Patterson Plugins does not have a feature to put tuplets across barlines.
If the tuplet is beamed, then Beam Over Barlines may (or may not) do it
correctly, depending on context.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:38 AM Barbara Touburg wrote:
> On 14-8-2019 16:33, Michael Lawlor wrote:
> > I only have Pa
On 14-8-2019 16:33, Michael Lawlor wrote:
I only have Patterson Plug-Ins Lite, which only deals with beaming
across barlines. Do I need another version?
I don't know. Have you tried it?
You'd have to ask Robert.
Good luck.
___
Finale mailing list
Fin
I only have Patterson Plug-Ins Lite, which only deals with beaming
across barlines. Do I need another version?
Michael
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Finale] Tuplets across barlines
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:45:52 +0200
From: Barbara Touburg
To: Michael Lawlo
This went to Robert, accidentally...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Finale] Lyric window does not show entire lyric
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:47:58 +0200
From: Barbara Touburg
To: Robert Patterson
On 6-8-2019 16:39, Robert Patterson wrote:
Has anyone encountered an issue wh
It is very difficult to compare Dorico with the other products because
Dorico operates on a different plane. Whether that different plane is
good for a person might depend on many factors. I am not here to claim
it is better for everybody, but I definitely am far more productive with
Dorico
If you're interested in trying something new with Finale, you can also
join our Perfect Layout beta test.
The plug-in is a massive layout helper for Finale with more than 100
features including collision detection and automatic score balancing.
More info https://elbsound.studio/perfect-layout/
a
I would be very interested to know more specifics about the things that are
"well beyond Fin/Sib". Graphically, I know about flexible slurs, and I
would be curious to know if lines (like 8va) also have multiple inflection
points.
Beyond that, I would be curious to know what makes Dorico so much mo
I would also note Sibelius 2019 was announced this week. It seems to be
roughly the same magnitude of the Finale 26 release. I am sure the
improvements are welcome, but really, this is a minuscule amount of
improvement for a paid release. Dorico is adding capability 10-to-100
times faster th
Hello Finale and Sibelius Friends,
I'm forwarding this message to both the Finale and Sibelius groups, in
case anybody is interested in exploring Dorico. Using the code DORICO30
you can get 30% off of either Dorico 2 or Dorico Elements 2 (a lighter
version of Dorico) for this week only appare
I was using Aria Player and Garritan, so I have tried switching to
softsynth but still get no sound with glissandi going directly from one
note to the next. It appears to behave if I tie two notes together so
there is only one gliss. attached to each note, but the sound is not
very good and on
I think I found the cure for the problem described below. Turn off MIDI thru.
Now I have a new problem: Finale25 crashes after several minutes with MIDI
thru off.
Larry Eden
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Lawrence David Eden
> Subject: [Finale] MIDI
> Date: June 21, 2018 at 7:17:09
I recommend CutePDF; it works like a charm, there is a free version, and
it was our standard at Sarasota Opera. I bought the pro version as it is
pretty powerful at quite a reasonable price, and you get free upgrades
forever.
Once you install that, you choose CutePDF as your printer, and i
On 16-2-2018 15:27, Robert Patterson wrote:
> I use Click
> Assign
O, that is another can of worms. After Ctrl-Click Assign the cursor
jumps up to the first syllable instead of staying where it is (the last
syllable). Also, every time I switch to click assign, Finale places the
first syllable i
If you are doing "type into score" and/or using a lot of copy and paste
with lyrics, be aware that Finale duplicates syllables like crazy (and
trashes the lyric text blocks). That still doesn't probably get you to
32,767 syllables but it's worth mentioning anyway.
I always try to keep my lyrics te
I'm sorry. I meant to send this to the list.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Finale] Lyrics
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:47:31 +0100
From: Barbara Touburg
To: Robert Patterson
On 16-2-2018 01:06, Robert Patterson wrote:
> I'm virtually certain you can't exceed 32,767 syllables i
Sorry. I meant to send this to the list...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Finale] Display Elapsed Time
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:02:03 +0100
From: Barbara Touburg
To: Michael Johnson
On 23-1-2018 19:38, Michael Johnson wrote:
> You can define a measure number to be time of m
Maybe adding a measure of 0,25 spaces width, that will be not included in
the count of measures and making it "blank" via Staff Styles. If you
prefer, give it a width of 0 (zero) spaces.
