I've been experiencing several exceptions on OSX, using commit 96f64ac0.
Sofar I've tracked down one of them:
A (basic_string) exception occurs when saving a document with a
sufficient long filename (more than about 18 characters without the
extension). Take any .lyx file and add characters to
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:03:27PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> > I did not test (I assume I get the same result as Kornel since I have a
> > similar system), but I suppose the next step is to send the .tex files.
> > e.g. instead of exporting to PDF (pdflatex) export to LaTeX (pdflatex).
I do i
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:21:11AM +0200, "Mag. Georg Kö" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> let me start let me start by saying kudos to all of you! I is really
> fantastic what Lyx provides especially as an application for scholars around
> the world. As I quit doing development several years ago I won’t
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 02:43:39PM -0400, Ian Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is in response to a post by Scott Kosty on latex-community.org.
>
> I'd be interested in testing out an OS X build of LyX 2.2 when it's reached
> the appropriate development stage. Drop me a line with more info when the
>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:27:29PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:18:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> >> I realised that this not only applies to compilation with Xe/LuaTeX which
> >> is a good thing -- it also catches cases l
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:30:07PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/10/2015 19:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Well we can adjust the timeframe if necessary (it is already delayed
> >because of Qt 5.6 beta delay). If this is important or there is
> >precedence then we can delay a couple
On 10/20/2015 04:07 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
...I mainly use git for LyX development like "svn + stash", and keep
two separate working trees for branch and master.
I do the same, just because compiling is faster this way (and disk space
is cheap).
Many git features are confusing for me as well
Dear all,
let me start let me start by saying kudos to all of you! I is really fantastic
what Lyx provides especially as an application for scholars around the world.
As I quit doing development several years ago I won’t be any help in this
regard. Would be more than willing though to contribu
Scott Kostyshak lyx.org> writes:
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:15:13PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > I tried your example, all available pdf formats are displaying the
change here.
> > (E.g.
> > PDF (ps2pdf), PDF (pdflatex), PDF (dvipdfm), PDF (XeTeX), PDF (LuaTeX)
> > )
> >
> > Ex
Am 20.10.2015 um 04:39 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I CC'ed you on the following emails (it hides that I CC'ed you but if
you search for the message in your email client it should show it):
Hm, now I see them. There were automatically moved into the spam folder
where also all the commit report ma
Op 15 okt. 2015 08:37 schreef "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" :
>
> Le 15/10/15 01:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
>> LyX 2.2.0 and the following 2.2.x releases will still continue to work
>> well with Qt 4.8.6 but will also support Qt 5.6, which brings some
>> advantages most notably for users with HiDPI d
Op 20 okt. 2015 20:35 schreef "Georg Baum" :
>
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > Besides this I am still using MSVC 2010. I need to update to MSVC 2012
> > or newer and this is another challenge. I already tested MSVC 2012 with
> > Qt 5.5 with success. Let's see what Qt 5.6 supports and if I can then
> > st
Op 20 okt. 2015 02:32 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" :
>
> Am 15.10.2015 um 01:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> Uwe can you confirm that shipping our alpha with Qt 5.6 beta is
>> feasible for you?
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> I am open for anything. I think that i will need in any case some help
from Vincent - in the
Am 19.10.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Welcome back!
Thanks JMarc for the info.
PS: and of course my idea of replacing ugly tables with nice formal
tables and remove all the spacing hacks you had to do is still waiting
for your answer ;)
What do you mean? Apparently I missed
On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
>> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
>> Author: Günter Milde
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>> F
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> ( I see now in mail-archive.com this thread. It would have been nice to
> send me at least a direct mail to assure that I am informed. In the past
> I could read the list via NNTP but my ISP dropped that feature. When I
> am abroad I don't read mail-archive.com .)
Do you mean t
Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 um 20:18:33, schrieb Georg Baum
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> > On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> >> I don't understand what I made wrong. I only changed something in a
> >> module and added a fileformat change for lyx2lyx. I did not change any
> >> tex2lxy test f
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:50:54AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Scott asked not long ago what could be done to make it easier for
>> newcomers. It is now clear to me that having a clearer bug tracker
>> is an aspect that can be improved
Op 20-10-2015 om 20:06 schreef Georg Baum:
Guillaume Munch wrote:
I'll let Vincent decide whether he wants to make this change.
Sure, our messages crossed each other, I would not have suggested that if I
knew that he had time to test.
The compilation error could btw easily be fixed by moving
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> After rereading the below email I just realized I often use the term
> "we" and "us". Sorry about that. I do not mean to pretend like I am
> speaking on behalf of everyone (I do not forget that I am a relative
> newcommer here!). Instead of taking the time to correct all t
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:50:54AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Scott asked not long ago what could be done to make it easier for
> newcomers. It is now clear to me that having a clearer bug tracker
> is an aspect that can be improved. In addition, the initial question
> was to know what to do w
Hi,
This is in response to a post by Scott Kosty on latex-community.org.
