Look at Edit-Preferences. There is an option for "Respect instrument
ranges when copying". This may be your problem. I always leave that
turned off because it seems "too helpful", if you know what I mean.
On 1/23/2015 2:29 PM, Don Hart wrote:
> Hi Everyone--Happy New Year,
>
> Got to the en
Thanks Geoff. That is essentially the solution I stumbled on before I
saw your response.
I take you point about the possibility of making pencil marks
mid-section, but if there are important punches, I try to indicate them
anyway. I'm not sure I have seen a drummer with a pencil recently. :)
the first bar of it. (It can be a hidden.)
> That causes the multimeas rest to disappear and you can then make it look
> however you like. I do this for TACET passages where I don't want to show
> the number of bars rest.
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Craig Parmerlee
>
In most of the big band charts I write, for the drummer I write a
measure or two with the suggest beat pattern, then turn the rest of the
measures into staff style Z so they will appear as a multi-measure rest
up to the next double bar. If there are any important punches, I will
typically show
Yes, there is. I wouldn't have believed it, but it works, at least in
F2014.
1) You must have each layer going to a separate MIDI channel. Do this
in the Score manager.
2) There are different approaches to turning sound on and off per pass.
Most people use velocity, but I have the best res
was what I needed
in this case, so I'm happy.
On 1/21/2015 11:48 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Oops, you're right. Or you could also apply the T.C. staff style to FH1.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Craig Parmerlee
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think that works. If
obertgpatterson.com> wrote:
>
>> If you can live with clef changes on barlines, you can create a
>> transposition staff style with forced clef that you apply only to the part.
>> But there is no way to do it with mid-measure clefs that I know of...more's
>> the
part.
> But there is no way to do it with mid-measure clefs that I know of...more's
> the pity.
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Craig Parmerlee
> wrote:
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/li
That worked. Thanks.
Now I have another similar problem on the same part. There is a passage
where the two horns are in octaves. This is all in T.C. on the score.
The lower part ends up with 4 ledger lines, so I'd like to put it into
B.S. on the managed part.
It seems that that if you apply
I guess that must be what happened. I wasn't aware of that option. I
looked at Document Options-Layers dialog box "Hide Layer when inactive"
was unchecked in all layers, but didn't realize there was another option
that basically did the same thing.
Live and learn I guess.
Thanks,
CP
On 1/21
I have a Brother MFC-J6710DW multi-function inkjet that prints and scans
up to 11x17. The MFC will save directly to a network location (FTP) as
PDF, JPG, TIFF or whatever. As a printer, it will do 2-sided printing
of 11x1y. And you can copy up to 11x17 too, of course.
I have a large format l
I have a French Horn part that has FH1 and FH2 on the same staff in the
score. There is one 5-measure passage that is a solo in FH1. I want
these 5 measures to show as multi-measure rest on the managed FH2 part.
By putting whole rests in the second layer and configuring FH2 to take
Layer 2 w
I had a bizarre problem crop up. I wonder if anybody else has seen this.
I am working on an orchestral score. Most of the instruments have their
own staff, but a few are doubled up (FH1&2, FH3&4, Tpt1&2, etc) I use
manage parts most of the time I can simply stack the notes and let
Manage Par
Yes, I have had Signs and Coda symbols move to a completely different
place after all the staves are locked.
I have also been seeing a weird one that isn't really related to
printing (I hope). I have some parts entered two-to-a-staff using
layers 1 and 2. When I do playback, some of the stems
e accurate reading. By taking an extra 10
minutes on the layout, I can save 20 minutes in rehearsal and have fewer
errors in performance.
On 12/28/2014 6:53 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> On 12/27/2014 7:49 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>> Is this a facet of the page view mode? I work al
Is this a facet of the page view mode? I work almost exclusively in
scroll mode until the final layout time and this just doesn't come up
much as an issue.
On 12/27/2014 10:22 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
> Thanks, I know that method and am forced to use it every time I move a
> measure to
And you can easily clear all locks by selecting the entire score and
doing ctl-shft-L (I believe that is the command on Windows).
