Joe and all,
How does Crispy-Songbird.god sound joe? ;) Oh yes, of course there
are no trailing "-'s"... Is that ok with you Louis or Mike?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a
.GOD special
Shall I register it in your name Jeff? Or in crispies name? Someone has
already register icann.god.
http://god.pccf.net/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?icann.god
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
How does Crispy-Songbird.god sound joe? ;) Oh yes, of
Joe and all,
Sure, that would be fine. Send me the bill. And than I will grant it
to either Kent or a worthy non-profit sunrise +20 supporter organization.
By the way does Sunrise +20 work with your .GOD TLD as a policy
Joe? I hope not. But if so, randomly select the best 20 possibilities
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
Sure, that would be fine. Send me the bill. And than I will grant it
to either Kent or a worthy non-profit sunrise +20 supporter organization.
By the way does Sunrise +20 work with your .GOD TLD as a policy
Joe? I hope not.
Joe and all,
Ok thank you Joe. ;)
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
Sure, that would be fine. Send me the bill. And than I will grant it
to either Kent or a worthy non-profit sunrise +20 supporter organization.
By the way does
Sorry Jeff - forgot to address the rest of your question. I've been busy
with people sending in so many queries to dot.god.
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
By the way does Sunrise +20 work with your .GOD TLD as a policy
Joe?
That does not work with .GOD. Were not having any of
A censored communication of interest to all of us in tld's.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:11:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CENSORED
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Give it up, Please!!
Hello:
The article fails to mention the history of this
I love being difficult and frankly we've had enough press for today. My
mother has advised me its one of the things I do well - apart from
bringing her endless joy and entertainment. Of course, as usual, names
have been censored to protect the innocent.
Regards
Joe Baptista
--
Joe and all,
Thank you Joe for addressing my question so promptly and directly.
We [INEGroup] are pleased to see that sunrise +20 is not to become
a policy with the .GOD gTLD. I hope that the DOC/NTIA and ICANN
can take a lesson from this wise and stability minded decision.
!Dr. Joe Baptista
More censored reporter stuff. Good for discussion.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 13:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CENSORED
Subject: Re: reporter query
On Thu, 18 May 2000, CENSORED wrote:
Just some general questions if you
John the Repoman wrote:
P.S.: I wonder how much it would cost to mail every domain(s) registrant in
the world a brief opinion questionaire (even by snail mail (argh)- postcard
even - no ppd return envelope necessary) on major issues under
consideration by ICANN to get a feel for the
The cloest thing to this was the IFWP consensus calls.
I still have them here in a file folder; the disconnect between them
and what is, is major.
At 02:12 PM 5/18/00 -0700, Greg Skinner wrote:
John the Repoman wrote:
P.S.: I wonder how much it would cost to mail every domain(s) registrant
at work
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Digitel - Ken Stubbs)
To: "Richard J. Sexton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [IFWP] Re: (OT) Re: Sunset for sunrise
Date: M
Jeff Williams wrote:
DOn't forget Joe that Ken was elected illegitimately as the history
of the DNSO clearly shows...
The DNSO is an invention of CORE and the CORE leadership. Mssrs.
Stubbs, Crispin, Abril i Abril, Sola, and the the others from CORE
who co-opted the DNSO with the ICANN
Michael and all,
I can't disagree with you proposed remedy here Michael. I
for one appreciate you frankness in this regard.
Michael Sondow wrote:
Jeff Williams wrote:
DOn't forget Joe that Ken was elected illegitimately as the history
of the DNSO clearly shows...
The DNSO is an
Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have
to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this
discussion to have a clue who [deleted] means.
ok
At 06:23 PM 5/17/00 -0700, you wrote:
Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have
to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this
ONly people who are reading this list now will know that (Or people
who read enough of the archives to find this thread). Someone just
surfing in at random stands a good chance of NOT knowing and getting
the impression the list isn't a complete reflection of the message s.
Come to think of it,
John the Repoman and all,
John, you have aptly captured in your own adept manner the
scam that ICANN has become to anyone that has half a brain,
and exercises it just a tad. ;) Maybe we should hang a label on
it as "ICANN-ISCAM"? Has a ring to it doesn't it? ;)
As for Kent, well the
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a
.GOD special domain for Kent and Songbird. I know you can come
up with something wholesome! ;) Send me the bill on the registration.
songbird.god is taken. any other choices? or
I was not consulted. Jamie
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:
As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating Committees, without any visible public input.
