Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:18:11PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 . > > > > Identity crisis?? > > Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and >

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:55:26PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying itself as perl 5.6.0 . > > Identity crisis?? Dunno, but you can bet it's not right. Care to post the command and results? Sounds like a symlink problem, you might want to use some combination

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, The Doctor wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > > > > > Come off of it! > > > > I don't know where you got that

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:50:01PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:46:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > This is not going well with me as this forces to stay at perl 5.00503 until > > BSD/OS comes up with the new perl distrubution. > > Again, I don't follow. What

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:51:22PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > > > Come off of it! > > I don't know where you got that idea. When I ran perl 5.6.1 it was identifying its

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:47:09PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > perl 5.6.1 calling itself perl 5.6.0 > > Come off of it! I don't know where you got that idea.

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:46:24PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > This is not going well with me as this forces to stay at perl 5.00503 until > BSD/OS comes up with the new perl distrubution. Again, I don't follow. What leads you to that conclusion? - Barrie

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards > > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes. > > Huh? I don't follow. Neit

Re: modperl 2.0

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 03:49:30PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:39:09AM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > > > I will try, but this indicates to me that perl 5.6 is geared towards > > Linux without consideration for BSD/OS and related OSes. > > Huh? I don't follow. Neit

Re: Error decrypting in message using gpg in modperl script

> Anyone know why the decryption fails using gpg when run in a perl script in > a browser but works if run in a shell? Here's the code sample: > > my $cipher = < -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- > > pvbhS8Q22VYPqn+4sitEw0bgTmDhPo6rruzsSJxCHLBUyTPrYaPlmelF2iADCpKD > IeqIOK0KZwRMHrXrlFir37i+2NzmNzcF4k

Re: Error decrypting in message using gpg in modperl script

Chris See below. Cheers Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html > $PGP = "/usr/bin/gpg --no-secmem-warning -dar"; Ahhh. Does the web server, running as 'nobody' (perhaps) have permission to run 'gpg'?

Error decrypting in message using gpg in modperl script

Anyone know why the decryption fails using gpg when run in a perl script in a browser but works if run in a shell? Here's the code sample: my $cipher = <; close(PGP_READ); # Read any error messages. @errs = ; close(PGP_ERR); print "@errs"; This

Re: Want modperl-friendly web based email & website builderpackages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 4:02 PM +1000 8/7/01, Rod Butcher wrote: >I run a community ISP on Win32. Can anybody recommend modperl-friendly >packages to do :- WebMail.Com (Perl downloadable) works reasonably well. It's Perl CGI, not mod_perl, and the ver

Want modperl-friendly web based email & website builder packages

I run a community ISP on Win32. Can anybody recommend modperl-friendly packages to do :- 1. webmail via smtp. Looked at Acemail, development seems to have stopped. 2. web-based website builder package (templates, image upload, etc). thanks, Rod == This

RE: Problems running modperl under apache

Seems to have helped out a lot, thanks for pointing out those small changes.

Re: Problems running modperl under apache

On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Mark Vazquez wrote: Hi, > Recently i transfered over my company's existing websiste from winnt 4 > server with iis 4 to redhat 7.0 with apache 1.3.12/mod_perl 1.24. The > majority of the site is done in perl and there are perl scripts in almost > every directory. But apache

Problems running modperl under apache

Recently i transfered over my company's existing websiste from winnt 4 server with iis 4 to redhat 7.0 with apache 1.3.12/mod_perl 1.24. The majority of the site is done in perl and there are perl scripts in almost every directory. But apache cant seem to run them, my main site page is a perl fil

Re: modperl install on osx - help

hi in case someone will face the same problem: i installed successfully modperl 1.26 on apache 1.3.20 on OS X 10.0.4 using APXS. this worked fine while all other ways of installing failed for me. thanks for the help! christian on 03.09.40 00.09, Ken Williams at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Again, Modperl running scripts slower than non-modperl!?

