[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote: > > Randy, > > You are showing a bit of naiveté about Vaj. > > Now that you are feeling nice and relieved about NagaVaj's > expansive views please remember his method of turning > around your post to imply you had a poisoned intent. Exa

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

Vaj's use of "Mahesh" is like a nice Zen Master's smack across your back with a bamboo pole. Keeps you focused. I use "Maharishi" almost exclusively, since he captured my heart and there's a ton of old patterns still operative that I have not been able to yank out by the roots. To me, using

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Randy Meltzer" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote: Hey Vaj, I forgot to mention in my previous post that I had a meeting with Shankaracharya Swaroopananda who as you may know is the other person claiming to be the Shankara

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote: >Yes Bill. I have noticed in some of Vaj's back and forth posts with me, he >seems to start to try to start a point but doesn't respond to what I further >bring up. Its like he is good at saying what he has to say, but can't really >defe

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

Randy, You are showing a bit of naiveté about Vaj. Now that you are feeling nice and relieved about NagaVaj's expansive views please remember his method of turning around your post to imply you had a poisoned intent. He demonstrated it just a few posts ago. Post 220779 @ 01:12 p.m. Vaj:

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 4:50 PM, BillyG. wrote: > > >> What I meant by "us ignorant TMers" is the fact that your posts > >> mostly seem to be saying that you have more knowledge and > >> experience that most TMers, or at least the ones here.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

On Jun 4, 2009, at 4:50 PM, BillyG. wrote: >> What I meant by "us ignorant TMers" is the fact that your posts >> mostly seem to be saying that you have more knowledge and >> experience that most TMers, or at least the ones here. And to say >> this list is not a Maharishi list is ridiculous

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > >> > >>> So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what are you doing on this forum? Do you feel its your job to somehow bring the lig

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Randy Meltzer" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > > > > > So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what are > > > you doing on this forum? Do you fe

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy - on Mahesh

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > > > So Vaj, if you don't consider him a maharishi or a yogi, what are > > you doing on this forum? Do you feel its your job to somehow > > bring the light of knowledge to all us ignora

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

Posted by: "Kirk" kirk_bernha...@cox.net tripura_kirk Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:16 am (PST) Billy, I am liking your style. I am yoni-whipped alright

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > So, I have anger at MMY and the TMO for fucking with the minds of my > > friends. I have anger that the MMY was a guru to those close to him > > but left all the rank and file to deal with their own problems, like > > "unstressing," while as

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

Billy, I am liking your style. I am yoni-whipped alright. I like it that way.

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

thanks again-- i'll just be quiet now and enjoy your writing in silence for awhile. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote: > > Y'all are embarrassing me a bit. Better be careful. I could end up > super-heady like Vaj or swinging roundhouse punches at the shadows on > the wall

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

Y'all are embarrassing me a bit. Better be careful. I could end up super-heady like Vaj or swinging roundhouse punches at the shadows on the wall like Kirk. On the other hand, maybe not. Sister Caroline, up on the 4th floor nursing unit, detects even the slightest imbalance and bring me back to th

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

emptybill's writing is like a spoken tapestry in its richness. really first class stuff- vibrant and lively and funny as hell! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim wrote: > > > > > Vaj throws doubt on everything else but b

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim wrote: > > Vaj throws doubt on everything else but believes > firmly in himself. That is why he was unable to > get it. Judy certainly got it and she doesn't even > like Vaj. FWIW, both ed11 and raunchydog also got it. And neither of them like Vaj

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy or Kirk

Kirk, you need to check out your keyboard. You keep typing in navanath when you are obviously trying to hit naganath. The fact is that Vaj denied being a Gaudiya Vaishnava but not being a naga. It was very revealing. But then he has no sense of humor. In this way Vaj reminds me of Baptist Jimmy

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

So, I have anger at MMY and the TMO for fucking with the minds of my > friends. I have anger that the MMY was a guru to those close to him > but left all the rank and file to deal with their own problems, like > "unstressing," while asking them to give all to the movement, making > false and exagg

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

- From: "nablusoss1008" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: >> >> Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi priomised. Not a single >> lift-off ev

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

Sorry nowblowus, but I'm an MIU grad and I was on Purusha for a year and I was at MIU when they had 9,000 people, and what can you say to that? - Original Message - From: "nablusoss1008" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: To R

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > > > > > Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi > > > priomised. Not a single lift-off ever in TMO. >

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi priomised. Not a single > lift-off ever in TMO. I know the two sons of a TM teacher and they lost > respect for their own father for his believing, nay, not only beliving, but > perpetuating th

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > > > > > Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi priomised. Not a single > > > lift-off ever in TMO. > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- On Wed, 2/18/09, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > Sorry mate, plenty of lift-off's. I done app 7 meters > in one jump > myself. Nabs! What did Mother Divine tell you about fibbing? hmmm?