The announcement is at
I'm on WG-B, and am an At Large Member (awaiting, along with everyone else,
my pin.)
I ***was not*** consulted.
Judith Oppenheimer
800 Dot Com News, Intelligence, Consulting FREE Daily HeadsUp Headlines.
"...superb real-time source..." "...invaluable..."
"...indispensable..."
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:05:57AM -0400, Dan Steinberg wrote:
For that matter, neither was I.
James Love wrote:
I was not consulted. Jamie
Neither was I, and I don't believe anyone else was either. When
people around ICANN talk about "outreach" or "broad diversity" or
"consensus",
In order to test this intuition, I would be very interested in hearing
from anyone who was actually consulted by ICANN prior to this
announcement, whatever their affiliation.
Not consulted. Disappointed, but not surprised.
Was anyone on the original Membership Advisory Committee consulted?
I
Ellen Rony wrote
Was anyone on the original Membership Advisory Committee consulted?
The MAC served its purpose - to distract and immobilize user
opposition to ICANN - and is now forgotten.
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U.
Well, I was on the MAC and I forgot to mention it last time round
when I mentioned that I hadnt been consulted.
Ellen Rony wrote:
In order to test this intuition, I would be very interested in hearing
from anyone who was actually consulted by ICANN prior to this
announcement, whatever
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Repoman wrote:
( Answer to !Dr Joe: Yes I'm new here and grateful to be able to share my simple
views on topics utilizeing my simple instincts honed by 'hands on brick and
mortar' as I suspect you are as well.
Yup
Btw: What the hell is a 'Fud'?My guess:
At 02:51 AM 5/15/00 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Btw: What the hell is a 'Fud'?My guess: Funfounded drivel"?)
FUD = Fear - Uncertainty - and Doubt.
Hey, could we change it to "fucking unfounded drivel"? That's good.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: [IFWP] Re: (OT) Re: Sunset for sunrise
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:33:46 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
glad to hear your
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:07:11 -0400
From: David Honig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (OT) Re: Sunset for sunrise
At 03:09 AM 5/15/00 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Well - simply put ICANN runs 13 root
At 05:12 PM 5/15/00 -0400, Joe Baptista wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 13:07:11 -0400
From: David Honig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (OT) Re: Sunset for sunrise
At 03:09 AM 5/15/00 -0400, !Dr. Joe
Richard Sexton wrote:
I'm not sure it's possible to enfore a charter based on semantics; the
ony chartered TLDs that have been even moderately successful are those
which limit the charter to a specifit (or specific type) or organization.
Do we care? Say .per and .nom were for personal names and
At 11:15 PM 5/11/00, Jay Fenello wrote:
FYI:
Sorry,
Should have added that this
intro was from icannwatch.org
ICANN's Latest Outrage
Bret Fausett, a long-time ICANN observer, describes how ICANN kept its
plans to create a one-sided Nomination Committee secret. It was easy:
ICANN just
- - Begin Forwarded Message -
This virus works on the honor system:
If you're running a variant of unix or linux, please forward this
message to everyone you know and delete a bunch of your files at
random.
--- End of Forwarded Message
--
Patrick and all,
Patrick Corliss wrote:
Hi Jeff
On Wed 10 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Patrick, you need to learn to turn wrap on in your E-Mailer or don't
sent your response as an attachment.
Patrick Corliss wrote:
Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
It doesn't have to suck. It could blow. Or bite. Or -suck, or -bite
or -blow.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ph-1.613.473.1719
It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR
Verizon is the new name of the Bell Atlantic-GTE merger.
BA pre-emptively registered "verizonsucks.com"
Yes, well... One supposes that they'd be in a position to know.
So an organization registered "verizonreallysucks.com"
Showing a rather pathetic lack of a sense of humor, not to
John and all,
Areidiots.com and Areidiots.org are available. ;)
Yes you would THINK that Bell Atlantic and GTE would be
in position to know. But I have found over the past 10 years of so
that this is as likely not the case as it is... ;)
John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
Verizon is
From ICANN-announce:
ICANN Launches CEO Search, Retains Christopher Mill to Assist
snip
The Board is looking for candidates of demonstrated leadership,
managerial competence, technical credibility, and international experience
who will work to serve the entire Internet community, from
Dean Robb wrote:
Yesterday I heard an interesting commercial on the radio. It was for a
regional bank, announcing their new online banking service component. What
caught my attention was their address: www.bankname.ORG. Yes, that's
.ORG. For a business.