r server? > > > > Trying to run close to 200 Mbyte modperl Apaches on a 256 Mbyte machine is > > not going to work. Have you looked at MaxRequestsPerChild? > > This is set at 0 What are you using to control process size? Apache::SizeLimit? It looks like you have some c

Re: Again, Modperl running scripts slower than non-modperl!?

ng to run close to 200 Mbyte modperl Apaches on a 256 Mbyte machine is > not going to work. Have you looked at MaxRequestsPerChild? This is set at 0 > But even the non-modperl servers at 30 Mbyte size seems ridiculously large: > are you sure you need all the modules that you compiled

Re: Again, Modperl running scripts slower than non-modperl!?

It actually get alot larger than that! Anywho, yes i have installed the latest libpreq, latest modperl, perl 5.6.1, apache 1.3.20 and on linux 2.2.19 Hope that helps. John 200 Megs for a modperl process sounds way off. Are you using an old version of libapreq? There is a big memory leak with

Re: Again, Modperl running scripts slower than non-modperl!?

80748K free8908K >cached > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM CTIME COMMAND >25788 nobody 0 0 126M 125M 1076 S 0.0 49.8 0:13 httpd ><modperl server >25787 nobody 0 0 196M 32M 1356 S 0.0 12.9 0:19 httpd >&

Again, Modperl running scripts slower than non-modperl!?

Ok guys,   Here goes again ... To refresh the standing: I am running my scripts on regular apache as the active server to the public. I am porting over my scripts to work properly with the modperl enable apache server. To do this when i am working on scripts and testing them, i start the

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > At 07:16 PM 8/1/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > > > I have a CGI application where I do: > > > > > > require 'db.pl'; > > > > > > where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to > > > the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

he database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. > > > > I tried to convert this application to modperl, but I ran into the problem > > that require did not execute db.pl again the second time I called the > > script, so that the C<$dbh = DBI->connect

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote: > I have a CGI application where I do: > > require 'db.pl'; > > where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to > the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. > > I t

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

At 07:16 PM 8/1/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: > > I have a CGI application where I do: > > > > require 'db.pl'; > > > > where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to > > the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. > > > > > I can get around this by

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

wrote: >I have a CGI application where I do: > >require 'db.pl'; > >where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to >the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. > >I tried to convert this application to modperl, but

Re: require v.s. do in modperl

> I have a CGI application where I do: > > require 'db.pl'; > > where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to > the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. > I can get around this by changing C to C, but is that the > "correct" way of doing things?

require v.s. do in modperl

I have a CGI application where I do: require 'db.pl'; where db.pl defines some functions and variables related to connecting to the database, and then executes C<$dbh = DBI->connect(...)>. I tried to convert this application to modperl, but I ran into the problem that requ

Re: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

John Buwa wrote: > Isnt there a way to clear global variable to a null after a web transaction > is complete? Apache::PerlRun does that. - Perrin

RE: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

> -Original Message- > From: John Buwa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 5:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl? > > > This seemed to hit it on the head, i really dont unders

Re: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

This seemed to hit it on the head, i really dont understand WHY this makes a difference in modperl and not nonmoperl services? I changed the count variable $i = 1 to my $i = 1 and the $msgnum to my $msgnum and it is working like the non modperl server does. Correctly. Isnt there a way to clear

Re: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

You might want to try declaring the file handles as LOCAL *myfile or whatever. You have to be very careful about making global variables with modperl since they have the benfit of sticking around after the web transaction is complete. ryan - Original Message - From: "John Buwa&quo

Re: More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

Hi John, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Buwa) wrote: >I am trying to finish up my scripts conversion to mod perl and here is a >routine i truely do not undestand why it is not working. You really have to turn on 'use strict'. It looks like both $i and $line are undeclared variables. Also, why do you

More stuff not working with conversion to modperl?

