Hi,
I use Apache-1.3.22 + modperl-1.26 and Apache::ASP 2.29. I experience
problems with Apache::ASP $Response->Flush() method, which is supposed to
push already printed data to the client. Although this Flush() method calls
print() method from modperl's Apache request object, the
Philip Mak wrote:
> I took a look at the winning design at
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/ and I see a significant problem for
> people in 800x600 resolution (which is pretty common still, and I use it):
Philip, can you please repost your comments to docs-dev
perl.apache.org?
Hi there,
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
> I took a look at the winning design
You just spammed the Net with 100 Megabytes of junk.
Please don't send 60k messages to the mod_perl list.
73,
Ged.
I took a look at the winning design at
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/ and I see a significant problem for
people in 800x600 resolution (which is pretty common still, and I use it):
A horizontal scrollbar appears at the bottom of the screen.
Can't this be fixed? Also, the left si
>
> All that makes it really easy for someone new to feel comfortable.
And isn't that what the mod_perl site should do?
>
> It would be nice to see license info, too, as someone new
> might want to be
> clear on that right away, too.
>
> You can also quickly see a list of supported module
I'm throwing in my two cents a bit late, so it's a bit depreciated now (one
cent?). But something to think about for the site.
I've worked with php a little lately -- not programming, but making minor
changes to a site. I've used the php site http://www.php.net/ a few times,
and I've found it
>>Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
>>the best of each other's work and produce the "perfect" design, that
>>
> That would be OK for me, Carlos, Allan??
Wow, all three winners have agreed to work together to make the killer
design! that's great guys!!! I guess the next step is to
Hi ALL,
I did love the result and I too go by,..
>> Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
>>the best of each other's work and produce
>>the "perfect"design,
I am willing to help you guys,.
Congrats "Thomas and other participents".
With best regards,
Anand R
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Q
Thomas Klausner wrote:
>># Design by Votes
>>--
>>1. Thomas Klausner 86
>>
> yeah!
Congrats Thomas! (and Allan).
>> Ideally if Thomas, Carlos and Allan could take
>>the best of each other's work and produce the "perfect" design, that
>>
> That would be OK for me, C
hello all
a few comments from me regarding the competion.
first of all a big thank to stas for invoking it.
it was quite fun and challenging but also hard
work getting the job done (learning TT + doc-set).
secondly. thomas (and carlos), congratulations! i liked
both your solutions.
also tha
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:28:04PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> # Design by Votes
> --
> 1. Thomas Klausner 86
yeah!
> Since Thomas' design has won the gold, I suggest that we incorporate the
> constructive comments (attached) into his design, with David Harris'
> su
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Alastair Stuart wrote:
> question one
>
> There is a need to add new client profiles to the centralised
> database, which create new application filesystems, new database
> structures and CGI trees. Thus a new profile can be created
> and activated with the push of a few but
> as it stands,
> the cgi structure looks like this
>
> https://www.foo.co.za/cgi-bin/client1/index.pl
> https://www.foo.co.za/cgi-bin/client2/index.pl
>
> it would be better if it was
>
> https://www.foo.co.za/client1
> https://www.foo.co.za/client2
You can just use this in your httpd.conf:
Dir
- Original Message -
From: "Alastair Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:38 PM
Subject: modperl questions
[snip]
> -- how to add new aliases to httpd.conf or ./conf/clients.pl
> without having to restart a
> That's said I suggest that any further discussion on this topic is to be
> made on the modperl-site list, so not to clutter the modperl users list
> with unnecessary noise. I've originaly posted here, because I wanted to
> reach as many caring users as possible. But n
hello world,
I have been eavesdropping on this list for a while and have
enjoyed the general discussion.
I have been working on a perl based application for about a
year now, and am longing to migrate to mod_perl. I build
a few simple commercial sites with mod perl previously
and loved it. My c
(not talking) contributions
to improve the chosen design will help a lot.
That's said I suggest that any further discussion on this topic is to be
made on the modperl-site list, so not to clutter the modperl users list
with unnecessary noise. I've originaly posted here, because I wanted t
[Crossposting modperl list, since Jeff Yoak sent his question to both
lists, and I'd rather answer once :)]
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Yoak) writes:
>
> [C vs mod_perl for web applications]
>
>>with something I've done, and a client
This is just a reminder that we need your votes. So far we have about
130 votes. Please help us to choose.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
> challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
>
> Now it'
>
> Advance ordered via Amazon.com! Actually I did it awhile ago when I
> first found out that there was a new mod_perl.
cool.
