On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
Sunday evening where?
sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be
there 8.30-9pm i guess.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moseley) wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
Sunday evening where?
sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be
there 8.30-9pm i guess.
Since it seems like Sunday night is the overwhelming favorite, I'll just
have to meet up with y'all
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
Sunday evening where?
sounds like the hotel bar is the only real option. i'll be
there 8.30-9pm i guess.
my flight arrives at 10:15 so i'll drop by the bar at 11:30 or so.
-jwb
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
speaking of which. there should be an opening night piss-up,
eh? somebody
On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
[...]
I'm sure SD hasn't got anything nearly as classy as the Eagle and Anchor
or whatever the place in Monterey was.
The sign said Crown Anchor. :-)
http://photo.tomat.dk/tpc4/dsc_4696.jpg
http://photo.tomat.dk/tpc4/dsc_4696.html
To whoever it
On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote:
Judging by where the hotel is, I think probably the hotel bar is going to
be best. I arrive on Sunday.
As do I. Just let me know where and when.
I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch of
modperlians ? I've
Wired Deskheld (www.microsoft.com)
-Original Message-
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BOF?
On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote:
Judging by where the hotel is, I think probably
--On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote:
I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch
of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they
aren't there I won't recognize anyone :)
don't worry, both these people will be there ;)
--
Eric
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Eric Cholet wrote:
--On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote:
I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch
of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they
aren't there I won't recognize anyone :)
don't worry,
At 01:19 PM 7/14/2001 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ken Williams
To: modperl
Sent: 7/14/01 11:48 AM
Subject: BOF?
Yo,
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one
At 12:10 AM 7/16/2001 -0500, James G Smith wrote:
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
At 12:10 AM 7/16/2001 -0500, James G Smith wrote:
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed
-Original Message-
From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Geoffrey Young; 'Ken Williams '; 'modperl '
Subject: RE: BOF?
[snip]
If you like, I guess I could try organizing to get a BOF
room? The only
mod_perl BOF I
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Eric Cholet wrote:
--On 16/07/01 16:48 +0200 Robin Berjon wrote:
I arrive on Sunday evening too, is there a good way to recognize a bunch
of modperlians ? I've only ever seen two people on this list so if they
aren't
I'm pretty easy to tag out of a croud, I'm pretty sure I'm starting the
week with pink hair again (I'm gonna end it with blue or green).
I'm getting there sunday around 5ish.
Scott
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2001 07:10, James G Smith wrote:
Judging by where
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
At 12:10 AM 7/16/2001 -0500, James G Smith wrote:
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
speaking of which. there should
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
speaking of which. there should
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one
Yo,
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
------
Ken Williams Last
-Original Message-
From: Ken Williams
To: modperl
Sent: 7/14/01 11:48 AM
Subject: BOF?
Yo,
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
I thought Gunther
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
speaking of which. there should be an opening night piss-up,
eh? somebody
speaking of which. there should be an opening night piss-up,
eh? somebody that knows the area should propose a place.
Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in until Tuesday noon.
At the same time, I'm recovering at the moment from last night's piss-up...
I don't think I'll need a
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Richard Dice wrote:
Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in
until Tuesday noon. At the same time, I'm recovering at
the moment from last night's piss-up... I don't think
I'll need a repeat anytime soon. Still, I'm sure the
company would be fun. :-)
umm,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moseley) wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Richard Dice wrote:
Which opening night would that be? I'm not getting in
until Tuesday noon. At the same time, I'm recovering at
the moment from last night's piss-up... I don't think
I'll need a repeat anytime soon. Still, I'm
- brian moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/14/01 10:43:42 -0700:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
I just noticed that there's no mod_perl BOF listed at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/pub/10/bofs.html .
Is one scheduled? If not, let's get one together.
speaking
:17
AM
Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference
TShirts
A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl
BOF.One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted
interest on here. So if they are still up for it, it would be awesome to
start discussing ideas/proof
: Gunther Birznieks
To: mod_perl list
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts
A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF.
One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted
interest
To: mod_perl list
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: mod_perl bof Oreilly Conference TShirts
A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF.
One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted
interest on
here. So
Gunther == Gunther Birznieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gunther A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF.
Gunther One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted interest
Gunther on here. So if they are still up for it, it would be awesome to start
Gunther
A month ago I posed a question about TShirts for mod_perl BOF.
One group of people did volunteer to do the design and posted interest on
here. So if they are still up for it, it would be awesome to start
discussing ideas/proof of concept.
However, before such a thing can be discussed
.
