[newbie] procmail stopped working

2004-10-22 Thread Russell W. Behne
I had tried to install a groupware program tthat only succeded in screwing up my mail system completly. I removed it, did an rpm -e postscript, then re-installed postscript and got it working again, but for some unknown reason I just can't get procmail working again. Can someone

Re: [newbie] procmail stopped working

2004-10-22 Thread Derek Jennings
On Friday 22 October 2004 07:32, Russell W. Behne wrote: I had tried to install a groupware program tthat only succeded in screwing up my mail system completly. I removed it, did an rpm -e postscript, then re-installed postscript and got it working again, but for some unknown reason I just

Re: [newbie] procmail stopped working

2004-10-22 Thread Russell W. Behne
Today at 11:51, Derek Jennings wrote: On Friday 22 October 2004 07:32, Russell W. Behne wrote: I had tried to install a groupware program that only succeeded in screwing up my mail system completely. I removed it, did an rpm -e postscript, then re-installed postscript and got it working

Re: [newbie] procmail stopped working

2004-10-22 Thread Derek Jennings
On Friday 22 October 2004 19:11, Russell W. Behne wrote: Ok, sorry. I thought I had explained precisely what the problem is. Let me try again this way: 1. everything was working fine for the past 7 years. 2. I installed the groupware program from the control panel using `configure

[newbie] procmail recipe!

2004-03-03 Thread Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
I need a recipe to remove an attach from a plain HTML message I receive and forward it to a specif folder. I need this attach's for my PDA. They have a specific extension! I've googled around, searched for many sites on procmail and nothing good so far. any help? I need to keep the

RE: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless.

2003-10-20 Thread Kaminsky Moshe
-Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless. What I would really like would be a procmail recipe

Re: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless.

2003-10-16 Thread robin
Kaminsky Moshe wrote: -Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless. Kaminsky Moshe wrote: AFAIK, Netscape

Re: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless.

2003-10-14 Thread robin
Kaminsky Moshe wrote: AFAIK, Netscape (and maybe also Kmail) do not work with procmail. Netscape is not, strictly speaking, a MUA, but a whole mail system in one program: It delivers the mail to the local machine, and does all the redistribution and filtering by itself (I think), basically

RE: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless.

2003-10-14 Thread Kaminsky Moshe
-Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless. Kaminsky Moshe wrote: AFAIK, Netscape (and maybe also

[newbie] Procmail mangling my email headers, rendering Netscape Mail/Kmail useless.

2003-10-11 Thread Mark
Help! I just don't understand what is going on with my mail system. Let me explain. I have two users on my mail server, who access mail remotely, via IMAP I have been reconfiguring my mail lately, to begin incorporating filtering and virus detection. First I need to get the

[newbie] Procmail error msg HELP!

2003-10-10 Thread Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
Hi, there! For some periods, not always, I do get this kind of msg below... And I DO lose some important mails on that! ;-( How cain I fix that! Using ,mdk9.1 + postfix + procmail + kmail (spamassassim somwhere in between!) TIA! Ricardo Castanho =

[newbie] Procmail

2003-09-20 Thread HaywireMac
I would just like to post these links, as they are, combined with the input I received on this page, what finally got me to the point where I finally kind of sort of understand how Procmail works: http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ http://mirror.ncsa.uiuc.edu/procmail-faq/jimd.html

Re: [newbie] Procmail

2003-09-20 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 22:09, HaywireMac wrote: I would just like to post these links, as they are, combined with the input I received on this page, what finally got me to the point where I finally kind of sort of understand how Procmail works: http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/

Re: [newbie] Procmail

2003-09-20 Thread HaywireMac
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:18:12 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Maybe they're using a procmail filter on ya mate... yer s predictable... ;-) -- HaywireMac Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org ++ Mandrake HowTo's

Re: [newbie] Procmail

2003-09-20 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 20 Sep 2003 3:01 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 23:39, Anne Wilson wrote: On Saturday 20 Sep 2003 1:09 pm, HaywireMac wrote: I would just like to post these links, as they are, combined with the input I received on this page, what finally got me to the point