BTW, if you do pre-order, following the amazon link from our homepage
results in a little extra for us authors (which helps pay for things
like domain registration fe
At 10:56 AM -0500 12/6/01, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>> SAMS will publish the new mod_perl Developer's Cookbook by Geoffrey
>> Young, Paul Lindner and Randy Kobes in January, 2002. You can find more
>> info at http://www.modperlcookbook.org/.
>>
>> Great work guys!
>
>thanks for
Hi
I haven't used the -P switch too much, but it occurred to me that it
might be helpful to use a preprocessor to handle some things [if (
$DEBUG ) {}] instead of relying on run-time logic.
Can anyone say anthing meaningful about the interaction of this switch
and mod_perl handlers? Is there som
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> SAMS will publish the new mod_perl Developer's Cookbook by Geoffrey
> Young, Paul Lindner and Randy Kobes in January, 2002. You can find more
> info at http://www.modperlcookbook.org/.
>
> Great work guys!
thanks for the mention Stas - a bit ahead of schedule but apprecia
SAMS will publish the new mod_perl Developer's Cookbook by Geoffrey
Young, Paul Lindner and Randy Kobes in January, 2002. You can find more
info at http://www.modperlcookbook.org/.
Great work guys!
There are two more modperl books in the pip
Thanks, Eric. Seems to be working.
Emad
Eric Cholet wrote:
>
> --On mardi 4 décembre 2001 08:17 -0800 Emad Fanous
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address > ip listed here>"
> >
> > So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
>
--On mardi 4 décembre 2001 08:17 -0800 Emad Fanous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address ip listed here>"
>
> So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
> have unique email addresses. :-(
>
> Emad
Sorry about that, this constraint
"Sorry, someone (you?) has already voted from IP address "
So much for allowing my co-workers to vote even though we
have unique email addresses. :-(
Emad
> Original Message
> Subject: [modperl site design challenge] please vote
> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 16
John Saylor wrote:
> Hi
>
> ( 01.12.04 16:39 +0800 ) Stas Bekman:
>
>>Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
>>challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
>>
>
> I'd like to echo that thanks si
l and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
> > > challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
> > >
> > > Now it's a time for you to chose the design that you like the most by
> > > voting at http://www.tohubohu.net/cgi/mpchallenge
> > >
>
Hi
( 01.12.04 16:39 +0800 ) Stas Bekman:
> Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
> challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
I'd like to echo that thanks since all 3 designs are thoughtful and well
executed.
While a poll is c
You just click on the names ... Didn't you see the links?
Einar
At 09:52 04/12/2001 -0300, you wrote:
>El Mar 04 Dic 2001 05:39, Stas Bekman escribió:
> > Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
> > challenge and submitted their modperl site desi
Hans Poo wrote:
[snip]
>> voting at http://www.tohubohu.net/cgi/mpchallenge
[snip]
> Please, can you send the address of the three designs?
did you try clicking the links with the names?
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
http://www.quantumfx.com/modperl_site/
http://www.apache.
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 13:52, Hans Poo wrote:
> Please, can you send the address of the three designs?
If you click the names on the poll, you go to the sites.
--
___
Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p
El Mar 04 Dic 2001 05:39, Stas Bekman escribió:
> Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
> challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
>
> Now it's a time for you to chose the design that you like the most by
> voting at htt
:: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT Server:
:: Apache/1.3.23-dev (Unix) PHP/4.0.6 mod_perl/1.26_01-dev
:: Connection: close Content-Type:
:: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Expires: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT
::
:: Double header issue?
Worked fine for me.
Jonathan M. Holl
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks to Eric Cholet for providing this voting script and hosting it.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 09:39:28 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.23-dev (Unix)
PHP/4.0.6 mod_perl/1.26_01-dev Connection: close Content-Type:
text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Expi
Thomas Klausner, Allan Juul and Carlos Ramirez have answered the
challenge and submitted their modperl site designs. Thank you folks!
Now it's a time for you to chose the design that you like the most by
voting at http://www.tohubohu.net/cgi/mpchallenge
In order to let everybody enough
The deadline is over now, but if you didn't have enough time till now
and want to submit your design or improve the one that you've submitted,
please email me and we will wait for you. If you do that, please give me
a completion time estimate. The deadline was set in order to make things
happe
on 26.11.01 17:14, John Saylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> ( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
>> You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
>> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
>
Nice work!
Is it all right to talk details?
On Monday 26 November 2001 10:07, Bill Moseley wrote:
---snip---
> Does it need to render well in old browsers? (e.g. netscape 4.08)
>
> There's a lot of old browsers out there, but maybe anyone looking at
> mod_perl would be a bit more up to date...
