, 2021 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OSMF desktop
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
Does anyone
Does anyone use this? Is it only useful for system programmers, or might
application developers find it of use? Is it in any way related to the Zowe
desktop? Are there any videos demonstrating it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Ah! thank you Ronald, that works
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Ronald
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Thursday, 21 January 2021 8:12 AM CST
Subject: Re: clarification please - is z/OSMF required for migrating z/OS from
v2.3 to v2.4 ?
Carmen,
If you open the workflow
men Vitullo
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 14:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: clarification please - is z/OSMF required for migrating z/OS from
v2.3 to v2.4 ?
I am about 89 % complete with my install, one thing I wish would be the ability
to copy or export some migration action
I am about 89 % complete with my install, one thing I wish would be the ability
to copy or export some migration actions I still have to do.
for example, the Remove or delete data sets, paths and references, rather than
having to continue to come back to z/OSMF each time and check what I have
Hi Dave,
Yes...I do tend to let topics move along until I feel I need to stumble in :).
There is absolutely no doubt that the security for z/OSMF is the toughest part
to get working. I would like to suggest trying out the Security Configuration
Assistant, which was meant to help
at the end.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:43 AM Marna WALLE wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
> Please take a look at many of the recent performance enhancements that we've
> done in z/OSMF, specifically for smaller LPARs. We had heard very positive
> things about these enhancements, and we are still l
, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: clarification please - is z/OSMF required for migrating z/OS from
v2.3 to v2.4
Hi Dave,
We certainly want to have the z/OSMF installation (with a portable software
instance) easier than a CustomPac Serverpac! I do understand, though, that
anything different will take a time to get used to. With that in mind, I'd
like to mention a sample portable software instance which
On Jan 19, 2021, at 9:02 AM, Marna WALLE wrote:
>
> Of course, we can't be all things to all people
Why not? In contrast to paper manuals, web applications can have hyperlinks
that provide for multiple paths through a task.
I don’t want to go on a rant, but I see far too many web applications
Hi Dana,
This is a good comment about the organization of the z/OS Upgrade Workflow!
I'm glad you brought it up.
When we were organizing the z/OS Migration book, oh so many years ago, we had
debated just your point. Should we do it by element-first, or timing-first?
As you know when using
Hi Dave,
Please take a look at many of the recent performance enhancements that we've
done in z/OSMF, specifically for smaller LPARs. We had heard very positive
things about these enhancements, and we are still looking at doing more.
z/OSMF specific new functions can be found here: https
I am also a small site, and I am shutting down within the year. Stopping
at z/OS 2.3. I am not sure what I'd have done if I had to do another z/OS
upgrade, usually every other release. It's clear that IBM plans to make z/OSMF
a requirement. And for zIIP-less shops, on small machines
The only real problem I have with z/OSMF is the overhead. Several of the sites
I manage have very small z13s systems, without zIIPs or even multiple CPUs, so
the overhead is beyond what they can live with.
I doubt that z/OSMF will ever be the installation vehicle for z/OS, but it's
nice
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:34:12 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>While z/OSMF is not strictly required for upgrading z/OS V2.3 to V2.4,
>it is highly recommended, specifically for the z/OS V2.4 Upgrade Workflow:
>
>https://github.com/IBM/IBM-Z-zOS/tree/master/zOS-Workflow/zOS%20V2
" However, IBM's plan is to eventually require z/OSMF for future software
installation. We have not yet announced when or for which product releases,
but it's certainly past time to start getting comfortable with z/OSMF in
general."
Hopefully well after I retire Unless it is m
On 1/15/2021 10:00 AM, Bruce Lightsey wrote:
I am not one of the system programmers but have been tasked with getting this
answer for them (and to manage them). My systems guys like SMPe and
ServerPacks, etc but z/OSMF is “Alienware” to them – must I tell them to get
over it and go
- is z/OSMF required for migrating
z/OS from v2.3 to v2.4 ?
I am not one of the system programmers but have been tasked with getting this
answer for them (and to manage them). My systems guys like SMPe and
ServerPacks, etc but z/OSMF is “Alienware” to them – must I tell them to get
over it and go
marc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Yes, if they want the upgrade workflow. No, at this time the ServerPac is
> still doable outside of z/OSMF.
