fused_layers.executor
Line 24:
Result=%prefix%_blended_fused.tif
blended_stacks.executor
Line 24:
Result=%prefix%_fused.tif
Could you change these lines to single letter _b and _f
Result=%prefix%_b.tif
Result=%prefix%_f.tif
or allow user defined suffixes (as variables).
When merging images mul
If replacing _blended_fused and _fused to _b and _f is impossible in the
software code,
I am trying to write a command line cleaner for Hugin files.
Go from the base folder, through all subfolders,
1. Delete all *.mk and *.log files
2. Rename all _blended_fused in filenames to _b
3. Rename all _fu
Thanks a lot for the option to
*Ignore the color spaces* (profiles)
The ICC profiles were relicts of misunderstanding between human eyes
(everyone sees different colors)
and imperfections of machine sensors.
This useful option will save a lot of time, drive space and abusing inhuman
words.
Th
Selective blending of variants of the same image. All images are the same
size.
I do:
Load images, set projection to reclilinear, reset positions.
No control points, no calculations, no alignment.
Selective masking out and in.
Saving new versions by blending stacks.
Stitcher -> Calculate size ->
working*. :)
[image: hugin_expects_to_convert_almost_a_million_images.png]
On Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 5:10:34 PM UTC+2 Luís Henrique Camargo Quiroz
wrote:
>
>Hi Abrimaal,
>
>Just to tell that I use a color calibrated monitor, and also have
> calibrated a few other monitors (none of them CTRs), and I know by
>
Color profiles "I will not pass" - it seems to be a cardinal error. Now not
only in .jpg, it also appears in .tif images.
All these color profiles were developed in the times of CRT monitors and
early digital cameras, that had problems with displaying proper colours,
especially blue tones.
Today
2021 at 4:24:22 PM UTC+1 Abrimaal wrote:
> I think I understand it, although not everything.
> Sometimes panoramas (especially taken in HDR - stacks of 3 photos with
> various exposures) look like this - there are lighter and darker areas in
> the sky at the stitching edges.
> I th
Recently I was editing EXIF data of a .jpg file for the first time, because
I had to change the date.
If Hugin still takes so much care for color space and it will not pass,
even if I beg (there is no "open anyway").
I think about batch removing the color space from a few hundred thousands
of .j
"Fine tune all points" is usable. I often make two versions of the same
panorama, with and without Fine tune.
It is often visible on the preview, that the panorama layout changes after
fine tuning.
When adding control points manually, a human selects the most sharp edges
and the highest contrast
Yes, we the photographers and graphic artist work and think in graphic
mode, while the programmers work with numbers.
This causes a lot of misunderstanding between the developers "it is
working" and the users "it is missing".
Initially Hugin was intended to be a graphic editor, dedicated for
pho
Yes, sure. These are only 3 images. You are great if you find control
points on the *white background* *of Hugin*.
Normally, when viewing in full screen I see where I should add the points.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/j6q7l01z8gb3d7g/20210127+fullmoon.7z/file
On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 at
No changes since 2017. I am so sorry. I see it will be easier for me to buy
5 new hard drives, convert about a million photos to .png and continue the
work.
What does the sequence -ca-pah-2s_fd-cp-ph2c_bf-h-mk-b mean?
This is the order of edits of a single photo. The photo has been processed
in
It was strange that Windows (or any other system) allowed to use "*" in a
folder name. Even if the folder was imported from a 1980s computer ;)
Well, work with a computer is not writing poetry.
The best to use only the standarized 26 letters and digits. We really do
not need any other character
Yes, you can, but the problem is in projections.
Instead of such presets as "equirectangular, architectural, mercator,
cylindrical" I would make two sliders for proportional vertical
compression.
One slider for tops, the other one for bottoms, with "stop" points at these
presets.
The cylindri
This is common with multiplane panoramas. You can delete control points at
the bottom and optimize (or align) again.
The objects closer to the camera are sharper, this is why the detector
mainly places control points on the objects near you.
No worries, you can delete all points on trees and ro
: output_bf12345678901.png]
On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 6:10:31 AM UTC+2 Abrimaal wrote:
> First maybe without the source code if I need to install almost a new
> system to change one constant.
