--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
I think the distinction was implicit in what Curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
No, see, the black here is to do it
*cluelessly*, the way Angela does it--
and the way you do it as well. Both of
you are so convinced of your own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
Like conveniently forgetting that my remarks about buildings falling were made
in the context of an article by a physicist?
- Original Message
From: authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 9:01:38 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
From Larry Domash-(Attn: Judy)
Behind these rules of
neurophysiological specificity there lies a rich and fascinating
theory of the mantras and their application; *to date Maharishi
has not published his interpretation of this theory*, although he
has indicated a desire to do so.
MMY still
That's 47, BTW.
Jesus, Barry. Counting Judy's posts?
Will you ever grow up?
Another perfectly good discussion topic
hijacked. Why don't you just tell us where
the TM mantras come from? What's the big
secret?
Fifty years obsfuscation and conning the
poor students - this is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
ruthsimplicity@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
steve.sundur@ wrote:
[I wrote:]
I wish Lawson were still here.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 9:42 PM, tertonzeno wrote:
---It's the power in the mantra that's essential; and not present to
the same degree in mantras of other traditions I've been intiated
into.
I've had the opposite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We may not be using the term hypnosis the same
way, that's true. It's the element of suggestion
that I don't find consistent with TM, just on its
face.
I agree with this.
I'm not sure I do. The intro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
Not everyone thought his comments were unsubstantial.
I found many of them extremely meaty. He has an almost
Zenlike
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
Not everyone thought his comments were unsubstantial.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Yeah, well, if it's your POV that TM is hypnosis,
like I said, forget it, whether you're pitching
it or not. Our understandings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Yeah, well, if it's your POV that TM is hypnosis,
like
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:11 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
(I started
posting here in May 2005, as did a few others who had
been regulars on alt.m.t, including Lawson, who dropped
out this past summer because he felt unappreciated.)
Translation: people didn’t appreciate the fact that he ignored
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
]On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:29 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
When I got my mantras
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
We may not be using the term hypnosis the same
way, that's true. It's the element of suggestion
that I don't find consistent with TM, just on its
face.
What don't you find suggestive about sit easily?
--- do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Yeah, well, if it's your POV that TM is
hypnosis,
like I said, forget it, whether
On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Peter wrote:
By the way, being trained to teach TM and hypnosis and
having experienced both here's my take: TM and
hypnosis are initially identical
Exactly. Sad thing is, some people get stuck on that initial phase and
never move beyond. When they go to a form
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
By the way, being trained to teach TM and hypnosis and
having experienced both here's my take: TM and
hypnosis are initially identical. The difference with
TM though is the continued quieting of the mind's
activity and
Exactly. Sad thing is, some people get stuck on that initial phase and
never move beyond. When they go to a form of deep meditation, they're
often shocked at how 'the bottom drops out' of their 'transcendent'.
Usually after that they realize they were simply languishing in a
light, blissy trance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
I don't even think Lawson was even meditating at the time, but
he was really into the TM preacher thang.
That's kinda where Lawson fell a
Brilliant.
- Original Message
From: Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 7:37:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
We may not be using
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I don't even think Lawson was even meditating at the time, but he was
really into the TM preacher thang.
That's kinda where Lawson fell a little short in the credibililty dept.
He was Mr. Positive Benefits of TM, Mr.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
ruthsimplicity@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ruth, please read what I wrote again. Whether
hypnosis can be ruled out by common sense depends
on how one understands TM. In my understanding,
it's a matter of common sense. If it isn't in
Curtis's understanding, then
Curtis, with all due respect, you said: ...I don't know enough about
either state to make clear distinctions. I can't even clearly define
hypnosis or meditative state Judy.
That appears to be a clear contradiction to what you just said above
it. But nevertheless, you seem to be OK with
Thanks for the information Stu.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Stu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I've been doing some meditation lately. I am experimenting with not
using the mantra. In past
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis, with all due respect, you said: ...I don't know enough about
either state to make clear distinctions. I can't even clearly define
hypnosis or meditative state Judy.
That appears to be a clear
Note that we have here two more examples of
Barry's continuing obsession with the number
of my posts.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that we have here two more examples of
Barry's continuing obsession with the number
of my posts.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brilliant.
Not. Non sequitur, in fact.
From: Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
We may not be using the term hypnosis the same
way, that's true. It's the element of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Ruth, please read what I wrote again. Whether
hypnosis can be ruled out by common sense depends
on how one understands TM. In my understanding,
populations or manipulate them all
kinds of ways.
But who (ultimately {if there is an ultimate}) is the manipulator?
- Original Message
From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 2:17:50 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re
That's why I trust it implicitly.
