Vagrant.
Thanks for the reply. In due course, I might get the updated Ubuntu
package. For the moment, I hacked up the scripts in
> /opt/ltsp5/i386/usr/share/ltsp/screen.d/
to get the desired result. At least "telnet" and "startx" suffer from
the same problem. Arguments not passed properly.
Th
On 2015-02-12, Tim Johnston wrote:
ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
...
>>> I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
>>>
>>> >[default]
SERVER=192.168.10.1
SCREEN_01=shell
SCREEN_02=telnet
SCREEN_03=kiosk
>> ...
TELNET_HOS
vagrant
Thanks for the reply.
>>> ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
>>
>> and done the ltsp-build client.
>>
>> I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
>>
>> >[default]
>>>SERVER=192.168.10.1
>>> SCREEN_01=shell
>>> SCREEN_02=telnet
>>> SCREEN_03=kiosk
On 2015-02-12, Tim Johnston wrote:
> On recently upgraded Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty).
>
> I've installed
>
>> ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
>
> and done the ltsp-build client.
>
> I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
>
> >[default]
>> SERVER=192.168.10.1
>>SCREEN_
Hallo Edgar,
Edgar Kogler schrieb am 10.12.2012 23:49:
> I managed to activate ldap-authentication on the terminals from our domain
> controller. I want our users to have access to their local media on the
> terminals. What I found in the docs is that with LTSP5 the user logging in
> on the termi
Loose notes of mine. It's been a while since I set these up. Once done
you forget because it just works. I go to slap for LDAP though, so it
may be a bit different to a Domain Controller.
Make sure
/etc/nsswitch.conf has:
passwd: compat ldap
group: compat ldap
shadow: co
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:57 AM, wrote:
> Sir,
>
> anyone having working Ltsp 5 server on Fedora 12 on single network card.
> If anyone have please guide how to install Ltsp 5 on Fedora 12.
>
> Rajeev.
>
Hello,
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide this is the guide
for LTSP on F
Am 2010-01-28 14:57, schrieb Michael George:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
>> Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
>>> I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
>>> system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 12:19:16, Michael George a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:07:19PM -0500, Eric Thibodeau wrote:
> > > For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what
> > > hardware???s on your thin client. However, it???s possible that you may
> > > want to manually spe
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
> Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
> > I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
> > system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
> > necessary files, but the ter
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:07:19PM -0500, Eric Thibodeau wrote:
> > For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what hardware???s
> > on
> > your thin client. However, it???s possible that you may want to manually
> > specify
> > a kernel module to load after boot.
>
> _after
Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
> I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
> system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
> necessary files, but the terminal hits a kernel panic when it tries to
> mount / over NFS. It says that t
> For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what hardware’s on
> your thin client. However, it’s possible that you may want to manually
> specify
> a kernel module to load after boot.
_after boot_ ...which implies you got past the NFSroot mounting...which he
can't since he
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 18:44:40, Michael George a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:20:38AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
> > I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
> > system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
> > necessary files,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:20:38AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
> I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
> system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
> necessary files, but the terminal hits a kernel panic when it tries to
> mount / over N
Lars Madsen wrote:
> does your USB sticks appear under /media/user ?
Yes
> floppy and Data CDs appear on the desktop and in Places just fine. It is
> only USB sticks that causes problems.
Like I said I have no way to test floppies and CDs so they _might_ work
in KDE also. Maybe someone else ca
Jeff Siddall wrote:
> Lars Madsen wrote:
>>> (2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
>>> floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the "Places" menu, but
>>> USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
>>>
>>> I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter
Lars Madsen wrote:
>> (2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
>> floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the "Places" menu, but
>> USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
>>
>> I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter that will add the icons for
> (2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
> floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the "Places" menu, but
> USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
>
> I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter that will add the icons for USB ad
> CDROM, but i
Lars Madsen wrote:
> Lars Madsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've finally managed to get LTSP 5 working with RHEL 5, by using an
>> Ubuntu based client, and some extensive script modifications.
>>
>> I still have a few problems though, that I hope you could help me fix.