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > > > Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi priomised. Not a single > > lift-off ever in TMO. > > Sorry mate, plenty of lift-off's. I done app 7 meters in one jump > my

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--another type of flying: (where Rajinder Singh says "what a thrill it is to fly at supersonic speed"...) referring to the Sidhi of controled out of body travel: http://www.bealenet.com/~jmcfall/Rajinder.htm - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

he appeared to be. Vaj was actually a Gaudiya Vaishnava disciple of one of the Hare Krsna ritvik-gurus who was still active here in America. Vaj was performing a task requested by his initiating guru, Srila Vijayadarshana dasa Goswami. The request was for Vaj to follow in the lead of prior Vaish

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kirk" wrote: > > Fact is, none of us experience what Maharishi priomised. Not a single > lift-off ever in TMO. Sorry mate, plenty of lift-off's. I done app 7 meters in one jump myself. Yours, and many many others, problem is that you lack patience and mo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

ary 17, 2009 7:59 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy > in other words Randy, Vaj invalidates what you said, that the > Maharishi has provided you with everything that he promised, and now > Vaj says he didn't say that, that instead you are confused. > > its simple to Va

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

se. (Except for love and friendship). - Original Message - From: "enlightened_dawn11" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 6:12 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy > in other words Randy, Vaj will not take you at your word when you > say your practice of TM has bee

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy about Vaj

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:11 AM, raunchydog wrote: > > > emptybill, tHis explains a lot. Knowing the motivations and > > affiliation of a would be interloper on FFLife helps level the playing > > field. Thanks. Vaj is a Hare Krishna guy? Who

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy about Vaj

On Feb 18, 2009, at 2:11 AM, raunchydog wrote: emptybill, tHis explains a lot. Knowing the motivations and affiliation of a would be interloper on FFLife helps level the playing field. Thanks. Vaj is a Hare Krishna guy? Who knew? As he hypocritically hides the identity of his affiliation, a

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy about Vaj

emptybill, tHis explains a lot. Knowing the motivations and affiliation of a would be interloper on FFLife helps level the playing field. Thanks. Vaj is a Hare Krishna guy? Who knew? As he hypocritically hides the identity of his affiliation, ashamed and fearful of derision, he enjoys the catbi

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy about Vaj

hats off to you emptybill! brilliant, entertaining and informative, all without sacrificing any of the three- i guess the reason Vaj doesn't post on here -all- the time is he is busy soliciting donations at the airport, and dancing on the sidewalk. cheers! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter wrote: > > Hey, I like Vaj. He and I have completely different takes on MMY, but so what. Like the black and white cookie: world peace. And who is this Randy Melzer anyway? Is he a Hare Krishna spy? How do we know for sure? … Hi Randy, Welcome to th

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

lol- precisely Sal, and why is Randy's opinion so important to YOU? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > > > Vaj, > > You again have invalidated me and people like me with good > > experiences with TM. You mentioned a

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

in other words Randy, Vaj invalidates what you said, that the Maharishi has provided you with everything that he promised, and now Vaj says he didn't say that, that instead you are confused. its simple to Vaj, Randy, and it should be simple to you; all of us are wrong (eight posters at last co

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:12 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote: > in other words Randy, Vaj will not take you at your word when you > say your practice of TM has been everything that the Maharishi has > promised. he will however take the merest hearsay, if negative about > the practice of TM, and state it

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:05 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > Vaj, > You again have invalidated me and people like me with good > experiences with TM. You mentioned above that you don't really buy > that there are people who have found everything that Maharishi > promised through TM, even though they beli

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: Vaj, You again have invalidated me and people like me with good experiences with TM. You mentioned above that you don't really buy that there are people who have found everything that Maharishi promised through TM, even though they believe they

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

"reminds me of that show on TV, 60 Minutes, always going after the small fry, but as for institionalized corruption and failure, they turn a blind eye." Correction: 60 Minutes takes on many big stories --- On Wed, 2/18/09, enlightened_dawn11 wrote: in other words

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

in other words Randy, Vaj will not take you at your word when you say your practice of TM has been everything that the Maharishi has promised. he will however take the merest hearsay, if negative about the practice of TM, and state it as fact here. he ends his post with a serious admonition ab

[FairfieldLife] Re: To Randy

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote: > > > On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Randy Meltzer wrote: > > >> What post or posts are you referring to Randy? > > > > I am referring to any and all posts where you seem to indicate that > > TM has no validity. > > I've never said that Randy. I d