Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
I think you could use 4.1.0 in Fedora Core 5. Since patch level
shouldn't really affect the C++ compilation restrictions, the same patch
should break on 4.1.0 as well.
Gregory, I've looked at harmony-1635.patch you've uploaded to HARMONY-1635,
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
As fun as this discussion is, it's all theoretical.
There's no harm in a bit of fun :-)
So how about we create a sandbox in SVN and copy over a few types to
mark-up while Etienne is developing the processor, and we can all watch
that evolve
Put them in as JIRAs
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Below is a list of isolated development tasks which do not require
advanced knowledge of VM and could be a nice start for newbies to get
acquainted with the code. All items are targeted for better code
sharing.
1) Eliminate duplicate implementation
Nice - buy why not put the tasks in JIRA?
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Thanks all who helped with the what can we do now page - the new page is shorter but none the less useful.
My suggestion is to add more links to the page. It now only links to the applist. More candidates: classlib status page
I love working with the English. What is the colour of the 'zed'
before the fullstop?
Mark Hindess wrote:
While checking and applying some of Ilya's patches for
internationalisation, I noticed that there were quite a few messages
that end with a fullstop. Aside from the inconsistency (which
Any chance you give your magic commit powers another spin and put the
committer list in alphabetical order, by last name (a - zed) :)
geir
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Apologies for the lack of commit message - in the excitement
of adding myself to the list of committers I clicked ok a little
too
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/2, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Put them in as JIRAs
Done: HARMONY-2051, 2052, 2053.
Thanks - that just makes it easy for people to grab them and get going...
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Below is a list of isolated development tasks which do
I was going to start organizing the infrastructure transition to TLP.
On the list are :
1) website goes to http://harmony.apache.org/;
2) mail lists become
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc. This will be transparent - we'll move subscribers over, and I
suppose we forward @incubator traffic to
Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
yeah - someone generate, and we can hang them on the website. I'm
not sure we'd want to check them in though...
Is it possible to add documents into website but not to commit them
in SVN?
Yep. I
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/2, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was going to start organizing the infrastructure transition to TLP.
On the list are :
1) website goes to http://harmony.apache.org/;
2) mail lists become
And harmony-commits will become [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why not use junit?
Junit task in implicitly assumes that you can
run all tests in single JVM instance. Though it does provide
fork-mode to run tests in separate JVM processes, it still
does not allow per-test JVM args configuration.
Which
Why not?
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:50 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][swing] compatibility:
j.s.text.GapContent.replace()
behaviour
HARMONY-1975is
, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we all agree that it's not an ideal solution.
Can anyone think of anything else? No one said this was going to be
easy...
geir
--
Sian January
IBM Java Technology Centre, UK
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why not use junit?
If you mean why not use junit to loop over tests, then it is not the
case. I've used junit to do this in my work.
The loop which I wrote here is the loop over components in the build.xml
of drlvm. If you run build
on Java 6 (as we're going to do it at some point) and
work from there.
geir
Thanks,
Sian
On 02/11/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sian January wrote:
I may be totally off track here, but how about just having two copies
of all
:
On the 0x215 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/2, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Put them in as JIRAs
Done: HARMONY-2051, 2052, 2053.
Thanks - that just makes it easy for people to grab them and get
going...
maybe, put the list of JIRAs on wiki
name=test depends=test_loop, test.jvmti /
:)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Why not use junit?
If you mean why not use junit to loop over tests, then it is not the
case. I've used junit to do this in my work.
The loop which I wrote
Sian January wrote:
On 02/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sian January wrote:
I believe that in CVS when you make a branch there's nothing in it to
begin with, so if you check out code from the branch it looks the same
as code in head. Then if a change is made
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I was going to start organizing the infrastructure transition to TLP. On
the list are :
[SNIP]
I agree that we are still drawing value from all talking on the same
channel, so let's keep it that way for now.
I can't think of any other infra
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[...]
See, I'm hoping for something a tad different :
1) For building : process() (and revert() for fun) for cmd line use for
the build scripts, so we just do
...
2) For development : IDE plugin where
a) I can tell plugin that my
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
[SNIP]
Such changes are usually not dealt with very neatly with svn merge.