I made an example using the suggestion that Rafael has given to you and
adding that measure. Of course it proba
I have worked it out: use the transposition tool rather than the score
manager.
Michael Lawlor
Forwarded Message
Subject:Having problems transposing score
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:11:03 +0100
From: Michael Lawlor
To: finale@shsu.edu
Finale 2014.5
I am modi
Hi Robert,
this raises many questions:
>I can use the Percussion Transposition option, but I have to do this
measure by measure
Why ? As the drum instruments won't be different in every measure, I
would assume that you could change at least each song, phrase, groove
etc. with the same settings
An acquaintance of mine needs to import percussion parts from Sibelius
using Music XML and he is having trouble (as described below). Does anyone
have any suggestions?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Donald Oliver
Date: Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:46 PM
Subject: question
To: Robert Patter
I replied several days ago, saying I saw the message but had no solution.
But my reply is returned undeliverable, for some reason.
On Jan 28, 2016 8:59 AM, "Marcello Noia" wrote:
> Test: did the message below arrive to the list?
> If yes, any solutions?
> Thanks
>
> Messaggio originale -
It did, but I don’t think anyone can diagnose it without seeing the file. Try
the Finale Forum on the MakeMusic site. You can attach files there. It’s very
active, even now (unlike us).
Christopher
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Marcello Noia wrote:
>
> Test: did the message below arrive to
Yes, it did. Sorry, I have no solution.
On Jan 28, 2016 8:59 AM, "Marcello Noia" wrote:
> Test: did the message below arrive to the list?
> If yes, any solutions?
> Thanks
>
> Messaggio originale
> Oggetto:Problem in exporting a Finale file containing a Finale
> groove
>
Test: did the message below arrive to the list?
If yes, any solutions?
Thanks
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Problem in exporting a Finale file containing a Finale groove
into an audio file
Data: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:07:24 +0100
Mittente: Marcello Noia
A: final
Thanks for this important warning!
Harold
Quoting Henry Howey :
> Henry Howey
>
> Sent from my iWhatever
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Finale
>> Date: September 28, 2015 at 16:48:41 CDT
>> To:
>> Subject: Don't Update Your Mac OS Yet
>> Reply-To: Finale
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> El Capi
Henry Howey
Sent from my iWhatever
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Finale
> Date: September 28, 2015 at 16:48:41 CDT
> To:
> Subject: Don't Update Your Mac OS Yet
> Reply-To: Finale
>
>
>
>
> El Capitan and Finale 2014
> According to Apple's website, OS X El Capitan, the latest Mac ope
Thanks, Phil
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Phil Buglass wrote:
>
> Just got another one of these... This time, at least the link to reset
> worked...
>
> Phil.
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject:confirm 2607d060ec28948af89ff522b9ea773fe6c514fa
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Phil Buglass wrote:
>
> Just got another one of these... This time, at least the link to reset
> worked...
>
> Phil.
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject:confirm 2607d060ec28948af89ff522b9ea773fe6c514fa
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:06:22
Just got another one of these... This time, at least the link to reset
worked...
Phil.
Forwarded Message
Subject:confirm 2607d060ec28948af89ff522b9ea773fe6c514fa
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:06:22 -0500
From: finale-requ...@shsu.edu
To: bloke...@comcast.net
Useful site:
>
>
> http://www.pdfmerge.com/
>
>
> Raymond Horton
> Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra
> Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) UMC
> Composer, Arranger
> VISIT US AT rayhortonmusic.com
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Raymond Horton"
Date: Apr 4, 2015 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: test
To: "Dalvin Boone"
Cc:
I got some rejected. Henry has fixed it. Thanks
On Apr 4, 2015 1:51 PM, "Dalvin Boone" wrote:
> Raymond,
>
> Everyone sees your Finale posts; perhaps you are not g
In this particular case, the problem is that before the Edit Page Offset
menu appears, the selection is lost - instead of setting the parameter of
the page number I selected, it sets in the 1st page. This doesn't happen
with Edit Frame Attributes (didn't try with anything else), there I had no
prob
joão, you need to select the "insert text" (in
your case page number) and paste the offset you
want to add to the default.
a 3rd-party script might be quicker and easier to
manage, at least for this particular task. i
have never had much luck with finalescript and
gave up trying to understa
Hello list,
I had a couple of questions regarding finalescript:
- I notice that in fin2012 there are lots of crashes, just when navigating
the palette, but in fin2014 things seem to be ok. Is that your experience
as well?