>
>
>
> z/OSMF is definitely the future. They've procrastinated long enough!
>
>
>
> -Original Messa
z/OSMF is not required but downloading and using the workflows into z/OSMF,
which replaced the migration guide really helps with migration actions IMHO.
I was very hesitant to use z/OSMF and the workflow, I found it aided in my
migration
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message
Yes, if they want the upgrade workflow. No, at this time the ServerPac is still
doable outside of z/OSMF.
z/OSMF is definitely the future. They've procrastinated long enough!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bruce Lightsey
Sent: Friday, January
I am not one of the system programmers but have been tasked with getting this
answer for them (and to manage them). My systems guys like SMPe and
ServerPacks, etc but z/OSMF is “Alienware” to them – must I tell them to get
over it and go with the workflow ?
Thanks
Bruce
Bruce Lightsey
Thank you all for your replies.
It appears that z/OSMF NCA is, as we say, the best thing since sliced
bread, but many do not like sliced bread.
Our configuration is not typical because the system is used to test a
SSL/TLS application and developers need to test z/OS servers and clients
ion
> which was excellent.
> We tried z/OSMF NCA but don't like it.
> Maybe IBM will force us to use it.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM Keith Gooding <
> 034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies
On 10/26/2020 12:21 PM, Keith Gooding wrote:
Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies or any other policies ?
Any views on NCA vs manual editing of the policy file ?
When I first encountered AT-TLS I used the Windows version to generate a simple
policy file for one type of
We are using manual modifications. Before, we used the Windows application
which was excellent.
We tried z/OSMF NCA but don't like it.
Maybe IBM will force us to use it.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM Keith Gooding <
034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Is any
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Keith Gooding
Sent: 26 October 2020 16:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/osmf Network Configuration Assistant
This mail originated from outside our organisation -
034af3894af4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Is anyone using this to maintain AT-TLS policies or any other policies ?
Any views on NCA vs manual editing of the policy file ?
When I first encountered AT-TLS I used the Windows version to generate a simple
policy file for one type of application and thereafter did manual edits to the
These PTFs are against IBM's z/OSMF product, not the Linux Foundation's
OMP Zowe open source project https://www.zowe.org/
On 10/22/2020 5:29 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
https://twitter.com/A_Hermelink/status/1319196681527754753?s=20
@mwalle
I'm looking at a list of recent z/OSMF performance
1:35 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Positive feedback, z/OSMF - Workflows
>
>NO, zOSMF is not a requirement to install 2.4. It is automatically installed
>though when you install 2.4, so maybe that's the mix up you had.
>
>Brian
>
>
>On Tue, 3 Oc
: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 11:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Positive feedback, z/OSMF - Workflows
NO, zOSMF is not a requirement to install 2.4. It is automatically installed
though when you install 2.4, so maybe that's the mix up you had.
Brian
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:47:35
NO, zOSMF is not a requirement to install 2.4. It is automatically installed
though when you install 2.4, so maybe that's the mix up you had.
Brian
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:47:35 +, Pesce, Andy wrote:
>I am at z/OS 2.2 and have heard that z/OSMF has to be active in order to
>instal
On 10/13/2020 9:47 AM, Pesce, Andy wrote:
I am at z/OS 2.2 and have heard that z/OSMF has to be active in order to
install z/OS 2.4.
Not sure where you heard this, but it is NOT true!
z/OSMF is not required to install z/OS 2.4. In fact, IBM does not even
have a Portable Software Instance
: Positive feedback, z/OSMF - Workflows
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
I first installed and configured z/osmf
I first installed and configured z/osmf @ the 2.2 release due to the need for
my I/P support folks to define I/P Policies.
IMHO if you do not need to use any of the features of z/osmf at 2.2 I would
wait, the configuration is different, user data moved from var/zosmf to
global/zosmf
I am at z/OS 2.2 and have heard that z/OSMF has to be active in order to
install z/OS 2.4. Is z/OSMF easier to install/configure
than the earlier releases?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 7:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
Thank you, Carmen!!
For those that haven't tried it yet, please do, so you can have the upgrade
information you need and do not have to rely upon the "exported" format
entirely.