>
> I have searched for "_blended_fused" string in the *hugin_version_number\bin
gt; that will change the hugin GUI so that when clicking the Stitch! button
> with fused and blend settings, it'll use your modified version, or if
> you'll need to recompile for that. But this here will get you going.
>
> Have a great day.
>
> On Tuesday, September 15,
the system colour scheme to software that don't follow
the system settings.
On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 9:08:13 AM UTC+2 Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Abrimaal writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > The dark background is just a modification of the image
quot; or "skip photometry adjustment". I think it should be
included in Optional Steps.
So, only *Reset photometric* parameters or* Reset user defined* (exposure
and/or color) is usable.
On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 4:41:32 PM UTC+2 Abrimaal wrote:
> Yes. *Straighten* adjusts
random, as loaded and the position must be
reset manually?
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 6:19:01 AM UTC+2 GnomeNomad wrote:
> On 9/15/20 12:11 PM, Abrimaal wrote:
> > I always pressed "Align" after loading all images. Align also affects
> > photometrics, so I try
I always pressed "Align" after loading all images. Align also affects
photometrics, so I try to make a panorama using the Editor only.
What step have I skipped?
1. Mark the middle image "for position"
2. Find control points + Celeste and vertical lines
3. Fine tune all points
4. Calculate and op
Are the suffixes generated by hugin.exe or one of the co-apps?
I could try to recomplile from source, just tell me in which file are the
suffixes defined.
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 12:46:40 AM UTC+2 Abrimaal wrote:
> What files should I modify to shorten the _blended_fused and _fu
What files should I modify to shorten the _blended_fused and _fused
suffixes to *_bf *and *_fd* ?
Multiple stitching of panoramas and making collages creates extremely long
filenames.
Then automatic renaming that obviously doesn't rename contents of .pto
files, if a file with _blended_fused s
ation the camera is still pointing along the same parallel path.
>
> D Johnston
> On May 25, 2020, at 2:25 a.m., Abrimaal >
> wrote:
>>
>> Why not X,Y,Z? Before using Hugin I did not know what yawn meant.
>>
>> On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 6:54:01 AM UTC+2, Gn
I am trying to *stabilize* short video sequences to the *moving object*.
Trying to stabilize video this way, that the *moving object* is always *in
the middle* of the video - it can be a human, a car, anything in distance.
This method ignores the background by *exclude masks *and/or finds contr
Why not X,Y,Z? Before using Hugin I did not know what yawn meant.
On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 6:54:01 AM UTC+2, GnomeNomad wrote:
>
> In the "yaw, pitch, roll" world, wouldn't this be pitch?
>
> On 5/24/20 4:59 PM, Donald Johnston wrote:
> > Vertical shift sounds more like what a camera on an ele
PT Batcher is freezing not only your Mac, it makes Windows inoperable too.
With every new task the PT Batcher icon pops the taskbar up, and I cannot
access the tools at the bottom of the screen. When working with many
programs at once it becomes a horror, to click and hide the terrible icon
eve
About the panorama example:
Yes, the control points at the horizon are most important here. The
detector finds control points on the ground, because the details are sharp
and high contrast.
Before running the detector, mask out (exclude) the bottom parts
(especially the tree). You can leave onl
The temporary folder is emptied at exit, you can change its location in
Preferences -> Filenames -> Temporary dir
Saving projects in the same folder as the images is the best option ever.
Believe me, if you had one folder for projects, after creating 5000
projects you would never find it.
On T
Today not about panoramas. About blending various versions of the same
photo.
I open 3 versions of the same photo - all of them are the same size, for
example 3000x2000 px
I reset positions and use inclusive masks to select the best parts of each
version.
There are no control points, because al
Maybe it will be useful to do it in two steps.
Load the final panorama to Hugin (as a single image) and change the field
of view.
This is a 360° panorama with HFOV changed to 20° I think it will work in
both ways.
On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 12:00:10 PM UTC+1, ChameleonScales wrote:
>
> I ha
gt; I have no idea how hard 1 is, and 2 would need some testing to see how
> viable it is.
>
> --
> Bruno
>
>
> On 19 March 2020 23:20:07 GMT, Abrimaal wrote:
> >Once there was only RGB, CMYK and grayscale and nobody took care about
> >color spaces and profile
This is an example of straightening a single photo (but it also refers to a
sequence of images and there are more lines)
I open an image.