Jimi
- Original Message -
From: Gunther
Birznieks
To: Jimi
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: OReilly Mod_Perl BoF TShirts
No, we don't have a design yet as far I know. I am not really
organizing it. I just thought I would post quickly to see what ideas
At 09:19 PM 5/15/01 -0500, Jimi Thompson wrote:
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gunther Birznieks
To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Jimi Thompson
No, we don't have a design yet as far I know. I am not really organizing
it. I just thought I would post quickly to see what ideas people pop up
because at
OK, so there are a lot of mod_perl talks this time..(YAY!)
But what about the BoF. Will anyone be sponsoring a T-Shirt and/or design
this time around? I figured I would ask because I know we ended up talking
about this like a week before ApacheCon/Santa Clara and it seemed like it
was too
hi all...
over a few beers last night, we (anyone who was drinking:) decided that
tonight would be a better time for the BOF than 9am this morning (or any
morning for that matter)
seeing as how we don't have a room though, I thought that the pool was as
good a place to meet as anywhere
FYI...
-Original Message-
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:59 PM
To: BOF submitters
Subject: Re: Changes to BOF schedule..!
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Due to a bit of confusion, the BOF schedule next week requires
hi ken...
the mod_perl BOF (BOF09) should not go up against any mod_perl session if
it can be avoided
as it stands now, this means it could fit in late afternoon/evening on
thursday, nearly any time on friday, or wherever you decide it should go
after the rearrangement...
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:41 AM
To: Dave Rolsky
Cc: mod_perl list
Subject: Re: mod_perl BOF
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tuesday night?
That's a no-brainer. The hotel bar!
(I'm not really obsessed with beer, honest guvnor)
--
Matt/
/||** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ **
//||**
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation?
Why not during a time slot when there are no mod_perl presentations?
This is not rocket science here.
I'm creating my own "Bee
Stas Bekman wrote:
Last week I was presenting mod_perl at the Linux World Show in Singapore
and we had a really nice social event with a babe belly dancer... hey,
Gunther was dancing with her... just look at his happy face :)
Man, when I see stuff like that, I know I'm in the right business.
"Pierre" == Pierre Phaneuf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pierre Stas Bekman wrote:
Last week I was presenting mod_perl at the Linux World Show in Singapore
and we had a really nice social event with a babe belly dancer... hey,
Gunther was dancing with her... just look at his happy face :)
Which hotel?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tuesday night?
That's a no-brainer. The hotel bar!
(I'm not really obsessed with beer, honest guvnor)
--
Matt/
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which hotel?
The Westin Santa Clara - where the conf is being held.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
speaking of which, is there a meeting place for tuesday night?
well, I am embarrassed to have to say that the sponsor who had committed to
the shirts this year bailed on us.
it has nothing to do with the contents of this thread - apparently the
product they wanted to market isn't fully baked yet and they thought that
the shirts were premature (and too
Geoffrey Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 03/28/2001:
well, I am embarrassed to have to say that the sponsor who had committed to
the shirts this year bailed on us.
it has nothing to do with the contents of this thread - apparently the
product they wanted to market
-Original Message-
From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
Geoffrey Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this
effect on 03/28/2001:
well, I am embarrassed
At 08:29 28/03/2001 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
From: darren chamberlain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Might this be a good time to consider Cafe Press, then?
as it turns out, the graphics house was actually the sponsor
them bailing means that we don't even get a design...
But if there _was_
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Might this be a good time to consider Cafe Press, then?
Geoffrey as it turns out, the graphics house was actually the sponsor
Geoffrey them bailing means that we don't even get a design...
If it's designs you want, I could probably get
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: 'darren chamberlain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
"Geo
--- julie wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Why hasn't anyone made tanktops for the ladies?
T-tops! woo-hoo!
Actually, I really do think it's a great idea. =o)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation?
Why not during a time slot when there are no mod_perl presentations?
This is not rocket science here.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==*/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Rolsky
To: mod_perl list
Sent: 3/28/01 6:08 PM
Subject: mod_perl BOF
Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation?
I dunno. Stas asked me to reserve a slot for it. I didn't specify a time
so this is what we got I guess.
Why
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Absolutely. I've CC'd the ApacheCon planners so hopefully they can step in
and fix things.
Doh, I should've done this in the first place. I ended up mailing Stewart
Quealy separately. Sorry for everyone who's seeing this multiple times.
-dave
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Why was this scheduled during Matt Sergeant's AxKit presentation?
Why not during a time slot when there are no mod_perl presentations?
This is not rocket science here.
I'm creating my own "Beer BOF", every night in the hotel bar. Yo
Jonathan Gardner wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has
worked out...
what do you want to do about T-Shirts?
For me, three ideas stand out...