On 12/22/2014 3:38 PM, j...@thomastudios.com wrote:
> To my knowledge, the only time Finale will lock the systems is either by the
> keyboard command, CMD-L, or i
If you are a Windows user, TAudioCOnverter works great. It is super
fast, especially when converting a whole batch of files. It will use
all the available cores and hyperthreads on your CPU. I realize it is
an extra step in the our workflow, but it is so fast I don't mind that.
If I am wor
There is only one bug fix mentioned with this release:
Contents of the previous measure no longer overwrite existing music when
selecting the "Move the extra notes to the next measure" option in
Speedy Entry
There are some clean-up items that people have requested, so that is
progress. This e
On 11/29/2014 2:04 PM, Steve Parker wrote:
>
>> Also, as Chris says, parentheses make accidentals more difficult to read.
>
> The opposite of my experience.
> When someone has brought some unknown Sondheim to an audition, there are
> better things to do than to keep skipping back in the measure to
On 11/28/2014 10:37 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Most major publishers these days do not parenthesise courtesy accidentals
> either.
Really?
That surely isn't my experience. I don't recall seeing any recently
published music from a respected publishing house that does it that way.
I find th
If you parenthesize the cautionary accidentals, you will NEVER be called
on it by any serious musician. The very best musicians appreciate the
efforts of the composer/arranger/publisher to make them look good.
I can't count the number of times that good musicians have made bad
entrances becaus
I think he means you have to go through a note at a time in Speedy Entry
and hide the ones that are duplicate -- but then go back in the
individual parts to show the accidentals where necessary.
On 11/25/2014 7:48 AM, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
> Thank you, Lee! Yes, unison C#'s in both layers
It was really messed up in the early 2014 versions, but the current
patch is working for me.
I have always found that plug-in to be confusing. I only use "Courtesy
naturals" and "Key cancellations", and always select "parenthesize"
On 11/17/2014 6:34 PM, Ryan wrote:
> Is the Cautionary Accid
On 10/21/2014 5:05 PM, John Roberts wrote:
> On Finale 2014 -
>
> I do mostly guitar tablature. I have closed files that look perfectly
> good, and when I re-open I have often found measures where the music, or
> part of the music, is missing, or some of the tab is missing. It may be
> a function o
On 10/19/2014 9:37 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> It is difficult for me to understand what it is you expect MM to do. They
> don't have the resources to patch versions before the current version.
> Would you be happy if MM issued a patch with any fixes needed to bring
> Fin14 fully functional in Yo
This seems like a really simple thing and the answer should be obvious,
but I haven't been able to figure it out. I have never run Finale on a
notebook. A friend was at my house this afternoon. She recently
upgraded to F2014 and we were going over various tips and techniques.
One thing she
As far as I know, he has made no such statements publicly other than the
vague, bland non-denial the day they announced they were moving to
Boulder. Have you seen any?
I really would have thought that would be a priority, considering that
the news was basically, "We're firing the CEO, we're mo
David,
I generally agree with your comments on this subject. But I really
don't think this is a Wall Street play in this instance. I think it is
a case where Finale as an independent company could not find a business
model that worked consistently.
It seems to me that this SHOULD have worked
martmusic you need to have finale so.
>>
>> Programmers are a dime a dozen. As long as they retain the architects
>> of the program's it should be fine. I have less worries about finale
>> and makemusic than I do with avid and Sibelius
>>
>> Sent fro
See
http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/news/2014/10/03/makemusic-hq-move-eliminate-120-minnesota-jobs.html
"The company, which develops software for teaching and composing music,
offered transfers to more than half of its workers and several dozen
have agreed to move, Fisher said. Because s
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> UmI'm supposed to know this? Probably when the next version of Finale
> comes around?
>
> On Oct 13, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> OK, Eric. When can I buy the new version that corrects some of the old
>> bugs? Money is no
OK, Eric. When can I buy the new version that corrects some of the old
bugs? Money is not the issue for me. The amount of my valuable time
this product wastes is the issue.