Selling .ORG registrations to
Dean Robb wrote:
While I agree that ICANN needs to address the issue; I lay the blame for
the problem squarely at the feet of NSI.
While it's true that NSI's "profit at any cost" attitude towards the
Internet is the fundamental cause of the corruption of .ORG, ICANN
is supposed, with all its
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 00:42:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Letter about use of Procurement Control to Privatize Public
Resources
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 00:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ronda Hauben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Wawa A. Ngenge wrote:
Would they control content for NON-CHRISTIAN communities too?
Wawa
Why would they want to? The point of using tld's to filter content is to
provide christian groups with control of their own name space. The same
applies for family values groups.
Geez.
Not only that but ns1 is the primary and used to get listed first, now it's
listed second. Which nameserver is the primary and which is/are secondaries
is what you are asked when you register the domain and the informationn as
to which one was which was only stored in one place anywhere -
Jim Dixon wrote:
Not those of us who run UNIX ;-)
Believe me, if I had a year or two to spend learning Unix or Linux,
I'd switch over. I hate M$ as much as anyone. But it's the same old
story: having gotten roped into MS-DOS years ago, and then following
along in the progression through
Micheal,
Viruses aren't MS's fault and MS is very good at some things.
No need to be suckered. Netscape is easy to install, and I think it has a
cleaner e-mail interface, if not as feature-full.
The frustrating part with MS is that its applications are so inconsistent. Some
parts are very
Is this real or is this bullshit? bogus telephone number, but netsolbiz
look real enough. The EU has not sanctioned this. This looks alot like
fraud and misinformation. Consumers should be warned.
Once again - the eu has not sanctioned this. No mechinisim is in place by
the eu to proceed to
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:00:48 -0400
From: Scott Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new tld's
We are actively involved with the current initiatives through ICANN for new
gTLD namespace.
We are also working on adding support for
At 10:12 PM 4/18/00 -0700, you wrote:
As irony would have it given recent discussions here about .union and
.sucks, our local county newspaper, the Marin Independent Journal, ran a
feature article today, "Online whines with a bitter aftertaste."
Dan Parisi , founder of Whitehouse.com (a porn
I spent a lot of effort on other forums to recruit people to join Workgroup C
and have an impact on its efforts, only to see the Names Council use those
very numbers as a reason to ignore its results.
Greg Skinner wherever you are: I hope this answers your question as
to why I didn't become
From: "Judith Oppenheimer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Hartman, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Wg-B@Dnso. Org" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [bwg+] RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 1:42 PM
To: Wg-B; Chicoine, Caroline; Paul M. Kane
Cc: Registrars List; 'Louis Touton'; 'Andrew McLaughlin'; 'names
council'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Michael Schneider'
Subject: [wg-b] RE: [registrars] Re: [council] suggested draft
resolution for today's NC call
To
Any dns server can operate as a root server. If a dns server runs the
"." zone - then it's s root server.
Example - if I wanted to operate a root server using the ORSC roots, as i
do on mine - I secondary the file from the ORSC primary root server.
Example:
I would change my named.conf file
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
Before people get all excited about alternative
roots, think about liability...
For example what happens if an alternative
root has incorrect information??
That's not possible
Ie. Let's say an alternative root has Buy.com
pointing to some
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Bob Garth wrote:
Joe, thank you, that was great(!!!), and yes, it answers most of my
questions, but one. At what version of bind/named needs to be used that
supports .db (database files) other than the obvious, the most recent?
Just wondering if it's nessacary for me
There's a few problems with the namespace roots which I'll spell out here.
1. Non of the namespace root servers provide for zone transfers of the
root. Therefore it is impossible to determine what tld space is in them.
2. Lack of co-operation - when John Hunt enumerated the namespace he
James Love wrote:
We are more likely to be involved in proposals for other civil
society TLDs.
Those proposals will be treated by the INTA, WIPO, and the DNSO NC
with the same disdain as .union or anything else that they see as
complicating or intruding on their hegemony over the traditional
Roger Cochetti says:
A decision to start now with at least two new "proof of concept" TLDs,
by means that allow careful yet rapid deployment, will not in any way
limit ICANN's approach to future namespace expansion.
