Ippool assigns duplicate ip address

hi i'm a newbie with freeradius. I'm managing a FreeRadius 0.9 box and i'm trying to solve a problem. On this box the ippool is configured, but it gives duplicate ips. I'm trying to understand if it's always or just sometimes. Anyway, it seems that rebooting freeradiu

Re[6]: ippool issue

Hello Paul, Sunday, November 2, 2003, 9:49:54 AM, you wrote: >> From: Alexander Lunyov >> Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 6:32 AM >> Thursday, October 30, 2003, 6:52:58 AM, you wrote: >> rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: mynas.domain.ru/17 >> rlm_ippool: Allocating ip to nas/port

RE: Re[4]: ippool issue

> From: Alexander Lunyov > Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 6:32 AM > Thursday, October 30, 2003, 6:52:58 AM, you wrote: > rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: mynas.domain.ru/17 > rlm_ippool: Allocating ip to nas/port: mynas.domain.ru/17 > rlm_ippool: num: 1 > rlm_ippool: Allocated ip

Re[4]: ippool issue

Hello Paul, Thursday, October 30, 2003, 6:52:58 AM, you wrote: >> rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: zeus.domain.ru/61 >> modcall[post-auth]: module "main_pool" returns noop for request 0 PH> The only NOOP between these two lines is the one that checks if you've PH> already got a

Two questions about ippool

Hello everybody: We have up un running freeradius 0.9.2 with rlm_ippool and rlm_sql (MySQL). We want to use the same server to do the accounting too. We have a Nortel CVX 1800 with a L2TP tunnel against a ASN Bay Networks router. 1.- The ASN doesn't pass the nas port information

RE: Re[2]: ippool issue

> From: Alexander Lunyov > Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:14 PM > What do you mean? NAS in the same logical network or radius server in the > same logical network? > For example, i want this ippool working with NAS. > > ippool main_pool {

Re: Re[2]: ippool issue

e you can. > GAL> But if you do that you cant get routed to any place. > > GAL> You need a gateway address within the same logical network. > > What do you mean? NAS in the same logical network or radius server in the > same logical network? > >

Re[2]: ippool issue

er in the same logical network? For example, i want this ippool working with NAS. ippool main_pool { range-start = 192.168.253.1 range-stop = 192.168.253.254 netmask = 255.255.0.0 cache-size = 800 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

Re: ippool issue

Sure you can. But if you do that you cant get routed to any place. You need a gateway address within the same logical network. On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:29, Alexander Lunyov wrote: > Hello freeradius-users, > > Is there a possibility to pool range of IP addresses for NAS > while NAS

ippool issue

Hello freeradius-users, Is there a possibility to pool range of IP addresses for NAS while NAS is not in that range? For example, if i try to pool 192.168.253.0/24 network for NAS with address 192.168.3.3 - it says that nas/port not found for that NAS address (192.168.3.3).

Huntgroups and IPPOOL allocation based on NAS Request

Hi Currently attempting to set-up multiple ippools, which are correctly assigned due to the NAS making the request. --start huntgroups- llgcis01-hunt NAS-IP-Address == 127.0.0.1 btsurf01-hunt NAS-IP-Address == 10.1.1.100 ---end huntgroups ---start users D

RE: ippool - several subnets

he simplest way to accomodate this? The simplest way would be have two pool instances, and set override=no. _I_ would suggest a grouping of two ippool instances where a NOOP result gets failed over, and any other result is returned immediately... And with override=no set. See doc/configurable-failove

ippool - several subnets

Hello, could someone help me figure out this: I want to create one large IP-pool consisting of several subnets (not neccessary sequenced), and then distribute IP-addresses to all my clients from this pool (i.e. 1.2.3.0/24 + 1.2.10.0/22) What would be the simplest way to accomodate this? -- Me

Re: rlm-ippool not deallocating ip addresses

deallocation on rlm-ippool. > > I have a pool defined in radiusd.conf : > > ippool private_pool { > > range-start = 172.16.4.1 > range-stop = 172.16.4.254 > netmask = 255.255.255.0 > cache-size = 5000 &g

RE: rlm-ippool not deallocating ip addresses

From: Mohsen Chirara Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2003 7:40 PM > Hi, I installed freeradius version 9. pre-1 (just before the > version 9 was released) on a debian system. > Everything is working fine except for the deallocation on rlm-ippool. > The problem is after a day or 2, no mor

rlm-ippool not deallocating ip addresses

Hi, I installed freeradius version 9. pre-1 (just before the version 9 was released) on a debian system.   Everything is working fine except for the deallocation on rlm-ippool.   I have a pool defined in radiusd.conf :   ippool private_pool {       range-start = 172.16.4.1

patch: Caller Id not stored in ippool files

Hello all (TGiF!): Not yet assimilated the rlm_ippool pseudo-code Paul posted (I haven't spent much time with it either), but I solved a little flaw in rlm_ippool. While dumping the contents of the files (so to trace "the strange case of disappearing IPs"), I noticed that no caller ids were store

ippool error next!

