I said, if somebody (say any Krishna Bhaktis of various stripes - the Hare
Krishna Guru, Swami Prakashanand, the fellow below...etc) claims Krishna is the
Supreme Personality of Godhead, apart from Scriptures, what's the evidence?
The Guru below appears to be more liberal than the Fundie
Radhanath Swami holds a position on the ISKCON GBC the governing
board of the Hari K's.
While what he opines is somewhat less doctrinaire than other members, in
truth he can still only spout ISKCON`s brand of Gaudiya theology.
His responses are comparable to someone at a high level in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Yifu yifuxero@... wrote:
Like I said, if somebody (say any Krishna Bhaktis of various stripes - the
Hare Krishna Guru, Swami Prakashanand, the fellow below...etc) claims Krishna
is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, apart from Scriptures, what's the
Nope...I'm familiar with the tricks of these devious Krishna Bhaktis. They
state outright (privately), that any tricks whatsoever are legitimate, as long
as it results in somebody saying Krishna. Take a look at what he's doing
pursuant to the previous efforts of the Hare Krishna Guru.
...
The
The Unified Field. Yep, this is interesting. Looks like Maharishi was an old
Baptist. Different from modern Southern Baptist doctrine this is what the
Primitive Baptists think.1964, that's fabulous.
That 'Free Grace', it's there. Everyone is saved already, it is only a matter
of
Yep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:
The Grace of God.
image.jpeg
The Grace of God
29 December 1964, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi speaking to a course at Bad
Mergentheim, Germany
Question: How do we make the grace of God come to us?
...what I have been calling lying is indeed pragyaparadh, the mistake of the
intellect! It is that part of us that most furiously desires to be *right* --
and yet can never be right while it is trapped in spacetime.
Hi Rory - I don't get this. Can you give an example please? What is the
RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote:
...what I have been calling lying is indeed pragyaparadh, the mistake of
the intellect! It is that part of us that most furiously desires to be
*right* -- and yet can never be right while it is trapped in spacetime.
whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
Hi Rory - I
Oh OK - got it. Finding false fulfillment in the manipulation of external
events to fix the problem, instead of finding a more permanent solution
within. This Buddhist monk (Tsetan somebody) was talking about that on one of
the BATGAP interviews, and how with the addition of love, anger and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
Oh OK - got it. Finding false fulfillment in the manipulation of external
events to fix the problem, instead of finding a more permanent solution
within.
Couldn't it be, instead of an 'either or' and 'as well as'? As
Right, I was asking in this case for an example of the pragyaparadh thingie -
'mistake of the intellect', which is somewhat abstract wrt everyday life. I
understand it better as a principle or dynamic of life vs. a blueprint for how
to act or think.
I wouldn't advocate if I were hungry to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
Right, I was asking in this case for an example of the pragyaparadh thingie
- 'mistake of the intellect',
Coincidence, I was just looking up, googling the sankrit term, as I had
forgotten it, and came across some
On Feb 4, 2011, at 6:22 PM, blusc0ut wrote:
a *superimpostion*. (Did anyone ever hear this word by a neo-advaita teacher?)
Yes, but it is rather rare.
It's usually from Neo-A's who had actual advaita vedanta gurusst...
Pretty funny how the Sankrit word Aropa (a-ROPE-uh) is so close to the
Interesting - I like both of those definitions, although they both involve
conscious action on the part of the doer.
I was seeing pragnyaparadh as one of those Gee I never thought of that type
of things, unconscious behavior to blame the 'outside'. A truer mistake, if you
will, than
Its like maya in vedanta, which makes the stick
appear to be a snake, an overlay over reality,
a *superimpostion*. (Did anyone ever hear this
word by a neo-advaita teacher?)
Vaj:
Yes, but it is rather rare.
Just about everyone on the planet, whether 'neo' or
not, knows that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
Oh OK - got it. Finding false fulfillment in the manipulation of external
events to fix the problem, instead of finding a more permanent solution
within. This Buddhist monk (Tsetan somebody) was talking about that on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
When Rory says we are lying about Reality, is this his way of explaining
pragyaparadh, the mistake of the intellect or is he framing it as lying
http://www.fantasygallery.net/roberts/art_8_mynewpal.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
When Rory says
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:
Rory, I am enjoying these dialogues of you and Jim and others a lot. My
experience too. I find it fun to have someone else put words to it in a way
that I may not be verbal. It is a fun stabilization as this goes along.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote:
When Rory says we are lying about Reality, is this his way of explaining
pragyaparadh, the mistake of the intellect or is he framing it as lying
to persuade us that he understands better than anyone why people suffer?
http://www.startlingart.com/Viewer.asp?ImageSource=fine_artFileName=BeCarefullWhatyouAskFor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
When Rory says we are lying about Reality, is this his way
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
OK, everybody, I give up! Having already flooded the web with 28 posts, I am
going to try to sum up in this one. First, my apologies, Judy, in coming off
as hostile and angry to you. I certainly am no stranger to those
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote:
snip
* * * Judy is correct; it is not possible for anyone to
counteract the will of God, from Our point of view at
any rate. However, it is entirely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote:
snip
* * * Judy is correct; it is not possible for anyone to
counteract the will of God,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
If I don't know the truth experientially--if my experiential
reality is of separateness--then you simply cannot legitimately
call it a lie. I'm telling the truth about my experiential
reality.
* * * Yes! Separateness is an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
If I don't know the truth experientially--if my experiential
reality is of separateness--then you simply cannot legitimately
call it a lie. I'm telling the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
I disagree. That isn't a lie either, subtle or otherwise.
As I said before, it may be a *mistake*, it may be a
mistake that causes suffering, but it isn't a lie.
In fact, what *would* be a lie would be if I said, Oh,
well,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
I disagree. That isn't a lie either, subtle or otherwise.
As I said before, it may be a *mistake*, it may be a
mistake that causes suffering, but it
Rory wrote: OK. Perfection aside, how about the thought, It must
be OK for this terrible suffering to BE, because it IS in
this moment?
authfriend jstein@... wrote:
That would be an utterly irrelevant thought for me. The
relevant thought would be, This terrible suffering should
not
To me this is one of those discussions which IMHO can't actually be
resolved.People who are awake' will experience reality ,whatever the hell
that is :), as non dual, people who are notawake will experience reality as
separate from the self, I think the mistake
is thinking that one state is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shanti2218411 kc21d@... wrote:
To me this is one of those discussions which IMHO can't actually be
resolved.People who are awake' will experience reality ,whatever the hell
that is :), as non dual, people who are notawake will experience reality as
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo