Very well appreciated, thanks for the help!
Giovanni
Giovanni Andreani
www.giovanniandreani.com
www.ga-music.com
> On 16 Aug 2019, at 11:40, David H. Bailey wrote:
>
> On 8/16/2019 1:33 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
>> Is there a way to have a repeated section played-back with a differe
On 8/16/2019 1:33 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
Is there a way to have a repeated section played-back with a different volume
compared to the first time? Let’s say I have a section with articulation ‘f’
followed by ‘p second time or 'p seconda volta’: how can I trigger the p
(piano) articulatio
Is there a way to have a repeated section played-back with a different volume
compared to the first time? Let’s say I have a section with articulation ‘f’
followed by ‘p second time or 'p seconda volta’: how can I trigger the p
(piano) articulation on repeat?
Giovanni
Giovanni Andreani
There are a number of fonts that have single repeat signs.
See attached screenshot. If you use a negative "Tracking" value in
the expression designer it's possible to overlap the two symbols, so
that it looks
like a double repeat sign.
Links to the fonts from the screenshot can be found on
http
Thank you!
Did not know that such a plugin existed [☹]
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
cel.647-292-4605
From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu on behalf of Allen
Fisher
Sent: March 31, 2017 11:07 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] REPEAT
Or use the mid-measure repeat plugin.
Allen
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>
> So, if it is a 4/4 bar, I’d make it two 2/4 bars (or a 3/4 and a 1/4), and
> hide the time signatures and put the repeat in where you need it.
>
>
>> On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:40 AM, dr.a.s. wei
The best way (as someone else has already suggested) to put what appears
to be a mid-measure repeat is to break the existing measure into 2
measures with the appropriate time signature for each section, choosing
the option to have a different signature for display set to the overall
time signat
Create two bars of the appropriate length, hide the time signatures and
put the repeat between the two bars. If you are relying on bar numbers,
you will also have to modify the measure regions so you do not end up
with one bar too many.
Michael Lawlor
On 29/03/2017 14:40, dr.a.s. weinstangel
So, if it is a 4/4 bar, I’d make it two 2/4 bars (or a 3/4 and a 1/4), and hide
the time signatures and put the repeat in where you need it.
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:40 AM, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
>
> Dear all;
>
>
> Never encountered this little problem before:
>
>
> How would you go ab
I've used the app that allows an "internal" repeat sign many times. It is quite
flexible. Don't bother with trying to move a regular repeat sign. You might get
it to work, but why bother when the answer is so easy.
Chordially, John
On 3/29/2017 2:43:28 PM, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
Thank you!
The best way (as someone else has already suggested) to put what appears
to be a mid-measure repeat is to break the existing measure into 2
measures with the appropriate time signature for each section, choosing
the option to have a different signature for display set to the overall
time signa
Thank you!
I've also figured out that possibility.
Was just hoping that there was a way of placing it "after the barline" like a
clef, or dragging it to a location:-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 1:03 PM, "j...@thomastudios.com"
> wrote:
>
> I’ve done this occasionally, and
Of course, from at least Finale 2012 there's a plugin under Plugins -
Measures - mid measure repeats which achieves this.
Cheers,
Lawrence
On 29 March 2017 at 18:06, j...@thomastudios.com wrote:
> Lawrence’s idea is a good one. But you will have to adjust measure
> numbers after the fact. No
Lawrence’s idea is a good one. But you will have to adjust measure numbers
after the fact. Not a big deal tho.
Thanks Lawrence. I’ll have to file this one away for future reference.
***
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Lawrence Yates wrote:
>
Divide the bar (measure) into two and in the time signature box select "use
alternative time signature" then add your repeat mark
Cheers,
Lawrence
On 29 March 2017 at 14:40, dr.a.s. weinstangel wrote:
> Dear all;
>
>
> Never encountered this little problem before:
>
>
> How would you go about
I’ve done this occasionally, and the only way I’ve been able to achieve it is
my creating a measure expression and placing it in the file. If it’s a score
with multiple staves, use an expression set for All Staves. It’s a bit of a
kludge, but it does work.
***
J D Tho
Dear all;
Never encountered this little problem before:
How would you go about placing a repeat sign in the middle of a measure?
