John Chiu wrote:
Thanks in advance. I've tried all the archives and google'd but I have
not found anything that would help.
I'm running RH 8.0, httpd-2.0.40-11.5 and mod_perl-1.99_05-3 from the
RedHat distribution. I'm trying to create a small proxy module that will
check a non-proxy request
Thanks in advance. I've
tried all the archives and google'd but I have not found anything that would
help.
I'm running RH 8.0,
httpd-2.0.40-11.5 and mod_perl-1.99_05-3 from the RedHat distribution. I'm
trying to create a small proxy module that will check a non-proxy request and
dependi
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Ross Matt-QMR000 wrote:
> I would really like to be removed from this list but the
> un-scribe does not work for me. the problem is the mail address
> that I used way back when has been aliases to different
> address.
Try sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for some sugges
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Jamie Krasnoo wrote:
> So I've decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like it but
> find the documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot
> missing. I tried Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an
> error to the effect that it didn't know what "bootstrap" was (I
> So I've decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like it but find the
> documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot missing. I tried
> Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an error to the effect that it
> didn't know what "bootstrap" was (I think that was it). Apache::Cookie
> made i
So I’ve decided to dive headlong into 2.0. So far I like
it but find the documentation lacking and there seems to be a lot missing. I
tried Apache::Cookie with it, no dice. It gave an
error to the effect that it didn’t know what “bootstrap” was
(I think that was it). Apache::Cookie made ins
I put together notes on how I was porting this module:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/porting/porting.html#How_C_Apache__MP3__was_ported_to_mod_perl_2_0
I hope you find it useful.
I've posted earlier the link to the ported module:
http://stason.org/tmp/Apache-MP3-3.04.tar.gz
The document abov
Title: MOD_PERL 2.0?
just as a test I used the "ALL in ONE" package to get this installed and it works like a champ except for Apache::compat errors with something about line 68. =( I don't have the error infront of me but it is something like method not defined.
On Thu, 29 May 2003, FARRINGTON, RYAN wrote:
> -- I don;t know if the first message was sent but here it is
> again -- just as a test I used the "ALL in ONE" package to get
> this installed and it works like a champ except for
> Apache::compat errors with something about line 68. =( I don't
> have
Title: MOD_PERL 2.0?
-- I don;t know if the first message was sent but here it is again --
just as a test I used the "ALL in ONE" package to get this installed and it works like a champ except for Apache::compat errors with something about line 68. =( I don't have the error in
for those who haven't already seen it, perl.com ran the second of my series
of articles on mod_perl 2.0 late last week. the title is actually a bit
decieving. it's about using the Apache-Test testing framework, but although
Apache-Test is shown in a mod_perl 2.0 context, Apache-T
Stas Bekman wrote:
Denis Banovic wrote:
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache->request->register_cleanup(\&init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with
mod_perl
Denis Banovic wrote:
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache->request->register_cleanup(\&init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with mod_perl
2?
A copy-n-paste
Hi!
I've a script that looks like this:
if ($runnung_on_mod_perl) {
Apache->request->register_cleanup(\&init_globals);
}
Under mod_perl 1.0 works fine with Apache::Registry.
Can someone give me an Example how to make a register_cleanup with mod_perl
2?
Thanks a lot
Denis
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 & mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r->connection object not having "auth_type" or "user" defined. The
$r->auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
should I look for, or use?
[
Brian P Millett wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Brian Millett wrote:
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 & mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r->connection object not having "auth_type" or "user" defined. The
$r->auth_type work just f
Stas Bekman wrote:
Brian Millett wrote:
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 & mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r->connection object not having "auth_type" or "user" defined. The
$r->auth_type work just fine. Are these the same
Brian Millett wrote:
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 & mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r->connection object not having "auth_type" or "user" defined. The
$r->auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
shou
Hi,
I've just about got the Apache::AuthCookieDBI to work with Apache
2.0.44 & mod_perl 1.99_09-dev, but I ran into a problem with the
$r->connection object not having "auth_type" or "user" defined. The
$r->auth_type work just fine. Are these the same reference? What
should I look for, or use?
