.stopwar.org.uk/
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
OK. So how many london.pm'ers read the popbitch messageboard?
http://www.popbitch.com/flat/bored.html
I just ask because it is the single biggest reason I hate MySQL at the
moment.
That, and badly written Perl.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:09:42AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > OK. So how many london.pm'ers read the popbitch messageboard?
> > http://www.popbitch.com/flat/bored.html
> > I just ask because it is the single biggest reason I hate My
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:08:02PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > OK. So how many london.pm'ers read the popbitch messageboard?
> Never heard of it.
Popbitch has been mentioned before at london.pm meets. Plus, as simon says,
a URL of his has
| RCPT TO
| RCPT TO
:
| DATA
and instead opens up as many connections as it can to the remote mailserver
wasting bandwidth and hammering both ends.
Its delivery strategy after a backlog is also crap, because it's just FIFO.
MBM (really really anti-qm**l)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:00:55PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > > The trouble is that practically all mailers will write the queue
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:01:59PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm trying to keep the thing stable (I knew I couldn't run away from
> > sysadmin for long...), and the board hits MySQL to the extent that all
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:22:23AM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:00:55PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>
> All the messages are individual.
Right, well that changes things...
> > > This is also the standard a
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:01:59PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> > > Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I&#
> 194.202.72.80:
> > Error during DNS PTR lookup for 80.72.202.194.in-addr.arpa:
> > No such domain [Irritated]
> > 550 Your system has had many errors while trying to send us mail.
> >
> > -- This is a copy of the message, including all t
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:04:04PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:22:23AM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> > Please gents I did not want to restart the holy warn of MTA's - just how
> > to write a mailer in perl that manages mulitple [children|threads
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:49:53PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > What's your plan if you get a 4xx error at any stage?
> If its based on a perl client I'll probably queue everything via an MTA
> that is not a 221 OK. I know this is repetiti
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:47:03PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now, we've got one running under linux-emulation in FreeBSD, as we couldn't
> > persuade it to compile without threads, and for some extremely cra
rs to understand the transfer of
responsibility concept for delivery of the message or a bounce. And,
if that weren't enough, the configuration of whsmithonline, who not
only have an invalid EHLO line, but have a non-backed-off retry set
to 2 mins, I don't know what ma
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 04:21:32PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:44:10PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:22:07PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > > Server-side Javascript is actually rather nice as a language, but it&
the first part again, I think that the part that the
companies have a right to is *the implementation of the idea that you write
for them*. If you have an idea for something, and code it in your own time,
then I don't see that they could possibly (even under the contract) lay
claim to it, as i
y and lathos
> probably also qualify as far as I can tell. Marcel used to work in London
Lucy is definitely in the UK. lathos has now unsub'ed, and he'll probably
be staying in Oxford, if he decides to take his job with OUCS.
> (don't know whether he still does). Anyone else?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:58PM +0200, Marcel Grunauer wrote:
> amazonDaq DalaD 'ach yIje'Qo'
I tried running this through rot13, it didn't produce anything more sane,
what was it supposed to be?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
s it.
>I wonder if this license is legally enforcable, considering it's
>1) a click-thru
>2) more than a little vague in its definition of 'Potentially Viral Software'
5 letters: 'u','c','i','t','a'.
>What next from the M$ legal FUDmongers?
>'Intellectual Property Carcinogens'?
*snicker*
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] (you have
got that set up correctly, right?)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:06:14PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Mark Blackman wrote:
> > ok, if you insist, RG1 7NY, that's Reading for the metropolitan
> > utopianists
> SE16 2DZ
Home E2
Work W4
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:59:11AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Lee Goddard wrote:
> > perl -e "while (1){rand>0.5 ? print'\\' : print'/'}"
> perl -e "print chr 47+45*int rand 2 while 1"
&g
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 10:28:55AM +0100, Lee Goddard wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Byng-Maddick
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:40:06PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > > On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:34:49
efore I get
flamed to oblivion. :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
way I am going to make a screensaver setuid.