Hello,   I am trying to finish up my scripts conversion to mod perl and here is a routine i truely do not undestand why it is not working. This is the same code that is running on both the modperl i am useing to port scripts and test and the live non-modperl apache, which works fine:   This

Re: modperl confusing file/package

Quoting ryc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Or even, when my script accesses $Packagename::dbh as a > global > variable inside the Packagename package, only one such varaible exists > within that perl instance inside Apache (even though there should be > two). There can be only one. One package name, one

modperl confusing file/package

I have a script that runs under modperl very well. It consists of one main executable CGI file, and it 'requires' a few other pieces of source code. One of the files it requires is called db.pl. This file creates a package, and it contains several 'global' variables for th

Re: modperl install on osx - help

Christian, You should get the latest Apache, 1.3.20, instead of the old 1.3.14. Also try removing the 'USE_APACI=1' flag from your build line. That combo works for me under OS X 10.0.4. Perhaps it would work with USE_APACI=1 in there too, but I haven't tried. Christian Wattinger's message: >

Re: modperl install on osx - help

I was able to build mod_perl using these instructions. http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/Workbench/BuildingModPerl.html If that doesn't work, or you would like more help, I'd suggesting subscribing to this list. List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:

Re: modperl install on osx - help

Hi there, On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Christian Wattinger wrote: > im at the end of my wisdom here, > i try to install on mac osx following the advice > from > > > i dont get very far with it and i know still little about un

modperl install on osx - help

im at the end of my wisdom here, i try to install on mac osx following the advice from i dont get very far with it and i know still little about unixy stuff. im desperate because i need this mod_perl to work quickly (i

Re: Possible bug with ModPerl 1.25 and Escape_uri

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Stef Telford wrote: > Hello, > I hope this is the right place to put this. I have some code that takes data > from a database and encrypts it via Blowfish and CBC. Not a problem so far, > the problems comes with sending it to the client. ... > Now, if i look at t

Re: [ModPerl] missing POST args mystery

Ed Loehr wrote: > > > >I'm stumped ... > > >In a nutshell, my problem is that POSTed form key-value pairs are > > >intermittently not showing up in the request object inside my handler > > >subroutine. As I was puzzling over this, I saw this error message in the logs... (offline mode: e

RE: modperl install without Apache src?

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Ged Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Knox, Laurie A, NPONS wrote: > > >I read somewhere that there were potential problems when running > >mod_perl and PHP together in Apache, but I haven't been able to find > >that info again Is this an issue? > > I

Re: modperl install without Apache src?

Hi all, On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Ged Haywood wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Knox, Laurie A, NPONS wrote: >>> I was going to upgrade it to 1.25, but I don't have the Apache src. >> Why don't you just get it? > there should be no need if apache was properly

RE: modperl install without Apache src?

Hi there, On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Knox, Laurie A, NPONS wrote: >I read somewhere that there were potential problems when running >mod_perl and PHP together in Apache, but I haven't been able to find >that info again Is this an issue? I fear it is. Lots of people seem to run into trouble with

[ModPerl] missing POST args mystery

I'm stumped regarding some request object behavior in modperl, and after searching the Guide, Google, and the list archives without success, I'm hoping someone might offer another idea I could explore, or offer some helpful diagnostic questions. In a nutshell, my problem is that POSTe

Re: modperl install without Apache src?

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Ged Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Knox, Laurie A, NPONS wrote: > > > I was going to upgrade it to 1.25, but I don't have the Apache src. > > Why don't you just get it? there should be no need if apache was properly installed with a header tree. mod_pe

RE: modperl install without Apache src?

I don't have the source because the server was pre-installed by Solaris 8, and PHP is also installed on it. (I read somewhere that there were potential problems when running mod_perl and PHP together in Apache, but I haven't been able to find that info again Is this an issue?). I don't hav

Re: modperl install without Apache src?