We make lot of test i can now explain one thing This is the test killall radiusd rm -f /var/log/radius/radacct/db.ippool /var/log/radius/radacct/db.ipindex radiusd ./test_cree.sh ./test_free.sh /usr/bin/iptool /var/log/radius/radacct/db.ippool /var/log/radius/radacct/db.ipindex -v | wc the fina

Re: ippool-tool

we found > > > out that our IP-Pool is running out of free addresses. Most likely > > > because of the way we get packets in combination with the way our > > > dialin-service is handled. > > > > There was a problem in versions older than 1.12 (cvs revision

Re: ippool-tool

Most likely > > because of the way we get packets in combination with the way our > > dialin-service is handled. > > There was a problem in versions older than 1.12 (cvs revision) of the ippool > module. > The module will free an ip address when it receives an accounting-sto

RE: ippool-tool

. > > > Javier. > > > -Mensaje original- > De: Kostas Kalevras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2003 13:20 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: ippool-tool > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > Greeti

RE: ippool-tool

Hello, What problem did you find in versions older than 1.12?? I cannot access web cvs.. ¿?¿? Javier. -Mensaje original- De: Kostas Kalevras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2003 13:20 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: ippool-tool On Sun, 9 Mar

Re: ippool-tool

alin-service is handled. There was a problem in versions older than 1.12 (cvs revision) of the ippool module. The module will free an ip address when it receives an accounting-stop for an active nas/port combination or an access-request for the same combination. So normally it should not run out o

ippool-tool

Greetings, In the past three months or so since we've used FreeRadius we found out that our IP-Pool is running out of free addresses. Most likely because of the way we get packets in combination with the way our dialin-service is handled. To monitor and overcome this problem, I've written a small

IPPOOL PROBLEM

Hello All, I have a problem with rlm_ippool module It doesn't give ip addresses... :( This is my radiusd.conf: modules { .. ippool ippool { name = ippool range-start = 194.69.25

IPPOOL configuration on freeradius-0.7.1

Sir/Madam I have downloaded and installed freeradius-0.7.1 on a linux system It is all working except I am having trouble - allocating IP address dynamically it is my believe this is done using ippool which is where my problem is. I can't seem to set up ippool successfully. Do I ne

Re: IPPool problem, again. (Kostas Kalevras)

> It was fixed today. Check the CVS. It needed a memset(0) for key.nas > before the strcpy(). > I can confirm that now it works. Thanx alot Pigi - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: IPPool problem, again.

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Pierluigi Frullani wrote: > Do you remember my previuos mails ? > > Hi all, > > I' m having problem with the Ippool module ( rlm_ippool ). > > When authorizing, the module is able to allocate the correct IP > > address, but on the account

IPPool problem, again.

Do you remember my previuos mails ? > Hi all, > I' m having problem with the Ippool module ( rlm_ippool ). > When authorizing, the module is able to allocate the correct IP > address, but on the account "Stop" does not set the ip free. ... Well, I did some more investig

Re: Ippool problem on 0.7.1.Don't deallocate ip addresses

Ok, I reply to my self. I' ve noticed that the NAS ( a VPN 3000 Concentrator ) sends out two different authorize request, on two different ports ( 1020 and 1038 in my trace ) then when gives out a stop request will use the second request parameters. The rlm_ippoll module, correctly check for the se

Ippool problem on 0.7.1.Don't deallocate ip addresses

Hi all, I' m having problem with the Ippool module ( rlm_ippool ). When authorizing, the module is able to allocate the correct IP address, but on the account "Stop" does not set the ip free. relevant part of radiusd.conf ... ... modules { ... ... ippool Prova0 {

Re: Ippool

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:45:51 +0300 (EEST) Kostas Kalevras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not sure that you can do group membership checks with the pam > module. Try using the unix module for that (just put it in the > instantiate section to register it's groupcmp function). That w

Re[2]: ippool bug or config problem?

Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 7:29:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> ippool assign the same ip address for two different users. >> May be my config is broken? >> When i use large pool (1-254), i have the same bug

Re: ippool bug or config problem?

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ippool assign the same ip address for two different users. > May be my config is broken? > When i use large pool (1-254), i have the same bug after restarting > radiusd. > - Now I try send auth pac

ippool bug or config problem?

ippool assign the same ip address for two different users. May be my config is broken? When i use large pool (1-254), i have the same bug after restarting radiusd. - radiusd.conf modules { ippool ippool-1-fast { range-start = 192.168.5.1

Re: Ippool

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:45:51 +0300 (EEST) Kostas Kalevras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure that you can do group membership checks with the pam > module. Try using the unix module for that (just put it in the > instantiate section to register it's groupcmp function). I'll give

Re: Ippool

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Homer Parker wrote: > Having a bit of a time getting an Orinoco AS-2000 to get an ip address > from the ippool module.. I authenticate just fine, it just falls through > the users file to the dial-up stuff before it gets a match... Here's some > info:

Re: Ippool

On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:02:45 -0500 Homer Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having a bit of a time getting an Orinoco AS-2000 to get an ip > address > from the ippool module.. I authenticate just fine, it just falls through > the users file to the dial-up stuf

Ippool

Having a bit of a time getting an Orinoco AS-2000 to get an ip address from the ippool module.. I authenticate just fine, it just falls through the users file to the dial-up stuff before it gets a match... Here's some info: DEFAULT NAS-IP-Address == 172.16.1.8, Auth-Type := Pam,

ippool : dealocation problem

Hi, I´m using freeradius 0.5+cvs20020408-1 in my debian box. Checking my logs ippool tell me it´s clear the ip address from your db, but I create one pool with 3 ip addresses, when I connect on the 4 time ippol doesn´t return any ip for me. My NAS send

IPPOOL modified to use SQL...

If anyone interested, i modified rlm_ippool.c to work with SQL. This code was made to solve my problem, I needed Ippool to work (it worked, but wasn’t releasing ip for some reason) and I needed a database that I could access From the web. This code will NOT work with other method for

RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kostas Kalevras Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses. On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote: >> Forgot to mention

RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote: > Forgot to mention, I am running radiusd -X > radius.log > Stupid question. Is the ippool module listed in the accounting section in radiusd.conf? The accounting packet should be an accounting stop for a nas/port combination that has an all

RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kostas Kalevras Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses. On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote: >> Okay one more t

RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote: > Okay one more thing I got now from the logs. Right now I have rm -rf the > db* > And restarted radiusd, a (cmd: cat radius.log | grep "= Stop" | wc -l) > reports 66 stop's, but I don't see a "rlm_ippool: Deallocated entry for > ip/port:" not even one i

RE: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kostas Kalevras Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses. On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote

Re: IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Abel Alejandro wrote: > IPPOOL seems that it cannot give all the ip addresses on the range, > it starts giving addresses but if there are 50 ip's it only gives 10. Hmm, from what i tested right now it will give out all the ips. > > FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE r

IPPOOL is not giving all the ip addresses.

IPPOOL seems that it cannot give all the ip addresses on the range, it starts giving addresses but if there are 50 ip's it only gives 10. FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE running Freeradius from of 19/05/02 (cvs). ippool arecibo { session-db = ${dbdir}/arecibo.db

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

In article <00a101c1fd56$61050be0$b800a8c0@kelvindell>, Echo FreeRadius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >For example we are in the process of putting in 4 Nortel CVX 1800's with >1288 lines each all in one large roll over (5152 lines) in the GTA (Greater >Toronto Area) > >From those 4 CVX's we are goin

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

"Echo FreeRadius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example we are in the process of putting in 4 Nortel CVX 1800's with > 1288 lines each all in one large roll over (5152 lines) in the GTA (Greater > Toronto Area) > > >From those 4 CVX's we are going to provide wholesale dialup port for 4 - 10 >

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

ernet Inc. http://www.eol.ca - Original Message - From: "Simon Allard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: RE: Using ippool with two radius servers? > > > > Ah, you only have one terminal se

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

c routing. > > Okay, you have a fixed pool assigned to each NAS. I still fail to see > why you don't want the NAS to each handle the assignment of their own > pools? But then what the heck do I know about building a big network... I have the same requirment (ippool over multip