This is disingenuous and untrue. The first ones will obviously
become a
Roger Cochetti says:
In other words, put into immediate effect a measure which is
currently being hotly disputed and which runs directly counter to
the interests of a large percentage of Internet users.
In the spirit of gaining new experience and as a reflection of the rapid
global growth
As irony would have it given recent discussions here about .union and
.sucks, our local county newspaper, the Marin Independent Journal, ran a
feature article today, "Online whines with a bitter aftertaste."
Dan Parisi , founder of Whitehouse.com (a porn site) has spent
approximately $100,000 to
"A. Henderson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I heard recently about IOD and their .web registry, I thought I
would go and register some .web domains. However, as I learned, most of
the "good" domains had already been taken. Trying to find a good .web to
register seemed just about as hard as
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: YJ Park [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: i-dns.net
I think it's time for a history lesson on i-dns. i-dns is an
some entertainment ..
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 20:43:29 -0700
From: Alan DeRossett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: www.tv domains Auction?
We have a TradeMark on a name and would like to register it in the TLD
.TV However it looks
Karl and all,
Indeed I am sorry that you take such offense at my attempting to
keep interested parties informed. I also see that you have a tendency
to contradict your self in your response. I also noticed that in your
response you also cross posted. As I recall you, Andy, William
and even
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Milton Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED], James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Non-commercial TLDs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Nc-tlds]
Joe and all,
I also have to agree with both your potential scenario and Dave
Crockers comments here as well. But I somehow doubt that
China will in the end block all gTLD (DNS Entirely) and will
modify their tendency for pull business practices to some expectable
level, eventually or risk
http://www.theregister.co.uk/000410-04.html
The Register: Good morning, Mr. Cohen. Can you give us a brief
rundown on the domain name situation and ICANN's tireless
efforts to straighten it out?
Cohen: Yata-yata. Me, me, me. Yata, yata.
The Register: Really, Mr. Cohen? That's
Although this is off-topic, I thought I'd forward it because (1) I
like to read what Noel Chiappa writes, and (2) this is one of those IETF
threads where people discuss how things might have gone differently
if certain design and implementation decisions had been made differently.
Date: Wed, 12
Richard, I have not seen any comments from you in any of the DNSO archives,
even the public comment areas, at least in the past few months. I don't
see how you are going to have any kind of input into the process if you
don't participate.
--gregbo
At 11:54 AM 4/12/00 -0700, you wrote:
Richard, I have not seen any comments from you in any of the DNSO archives,
even the public comment areas, at least in the past few months. I don't
see how you are going to have any kind of input into the process if you
don't participate.
I participated in
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: YJ Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Opinion from China regarding new gTLD.
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, YJ Park wrote:
2, The NEW gTLDs will
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/000410-04.html
And just who was he referring to when he says "dissidents who were
known in some cases to have received financial support for attendance
at meetings from NSI"
That's just Cohen farting the same
Looks like the horseshit in the GA keeps getting thicker. I have asked
Mr. Cohen personally if he is one of the pedophiles involved in the Fort
Lauderdale scandal which has been supressed here in Canada.
Mr Cohen has choosen to not respond.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Harald
This is the kind of stability the DoC has broght us.
Let's think back, way back to how this all started.
You registered a domain name in say, 1986. Then 10 years
later you got a bill. Why? Because a small number of people
decided you would.
Interpol losing it's name is just rediculous.
The chief GA horseshitter speaks. The GA was held up as an example of
what not to do and Harald continues with new ground.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Once we've got a GA membership, we've got to decide about how the GA votes.
I'd suggest keeping things
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:03:34 -0700
From: Kent Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from Mark C. Langston on Mon, Apr
10, 2000 at 10:52:21AM -0700
Pardon the length of this...
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:46:43 -0700
To: "'William X. Walsh'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [wg-c] Another gTLD starts up
From: "Christopher Ambler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even that would be a step forward that I would welcome.