>>
>> (1) the mounted local devices
Lars Madsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've finally managed to get LTSP 5 working with RHEL 5, by using an
> Ubuntu based client, and some extensive script modifications.
>
> I still have a few problems though, that I hope you could help me fix.
>
> (1) the mounted local devices appear twice on the serve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 12/03/2009 14:50, David Hopkins a écrit :
>> I should have begun there: here is my network config
>>
>> - - 2 ethernet devices eth0 an eth1: eth0 is the internet interface,
>> associated to an ADSL connection, and eth1 is plugged to a switch
>> prov
> I should have begun there: here is my network config
>
> - - 2 ethernet devices eth0 an eth1: eth0 is the internet interface,
> associated to an ADSL connection, and eth1 is plugged to a switch
> providing a private network for computers and thin client (which used to
> connect the server with lt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/03/2009 19:41, David Hopkins a écrit :
>> I am wondering if there is not an IP issue because the boot server has
>> default IP 172.31.100.254 and ldm seems to answer on 192.168.1.1 which
>> is the eth1 IP on which my lan is connected.
>
>> In th
> I am wondering if there is not an IP issue because the boot server has
> default IP 172.31.100.254 and ldm seems to answer on 192.168.1.1 which
> is the eth1 IP on which my lan is connected.
> In the instructions on https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
> there are no information o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 10/03/2009 18:44, David Hopkins a écrit :
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
>>> Ma
>>>
>>> I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
>>>
>>> I followed instructions there:
>>>
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
>>>
>>> But failed
>>
>> Make sure you follow them exactly up to the point that you have to
>> enable the network for re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Hopkins a écrit :
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
>>
>> I followed instructions there:
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
>>
>> But failed
>
> Make sure you follow
> Bonjour,
>
> I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
>
> I followed instructions there:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
>
> But failed
Make sure you follow them exactly up to the point that you have to
enable the network for real thin clien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Rob you are right. that depends mainly on the distribution. In lenny you
find it in the [chroot]/etc.
but that was not the question.
The other configurations at my site work fine (using multiple autologins
and so on). Also rebooting the thin cl
I'd just like to point out that LTSP 5 on Debian puts lts.conf in
/opt/ltsp/i386/etc. I think the location is related to whether NFS
or NBD is used for the root image. If NBD is used, then lts.conf must not be
in /opt/ltsp/i386, so it gets put in
/var/lib/tftpboot/i386.
Somebody correct me if
Hi Helmut,
LTSP 5 uses lts.conf in "/var/lib/tftpboot/i386", as stated by Keith. The
file in "/opt/ltsp/i386/etc" is just a dummy file, and there's a lot of
problems you have if you try using it.
PS: Antonio, evite postar em português na lista internacional, nem sempre
você vai ter sorte de encon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Supposing you use a standardinstallation the lts.conf file is in yout
chroot (as you mentionend /opt/ltsp/i386/etc).
reagrads
Helmut
- --
-
Helmut Dier, SysAdmin at ]a[, Vienna
email: he...@gmx.at
- --
It is found in:
/var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Prado"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:48 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp 5 - lts.conf
> Em qual diretório deve ser definido o lts.conf ? Ao que li não deve mais
> ser definido em /opt/ltsp/
At least switching to nfs booted for me except that i am having issues
with gdm not starting properly.
SB
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> Hi Vagrant
>
> Please help me with this. I am trying out a normal debian Ltsp-5.
>
> Loading, please wait...
>
>> IP-Config: eth0 hardware address xx:xx:xx:x
On Thursday 25 December 2008 02:09:02 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
> > currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPWithoutN
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:59:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
> currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
you should just ensure that boot=nfs is in
/var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/pxelinux.cfg/de
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 09:29:11 Nataraj S Narayan, vous avez écrit :
> It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
> currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPWithoutNFS
look for "Reverting t
Hi
It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
Nataraj S Narayan
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:42:43AM -0800, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
>>
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:42:43AM -0800, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> Please help me with this. I am trying out a normal debian Ltsp-5.
..snip...