Re: [newbie] Procmail / twiki

2003-09-20 Thread Eric Huff
I would just like to post these links, as they are, combined with the input I received on this page, what finally got me to the point where I finally kind of sort of understand how Procmail works: http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-05 Thread robin
HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:43:03 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Why not /dev/null? Have you actually read through the entire RC file yet? bows head in em-bare-ass-ment Funnily enough, this is one of the first messages I received since a typo in my

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:12, HaywireMac wrote: Why not /dev/null? Have you actually read through the entire RC file yet? The idea would be to collect the crap, inspect the crap, then delete the crap... What if something came through that WASN'T a bug and WAS important? Uh - why not just

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 09:15 pm, HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 07:35:42 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Look - it's dependent on your need and requirement. What I want to do is implement that wunderbar procmail recipe you linked us to, and test it out,

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:43:03 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Why not /dev/null? Have you actually read through the entire RC file yet? bows head in em-bare-ass-ment The idea would be to collect the crap, inspect the crap, then delete the crap... I generally don't want to

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:49:39 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: This doesn't sound too hard. To a software test engineer maybe... g 1. Run Fetchmail as root So, if I were to follow Stephen's advice and use cron instead of inetd, I could just su root and crontab -e to create an

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 08:06 am, HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:49:39 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: This doesn't sound too hard. To a software test engineer maybe... g Hey, those who can't do, test. ;-} My personal skillset consists, modestly, of being

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:01:05 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: On Wednesday 03 September 2003 08:06 am, HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:49:39 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: 1. Run Fetchmail as root So, if I were to follow Stephen's advice and

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Derek Jennings
On Wednesday 03 Sep 2003 4:28 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote: On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:45 am, HaywireMac wrote: IIRC, Fetchmail can pass mail through Procmail like a filter, like so:? postconnect procmail? IIRC, I read this, but am not doing it myself. I would have to research to

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:25:42 +0100 Derek Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: If you install the fetchmail-daemon RPM then fetchmail will automatically start as a root service using /etc/fetcmailrc as its config file. BTW: I may have mentioned this before, but there is a writeup on my

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:28:13 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:45 am, HaywireMac wrote: IIRC, Fetchmail can pass mail through Procmail like a filter, like so:? postconnect procmail? IIRC, I read this, but am not doing it myself. I

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 11:37 am, Derek Jennings wrote: On Wednesday 03 Sep 2003 4:28 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote: On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:45 am, HaywireMac wrote: IIRC, Fetchmail can pass mail through Procmail like a filter, like so:? postconnect procmail?

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:02:15 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: If he really wants to try to do that, I can try to find where that was again. Nah, I'm gonna stick with the info you guys have provided for now, keep it simple, right? Thanks for all the help and explanations, I'm

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 12:00 pm, HaywireMac wrote: ...snip How is that accomplished? That would be a procmail recipe, I assume, no? Yes, something like this: :0H * ^List-Owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/spool/mail/user In the above recipe, it checks headers for the List-Owner

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 02:09 pm, HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:51:49 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: I don't think that it would be too hard. I could do a DNS query for an MX record and if you don't have one, simply deny the connect. If you are running a

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-03 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 22:06, HaywireMac wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:49:39 -0400 Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: This doesn't sound too hard. To a software test engineer maybe... g Ok...step by step. 1.) Download the nkvir-rc and put it in your /etc/ directory 2.) Edit the

[newbie] procmail default to inbox

2003-09-02 Thread Todd Slater
My system mailbox is /var/spool/mail/todd; any mail that doesn't get filtered according to my procmail recipes stays there. How could I make those messages that fall through the filters go to my inbox folder? Todd Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [newbie] procmail default to inbox

2003-09-02 Thread Derek Jennings
On Tuesday 02 Sep 2003 1:45 pm, Todd Slater wrote: My system mailbox is /var/spool/mail/todd; any mail that doesn't get filtered according to my procmail recipes stays there. How could I make those messages that fall through the filters go to my inbox folder? Todd In your procmailrc