>
>
>
> Bill Moseley
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 11:14 AM 11/26/01 -0500, John Saylor wrote:
>> * While the design might not be to cool from the designers point of view, I
>> like it because it is simple, doesn't use HTML-tables, is small and fast
>> (/very/ little HTML-overhead) and accessible to disabled people.
>
>But that *is* cool. I thi
Hi
( 01.11.25 22:37 +0100 ) Thomas Klausner:
> You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
I like it. The main part of it is now just an elaboration of the
contents, I imagine this will be a changing teaser of some sort.
>
27;t ?) ?
> On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM generates HTML like this:
>
> text
>
>
> This isn't valid HTML (according to W3C), so those pages won't validate
> successfully.
> e.g:
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/download/binaries.html
me of the deeper pages, Pod::POM generates HTML like this:
text
This isn't valid HTML (according to W3C), so those pages won't validate
successfully.
e.g:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/download/binaries.html
Another problem Stas pointed out is with pages containing
On Sunday 25 November 2001 22:37, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
Simple, nice, and cool (imho), thanks for submitting !
> * The first page ("Home") successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
That's very good. Do the others validate as
Hi!
You can look at my idea of the the new modperl-site design here:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/
You can get the whole distro to download at:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/modperl-site-domm.src.tgz
or just the output at:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/modperl-site
George Francis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a mod_cgi application, which we are currently in the process of
> converting into a mod_perl application. the necessary configuration changes
> related to mod_perl have been made. however we are facing a no. of problems.
> some of the typical problems ar
Hello,
I have a mod_cgi application, which we are currently in the process of
converting into a mod_perl application. the necessary configuration changes
related to mod_perl have been made. however we are facing a no. of problems.
some of the typical problems are:
1) We are a group of three deve
: pascal barbedor ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 10:39
AM
Subject: Re: modperl 1.31 PDF pb
- Original Message -
From:
pascal barbedor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:49
AM
Subject: modperl 1.31 PDF
pascal barbedor wrote:
> I have problem trying to download the pdf version of the guide.
>
> several downloads always results in incorrect zip impossible to decompress.
As suggested by others this is a winXX ie/ns prob. it's covered here:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/#download
--
_
- Original Message -
From:
pascal barbedor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:49
AM
Subject: modperl 1.31 PDF pb
Hi
I have problem trying to download the pdf version
of the guide.
several downloads always results in incorrect
Hi
I have problem trying to download the pdf version
of the guide.
several downloads always results in incorrect zip
impossible to decompress.
i already noticed this problem with former version
of the guide.
has anyone succesfully downloaded and uncompressed
the pdf file ?*
I am on
Brad Dameron wrote:
> I installed mod perl and php 4 into along with apache 1.3.22. When I add the
> following:
>
>
>
> AddHandler perl-script .cgi
> PerlHandler HTML::Mason
>
>
> require "/var/conf/apache/handler.pl";
>
>
>
> and then try to start apache I get this error:
>
> Syntax
tried that again
using:
perl Makefile.PL USE_APXS=1 WITH_APXS=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
EVERYTHING=1
(may be wrapped)
As far as I know this is the correct way to install it as a DSO, but
nevertheless after installing it, Apache::AuthenSMB didn't work any
more.
Although mod_info says modperl is
Tom Servo wrote:
>
> I was told over the weekend by one of my old eToys cow-orkers that the
> current incarnation of www.etoys.com isn't running our old code. Leave
> it to KB to buy all the code then not bother to use it.
>
> I understand that's also the reason they couldn't be bothered to mi
> Perrin or others involved in the old eToys (or anyone in the new
Toys) --
> does anyone know if this is the same mod_perl technology you guys wrote?
I'm not involved in that anymore, so I don't have first-hand information.
However, a brief look at the site makes me think they are not using any
At 12:26 PM 10/25/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>I saw an article in today's ComputerWorld that indicates the technology et
>al for eToys was bought by another toy firm (KB) and they plan to put it
>up to sell toys for this holiday season again.
>
>http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0
I was told over the weekend by one of my old eToys cow-orkers that the
current incarnation of www.etoys.com isn't running our old code. Leave
it to KB to buy all the code then not bother to use it.
I understand that's also the reason they couldn't be bothered to migrate
the old accounts over.
I saw an article in today's ComputerWorld that indicates the technology et
al for eToys was bought by another toy firm (KB) and they plan to put it up
to sell toys for this holiday season again.
http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO65008,00.html
Perrin or others involved in t
Joshua Chamas wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>dev@@perl.apache.org - 2.5, but their search engines suck
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1
>>
>>
>
> Hey Stas,
>
> I have the asp list getting archived at:
>
> h
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> dev@@perl.apache.org - 2.5, but their search engines suck
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1
>
Hey Stas,
I have the asp list getting archived at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/asp%40perl.a
> Is there a reason NOT to put the
> images in a database?