CGI scripts
execute OK, but are slow ... This might be a more general
problem that should be looked at first
>
> > If so, then it might be that you're running
> > into the fact that mod_perl 2.0 on Win32 has problems with
> > perl-5.6.1 (ActivePerl 6xx), and t
might be that you're running
> into the fact that mod_perl 2.0 on Win32 has problems with
> perl-5.6.1 (ActivePerl 6xx), and that the solution would be to
> migrate to perl-5.8.0 (ActivePerl 8xx).
As long as I don't have a DBD-Mysql afterwards, that's not possible other
than fo
erhaps the first thing to check - does
LoadFile "C:/Perl/bin/perl56.dll"
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
alone, without any further mod_perl directives, prevent the
server from starting? If so, then it might be that you're running
into the fact that mod_perl 2.0 on W
Hi all,
if you would be willing to spend a minute on helping me out of this: I'm
trying to get mod_perl-2 running on Win32. Without success, of course. :(
My box is a Win2k SP3 with 1GB RAM, ActivePerl 5.6.1 build 633, mod_perl-2
1.99_09-dev on Apache 2.0.43. Everything is freshly loaded and inst
Jérôme Augé wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:27:38AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
Cool. Now can you please send the shortest possible example that you still
get the SEGFAULT with, so I can reproduce it and fix? Thanks.
I finally got a working apache2+mod_perl working in my $HOME dir (I
coul
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:27:38AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> Cool. Now can you please send the shortest possible example that you still
> get the SEGFAULT with, so I can reproduce it and fix? Thanks.
>
I finally got a working apache2+mod_perl working in my $HOME dir (I
could not find the co
Jérôme Augé wrote:
I grep'ed into the mod_perl sources and found in
examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm that send_http_header does not exists
in mod_perl 2.0 and print is not yet implemented. Is this right ? so
this could "easily" explain my problems :)
It's an old example, I
Jérôme Augé wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:09:37AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've applied a fix that hopefully cures this thing in cvs. Please try
again with the latest cvs version.
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution
Since you've never sent the b
I grep'ed into the mod_perl sources and found in
examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm that send_http_header does not exists
in mod_perl 2.0 and print is not yet implemented. Is this right ? so
this could "easily" explain my problems :)
in examples/lib/Apache/HelloWorld.pm :
[.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:09:37AM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> I've applied a fix that hopefully cures this thing in cvs. Please try
> again with the latest cvs version.
> http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html#2_0_Development_Source_Distribution
>
I installed the CVS version (1.9909) an
Jérôme Augé wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:32:29PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHeaderParserHandler Apache::Plop
Well, this is not really what I want to do ...
I would like to catch all the "proxy request" and apply modifications to
the requested document be
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:32:29PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlHeaderParserHandler Apache::Plop
>
>
Well, this is not really what I want to do ...
I would like to catch all the "proxy request" and apply modifications to
the requested document before for
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jérôme Augé wrote:
[...]
After making your example work, I don't see any segfaults. Please try
again with modperl-1.99_08 which was released a few days ago.
[...]
1. You can't push_handlers when you are inside a response handler.
Use PerlHeaderParserHandler instead
I've
Jérôme Augé wrote:
Hi,
I'm beginning with mod_perl (mod_perl-1.99_05 + Apache 2.0.40 from
RedHat 8.0) and I want to write a module for rewriting the documents
that passes through the Apache proxy. So, I looked at the
Apache::AdBlocker
(http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/tips/mod_perl_tricks
Hi,
I'm beginning with mod_perl (mod_perl-1.99_05 + Apache 2.0.40 from
RedHat 8.0) and I want to write a module for rewriting the documents
that passes through the Apache proxy. So, I looked at the
Apache::AdBlocker
(http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/tips/mod_perl_tricks/mod_perl_tricks.html#A
Dale Lancaster wrote:
Thanks for the information. I did try removing Apache:DBI, but it still
fails.
OK
Building everything from source will be time consuming. If I do
that, I will probably just drop back to Apache 1.3 since I know it works.
It's not time consuming at all, just follow the
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 standard Apache2.0 and mod_perl 2.0::PerlRun
doesn't work?
Dale Lancaster wrote:
> I have searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and
> its associated resolution to no avail.
>
> I upgraded my working
Dale Lancaster wrote:
I have searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and
its associated resolution to no avail.