Re: [newbie] procmail default to inbox

2003-09-02 Thread Paul
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:45, Todd Slater wrote: Use this directive DEFAULT=$HOME/path/yourInbox to set the default to your inbox. My system mailbox is /var/spool/mail/todd; any mail that doesn't get filtered according to my procmail recipes stays there. How could I make those messages that

Re: [newbie] procmail default to inbox

2003-09-02 Thread rikona
Hello Todd, Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 5:45:56 AM, you wrote: TS My system mailbox is /var/spool/mail/todd; any mail that doesn't get TS filtered according to my procmail recipes stays there. How could I make TS those messages that fall through the filters go to my inbox folder? Try the

Re: [newbie] procmail default to inbox

2003-09-02 Thread HaywireMac
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:04:02 +0100 Derek Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: In your procmailrc DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ (for example) This would be in addition to the: MAILDIR=/var/spool/mail ? -- HaywireMac Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: nodex.sytes.net

[newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread HaywireMac
Most of the guides and tutorials I see use ~/.procmalrc as an example, for use with Fetchmail. Now, I would like my machine to run Fetchmail as a system service, then have Procmail twiddle with the mail once it's been delivered to the appropriate maildirs, ie. /var/spool/mail/[username]. Am I

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 03:10 pm, HaywireMac wrote: Most of the guides and tutorials I see use ~/.procmalrc as an example, for use with Fetchmail. Now, I would like my machine to run Fetchmail as a system service, then have Procmail twiddle with the mail once it's been delivered to the

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread Mark
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, HaywireMac wrote: Most of the guides and tutorials I see use ~/.procmalrc as an example, for use with Fetchmail. Now, I would like my machine to run Fetchmail as a system service, then have Procmail twiddle with the mail once it's been delivered to the appropriate

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 07:35:42 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Look - it's dependent on your need and requirement. What I want to do is implement that wunderbar procmail recipe you linked us to, and test it out, eventually I would like to have a mail server up and running so that

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, HaywireMac wrote: What I want to do is implement that wunderbar procmail recipe you linked us to, and test it out, eventually I would like to have a mail server up and running so that it: 1. Retrieves the mail from the ISP (fetchmail, precalls mailfilter as 1st

Re: [newbie] Procmail and Fetchmail as system services

2003-09-02 Thread HaywireMac
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:53:52 +1000 Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: /etc/procmailrc calls the /etc/nkvir-rc from the INCLUDERC= file - so you have to look through the nkvir-rc and make sure you create a /var/spool/mail/virus/ directory - other than that, it's quite cool... Why not

[newbie] procmail default move to inbox

2003-08-16 Thread Todd Slater
I just set up procmail not long ago and I have my spam, lists, and bozos rc files set up. How do I make it so that mails not matching anything in those goes to the inbox? Right now, everything stays in the spool. Todd -- Name that tune #4: I said, There is no justice! as they led me out the

[newbie] procmail and new mail notification

2003-08-03 Thread Todd Slater
I've decided to use Mutt full-time for my mail reader. Moving from Sylpheed-Claws, my mail is in MH format; I've installed nmh, set up ~/.procmailrc and added some recipes in ~/.procmail/rc.*. Now, when most of my mail gets delivered to a folder inside ~/Mail and only a stray message stays in

Re: [newbie] Procmail Recipes

2003-03-16 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hi. On Sun 2003-03-16 at 00:03:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 15 March 2003 10:53 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: Hey y'all - anyone remember that I posed a PROCMAILRC a while ago - well, as y'all know, all my mail went the way of the wind, and if anyone can blast me a copy of it

Re: [newbie] Procmail Recipes

2003-03-16 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 00:47, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: Hi. On Sun 2003-03-16 at 00:03:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 15 March 2003 10:53 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: Hey y'all - anyone remember that I posed a PROCMAILRC a while ago - well, as y'all know, all my mail went the

Re: [newbie] Procmail Recipes

2003-03-16 Thread David E. Fox
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=procmailrc PATH=/bin:/usr/bin Hmm. Once I tried procmail and lost a lot of mails as well :(. If you don't set the .procmailrc correctly it can be problematic. # It is reliably reported that this single test may kill

Re: [newbie] Procmail Recipes

2003-03-16 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 08:46, David E. Fox wrote: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=procmailrc PATH=/bin:/usr/bin Hmm. Once I tried procmail and lost a lot of mails as well :(. If you don't set the .procmailrc correctly it can be problematic.