Hi there, On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Knox, Laurie A, NPONS wrote: > I was going to upgrade it to 1.25, but I don't have the Apache src. Why don't you just get it? > Someone told me I just need to replace the libexec/libperl.so file Don't do it. Grab the latest sources and recompile, lots of bugfixe

Re: Possible bug with ModPerl 1.25 and Escape_uri

ST> I hope this is the right place to put this. I have some code that takes data ST> from a database and encrypts it via Blowfish and CBC. Not a problem so far, ST> the problems comes with sending it to the client. I can't comment on the difference between CGI::cookie and uri_escape,

Possible bug with ModPerl 1.25 and Escape_uri

e case of Blowfish encrypted text, but escape_uri in mod_perl doesnt. Any pointers or 'your stupid' are, as always, welcome. Regards and thanks Stef (Apache version is 1.3.17, modperl 1.25)

modperl install without Apache src?

Hi folks, Thanks to those who helped me out with the basic mod_perl questions I posted before. We're getting there! I have a question about mod_perl installation - I have Apache 1.3.9 running on a Solaris 8 machine with mod_perl 1.21. I was going to upgrade it to 1.25, but I don't have the Apac

Re: using XML::Parser with apache/modperl ???

On Tuesday 03 July 2001 18:06, Christian Wattinger wrote: > question: is it possibly (should certainly be) to use > the perl XML::Parser module with apache/modperl?? It is, though you need to compile with --disable-rule=EXPAT. Mod_perl should do that for you though. > when i run a

Re: using XML::Parser with apache/modperl ???

Christian Wattinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >hi > >question: is it possibly (should certainly be) to use >the perl XML::Parser module with apache/modperl?? I don't know about OS X, but my experience on OpenBSD requires Apache and XML::Parser be compiled with the same

Re: using XML::Parser with apache/modperl ???

ssibly (should certainly be) to use > the perl XML::Parser module with apache/modperl?? > - > - > i ran into some problems trying this, here is what > happened: > > i instal

using XML::Parser with apache/modperl ???

hi question: is it possibly (should certainly be) to use the perl XML::Parser module with apache/modperl?? - - i ran into some problems trying this, here is what happened: i installed expat

Re: ModPerl package Q

"Purcell, Scott" wrote: > > Hello, > Well, this is the last time I am going to bring this up. I am on Apache NT, > and I have the following .pm file that I believe I localized everything in > order to create a socket. The code below does work. But it never makes a > new socket. As you can see I

Re: ModPerl package Q

> Well, this is the last time I am going to bring this up. I am on Apache NT, > and I have the following .pm file that I believe I localized everything in > order to create a socket. The code below does work. But it never makes a > new socket. As you can see I print out the IO::Socket::GLOB and i

ModPerl package Q

Hello, Well, this is the last time I am going to bring this up. I am on Apache NT, and I have the following .pm file that I believe I localized everything in order to create a socket. The code below does work. But it never makes a new socket. As you can see I print out the IO::Socket::GLOB and it

RE: Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.25, win32

Sorry, my fault. You're right. Same Problem there. > -Original Message- > From: Tom Gioconda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 15 June, 2001 08:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.25, win32 > > > Okay, I

RE: Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.25, win32

> In my continuing quest to figure out how to port my > Apache/modperl stuff to > Windows per my company's "all win2k servers" mandate, I've been > playing with > Apache 1.3.20 and modperl on Windows. I was wondering if there > is anyway to > get this t

RE: Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.25, win32

che, because I can move to Apache 2 eventually, if I change to IIS, I probably can never go back. What's the verdict: am I simply damned to IIS? -Tom >From: Ender Josef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: 'Tom Gioconda' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.2

Apache 1.3.20, modperl 1.25, win32

In my continuing quest to figure out how to port my Apache/modperl stuff to Windows per my company's "all win2k servers" mandate, I've been playing with Apache 1.3.20 and modperl on Windows. I was wondering if there is anyway to get this thing to handle more than o