> > rootserver: 192.168.0.254 rootpath: /opt/ltsp/i386
> > filename : /ltsp/i386/nbi.img
> > Error: Connect: Connection refused
> > mou
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> If the cost of license is a problem, you could also try the 2X product.
>
> There is a free (as in beer) edition of 2X which allow 5 simultaneous
> connection. See http://2x.com/
>
> There is also the free (as in speech: GPL) 2X ThinClientServer PXE
Linux termial server client for windows caveat emptor
http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxts/
--
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 12:41:11 Nataraj S Narayan, vous avez écrit :
> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
> person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
> to help h
For some reason this does not sound like LTSP. Might be just me.?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:13:42PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> > This is some where in the middle of my Ltsp server on XP experiment.
>
> that doesn't sound very fu
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:13:42PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> This is some where in the middle of my Ltsp server on XP experiment.
that doesn't sound very fun... :)
> I finally managed to get vmlinuz -2.6.26-1-486,
> initrd.img-2.6.26-1-486 and a i386.img (file system). For this I used
>
On Thursday 18 December 2008 23:20:51 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
> and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
> pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine? I read
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Scott Balneaves wrote:
> Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have to buy the
> "client" side of the license, he'll still be liable for the "server" side
> of the license which, last time I checked (4+ years ago) was the expensive
> bit.
>
> Could someo
Scott Balneaves skrev:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
>> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
>
> Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he w
Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
>> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
>
> Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he w
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> Hi
>
> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have to buy the
"client" si
I believe the answer to your woes lies here:
http://www.thinstation.net/
Keep it simple dude. ;-) Hope I haven't over-simplified your need.
SB
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nev
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
> Ubuntu 7.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 7.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
> (Fedora 10 Thin Client
>
> http://www.arkki.info/howto/Fedora10/KVM_Virtualbox_01.png
Krhm...
Ubuntu 8.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 8.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
Fedora 10 Thin Client
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) kirjoitti:
> I guess running an LTSP server inside a virtual machine inside of
> Windows would probably be a bit better.
Something like this ;-)
Ubuntu 7.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 7.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
(Fedora 10 Thin Client
http://www.arkki.info/
Chris Roberts wrote:
> I would say so, but it makes my head hurt - it's probably the most convuluted
> method of connecting to a Windows machine imaginable, and does nothing to
> avoid the licensing costs.
I guess running an LTSP server inside a virtual machine inside of
Windows would probably b
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
> person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
> to help him.
Licence restricti
Maybe these links will be of interest:
http://www.ncomputing.com/
http://www.xpunlimited.com/
Sounds like what you really want to do is run a regular LTSP server and
RDP to a Windows Terminal Server and/or Windows XP machine.
I suggest you use LTSP 5, and forget about putting tftp, etc on the
Win
Well, I think the guy needs RDP as just one of the Apps, while he can
use all other Linux apps.
Come on, at least we give credit for an M$ guy is trying out Linux.
He might switch over fully soon enough.
regards
Nataraj
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
wrote:
> N
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
> to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
> person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
> to help him.
Nonsense. A real friend won't ask you to h
Yes you can have something of this sort. But you have to enable
Terminal server on XP. There was some workaround for that. You can
have DHCP,TFTP running on XP. there is one free utility available for
it. I am forgetting this name as I have done this 3-4 years back. Once
you make your thinc
Hi
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
to help him.
The plan is to boot Linux over network and use RDP client in Linux to
c
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
> I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
> and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
> pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine?
I struggle to understand, perhaps this makes
You might want to take a look there:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPQuickInstall
Marc
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Varun Pabrai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
>
> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>
> I have never done ltsp on Ubuntu.
>
On Thursday 13 November 2008 07:20:41 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
> > I want to setup ltsp-server.
> >
> > apt-get showed me the following packages :
> > ltsp-client
> > ltsp-client - core
> > ltspfs
> > ltspfsd
> > ltsp - manager
> > ltsp - server
> > l
Varun,
See the Ubuntu LTSP documentation -
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP
Cheers,
Jordan/Lns
Varun Pabrai wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
>
> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>
> I have never done ltsp on Ubuntu.
>
> I have never done ltsp-5.
