On Saturday 30 October 2004 09:07 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
You guys with gmail addresses are a pain in the neck ;-). I know you
cannot change the reply-to setting, so I only blame you for using the
system, not setting it up properly. This is the third time in the last
twenty-four hours I have
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:57, Aron Smith wrote:
On Saturday 30 October 2004 09:07 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
You guys with gmail addresses are a pain in the neck ;-). I know you
cannot change the reply-to setting, so I only blame you for using the
system, not setting it up properly. This is the
On Saturday 30 October 2004 01:51 pm, shaz wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:57, Aron Smith wrote:
On Saturday 30 October 2004 09:07 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
You guys with gmail addresses are a pain in the neck ;-). I know you
cannot change the reply-to setting, so I only blame you for using
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:51:41 +1300
shaz disseminated the following:
1Gb mail space
Wow. My only question is: what's wrong with the dozens of GB of space on one's
HD?
--
JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
14:51:54 up 87 days, 14:42, 6 users, load average: 0.01, 0.01, 0.00
1Gb mail space
Wow. My only question is: what's wrong with the dozens of GB of space on one's
HD?
JoeHill,
In my case, I have an old computer without dozens of GB on the HD. On
the other hand, my ISP does not allow me to check my e-mail when the
Internet connection is established
On Saturday 30 October 2004 02:57 pm, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:51:41 +1300
shaz disseminated the following:
1Gb mail space
Wow. My only question is: what's wrong with the dozens of GB of space on
one's HD?
It's accessible from any Internet enabled computer
--
/g
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:58:40 -0400
Greg Meyer disseminated the following:
Wow. My only question is: what's wrong with the dozens of GB of space on
one's HD?
It's accessible from any Internet enabled computer
So is my computer, if I so wish. POP, IMAP, whatever. This whole 'give me
On Saturday 30 October 2004 02:21 pm, JoeHill wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:58:40 -0400
Greg Meyer disseminated the following:
Wow. My only question is: what's wrong with the dozens of GB of space
on one's HD?
It's accessible from any Internet enabled computer
So is my computer, if
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 09:03, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:58, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Today 06:42:36
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
--
stephen kuhn
Gee, it was so
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 03:34, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
I upgraded my 10.0 laptop: no complaints!
My desktop though, is one hell of a mess. Xorg won't play nice with my 2.4
kernel and kyros graphic cardso I stuck in an old geforce 2 but
that's messy too (using the generic drivers).
I'll
On Thursday 30 September 2004 19:03, Stephen Kühn wrote:
You're using XOrg on 10.0?
No, upgraded 10.0 to 10.1.
Got it running by removing the old XF86Config-4 and letting XFdrake do the
work...downer: How do I get my wacom tablet to work using
Xorg?
Just copying the lines
On Thursday 30 September 2004 12:03, Stephen Kühn wrote:
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 03:34, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
I upgraded my 10.0 laptop: no complaints!
My desktop though, is one hell of a mess. Xorg won't play nice with
my 2.4 kernel and kyros graphic cardso I stuck in an old
geforce
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:58, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Today 06:42:36
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
--
stephen kuhn
Gee, it was so quiet over here I thought the list was
down ...own own ..own!
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 22:04, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2004 23:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
/dev/null or spam folder.
Not where I end up PUTTING IT, but where I GET it...der...
--
stephen kuhn
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 22:29, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
What's off-toping crud?
LX
Weaver's Mandrake Off-Topic List(since no one here ever does IRC)
--
stephen kuhn
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 10:13, et wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:13, Paul wrote:
Op Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:29:48 -0400 schreef Lyvim Xaphir:
What's off-toping crud?
An anagram for off-topic ngrud.
hey. I resemble that remark...
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ta, Ed (you damn silly
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Today 06:42:36
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
--
stephen kuhn
Gee, it was so quiet over here I thought the list was
down ...own own ..own!
Judging by the echo, this hall of fame is has just been
On Monday 27 September 2004 23:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
/dev/null or spam folder.
--
Regards;
Hoyt
Registered Linux User #363264
http://counter.li.org
Want to buy your Pack or
is 10.1 really that good?
--
yep
Maryse
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Op Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:29:48 -0400 schreef Lyvim Xaphir:
What's off-toping crud?
An anagram for off-topic ngrud.
--
American beer is like making love in a canoe.
It's f*cking close to water.
http://www.nlpagan.net/linux.htm
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 00:42, Stephen Kühn wrote:
Anyone know the address for re-addressing the off-toping crud?
What's off-toping crud?
LX
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 15:00, M.Schild wrote:
is 10.1 really that good?
--
yep
Maryse
OK, started downloading as of today:)
--
Good luck,
HarM
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:13, Paul wrote:
Op Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:29:48 -0400 schreef Lyvim Xaphir:
What's off-toping crud?
An anagram for off-topic ngrud.
hey. I resemble that remark...
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
--
linux counter #167806
Op zaterdag 27 december 2003 11:57, schreef Ronald J. Hall:
Hmm, I seem to have lost the instructions on how to subsribe to the off
topic list since I changed HD's and upgraded to v9.2 of Mandrake. I
searched the Maling List archives, but have you ever searched there for
off topic?
yes I did
On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:13 am, ronald wrote:
- yes I did :-) and came up with this
-
- http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-newbiem=104542996332678w=2
-
- is this the one Ronald?
-
- HTH ronald
Yes, I believe thats it - thanks!
Odd that, the screen where I searched for it at was
Op zaterdag 27 december 2003 12:32, schreef Ronald J. Hall:
Odd that, the screen where I searched for it at was nothing at all like the
BW screen your link pointed to - was that under Mailing list archives on
the Mandrake home page?
from a general mailinglist archive
On Saturday 27 December 2003 06:33 am, ronald wrote:
- from a general mailinglist archive
-
- http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
-
- ronald
Ah, thanks!
--
/\
On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 06:09, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 26 May 2003 1:26 am, Cody Harris wrote:
Ok ok, i know someone's going to yell at me, but, i want to print
multiple documents to a PDF to fax. The part people are going to
yell at me for it that i need to know how to do it in windows.
On Sunday 25 Aug 2002 2:56 am, you wrote:
Michael Adams wrote:
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:09, Anne Wilson wrote:
Fact 1: A quote exists Variety is the spice of life.
Fact 2: Some people get passionate about silly things.
Fact 3: You will not be able to stop bottom posters posting at the
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 25 Aug 2002 2:56 am, you wrote:
I found it hard to believe, but I left one usenet group because the flaming
got so bad - and it was mainly about this topic! Sad to say, the main
flamers were those who made extremely rude remarks about anyone who through
yea know, some things are too good to resist
start wisedumbAss remarks
On Saturday 24 August 2002 06:38 pm, you wrote:
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:09, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 22 Aug 2002 12:30 pm, you wrote:
I must apologise to everyone on this list.
a, don't bother and really
On Sunday 25 August 2002 03:46 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 25 Aug 2002 2:56 am, you wrote:
I found it hard to believe, but I left one usenet group because the
flaming got so bad - and it was mainly about this topic! Sad to say, the
main flamers were those who
On Thursday 22 Aug 2002 12:30 pm, you wrote:
I must apologise to everyone on this list. After i replied to a couple of
postings i realised i'd messed up! Posted at TOP not Bottom. Purely
unintentional and please forgive me. Any flame gracefully accepted at this
point. Regards [EMAIL
On Thursday 22 August 2002 07:30 am, you wrote:
I must apologise to everyone on this list. After i replied to a couple of
postings i realised i'd messed up! Posted at TOP not Bottom. Purely
unintentional and please forgive me. Any flame gracefully accepted at this
point. Regards [EMAIL
Marc wrote:
This is way off topic for this group but from what I have seen here I know that I
can trust what ever answer I get.