TIA for your help.
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
cel.647-292-4605
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@s
I have a two movement work. At the end of the first movement, there is a Da
Capo marking, with the repeat of the first movement happening before the second
movement begins. I used the Repeat tool successfully to place the Da Capo
marking in the last measure of the first movement, and upon playba
On 19-Oct-14, at 19-Oct-14 4:36 PM, Peter Taylor wrote:
> On 20.10.2014 05:07, Lee Dengler wrote:
>> I am engraving a piece that has a repeated section. The first ending
>> is
>> very long - about 4.5 systems. I have the beginning bracket for the
>> first
>> ending left open on the right end.
On 20.10.2014 05:07, Lee Dengler wrote:
> I am engraving a piece that has a repeated section. The first ending
> is
> very long - about 4.5 systems. I have the beginning bracket for the
> first
> ending left open on the right end. I have the ending bracket only in
> the
> least measure of the
I am engraving a piece that has a repeated section. The first ending is
very long - about 4.5 systems. I have the beginning bracket for the first
ending left open on the right end. I have the ending bracket only in the
least measure of the first ending. It has the left end open. I tried to
con
On 30 May 2010 at 14:09, John Howell wrote:
> Well, it's certainly something I've never seen. (David Fenton?)
I don't have anything to say that hasn't already been said. It
confuses me greatly, in fact, as the obvious interpretation (repeat
the 2 bars) seems musically less than satisfactory.
At 10:03 AM +0200 5/30/10, dc wrote:
www.collins.lautre.net/files/brace.jpg
How do you interpret this sign? It comes at the end of a chaconne
where the theme is 2x8 measures (D to A, A back to D). As a repeat?
Thanks,
Dennis
Well, it's certainly something I've never seen. (David Fenton?)
I think it means that those two bars are repeated. I've seen this
marking before, though I don't recall in which pieces, but I'm fairly
certain they were keyboard works.
Since it's a chaconne, would repeating those bars greatly distrupt the
ground, or does it serve to prolong the cadence so
Have you checked the repeat settings in Document Options? Not sure if
it involved repeats, but I seem to remember finding a top staff/bottom
staff discrepancy that brought up this sort of problem at some point.
Good luck.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Lawrence David Eden wrote:
> Finale 2K7 M
Finale 2K7 Mac.
What is the correct setting to have 1st and 2nd endings show on the
top staff of my score? I can't seem to make this work? I have made
a staff list that shows TOP STAFF SCORE and ALL STAVES PARTSbut
nothing changes on the screen.
Of course, I also want the endings to show
At 06:29 PM 9/4/2008, Christopher Smith wrote:
>You can fake it, though, using a measure-attached expression. I
>believe the wings are actual characters,
Oh, would that this were true! And it does sort of look like they're
just characters added on to the regular repeat, but I don't see the
char
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:45 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Hi all,
Repeat wing style is set in document options (none, curved, single,
double). Is there any way to override this choice for one linked part?
I've got a score with the 'none' style selected, but for the drum
part, I want curved. I kno
Hi all,
Repeat wing style is set in document options (none, curved, single,
double). Is there any way to override this choice for one linked part?
I've got a score with the 'none' style selected, but for the drum
part, I want curved. I know I can just extract the drum part and
change the sty
On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:38 PM, John Howell wrote:
...The more convoluted your repeat scheme gets, the less likely it
will be intuitive to someone trying to sightread your work. I learned
this lesson the hard way, and ended up wasting MUCH more time in
rehearsal than I saved by using a recursiv
At 2:39 PM +0200 7/17/08, Pierre Bailleul wrote:
Hi all,
A segno sign (s) means to go back to the segno.
Do you think that It's correct to use also a 2 segno sign (ss) to go
back to the same sign?
Thanks for your responses.
Pierre
In place of a single DS? Or as a second DS for a second dal s
I suggest avoiding "D.S.S." if at ALL possible. It always causes extra
rehearsal time and performance difficulty.
Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist
Louisville Orchestra
composer, arranger
dhbailey wrote:
Pierre Bailleul wrote:
Hi all,
A segno sign (s) means to go back to the segno.
Do you thi
Pierre Bailleul wrote:
Hi all,
A segno sign (s) means to go back to the segno.
Do you think that It's correct to use also a 2 segno sign (ss) to go back to the same sign?
Thanks for your responses.
Pierre
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http:/
Hi all,
A segno sign (s) means to go back to the segno.
Do you think that It's correct to use also a 2 segno sign (ss) to go back to
the same sign?
Thanks for your responses.
Pierre
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/l
In new files created in 2008, repeats created with the repeat tool
playback as expected. When entering repeats in the identical way in
older files converted to 2008, I can't seem to find how to get those
same repeats to playback. I think the settings are the same, but I
must be missing so
On 22-Jun-08, at 4:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would use the .. ehh . . jazz repeat sign; dot slash dot to show
"repeat this pattern".
otherwise it would be difficult to use the same bar numbering when
rehearsing.
/ Cb
2008-06-22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your answers, gu
Hey Chris! Thanks for your answer! I already have my notation
established, based on the way Penderecki did similar things years ago.
I've used it several times with the Moravian Philharmonic and there was no
trouble understanding it.
ajr
> I would use the .. ehh . . jazz repeat sign; dot slash
I would use the .. ehh . . jazz repeat sign; dot slash dot to show "repeat
this pattern".
otherwise it would be difficult to use the same bar numbering when rehearsing.
/ Cb
2008-06-22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your answers, guys! I think I found my answer.
>
>ajr
>
>> Create a Staff
Thanks for your answers, guys! I think I found my answer.
ajr
> Create a Staff Style that hides repeat bars and use that to hide the
> repeats on selected staves.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Darcy
> -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Brooklyn, NY
>
>
>
>
> On 21 Jun 2008, at 6:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
Create a Staff Style that hides repeat bars and use that to hide the
repeats on selected staves.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 21 Jun 2008, at 6:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently working on a piece that has some instruments repeating
patterns over a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently working on a piece that has some instruments repeating
patterns over and over again while others proceed metrically. To notate
this involves putting repeat signs on individual lines (these cannot be
placed on all staves of the score), often at different pla
>
> I am currently working on a piece that has some instruments
> repeating patterns over and over again while others proceed
> metrically. To notate this involves putting repeat signs on
> individual lines (these cannot be placed on all staves of the
> score), often at different places. I lo
I am currently working on a piece that has some instruments repeating
patterns over and over again while others proceed metrically. To notate
this involves putting repeat signs on individual lines (these cannot be
placed on all staves of the score), often at different places. I looked
through the m
On May 27, 2008, at 9:25 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
If EVERYONE is not playing the same thing, then the part is NOT
identical in function, even if all the same notes are there. This
might give the player a clue to listen up for something new that might
affect his interpretation. [...]
I
On May 27, 2008, at 10:05 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
I didn't mean to suggest that the parts should be different. I was
only pointing out that useful musical information can be obscured in
doing so.
Fair enough.
C.
___
Finale mailing list
Fina
On 27 May 2008 at 21:25, Christopher Smith wrote:
> On May 27, 2008, at 6:18 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > On 27 May 2008 at 9:20, Christopher Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Robert gives you good advice on how to accomplish it, but I would
> >> like to add my "me too" to those who are exhorting you not
On May 27, 2008, at 6:18 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 27 May 2008 at 9:20, Christopher Smith wrote:
Robert gives you good advice on how to accomplish it, but I would
like to add my "me too" to those who are exhorting you not to do it.
I see only one loss in avoiding the repeats, and that's
On 27 May 2008 at 9:20, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Robert gives you good advice on how to accomplish it, but I would
> like to add my "me too" to those who are exhorting you not to do it.
I see only one loss in avoiding the repeats, and that's that the
analytical aspect of it is absent. That i
Ditto on that. For me, best leave the parts as is. Everytime I have
had to deal with parts not corresponding to scores, it usually ended
up having to spend the first half hour of a rehearsal to remark
things so everyone is on the same thread and even then, there is
always someone who di
You can now do this with a staff stye that will hide the repeat on
the staves where you do not want them to show.
On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:50 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 08.1.23 / 3:16 PM wrote:
I am currently working on a section where individual groups of string
players repe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 08.1.23 / 3:16 PM wrote:
>I am currently working on a section where individual groups of string
>players repeat different patterns until the conductor cuts them off. This
>calls for placing individual repeat signs on several staves, many of which
>don't line up with one another
I am currently working on a section where individual groups of string
players repeat different patterns until the conductor cuts them off. This
calls for placing individual repeat signs on several staves, many of which
don't line up with one another. I looked through the manual to find out
how to d
dc wrote:
I have a piece in C time AA'BB'. My source has both repeat signs for A
in the middle of a measure. Would it make more sense to fill in the last
measure of A to have both repeat signs agree with barlines?
Don't know if I'm stating this clearly.
There is a pickup bar. And then a repea
On 31-Oct-07, at 5:14 PM, dc wrote:
I have a piece in C time AA'BB'. My source has both repeat signs
for A in the middle of a measure. Would it make more sense to fill
in the last measure of A to have both repeat signs agree with
barlines?
Don't know if I'm stating this clearly.
There i
dc wrote:
I have a movement with the following structure:
A B C where B is repeated after C, but with a different final measure.
I was thinking of using a "D.S. al fine" repeat, but how would I
indicate the different ending at then end of B the second time?
Then I'm also wondering if no
At 04:52 PM 3/27/2007, dc wrote:
>I have a movement with the following structure:
>
>A B C where B is repeated after C, but with a different final measure.
>
>I was thinking of using a "D.S. al fine" repeat, but how would I indicate
>the different ending at then end of B the second time?
D.S.
At 10:52 PM +0200 3/27/07, dc wrote:
I have a movement with the following structure:
A B C where B is repeated after C, but with a different final measure.
I was thinking of using a "D.S. al fine" repeat, but how would I
indicate the different ending at then end of B the second time?
Third e
On May 29, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Bill wrote:
The lines that form repeat boxes are not "smart", that is, they keep
the same length regardless of how the music gets spaced, and they do
not break intelligently at system breaks.
Christopher
That's why I always use Custom Line Styles for my Repea
The lines that form repeat boxes are not "smart", that is, they keep the
same length regardless of how the music gets spaced, and they do not break
intelligently at system breaks.
I had a very long first ending over three systems, and I had to manually
adjust the box ends for the
1) first b
On May 29, 2006, at 6:45 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 May 2006 at 11:06, Ken Moore wrote:
"Steve Currington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
The keyboard shortcuts that use
the for example alt or ctrl etc keys and numeric on the laptop do not
work when I try using the USB keypad.
I keep a not
Now that I think more about it I believe what I told you is correct
minus one change all of this can be found in the menu choice
where you change the default music font. I forget what it is called
in the options menu.
___
J. Scott
keith helgesen wrote:
A couple of good folk, Scott Jones & Simon Troup, responded to the query
below- but I think they gave me the answer in Fin2005- I’m still in the
2001 steam age!
Their solution – Options/ Document options/ fonts- fails right there.
Because unless these old eyes
A couple of good folk, Scott Jones & Simon Troup, responded
to the query below- but I think they gave me the answer in Fin2005- I’m
still in the 2001 steam age!
Their solution – Options/ Document options/ fonts-
fails right there. Because unless these old eyes are missing it, I d
>I used to know how to enlarge and make "bold" the numbers in 1st and 2nd
>time bars.
Hi Keith
In 2005b it's ...
Options > Document Options > Fonts > Text > Ending Repeat
... sorry don't have 2001 to hand.
--
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
Real-time Finale discussion - http://www.finaleirc.c
A sure sign of old age! (As well as your tummy making the
same noises as your coffee machine!!)
I used to know
how to enlarge and make “bold” the numbers in 1st and 2nd
time bars.
I’ve looked in all the default fonts and tried anything
and everything that looks vaguely appropriate,
Dear list,
In the case of both a time signature change and a repeat bar (right
facing) between 2 following
measures, Finale automaticaly add the repeat barline after the time
signature change.
Do you know a way to obtain at the end of the first measure a right
facing repeat bar then a time sign
Dear list,
In the case of both a time signature change and a repeat bar (right facing)
between 2 following
measures, Finale automaticaly add the repeat barline after the time
signature change.