An 8-min YouTube video can give you a great overall lesson on how to maneuver
around
Discussion List On Behalf Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Positive feedback, z/OSMF - Workflows
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing
I was very concerned when IBM took away the migration guide for z/OS, I've been
using the migration guide for all my upgrades as long as I can remember.
some time ago I downloaded and imported the z/OS 2.3 to z/OS 2.4 Workflow, last
week my z/OS order was downloaded and I'm working on the
Start over?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OSMF workflow step State unskip
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4
alf
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] z/OSMF workflow step State unskip
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4 migration workflow using z/OSMF, and i
clicked 'Skip' on a step by accident. Is there a way to un'Skip' a step?
On 7/29/2020 11:50 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4 migration workflow using z/OSMF, and i
clicked 'Skip' on a step by accident. Is there a way to un'Skip' a step? I
don't see any options available in the context menu for the step that might
unskip. I've
I'm working my way through the z/OS 2.4 migration workflow using z/OSMF, and i
clicked 'Skip' on a step by accident. Is there a way to un'Skip' a step? I
don't see any options available in the context menu for the step that might
unskip. I've also RTFKC and didn't find much help
t;
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 9:12:27 AM
Subject: Re: z/OSMF & TSS
As long as you are relatively current with your TSS maintenance, there are TSS
versions in CAKOJCL0 of the IBM samples for zOSMF setup that have had the RACF
commands converted to TSS comma
Of
Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 8:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF & TSS
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
Mark, unfortunately I have a new laptop for working at home, my
HTH's
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Steely.Mark"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 5:12:48 PM
Subject: z/OSMF & TSS
Does anyone have z/OSMF active using TSS (Top Secret) ? I have been using the
"Convert z/OS 2.3 member IZUS
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 5:12:48 PM
Subject: z/OSMF & TSS
Does anyone have z/OSMF active using TSS (Top Secret) ? I have been using the
"Convert z/OS 2.3 member IZUSEC from RACF to TSS commands".
z/OSMF still has problems activating - I would like to
Does anyone have z/OSMF active using TSS (Top Secret) ? I have been using the
"Convert z/OS 2.3 member IZUSEC from RACF to TSS commands".
z/OSMF still has problems activating - I would like to see how other sites have
setup the ID's IBM requires.
My main concern i
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:30:42 -0400, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
>Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
Chuck Norris doesn't need a a Web App to apply PTFs, he just roundhouse kicks
them in.
Art Gutowski
General Motors, LLC
Workflow, some we might want to
pass to our z/OSMF development group, but we can work through that once we have
your list.
When you mentioned "exploded", might you have meant "exported"? If, in your
case, exporting just selected items you want could give you format t
me to start over. So yes I had a fully populated IZUPRMxx member
however when I attempted to start my z/osmf it kept giving me an error about
the /var/zosmf/data/home/izusvr directory not found. This was after I moved it
to /global/zosmf/data/home/izusvr
So yes I ran the izuconfig.SH member
Hi Terri,
You re-ran IZUSETUP, not recently right? That was made obsolete way back on
z/OS V2.1 with APAR PI54286 (2016), to move to the "modern" parmlib (IZUPRMxx)
method. I hope you still aren't using that, and don't have the server running
on your z/OS V2.1 system but rather on a higher
-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 8:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 Migration manual and z/OSMF usage
External Email
On 3/26/2020 5
On 3/26/2020 5:45 PM, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
It then immediately fails stating z/OSMF cant talk to the 2.1 lpar, because
there is no IP address under the SYSTEM tab in z/OSMF.
What do you see when you open the Systems tab? Do you see an entry for
all 5 of your sysplex members, including your
installed the serverpac for z/OS 2.4 and ready to IPL and went looking
for the migration guide for 2.4 and used the exploded z/OS 2.2 version (close
enough) copy IBM provides.
However then I got curious about using z/OSMF, so I downloaded the XML for z/OS
2.2 to 2.4 and the HC_rexx and Discovery
Mark,
It sounds like you might have a somewhat ongoing requirement to have z/OSMF
Lite to test your products with, until such time as you feel your customers
have moved up to a more full z/OSMF system. This could be a case where you'd
want to have another z/OSMF server configured separately
0 7:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you trust the sender.]
On 3/16/2020 1:28 PM, Jousma, David wrote:
> Did something change with the PARML
On 3/16/2020 1:28 PM, Jousma, David wrote:
Did something change with the PARMLIB Plugin statement usage? I
know early on, once a plugin was added in parmlib it was activated
and simply removing the plugin from parmlib definition didn’t
actually remove it from use or make it invisible. Seems
Good question. Since the file system that'll be used for this z/OSMF instance
isn't used for anything else, and we're not yet live with 2.4 on that system,
I'm might just empty that var file system and start over again.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Marna WALLE
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 12:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF and z/OSMF "Lite"
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or clic
Thanks again. When we had a fuller function z/OSMF up under z/OS 2.4 last
weekend I used the Security Configuration Assistant to resolve any problems in
that area.
We're a software development company, and our developers wanted a basic
stripped down z/OSMF instance to ensure that our products
Mark,
You already have *more* than what they are asking. If they want Lite, I'd say
that it is there with more. If you don't like a specific plug-in and don't
want to use it anymore, by all means do not include its activation anymore.
But if they wanted Lite, and you have a decent selection
16, 2020 9:10 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
> On 3/15/2020 2:35 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>
> > I've read the manuals, but can't figure out how to convert a full
> > function z/OSMF environment to the lite version. Is this even
> > possible, and if so can anyone
On 3/15/2020 2:35 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
I've read the manuals, but can't figure out how to convert a full
function z/OSMF environment to the lite version. Is this even
possible, and if so can anyone point me to the relevant
documentation? Thanks.
I'm guessing this is not a scenario the z/OSMF
We have configured full function z/OSMF environments on older releases of z/OS
for our developers to build/test interfaces to it from our own products. On our
z/OS 2.4 system the developers have asked for a z/OSMF Lite environment to be
made available there, once again to test our products so
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Crayford
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 10:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OSMF Startup issue
On my system the jar can be found at
/usr/lpp/wbem/jclient/sblim-cim-client2.jar
)
at
com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebApp.notifyServletContextCreated(WebApp.java:2376)
at [internal classes]
[ERROR ] SRVE0283E: Exception caught while initializing context:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: z/OSMF initialization failure
:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: z/OSMF initialization failure.
at
com.ibm.zoszmf.util.log.listener.UICommonBootstrap.contextInitialized(UICommonBootstrap.java:212)
at
com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.webapp.WebApp.notifyServletContextCreated(WebApp.java:2376)
at [internal classes]
Caused
The z/OSMF Workflow is a framework that supports z/OS System Programmers
(Workflow provider) to define a guided flow (workflow) through steps to
accomplish a system management or configuration task. System programmers can
organize the tasks they perform for day to day operation in a workflow
The problem was actually with the MAXTHREADTASKS in BPXPRMxx which was set
too low
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 13:49, Mike Shorkend wrote:
> Thanks Mark, I will give it a try.
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, 21:37 Mark Charles, wrote:
>
>> I just set up z/OSMF and remember the answer
Thanks Mark, I will give it a try.
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, 21:37 Mark Charles, wrote:
> I just set up z/OSMF and remember the answer to this: MEMLIMIT parameter
> needs to actually work. This can be controlled by SMFPRMxx and/or SMF
> exits. You probably won't get any messages from SMF
I just set up z/OSMF and remember the answer to this: MEMLIMIT parameter needs
to actually work. This can be controlled by SMFPRMxx and/or SMF exits. You
probably won't get any messages from SMF when SMF sets your limit too low, by
ignoring what is coded on your EXEC statement.
My test
Hi
I successfully configured z/OSMF on a sandbox system.
Now I am trying to get it to work in a development environment and when I
start the server I am getting
JVMDUMP039I Processing dump event "systhrow", detail "java/lang/
OutOfMemoryError" at 2019/07/25 06:35:29 - please w
Dear Mainframer,
We extended survey for three days, IBM z/OS Management Facility 2019 Survey
will be closed on July 26th. The link is
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/5044915/z-OS-Management-Facility-2019-Survey
Thanks in advance for your participation!
the most important thing is to make sure the security is setup correctly for
CFZCIM, IZUANG1, and IZUSVR1, since you've not setup z/OSMF previously you'll
have none of the migration pains most of us had.
the configuration is now finally a parmlib member, the moving of the data file
from /var
, 2019, 6:01 PM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> got it - thank you
>
>
> Carmen Vitullo
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Erin Yu"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:20:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Share your thoughts about z/OSMF
got it - thank you
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Erin Yu"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:20:55 PM
Subject: Re: Share your thoughts about z/OSMF with IBM
Thanks for all your attention. Somebody said there was no link in
Thanks for all your attention. Somebody said there was no link in the recent
mail, here is the survey link:
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/5044915/z-OS-Management-Facility-2019-Survey
We'd appreciate your response by July 22, 2019.
thank you, I'm sure he did, I didn't find it in my mail
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Elardus Engelbrecht"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 7:56:19 AM
Subject: Re: Share your thoughts about z/OSMF with IBM
Carmen Vitullo w
Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>I never saw a link, can you provide? I'd be happy to share my..thoughts
Erin Yu already posted that on 2019-07-04.
This is what Erin wrote:
"We would like to understand your current experience with the z/OS Management
Facility (z/OSMF). Take our IBM z/OS Ma
I never saw a link, can you provide? I'd be happy to share my..thoughts
thanks
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Erin Yu"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 10:26:28 PM
Subject: Re: Share your thoughts about z/OSMF with IBM
Jus
Just a kindly reminder, this survey will be closed on July 22, 2019. Welcome
your feedback.
Regards, The z/OSMF Team
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Dear Mainframer,
We would like to understand your current experience with the z/OS Management
Facility (z/OSMF). Take our IBM z/OS Management Facility 2019 Survey.
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/5044915/z-OS-Management-Facility-2019-Survey
We'd appreciate your response by July 22, 2019
I have had many issues with zOSMF RACF settings. Manuals - Redbook - SAMPLIB
members did not match each other. Personally I could not have made it work
without RACTRACE utility - as in:
ftp://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/GG243984/ractrace.zip
regards
Munif
Now - they are not all correct but they are a reasonable start
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
I just found
17, 2019 2:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
I think my teammate went to the CA Site, I don't expect TSS rules for usage to
be in SMP/E format ?
I"ll
pril 17, 2019 1:08:58 PM
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA
webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
If you google z/osmf top secret or racf or acf2 it will bring you to a CA
webpage. And the jobs are in a SMP/e library
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:58 PM
To: IBM
I am in the same boat here - clear as mud
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "David Jousma" <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:23:46 PM
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
I found, and downloa
: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 9:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS
cookbook for z
-
From: "Tom Marchant" <000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 8:22:48 AM
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:36:59 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to config
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:36:59 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure.
>
>Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other than a lot of work
I don't have an answer to that question, but you might want to
consider the following, from the z/OS 2.4 preview ann
TSS here also, and luckily my TSS sysprog has been able to either find the TSS
cookbook for z/osmf security setup or has been able to translate RACF to TSS, I
agree, still a mess to setup correctly.
still getting issues with some 2.2 security setup due to the security group
does not understand
The shop where we are installing z/OSMF is CA-TSS also. That makes it a mild
mess to setup.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
IMHO the security set-up really isn't that bad now. There are multiple SAMPLIB
jobs for each function/plugin so it's far, far easier than the old shell
the light of day here.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
>Marshall Stone
>Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: z?OSMF
>
>**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
>
>**DO NOT open attachme
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent configs
(IPSec TLSv12, IDS
We use it to deliver RESTful access to z/OS flat files.
It was also required for Common Data Provider configuration.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:37 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> z/OSMF to say it mildly is a lot to configure.
>
>
>
> Is anyone getting any use of z/OSMF other tha
I use configuration assistant very often to maintain Policy Agent configs
(IPSec TLSv12, IDS, etc)
Regards,
Marshall Stone
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z?OSMF
:( cannot
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse 1 Robinson"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:54:34 PM
Subject: Re: z?OSMF
'Can get' or 'cannot get'???
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric D
501 - 600 of 738 matches
Mail list logo
