On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Phil Battle <bat...@advr-inc.com> wrote:
> Ok, below works as I would expect ( note Dx and Dz are constants)
Thanks for that. I can confirm that it's broken in Python 2.7 as well
when the diffusion coefficient is [[Dx, Dy]].
--
Danie
k 2 for the diffusion coefficient. It's safer to do that for
anisotropy.
> I see questions posted on this list, Gist and stack overflow - is there a
> preference for posting ?
I prefer Stackoverflow, but depends on the nature of the question.
Stackoverflow isn't good for very o
>>> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> fipy mailing list
>>>>>> fipy@nist.gov
>>>>>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>>>>> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> fipy mailing list
>>>>> fipy@nist.gov
>>>>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>>>> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> fipy mailing list
>>>> fipy@nist.gov
>>>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>>> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> fipy mailing list
>>>
>>> fipy@nist.gov
>>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>>>
>>> [ NIST internal ONLY:
>>> https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy
>>> ]
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> fipy mailing list
>> fipy@nist.gov
>> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
>> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
>
>
> ___
> fipy mailing list
> fipy@nist.gov
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
> [ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
on exactly overlaps with the analytical solution only if I do
>>> S_vap_analytical.setValue(Mf / (xalt*vgas(xalt))) #with xalt
>>> defined below in my code
>
> instead of
>
>>> S_vap_analytical.setValue(Mf / (x*vgas(x)))
Probably the same deal.
--
Daniel Wheeler
_
erLaw== DiffusionTerm(coeff=D, var=c) +alpha
> * n -
> c/tau;
eq3 = TransientTerm(var=c) == DiffusionTerm(coeff=D, var=c) +
ImplicitSourceTerm(coeff=alpha, var=n) - ImplicitSourceTerm(var=c,
coeff=1. / tau)
Remember that the `v` needs to be updated by `vx` and `vy` explicitly.
I hope that helps
s b
>
> I went through the manual and spent several hours on past discussions on the
> mailing-list, but I could not find, yet a working solution.
>
> Your help would be greatly appreciated.
> Best,
>
> Hervé
>
> ---
> Hervé Turlier, PhD
> European Molecular Biolo
1. 2. ]
[ 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 2. 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5]]
In [5]: velocity[0] = 0.0
In [6]: print velocity
[[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ]
[ 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 2. 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5]]
--
Daniel Wheeler
_
oeff = velocityVector.faceValue))
>
> eq.solve(var = phi)
>
> viewer.plot()
>
> ----
>
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best,
>
> Zhekai
>
>
>
> ___
> fi
t would be great to have
in FiPy. Sorry that it isn't available.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
n unstructured mesh, but always proceed with
caution creating small test cases as you go to confirm.
Good luck with it.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
to anyone who has developer experience with FiPy
to discuss my implentations to keep them in line of the structure of the
FiPy project/code.
Let's set up a video chat with Jon Guyer included. Email me offline
and we can set up a time.
--
Daniel Wheeler
including source terms with the correct masks for the faces
rather than using constraints.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
optimizing unless you really
know Trilinos well IMO.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
something customized then things
should work right.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
for the equations being solved, see
http://materialsinnovation.github.io/pymks/rst/elasticity_2D.html#elastostatics-equations
Hope that helps.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal
in FiPy
until we at least have basic coupled elasticity examples. Thanks.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
(since the cell center gradients are calculated from the cell center
values). Arguably, setting a faceGrad constraint should influence the
extrapolation, but it doesn't currently.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy
://github.com/usnistgov/fipy/blob/develop/fipy/meshes/gmshMesh.py#L149
and find out what gmshVersion is. I suspect it's None or something
like that and Gmsh is not even being found. I often use the
Interactive Python Debugger for this sort of thing and it's a great
help.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel
is not that great at pure hyperbolic problems, but you can try to
use the VanLeerAdvectionTerm to preserve the shocks better. See
https://gist.github.com/wd15/22d739ee506f5ebf07eb.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov
v.getGrad()[:,0]
[[ 0.5 1. 0.5 0.5 1. 0.5 0.5 1. 0.5]
[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ]]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman
-linear iterations.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
the derivatives unless P has n dependence so
Riemann does nothing.
I probably need to see how your implementing things to be more helpful.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https
to import the results into Mathematica. You can just
use viewer = fipy.Viewer(phi); viewer.plot() to look at the results.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https
it would be a huge issue to make it work correctly. Just a
case of carving out some time to do it. Feel free to submit an issue
outlining your use case, see https://github.com/usnistgov/fipy/issues.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
can't get that working. Please do get
back to me if you can't get this working.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
of parameters or equation and for a more general equation or parameters we
would see a difference? I'd like the test to reflect the change in some way
if possible. Have a test that failed for the old wrong solution and passed
for your new solution.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
.