>
> apt-get showed m
Ivan Torretti - Sun Microsystems Schweiz AG kirjoitti:
> yes sure this is the easiest way to install ltsp on a ubuntu... but the
> learn effect is very poor
Ok. You can read these pages about theory first and then install the way
you like most.
http://doc.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/edubuntu/handbook/
Hi Varun
Varun Pabrai wrote:
> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
>
> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>From a command line, do a "sudo apt-get install ltsp-server". If you
want to run a DHCP server from the same machine, do a "sudo apt-get
install ltsp-server-standalone".
If your server IP is not on a
Hi Asmo
yes sure this is the easiest way to install ltsp on a ubuntu... but the
learn effect is very poor
regards
Ivan
Asmo Koskinen wrote:
> Varun Pabrai kirjoitti:
>
>
>> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
>>
>> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>>
> >
>
>> Please explain me the individual
Varun Pabrai kirjoitti:
> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
>
> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>
> Please explain me the individual packages and
> Which of the following packages I need to install.
Please, please - Use Ubuntu 8.04.1 Alternate (i386), it has everything
you need out-of-box.
"The ins
Hi Varun
i have installed Ubuntu 8.04 with LTSP5 for a School Project
i cannot explain all the packages but i can say to you which package i
have used!
ltsp-server-standalone --> this package is the hole ltsp environment
(standalone means that you use the ltsp server as dhcp server too)
ltsp-s
2008/11/12 Varun Pabrai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
> I want to setup ltsp-server.
>
> apt-get showed me the following packages :
> ltsp-client
> ltsp-client - core
> ltspfs
> ltspfsd
> ltsp - manager
> ltsp - server
> ltsp - server - standalone
>
> Please explain me the
hi,
Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Gideon Romm:
> acpid is not installed in a default chroot.
it definately is in ubuntu, not sure what chroot you look at though, but
ltsp-client depends on it since hardy (i'm not sure, but i think it was
like that even in gutsy)
ciao
oli
acpid is not installed in a default chroot.
If you want to force "Instant Off" capabilities, you can either:
1. Go into the thin client BIOS and *disable* ACPI and set the Power
button from "4 secs" to "Instant Off" (on most BIOSes); or
2. install acpid into your chroot and reroll the image
-
Il giorno 01/nov/08, alle ore 12:00, SZABO Zsolt ha scritto:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
>
If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the
client to
poweroff.
Is there any solution to this task?
>>>
>>> The power(off) button on the box of
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
>>> If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the client to
>>> poweroff.
>>>
>>> Is there any solution to this task?
>>
>> The power(off) button on the box of the client? ;-)
>
> Great, but only pushing it doesn't work... it should be th
Il giorno 31/ott/08, alle ore 21:00, SZABO Zsolt ha scritto:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
>
>> I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to
>> poweroff
>> clients when users finish working but with this configuration it
>> seems to be
>> not possible at
On Saturday 01 November 2008 07:55:29 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to
> poweroff clients when users finish working but with this configuration
> it seems to be not possible at all.
> If user logout then client log in again
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
> I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to poweroff
> clients when users finish working but with this configuration it seems to be
> not possible at all.
> If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the client to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timothy Legge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a couple of notes on my recent implementation of Ubuntu with LTSP
> 5. The progress on sound, local devices etc is amazing compared to my
> first FC1 based install. Most things just work in initial testing bu
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timothy Legge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a couple of notes on my recent implementation of Ubuntu with LTSP
> 5. The progress on sound, local devices etc is amazing compared to my
> first FC1 based install. Most things just work in initial testing bu
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Rob Owens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for bringing some sanity to this discussion. That's all the
> original poster was looking for -- a way to share his learning
> experience with others.
Exactly. My original post listed a couple of the issues I ran int
On Friday 17 October 2008 21:10:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > No it simply means YOU don't know how to do it. Making LTSP more
> > complicated to solve THAT problem is silly.