I upgraded my working Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1.x website using the
PerlRun option of modperl to the RedHat 8.0 standard release with
Apache/mod_perl 2.0
I have
searched the archives and various websites to find my problem and its associated
resolution to no avail.
I
upgraded my working Apache 1.3 and mod_perl 1.x website using the PerlRun option
of modperl to the RedHat 8.0 standard release with Apache/mod_perl 2.0 combo --
bad move it
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On 17 Dec 2002, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[...]
I'm in a difficult position because the project will be completed in a
couple of months. If the consensus is that mod_perl 2.0 will be
released by that point, then everything will be fine (I'll develop using
the
On 17 Dec 2002, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
[...]
> I'm in a difficult position because the project will be completed in a
> couple of months. If the consensus is that mod_perl 2.0 will be
> released by that point, then everything will be fine (I'll develop using
> the beta
On Dec 17 Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> Can anyone offer any information about when they feel mod_perl will be
> stable enough for use in a production environment?
Sometime next year.
See:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">http://mathforum.org/epigone/modperl/krekrouslor/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, back to lurking.
I am starting a new project that makes use of functionality required in
Apache 2. Naturally, I would like to use mod_perl, but mod_perl 2.0 is
still in beta.
Can anyone offer any information about when they feel mod_perl will be
stable enough for use in a production environment? I intend to use
So, I have updated my src of apache, arp and mod_perl2 from cvs. Still the exact same result.
I've messed up while adjusting for the new libapr's naming. it's fixed now in
cvs. Though you shouldn't have had a problem in first place. it'd have just
skipped linking to the apr libs and shouldn't
Hello,
Stas, I didn't take offense at your first reply.
Steven, I'm sorry if my post was in any way insulting or otherwise offensive.
Stas, I do understand - more with every piece of code I add to my box - that the xnix
world and esp. the open source core of that world is a constantly shifting o
Is there a reason that we have to be this insulting?
Beckman, I really expected more out of you.
> > LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o
> > ../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so
> > -L/usr/local/apache2/2.0.43/lib -lapr -laprutil
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -la
D. Fairbanks wrote:
[...]
LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/lib" gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib APR.o -o
../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/APR/APR.so -L/usr/local/apache2/2.0.43/lib
-lapr -laprutil
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lapr
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [../../../blib/arch/Apache2/auto/AP
s but I've spent the past six months
studying and building and resolving myriad confilcts and dependancies on
this server:
Red Hat v8.0
Apache v2.0.43
perl v5.8.0
gcc v 3.2 (2002 09 03)
mod_perl 2.0 (nee 1.99_07)
apr 0.9.1
apr-util 0.9.1
(I must confess that if I hadn't seen the rock-solid s
Your attention please:
[***]
[*** ***]
[*** please send the followups back to the list! ***]
[*** ***]
[***]
Th
please remember to properly report problems, as explained at:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#Reporting_Problems
(hint: the shortcuts menu on the left side of any page of perl.apache.org)
if you don't provide all the required details it makes it hard to guess
what configuration
Hi
I am new to linux and mod_perl. We are
running perl 5.8.0 and apache 2.0.43 on linux. First time we are
trying to install mod_perl2. But the "make test" failed
completed. Here is the error_log reads:
<<
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=19385[Thu Nov 21
11:24:45 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.43
If you come to ApacheCon and plan to go to the mod_perl 2.0 presentation
on Wed, after the lunch, here are the handouts if you want to print
them. The conference organizers won't give printed versions, in order to
cut costs. So here it's:
http://stason.org/talks/apachecon2002/pr
hi all...
I had a few moments so I've started to port Apache::Clean over to
mod_perl 2.0. it's far from complete, and I haven't examined all the
issues with proper caching headers yet, but you can find the work in
progress here:
http://www.modperlcookbook.org/~geoff/modul
Tom Hibbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Solaris 8 and have installed Apache 2:
>
> bash-2.03# /usr/apache/bin/httpd -v
> Server version: Apache/2.0.39
> Server built: Aug 20 2002 11:26:54
>
> I also have installed perl 5.8.0:
>
> bash-2.03# perl -v
>
> This is perl, v5.8.0 built for sun4-
Hi,
I am running Solaris 8 and have installed Apache 2:
bash-2.03# /usr/apache/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.39
Server built: Aug 20 2002 11:26:54
I also have installed perl 5.8.0:
bash-2.03# perl -v
This is perl, v5.8.0 built for sun4-solaris
I am trying to install mod_perl 2 an
ely, it was not on a
very important production system, and rebuilding the tools fixed the
problem.