The question I have is will a new Athlon XP mobo fit in the same case and use
the same power supply as a old P3 mobo? I do realise that the power supply
Yup. Should work without any modifications, but add an extra cooling fan
inside the case. Should cost you less than $10.00 from a retailer.
Lanman
- Original Message -
From: Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 7:58 AM
Subject: [newbie] Off topic
8/11/02 7:26:46 AM, civileme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc wrote:
This is way off topic for this group but from what I have seen here I know that
I
can trust what ever answer I get.
The question I have is will a new Athlon XP mobo fit in the same case and
use
the same power supply as
On Sunday 11 August 2002 07:58 am, you wrote:
This is way off topic for this group but from what I have seen here I
know that I can trust what ever answer I get.
The question I have is will a new Athlon XP mobo fit in the same case
and use the same power supply as a old P3 mobo? I do
8/11/02 7:30:27 AM, et [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 11 August 2002 07:58 am, you wrote:
This is way off topic for this group but from what I have seen here I
know that I can trust what ever answer I get.
The question I have is will a new Athlon XP mobo fit in the same case
and
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 17:26, Mark Weaver wrote:
| -
| If at first you don't succeed do what your wife told you to do
| the first time!
yeah... what is it with men? ; )
I have to bite my tongue (daily I swear) so as
Well you know why Moses spent 40 years wandering through the desert?
Even back them men wouldnt stop and ask for directions.
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 04:33, you wrote:
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 17:26, Mark Weaver wrote:
|
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001 07:17:12 -0800
Grant Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Well you know why Moses spent 40 years wandering through the desert?
Even back them men wouldnt stop and ask for directions.
well...I'm speachless. I can't believe some of
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:18:12 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Some people say a lot of Linux people are leaving Linux for OS X. Have
you heard anything about that? I use OS X in my daily work, and it is
nice, but I am also interested in Linux for
Well, like I said it was just one thing I heard in one report. I don't
know or even think it is true, if for no other reason than sheer cost!
doug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wednesday, December 26, 2001):
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:18:12 +0900
Doug Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words
On Monday 24 December 2001 11:13 am, you wrote:
Now that I found a nice OS and a nice group of people to talk about
technical issues in Mandrake Linux I am wondering - how is the market
share of Linux coming along? Growing? Is OS X having good/bad effects on
Linux?
doug
Well, it took a
On Monday 24 December 2001 12:47, you wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2001 11:13 am, you wrote:
Now that I found a nice OS and a nice group of people to talk about
technical issues in Mandrake Linux I am wondering - how is the market
share of Linux coming along? Growing? Is OS X having
Some people say a lot of Linux people are leaving Linux for OS X. Have
you heard anything about that? I use OS X in my daily work, and it is
nice, but I am also interested in Linux for (1) less dependency on one
company (Apple) and (2) cost (you can have lots of machines relatively
inexpensively)
just to keep this up... (with tongue firmly implanted in right cheek) and
when did the almighty leave you in charge to decide what is or is NOT
"political correctness" (ands heck ain't you from an island name Ireland,
if-n you-n a Celt? and by the way do you all know what the phrase (excuse
no kidding.
get a life people.
or get a web site and post you venting there.
all the whining is far more offensive than the original comment.
Adrian Smith
'de telepone dude
Telecom Dept.
x 7042
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay needs a Guinness [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12:10:43 PM 3/7/01
In this day of
On Wednesday 07 March 2001 01:10 pm, Jay needs a Guinness wrote:
In this day of political correctness we always have to be wary of what
and how we say it. I, for one, am NOT politically correct. I refuse to
be offended by what anybody says on a mailing list and my suggestion is,
if you are
my free advice: purchase everything seperately. when i look at these high
end systems for 3000 and such, i really think you can make a system just as
good or better piece by piece.
of course, if you are poor folk like me, they you don't have much choice to
go with an integrated cheap system.
