tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: jenkins...@xtra.co.nz
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source writer conversion tool
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:10:50 +1300
>
> Hi
> I have some sources in basic forma
Hi
I have some sources in basic format whish i want to change to source writer
format. The instructions are as follows: "
Converting Your Source Citations
The Source Template Conversion Tool is reached from the Master Source List
by clicking the Options button and then choosing Source Template
Thank you
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Connie Sheets wrote:
> From: Connie Sheets
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer - Master Template Info question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 10:33 AM
> Will,
>
> It appears to be a glitch in
Okay... thanks.
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, ronald ferguson wrote:
> From: ronald ferguson
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer - Master Template Info question
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 9:22 AM
> Wil,
>
> I use the same one
Will,
It appears to be a glitch in the software. In the Evidence Explained
QuickCheck Models which use the term Collection (and on which the Legacy
templates are based), the name of the collection appears in the full citation,
not just the bibliography/source list. See pp. 312 and 318 of EE.
m: wba...@yahoo.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer - Master Template Info question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Hello!
>
> I used Source Writer to create a Master Source: Church Records> Church record
> books> Created at Local Level> Basic Format.
&
Hello!
I used Source Writer to create a Master Source: Church Records > Church record
books > Created at Local Level > Basic Format.
In "Collection," I entered Parish Registers. The term Parish Registers does not
appear as part of my citation in the Footnote/Endnote; but it does appear under
B
://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: ro...@thenavarres.com
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Conversion Tool
> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12
I'm new to this list, so please forgive me if this has been asked before.
I'm really excited about the Source Writer in Legacy 7. I have thousands of
sources created using older versions of Legacy and I want to get them
converted to the new format. When Legacy 7 was announced a conversion tool
wa
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
I must say I am not a big fan of how we are encouraged to use repository /
source / citations in Legacy.
Ideally I would prefer to refer to the GRO as the repository, an individual
birth certificate as a source and some useful infromation as the
for Victor L,
King and Betty J. Hackett, 10 Feb 1998; citing Nevada Marriage Book 210:
C923786, no. 71867.
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Trahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Hi, Kay!
I must say I am not a big fan of how we are encouraged to use repository /
source / citations in Legacy.
Ideally I would prefer to refer to the GRO as the repository, an individual
birth certificate as a source and some useful infromation as the citation
(for example 'named as father...', 'showed
Elizabeth Richardson wrote
So, Bill, when you look at a book at the library, do you cite the
library as the source? I have looked at the original State of Nevada
Index via Ancestry.com. Why would I need to go to Carson City to cite
the State of Nevada Index?
For any website such as Ancestry I
.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth
Richardson
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 12:00 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
So, Bill, when you look at a book at the library
just
aquired is as listed above.
Richard > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:43:39 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question> To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> > Richard:> > I have to disagree
somewhat. The Nevada Marriage Index at Anc
t; > -Original
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Elizabeth Richardson> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:47 PM> To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
Question> > True, this is an index onl
out my Mills EE
book again.
Jennifer
- Original Message
From: Kay Fordham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:52:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Jennifer -
I have a question on your second example bel
PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Richard:
I have to disagree somewhat. The Nevada Marriage Index at Ancestry.com is
strictly an index and does not contain images. Therefore, it is not
*exactly* like the US censu
- On Fri, 10/24/08, Steve Voght <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Steve Voght <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 1:55 PM
> I have to agree with William
TECTED]> wrote:
> From: William Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 1:39 PM
> Rich,
>
> Sorry, I disagree.
>
> Whilst I agree that it is unlike
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Richard:
I have to disagree somewhat. The Nevada Marriage Index at Ancestry.com is
strictly an index and does not contain images. Therefore, it is not
*exactly* like the US cen
thner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Ancestry has a copy of the original two indexes- note plural but they then
combined those into ONE database and indexed that database so yes- Amazon
did create the data
dex?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "William Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Elizabeth,
Does this
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Elizabeth Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 8:47 PM
> True, this is an index only, not the marriage record
>
(Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "William Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Elizabeth,
Does this get back to the argument that 'my source' is where I found the
October 24, 2008 9:47 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
True, this is an index only, not the marriage record documents themselves.
The original image of the index is at Ancestry, and was not created by
Ancestry. The index was created b
: Steve Voght
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
I have to agree with William -- in this case the index was explicitly
created by Ancestry. True, they used some else's data to compile it, but
there
liam Anderson" <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
>
>
> Rich,
>
> Sorry, I disagree.
>
> Whilst I agree that it is unlikely, it is just possible that Ancestry.com
&g
repository.
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "William Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
Rich,
Sorry, I dis
hotel room not included). Use the example for
US census records, changing the obvious differences.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, Kay Fordham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kay Fordham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
> To: "Lega
the example for
US census records, changing the obvious differences.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, Kay Fordham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kay Fordham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Question
> To: "Legacy User Group"
> Date
Using Legacy 7 Deluxe 7.0.0.55 Build
Tried the new Source Writer for the first time today and love it. I have a
question about it relating to E. Shown-Mills, "Evidence Explained." I'm
citing an Ancestry.com database entitled "Nevada Marriage Index, 1956-2005."
Ancestry.com, in their Source I
Will it include the Newfoundland Censuses?
Teresa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff
Rasmussen
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for Canadian Census
]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
===
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heeren
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for Canadian Census
I have an 1851 Agricultural census for an individua
===
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heeren
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for Canadian Census
I have an 1851 Agricultural census for an individual in Ontario
--- On Sun, 8/31/08, Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer for Canadian Census
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Sunday, August 31, 2008, 6:59 PM
I have an 1851 Agricultural census for an individual in
Onta
fer to have master sources for
census records broken up by county. Maybe that's just a personal preference,
though. Anyhow, I think a template for Canada needs to be made.
Jennifer
--- On Sun, 8/31/08, Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Jennifer:
I wrote directly to Sally and maybe I should not have. Here is what I
said:
Actually from 1841 until 1867, what is now Ontario was called Canada West
(and Quebec was Canada East). Prior to 1841, they were Upper Canada and Lower
Canada. So you have something from Reach Towns
I prefer to have
master sources for census records broken up by county. Maybe that's just a
personal preference, though. Anyhow, I think a template for Canada needs to
be made.
Jennifer
--- On Sun, 8/31/08, Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Heeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you, Kathy, I know I can use the old format & input it, that's what
I've done in the past.
Now, I'd like to use the SourceWriter for all my new sources but the
Canadian Agricultural Census seems to be an ungainly fit for it.
Sally
**
I'm not sure what doesn't look right. I just p
Im not sure what doesnt look right. I just put things into the fields
provided and arrange them until what comes out looks ok to me.
First was done in version 6 and the 2nd was done using the Sourcewriter.
Old format
[Census - Canada - Ontario - 1851 - Wellington County]
Puslinch Township,
Jessica,
The only thing that can be entered for a repository, and this is at the
Master Source Level, is the Call Number. If "Shelf 1 of master library"
is the way you find individual items in your library you could enter
that as the "Call Number" for the sources in your own library. Typically
Thanks Brian.
Is there not an area where you can make detail notes on a repository
item that does not flow to all instances of that repository?
Example if I want to note that the repository is my personal
library on 1,000 items, the way it is set up now is fine.
If I want to note on 20 of tho
We have a problem report recorded on this issue. The Repository Notes
filed should be greyed out to indicate that you cannot modify the field
when viewing it from the source. As others have indicated you need to
open the repository to edit that field.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia Corporati
If you want to add notes to a repository, you need to click on Edit in the
Repository window, then choose the Notes tab. Once you enter notes using
the Notes tab, they will then appear in this Notes window when you look at
the repository.
Dede Holden
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Jenny M Bens
Jessica Morgan wrote
I am adding an obituary source using the Source Writer Template of
Newspapers > Online Archives (issued by the publisher).