Rotate it 90°
Run vertical line detector to detect horizontal lines.
All the horizontal lines are detected as vertical lines, what is correct.
*Now I would
Once there was only RGB, CMYK and grayscale and nobody took care about
color spaces and profiles. What happened that today we have so many color
profiles, and they apply only to .jpg format?
I process photos in various editors, each of them saves .jpg with a color
profile. Some editors, especial
Thanks a lot for "check if still exist and delete again" temporary .tif
files, when the same folder was open in another image viewer.
Will it be difficult to add "Open file location" to the batch processor
right-click menu? When right clicking on a project from the task list, the
folder with the
A little offtopic, but I am interested. I downloaded Meshroom. What can I
do in this?
Can I load a series of photos to create a 3D model?
I tried everything, nothing worked. Started from loading a photo.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_F
The vertical and horizontal lines are used for calculating a good looking
panorama. The distance is important to avoid errors in calculations.
The V lines should be distant as far as possible, at least two near the
edges of a panorama, to calculate and straighten the view.
When there are lines
that.
> Thanks,
> /Jud
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019, 10:27 AM Abrimaal >
> wrote:
>
>> 1. Check the control points, any image with any. The detector often fails
>> with scanned images. Check the vertical lines, they are often added on the
>> edges of
1. Check the control points, any image with any. The detector often fails
with scanned images. Check the vertical lines, they are often added on the
edges of photos. The best to add all control points manually.
2. Set a different lens number to every image - 0,1,2,3...
3. Mask out (exclude) the i
I see no differences.
Not much has changed in the new versions (Windows) since 2016, when
straightening single photos was introduced (thankful I am for this mode,
the only introduced feature from my suggestions).
Thanks also for enabling image preview in "Open"
Thanks for "Cancel" when calculatin
It's simpler to use Include masks.
Include the whole text of the left page on the left image
and the whole text of the right page on the right image.
| [ text text text ] | [part of
| [ include mask] | [right page
| [ on whole text ] | [no need to
| [ of left page ] | [exclude
No nee
s only for selected images.png]
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 12:39:56 AM UTC+2, Erik Krause wrote:
>
> Am 10.09.2019 um 03:16 schrieb Abrimaal:
>
> > I selected image 6 to find points between image 6 and ALL the rest
> > 6+0, 6+1, 6+2, 6+3, 6+4, 6+5 but NOT between 1+2,
e
> could easily spot the zinger control point that should not be or edge
> matchings that would skew a stitch.
>
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 10:32 AM, Abrimaal > wrote:
>
> I added one more image to an existing panorama. Now I want to find control
> points only for this image (no. 6
I added one more image to an existing panorama. Now I want to find control
points only for this image (no. 6) , it means
6 and 0
6 and 1
6 and 2
6 and 3
6 and 4
6 and 5
vertical line detection only for image 6
When I select image 6 and right click, there is no "Find control points"
for this imag
I think it was a Batch Processor error, because I could save a project and
close Hugin, but could not close BP.
The message window was empty and not responsive to clicks. I closed BP with
Task manager.
When I opened the saved project in Hugin again, the panorama was stitched
normally.
[image:
> 1. I Load Images (easy), then set Projection to Cylindrical.
> 2. I run Align;
Hugin will not remember the selected projection when you click [ Align ],
because the simple Align automatically selects projection, based on the
field of view.
You might not notice this, because cylindrical is the
The horizon looks very good, the trees are straight and the hills naturally
curved.
I see that the sky colors don't look natural.
This has been caused by the automatic exposure and white balance
correction.
When you use "Align" button, the exposures and WB are adjusted, but they
rather adjust
They are selected images from the Explorer, dragged and dropped from
Explorer to Hugin, or sent to Hugin from Windows Explorer or other
application. (for Windows).
Btw: the component applications of Hugin can be run from command line with
parameters. I am also interested where to find the list o
Excellent. I always forget that I can manually modify X Y Z positions.
On Monday, March 18, 2019 at 8:14:41 AM UTC+1, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17 March 2019 19:35:01 GMT, Abrimaal wrote:
> >
> >Creating a multiview pano is possible on a 2D screen, but except a l
Theory, raw theory. When stitching 40 panoramas daily, every second counts.