> > My previous mail shows 2 ways to achieve bog-standard-ltsp AND
> > administrator access without passwd access from th
Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0600, David Burgess wrote:
>
>> I'm not criticising the ltsp team. I love what they provide. And I'm
>> not asking anybody--I hope--to change the way your ssh server or ltsp
>> server operates. I simply think it would be a boon to the pr
Jordan Erickson wrote:
> (I apologize in advance for my harsh tone, I truly mean no offense. I'm
> just, for whatever reason, pretty hell-bent as Rob says, about this. ;) )
>
> David Burgess wrote:
>> Sure, but this setup doesn't prevent h4xorz in the far east from
>> breaking into my server on 1
Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Donnerstag, den 16.10.2008, 14:24 -0400 schrieb Rob Owens:
>> I think the main issue here is that LTSP 5 requires the use of ssh, and
>> it requires some relatively relaxed security settings -- in particular,
>> it requires that you allow password authentication.
>
jam wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server
> by default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a
> lot more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
>
jam wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2008 05:01:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> As I've pointed out, ltsp is an alternate use of ssh, and as Rob
>> pointed out, ltsp requires that ssh be configured in a way that is
>> simply unacceptable for traditional use, i.e., remote (open) access.
> [s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:58 PM, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it simply means YOU don't know how to do it. Making LTSP more complicated
> to solve THAT problem is silly.
> My previous mail shows 2 ways to achieve bog-standard-ltsp AND administrator
> access without passwd access from the in
On Friday 17 October 2008 05:01:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
> As I've pointed out, ltsp is an alternate use of ssh, and as Rob
> pointed out, ltsp requires that ssh be configured in a way that is
> simply unacceptable for traditional use, i.e., remote (open) access.
[snip]
No it simply mea
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
>
> Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
> is less likely to work where there is a determined attack.
>
> > My server is on a 192.168.
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server
> > > > by default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a
> > > > lot more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
> > > > ad
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 16.10.2008, 14:24 -0400 schrieb Rob Owens:
> I think the main issue here is that LTSP 5 requires the use of ssh, and
> it requires some relatively relaxed security settings -- in particular,
> it requires that you allow password authentication.
thats a mis-assumption, there a
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Rob Owens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should note that now is a good time to harden /etc/ssh/sshd_config
> -- otherwise there was no point in this whole excercise. For instance:
>
> PermitRootLogin no
> PasswordAuthentication no
> AllowUsers myadminuser mybac
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Jordan Erickson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I apologize in advance for my harsh tone, I truly mean no offense. I'm
> just, for whatever reason, pretty hell-bent as Rob says, about this. ;) )
Your tone doesn't bother me. I think it's been a good discussion.
> **L
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0600, David Burgess wrote:
> I'm not criticising the ltsp team. I love what they provide. And I'm
> not asking anybody--I hope--to change the way your ssh server or ltsp
> server operates. I simply think it would be a boon to the project to
> remove some of the
(I apologize in advance for my harsh tone, I truly mean no offense. I'm
just, for whatever reason, pretty hell-bent as Rob says, about this. ;) )
David Burgess wrote:
>> No offense, but this is what learning how openssh-server works is all
>> about.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that.
> No offense, but this is what learning how openssh-server works is all
> about.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Certainly not everyone enjoys
seeing how every config file works. Some admins and I'd say the vast
majority of users just want things to work. To repeat an analogy I
heard recently,
Rob Owens wrote:
> I think the main issue here is that LTSP 5 requires the use of ssh, and
> it requires some relatively relaxed security settings -- in particular,
> it requires that you allow password authentication.
>
> Jordan, I don't understand why you're so hell-bent on preventing an easy
> f
I think the main issue here is that LTSP 5 requires the use of ssh, and
it requires some relatively relaxed security settings -- in particular,
it requires that you allow password authentication.
Jordan, I don't understand why you're so hell-bent on preventing an easy
fix for this. That's all the
David Burgess wrote:
>> Seriously, this conversation is getting kind of silly. I seriously see
>> no need to launch a completely separate sshd just for administrators on
>> a different port. There are plenty of network-layer utils available to
>> secure a port from the outside world. There is no ne
Ooops, youre right, nice catch...
David Van Assche
www.nubae.com
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Kenneth Tanzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glad to hear it. The documentation, however, seems to be written the
> other way:
>
>> The solution is to create 2 instances ssh, one serving the internal
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