Do you know a way to obtain at the end of the first measure a right facing
repeat bar then a time sign
I worked it out.
Johannes
Johannes Gebauer schrieb:
I am trying to set up a complicated repeat:
First Section with 1./2.time bar. Second section. Dal Segno into first
section. Fine in the 1. time bar. Jump to next movement.
I can't get the Fine to work, it just continues repeating the section,
p
I am trying to set up a complicated repeat:
First Section with 1./2.time bar. Second section. Dal Segno into first
section. Fine in the 1. time bar. Jump to next movement.
I can't get the Fine to work, it just continues repeating the section,
playing the second section, goes back into first, rep
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hello,
I don't generally care about playback but a student of mine does, and
I'm having trouble figuring out how to do what he wants.
He has a D.S. al Coda where the jump to the Coda happens *after* a first
ending - second ending repeat. Everything is working fine excep
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hello,
I don't generally care about playback but a student of mine does, and
I'm having trouble figuring out how to do what he wants.
He has a D.S. al Coda where the jump to the Coda happens *after* a
first ending - second ending repeat. Everything is working fine
exce
Hello,
I don't generally care about playback but a student of mine does, and
I'm having trouble figuring out how to do what he wants.
He has a D.S. al Coda where the jump to the Coda happens *after* a
first ending - second ending repeat. Everything is working fine except
that, on the D.S. pass
On Jul 10, 2004, at 2:20 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I sent a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yesterday morning and
there has been no response yet. It might help if you send a bug
report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can see it really is a
problem with some internal aspect of the program, not just the w
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:26 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I just experimented with my suggested solution and I hadn't tried it
yet in 2004 before I suggested it to you -- how odd to have Finale
change the repeat sign to icon C when you select icon B simply because
it realizes you are creatin
On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:26 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I just experimented with my suggested solution and I hadn't tried it
yet in 2004 before I suggested it to you -- how odd to have Finale
change the repeat sign to icon C when you select icon B simply because
it realizes you are creating a complete first
On Jul 9, 2004, at 3:30 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I went to check out that setting for back hook length, since I don't
like them most of the time, and to my shock and horror found that it
IS set to zero! But, every time I place an ending, there IS a back
hook.
Wow, that's mighty strange. Maybe it's
At 1:49 AM -0700 7/09/04, Mark D Lew wrote:
(If the back hook length isn't zero by default in the templates,
then I agree that's sort of silly, since more often than not you
won't want a back hook, and it's easier to add one than get rid of
one. But if so, that's a flaw of the templates, not th
>...I hate it when
>programs don't do what I tell them to do, as if they are smarter than I
>or that I don't have the right to do things differently than their
>narrow programming paradigms have predicted.
>
>So if you don't want the two brackets (or the appearance of having two
>brackets, or t
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:56 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
If you want to manually adjust, lets say, the right hook, dragging it's
handle to one side will not drag the other bracket's handle, so, the
overlapping is not always guaranteed.
The overlapping of the horizontal line always w
Giovanni Andreani wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:31 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
This is what i get on my Mac with Fin 2k4c:
1. Only icon B selected: two dots with double bar and no bracket
2. Only icon D selected: a single bracket with editable text
3. Selecting B first then D: a double bracket app
On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:56 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
If you want to manually adjust, lets say, the right hook, dragging it's
handle to one side will not drag the other bracket's handle, so, the
overlapping is not always guaranteed.
The overlapping of the horizontal line always works. The vertical
>On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:31 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
>
>> This is what i get on my Mac with Fin 2k4c:
>>
>> 1. Only icon B selected: two dots with double bar and no bracket
>> 2. Only icon D selected: a single bracket with editable text
>> 3. Selecting B first then D: a double bracket appears, wi
On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:31 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
This is what i get on my Mac with Fin 2k4c:
1. Only icon B selected: two dots with double bar and no bracket
2. Only icon D selected: a single bracket with editable text
3. Selecting B first then D: a double bracket appears, with the right
brack
>To do what you want (i.e. just have the left bracket with the number)
>you'll need to enter two repeats in the same measure:
>
>1) the two dots with double bar (not with a bracket over it)
>2) the opening bracket as you would to indicate the start of the second
>ending.