"Add images" already opens Windows explorer, a second Explorer window will only
take space on the screen and it will not follow the current work folder.
I started to write a command line script to get filenames from .pt
25, 2019 at 10:51:32 PM UTC+1, Bart van Andel wrote:
>
> Abrimaal wrote:
>>
>> It does not work in the 2019 beta 2 version, because the filter "All
>> files" has been changed to "All images".
>>
>
> Sorry, apparently I missed this. BTW I think 2
've been served already a while ago ;-)
>
> On Thursday, 21 February 2019 17:56:51 UTC+1, Abrimaal wrote:
>>
>> Please at least allow to display All files in the Load images window.
>> This way panoramas that must be quickly corrected can be sent to another
>> instance
his file field already contains an
> option for showing "All files (*)", both in Hugin 2018.0.0 and the current
> 2019.0.0. I think we can conclude you've been served already a while ago ;-)
>
> On Thursday, 21 February 2019 17:56:51 UTC+1, Abrimaal wrote:
>>
>
Please at least allow to display All files in the Load images window.
This way panoramas that must be quickly corrected can be sent to another
instance of Hugin
Right click .pto file -> Send to -> Hugin.
Btw. filtering images by extension is not the best method, it excludes
images without exten
y, February 4, 2019 at 3:48:33 PM UTC+1, Abrimaal wrote:
>
> [image: hugin-could-not-decode-image-from-pto-file.png]
> While loading images from a .pto file, this error message is displayed.
> The images have not been moved, not renamed, the are still in the same
> folder as the .
Although the default installation folder in Windows is "C:\Program Files",
it is not recommended to install any third party software on C:, except
drivers, codecs, fonts and other shared files.
Files on C: are often protected by Windows in various ways,
Better to install software on a different
gt;
> From what you write I get the feeling that you want to merge projects, or
> what do you try to do?
>
> Carl
>
> ps.
> A .pto is a project file and thus not digested via an "add image(s)"
> command. Try opening a .doc (containing image names) in Photoshop..
Please check if the project file is not included as image. The
> extension, ".pto", does not correspond to an image file ;)
>
>
>
> Em seg, 4 de fev de 2019 às 12:48, Abrimaal >
> escreveu:
>
>> [image: hugin-could-not-decode-image-from-pto-file.png]
>&
[image: hugin-could-not-decode-image-from-pto-file.png]
While loading images from a .pto file, this error message is displayed.
The images have not been moved, not renamed, the are still in the same
folder as the .pto file.
The filenames and paths to images stored in the .pto file did not change
The problem is that there is no rectangular (planar) projection available
in Hugin.
It is different from rectilinear.
Rectilinear projection preserves straight lines, but does not preserve
straight angles.
Rectangular does not preserve areas, but preserves straight lines and
angles.
The adjustm
I have just read the topic on aligning stars. I sometimes work with night
panoramas, where the I add and adjust control points and masks manually.
Changing the whole Windows theme is uncomfortable, when working with other
applications at once (image viewer, Windows explorer...)
Is it easy to crea
I have just read the topic on aligning stars. I sometimes work with night
panoramas, where the I add and adjust control points and masks manually.
Changing the whole Windows theme is uncomfortable, when working with other
applications at once (image viewer, Windows explorer...)
Is it easy to crea
Should I exclude the 1st image in the simple mode and optimize? How? I
cannot find in the menu how to adjust dimensions (field of view) of the 2nd
image.
> You need to optimize hfov of the second image only in this case.
>
So use user defined optimization and optimize v,y,p,r of second image o
I was trying to stitch two photos of the same object. One image was large
about 5000x3200 px, the other one was smaller 1200x800.
The first one conatined lens data, the other did not.
The detector did not find any control points, so I placed them manually
where they should be.
After optimizati
Image editors save files with various color profiles, black-scaled or so...
Are the images loaded to Hugin converted to bitmaps (or .tif) for
processing?
If yes, there should be no problem to stitch images even in different
formats - jpg + png, jpg + bmp, jpg + tif, any that Hugin can open. Not
The line detector often places multiple vertical lines on traffic signs,
antennas, trees, because they are straight, but very rarely vertical.