- I was trying to write a plugin using the Edit Page Offset window. This
On 3/25/2015 10:42 PM, David Woodard wrote:
> I am sure some capable Window's 8.1 guru's could solve that for us, but I
> don't have the bucks to go asking. After months of loosing files with my
> new 8.1 computer, I can finally find my way back to the same file folders
> by starting to save the
Compare the settings that you have in the Midi/Audio menu.
Is "Midi Thru" checked in both?
Make sure that you have all the settings the same in both programs,
including the playback device.
David H. Bailey
On 1/1/2015 12:10 PM, marcellon...@gmail.com wrote:
> Update: in Finale 2011 that still
Update: in Finale 2011 that still resides in my PC, no problem at all
with Nano. What am I missing?
Messaggio Inoltrato
Oggetto:NanoKey and Finale 2012 - no sound in speedy entry mode
Data: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:53:33 +0100
Mittente: marcellon...@gmail.com
Rispon
http://gnyapadmin.org/_waiting.for.you.jpeg?herenjr873643
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu
Thanks, Jim and Jon.
I was very confusing in my post - #1 may be in the
works, I hope to know soon.
I'll look for a couple for you in the meantime. I am narrowing down
the other songs I need right now.
Here is one for certain, but it's played not printed - on a youtube
video, about 30 seconds in
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Raymond Horton"
> What is wrong with this list Why can't my posts make it through when I
post them?
>
> On Jun 29, 2014 2:00 AM, "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <
mailer-dae...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status
Assuming this goes through...
Has anyone received this type of message before?
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:38 AM
Subject: Delivery delayed:Exported Audio too loud
To: ryanwbe...@gmail.com
*Delivery is delayed to these recipients or groups:*
fin..
Henry Howey
Sent from my iWhatever
Begin forwarded message:
From: mailto:tobias_subscri...@tgtools.com>>
Date: February 23, 2014 at 10:05:58 CST
To: mailto:tgto...@yahoogroups.com>>
Subject: [TGTools] TGTools 2.71 for Finale 2010-2014 available (Windows and
Macintosh)
Hello,
this is just
Very well, looking forward!
Giovanni
>Here is word about TGTools
>
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>*From:* tob...@tgtools.de
>*Date:* November 5, 2013 3:25:10 AM PST
>*To:* Eric Dannewitz
>*Subject:* *Re: Finale 2014*
>
>Hello,
>
>yes I will make an update.
>
>Kind Regards,
>Tobias Giesen
>
>Supe
Here is word about TGTools
Begin forwarded message:
*From:* tob...@tgtools.de
*Date:* November 5, 2013 3:25:10 AM PST
*To:* Eric Dannewitz
*Subject:* *Re: Finale 2014*
Hello,
yes I will make an update.
Kind Regards,
Tobias Giesen
Super Flexible Software Ltd. & Co. KG
Buddenstr. 29-31
48143
On 2013-09-17 14:39, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
> Could you please add this to you plugin before TGTools is obsolete?
You are in the JW Lua list as well, I believe? I just posted a script
that'll work in 0.05 there.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Fin
Great. I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Steve
On 9/17/13 1:03 PM, "Jari Williamsson"
wrote:
>On 2013-09-17 14:39, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
>> Could you please add this to you plugin before TGTools is obsolete?
>
>You are in the JW Lua list as well, I believe? I just posted a script
>that'll work in 0.05 t
Jari, it's not that simple. I may make changes to the systems that work
for all layouts that you cannot set globally which is the reason TGTools
transfer works in this situation. I've used it in every job since it's
inception but the initial reason I asked for it was that every marching
band engrav
Hello Jari,
Dan's experience is the only reason I do not use JW Copy Part Layout. When I
contracted Tobias to write his plugin to do this it was important to have two
options. One, to copy the layout systems AND the number of measures per system.
Two, just copy the systems and NOT the number of
On 2013-09-17 14:26, Dan Tillberg wrote:
> "Page format for parts", great, will take a look. Could find anything about
> setting a "nominal" number of systems per page, e. g. 8 on the first page
> and 9 for subsequent pages. This is my problem right now and I know that it
> is possible to fix with
"Page format for parts", great, will take a look. Could find anything about
setting a "nominal" number of systems per page, e. g. 8 on the first page
and 9 for subsequent pages. This is my problem right now and I know that it
is possible to fix with some patience but then I have had problems with
d
On 2013-09-17 10:52, Dan Tillberg wrote:
> 1) What is the best way to create a new part in a given score that adapts
> to an existing part from the design perspective?