>
>David
David,
By sel
Giovanni Andreani wrote:
Sorry, I'll try to explain myself a little better: when creating a
repeat
measure, that can have graphic and playback effect assigned to it:
graphically, you get a bracket with editable text (usually the 1st,
2nd, n-nd time number). The bracket created is really made of tw
To do what you want (i.e. just have the left bracket with the number)
you'll need to enter two repeats in the same measure:
1) the two dots with double bar (not with a bracket over it)
2) the opening bracket as you would to indicate the start of the second
ending.
David
Giovanni Andreani wrote
>> Sorry, I'll try to explain myself a little better: when creating a repeat
>> measure, that can have graphic and playback effect assigned to it:
>> graphically, you get a bracket with editable text (usually the 1st,
>> 2nd, n-nd time number). The bracket created is really made of two
>> brackets,
On Thursday, July 8, 2004, at 06:06 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:23 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
When displaying repeat bars with first and second endings, the
brackets
over these measures are multiple, and if one tries to delete one
bracket
wanting to preserve just one simpl
Giovanni Andreani wrote:
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:23 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
When displaying repeat bars with first and second endings, the brackets
over these measures are multiple, and if one tries to delete one
bracket
wanting to preserve just one simple line bracket, the whole repeat
measure
>On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:23 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
>
>> When displaying repeat bars with first and second endings, the brackets
>> over these measures are multiple, and if one tries to delete one
>> bracket
>> wanting to preserve just one simple line bracket, the whole repeat
>> measure gets de
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:23 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
When displaying repeat bars with first and second endings, the brackets
over these measures are multiple, and if one tries to delete one
bracket
wanting to preserve just one simple line bracket, the whole repeat
measure gets deleted. Is there an
When displaying repeat bars with first and second endings, the brackets
over these measures are multiple, and if one tries to delete one bracket
wanting to preserve just one simple line bracket, the whole repeat
measure gets deleted. Is there anyway to avoid this problem?
Thanks
Giovanni Andreani
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Repeat sign in 17th-century editions
> David W. Fenton écrit:
> >You said 1640, right? Is it a tempo marking (a variant spelling of
> >adagio)?
>
> Yes, a tempo marking meaning "adagi
On 2 Jun 2004 at 22:10, d. collins wrote:
> David W. Fenton écrit:
> >Also, another
> >oddity is the word "ada??o" above the beginning of the Alleluia.
> >Nothing is coming to mind on that at the moment (it clearly doesn't
> >belong to the text of the line above it).
>
> adasio
>
> It also appe
On 2 Jun 2004 at 20:48, d. collins wrote:
> David W. Fenton écrit:
> >But that does not mean that we absolutely know that Dennis's source
> >is part of the same tradition -- Johannes may be drawing on practices
> >in a repertory that are wholly irrelevant.
>
> First of all, I want to thank all of
d. collins wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
But that does not mean that we absolutely know that Dennis's source
is part of the same tradition -- Johannes may be drawing on practices
in a repertory that are wholly irrelevant.
First of all, I want to thank all of you who replied to my query -
David,
On 02.06.2004 1:50 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
>> Yes, but Johannes is not evaluating in the abstract. He's evaluating
>> based on comparison with similar markings in a large sample of other
>> scores of the same era.
>
> But that does not mean that we absolutely know that Dennis's source
> is pa
On 02.06.2004 1:34 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
>> I repeat, I am assuming there is no error. And yes, I know my stuff.
>
> There *is* an error -- in the interpetation of the meaning of :||: --
> you are saying that it doesn't mean the same thing in these sources
> as it does in modern editions.
S
On 1 Jun 2004 at 16:42, Mark D Lew wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:42 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > In the abstract, I just don't think there's any way to make any such
> > determination with any certainty.
>
> Yes, but Johannes is not evaluating in the abstract. He's evaluating
> based on
On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:42 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
In the abstract, I just don't think there's any way to make any such
determination with any certainty.
Yes, but Johannes is not evaluating in the abstract. He's evaluating
based on comparison with similar markings in a large sample of other
scor
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