They are easy to detect because of high contrast and they are usually
detected as the first lines.
To minimize the risk of multiplication of the same erro
Frederic Da Vitoria <
> davi...@gmail.com > wrote:
> >2018-01-30 21:09 GMT+01:00 Abrimaal >:
> >
> >> Yes, after some work I also think that the rearrangement would make
> >too
> >> much mess. At least opening projects from the main button could
>
>
>
> Am Samstag, 27. Januar 2018 18:58:51 UTC+1 schrieb Abrimaal:
>>
>> How to distinguish between Open project and Merge / Add images to project:
>>
>> On a blank screen, big button clicked:
>> - Selecting a single .pto file does NEW, Open Project
>> - Se
File/Add (not using the big button) will not do New,
but it will allow to add images and projects to the currently open project.
On Saturday, January 27, 2018 at 9:11:15 AM UTC+1, T. Modes wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Samstag, 27. Januar 2018 07:03:48 UTC+1 schrieb Abrimaal:
>>
>
Thanks. I'm testing it right now. What features are new in the 2018 beta to
be tested?
The Windows installer does not contain enblend and enfuse, fortunately I
made a backup of the 2017 version, that was removed during the installation
(it should never be removed, I still keep the 2014 beta vers
Do it only once and forever. In File / Preferences / Assistant /
Downscale final pano [ 100 ] percent of the max width.
The panoramas will never downsized again (until you don't want to).
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 at 6:57:53 AM UTC+2, tda...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I scanned an A2 sized electrical s
I am not sure if I understood your question. You want to replace two photos
and save a new 62 image panorama.
First Save as a new project. Very important.
Go to the Editor, remove the 2 photos you don't need.
Add the new 2 photos
Control points: for two photos you can add them manually (and fin
If ever it happens. Maybe a marginal detail, but very important when working
with photos on Android and PC.
Please respect the filenames when saving. The most of Android apps save files
with random names. There are only a few exceptions that append a suffix to the
original filename.
--
A list
The problem is that Hugin does not offer undistorted projection, suitable
for scanned documents.
Thy this:
00. Before all, note down the dimensions in pixels of each partial image.
01. Load all images to Hugin
02. Set the projection to rectilinear
03. Go to Panorama Editor, Control Points tab
0
etion of the file. Or if the problem is that dropbox hinders the file
>from being deleted while it is uploaded the following can be done:
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 7:36:03 AM UTC+2, Gunter Königsmann wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03.07.2017 23:45, Abrimaal wrote:
> > First of a
First of all, thanks a lot for single photo straightening mode. It saves a
lot of time and manual work.
There is a small problem that can grow into gigabytes. (Windows)
The batch processor does not remove temporary .tif files from single
photos, but successfully removes them when stitching a mul
I will add from myself, what cannot be set up in the filename preferences
yet.
To abbreviate long suffixes such as "blended_fused" and projection names
(predefined or defined by a user).
It took a long time to guess which one is which. I am still not sure when I
see "_fused" - was it composed fr
Windows 64bit:
I installed the 2017.0.rc1 version in a different folder than the stable
version 2016.x. The installer removed the stable version what should not
happen, but it did not remove older (2014 and 2015) versions installed in
different folders. The 2014.0.0.5 version is a "special" rele
It depends from the point of view.
In the example above the buildings are in perspective, the object in the
middle is the street. Vertical lines are necessary, but horizontal are not
desired.
The projection is Panini general, but it can be also cylindrical, Mercator
or architectural - it depe
I have not tried with landscapes, but the results with straightening
architecture are satisfying.
On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 10:35:03 PM UTC+2, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
> 2017-06-06 22:29 GMT+02:00 Abrimaal >:
>
>> I can only add that detection of horizontal lines r
I can only add that detection of horizontal lines require some boring work
what could be easily done by the program.
Now you have to:
rotate all the images 90 deg (or the final panorama)
detect vertical lines
rotate the images back
change alignment of every line from vertical to horizontal
It co
I can only add that detection of horizontal lines require some boring work
what could be easily done by the program.
Now you have to:
rotate all the images 90 deg (or the final panorama)
detect vertical lines
rotate the images back
change alignment of every line from vertical to horizontal
It co
tions of a rectangle.