I'm beginning to wonder if we shouldn't switch all boundary condition to
source terms and do away with constraints because they obfuscate what's
going on. I need to think about it.
I hope the example helps.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy
with FiPy and
Python 3 that we need to address.
Good luck.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
are
into HPC.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
to determine that
Trilinos is actually the issue and not something else.
Also, are you certain you are running in parallel. This has caught me out
before. Print fipy.parallelComm.procID, also print mpi4py version of
procID and Epetra's version Epetra.PyComm().MyPID().
--
Daniel Wheeler
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Raymond Smith smit...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi, Fipy.
I just noticed that when I click on the mailing list archive links at
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/MAIL.html
Thanks for the heads up, it should work now.
--
Daniel Wheeler
internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
://gist.github.com/wd15/f59005909801df9dd38b
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Daniel Wheeler daniel.wheel...@gmail.com
wrote:
You could make those changes to your code or pull in the particular commit.
Rather than changing your code you can use the viewer's axis attribute to
set the limits.
viewer.axes.ylim(ymax=3)
for example
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal
trying to implement. More importantly, how are they
different from those covered in the examples and usage documentation, such
that you're not sure how to proceed?
Yun, is there an answer to this question?
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy
if you can and see if FiPy is closer.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
script (as simplified as possible) with the expected
result we could look at it and see if there is anything obvious.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman
, 0.12720232,
0.58384755])
Point being that it is fairly easy to extract the values from FiPy fields
and set the Sfepy field at the given locations (to first order accuracy).
Of course you still need the reverse mapping, but I imagine there is a way
to to do that with SfePy.
Hope that helps.
--
Daniel
having. I don't currently have a good solution for long term
data storage.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
on grid refinement using Gmsh, which involved reading and writing
msh files, but I don't think that it has been merged into the main
development branch yet. Sorry that I can't be more helpful.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy
]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
try and get that fixed.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
to the
desktop machine. I'm enclosing an example file with nx=100 and ny=10,
written on the cluster.
Cheers,
Bill
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov
.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
. Maybe at the Scipy conference next year or
elsewhere.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
) and would be something that I could possibly participate
in.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
the
output numbers directly for each field with sourceCoeff on and off
and see.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
for the feedback.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
. I'll try and revisit this in the future when/if I
create an elasticity example for FiPy.
Sorry that I can't be more helpful.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https
that add directly to the equations. Constraints
are not that sophisticated.
How this is implemented depends on the equations you are solving and
which equation the boundary condition is applied so you'll need to
supply some more details.
--
Daniel Wheeler
an equation for U, would that be
eqnhelper = ImplicitSourceTerm(1, var=U) == M1*P0
Or am I making things too complicated now.
This doesn't help since you still have an explicit representation for
M1 and P0 in one of the equations.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
, as
shown in the attached file.
You probably just need to reshape the arrays properly.
Any chance you could cut and paste the whole code or subset that runs
and produces the error so I can reproduce the error on my computer
(and not as an image preferably)?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
by zero, which are probably not important. It worked with both
the master and develop branches of FiPy. Go ahead and update to
3.1 from http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/download/ or clone the
repository with git clone git://code.matforge.org/nist/fipy.git.
Good luck.
--
Daniel Wheeler
.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
Does anyone have an example of solving the stress / strain equations
using FiPy that they would like to share?
I am trying to solve them with a materials parameters, but anything
would do to get started.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy
as the
coefficient in the cells adjacent to the boundary. I can't really do
this without seeing the full set of equations though. If you can
supply those then maybe I could code something.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http
?
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
then it might lead to the wrong field values
if it is calculated incorrectly
* check that the solver is converging in parallel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https
git documentation, here: http://www.antichipotle.com/git/)
Very amusing. Did you tweet that?
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
than trying to construct
MyConvectionTerm.old().
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
?
No. If the .msh file is already available, the Gmsh3D class shouldn't
make any more calls to Gmsh.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
for that specific class/class method?
$ python fipy/matrices/pysparseMatrix.py -v
will run your tests in verbose mode so you can see it is actually being tested.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST
= fp.Gmsh3D(geoFile)
mx,my,mz = mesh.getCellCenters()
print mx
Going forward, it would be nice to automate this. Probably always
reset tempdir in parallel just to be safe.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http
the names of the 4 nodes that were allocated (I believe I didn't have 32
processes on one node).
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Wheeler
daniel.wheel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, there is a workaround, which I will send to you offline.
The workaround: https://gist.github.com/wd15/9693712
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy
of
contributors. You could just push your changes to a public repository
(Github for example) and then I can pull from there.
Thanks.
BTW We will be switching to Github soon, which will make this process
much easier.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
and check that it at least works for me or try and
debug it.