[newbie] Procmail Recipes

2003-03-15 Thread Stephen Kuhn
Hey y'all - anyone remember that I posed a PROCMAILRC a while ago - well, as y'all know, all my mail went the way of the wind, and if anyone can blast me a copy of it back - cuz I'm hustling to get my system back to specREALLY APPRECIATE! -- Sun Mar 16 08:50:00 EST 2003 08:50:00 up 1 day,

[newbie] procmail recipe

2001-11-17 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Arthur, In your email of 10/31/2001 to the list you attached a procmail recipe to your email. Could you please email it to me. Thanks in advance. B.R. Stephen Liu Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:38:06 -0500 (EST) From: Arthur H. Johnson II [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[newbie] Procmail question: timed checks?

2001-11-10 Thread Paul
Hi everyone, Is there a way to make procmail do certain rule-checks on certain times? I set it up to forward specific things to my work mail address, but it does not need to do that in the weekend. Wat I can think of is 2 INCLUDERC files and a cronjob that sets up one or the other. One empty

[newbie] Procmail recipes drive me nuts

2001-10-29 Thread Paul
Hi all, I am fighting with procmail, and am on the wrong end of the battle. What the . is wrong with these recipes. They don't work. Set up of the environment: DEFAULT=$HOME/sylmail/inbox/. MAILDIR=$HOME/sylmail/ LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail.log This one is supposed to catch all newbie mail

Re: [newbie] Procmail recipes drive me nuts

2001-10-29 Thread Paul
In reply to Paul's words, written Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:01:14 -0500 What the . is wrong with these recipes. They don't work. Okay peeps, forget this one. I am dumb. Solved. Paul -- If you are sure you understand everything that is going on, you are hopelessly confused. -Walter Mondale

Re: [newbie] Procmail recipes drive me nuts

2001-10-29 Thread Arthur H. Johnson II
Here is my recipe in case you want it. On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Paul wrote: Hi all, I am fighting with procmail, and am on the wrong end of the battle. What the . is wrong with these recipes. They don't work. Set up of the environment: DEFAULT=$HOME/sylmail/inbox/.

[newbie] Procmail

2001-07-10 Thread Tim Holmes
I just noticed that procmail on my workstations has died. Suddenly, and unexpectedly. I was looking at mail in my in box this morning and noticed that it should have been in another folder. So I check the procmail.log, and the last time it was edited was on June 29th. Two weeks ago or so. I

[newbie] Procmail+.forward

2000-09-12 Thread Antti Linno
Lo. Yesterday I checked if procmail will execute a script of mine, and I wrote .forward file, in which is line "|exec /usr/bin/procmail #user@host". First my mail agent said that no sendmail is installed. Ok, I installed it. Then for check I simply sent a mail to myself(removed .forward for

Re: [newbie] procmail sorting

2000-06-21 Thread Monte Milanuk
Well... That doesn't work quite as I had intended. The whole story is that the stock kmail that Mandrake 7.1 ships with has been doing strange things to my mail, and is generally buggy as heck. Plus a botched fetchmail run partways thru left me w/ several hundred duplicate messages. I finally

[newbie] procmail sorting

2000-06-17 Thread Monte Milanuk
Hello, all. I am trying to re-process my 'old' mail and get some procmail filters working, such as removing duplicates, etc. Does anyone know how to take an existing mailbox and 'feed' it back thru again? I tried 'cat inbox /var/spool/mail/monte' which just dumped everything back in the

Re: [newbie] procmail with postfix

1999-12-05 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Russ Pitman wrote: Hi, Has anyone had probs using procmail as a filter for postfix? I'm using procmail and postfix and they're working fine... aside from .forward and .procmailrc I didn't have to tweak any configuration files to get them to work together. (I did

Re: [newbie] procmail with postfix

1999-12-05 Thread Russ Pitman
Thanks Tom for the reply, in going over the permissions I found a dud file in my procmail dir which caused the hangup. Stupid of me not to go over -all- of the bits before yelling for help. I am impressed that you never had to edit the main.cf file. I am using the stock Mandrake 6.1 but