- Original Message
From: authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:02:59 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
We may not be using the term hypnosis the same
way, that's true. It's the element of suggestion
that I don't find consistent with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Brilliant.
Not. Non sequitur, in fact.
From: Vaj vajranatha@
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
We may not be
]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:23:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, lurkernomore200020 00
steve.sundur@ ... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote
There's only one Sri Yantra, Bharat2, associated
with the Sri Vidya sect, and that is the Sri Chakra.
Bhairatu wrote:
My point was that many yantras have bij mantras on them
so you can't claim that Sri Yantra is the source.
There is only ONE Sri Yantra associated with the Sri
Vidya
: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:53:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
Note that we have here two more examples of
Barry's continuing obsession with the number
of my posts.
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] . wrote
From: curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:16:05 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
Curtis, with all due respect, you said: ...I don't know enough about
either state to make
Judy (snipped): not in fact
Me (all butt): but in spirit.
- Original Message
From: authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:33:21 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife
PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:27:45 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
Exactly. Sad thing is, some people get stuck on that initial phase
and
never move beyond. When they go to a form of deep meditation
, January 20, 2008 10:26:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Brilliant.
Not. Non
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Brilliant.
Not. Non sequitur, in fact.
From: Vaj
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 7:34 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
Actually when I went to Devi Bhava there were only about 50 of us. Very
intimate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly do. That's why Vaj's question was a non
sequitur; it's not a point of contention.
Key words: Before they start meditating.
As I said to Peter, you can't suggest something
(a) that you can't describe
Judy wrote:
This discussion was about *whether* he had said
anything about the origin of the technique.
Actually I think the discussion was about the origin
of the TM mantras. It's obvious from the discussion
that some TM teachers didn't have a clue about this.
What is amazing is that here we
11:29:24 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly do. That's why Vaj's question was a non
sequitur; it's not a point of contention.
Key words: Before
On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
]On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 7:34 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
Actually when I went
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:29 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
OK. I was getting the impression that there was a disagreement on the
use of suggestions because there was not a clear distinction made
between getting ready to meditate and meditating. It looks like Vaj
and Angela had the same impression as
Richard J. Williams wrote:
There's only one Sri Yantra, Bharat2, associated
with the Sri Vidya sect, and that is the Sri Chakra.
Bhairatu wrote:
My point was that many yantras have bij mantras on them
so you can't claim that Sri Yantra is the source.
There is only ONE
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
Not everyone thought
---This historical background is quite fascinating, but limited in
relavance as I see the situation. For example, I haven't found any
good techniques associated with the Sri Yantra. There's the Sri
Vidya mantra which I have chanted (and discarded in favor of others),
and the Lalita
On Jan 20, 2008, at 4:22 PM, tertonzeno wrote:
---This historical background is quite fascinating, but limited in
relavance as I see the situation. For example, I haven't found any
good techniques associated with the Sri Yantra. There's the Sri
Vidya mantra which I have chanted (and discarded
tertonzeno wrote:
---This historical background is quite fascinating, but
limited in relavance as I see the situation. For example,
I haven't found any good techniques associated with the
Sri Yantra. There's the Sri Vidya mantra which I have
chanted (and discarded in favor of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the distinction was implicit in what Curtisdeltablues
said, but Judy missed it. Now that she understands it, I think
we're all pretty much in agreement.
Angela. Every single time you venture to
suss out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
I think the distinction was implicit in what Curtisdeltablues
said, but Judy missed it. Now that she understands it, I think
we're all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Richard J. Williams wrote:
Billy wrote:
It appears MMY will be going to the grave without revealing
where
authfriend wrote:
As Rick pointed out, the TM mantras are standard bija
mantras. As to the method itself, why would he have
had to pick it up from somebody else?
And I and as well as many other have LONG pointed out too. But it is
not unknown for yogis, tantrics and priests to exchange
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first volume of
the Collected Papers: MMY dreamed it up himself, having
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first volume of
the Collected Papers: MMY dreamed it up himself, having
decided that the traditional
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first volume of
the Collected
authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first volume of
the Collected Papers: MMY dreamed it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first volume of
the Collected Papers: MMY dreamed it up himself, having
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I think the confusion
here is more about when MMY credits Brahmananda Swaraswati with the
knowledge he is referring to the philosophy as handed down in the
Shankara tradition not the meditation technique.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 1:10 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
We certainly do have what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the first
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of Vaj
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
We certainly do have what MMY *wants* folks to
understand, at least, about the origins of the method,
from the essay by Larry Domash in the
I am having trouble with the uniqueness claim of TM. I'll give MMY
credit for standardizing the teaching process for his teachers. But
even the descriptions of the Jesus prayer for Christian monks (before
some of them learned TM) is very similar. I'm really not sure the
whole concentration thing
]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 2:07:52 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, authfriend [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Vaj vajranatha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It already *is* in the record.