When you create a new part (or an additional page in an existing part),
it's based on the "Page Format for Parts" settings. Make
I don't think there is any way without redoing.
I didn't answer before because I was hoping someone might know better.. :-(
Steve P.
On 17 Sep 2013, at 09:52, Dan Tillberg wrote:
> Interesting discussions about Finale's future; this is obviously topics
> that engages people. I am tempted to j
Interesting discussions about Finale's future; this is obviously topics
that engages people. I am tempted to join; shortly I agree to those who say
that Finale typically not needs to be able to do more fancy audio things
(there are other good tools and they are numerous); neither to have more
intel
>Thanks, Christopher. Was assuming care would need to be taken along those and
>similar lines.
Yep. It also can be tripped up by words that have different hyphenations
depending on context, like proj-ect vs pro-ject.
Still, it seems to do a good job most of the time, including on those difficu
Thanks, Christopher. Was assuming care would need to be taken along those and
similar lines.
Don
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Christopher Smith
wrote:
> I've been using it for a long time. Check carefully, though, because it
> doesn't give you common slang hyphenations
I've been using it for a long time. Check carefully, though, because it doesn't
give you common slang hyphenations like "gon-na", and because it has a
liturgical user base, it returns "bless-ed" instead of "blessed" and "pleas-ed"
instead of "pleased."
Christopher
On Fri Apr 5, at FridayApr 5
This is terrific, Greg! Been wishing for something on this order for a
long time. Thank you for sharing!
Don Hart
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Gregory Theisen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my first post. I simply want to share a very useful tool that I
> found on a website. It is a Lyric
Hello,
This is my first post. I simply want to share a very useful tool that I found
on a website. It is a Lyric Hyphenator (english only). I've been using it for
about a year. It works great and it's free! You simply copy and paste lyrics
into the text box, and it automatically hyphenates
OF COURSE! Why didn't I think of that? THANK YOU!
I must've been convinced that the solution was in the Score Manager or
"Change Instrument" feature.
It's been a long week.
Again, thanks.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, John Blane wrote:
> How about using a staff style to hide the key sig where
How about using a staff style to hide the key sig where you don't want it?
On Feb 28, 2013, at 9:06 PM, Ryan wrote:
> Sending again in case this didn't get through...
>
>
>
> I don't want the key cancellation to show when switching to a non-pitched
> percussion instrument.
>
> I h
Sending again in case this didn't get through...
I don't want the key cancellation to show when switching to a non-pitched
percussion instrument.
I have a piece in F Major. A percussionist plays Glock (which needs the key
signature), and other non-pitched instruments (which don't ne
the format has been around longer than copy shops available to the
home user. although this could have been a justification later on.
but i find the extra play you have with 9x12 or 9.5x12.5 to be
extremely valuable for the layout of parts. letter size always
causes problems for elegant layo
Most of my Kalmus parts are (approximately) 10x13 with (approximately) 1
inch margins all around. Kalmus is an American company, but they mostly
just reprint European editions.
Computers take the "approximately" out of the equations, but 10x13 with 1
inch margins is very much within the Kalmus nor
>Eh, what's wrong with 10x13? It is extremely standard in orchestra parts.
... in the states perhaps.
>I am surprised the site list 11x14 as "second best". 11x14 is awful...
it (or B4) can be very useful for performance scores (say 3-5 or so
players) but not for individual parts.
>I also don'
Music paper sizes between 9x12 and 10x13 came into use long before there
were photocopiers. I think it is because it is a good match to available
real estate on a music stand.
10x13 parts fit inside standard band and orchestra folders without any
problems, claims here to the contrary. Some organiz
At 7:09 PM + 11/1/12, Lawrence Yates wrote:
>Here in the UK, most photocopiers work on A4 or A3. We always believed
>that publishers used the unusual (to us) sizes so that the music couldn't
>be easily copied.
Interesting theory. I've always assumed that
this was a size produced by folding
Here in the UK, most photocopiers work on A4 or A3. We always believed
that publishers used the unusual (to us) sizes so that the music couldn't
be easily copied.