I'd be interested in testing out an OS X build of LyX 2.2 when it's reached
the appropriate development stage. Drop me a line with more info when the
time comes.
Thanks,
Ian
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Besides this I am still using MSVC 2010. I need to update to MSVC 2012
> or newer and this is another challenge. I already tested MSVC 2012 with
> Qt 5.5 with success. Let's see what Qt 5.6 supports and if I can then
> still compile LyX 2.1.x with Qt 4.x and MSVC 2010 on the sam
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:16:44PM +0200, Günter Milde wrote:
> commit 1523fc6023440f10ca0d82a681ded5c060d8fd33
> Author: Günter Milde
> Date: Tue Oct 20 19:14:39 2015 +0200
>
> Partial fix for #9740 "XeTeX/LuaTeX with TeX fonts problems".
>
> Fixes output for 3 of the 4 test lyx-f
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> I don't understand what I made wrong. I only changed something in a
>> module and added a fileformat change for lyx2lyx. I did not change any
>> tex2lxy test file nor did I change tex2lyx code.
It is all documented in Development.lyx.
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> I'll let Vincent decide whether he wants to make this change.
Sure, our messages crossed each other, I would not have suggested that if I
knew that he had time to test.
The compilation error could btw easily be fixed by moving the implementation
of the methods in a .cp
Guenter Milde wrote:
> I updated the lyxformat number in the src/tex2lyx/test/*.lyx.lyx files and
> now all tex2lyx tests pass here.
Very good.
Just to avoid future errors: I assume that you did check before that a
simple update of the format number is OK, and that no tex2lyx source code
chang
Op 19-10-2015 om 23:36 schreef Guillaume Munch:
Le 19/10/2015 21:59, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
Op 19 okt. 2015 22:51 schreef "Guillaume Munch" mailto:g...@lyx.org>>:
>
> Le 19/10/2015 21:34, Georg Baum a écrit :
>>
>>
>> The message on the list is related to commit e948caf6, which i
On 2015-10-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:18:30PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> I realised that this not only applies to compilation with Xe/LuaTeX which
>> is a good thing -- it also catches cases like small letters missing in
>> most math-script fonts (To fix the descri
Le 09/10/2015 22:07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 09/10/2015 22:06, Georg Baum a écrit :
Even more interesting. I always thought that LyX uses the "use tabs for
logical indentation, and spaces for visual alignment" model for C++ code.
This way, it does not matter at all whether you display
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:49:40PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak lyx.org> writes:
>
>
> >
> > Hi Paul, can you send a minimal example to the list so we can see if we
> > see the changes in other formats? So to confirm, if you compile with
> > XeTeX or LuaTeX you do not see the c
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:15:13PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 um 14:27:54, schrieb Paul A. Rubin
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I couldn't find an open bug report on either of these, so I thought I'd
> > ask for input here. The following apply to LyX 2.1.4.
> >
> > Issue #1:
Am Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 um 14:27:54, schrieb Paul A. Rubin
> Hi all,
>
> I couldn't find an open bug report on either of these, so I thought I'd
> ask for input here. The following apply to LyX 2.1.4.
>
> Issue #1: In the User Guide, section 6.16, the last paragraph says that
> dvipost mus
Scott Kostyshak lyx.org> writes:
>
> Hi Paul, can you send a minimal example to the list so we can see if we
> see the changes in other formats? So to confirm, if you compile with
> XeTeX or LuaTeX you do not see the changes?
Scott,
I'm not set up to use LuaTeX (and don't know how to use XeTe
On 2015-10-19, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:38:12PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Le 19/10/2015 19:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> >Many tex2lyx tests have started to fail (before it was just 4 and we
>> >knew why and I think Günter's recent commit might have fixed them?
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:59:59PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:24:45PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9633
> >
> > I am a bit confused. I thought my fix which I just submitted would address
> > this?
>
On 2015-10-19, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>> There is some at lib/doc/Development.lyx
>>> I see lots of diffs of the form
>>> #LyX file created by tex2lyx 2.2
>>> -\lyxformat 497
>>> +\lyxformat 498
>>> and the commit ce933b1e14 has incremented the format
Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 um 01:04:36, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 19.10.2015 um 20:55 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > There is some at lib/doc/Development.lyx
> >> I see lots of diffs of the form
> >>
> >> #LyX file created by tex2lyx 2.2
> >> -\lyxformat 497
> >> +\lyxformat 498
> >> and the co
Le 20/10/2015 04:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Many developers pop in and out. I think JMarc is the only developer who
is consistent. It is a wonder how he has not gone insane yet (or maybe
he is pushing his commits from the inside of an insane asylum?).
Am I supposed to resent this? (don't wor
39 matches
Mail list logo