On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 9:32:22 PM UTC+2, Erik Krause wrote:
>
> Am 14.05.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Abrimaal:
> > In the cylindrical projection, the panorama is projected on the external
> > surface of a cylinder. It is usable for objects viewed from distanc
The internal and external surface of a cylinder.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this
On Sunday, May 14, 2017 at 7:38:53 PM UTC+2, Abrimaal wrote:
>
> In the cylindrical projection, the panorama is projected on the external
> surface of a cylinder. It is usable for objects viewed from distance (like
> Earth from a satellite).
> I have many panoramas where the
In the cylindrical projection, the panorama is projected on the external
surface of a cylinder. It is usable for objects viewed from distance (like
Earth from a satellite).
I have many panoramas where the camera is "the centre of the universe".
In the example everybody can see that the objects in
The photos are not taken from the same point.
To align them you should work manually.
If you used a control point detector before, there are many control points
on the trees and leaves, better to start a new project than remove them any
photo vs any.
First, you should decide what objects are
There are many repeating details, that could be misaligned by the control
point finder.
In the Preview you may not see this, because these images are under the
visible ones.
Try to disable the first images and check which ones are incorrectly
aligned.
Check the control points, any photo with a
In the advanced mode, they are in the Stitcher tab. These marked are the
most useful.
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 9:18:44 PM UTC+1, FrankBa wrote:
>
> HI Abrimaal
>>>>
>>> Found it !!
>
> I was using the stitcher option in advanced and expert mode
If you want to keep the partial .tif images, before saving the final
panorama, check the option "Keep intermediate images".
The same in the Panorama editor and Advanced / Expert interface.
By default all .pto files are saved on the disk in the same folder as the
panorama, you can use them again.
The most of scanners store info about the scanner model in EXIF data. Hugin
can connect to a camera lens database, but I don't know if any scanner
database exists. It depends also on the orientation of scanner paper. It is
important that all parts of the map should be scanned in the same directi
It is possible to create an image like this without blending the moving
object with the background. Draw a mask around the object on the 1st photo,
copy the mask to all other photos, then delete the mask from the 1st. The
same for all images. At the end check if the masks don't overlap.
On Frid
I see that you are not the only one long time user who has problems with
maps. I have never managed to stitch any map in Hugin, while I stitch and
straighten many photos every day. Even when the control points are placed
correctly, the projection distorts every map. Even when the projection is
Friday, December 16, 2016 at 6:43:36 PM UTC+1, T. Modes wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016 17:18:49 UTC+1 schrieb Abrimaal:
>
>>
>> *I think it is possible to run the batch in a silent (quiet, invisible,
>> non-invasive) mode *
>> or move the icon
When minimized to tray, there are even more messages. Both pulling up the
taskbar and text messages from the tray. I know that Hugin is built of many
.exe files, but can the Batch processor be completely invisible? Just like
(for example) enblend.exe - no icon, no messages?
On Friday, December
ase.
On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 8:46:13 AM UTC+2, Abrimaal wrote:
>
> A suggestion:
> A checkbox in settings
> [ v ] Do not display any messages, I am working hard in another program.
> or
> [ v ] Display error messages only
>
> This applies to the overload of me
or try to use Align image stack instead of Hugin CPfind. It worked for me
with about 100 video frames, but they were small size (800x600). If you
have enough RAM, larger images should be displayed too.
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 2:44:48 PM UTC+1, jan t wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm tryin
I'd like to see an example how to prepare such script.
On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 10:28:17 AM UTC+1, bugbear wrote:
>
> In that case I recommend a script.
>
> BugBear
>
> Abrimaal wrote:
> > How many? Hundreds in every folder and hundreds of folders :)
&g
How many? Hundreds in every folder and hundreds of folders :)
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:52:18 AM UTC+1, bugbear wrote:
>
> Abrimaal wrote:
> > No, taken with various cameras, in different years, seasons, various
> objects (mainly architecture)
>
> How many ph
,v,b
run calculate size
run autocrop
save .pto file as original-s.pto
save as original-s.jpg (all images are .jpg)
next
Some files will require manual adjustment, but at least half will be done
correctly :)
On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 6:28:28 PM UTC+1, bugbear wrote:
>
> Abrimaal
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