In anticipation of the postmortem meeting, I'm trying to find out if this
problem still exists in mod_perl 2.0. Websearches have been fruitless; any
pe[a]rls of wisdom from the list?
Charlton
ely, it was not on a
very important production system, and rebuilding the tools fixed the
problem.
In anticipation of the postmortem meeting, I'm trying to find out if this
problem still exists in mod_perl 2.0. Websearches have been fruitless; any
pe[a]rls of wisdom from the list?
Charlton
Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have look around the documentation of mod_perl 2.0 and I'm looking if
> it's possible with the current mod_perl API to add a method (like GET,
> HEAD) in apache to extend the functionnaly of the HTTP server ?
>
> Ther
to run on the win32 platform
- mod_perl to allow for persistent (stay connected on the server side)
Net::Telnet objects (CGI is unacceptable since a new process is spawned at
each request leaving no room for persistent objects)
- Multiple perl interpreters of Apache2 / mod_perl 2.0 to serve mor
Hello,
I have look around the documentation of mod_perl 2.0 and I'm looking if
it's possible with the current mod_perl API to add a method (like GET,
HEAD) in apache to extend the functionnaly of the HTTP server ?
There is also some possibility with the new framework to add ne
X=>(10*1024));
> $apr->args; #get your params here...
> }
>
> What is the suggested technique for mod_perl 2.0?
>
> I understand that Apache::Request is replaced with Apache::RequestRec and
nope. Apache::Request for 2.0 is being in development (the c library
first),
suggested technique for mod_perl 2.0?
I understand that Apache::Request is replaced with Apache::RequestRec and
Apache::RequestIO and Apache::Request does not compile with a complaint of
Can't locate object method "boot" via package "mod_perl::boot" at
C:/Perl/site/lib/Apache/Tabl
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, still getting the same errors during "make test".
>
> One of the first lines of the "perl Makefile.PL --blahblah" shows:
>
> Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0
>
> Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't
> "take"?
may
When I "perl --version" should it show me 5.8.0 RC2?
Thanks,
-Zac
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 20
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you
> that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you
> say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+
I've updated the README file, which now states what you need.
All the troub
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
> Zac Morris wrote:
> > Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS t
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that
> installed 2.0.40-dev
>
> and I'm still getting errors during "make test" of mod_perl 2. Does it have
> to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile?
Yes, to compile 1.99_04
> Sorry if I'm just not getting
;
To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
>
> > errors:
> > using Apache/2.0.36 (prefork MPM)
>
> because you must use 2.0.39.
>
>
>
build to get all the pm files in place, then rebuild my
> mod_perl 2 (against my installed Apache 2 source).
Sorry Zac, my diagnosis and patch were wrong. mod_perl 2.0's compat
layer doesn't require mod_perl 1.0 to be installed, sorry for confusing
people.
Apache::Module *is* in 2
om: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
> Zac Morris wrote:
> > Ahhh, ok more clarity. :)
> >
> > Forgi
Zac Morris wrote:
> Ahhh, ok more clarity. :)
>
> Forgive me if I'm just not doing my detective work in poking around for
> documentation, but is there a doc that contains all the "kludges" or
> "assumed modules" I need to already have in place?
All the docs that we have now are at
http://perl.
Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0
> Zac Morris wrote:
> > Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
> >
> > use Apache2();
> > use Apache::compat
Zac Morris wrote:
> Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
>
> use Apache2();
> use Apache::compat;
>
> and I'm still getting the errors:
>
> Undefined subroutine &Apache::Module::loaded called at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95.
> Compilation failed
Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions:
use Apache2();
use Apache::compat;
and I'm still getting the errors:
Undefined subroutine &Apache::Module::loaded called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95.