Thanks.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
) only one of the
nodes has busy cores.
Hi Bill,
I think that the first step is to confirm that Trilinos is working
correctly independent of FiPy. To do this just run
from PyTrilinos import Epetra
print Epetra.PyComm().MyPID()
in a script. Does this work on more than one node?
--
Daniel
to joining
the equations and solving with a single matrix. The dependence on A* in the
second equation is in the integral so there is no easy to get tighter
coupling than by simply using alternating solutions of the equations
separately (Peclet iteration).
--
Daniel Wheeler
inline: tblatex-1.pnginline
up. It uses Sumatra
to record the simulations and then port the records into Pandas. It's
a more sophisticated way to record the simulations.
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/wd15/smt-demo/blob/master/demo.ipynb
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing
in 1979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1
I hope that's correct.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
into using FiPy in parallel a little bit more, just with a
very simple problem in 3D. The results are in two IPython notebooks.
See
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/wd15/fipy-efficiency/tree/master/notebooks/
Parallel efficiency is anything between 0.25 and 0.6 for 48 processes.
--
Daniel
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Caleb Hattingh
caleb.hatti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 February 2014 01:48, Daniel Wheeler daniel.wheel...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your time.
Thanks for all the feedback and good luck with your work.
--
Daniel Wheeler
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Caleb Hattingh
caleb.hatti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 February 2014 02:25, Daniel Wheeler daniel.wheel...@gmail.com wrote:
And this continues all the way down into the bottom right-hand
corner such that J[nx,nx] * dx^2 is again -3. I found this by using
say that
FiPy is working on your system. Which version of Gmsh is installed?
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
you on this, but I know that others have used FiPy in
this way.
If you just want the numerical Jacobian, I would guess that Trilinos
can do this.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY
of a solution problem and expensive independent of the
size of the domain. Once the domain is scaled up a lot of this
overhead becomes inconsequential.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:57 PM, sunghyun Kim kimsungh...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
thank you so much!
It's been merged to the develop branch now. So use
$ git clone git://code.matforge.org/nist/fipy.git
$ cd fipy
$ git checkout develop
--
Daniel Wheeler
, this should be easy to implement. I'll file a ticket and see
if I can get something working.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Daniel Wheeler
daniel.wheel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:24 AM, sunghyun Kim kimsungh...@kaist.ac.kr wrote:
Hi.
I have found PeriodicGrid1D or PeriodicGrid2D meshes.
However, it seems there is no way to use 3D periodic boundary condition
.
Sorry that I can't implement this right now.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
cmd --help
error:invalid command 'egg_info'
Not sure what is going on there. Try
$ python
import fipy
fipy.test()
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https
the top and bottom of the mesh. The left-right
overlaps already work being on the same processor since the
partitioning is only along the y-axis.
Hope that helps.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
performance as it is partitions in an optimal way using Gmsh. The
partitions for Grid3D are suboptimal slices. The Grid3D class in
parallel is a proof of concept as much as anything.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http
array. Also you can always get the
array value by simply forcing with numpy.array(b * c), which
removing any vestiges of FiPy from the object.
There may be a good reason to make the assignment, but it might also
indicate that there is a better way.
--
Daniel Wheeler
from
$ python -c import fipy; fipy.test()
Thanks.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
)
print eqn.matrix
This is a mixture of both the stiffness and mass matrices.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
than VC on the whole if that counts
for anything
Sorry I can't be more specific.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
a solution to the problem of how to specify
coefficients.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
-averaged discretized $\psi$'s. I don't believe that FiPy has
any inbuilt functionality to do this.
Hope that helps or at least clarifies things a bit.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY
of
parallel under windows?
Unfortunately not. Jon is currently working on implementing PETC as a
backend solver, maybe this will be better on Windows.
Good luck.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST
seem to find any Windows specific installation instructions at
Sandia, but I found these
http://hillyuan.blogspot.com/2013/02/build-trilinos-in-windows-by-visual.html
Will compiling the trilinos code using cygwin work?
Not tried that either. Sorry.
--
Daniel Wheeler
also decreases.
solve version http://pastebin.com/sBQj7knw
I created a notebook with some pointers about how to reformulate the
equations so they are mostly implicit. I believe this is possible with
your equations.
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/gist/wd15/8043375
--
Daniel Wheeler
order
diffusion terms and coupled equations can't be trusted.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
,
which is the tool I'm currently using to solve coverage equations for
catalysts. So making that connection was very helpful too!
Harry Moffat? Maybe the wrong Moffat. I coauthor papers with someone
called Tom Moffat. No connection with Harry.
--
Daniel Wheeler
and things should work.
--
Daniel Wheeler
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
[ NIST internal ONLY: https://email.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/fipy ]
101 - 200 of 628 matches
Mail list logo