I'm confused. I don't think anyone has suggested that we use svn
merge for this.
Now, if using the processign tool, you get at least 2 benefits over svn
merge:
1- No need to do any svn
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir
I actually was serious. Probably you were confused, I didn't write
build test, I wrote build smoke.test. The first one works ok, the
second doesn't.
It happens because test (top-level test target
to it.
--
Ivan
On 11/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch?
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The communication aspect of 2 can be quite helpful when doing
system-wide changes. Just think about the effect of simply doing a
system-wide reindentation of source code; this is a nightmare when
developing using branches, as diff/merge tools
BTW, I'm more than happy if you just do a quick sketch of what you're
thinking, and we resume the convo from there.
I just wanted to clear up some confusion I had.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The communication aspect of 2 can be quite
. It
will be fun to play with.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The communication aspect of 2 can be quite helpful when doing
system-wide changes. Just think about the effect of simply doing a
system-wide
did we ever bottom out on what range of GCC we'll support?
I have a patch I want to commit that is known to not compile under 4.1.1...
geir
Nice! Post it on the wiki?
Leo Li wrote:
Hi, all:
Harmony now has been able to pass 100% testcases on Tomcat5.5. I ran
them both on WindowsXP and Unbuntu, with J9 VM and drlvm.
The detailed information about how to build and run tests have been
put on
This is about Motorola and their efforts in the ME ecosystem. The
Apache style of open governance has shown itself to be very successful
in creating good software, although there are other models that are
successful as well (Eclipse Foundation, MySQL). So seeing Motorola
embrace that, as
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Thanks Rana!
If you ask me what would I like, the answer is quite simple: as a windows
developer primary (today) I would recommend to other windows developers to
use msvc build (with patch from
HARMONY-1990http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1990
).
With this
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
What's the concern about just using the prescribed branching pattern
for SVN? There are some other nice tricks like externals for pulling
in common files into the working copies of other branches (ala the
'concurrent' code
Is this tuff documented? Wanna throw it in the wiki or a patch for the
site?
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x214 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
+ Some usage hints:
1. You can get any stylesheet editor (like Excel), open iprof data and build
graphs from the colums - and you will have
Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
Hi, I am using port_CPUs_number() for GCv5 to get the processor
number, but my desktop returns one processor with it on Windows
although my processor is dual-core. (port_CPUs_number is defined in
port_sysinfo.h).
I think we need more general form of processor number
Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top,
could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there?
geir
Leo Li wrote:
Yes, I have posted it on http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Tomcat.:)
On 11/1/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
This is about Motorola and their efforts in the ME ecosystem. The
Apache style of open governance has shown itself to be very successful
in creating good software, although there are other models that are
successful as well (Eclipse Foundation, MySQL). So seeing
Anton Luht wrote:
Alexei,
2. If I suggested an enhancement, this would be an addition of a test
name filter for comparison results. I mean that if I'm interested in
Bidi tests comparison, I put Bidi into form field (name=Bidi) and see a
comparison for the tests which names contain the
yeah - someone generate, and we can hang them on the website. I'm not
sure we'd want to check them in though...
I've done this before for API docs...
geir
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Having these docs on website will be really good!
SY, Alexey
2006/11/1, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you
yay!
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
Hi All,
DRLVM now builds and run (interpreter mode) on IPF with HARMONY-2004.
The patch should cause no changes on other architectures.
Currently, in interpreter mode everything works fine but GC. GC fails.
I'm investigating this issue.
Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch?
geir
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There's caching too, I think. LogCache4J
What I meant was that it didn't seem like we came to a conclusion on it
- that if we had a general pre-processing solution, we could use that
too for logging, rather than have two.
The actual use-cases
Yah, that was my point. Glad to know it was already there.
geir
Paulex Yang wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Great! Does anything link to that page? IOW, if I started at the top,
could I find the page using some reasonable path to get there?
Front Page
done
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
Folks,
Some minor typos were discovered in the Execution Manager Component
Description. In cooperation with Mikhail Fursov we've created a couple of necessary
patches [http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2036].