On 10/13/2014 1:35 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> And Adobe also does what people are accusing MakeMusic of.moving on
Yes, 2014 definitely has improvements. But it made a huge step BACKWARD
in HP. On all prior releases, I never had to fiddle with HP. I simply
turned it on and the music sounded better - much better. I understand
that there are additional tweaks that people do to improve on the "out
of the b
On 10/13/2014 10:29 AM, dershem wrote:
> Given the dominance of bugs over actual fixes and improvements, I have
> stuck with F2010. Every version since then has been so problem-ridden
> as to make it unusable.
Yes, I know many people have made that decision. But my question is
really more about
I use F2014. On balance, for me it does enough things better than
earlier releases to justify staying on that level. But just barely.
The product is still riddled with bugs. The most annoying ones for me
are in Human Playback. There are all sorts of cases where volumes get
gut back to almo
On 9/30/2014 9:21 AM, Jan Angermüller wrote:
> - note dropouts with certain rhythmic feel settings
> (MIDI note off is sent message before (!) note on message)
> - certain instrument names are not recognized in HP although they use
This seems to be worse in 2014. Sometimes to get HP to play
You might try a Craigslist ad to see if you can find somebody to do this
on commission. Make sure they have some experience with search engine
optimization and promotion through social networks because that is what
will generate the income for both of you. The website stuff is not
complicated
illed who'd be
> willing to work without getting a flat fee up front.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - DJA
> -
> WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Raymond Horton wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I do appreciate it, and will pass it along.
>>
This was my point. Ray said he didn't want a bunch of technical
recommendations. He already has the site on Weebly and it isn't very
difficult to add the catalog and checkout features to the Weebly site.
There is no reason to move to some other platform. A good web designer
could figure out
FWIW, what you are describing is well within the range of what Weebly
can do. Weebly isn't all things to all people, but it is a rather
straightforward system for setting up basic websites, and definitely
includes the ability to sell products online, such as your
arrangements. If you already
Is there a way to use the Score merger function (i.e. keeping the
different layouts in separate scores)? I have never used that feature so
I don't know if that might be a solution.
On 8/20/2014 11:38 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FinWin2014.
>
> Is there a way to reorder stave
Wow. That parent company has absolutely nothing to do with music. They
talk about this as if making music is analogous to doing chin-ups. And
notice that they are dumping the whole MakeMusic management team, or so
it seems." Current MakeMusic CEO, Karen VanDerBosch and the rest of her
execut
I have no idea what Quicklook and Spotlight are. Are these Mac things
that allow you to preview and print the document without actually
opening in Finale?
I could see that could be useful, but that hasn't been a deal breaker
for me, as I've never had that capability in the first place. It sou
..
>
> Steve P.
>
> On 25 Jul 2014, at 23:27, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> I had a problem last week where Finale 2014c would not let me adjust
>> hairpins horizontally. I could drag them, but Finale set that right
>> back when I finished the drag. That sounds simi
I had a problem last week where Finale 2014c would not let me adjust
hairpins horizontally. I could drag them, but Finale set that right
back when I finished the drag. That sounds similar to what you are
experiencing. I did not have any complicated time signatures. And
curiously, today I wen
I am working on a score where I have to use another organization's
template. For some reason, HP blows right through the fermatas as if it
doesn't see them. HP is working in all other respects. I even went
into the HP settings for tempo variations and set the minimum fermata to
several secon
Quick update here. I submitted to Finale and they accepted it as a
product defect to be fixed.
It only comes into play when using Smartsynth. If you use Aria, the
problem does not occur.
On 7/7/2014 5:31 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> I have a peculiar problem. I am doing a project fo
Looks like a small fix list:
Crashing behavior introduced in Finale 2014b on some Windows computers
has been resolved.
MIDI key velocity information is now played back in all layers.
Stop and start values are now interpreted correctly by Human Playback.
Apparently this fixes the aiolib.dll pro
ow-stopper, but is definitely annoying. And here's another
curiosity. If I take the misbehaving score and reassign the MIDI
instrument and/or channel, that staff no longer plays back at all.