When in the Repository screen, I cannot type in the Notes field at the
bottom of the box.
Is this normal?
I think it's a bug.
--
Jenny M Benson
Click on Edit for the Repository and add your notes from there. In
the source window, it simply displays that is in the Repository notes
field.
Linda M.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Jessica Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am adding an obituary source using the Source Writer Template o
I am adding an obituary source using the Source Writer Template of
Newspapers > Online Archives (issued by the publisher).
When in the Repository screen, I cannot type in the Notes field at the
bottom of the box.
Is this normal?
Jess M
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamily
ces it may not matter which one you select as long as the resulting
citation is formatted the way you want.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Quest
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:08 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subjec
I can't seem to figure out which template to use for recording copies of
original death certificates that I have obtained from County Clerks. Can
someone help me with this?
Thanks in advance,
Karima
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived
eoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Quest
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:08 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer - Death Certi
It's got my vote.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Robert57P via Gmail
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:58 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer opti
: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer option
I remember this being asked, but don't recall it ever being answered.
If one has OPTIONS, CUSTOMIZE, SOURCES and has "SOURCEWRITER" ticked in
lower left, then you are "forced" to always use Sourcewr
I remember this being asked, but don't recall it ever being answered.
If one has OPTIONS, CUSTOMIZE, SOURCES and has "SOURCEWRITER" ticked in
lower left, then you are "forced" to always use Sourcewriter. No way to use
the "basic" system when you are updating someone - without leaving that
per
08, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Templates
As reluctant as I am to ask for new "goodies" at this time, I will!
I think it would be real neat if we could add our own Source Templates in
a manner similar to adding ne
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 8:43 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Templates
Jan,
These will come with time. I'm not going to say "tomorrow" nor "soon".
I
think we've learned from that. It could be done now but with a little
Hi Jan,
> does anyone know if there are plans to be able to add templates
> to the source writer such as UK Census, UK Civil Registrations etc.
I expect by now you will have seen Geoff's post on this subject, where
he said:
"Hopefully this next week we'll be creating specific templates for th
Don Cook wrote
I think it would be real neat if we could add our own Source Templates
in a manner similar to adding new Event Definitions.
You can pretty much do that now - just use the old style of Sourcing
rather than the SourceWriter. Create the Source any way you want it and
next time y
that what
you're seeing just follows the later version rather than being anything that
you're doing wrong.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sub
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
Thanks for the response, Kirsten, though it's definitely not the one
I wanted. I was really looking forward to the Source Writer. If the
goal post is going to be moved every ten years or so, I
Does anyone know where the Source Conversion Tool is? It is not under Master
Lists, Sources, Options as stated in the help.
Scott Failmezger
- Original Message -
From: "Kris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:15 AM
To:
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source
citations according to "Evidence Explained" -- which I don't have. I
have "Evidence!" from 1997. I didn't think the
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source
citations according to "Evide
, Lexington, ED ___, page. ___.
Mary Beth
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Kris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Kris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Friday, June 6, 2008, 11:08 PM
Thanks for the response, Kirsten,
Like a big kid at Christmas, little disappointed that all features not
working but like a child my disappointment soon forgotten as I start
exploring new features. Well done to all at Millennia!!!
Anyway, now to my question - does anyone know if there are plans to be
able to add templates to the s
n
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Bennett
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 7:31 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer Templates
Anywa
st follows the later version rather than being anything that
you're doing wrong.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
I
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:16 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
It's my understanding
ree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source
citations according to "Evidence Explained" -- which I don't have. I
have "Evidence!" from 1997. I didn't think there would be much
difference, but so f
It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source
citations according to "Evidence Explained" -- which I don't have. I
have "Evidence!" from 1997. I didn't think there would be much
difference, but so far there is. Since no one's complained til now, I
figure I must have done
Well, here I go with the questions. What is this mysterious Source
Writer that's been talked about forever? I don't see it anywhere. Add
New Source looks the same as ever, just a new box for Source Detail...
--
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/j
71 matches
Mail list logo