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

At 04:58 PM 5/16/2002 -0300, Gelson Dias Santos wrote: > > From: Miquel van Smoorenburg > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Ah, you only have one terminal server with 30.000 ports on it? > > In that case, route the /17 to that NAS and be done with it. > > But you likely

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

Title: RE: Using ippool with two radius servers? > From: Miquel van Smoorenburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Why should I have 30.000 host routes > > Well, you're talking about 30.000 ports. If you are going to > assign each of them an IP address usi

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gelson Dias Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Miquel van Smoorenburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> >Yes, I kown I can have 'N' different ip pools >> configured, one for >> >each NAS , but I'm talking about 30.000 dial p

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

Title: RE: Using ippool with two radius servers? > -Original Message- > From: Chris Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]   > > Is there a way to syncronize the ip databases > between two (or > > more) radius servers when using module ippool? If no

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

Gelson Dias Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back to the original question; can I have two Radius server managing > the same IP address pool? It's difficult. Both RADIUS servers have to be kep in PERFECT synchronization, otherwise duplicate IP's are assigned. Your best bet may be t

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

At 05:28 PM 5/15/2002 -0300, Gelson Dias Santos wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Miquel van Smoorenburg > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Yes, I kown I can have 'N' different ip pools > > configured, one for > > >each NAS , but I'm talking about 3

RE: Using ippool with two radius servers?

Title: RE: Using ippool with two radius servers? > -Original Message- > From: Miquel van Smoorenburg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Yes, I kown I can have 'N' different ip pools > configured, one for > >each NAS , but I'm talking ab

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gelson Dias Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to syncronize the ip databases between two (or more) >radius servers when using module ippool? If not, how do we avoid giving the >same ip to two users at the same t

Re: Using ippool with two radius servers?

At 03:51 PM 5/15/2002 -0300, Gelson Dias Santos wrote: > Is there a way to syncronize the ip databases between two (or > more) radius servers when using module ippool? If not, how do we avoid > giving the same ip to two users at the same time if the primay and > secondary

Using ippool with two radius servers?

Title: Using ippool with two radius servers?     Is there a way to syncronize the ip databases between two (or more) radius servers when using module ippool? If not, how do we avoid giving the same ip to two users at the same time if the primay and secondary radius does not share infop

Re: IPPOOL

On Fri, 10 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > Guys; > > Every so often I need to reboot the server because the system accepts the > requests, authenticates the users, but it doesn't assign anymore addresses. > > The client dies as ppp cannot complete. > > > Any suggestions > > > Be

Re: IPPOOL

Guys; Every so often I need to reboot the server because the system accepts the requests, authenticates the users, but it doesn't assign anymore addresses. The client dies as ppp cannot complete. Any suggestions Ben

Re: IPPOOL

On Tue, 7 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > #0 0xfef706a0 in exit () from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-60/lib/libc_psr.so.1 > #1 0x397f4 in ippool_authorize (instance=0x12e748, request=0x821bfb8) at > rlm_ippool.c:495 > #2 0x1fb54 in call_modsingle (component=4, sp=0x12e4a0, request=0x821bfb8, > defau

Re: IPPOOL

request_handler_thread (arg=0x821bd38) at threads.c:172 - Original Message - From: "Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:04 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > > > Nope guys the real

Re: IPPOOL

On Tue, 7 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > Nope guys the real output from the core could not be read. The earlier > results were NOT from the core, we get: > > # crash core > dumpfile = core, namelist = /dev/ksyms, outfile = stdout > crash: core is not a kernel core file (bad magic number 7f454c46)

Re: IPPOOL

, May 07, 2002 7:36 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > here is some of the usual crash output. I would like to help > as much as i can to get this resolved. > > Ben > > > > stat > system name:SunOS > release:5.8 > node name: radius > version:

Re: IPPOOL

here is some of the usual crash output. I would like to help as much as i can to get this resolved. Ben > stat system name:SunOS release:5.8 node name: radius version:Generic_108528-13 machine name: sun4u time of crash: Tue May 7 10:38:39 2002 age of

Re: IPPOOL

I have the core.. It is 139mb which is what I had left of memory, what can we do now? - Original Message - From: "Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:23 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On Mon, 6 May 2002, B