On 7/7/2014 5:31 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> I have a peculiar problem. I am doing a project
I have a peculiar problem. I am doing a project for a professional
orchestra that has a professional library staff. They are supplying the
template I have to adhere to. FWIW, that was a 2012 template and I am
using Windows Finale 2014. The template imported fine and I am having
no difficult
On 6/25/2014 11:39 PM, arabus...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> Do these "crashes" you're talking about include the situation where a box
> pops up with the notice that "Finale has stopped working"?
>
> Aaron J. Rabushka
>
Yes. And in most cases, that was followed by a recovery.
The fix that Jim suggest
Thanks. I'll give that a try.
On 6/25/2014 9:20 PM, Williams, Jim wrote:
> Craig...
>
> makemusic.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5573
>
> This should fix what ails you, as I mentioned earlier.
>
> Jim
>
> James C. Williams, MBA, CFP
> E. B. Lacy Professor of Business
> Franklin College
>
Is anybody successfully using Win 8.1 with Finale 2014B?
I upgraded my music system about 10 days ago. Most of my time on the
system has been with a DAW. I have had all the usual annoyances getting
a new OS settled in and all the stuff everybody hates about 8.1, but I
had zero application cra
eady if it
improves stability?
Thanks,
Craig
On 6/25/2014 4:36 PM, Williams, Jim wrote:
> Craig-
> If you get the updated aiolib.dll, your crashes will cease.
> Jim
>
> Sent from my iPhone, so please pardon all the typos.
>
>> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:33 PM, "Craig Parme
I am running Finale 2014B. I recently upgraded my workstation. I would
have preferred to keep it at Windows 7, but the only practical option
was Windows 8.1.
Since that time, I am having crashes about once an hour -- and not
necessarily on the same functions. The crashes seem random. In mos
It seems there really is no practical way to use chord suffixes in
Finale, for all but the simplest of chords, without actually knowing the
suffix number and entering the chord using the "colon syntax". And in
turn, that means you practically need a reference card to know what
those suffixes ar
Yet more bugs / annoyances / bad ideas. I was able to get to the dialog
as you suggested. Just for fun, I selected all my suffixes and clicked
delete. This would make sense on a document that had no chords, to
prepare to import a new suffix library.
As it happens, I had entered one chord in
This is all very discouraging. I appreciate the solution to being able
to delete chord (the version of the selection dialog that includes the
documented buttons. It is hard to imagine how they could make this part
of their software any less usable without simply crashing -- oh wait, I
did cra
Thanks. Those sound like some good suggestions. I did screen shots of
the select suffix page and made a big card of everything, but that's
really unwieldy, and has a lot of redundant entries covering different
nomenclature systems (but not the system I see most often (CM7, Cm7, etc).
It seems
According to
http://www.finalemusic.com/UserManuals/Finale2014Win/Finale.htm#Finale/Chord_Suffix_Selection.htm
"The Chord Suffix Selection dialog box ... allows you to select, delete,
or edit any of the suffixes; it also provides an entrance to the Chord
Suffix Editor,"
None of this seems to b
Further information on the chord suffixes. I stumbled onto a video that
exposed the (not very well documented) trick of entering chords like
A:0. The ":0" causes a dialog to pop up with a list of available chord
suffixes. The one I need in this case is #65 on my system and has the
suffix nam
I have found the the whole chord thing unbelievably tedious for as long
as I have used Finale -- over 10 releases I'm sure.
I decided to take some time to really try to learn how to make the
system work tonight. This has been a miserable failure.
My ideal would be to be able to enter chords as
Windows 8 is HORRIBLE. Microsoft deserves to go out of business because
of this one. The metro user interface is horrendous. Only a complete
corporate idiot could believe that users actually want to have a cell
phone interface on their desktop.
As an operating system, 8.1 is functional, alth
I use chord symbols on almost every project I do, and Finale drives me
nuts every time. For me, the spacing is the least of my problems
(although I agree spacing is not great). To me, it is a lot more
basic. Every chord I want to enter, Finale doesn't seem to recognize,
and it doesn't seem t
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2014/02/avid-delays-financial-reporting-promises-brighter-future-including-pro-tools-sibelius/
I thought they were already suspended by NASDAQ because they haven't
produced any financial statements for well over a year now. So I am not
sure exactly what changed in
It really is a shame because 2014 is a good release in many respects.