There are many.
1) You can't manipulate them with file-based tools any more.
2) Handling a request for an image consumes many more resources, since there
is now application code and a database involved rather than just a simple
static fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I just caught the end of the discussion about Stonhenge::Pictures and
> Apache::Gallery ...
> I have been working on setting up a photography site for myself and a
> few other digital photographers. Is there a reason
Bill Moseley wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> I just updated the search site for Apache.org with a newer version of
> swish. The context highlighting is a bit silly, but that can be fixed.
> I'm only caching the first 15K of text from each page for context
> highlighting.
>
> http://search.apache.org
>
I just caught the end of the discussion about Stonhenge::Pictures and
Apache::Gallery ...
I have been working on setting up a photography site for myself and a
few other digital photographers. Is there a reason NOT to put the
images in a database? It certainly seemed to speed up pattern searc
Hi folks,
We need your help. There are dozens of [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
archives, but just a few or none at all of the other modperl lists. Some
archives are browsable, but their search engines simply suck. e.g.
marc.theaimsgroup.com I think is the only one that archives
[EMAIL
efreshed once a
> day.
>
> The site actually runs ModPerl with Matt Sergeant's LibXML and LibXSLT
> modules.
That's cool, but I've asked for the links with modperl-foo lists
archives that I've listed in my orig
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>I've just updated the archives list at
>>http://perl.apache.org/#maillists, so here is what we have:
>>
>>dev@@perl.apache.org - 2.5, but their search engines suck
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED
n/read/category/Programming_Languages
http://news.search.nl/style/search.en/read/category/Programming_Languages/Pe
rl/list/page1.html
Currently refreshed 4 times a day, with searching being refreshed once a day.
The site actually runs ModPerl with Matt Sergeant's LibXML and LibXSLT modules.
>
> I've just updated the archives list at
> http://perl.apache.org/#maillists, so here is what we have:
>
> dev@@perl.apache.org - 2.5, but their search engines suck
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - none
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1
as far as
Hi Stas,
I just updated the search site for Apache.org with a newer version of
swish. The context highlighting is a bit silly, but that can be fixed.
I'm only caching the first 15K of text from each page for context
highlighting.
http://search.apache.org
It seems reasonably fast (it's not runn
Randy Rasmussen wrote:
> When I compile mod_perl-1.26 with apache_1.3.20 I get a core dump
> when I try and start apache. I have the core file if needed. I have
> included the revision and makefile information plus the output of
> truss -ef ./apachectl start.
Randy, please see the SUPPORT file
When I compile mod_perl-1.26 with apache_1.3.20 I get a core dump
when I try and start apache. I have the core file if needed. I have
included the revision and makefile information plus the output of
truss -ef ./apachectl start.
Randy
#
perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 5 subversion 2
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Roger Espel Llima wrote:
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also check the archives for 'lingerd' keyword. Here is what I've but it
> > didn't enter the guide yet, since it's waiting to be reviewed by Roger
> > Espel Llima, the author of lingerd. ...and waiting, and
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also check the archives for 'lingerd' keyword. Here is what I've but it
> didn't enter the guide yet, since it's waiting to be reviewed by Roger
> Espel Llima, the author of lingerd. ...and waiting, and waiting, and
> waiting :(
sorry, I've had a bunch of
om it to post. Please don't link to the list directly so we won't get
spammed. Thanks.
The new repository is called modperl-docs, but it'll be automatically
placed into modperl-2.0/docs when you check out mod_perl. So you can get
the rep in one of these ways:
% cvs -d :pserver:[EM
Hi everyone,
I'm a bit of a novice here and I'm having a strange problem. I'm using
apache 1.3.20 with modperl 1.26 and embperl 1.3.3 and postgres 7.02. Every
once in a while I get:
Internal Server Error
[11274]ERR: 32: Line 165: Warning in Perl code: DBD::Pg::db selectrow_a
people use 5.8.0 since there's been a lot of fixes going into the
> ithreads code since 5.6.1.
modperl-2.0 only requires ithreads if you want to use a threaded mpm.
using prefork mpm (1.3 process model) does not require ithreads.
Hi list:
I try to staticallly compile modperl-1.26 into apache-1.3.20 but
I get the following compile error when I compile apache-1.3.20:
modules/perl/libperl.a(mod_perl_opmask.o): In function
`mod_perl_set_opmask':
mod_perl_opmask.o(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to `Perl_
Are there any suggestions in building mod_perl for NETWARE using codewarrior ?