Re: IPPOOL

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > Acct-Status-Type = Stop > NAS-Identifier = "Arecibo" > Attr-172818435 = "01002D41D706939B" > Service-Type = Framed-User > NAS-Port = 16387 > NAS-Port-Type = Async > Class = 0x653934 > Calle

Re: IPPOOL

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > We fixed an issue that we had with accounting and the daemon ran ok for a > bit, but then it crashed with a segmentation fault. > > The only way that we were able to bring it up was by cleaning all the .db > files but we are sure that this is not the right

IPPOOL

We fixed an issue that we had with accounting and the daemon ran ok for a bit, but then it crashed with a segmentation fault. The only way that we were able to bring it up was by cleaning all the .db files but we are sure that this is not the right way to get this fixed. Any ideas/suggestions???

Re: IPPOOL

From: "Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:33 PM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > > > psss... i thought it worked but > > > > somethin

Re: IPPOOL

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > psss... i thought it worked but > > something weird, > > Seems that people connect, and disconnect, but the ip's from the people that > disconnect do not become available for reuse??? > > Can you guys check that? > >

Re: IPPOOL

At 05:33 PM 5/6/2002 -0300, Gelson Dias Santos wrote: > >> we have tried various things but cannot get it to give addresses based on > >> the nas identifier. what are we doing wrong? > > > >That's not the idea behind the ip_pool module. The idea is to assign > ip's from > >the same pool to all t

Re: IPPOOL

Title: Re: IPPOOL >> we have tried various things but cannot get it to give addresses based on >> the nas identifier. what are we doing wrong? > >That's not the idea behind the ip_pool module. The idea is to assign ip's from >the same pool to all the access se

Re: IPPOOL

uot;Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:25 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On Sun, 5 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > > > we downloaded what we thought was the latest prior to making > > it.. > > >

Re: IPPOOL

On Sun, 5 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > we downloaded what we thought was the latest prior to making > it.. > > we did > > a) downloaded and installed the cvs application (1.11.2) > b) and executed a download with it!! > > any suggestions which file to check to see if we did NOT get t

Re: IPPOOL

: "Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 5:52 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On Sat, 4 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > > > also, > > > > I get this error now. > > > > > > Modul

Re: IPPOOL

gt; Ben You will have to upgrade to the latest cvs if you are using freeradius 0.5. Now what do I mean with an instance for each nas server: ippool nas1 { session-db = "manati.db" ip-index = "nas1.db" range-start = 196.12.162.1 range-st

Re: IPPOOL

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:17 PM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > Ok, but what do you mean by this? > > > create one instance of the ippool module for each nas > > > Ben > - Original Message - > From: "Kostas Kalevras

Re: IPPOOL

Ok, but what do you mean by this? > create one instance of the ippool module for each nas Ben - Original Message - From: "Kostas Kalevras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 9:54 AM Subject: Re: IPPOOL > On

Re: IPPOOL

On Fri, 3 May 2002, Ben Casado wrote: > This is what we have did to the radiusd.conf file. With this we only get > addresses form that range, and that is not what we want. > > === > ippool { > session-db = "manati.db"

IPPOOL

We have a question about the ippools,we have this in the radiusd.conf: ippool {    session-db = "${confdir}/ippool.db"    ip-index =  "manati"    range-start = 196.12.162.65   

Re: IPPOOL

At 09:20 PM 5/2/2002 -0400, Ben Casado wrote: >We are trying to configure our radius to give out the addresses instead of >the comm servers. For that we have downloaded the software and compiled it >with the rlm_ippool. > >Can someone direct us to what we need to do next? Configure rlm_ippool a

Re: IPPOOL

"Ben Casado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are trying to configure our radius to give out the addresses instead = > of the comm servers. For that we have downloaded the software and = > compiled it with the rlm_ippool. > > Can someone direct us to what we need to do next? Run it in debugging

Re: IPPOOL

This is what we have did to the radiusd.conf file. With this we only get addresses form that range, and that is not what we want. === ippool { session-db = "manati.db" ip-index = 196.12.162.64 range-start = 196

Re: IPPOOL

> Thanks in advanced, > > > Ben Read the comments in radiusd.conf for the ippool module? They are quite descriptive of what you need to do. -- Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Technical University of Athens, Greece Work Phone:

IPPOOL

We are trying to configure our radius to give out the addresses instead of the comm servers. For that we have downloaded the software and compiled it with the rlm_ippool.   Can someone direct us to what we need to do next?     Thanks in advanced,     Ben