Compilation failed in require at ./db_connect_test.pm li
At 00:49 23.06.2002, Charles Aulds wrote:
>At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
>>1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
>
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>>As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will
need to:
>>1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas
said,
>> Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
>
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested
with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need t
x27;m getting a can't find Apache.pm
>>>
>>>To use Apache::DBI do I need the old mod_perl 1 also installed running some
>>>kind of "dual mode"? Or is that not even an option since I'm running
>>>Apache2. I'm learning quick so if this is cove
>> but first you need:
>>
>> PerlModule Apache2
>>
>> or 'use Apache2' in startup.pl. see:
>>
>http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#Accessing_the_mod_perl_2_0_Modules
>
>>
>
>
> Nope, he did a "clean" mod_perl 2 install, without MP_INST_APACHE2 I
> think... so does
; To use Apache::DBI do I need the old mod_perl 1 also installed running
>> some
>> kind of "dual mode"? Or is that not even an option since I'm running
>> Apache2. I'm learning quick so if this is covered someplace just give
>> me a
>> quick p
t not even an option since I'm running
>Apache2. I'm learning quick so if this is covered someplace just give me a
>quick pointer.
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
A
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Douglas Younger wrote:
> Hello,
>Has anyone written a proxy handler in 2.0 similar to example 7-12 of the
> O`Reilly book? I've tried converting it without much luck. I don't need the
> add-blocker stuff, just a generic proxy handle that I can add some
> additional lin
Hello,
Has anyone written a proxy handler in 2.0 similar to example 7-12 of the
O`Reilly book? I've tried converting it without much luck. I don't need the
add-blocker stuff, just a generic proxy handle that I can add some
additional lines to parse the output.
I've had some problems with Ap
> also static ressources like gif in server B documents could be retrieved
> from server A only with an alias not proxied to server B
>
>
> pascal
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Douglas Younger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMA
- Original Message -
From: "pascal barbedor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Douglas Younger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: How do I determine end of request? (mod_perl 2.0)
> hi
>
> you could maybe set the Proxy
Hello,
I'm fairly new to using mod_perl. I've been able to find lots of
resources dealing with mod_perl 1.x, but the documentation for 2.0 is
rather sparse.
I'm pretty sure what I need to do can only be handled by Apache 2.0 & thus
I'm forced to use mod_perl 2.0...
It looks like Apache 2.0(.35) is 'gold', so when can we expect a 'gold'
version of mod_perl 2.0 so we can actually make apache 2 fun? ;p
Jon Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
> From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jeff Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Mod Perl Devel List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mod perl mailing list"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wed
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 13:00, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jeff Stuart wrote:
> > Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
> > with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
>
> Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll tell you the status of
&g
c: "Mod Perl Devel List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mod perl mailing list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Status of mod_perl 2.0
> Jeff Stuart wrote:
> > Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it worki
Jeff Stuart wrote:
> Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
> with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
Tell me what's the status of apache 2.0 and I'll tell you the status of
mod_perl 2.0 :)
But seriously mod_perl 2.0 will be ready about the time
Question? What is the status of mod_perl 2.0? Also, is it working
with/playing with Apache 2.0 at all?
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal:
> >
> > - source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD.
> > The project that you suggest should be able t
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:31:11PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> This all sounds cool. I have a few concerns with this proposal:
>
> - source documents living under modperl cvs are to be written in POD.
> The project that you suggest should be able to accept this and other
> formats as a source
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl
> > >
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:45:43AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl
> > > > to buils a knowledge base" both to demonstrat
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > [Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people
> > contribute the better the outcome :)]
>
> Not at all, I just noticed that others seem to have replied direct
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > Just some pseudo-random ideation boiling down to "let's use mod_perl
> > > to buils a knowledge base" both to demonstrate it's power and to serve
> > > the community.
> >
> > I like the idea!
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:16:26PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people
> contribute the better the outcome :)]
Not at all, I just noticed that others seem to have replied directly and
followed suit.
>
> Something like this: http:
[Barrie, I hope you don't mind that I put it on the list, the more people
contribute the better the outcome :)]
> Hi Stas, sorry it took so long to get back to this :-/.
it's not late al all, really ;0) we have years to come to work on this
project.
> Some minor feedback. I could see an additi
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 08:12:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > This is a proposal for the mod_perl 2.0 documentation project.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> > + each project will have its pumpkin which will make sure that all
> > ch
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