Re: [newbie] procmail with postfix

1999-12-05 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Russ Pitman wrote: Thanks Tom for the reply, in going over the permissions I found a dud file in my procmail dir which caused the hangup. Stupid of me not to go over -all- of the bits before yelling for help. Don't feel bad, it took me hours to get procmail working for

[newbie] Procmail

1999-11-01 Thread Vic
Hey all I was wondering if anyone had any procmail experience. I want to write a simple procmail 'recipe' that would bounce mail from certain addresses rather than just move them to /dev/null I would like to have a little text message ready on my ISP's server to be sent to anyones address who

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-11-01 Thread sphilp
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 01:44:35PM -0600, Vic wrote: Hey all I was wondering if anyone had any procmail experience. I want to write a simple procmail 'recipe' that would bounce mail from certain addresses rather than just move them to /dev/null You can't bounce mail from procmail. It's

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-11-01 Thread Vic
Thanx for the info, yeah they have procmail and have showed me how to make it dump spam into /dev/null, so I theorised that I could alter that variable to make it do other things as well like return a message that looked like a 'bounce' in hopes that it would at least make it to the relay of the

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-22 Thread Ribbo
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 10:38:28PM -0400, Thomas J. Hamman said: Indeed my .procmailrc was group writable... I did a chmod 644 and bam it works. Go figure. glad you made it... so which will you using then, postfix or sendmail? with or without .forward? more things to consider, you should

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-20 Thread Ribbo
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 08:50:38PM -0400, Thomas J. Hamman said: I gave that a try and it didn't work, all my mail was tossed into /var/spool/mail/hawk3 instead of being filtered by my .procmailrc. Did you alter any of sendmail's settings so that it would use .procmailrc without needing

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-19 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
what you put in your ~/.forward file? I've tried several variations, including this one given in procmail's manpage: "|exec /usr/bin/procmail" And it does not work. Try removing the exec so it looks like "|/usr/bin/procmail" just in case your sendmail is configured to deny exec. That

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-19 Thread John Richards
ms. Anyone have any ideas? If anyone has procmail working in Mandrake 6.1, what do you have in your forward? -JR - Original Message - From: Thomas J. Hamman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 11:18 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] Procmail Can somebody who us

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-19 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On 19-Oct-99 Michael R. Batchelor wrote: Try removing the exec so it looks like "|/usr/bin/procmail" just in case your sendmail is configured to deny exec. That should dump the message directly into procmail's standard input. Of course, you need to verify that procmail is actually

[newbie] Procmail

1999-10-18 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
Could somebody please point me to some documentation for setting up procmail to filter E-mail? The man pages aren't very helpful to someone completely new to filtering with procmail, and I've been following the Procmail Quickstart guide at http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ but

Re: [newbie] Procmail

1999-10-18 Thread Civileme
"Thomas J. Hamman" wrote: Could somebody please point me to some documentation for setting up procmail to filter E-mail? The man pages aren't very helpful to someone completely new to filtering with procmail, and I've been following the Procmail Quickstart guide at

Re: [newbie] Procmail Woes

1999-10-03 Thread Ribbo
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:28:54PM -0400, Jim Howarth said: I am presently attempting to setup procmail and its not sending my messages to the appropriate place...I have followed the instructions in the FAQ by the letter and yet it isn't processing the mail properly. I'm pretty sure that

[newbie] procmail

1999-09-30 Thread James Stewart
I'm using procmail as my mta in .fetchmailrc as I had various problems with sendmail. I was wondering if anyone could tell me the correct syntax to have procmail pass a message into a particular mailbox rather than forwarding it to a user? currently, to forward to a user, I'd use: "procmail -t

[newbie] Procmail Woes

1999-09-27 Thread Jim Howarth
I am presently attempting to setup procmail and its not sending my messages to the appropriate place...I have followed the instructions in the FAQ by the letter and yet it isn't processing the mail properly. I'm pretty sure that the problem is in the .forward file. Attached are both my