1) I did like the ModDonalds idea...
What about
"Tim" == Tim Sweetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tim (But Trademark Difficulties(tm) probably take out this idea; there are
Tim better legal fights to be had).
But in the US, we have safe harbor because of the 2 live crew supreme
court case. This is a parody, remember!?
Of course, you're own
theme
How about a picture of a card game; on the table
are a 9 of diamonds, Jack of Clubs, and King of spades.
The dealer is about to play the Ace of perl.
The caption reads, "mod_perl does the trick".
Also in the dealer's hand are cards that say,
IIS
iPlanet
I am so sorry to have to add one more comment to this thread but I am
afraid that I am being misquoted. The quotation below IS NOT MINE though
it appears that way by incomplete quoting to someone who didn't get my
original post!
Again, it came from Sherman Alexie a Coeur d'Alen Indian who wrote
So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has
worked out...
what do you want to do about T-Shirts?
For me, three ideas stand out...
1) I did like the ModDonalds idea...
2) I wasn't at last years conference, I really like the World Domination
one and wished I could
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
First I vote for Randal's ModDonald's idea.
Secondly I had an idea and here is crude representation of it.
It is Tux the Linux Penguin acting like that character from the movie "the
Predator" with a Gatling gun strapped across his chest with pe
"Bakki" == Bakki Kudva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bakki It is Tux the Linux Penguin acting like that character from the
Bakki movie "the Predator" with a Gatling gun strapped across his
Bakki chest with perl bullets (on the ammo belt and shooting out of
Bakki the muzzle) and when they hit the
I'd like to officially vote for Maude Pearl, the 1920's Bettie Paige-ish
dominatrix-esque mod_perl mascot.
Put a woman in black fishnets on a t-shirt with the word 'perl' on it and
you won't be able to fit enough of them into the convention to meet the
demand. :)
--
Blue Lang
Blue Lang wrote:
I'd like to officially vote for Maude Pearl, the 1920's Bettie Paige-ish
dominatrix-esque mod_perl mascot.
Wow. I've had "perl6 themes" as a background process for a while now.
SM is certainly a meme that precious few other programming languages
have made use of ...
SM is certainly a meme that precious few other programming languages
have made use of ...
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/bondage-and-discipline-language.html
Well, close...
Cheers,
Richard
--
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
So apart from the Native American thread which I believe everyone has
worked out...
what do you want to do about T-Shirts?
For me, three ideas stand out...
1) I did like the ModDonalds idea...
What about this? (this would have to appear
On 22 Mar 2001 11:42:26 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
But mod_perl is not just Linux. mod_perl runs just fine on those
redmond-based so-called "operating systems", as well as BSD (little
devil, anyone?) and Unix, and starting saturday, MacOS X!
I was thinking about
Nick Tonkin wrote:
Personally I find the very name Apache a little uncomfortable..
... but the relevance of an http server to the Apache nation
escapes me (and the symbolizing of the Apache nation with a feather
strikes me as stereotypical at best).
Most of you will have seen, at least in
Randal 42 billion has the right sound to it. It's "the answer", after
all,
Randal a billion times over. :)
I like it! Maybe a big round pearl with a smiley-face
and a headband with feather sticking up in the back
with the words "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters
printed below :)
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 15:11:13 -0500
Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, we may have a winner with the Native American and lamp idea.
A
coworker suggested a peace pipe (picture an indian smoking perl) instead
of
a lamp, since you don't see warriors holding lamps often. maybe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't
tongue-in-cheek,
lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!!
Geoffrey well, of course - but much folly leaves the list
Well, I've been resisting any replies here, especially since I've *never*
been accused of being "politically correct", but since we're tossing
in pennies, here are my two:
I agree that the use of *any* symbols of a race or religion to represent a
sports team (or anything else of that ilk) is at
I realize that the subject is OT, but let's not get into a political (or
whatever) debate on the list.
there will be no images of anything picking on any particular demographic
(be it Python or Native Americans) so please take this discussion offline...
I am sorry this turned into something
--- Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually, we may have a winner with the Native American and lamp
idea. A coworker suggested a peace pipe (picture an indian smoking
perl) instead of a lamp, since you don't see warriors holding lamps
often. maybe some smoke signals?
Thought
--- Nick Tonkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
. . .
I for one would appreciate a design that doesn't fetishize a
culture and people that have already had enough abuse at the hands
of 'American' people.
Hear, hear.
Personally I find the very name
On 21 Mar 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:
You mean apart from the trademark infringement? I know, what about
"mod_perl is my bNO CARRIER
All your base are belong to mod_perl
??