Re: Segfault on ppc-linux with modperl-1.25 with Apache 1.3.19 whencalling $r->send_fd()

perl/Apache.xs === RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl/src/modules/perl/Apache.xs,v retrieving revision 1.122 diff -u -r1.122 Apache.xs --- src/modules/perl/Apache.xs 2001/06/14 04:36:21 1.122 +++ src/modules/perl/Apache.xs 2001/06/14 05:24:25 @@ -956,6 +956,10 @@

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:58 PM > Of course some people run the bleeding edge versions on their servers > (either because they need some new features, unavailable in the stable > versions, or just because...). But these people usually don't complain on

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

G.W. Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have been a few problems reported with 5.6 and I have seen one > or two myself. > Although the problems which I saw were largely the result of slightly > dubious coding practices and were easily fixed, some people had more > serious problems and it'

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

Hmm maybe someone can tell me what I am doing wrong ??? Mithun -- Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 5 subversion 3) configuration: Platform: osname=linux, osvers=2.2.5-22smp, archname=i386-linux uname='linux porky.devel.redhat.com

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

I may be wrong on this but doesnt perl 5.05 come with CPAN v 1.48 ??? In anycase I am pretty sure I had to actually abort the upgrade if I wanted to keep my perl 5.05 everytime I tried to go to CPAN v 1.59. I will try to lay my hand on a clean box and try it out to see what happens and get back s

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

Hi there, On Sat, 5 May 2001, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user who uses > CPAN to keep track of his modules ??? I mean last time I did install > Bundle::libnet or even install CPAN I think it went ahead and installed > perl 5.6.1 It tr

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

Hi there, On Fri, 4 May 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > "G.W. Haywood" wrote: > > > Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should > > heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest > > version 5.005_03. > > curious - why 5.005_03 as opposed to the re

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

What version of the CPAN module do you have? Version 1.56+ should no longer "force" you to upgrade. Aaron Johnson ( is it 1.56 or 1.57, anyway 1.59 is out now and it doesn't force you to upgrade :^) Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: > Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user wh

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

Umm aren't we forgetting something here - like the average user who uses CPAN to keep track of his modules ??? I mean last time I did install Bundle::libnet or even install CPAN I think it went ahead and installed perl 5.6.1 Unless ofcourse installing everything from tar balls is what is suggested

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

On Fri, 4 May 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote: > "G.W. Haywood" wrote: > > > Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should > > heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest > > version 5.005_03. You must compile Perl, Apache and mod_perl with > > the sam

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

"G.W. Haywood" wrote: > Unfortunately you have an old version of Perl (5.004) so you should > heed the advice of the build scripts and upgrade. I would suggest > version 5.005_03. You must compile Perl, Apache and mod_perl with > the same compiler. curious - why 5.005_03 as opposed to the rece

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

i, 4 May 2001 16:26:16 +0530 > From: Qazi Firdous Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Regarding modperl installation > > Hi.. > > After having gone through your installation steps, i tried installing > with the same during which i encountered a c

Re: Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

AIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Regarding modperl installation > After having gone through your installation steps, i tried installing > with the same during which i encountered a couple of issues to be resolved. Building mod_perl takes place in several steps. Sim

Regarding modperl installation (fwd)

Gosh, sometimes I feel like I've forked the mod_perl mailing list :( -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 16:26:16 +0530 From: Qazi Firdous Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Regarding modperl installation Hi.. After having gone t

Re: unable to makefile of the modperl

some mails in the mailing list, some guy had got the same problem and u > had mentioned him to upgrade his Apache Version. Please tell me if i need > to do so. > I have Apache1.3.4 installed on my machine and modperl 1.25 version. > The problem comes once i give the Makefile comman

Re: unable to makefile of the modperl

, some guy had got the same problem and u had mentioned him to upgrade his Apache Version. Please tell me if i need to do so. I have Apache1.3.4 installed on my machine and modperl 1.25 version. The problem comes once i give the Makefile command. Perl Makefile APACHE_SRC=../../src NO_HTTPD=1 USE

Re: unable to makefile of the modperl

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Anuradha Satyanarayana wrote: > Unable to make the modperl Makefile.PL downloaded from perl.apache.org. > throwing errors like the following: > > > Checking for LWP::UserAgent..failed > Can't locate HTTP/Request.pm in @INC at lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm

unable to makefile of the modperl

Unable to make the modperl Makefile.PL downloaded from perl.apache.org. throwing errors like the following: Checking for LWP::UserAgent..failed Can't locate HTTP/Request.pm in @INC at lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm line 97. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm line 97.