Would be great, if someone can find a
Paulex Yang wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
yeah - someone generate, and we can hang them on the website. I'm not
sure we'd want to check them in though...
Is it possible to add documents into website but not to commit them in
SVN?
Yep. I was thinking the same for the Doxygen docs
that's because you haven't been added to the svn perms. I'll do that in
a bit...
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:28 Tim Ellison wrote:
Hurray!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: apetrenko
Date: Tue Oct 31 06:57:44 2006
New Revision: 469512
URL:
done.
-Nathan
[1] http://antenna.sourceforge.net/#preprocess
[2] http://www.netbeans.org/kb/50/quickstart-mobility.html
On 11/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There's caching too, I think. LogCache4J
What I meant
added perms for gregory, oliver, richard and alexei for svn and jira
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
that's because you haven't been added to the svn perms. I'll do that in
a bit...
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:28 Tim Ellison wrote:
Hurray!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
What are the reasons to exclude the most standard solution here: branching.
Do you think we need a lot of them?
I don't think we are excluding any option for maintaining similar code
streams (5.0 6.0, SE ME, etc.) it's just a discussion at the
, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 October 2006 at 18:38, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilya Neverov wrote:
Hello,
I want to gather opinions about structure of the jdktools
component.
I'm going to create scripts for moving tools' sources from classlib
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:28 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] Preprocessor
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
What are the reasons to exclude the most standard solution
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Geir,
What are the reasons to exclude the most standard solution here: branching.
Do you think we need a lot of them?
Because I'm not sure how you can easily maintain fixes and general
coherence across branches.
Also, there are 3 use cases for pre-processor, and it
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
Nadya,
AFAIU the given page is purely classlib-oriented...though I might be
wrong here.
It provides info on how to set up Eclipse to develop Java code in
Harmony and IMHO doesn't include any tips applying to harmony code in
general.
I absolutely agree with you
oh, thankyou thankyou thankyou
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Yeah! No problem, I was just thinking a zip would not look as
transparent and safe. I'd turn the images from the other doc issue into
an archive as well.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/31/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that if we could get 5.0 complete, we'd could *then* branch for
6, but I don't think we'd want to serialize like that.
I understand the dilemma. If we agree to have
or ant.scripts also sound not so bad. Why not to choose the
less confusing name?
(I believe you meant make or make.platform)
What projects? Java projects?
With best regards,
2006/10/31, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why? I'm really curious about this. We build the project, using
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Yes, the main reason I love Java is a power of tools! If you force me to
work in notepad instead of IDEA with the only reason that we need a
preprocessor I will have a doubt if the solution is reasonable.
Agreed. And that is a reason why it makes
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/31/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can have pointcuts on a whole number of events, including method
invocations but also exception handling, field assignments and accesses,
etc. But you can only add behavior, you cannot subtract from the
original
,
generated docs and etc.
Regards,
2006/10/31, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Take me for example. I will be most likely misleaded with build
since the majority of projects I've seen in my life were using build
or build.platform for storing build artifacts (as Mark
/documentation.html].
What do you say?
If you do not mind, I can try to update the doc.
Best regards,
Svetlana
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:18 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [build
'build' is more ambiguous.
Currently we have build system with many 'make/' dirs so it probably
bettre to postpone the move to new name to some moment of
restructuring the whole build system. I think today it's better to
keep consistency.
Thanks
-Ilya
On 10/31/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
Yes, the main reason I love Java is a power of tools! If you force me to
work in notepad instead of IDEA with the only reason that we need a
preprocessor I will have a doubt if the solution is reasonable
ICLA should be faxed to the number on the document ASQ can be sent scanned
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
However, it would be great if you had an ICLA and ACQ on file to save
you the trouble of typing this in the future :) Better living through
paperwork!
OK; I should
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Right, but you (Mr Harmony developer) don't modify the 'processed code',
you work in the 'code w/ preprocessor statements', so you probably want
the code you are modifying to be real, compilable Java code too.
Agreed, but I
Tim Ellison wrote:
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
4. I vote for one of the following renamings:
a) Rename ibm tag to j9
b) Rename drl tag to intel :-).
That looks like a strange suggestion to me. I think the tags are fine
as they are. What is you thinking?