On 1 November 2012 18:49, David H. Bailey <
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/2012 8:43 AM, Robert Patterson wro
On 11/1/2012 8:43 AM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Eh, what's wrong with 10x13? It is extremely standard in orchestra parts. I
> am surprised the site list 11x14 as "second best". 11x14 is awful, because
> it does not fit in standard orchestra/band folders. 9x12 is essentially
> equally as common as 1
At 7:43 AM -0500 11/1/12, Robert Patterson wrote:
>Eh, what's wrong with 10x13? It is extremely standard in orchestra parts. I
>am surprised the site list 11x14 as "second best". 11x14 is awful, because
>it does not fit in standard orchestra/band folders. 9x12 is essentially
>equally as common as 1
On Thu, November 1, 2012 2:06 pm, Robert Patterson wrote:
> No: acid free Hammermill Accent Opaque 70# offset "natural white".
> I got it from Xpedx, but it was a few years ago.
Xpedx left the consumer market a few years ago, didn't they?
But thanks for the tip -- I did find something similar, 14
At 8:09 AM -0400 11/1/12, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
>
>One day we'll talk about landscape scores. :)
They seem to work just fine for organists, and
for duo pianists (one part on the left and the
other on the right). They might work for people
reading one to a stand, if there were a reason t
No: acid free Hammermill Accent Opaque 70# offset "natural white".
I got it from Xpedx, but it was a few years ago. In retrospect I think I
got 750 13x20 sheets on that batch, plus some number of 11x17. I can't
recall the exact geometry now. I may have ordered 500 of the big sheets.
But the price
On Thu, November 1, 2012 10:29 am, Robert Patterson wrote:
> The last time I had 20x13 made I bought the minimum which was 250 sheets of
> a large printer size (in the range of 30x40, but I don't recall the exact
> dimensions). Anyway, I ended up with 1000 sheets of 20x13 and about an
> equal numbe
The last time I had 20x13 made I bought the minimum which was 250 sheets of
a large printer size (in the range of 30x40, but I don't recall the exact
dimensions). Anyway, I ended up with 1000 sheets of 20x13 and about an
equal number of 11x17 after they cut it for me. Total cost: $190.
On Thu, Nov
On Thu, November 1, 2012 9:54 am, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Right, but to have properly bound parts of 9x12, you need 18x12 to print
> on. Is that also a standard art size? If so, I am curious where you get it.
It's a stock art size, but it's expensive. Jampaper has it at about $115 for
500 sheets
Right, but to have properly bound parts of 9x12, you need 18x12 to print
on. Is that also a standard art size? If so, I am curious where you get it.
I use 20x13, which I have custom cut. It's a bit more expensive, but not
out of this world. Anyway, as you say, these days the move is towards PDF
de
On Thu, November 1, 2012 8:43 am, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Eh, what's wrong with 10x13? It is extremely standard in orchestra parts. I
> am surprised the site list 11x14 as "second best". 11x14 is awful, because
> it does not fit in standard orchestra/band folders. 9x12 is essentially
> equally as
Eh, what's wrong with 10x13? It is extremely standard in orchestra parts. I
am surprised the site list 11x14 as "second best". 11x14 is awful, because
it does not fit in standard orchestra/band folders. 9x12 is essentially
equally as common as 10x13, so I would say those are the two sizes we
should
On Thu, November 1, 2012 7:43 am, SN jef chippewa wrote:
> musicians are used to 9x12, that would be a more
> appropriate format. and has been a standard for
> very long. i don't think 10x13 is so large that
> the lines (systems) would start to get too long
> to read, but why not use a standard t
the problem you are talking about has nothing to
do with page format. if the music is too small a
percentage it will be too small in any format to
read. ideally you would notate at the proper
size for the final format of the printed parts.
any orchestra musician who can't read the part
bec
I'd like to put in a word in favor of 10x13 paper. It is the standard size
that many orchestra librarians use and prefer. Letter-size looks small on the
music stand and is often hard to read. Anything bigger than 10x13 often won't
fit under a stand light.
But I disagree (if I read it correc
Oops! This was meant to be a private message, not for the list. It had a large
attachment, too. Sorry!
Christopher
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Christopher Smith
> Date: September 16, 2012 8:52:20 PM EDT
> To: finale@shsu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Finale] rebar independent time signature
>
> C
Something to think/worry about …
Eric
Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
webmas...@habsburgerverlag.de
eric.f.fied...@t-online.de
e.fied...@em.uni-frankfurt.de
***
Begin forw
Something to think/worry about …
Eric
Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
webmas...@habsburgerverlag.de
eric.f.fied...@t-online.de
e.fied...@em.uni-frankfurt.de
***
Begin forw
From: "Mark D Lew"
>I see nothing to be gained by pursuing this further.