MBM g, d rlh
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 8980 5714 (Home)
http://colondot.net/ Work:
[extensive snippage]
How about a bunch of white shirts? One magic marker per shirt and
everyone can draw their own picture of a computer.
alternatively,
"No-one could decide on an image so
all we got was this lousy sentence."
Dave
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:14:53AM -0800, Paul wrote:
--- Nick Tonkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I find the very name Apache a little uncomfortabl. I get
the joke about it being a patchy server (although now the ratio of
original NCSA code to `new' code is so miniscule as to
Steve Reppucci wrote:
Some folks spend way too much time looking for something to be offended
by, again IMHO.
I'm pretty sure that for any thing you might find, I would be able to
find someone offended by it.
Let's no do anything too obvious (a camel ramming up stuff up Bill Gates
ass would
Bakki Kudva wrote:
Just look at the sports teams. You couldn't have a team called the
Washington Kikes or the Washington Micks. But yet you can have the
Washington Redskins and this Indian with a big nose and big lips running
around. How would you feel if it was the Washington Rabbis and you
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
another note to throw out there -- o'reilly claims trademarks on
the camel/perl association and the mod_perl/eagle association,
so someone will either need to get permission from them to print a
shirt perpetuating those associations, or come up with a
Hey! I really like the "camel ramming up stuff up Bill Gates ass" one! Can
we go with that? No? Crap!
-Original Message-
From: pp [mailto:pp]On Behalf Of Pierre Phaneuf
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:52 AM
To: mod_perl list
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
Steve Repp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Farber (EED)) wrote:
Bakki Kudva wrote:
Just look at the sports teams. You couldn't have a team called the
Washington Kikes or the Washington Micks. But yet you can have the
Washington Redskins and this Indian with a big nose and big lips running
around. How would
On 19 Mar 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"mod_perl: 20 billion hits served"
And turn the "m" into a stylized arch. :)
Nick er, maybe 20 trillion ... ? seeing as how ValueClick alone has done a bit
Nick over 42 billion since 6/98 ... :)
yeah, I was hoping valueclick would jump out and
well, thanks everyone for your suggestions (maybe :)
I just thought I'd sum up some of the issues that we dealt with last year:
o the Eagle and Apache feather are off limits - we didn't get permission
to use them last year and don't expect that to change.
o the shirt is going to have a
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz of selling any. the logistics
of that is just too much.
Maybe using a service like Cafe Press to sell the shirts would
work? http://www.cafepress.com/ I know I'd be interested in purchasing a
shirt.
Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz of selling any. the
logistics
of that is just too much.
What about using a service like www.cafepress.com where you upload the
artwork and they take care of all the logistics: order taking, payment,
-Original Message-
From: David Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Geoffrey Young; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
o unfortunately, we can't get into the biz
It would also be easy enough to upload the artwork from last year.
I'd use the same artwork, but change mod_perl to mod_perl 2.0. Alas, with
all the latest development Doug has done for mod_perl 2.0, it seems that
the release of Apache 2.0 will be the main show stopper. So let's keep the
folks
Hi
( 01.03.20 10:36 -0500 ) Geoffrey Young:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
though :)
But those are the best ones! And puns and other word play are a part of
perl culture!
Also, just for my information, who decides on the theme and how do they
do it?
--
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
--- Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
lol! Why
Randal 42 billion has the right sound to it. It's "the answer", after all,
Randal a billion times over. :)
I like it! Maybe a big round pearl with a smiley-face
and a headband with feather sticking up in the back
with the words "Don't Panic" in large friendly letters
printed below :)
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still need more suggestions for a theme that aren't tongue-in-cheek,
lol! Why, I thought that was the idea!!!
Geoffrey well, of course - but much folly leaves the list innundated with (albeit
Geoffrey funny) postings but not much for
So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I
thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be
cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues).
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==*/
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of
a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an
"indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok, but think
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:59 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the lamp/bottle into the hands of
a well-built Native American figure (a warrior-type is great, but an
"indian princess" has subliminal appealok, ok, but think about it,
lol!)
I think the graphics house
"Geoffrey" == Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Geoffrey sorry Randal - I guess I just found it so funny that I
Geoffrey didn't think you were really serious about it (I saw the big
Geoffrey glowing M and nearly snarfed my coffee :)
As a professional comedian, I *demand* that my name
-Original Message-
From: Dave Rolsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] ApacheCon BOF
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
If you get a really good artist, put the lamp
"Dave" == Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave So as not to be a total spoilsport, I would like to point out that I
Dave thought Randal's idea (Mcmod_perl?) was rather clever and I think it'd be
Dave cool (though I don't know if there are trademark issues).
Remember. It's a Parody.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