--
Joe and all,
Yes I posted them to the DNSO GA list for informational
purposes as Mo, was having a problem in getting on the
DNSO GA list for some odd reason. And yes, it seems that
WXW forgot to take his prozack again :(
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Well - those censored messages are now
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
Yes I posted them to the DNSO GA list for informational
purposes as Mo, was having a problem in getting on the
DNSO GA list for some odd reason. And yes, it seems that
WXW forgot to take his prozack again :(
I know. He's so
William and all,
For some of you who may be new on this list. William X. Walsh
has had a long standing dislike and feud with Joe Baptista, as well
as myself amongst a few others. Anything that WXW may say in
response to posts coming from Joe, myself, Joop, and a few others
should be read
here is a recent private email exchange I had concerning the big picture.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: censored
Cc: censored
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, censored wrote:
If this
Here's more censored stuff of this very interesting conversation.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 04:47:51 +0100 (GMT)
From: censored
To: censored
Cc: censored
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
# censored, I agree that restricting the content of a post to the DNSO
# GA
Well - those censored messages are now in the public domain. So here's a
copy of the full message. Poor WXW is seeing ghosts again.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:17:01 -0700
From: Jeff Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
One only needs to review the archives of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to read
some of the sexually explicit things you said about Elisabeth
Portenouve (sp?), to fully realise just _who_ needs to learn some
"serious" manners.
There's the pity. I'll
This is beutiful. Paul Vixie joined the opensrs project mailing lists for
the purpose of defending himself. Wonderful.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:17:24 -0700
From: Paul A Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Bilow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
my reply to vixie.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul A Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mike Bilow [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Wonderful. This is a first. Paul
Ok, all but 1.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 01:18:02PM -0400, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
At 10:05 AM 4/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
http://offer.networksolutions.com/go/t1/surv1/
Note question 13.
Kinda begs the question "which has more validity, 30 or so people
ni working-group-C all with vested
That's an interesting twist. I don't think the Canadian courts would much
care about a lower US courts decision. But the location of control is a
valid point. I'll pass it on.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to
David Harris made a suggestion to update the root servers in real time and
I was wondering if NSI found this a practicle solution for implimentation.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:01:29 -0400
From: David Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: !Dr.
ICANN wrote:
The DNSO Names Council invites the Internet community to comment
on these reports and the issues raised by them.
What about the general Assembly of the DNSO? You remember, the
"bottom-up", "consensus" community? Doesn't that exist any more? Did
you destroy it by demoralizing
ICANN wrote:
The DNSO Names Council invites the Internet community to comment
on these reports and the issues raised by them.
What about the General Assembly of the DNSO? You remember, the
"bottom-up", "consensus" community called on by the White Paper to
form ICANN and the DNSO? Are you
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
David Harris made a suggestion to update the root servers in real time and
I was wondering if NSI found this a practicle solution for implimentation.
http://www.ultradns.com.
Greg Skinner wrote:
There have been commercial registrations in .us for quite some time
now.
And I tell you, once again, that although they have never been
disallowed they are not the principal purpose of .us, as the RFC
makes clear.
Your extrapolation from some commercial use of .us, to .us
Michael Sondow wrote:
Greg Skinner wrote:
There have been commercial registrations in .us for quite some time
now.
And I tell you, once again, that although they have never been
disallowed they are not the principal purpose of .us, as the RFC
makes clear.
Your reading of the RFC is
Greg Skinner wrote:
Your reading of the RFC is different than mine, as I have it in front
of me now and see no language stating (or implying) anything about the
principal purpose of .us.
You don't? What about the following, which you yourself quote:
Any computer in the United States
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
Paul did not resign because of this.
then why did he resign?
baptista Incidentally - Paul Vixie also is the sendmail programmer,
No, he is not. The ISC generously sponsors the sendmail ftp site and
sendmail-announce mailing list.
If you
Mikael Pawlo wrote:
I hope this is sufficient answer to your question.
Can you tell us, please, what you believe to be the GAC involvement
in the Swedish Government's decision to interfere in
self-regulation?
Michael Sondow
The next BIND Survey - which will start in a few months will specifically
test for dns pointing to alternate roots - and the question should be
settled then.
Your analysis is a bit faulty here. You've made an analysis more
appropriately applied to a standalone nameserver and not a root server.
This isn't funny, you know. Many people, myself included, worked
very hard to present proposals for a reorganization of .us that
would preserve it for public interest use, as it was intended.
For the record, the original intent of the .us domain included
commercial use. See RFC 1480.
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
I think it's very funny Micahel. The country that thinks it
can cotrol the Internet and dicate world wide practice
has THE most screwed up domains on the planet.
In my opinion, this can be fixed by introducing some "portable" SLDs
in .us.
--gregbo
301 - 400 of 4415 matches
Mail list logo