Do you count xlock as a screensaver? If so, there has to be some setuid-
alike thing, which allows the system password to be verified...
Of course PAM comes with its own little binary to do this, which is the
only setuid bit.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-M
prefer a decent hi-fi radio anyday (fx: looks towards
his Cambridge Audio and NAD amp...)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:17:07AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:35:09PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > > /me *so* wants a wavefinder + linux drivers for same.
> > I didn't get what
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:53:48AM +0200, Robin Szemeti wrote:
[MTA wars]
Use exim, you can have embedded perl, which means you can customise the
550 sod off spammer
reply :-)
(and also the various "relay denied" type of replies too. :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EM
ebserver (eg, take off a SessionID string from the beginning of a
URL, so that all relative urls just work). That's where the power comes
from.
The reason that you link in code into your exim is to prevent the fork()ing
and exec()ing of perl or procmail or whatever, you have the loaded
interpr
o do is sign
the certificate to allow it to relay, rather than having to add it into
the config.
Alternatives are POP before SMTP, ssh tunnelling of the SMTP traffic,
SMTP AUTH (preferably with a CRAM-MD5 auth).
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:52:18PM +0100, Barbie [home] wrote:
> > > Greg (Age 26.95)
> > robin aged 37.99178
> (36.75 and a bit)
Lee, how about adding birthdays to the world map?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:41:03PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> 15%. Suspiciously C/C++ is at 21%. WhoTF uses C/C++ to develop
> web apps??
At least one of the places I interviewed at does.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 08:59:27AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 12:41:03PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> > > 15%. Suspiciously C/C++ is at 21%. WhoTF uses C/C++ to develop
> > > web app
> $ host -l -a -v pm.org | grep NS
eek, those are horribly short timeouts for NS records...
oh well.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
even if that's not true in Tcl8
with the internal list implementations.
I like Perl too. And C. Not so fond of Java. Am trying to learn Haskell.
Does that make me weird?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:06:38PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:36:35PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > I like Perl too. And C. Not so fond of Java. Am trying to learn Haskell.
> > Does that make me weird?
> No, i don't think so. But prog
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 05:12:45PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:54:01PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > My big beef with Java is that having *forced* you into an OO model
> > (something recognised both by Perl and C++ as being bad), its o
acle, and MySQL can be made to fly too) Perl is the
> limiting factor, not the database. YMMV, IMO, etc
:-) This can be the case. It depends on your disks.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 10:24:52AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is more than can be said for MySQL with the horror that is MyISAM.
> So don't do it - use one of the three other schemes that pretend to
> have lo
he equivalent of a 'select * from systables'.
> in the mysql database in mysql
> you have such things as the tables table, etc.
This is purely for access control, and hence irrelevant to the point in
question.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
t; 5p to charity for each grammar mistake pointed out in my posts?
I'm sure the charities would be happy. :-)
MBM (25p (+ another two) straight away... :-)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
beard).
No, definitely not. :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
may be surprised. :-)
> % perl try.pl
> 2
This seems more sensible behaviour to me.
It smells generally like one of those things that isn't defined. I think you
are perfectly reasonable in stating either 1 or 2 with appropriate reasons.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
you run out of glyphs, as has been said elsewhere.
File modes are usefully specified in octal, because they are represented by
3 bit values: rwx and then the u+s,g+s,o+t bits.
I'm not convinced that representing ascii in octal is that good, but some
people seem to like doing it.
MBM
--
M
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 05:02:12PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:58:59PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > Octal doesn't fit conveniently into a bytewise arithmetic, you end up using
> > only 2 of the 3 bits the top three allows you to s
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 05:06:44PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > > There was a period when it looked quite likely that a 36-bit word would
> > > be the norm, too...
> > 9 hex digits. Ugh.
&
and a good hard fsck
> Waving dead chickens not work?