The Windows version has caused me relatively few problems, but this
smart copy one is enough to drive one batty.
I had hoped they had turned the corner after taking so much time to get
2014 out.
I compare Finale with Cakewa
me require the use of the mouse
> - not at all convenient. This is the first time I've been so frustrated with
> an "upgrade".
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> There are a bunch of bugs in the A version. That smart find an
There are a bunch of bugs in the A version. That smart find and paste
is so messed up, it is practically unusable. Half the time, when
copying hairpins, some of them get wildly wrong coordinates in the
target measures, stretching them over 40 measures or something. And it
no longer finds matc
I forgot to include the link. Here is that chart that correlates the
different systems.
http://www.thepapermillstore.com/media/shop-by/paperweightsdemystified_11.pdf
On 3/10/2014 11:50 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> There is a good chart that correlates the various weight systems. The
>
On 3/10/2014 9:28 PM, Ryan Beard wrote:
> That's who I use. The paper I like is discontinued.
>
>
I'm sure you have already been through their full catalog, but just for
the record, they have a bunch of 100# text choices, which is a good
weight. But they are all white and mostly glossy.
http://
Considering just how hard it is to come up with appropriate paper, this
seems like something that Makemusic ought to consider handling.
That would make a lot more sense than each of us going on individual
scavenger hunts.
I realize this would be a small sideline, but it would be a real service
I have looked everywhere for laser printer paper that is close to what
the engraving houses have historically used. The closest I have been
able to come is
Cougar Digital Domtar Earth Choice Item 2227 250 sheets 100/40 lb (148
g/m2)
This is white letter size. I think they make the same prod
Are you guys on the Mac version? I have never had any problems with
this on the Win version. Text boxes in general can be a little
confusing as sometimes it is unclear whether it is the entire control
that has focus or if you are editing INSIDE the control, but if you
single-click and look fo
Avid has certainly had their problems, both financially and
product-wise. If you look at their financials, their revenues had
stabilized at about $650M a year through 2011 and their reports
indicated they were closing their deficit. But apparently they never
published a 2012 annual statement,
Sorry about that, Peter. I don't know what I was thinking.
On 2/24/2014 4:12 AM, Peter Taylor wrote:
> By the way Craig, it's Peter, not Price. I would have thought you'd know me
> after 15 years here! :)
>
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
h
ons having 1st and 2nd
> endings. I want the repeats in the first section to be taken in the DC.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 23, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I don't understand the problem. I think the issue is that you need
>
Well, there are trade-offs, of course. For jazz band charts, I like to
keep the parts to 2 pages for horns and drums, 3 for bass, and no more
than 4 for piano. But I never do a DS or DC that will go back more
than one page.
If there are good opportunities for page turns, I don't mind going to
Something seems to be messed up. I have received that several times in
the past 36 hours. The messages eventually went through, after about 24
hours.
On 2/23/2014 2:21 PM, Ryan wrote:
> Assuming this goes through...
> Has anyone received this type of message before?
>
> -- Forwarded m
ust
> concerned with getting the playback to behave how I want it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 21, 2014, at 9:37 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>> That sounds confusing. If I were reading that score I'd play all 4
>> times before proceeding to the next
That sounds confusing. If I were reading that score I'd play all 4
times before proceeding to the next section.
As far as making the playback work right, that is simply a matter of
putting in the right number for "jump on pass" at the "to coda" mark.
The way I normally see this indicated to th
That sounds confusing. If I were reading that score I'd play all 4
times before proceeding to the next section.
As far as making the playback work right, that is simply a matter of
putting in the right number for "jump on pass" at the "to coda" mark.
The way I normally see this indicated to th
And you would probably never be able to rent anything from that
publisher again, or else they would establish a "special price" just for
you. For orchestras, there are only a few big houses that hold the
rights to most of the non-public-domain literature. And any given work
may be available f
Amen, brother. My orchestra is paying almost twice per rental what we
paid just 5-6 years ago. That is WAY above the rate of inflation. It
is affecting what we can program.
When you pay $800 to rent a big work, it does seem reasonable to expect
that the parts are error free. Most of these
em areas in time for them to be happily corrected.