Indeed... DRL is Apache
that the logging
problems have been resolved w/ aspects yet...)
geir
-Nathan
On 10/31/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we all agree that it's not an ideal solution.
Can anyone think of anything else? No one said this was going to be
easy...
geir
Nathan Beyer wrote:
On 10/31/06, Mark Hindess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 October 2006 at 7:24, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Take me for example. I will be most likely misleaded with build
since the majority of projects I've seen in my life
code. The point here is to find a harmless way of
letting people do it if they want to for classlib development ...
geir
-Nathan
On 10/31/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/31/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
IMO it's not ideal that the preprocessed source still contains all the
streams, albeit in comments. It wouldn't make the source very
'consumable' to the Mrs. SE or ME developer.
Hmmm... It's always possible to have a special output mode that puts
Sian January wrote:
I'm actually not sure if that first page is up to date or not (
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/dev_eclipse.html).
I think it should be but I have not ever been able to get it to work
myself. Can anyone else confirm whether it is still in
cool!
Tim Ellison wrote:
I thought it would be fun to see what a Windows installer would look
like for Harmony.
So this morning, just for kicks, I was playing with NSIS
(http://nsis.sourceforge.net/) and produced a prototype installer very
easily (kudos to them). I'll put the source for it
] Code
smell -
Thread.sleep() in ActivationGroup method)
On 10/29/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The Logging Debate That Won't Die - we don't want to encumber our
production code with logging or even with runtime enablement checks
for logging i.e
can one of you JIT nerds describe for us non-JIT-nerds what value
profiling is? :)
geir
Yuri Kashnikoff wrote:
Hi!
I'am working on value-profiling implementation. Implementation in EM
is alredy avaible. Now I'am trying to implement and use it in JIT. I
can answer any questions about current
Are IBM's and Sun's are know to work well for production loads?
Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
Weldon, the problem is, there is no well-established parallel
compaction algorithms. So far the best known work are 1. SUN's work;
2. IBM's work and 3. Compressor. No one knows which one is the best
for
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello
JVMTI implementation is quite a big piece of drlvm code which doesn't have any
tests that are ran regularly. This may create regressions in JVMTI
implementation which won't be caught early. So I want to add several small
tests for JVMTI which would cover most
.
I don't understand this - what do you see as the real problem?
Interruption from select due to signals is a fact of life under linux.
geir
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
there will be a home for the JDWP code, which has beed
voted but still resides in JIRA. Working with SVN will be easier.
Thanks.
-Ilya
On 10/4/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, that's the plan. And once we have that, we can simplify the
launcher as well...
Tim Ellison wrote:
+1
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 00:24 Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
Gregory wrote,
I need is probably smoke tests category. I need to add building native
code
part and add a custom command line setting somewhere.
+1
I believe you need one or two test with a good coverage
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:27 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
So I should either create a new 4th category for tests with custom build
file, or extend one of the current categories which we have. The most
close to what I need is probably smoke tests category. I need
is there any chance you could put a zip of the images into the jira,
rather than a dozen or so images? That's actually what turned me off
from one of the other doc issues - I said to myself oh, heck, I don't
want to download each of those separate thingies... I just want a zip or
tgz of
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
At the same time I don't feel completely comfortable with the idea
of using preprocessor to separate J2SE sources from J2ME.
I'm not overjoyed either, but I can't think of many ways that allow
fairly clear readability
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
can one of you JIT nerds describe for us non-JIT-nerds what value
profiling is? :)
Maybe calling people nerds was a disincentive ;-)
I hope not - it's a compliment. :)
Value profiling means watching the actual values of variables
Alex Blewitt wrote:
On 28/10/06, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a hoot -- it now seems to have mutated into all of SE being
available by Christmas :-)
Ho ho ho.
Not gonna happen...
geir
Alex.
Can we discuss using a preprocessor?
We have a couple of good reasons to consider it :
1) The Logging Debate That Won't Die - we don't want to encumber our
production code with logging or even with runtime enablement checks
for logging i.e.
if (logging.isDebugEnabled())
but it's
r468731
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Any blocking issues? otherwise I suggest we roll a new snapshot this
weekend. It has been a while.
Sure - I've been meaning to do this for a while.
I was just looking over what was left to put in DRLVM-wise.
I realize that Mark
Alexey had a thread on this about 2 weeks ago. The patches he mentioned
have been applied.
When doing app testing with the latest snapshot, jEdit 4.3 pre6, I was
happy to see the installer complete (still missing html support, I guess)
But when I tried to run on WinXP, I got :
java -jar
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Geir,
I've just returned from Egypt. Red sea is warm and fishes are amazing! :)
I'll check this tomorrow.
BTW I've used stable build...
What is a stable build?
SY, Alexey
2006/10/29, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey had a thread on this about 2
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/29/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The Logging Debate That Won't Die - we don't want to encumber our
production code with logging or even with runtime enablement checks
for logging i.e
oh! LOL
I thought you meant some stable version of Harmony :)
Thanks
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
http://jedit.org/index.php?page=download
There are two versions: development and stable.
2006/10/29, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Geir,
I've just returned from
doh!
(fixed)
Tim Ellison wrote:
permissions!
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
r468731
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Any blocking issues? otherwise I suggest we roll a new snapshot this
weekend. It has been a while.
Sure - I've been meaning to do this for a while.
I was just
and a bunch of SwingSet
demos. Good stuff.
Where do you get the demos? I think it would be nice to have our own
set of demos in the JDK
geir
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
doh!
(fixed)
Tim Ellison wrote:
permissions!
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
r468731
Geir Magnusson Jr
Thanks!
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I've committed an initial DOAP file for the Harmony project in SVN
[1]. The DOAP file is for the Apache Projects site [2], check out the
site for more information. The file is loaded via HTTP from any URL,
so any updates made to the file in SVN will be directly
Chris Gray wrote:
On Sunday 29 October 2006 14:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[...]
3) Java ME - We've had some interest (Chris?) in looking at using the
Harmony classlib for ME, which can also have some differences that might
be most conveniently kept in place in the main codebase.
Yes, I'm
there was a tag in doug's CVS for the version that was put
into java 1.5 from sun?
geir
I'll have to look into what I changed in the test file, if that's needed.
ack.
Regards,
Tim
On 10/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do. All,as Tim said, we don't do mods to j.u.c
geir
understanding is javac, hotspot, and ME class libraries by end-2006,
and SE class libraries (modulo some encumbered parts) in 2007.
Regards,
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Well, they announced the time frame last august, saying that they'd have
javac and hotspot out by the end of 2006.
Now, maybe
There was a problem with the repo restore, so things are current only up
to end of august :(
I've asked yoko to either do a new release or put a copy back (we'd want
them to do that).
I've put a copy of my
depends/jars/yoko-m1
directory on
Please do. All,as Tim said, we don't do mods to j.u.c
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
Why do two files in standard concurrent code have the standard ASF
comment blocks?
modules/concurrent/standard/src/main/java/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap.java
Nice. And how about with DRLVM? :)
Tony Wu wrote:
sure, coming soon
On 10/27/06, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Wu wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to run the unit tests of apache axis on harmony+IBMVM and got
this result[1]. It looks not bad. I will update the detail on wiki.
to be committed or what?
Thanks,
Pavel
On 10/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with almost as much joy as being able to report TLP that I report
that patch available now works.
First, all thanks to David Belvins. I had been able to set the patch
available field in the default
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
Folks,
I see that we do need one more building doc describing Eclipse
specifics.
The main doc containing building instructions now is the Getting
Started for Contributors page.
[http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/quickhelp_contributors.html].
My suggestion is
While you're at it, I'd like to get this patches in, but we probably
need a new target for building, as running normally with this framework
compiled in leads to problems.
Can we find a way to make it a different build target, or at least a flag
-Dwith.jitrino.test.framework
or something?
To whom did Hiram send this?
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hey,
Just wanted to let you guys know that I tried running ActiveMQ using
the Harmony JVM and here are the results:
Harmon: latest from tonight
Platform: Linux SUSE 10
ActiveMQ: 4.0.2 RC6
Using default config it
201 - 300 of 2755 matches
Mail list logo