All you webmasters out there - Gunnar Hjalmarsson has upgraded his
(full-featured yet free opensource) webring maintenance package Ringlink to
run under mod_perl (via Apache::Registry), and I can report it runs well on
Win32.
You can get it at http://www.ringlink.org/
regards, Rod
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Castellon, Francisco wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> What i am running : Win98, Apache 1.3.20, mod_perl 1.25, Apache::ASP 2.17,
> ActivePerl 5.0.1 (build 626).
>
> I want to upgrade to mod_perl 1.26 from version 1.25. What do i have to do?
> But also i have installed a few other apach
Hi folks:
What i am running : Win98, Apache 1.3.20, mod_perl 1.25, Apache::ASP 2.17,
ActivePerl 5.0.1 (build 626).
I want to upgrade to mod_perl 1.26 from version 1.25. What do i have to do?
But also i have installed a few other apache packages that rely on mod_perl
to work, like apache::asp. Wo
shows a connection reset instead of a success
> message, the same goes for lynx (Alert!: Unexpected network read error;
> connection aborted.). The ScriptAlias version works fine. The two
> scripts can be seen online at
>
> Regular CGI version : http://www.nons
Philip Mak wrote:
> I tried telneting to your web server to see what's going on. Look at this:
>
> $ telnet www.nonserviam.net 80
> Trying 65.34.152.103...
> Connected to nonserviam.net.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> GET /modperl/index.pl HTTP/1.1
&
I installed ModPerl today, am excited, it seems to *mostly* work,
however, every request is ending in a connection reset error. This is
difficult to search for, since this is apparently a common problem in NT
under some situations. I am running :
Mandrake Linux 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3-20mdk
s single httpd.exe binary and libapreq fails to link
to ap_table_add, ap_getword and many other symbols residing in apache
binary.
Alexander.
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Le
Does anybody working with cygwin can help Leonid to solve his problem?
Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:19:40 -0400
From: Leonid Zalechansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: The problem
The problem is then I run Makefile.PL under cygwin it does not start
perl
hello:
im trying to do away with as much of the CGI.pm as possible
one of the modules im using is HTML::Pager which utilizes
this
i was wondering if there is anyway to propagate
those variables from the request object
or maybe someone has another workaround?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:39:19PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> Thank you, much better. I can't make out the difference between the two
> command lines (again, I ask you to please clean up your script output,
> or just copy and paste from your terminal to your mailer, those ^Hs and
> ^]s make
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:10:16PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
>
> And that is a perl issue, but people around here are trying to be more
> helpful that the perl lot.
Ofcourse people here are also a 'perl lot', so take care. We're only
concentrating on one aspect of perl, that related to Apache.
Thank you, much better. I can't make out the difference between the two
command lines (again, I ask you to please clean up your script output,
or just copy and paste from your terminal to your mailer, those ^Hs and
^]s make things hard to decipher).
Can you do a "type perl perl5.6.0 perl5.6.1",
>
> > >Weirdly perl5.6.1 -V thinks it is perl 5.6.0 ?-S
>>
>> Please paste the entire output of perl5.6.1 -V so that we can see
>>what's wrong.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
>Here it comes:
>
>
>Script started on Thu Aug 16 16:12:49 2001
>doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/libdata$ find . -name \*Config.pm\* -print
>./
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:11:49PM -0400, Robert Landrum wrote:
> At 4:02 PM -0600 8/16/01, The Doctor wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:58:00AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> >>
> >> Hopefully this will point you in the right d
At 4:02 PM -0600 8/16/01, The Doctor wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:58:00AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>> Hopefully this will point you in the right direction. I would need more
>> data to figure it all out. As a next step
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:25:50AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > >
> >
> >/usr/libdata/perl5/i386-bsdos/Config.pm
>
> so this is fine, on linux this is called /i{3|4|5|6}86-linux/
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> > When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 .
> >
> > Identity crisis??
>
> Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and
>
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:58:00AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
>
> Hopefully this will point you in the right direction. I would need more
> data to figure it all out. As a next step, can you find the locations
> of the perls in q
> "TD" == The Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TD> But a rude questioner DOES provoke a storm.
You seem to be attempting to build up your same reputation here as you
did on the BSD/OS users list; soon everyone who knows the answers to
your questions will ignore you, like we did on the bs
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards
> > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes.
>
> Huh? I don't follow. Neither would Tom Baker ;-)
401 - 500 of 1123 matches
Mail list logo