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Francesco, I believe that Ian was joking, hence the yikes before the name, > > so the above post is the documentation! > > > > Ed > > > > .. so the best environment for the MVC++ design pattern is parrot/mod_parrot :) > http://www.oreilly.com/news/parrotstory_0401.ht

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

Quoting ed phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Francesco Pasqualini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sen

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Francesco Pasqualini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:11 PM > Subject: Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design patt

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Francesco Pasqualini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:11 PM Subject: Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern > > You can (I have) accomplish this with mod_pe

Patches for perl 5.6.1, Apache and modperl for the AIX 4.3 native dlopen

PGP message

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

> I' m using UniquePackages and because subs name conflict I need to put the > subs in the asp pages. > Can I still use initialization of global vars in the > global.asa/Spript_OnStart (as you suggest) ? > ...so the ASP/$Server->Transfer() is the equivalent of JSP/forward > I don't know if tra

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

- Original Message - From: "Joshua Chamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 3:54 AM Subject: Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > To avoid p

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To avoid passing many parameters to the subs I become using a $cx (cx stand for > context) global hash containig everything the subs needed, passed to each sub. > >page test.asp >$cx = {}; >$cx->{'name'} = 'default name'; >$cx->{'age'} = 30; >...

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

Quoting Joshua Chamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > > > > an interesting feature of JSP is the possibility to use the MVC design > pattern (INPUT/OUTPUT/LOGIC separation) > > This is obtained with the "forward" instruction. > > How the MVC design pattern can be implemen

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

At 10:01 AM 4/20/01 -0700, Perrin Harkins wrote: >On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > > But are there in the mod_perl architecture some guidelines and/or > > frameworks that encourages the MVC design patern ? I think that > > Apache::ASP could be (for example) the right tool, adding

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

At 15:44 20.04.2001 +0200, you wrote: >an interesting feature of JSP is the possibility to use the MVC design >pattern (INPUT/OUTPUT/LOGIC separation) >This is obtained with the "forward" instruction. >How the MVC design pattern can be implemented in the mod_perl (and >specifically Apache::ASP)

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 5:32 PM >Subject: Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern > >I think that Apache::ASP could be (for example) the right tool, adding the >"forward" feature. The forward seems to be an internal_redirec

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

You can (I have) accomplish this with mod_perl and HTML::Mason, Mason's root level autohandler can play the role of the JSP model 2 "controller servlet": dispatching logic processing to Perl objects (er, beans) and "forwarding" to a view (with the Mason $m->call_next or $m->comp mechanisms). I t

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

> Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > > an interesting feature of JSP is the possibility to use the MVC design pattern >(INPUT/OUTPUT/LOGIC separation) > This is obtained with the "forward" instruction. > How the MVC design pattern can be implemented in the mod_perl (and specifically >Apache::ASP) a

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Francesco Pasqualini wrote: > But are there in the mod_perl architecture some guidelines and/or > frameworks that encourages the MVC design patern ? I think that > Apache::ASP could be (for example) the right tool, adding the > "forward" feature. The forward feature looks lik

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

> But are there in the mod_perl architecture some guidelines and/or frameworks > that encourages the MVC design patern ? Apache::PageKit is a MVC based framework. You can find it on CPAN here: http://cpan2.org/Asset/display?dist=Apache-PageKit I wrote an article on it for take23: http://take

Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern

- Original Message -From: "Brett W. McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "Francesco Pasqualini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 5:32 PMSubject: Re: modperl/ASP and MVC design pattern> On Fri, 20 Apr

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >