Re: [LU] Wolves

And scored from a blatant handball assist. On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 22:45, Ryan via Leedslist wrote: > Coincidentally scum gave away a blatant penalty VAR didn’t give it > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 7 Aug 2022, at 18:22, n...@6haroldplace.co.uk wrote: > > > > Plus…when did we last have a

Re: [LU] Wolves

Coincidentally scum gave away a blatant penalty VAR didn’t give it Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Aug 2022, at 18:22, n...@6haroldplace.co.uk wrote: > > Plus…when did we last have a positive goal difference? > > Nick > >> >> Anyone able to find the new rule that says Keepers can punch forwards

Re: [LU] Wolves

Plus…when did we last have a positive goal difference? Nick > > Anyone able to find the new rule that says Keepers can punch forwards in the > face and not give away a penalty? > > Thought not. > > Good three points. New lads look promising. > > Nick >

[LU] Wolves

Anyone able to find the new rule that says Keepers can punch forwards in the face and not give away a penalty? Thought not. Good three points. New lads look promising. Nick ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Wolves

:43:59 AM To: John Boocock Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves 1 down, 9 to go. We need 10 wins to stay up. If we can get Sinisterra firing on the left and Aaronson on the right, with Bamford and Geldhart converting the chances that will come, we could surprise a few teams this

Re: [LU] Wolves

1 down, 9 to go. We need 10 wins to stay up. If we can get Sinisterra firing on the left and Aaronson on the right, with Bamford and Geldhart converting the chances that will come, we could surprise a few teams this season. Left back is still a concern, and I am not convinced about our CBs in

[LU] Wolves

Phew I'm shattered. Completely mental game. Still can't work out how stats show Wolves to be on the top side. Pluses? Aaronson and Kristenson. The kids coming on and running around with purpose. One single tackle from Llorente which says he can do it. Minuses? Poor old Meslier being let down by

[LU] Wolves mini-review

Folks,  One of the very great nights!  One of those games that will be forever remembered for the lows and then (transitory) highs of following a team like Leeds United.  2-0 down at HT after conceding a gut-wrenching second goal 10 minutes into injury time.  Losing half a team to injury

Re: [LU] Wolves 1 1

League One Liam ... need I say more.  Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, October 26, 2021, 1:06 pm, Robert Heath wrote: I'm glad you said that about Cooper. I think he gets way too much stick on here and in other Leeds fora. He was indeed outstanding on Saturday. As for

Re: [LU] Wolves 1 1

I'm glad you said that about Cooper. I think he gets way too much stick on here and in other Leeds fora. He was indeed outstanding on Saturday. As for Gelhardt.well, I haven't been as excited about a young Leeds striker since Lyndon Simmons! On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:51 PM Nicholas

Re: [LU] Wolves 1 1

Watched it again and I thought we were actually much better than I thought on first viewing. They were really struggling to contain us last 25 minutes and even in the first half we were pretty dominant. Most of all, our pressing was excellent especially around the half-way line. Cooper was

[LU] Wolves 1 1

The last minute equaliser almost made this feel like a winA draw was the least we deserved against a team that nullified us twice last season and tried to do the same this time.   If this is their typical performance it must be shit being a wolves fan.To play a team you beat twice last time, 

[LU] Wolves presser comments from Phil Hay

Bielsa says Phillips is "healthy" but because he's been missing for three weeks, putting him in against Wolves on Saturday would be "too quick. To think of him for Saturday would be too soon, before he is at his best." #lufc Bamford and Ayling are both out, for the next two games. Raphinha is

[LU] Wolves tickets on sale Monday @ 1pm UK time

per https://www.leedsunited.com/news/ticketing/28811/tickets-wolverhampton-wanderers-h ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us

[LU] Wolves

Useful result at Molyneux tonight. Looks like Wolves keeper has taken a bad knock though. Wolves 0 Scousers 1 Betty Sent from the passenger seat of an A40 ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Wolves

They are the scabbiest bastards we’ve played all season. Fuck Sake. Nick ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org Find us on Facebook

Re: [LU] Wolves are animals!

It’s funny how perspective works Robert. I look at that line up and don’t like it at all. I don’t see how we get the ball to Bamford in good spots. Struijk looks to me like he may be a solid defender one day. I don’t think he is up for where he is playing today. I hope to be wrong! Talk in

[LU] Wolves are animals!

"Wolves are animals!" someone behind me once cried at Molineux after some clogger had chopped one of our innocent chaps like Johnny Giles or Allan Clarke down for the 5th time. Soamazingly, bielsa has made a very rare unforced change and picked Roberts over Alioski. I am very happy

Re: [LU] Wolves

Leedslist Sent: 20 October 2020 20:40 To: Jim Moran ; Richard Walker Cc: leeds list Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Definitely one from Rodrigo (could have done better I thought) and thought there was another (but could be senility) On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 03:37:26 PM EDT, Richard Walker

Re: [LU] Wolves

Definitely one from Rodrigo (could have done better I thought) and thought there was another (but could be senility) On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 03:37:26 PM EDT, Richard Walker wrote: There were plenty of positives but we were well beaten by a better team. I’m struggling to

Re: [LU] Wolves

There were plenty of positives but we were well beaten by a better team. I’m struggling to remember those saves. I think you might be confusing save with picking the ball up. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 8:26 pm, Nicholas Armit wrote: Their goalie made two

Re: [LU] Wolves

Their goalie made two saves...directly at him but two saves. Also they had a goal rightly disallowed, one great save from Meslier and the goal. Besides that nothing else I believe. Rich I think you are being extremely critical here we were killing them the first 25-30 with really great play.

Re: [LU] Wolves

Apart from the two shots on goal, and the (I hate it) greater expected goals, and that had Phillips left the shot alone we’d have drawn 0-0, which would have been a deserved draw. Tight game. Any result would have been “deserved” or fair. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 20:07, Richard Walker via Leedslist

Re: [LU] Wolves

Not sure how anyone can say we deserved a draw or at least a draw when their keeper has not made a save all night ? I thought we were out thought and out played by a very good side. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 3:46 pm, Nicholas Armit via Leedslist wrote:

Re: [LU] Wolves

No I hot that you were just commenting on what other fans said (saw the same thing on Twitter somewhere). What they are saying is total bollocks what you are saying is lucid, well-thought out and backed by evidence. ;-) Nick On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 10:44:03 AM EDT, Nick wrote:

Re: [LU] Wolves

yeah - you’ve misunderstood me there…but hey… I was talking about what the fans of other teams were saying about our style of play…which, in case it hasn’t been clear, I am a huge fan of. We’ve lost 2 out 5 so far - league winners needed two penalties - last night this solid Premier league

Re: [LU] Wolves

Exactly. Really we played a really good, established premier league team who have excellent players and are in Europe and we made them look shit for 25-30 minutes. Yes the clear-cut chances did not come but it was great. Second half they were better but we never looked totally outplayed (they

Re: [LU] Wolves

Total bollocks. On Tuesday, October 20, 2020, 05:59:40 AM EDT, Nick wrote: "all Leeds do is run, run, run”…is a bit like saying all Spain / Barcelona did was pass, pass, pass… get in and stop them…do something better… N > On 20 Oct 2020, at 09:47, Michael Benjamin wrote: > >

Re: [LU] Wolves

"all Leeds do is run, run, run”…is a bit like saying all Spain / Barcelona did was pass, pass, pass… get in and stop them…do something better… N > On 20 Oct 2020, at 09:47, Michael Benjamin wrote: > > "all Leeds do is run, run, run", and to some extent they're right

[LU] Wolves

A tad pissed off after last night and not felt that for a while which is good. I thought Wolves played the perfect game, they defended en masse with 3 central defenders and despite us coming out of the tracks fast they never really looked in trouble demonstrated by the fact that their keeper

Re: [LU] Wolves

; > Michael > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > From: Leedslist on behalf of > ni...@sykesonline.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 11:33:15 AM > To: leedslist@gn.apc.org > Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves > &g

Re: [LU] Wolves

_ From: Leedslist on behalf of ni...@sykesonline.com Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 11:33:15 AM To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves I'm not massively downhearted about the loss. They happen. I do however continue to be perplexed at our lack of ability to cross the ball with an

Re: [LU] Wolves

eeds do is run, run, run", and to some extent they're right. Nigel (the Dublin one) -Original Message- From: Leedslist On Behalf Of David Boocock Sent: 20 October 2020 09:15 To: Nick Cc: leeds list Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves From the Swinnow area of Queensland a loss is a loss, whic

Re: [LU] Wolves

From the Swinnow area of Queensland a loss is a loss, which ever way you dress it up邏 Norman and big Jack would never accept this. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 5:39 pm, Nick wrote: > exactly Ted - that was my biggest gripe, not being at the ground…I hate > watching our games on TV > > And you know -

Re: [LU] Wolves

exactly Ted - that was my biggest gripe, not being at the ground…I hate watching our games on TV And you know - we lost a game or two last season, it turned out OK > On 20 Oct 2020, at 08:37, Ted wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 08:28, David Boocock wrote: > >> We lost it doesn’t count,

Re: [LU] Wolves

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 08:28, David Boocock wrote: > We lost it doesn’t count, another game to make up. If enjoyable football > is watching your team lose I may as well follow Barnstoneworth United! > 8-1...8 bloody 1, to Brighouse! The centre forward wears glasses! > > It’s a loss get

Re: [LU] Wolves

We lost it doesn’t count, another game to make up. If enjoyable football is watching your team lose I may as well follow Barnstoneworth United! 8-1...8 bloody 1, to Brighouse! The centre forward wears glasses! It’s a loss get real. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 5:18 pm, Ted wrote: > Yeah - I

Re: [LU] Wolves

realising I didn’t say it…yes, I thought a draw would have been fair. Nick > On 20 Oct 2020, at 01:36, Nicholas Armit wrote: > > I don't know I thought the first 30 minutes was fantastic. Some great > football. Yes the second half not as good and they got to grips with us but a > draw was

Re: [LU] Wolves

Yeah - I agree Nick - I thought the first 30 mins was brilliant, Ayling was great. Thoroughly enjoyable. We were the better side first half, them second. I agree, a draw would have been fairer but I've no real complaints. (Bearing in mind it was 5 years ago yesterday that we got Steve fukcing

Re: [LU] Wolves

I don't know I thought the first 30 minutes was fantastic. Some great football. Yes the second half not as good and they got to grips with us but a draw was definitely merited. Nick On Monday, October 19, 2020, 06:31:47 PM EDT, John Lee via Leedslist wrote: A learning experience

Re: [LU] Wolves

A learning experience indeed. I’d like to see Pablo given a start - we need some guile, and whilst he’s not a long-term answer, he’s the best we’ve got. The way they pinned Dallas back and snuffed us out suggest Santo won the tactical battle, although a draw would have been merited imho. We

[LU] Wolves

That fell flat didn’t it. With the exception of Meslier, Koch and perhaps Rodrigo, no one was really on their game today. Unlucky goal again, but we’ve got to do much more with possession. That said, their CH Kilman was MOTM by a mile. Its all a learning experience. Nick

Re: [LU] Wolves

Hernandez is finished. He doesn't have the legs. -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of nat...@sky.com Sent: 09 March 2018 13:47 To: seanscr...@aol.com; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves I was talking purely

Re: [LU] Wolves

slist@gn.apc.org Sent: Friday, 9 March 2018, 12:57 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Hernandez "not up to it"? Seriously, Dave? -Original Message- From: nattan <nat...@sky.com> To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sen

Re: [LU] Wolves

. Cheers! Sean -Original Message- From: {broken-address} John Lee <bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; nattan <nat...@sky.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Fri, Mar 9, 2018 4:45 am Sub

Re: [LU] Wolves

Hernandez "not up to it"? Seriously, Dave? -Original Message- From: nattan <nat...@sky.com> To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Fri, Mar 9, 2018 3:15 am Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Lets go through each po

Re: [LU] Wolves

I agree with Dave's 6 or 7. GK, LB, CBx2, MF, W, F. & that is without the unlikely event of any of our players getting cherry-picked. I guess Ayling, Jannson, Saiz are the only ones at risk. KOT. Kevin Lewis Oracle System Administrator UK SBS Tel: 01793 867086 Email:

Re: [LU] Wolves

they got the money, or are they just playing at it?       From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2018, 9:19 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves   Damn you and your

Re: [LU] Wolves

they got the money, or are they just playing at it? From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2018, 9:19 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Damn you and your

Re: [LU] Wolves

ability to save before a match and go back and play again if you lose, that bought Me and Leeds multiple premiership and champion league wins in Football Manager games. Sent from my Mobile Original Message Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves From: nat...@sky.com To: Richard Naef ,Leeds List C

Re: [LU] Wolves

loan, find a new keeper (first team or back up) and a left back - so that is 4 at the absolute minimum Dave From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, 8 March 2018, 15:12 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves It's worth rem

Re: [LU] Wolves

It's worth remembering that the team put in some good performances early on in the season, so there is a decent team in there somewhere, confidence is a big factor in any team and that's a major issue with us. I don't think 6 or 7 are necessary for the first team to be contenders. We weren't

Re: [LU] Wolves

o find out if they are any good and there is only one way of finding that out Dave From: Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>; "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com> Sent: Thursday, 8 March 2018, 12:55 Subject: Re:

Re: [LU] Wolves

There were some things Saiz did last night that were head and shoulders above everyone else in the team. But as soon as he passed. On Thursday, March 8, 2018, 8:24:57 AM EST, Kevin Lewis (UK SBS) wrote: I think Dave summed it up pretty well. Especially the

Re: [LU] Wolves

I think Dave summed it up pretty well. Especially the 6 or 7 players needed before next season. As ever, I didn't think we were quite as bad as Rich thought individually, but agree that we have certainly got no better as a team under Heck. There seems to be no idea of how they are trying to play

Re: [LU] Wolves

Deffo a keeper error for the 3rd Dave he should have stayed on his line.  Given the circumstances though I think we have say he did ok however my overall impression wasn't that we'd found a new Nigel Martyn (or even Paul Robinson)  On Thursday, 8 March 2018, 10:55:38 GMT, nat...@sky.com

[LU] Wolves

Well that is the season over and out with a whimper not a bang We were well and truly outclassed in the absolutely 'last chance saloon'- we have known for a while that the play offs were out of our reach but last night was the final nail in the coffin, no "we still have 30 points to play for "

[LU] Wolves

I disagree (without being unduly negative) We did fight back in the 2nd half and grabbed a goal and enjoyed some good spells of possession, but I think Wolves were some way ahead of us in all departments by that time and more goals for them had an air of inevitability. "What ifs" are always a

[LU] Wolves

difficult one this - I would have love to have seen what would have happened if Vierra hadn't dived in on a yellow - really stupid and it means we're back to O'Kane and Philips for Barnsley.  At that time I thought we were really on top and Wolves had lost it completely. With Ekuban replacing

Re: [LU] Wolves 0 Leeds 1

Good win 1-0 with a young team. Sent from my iPad > On 22 Oct 2016, at 16:41, John Boocock wrote: > > Roofe 70 mins. > > Sent from the North > ___ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options:

[LU] Wolves 0 Leeds 1

Roofe 70 mins. Sent from the North ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Re: [LU] Wolves report

the club or fans) Dave From: rhys hodge <r.ho...@xtra.co.nz> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 10:20 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves report Thanks for the report Dave. Those of us overseas really look forward to these. I have enjoyed your reports

Re: [LU] Wolves report

) Dave From: rhys hodge <r.ho...@xtra.co.nz> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016, 10:20 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves report Thanks for the report Dave. Those of us overseas really look forward to these. I have enjoyed your reports throughout the

Re: [LU] Wolves report

, 20/4/16, nat...@sky.com <nat...@sky.com> wrote: Subject: [LU] Wolves report To: "Leeds List" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Date: Wednesday, 20, April, 2016, 7:49 PM This game had all the cliches 'end of season stroll' 'game of two halves' 'goal worth the admission fee

[LU] Wolves and this season

Both teams were pretty average yesterday - that Wolves are now 6th tells you everything about the 'quality' of the Championship. There were some bloody suspect performances yesterday - Berardi and Wooton - what exactly are they for? Wooton actually does make schoolboy error after error, whilst

Re: [LU] Wolves and this season

From lurkdom to a bit of a long rambling EMail in one easy move: This has been, without doubt, the season I questioned my support for my hometown club, genuinely, for the first time. Having now a semi allegiance to Stranraer Football Club due to personal circumstance (Although for the footy fans

Re: [LU] Wolves

] On Behalf Of leedssongs.com Sent: 27 October 2014 22:57 To: 'leeds list' Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Out of lurk mode to write two lines from the weekends events... (back in the old days it would have been a full report from pre and post match list meets, ascii maps, and scores on the doors

Re: [LU] Wolves

Nice one Oystein, well done for keeping the faith. -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of leedssongs.com Sent: 27 October 2014 22:57 To: 'leeds list' Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Out of lurk mode to write two lines

Re: [LU] Wolves

Out of lurk mode to write two lines from the weekends events... (back in the old days it would have been a full report from pre and post match list meets, ascii maps, and scores on the doors, but times they are changing, right?) Was over for the first time of the season, in Marriott with my

Re: [LU] Wolves

Do you really think he told his team to sit back at half time Dave ? I think he changed the tactics incorrectly to try and stem Wolves's wing play but I think we ran out of steam. It wouldn't have mattered what tactics Darko employed , Wolves were faster, fitter and better in the second half.

[LU] Wolves/Darko and further tales of ordinary madness

Darko - we played well against Rotherham and Wolves in the first halves (as well as we’ve seen for a while, to quote a few who saw it); then as badly as we’ve seen for a while in the second half of each - Sheff Wed we could have buried had their keeper not been on top form…and apparently

Re: [LU] Wolves/Darko and further tales of ordinary madness

I know what you're saying about fitness Nick, but for me it was obvious to me that 50% of our midfield was out on their feet pretty soon after the break. So whilst I think Darko's tactics helped I think fitness was the key to the second half, and also a Wolves team who are so used to winning.

Re: [LU] Wolves/Darko and further tales of ordinary madness

What is Hockaday doing now I wonder? Selling fish cloths door to door? He should never hve sacked Milanic: we played some good stuff under him and the wins would have come. Now what do we do? Sent from my iPhone On 26 Oct 2014, at 22:44, Nick n...@6haroldplace.co.uk wrote: Don’t disagree

Re: [LU] Wolves/Darko and further tales of ordinary madness

Him and junior Lewis are on gardening leave still. Junior was a guest on BBC non league show last Saturday Sent from my iPhone On 26 Oct 2014, at 15:59, Ian Murray ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com wrote: What is Hockaday doing now I wonder? Selling fish cloths door to door? He should never

[LU] Wolves

Superb game this Morrison making a difference On 24 Oct 2014, at 17:06, wayne callaghan ws.callag...@live.co.uk wrote: Harry Roberts is (an will forever be) A cowardly cunt who shot 3 unarmed men dead. They should let him rot inside. Wayne On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:24 pm,

Re: [LU] Wolves

Couldn't agree more, he's certainly an intelligent player. On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:28 pm, Richard Walker [1]richleed...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Superb game this Morrison making a difference On 24 Oct 2014, at 17:06, wayne callaghan ws.callag...@live.co.uk wrote:

Re: [LU] Wolves

Always rated him don't think he's had a chance mainly because of his injury. This is the best we've played this season so far for me - runners everywhere , purposeful passing , intelligent play. However I think Wolves are lively and it really could go either way. Really good game. On 25 Oct

Re: [LU] Wolves

This is the best we've played this season so far for me - runners everywhere , purposeful passing , intelligent play. agree we looked good 1st half, but seems to me we are playing to deep 2nd half, asking Wolves to attack in the hope of a goal on the counter. I'd much prefer we carried on

Re: [LU] Wolves

And it's1_1 On 25 Oct 2014 18:16, Richard Naef rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk wrote: This is the best we've played this season so far for me - runners everywhere , purposeful passing , intelligent play. agree we looked good 1st half, but seems to me we are playing to deep 2nd half,

Re: [LU] Wolves

Only one team in it at the mo On 25 Oct 2014, at 16:28, Dr Michael Benjamin m...@myray.com wrote: And it's1_1 On 25 Oct 2014 18:16, Richard Naef rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk wrote: This is the best we've played this season so far for me - runners everywhere , purposeful passing ,

[LU] Wolves

So I've been listening to the aftermath on Radio Leeds as I've been driving home and everyone is scratching their heads and wondering what happened between 45 and 46 minutes ? Noel Whelan is putting the blame at the change of formation. Playing Morrison as a right winger in an attempt to stop

[LU] Wolves

got a lot on this weekend so will be brief, First half we were good, the midfield won and kept the ball passing it with purpose, Morison and Antenucci looked like a proper partnership, reading each others play and linking up well.No surprise that the goal came when Morison put a lovely ball

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

: Tuesday, 12 February 2013, 0:20 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves match reports Thanks! Didn't sound like Morison had much of an impact. From: tim.whe...@talk21.com tim.whe...@talk21.com To: Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

. From: Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com To: tim.whe...@talk21.com tim.whe...@talk21.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013, 0:20 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves match reports Thanks! Didn't sound like Morison had much of an impact

[LU] Wolves match reports

Were there any for the Wolves game? I seem to have missed them ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

Well I listened to the game on YR and they were fairly optimistic, however I spoke to my mate who went who said it was the same old shite ( he is generally more pessimistic than me) Sent from my iPad On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com wrote: Were there any for the

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 20:02 Subject: [LU] Wolves match reports Were there any for the Wolves game? I seem to have missed them ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

=late_slip_costs_leeds_victory_at_wolves Tim W. From: Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com To: leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Monday, 11 February 2013, 20:02 Subject: [LU] Wolves match reports Were there any for the Wolves game? I seem to have

Re: [LU] Wolves match reports

Thanks! Didn't sound like Morison had much of an impact. From: tim.whe...@talk21.com tim.whe...@talk21.com To: Nicholas Armit arm...@yahoo.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:04 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves match

Re: [LU] Wolves

down again!     From: Richard Walker richleed...@yahoo.co.uk To: LEEDSLIST leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Saturday, 18 August 2012, 17:04 Subject: [LU] Wolves Quick match report cos I know you all saw it on tv. I was well happy with this performance. There were so

[LU] Wolves

Quick match report cos I know you all saw it on tv. I was well happy with this performance. There were so many new faces I spent the first half trying to work out who was who ? One player that was unmistakable was Austin who was everywhere putting in challenge after challenge - a great debut.

Re: [LU] Wolves

Diouf: sort that hair cut, mate, better to be bold than this... sorry folks, I can't help it... My man: the 18 year old...Byram... is he from the academy, or did Warnock transfer him in? That is the kind of stuff I like... The performance: goal was superb (incl build-up), first half was quite

Re: [LU] Wolves

Thought Green was having a great game until he got his injury. -Original Message- From: Øystein Bjøndal Lund Sent: 18/08/2012 19:31 To: 'LEEDSLIST' Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Diouf: sort that hair cut, mate, better to be bold than this... sorry folks, I can't help it... My man: the 18

[LU] Wolves

I think game is the most important opening day fixture we have had for a long time# Wilko promotion year proved that you can have an awful first day and still. go up but that year there was massive optimism and buzz around the place This season the loss of yet another star (snodgrass) the Bates

Re: [LU] Wolves

: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of DAVID NATTAN Sent: Friday, 17 August 2012 8:37 PM To: listleedslist Subject: [LU] Wolves I think game is the most important opening day fixture we have had for a long time# Wilko promotion year proved that you can

Re: [LU] Wolves

+1000 Subject: Re: [LU] Wolves Actually a very. optimistic. email. But shame. about the. constant grammatical. interruptions? What happened there Dave? I will be shouting at the big feckin' screen in my lounge room loud enough for Uncle Doctor Mikey to hear over the roar of the Kop

Re: [LU] Wolves

at once etc and I then have to go through and sort as best I can From: Peter Castlehouse dubca...@bigpond.com To: 'DAVID NATTAN' david.nat...@btinternet.com; 'listleedslist' leedslist@gn.apc.org Sent: Friday, 17 August 2012, 12:25 Subject: RE: [LU] Wolves

Re: [LU] Wolves

A bad workman ... Eh Peter? ;-) JMy l.aptop isx k,nadck,eredc - when i presxsx any ofv the l.ettersx on the bottojm l.ine 2 l.ettersx or adctifvitesx odcdcut andc then I needc to go through andc dcel.ete etdc# Needc to get it fvisxedc asxap# # Or to put it properly - my keypad is broken

[LU] Wolves Match on Setanta Australia

Coverage starts 9.40pm Sydney time ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate

Re: [LU] Wolves mismanaged || No 4 games 'trials'

I have heard from a good source that Bruce is very unlikely to be offered the wolves job. Steve Morgan didn't get home from his skiing holiday until yesterday morning and had already lined up candidates and a venue for interviews. Just goes to show how a good owner looks after his interests.

  1   2   >