What's with the lack of reading comprehension on
this forum lately??
Alright, so you don't have to insult my intelligence! At any rate, I
think Domash's work probably cites the best
Right on, you get it.
curtisdeltablues wrote:
I am having trouble with the uniqueness claim of TM. I'll give MMY
credit for standardizing the teaching process for his teachers. But
even the descriptions of the Jesus prayer for Christian monks (before
some of them learned TM) is very similar.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of BillyG.
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 2:25 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
--- In HYPERLINK
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
It already *is* in the record.
What's with the lack of reading comprehension on
this forum lately??
Alright, so you don't have to insult my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of BillyG.
authfriend jstein@ wrote:
It already *is* in the record.
What's with the lack of reading comprehension on
this forum lately??
Alright, so you don't have to insult my intelligence! At
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have the expertise to determine one way or another where the
technique came from and whether or not MMY invented it, but when I
learned to meditate in 1946 in Germany, the technique was exactly the
same
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:35 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
, which he based upon his understanding of what Maharishi
told him.
You don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
, which he based upon his understanding of what Maharishi
told him.
You don't really imagine MMY wouldn't have read it
before it went to press, do you?
I was there when Domash read it
instructed
after what-- thirty, forty years of daily practice?
- Original Message
From: authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:41:17 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble with the uniqueness claim of TM. I'll give MMY
credit for standardizing the teaching process for his teachers. But
even the descriptions of the Jesus prayer for Christian monks
(before
some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
, which he based upon his understanding of what Maharishi
told him.
You don't really imagine MMY wouldn't have read it
before it went to press, do you?
I was there when Domash read it to MMY.
It still hardly
On Jan 19, 2008, at 4:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
I'm mystified by why so many people get confused
about the difference between This is what MMY
says and What MMY says is true.
So then you're saying that what MMY says, at least on occasion, he
might feel to be lies or half-truths, but he says
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
On Behalf Of authfriend
, which he based upon his understanding of what Maharishi
told him.
You don't really imagine MMY wouldn't have read it
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:46 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
I wish Lawson were still here.
Invite him back. 50 per week, though.
No virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
It already *is* in the record.
What's with the lack of reading comprehension on
All the Saraswati Swamis are tantrics who
worship the Tripuransundari and belong to
the Sri Vidya sect.
Bhairitu wrote:
Fortunately most people here including Billy
don't take you as a reliable source.
Unfortunately, you didn't post any evidence to
counter my comments. In fact, all
Judy wrote:
Yeah, he's not speaking for MMY.
Marshy told me himself that he got my TM mantra from
his guru, Swami Brahmananda Saraswati. It is a fact that
the TM mantra used by Swami Brahmananda Saraswati came
from the Sri Vidya sect and from his Master, Swami
Krishnanand Saraswati of
On Jan 19, 2008, at 3:14 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
I find
it hard to believe that plenty of Japa practicers didn't chill out
with a similar technique to TM.
And of course they have. It's nothing new at all--except canned
parts like checking and mantra selection.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 4:52 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
I find
it hard to believe that plenty of Japa practicers didn't chill out
On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 4:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
I'm mystified by why so many people get confused
about the difference between This is what MMY
says and What MMY says is true.
So then you're saying that what MMY says, at least on occasion,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy wrote:
Yeah, he's not speaking for MMY.
Marshy told me himself that he got my TM mantra from
his guru, Swami Brahmananda Saraswati. It is a fact that
the TM mantra used by Swami Brahmananda Saraswati
Actually that isn't the first instruction. The
*very* first instruction is, Sit easily.
What does that mean?
I would welcome a discussion about TM and other meditations. I am
rethinking this area. I think you might have found a lot of TTC a
pain in the ass Judy. but I think you would have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 4:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
I'm mystified by why so many people get confused
about the difference between This is what MMY
says and What MMY says is true.
So then you're saying that what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 3:14 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
I find
it hard to believe that plenty of Japa practicers didn't chill out
with a similar technique to TM.
And of course they have. It's nothing new at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually that isn't the first instruction. The
*very* first instruction is, Sit easily.
What does that mean?
I would welcome a discussion about TM and other meditations. I am
rethinking this area. I think
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 5:02 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Don’t know about mantra
On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
]On Behalf Of Vaj
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 4:52 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's secret!
I find
it hard
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