>
> thanks,
>
> tim
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> These
>> were not bad compositions. And I am certain the composers were
>> excellent musicians. But the
player 1 is supposed to be reading all three parts.) This all
comes down to the issue, do you want musicians to play the music
correctly or don't you? If you want the music played correctly, then
notate it correctly.
Sorry about the rant, but this stuff really sets me off sometimes.
On 2
See the video interview at
http://blog.steinberg.net/2014/02/watch-daniel-on-the-audio-podcast-104/
Nothing new here, other than an indication that this is years away.
Daniel did make a few interesting comments about the challenges of
integrating with the compositional/DAW world, but that integ
See the video interview at
http://blog.steinberg.net/2014/02/watch-daniel-on-the-audio-podcast-104/
Nothing new here, other than an indication that this is years away.
Daniel did make a few interesting comments about the challenges of
integrating with the compositional/DAW world, but that integ
There are several examples on this page:
http://www.noteperformer.com/?mode=
It seems they used crappy samples for Finale, and they also have the
volume about 4 db lower. The loudness of the Sibelius samples makes the
product sound "better" but that is basically a cheap parlor trick.
There ma
Exactly as I see it too. There haven't been many revolutionary changes
in Finale in the past 4 or 5 years, but there have been a whole bunch of
subtle refinements that really do represent progress. I just wish when
they are working with a feature such as showing repeat markers in the
last bar
On 2/2/2014 7:50 PM, Peter Taylor wrote:
> Well, in my book you *should* break a MM rest to show embedded markers
> and expressions etc. To reach a D.S. or "To Coda" etc. before you've
> finished counting the empty measures seems very wrong to me, and I
> guess to Finale's authors too..
Finale
On 2/2/2014 6:52 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
> It's not elegant. It's clumsy - but it does work, and it's the only
> way I know to accomplish a part that looks right.
It seems to me that Jari's solution, while still a work-around, will
allow you to get the parts to look right without having to res
On 2/2/2014 3:34 PM, Peter Taylor wrote:
> I'm with Christopher on this question - I *always* use expressions for
> text repeats, and cccasionally I've even inserted them in the measure
> AFTER a MM rest to make sure they're visible. If I ever want to record
> the playback I use hidden text repe
On 2/2/2014 3:15 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> In Page View, you're just editing the first measure content of the MM
> rest. With repeat text that might be confusing, since the measure
> contents of the last measure is also displayed. Use Scroll View and
> edit the position of the repeat text of
On 1/31/2014 5:03 PM, Lawrence Yates wrote:
> Is the failure of the repeat text to appear in the part not the same
> problem I had the other week? Go into the Staff tool, double click on the
> staff and in the resulting dialogue box check "endings and text repeats"
The repeat markers ARE appeari
On 1/31/2014 3:58 PM, Don Hart wrote:
> FWIW, you should be able to move
> the exp. in the score after the part is made and not have to
> break/re-create mm rests
Not in my case, I don't think. I have this "To coda" mark assigned to
the top staves only. This is the default and a good one. I hat
On 1/31/2014 3:58 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
> if an expression in the score is attached to the last measure of a MM rest,
> it will appear in the part only if that last measure is broken off
This is not actually what I am seeing with F2014a. My "To Coda" is
attached to measure 56. There are doub
What were your "two simple moves"? Are you saying that when the "To
coda" mark is within a mm rest, you are able to drag the "To coda"
mark? I cannot.
I don't have any reason to suspect this is a new bug. I bet it has been
out there forever. But I am running F1400a on Windows 7, FWIW.
On
Let me see if I can explain more clearly. I have an 8-bar section --
bars 50-57 -- where most of the winds are resting. The "To coda" jump
occurs at the end of bar 56. That is where I placed the mark in the
score. In the parts that are resting, I expect to see a SEVEN BAR mm
rest (50-56) th
e you should probably hide
> it.)
>
> Christopher
>
>
> On Fri Jan 31, at FridayJan 31 10:34 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> H. That may account for everything. I'll go back in and test that
>> this afternoon. However, my situation is that I have an 8-
101 - 200 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