>
> mdl
I agree. Our thoughts should be with David and his family.
I'm very sorry to hear of his sudden passing. I often enjoyed his posts,
controversial sometimes, plainly spoken and forthright, but they often
raised a
John Howell wrote:
> But I'm curious why Eric thinks this is
> incorrect, and what makes him think that "our"
> David lives in California and yet manages to
> commute to NYC for rehearsals of his viol consort
> at NYU. Got any proof to submit, Eric?
Eric evidently made a mistake, as we all d
At 10:59 AM -0700 11/9/11, Wade KOTTER wrote:
>It's not funny at all, Eric. I was honestly apologizing if my original
>report was incorrect, but I don't think it is. I seldom post on this
>list, but I've been lurking for several years and what David has posted
>about his work (playing the viol, wor
On 10/11/2011 05:52, David H. Bailey wrote:
> On 11/9/2011 12:54 PM, Randolph Peters wrote:
>> On 2011-11-09, at 11:43 AM, Wade KOTTER wrote:
>>
>>> But perhaps we should wait for the real David to post a
>>> correction to the list regarding the alleged false report of his
>>> passing.
>>
>> If you
David H Bailey wrote:
>Just because he has died, which is very sad, there's no need to beat
>about the bush -- he could be downright insulting if he thought a
>person's reply was beneath contempt. Of course, he was always right. :-)
Well, *almost* always
mdl
_
On 11/9/2011 2:15 PM, Mariposa Symphony Orchestra wrote:
> I'm so sorry to hear this news. Yes, David could be brusque to the point of
> maddening frustration,
Just because he has died, which is very sad, there's no need to beat
about the bush -- he could be downright insulting if he thought a
phony Orchestra
Mariposa Symphony Orchestra: http://arts-mariposa.org/symphony.html
Les Marsden - Former Career (retired due to disability) page:
http://tinyurl.com/ygpj7og
- Original Message -
From: "Wade KOTTER"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 6:50 AM
Subject: [Fina
t: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Fwd: [MLA-L] David Fenton
It's the one and same David Fenton. He did not live in San Francisco.
His computer consulting business was based out of New Jersey (across
the Hudson in Weehawken)
Thanks
Kim
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, David H. Bailey
wrote:
> No -- Steve Jobs is working on an app to allow people from the other
> side to communicate with the living through their iPhone, iPod-Touch or
> iPad.
>
I guess that's not being ported to the Android format then? :/
Thanks
Kim
___
On 11/9/2011 12:54 PM, Randolph Peters wrote:
> On 2011-11-09, at 11:43 AM, Wade KOTTER wrote:
>
>> If I'm incorrect, I sincerely apologize to David and everyone else on
>> the list. But perhaps we should wait for the real David to post a
>> correction to the list regarding the alleged false report
On 11/9/2011 12:32 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> this is NOT the same guy people.
>
> This list's Dave fenton lives in the San Francisco bay area
>
This list's Dave Fenton lived in New York City, played viol in a
consort, was working on recording a CD recently, and hasn't posted
anything to the c
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Randolph Peters wrote:
> I'm sorry to hear about David's passing.
>
>
> It IS our David, by the way. Just look at his own signature from letters to
> this list:
>
> David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com
> David Fenton Associates http://dfenton
I'm sorry to hear about David's passing.
It IS our David, by the way. Just look at his own signature from letters to
this list:
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates http://dfenton.com/DFA/
The first link shows his picture with his viol consort.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Wade KOTTER wrote:
> It's not funny at all, Eric. I was honestly apologizing if my original
> report was incorrect, but I don't think it is.
It's not Wade, it's the same gentleman. And thanks for letting us know.
Take care
Kim
_
Im sorry to hear this--my condolences to all his family and friends.
Bob Morabito
On Nov 9, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Wade KOTTER wrote:
> I believe this is the David Fenton who often posted to this list. I
> know
> he was often difficult to deal with, but I still think he should be
> remembered with
On 2011-11-09, at 11:43 AM, Wade KOTTER wrote:
> If I'm incorrect, I sincerely apologize to David and everyone else on
> the list. But perhaps we should wait for the real David to post a
> correction to the list regarding the alleged false report of his
> passing.
If you are correct, wouldn't we
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