I wouldn't imagine so, the SCSI deities like goat sacrifices better. :-)
MBM (dead chickens are something else)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
h the wording of that petition.
Please post US-Centric crap elsewhere.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 02:26:52AM -0700, Dave Cross wrote:
> From: Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 9/14/01 10:09:26 AM
> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Denny John wrote:
> >> >> - Forward this Portion to Friends -
>
it to. And I can't sign the ing petition!
So please try and understand what I posted, and read it. I quoted the bit
of the wording I didn't like. Maybe now you'll understand. However I think
we've got to stop being so ridiculous about this and get on with our lives.
Look forward rather than back.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:45:21PM +0100, Sue Spence wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > Sure, I'm just getting rather fed up of having "Attacks on the good ole'
> > democratic US state" shoved up my nose. I do feel sorry for the friends
> > and fami
nipped of html of the
> + could you mail me off list with a snippet of html of the
*** Hunk #1 of 1 failed
:-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
e with GPG, you
should really be trying to get the 64bit IDs rather than the 32bit ones.
What about where people have multiple email addresses ? eg, there is no
key for [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there is for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:13:44PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2001 17:01:08 +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > What happens if they are two valid keys?
> The module would have to break on any ambiguity. I suspect the reason
> this isn't implemented in any OpenPGP
when
you send messages encrypted with that key it will be evil dave who decrypts
them. However, that "Mickey Mouse" means nothing to me.
I therefore shouldn't be trusting your signature to verify anybody else's
identity. The email bit is a red herring and is rather like a name.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
k is rather more subtle.
Why is a name better than an email address, surely an email address is better
at uniquely identifying the name. Suppose I put an identity:
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as well as the standard
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now suppose
who doesn't
get the mail...
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
m people who
> I do not know personally because I am starting to wonder if the whole
> premise of keysigning parties is flawed.
Depends. It really comes down to what you trust other people's signatures to
mean.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
sure that the the key distributed with
the browsers is, in fact, theirs. That, and the actual management of the
*real* root key.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
Yes, i know this should be scribotted
> Yes, i know this is chatty like IRC
> So now that we agree on those, ho hum.
Please, evil dave, think before you turn into {R}[1]
MBM
[1] Richard Ashton - http://www.fuckwit.tm/
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PR
, more valuable. It's
probably also secret-shared in some form.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:20:52PM +0100, robin szemeti wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2001 13:27, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > You obviously don't actually understand CAs.
> incorrectamundo .. I do .. very well. (my points were more about CA's signing
> personal I
ends the card stripe
> data and the pin number to $villain who makes a fake card and sends minion to
> cash machine to empty the account.
Yeah, well, not much you can do to protect against this type of attack. This
is where smart cards can come in useful, as the bank can send different
challenges that only the smartcard can answer. However, again, this is why
the CCA exists, as a social solution to this problem.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
without the X million
> users M$ can supply
.Net and dot.Gnu are programming language frameworks AIUI, were you thinking
of M$ Passport, the single-sign-on-alike ?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
ns. This will be
dependent on the -q in the invocation of /usr/{lib,sbin}/sendmail.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:14:46PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:06:02PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> > > Incidently, perlfaq9 says that when using sendmail from a
> > > Perl script, you should use the f
erver.
> > Dang. I'll see if I can dig it up elsewhere...
> I have from a reliable source that there might be a T-shirt and the image
> has been shunted elsewhere until decisions have been made.
I can second this. The "reliable source" in question is the girlfriend of
th
one for 114.74.195.in-addr.arpa.
(I'm sorry I'm doing this, I want some ammo that the argument presented in
the email I have just doesn't work, mainly to satisfy myself, as I don't
intend to carry on that flamewar... :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
get back from SAUCE (or rather the 550 lines) give you
quite detailed information about what it didn't like about your
configuration.
In this case, I think you can safely blame mailstart, not SAUCE. I could
quite easily have had eg a quota problem or something similar, which gives
a 450 line.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
fwtw)
depends whether you call it a bug that it can only correctly parse RFC822
addressing.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:12:26AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:01:31AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:51:40AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> > > I've just been tracking down a horrid little what seems to me
qw/valid/;
Is that Abigail's one that uses Parse::RecDescent, because if it is, I think
it should get a prize for the most horrid use of Parse::RecDescent ever.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
e of adventure for me. After all, they've
barely heard of public transport... :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:23:53PM +0100, Marty Pauley wrote:
> On Wed Sep 19 10:34:47 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > Email addresses are divided into a local part and a domain part, separated
> > by an @ sign. The local-part and domain-part are themselves divided into
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:25:56AM -0700, celia romaniuk wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > camden NW*1*
> > kentish town NW*3*
> > note the low numbers they are lower the closer into the centre you get.
> That's not strictly
> true:
art.
> One day I'm going to install a host called 'com' or 'org' and watch the
> fallout.
You'll have to make sure that your mail server qualifies names automatically
(against RFC2821, except in the explicit case of RCPT TO:).
and install subdomains of that host...
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:40:28PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:20:50PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > I disagree, oop north is way beyond kentish town
> > camden NW*1*
> > kentish town NW*3*
> > note the low numbers they are lower
s this posting less of a "bad mood" for people ;-)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
hat's enough to put me back to being grumpy... :-)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
looking at it, people still have the choice to do a local
> download; but if the servers didn't allow that for some messages you
> could expire them at the remote server. Job's a good 'un, as Bez would
> undoubtedly say.
How are you planning to read it if you don
wasn't the case, because that would require parentheses.
Oh well, how well would I have done in the interview? :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
indows?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:35:46AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> My mail got screwed up yesterday - just checking that I have put
> everything back as it should be :)
As london.pm list admin, do you think then, that it might be useful to
have a london.pm.test list ?
MBM
--
Matthe
hat same piece of code
and see if you get a:
Cookie:
header in the request.
MBM (lo-tech solutions to hi-tech problems)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
(doom & gloom merchant since 1977)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
someone with a large interest in security, what all of your points miss
is the idea of giving everyone the minimum information possible. Why give
them an identity card with everything, when you can give them only your
name or your name and address?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:10:52PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Matthew Byng-Maddick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > As someone with a large interest in security, what all of your points miss
> > is the idea of giving everyone the minimum information possible. Why give
>
n++
Debian-- # all the bloody politics
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 11:03:03AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:34:48AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:29:05PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> > > Debian++
> > Debian-- # all the bloody politics
> So ass
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 07:50:11PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> Some of my photos from last night are at the usual place,
> http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/
ScriptAlias? Heard of it?
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
No - no filtering, just a few seconds thought when composing the article.
> Complaining about quoting really is petty and a total waste of time.
So WTF are you doing it?
> If you hate "broken quoting" so much why don't you write a Perl script
> to "fix" it to the way you like and put all your mail through it?
Because then you need to understand language. Well volunteered, since you
think it would be so easy.
> Problem Over.
Not at all.
MBM (angry=630476ms).
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
-audit.html
and CPAN Mail::Audit.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
erate attempt to start a thread that is not
> about quoting. piers described it as atonement ;-)
:-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
h) this looks a lot better, though it's more detailed.
I should have had Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment (W. Richard
Stevens) on my list too. That really is a fantastic book.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
liant. Most people who can't are spammers. (Note
that I said most).
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
s the answer. :-(
When I looked earlier teletext said it was on on bbc2 tonight.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
[various people slagged it off, I'm just going to, for your horror, post
this]
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwypug.pm.org%2F
Nul Points!
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 04:19:56PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:10:32AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwypug.pm.org%2F
> Heh, it's grimmer up Norf
You can't complain, you're west, and s
hdays, and found that it didn't match, and there were
definite peaks in September and March. I suspect, though, that this is not
true as a global thing.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
or, but I would say that. :-)
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