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 11:24 am, Kuis A. Sanes wrote:
Hi guys,;)
I am considering buying a new pc, my search have begun with
pricing on the top of the list.
http://www.thedukeofurl.org/reviews.shtml there's plenty of other
linux orientated hardware sites including
]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Off topic, I but need some advice guys! ;)
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 11:24 am, Kuis A. Sanes wrote:
Hi guys,;)
I am considering buying a new pc, my search have begun with
pricing on the top of the list.
http://www.thedukeofurl.org/reviews.shtml there's
ok, I'm giving out free advice. being as i own a $400 comcrap, i mean compaq
(what is up with corporations who can't spell? i remember when i was spelled compack)
but i agree avoid the integrated stuff. my sound / video / motherboard are all one.
is one dies, they all die.
my free
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 12:31 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Yeah, I'm replyin to my own post, but as others have responded to
this thread, buildin your own is really the only way to get quality
compatible hardware now-a-days, ready mades have never been a good
choice
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Off topic, I but need some advice guys! ;)
On Wednesday 07 February 2001 11:24 am, Kuis A. Sanes wrote:
Hi guys,;)
I am considering buying a new pc, my search have begun with
pricing
I'm a Linux newbie but I've been building and selling custom PCs for
years. I'd agree on building your own. My advice is to go to the AMD
board and get one of the AMD-recommended MOBOs for an Athlon CPU. Also,
stay away from the all-in-one boards. Better to have plug in sound,
MODEM,
I'd like to get mysql up and running...so I can use it for
a webring DB...can someone suggest a real good tutorial
on getting it running...and setup
preferably, step by step...and really not hard.?
If it were me I'd run out and buy one of the two O'Reilly Press books on MySQL,
most
The manual that comes with ever installation of MySQL is probably the best
documentation that I've ever seen for this application.
--
Mark
** =/\= No Penguins were harmed | ICQ#27816299
** _||_ in the making of
The manual that comes with ever installation of MySQL is probably the best
documentation that I've ever seen for this application.
Mark, are you referring to "info MySQL" here?
Cheers --- Larry
I think I've seen some over at http://www.cgi-resources.com
(damn... startin' to feel like an ad for those guys)
-- jon
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, KompuKit wrote:
Can someone tell me where I can get an APP or cgi-script
of some sort..to HOST a WEBRING...on my server?
FREE, of course
Try http://hotscripts.com
KompuKit wrote:
Can someone tell me where I can get an APP or cgi-script
of some sort..to HOST a WEBRING...on my server?
FREE, of course
--
Registered Linux User:167369
=KompuKit=
Kit Goins
:~ Never in five years have I had a mail lost this long..the US
:~postal service is faster than E-mail? I did not want to send the whole
:~reject to the list, but in the header was addresses of daemon in the
:~UK...the MDK machine is in the UK? I thought France.
Nope. our mail server is in
basculesheesh, I just reread your orininal message and
can't for the life of me figure out how I wrote that response
to it. Sorry, I guess I was preoccupied or asleep or
something, duh!! Yeah, EOT is good. :-)
Alan
bascule wrote:
thats the point alan, netscape clearly has an option to
thats the point alan, netscape clearly has an option to 'when deleting a
message locally, remove it from the server' in the mail servereditpop
preferences yet this doesn't appear to work for me, thats all. a new
client shouldonly be downloading a few messages because thats all i keep
locally ,
In most cases ISP's have a space limit set for users...I know for my hosting
company it is 50MB...my site files and such take up 40 or so MB leaving me
with 10MB for mail (for which I have 6 or 7 POP3 boxes setup)...since you
said that you had thousands and thousands of messages I am kind of
On Tue, 09 May 2000, you wrote:
i have 'leave messages on server' option on preferences ticked with
'delete messages on server if deleted locally' selected also (this is
not an option if the former is not checked,
however messages on my isp server are not being deleted, ifound out when
it appears that i am lucky, my isp tells me that i have no limit so i
guess won't be causing any bounce backs, still a strange phenomenon
though, i leave messages on the server as a backup for the number of
times i have to reinstall (i'm lazy i know) but having joined a few
lists it's getting a
Hi Oder,
It is alt.os.linux mandrake. I have it on the news server that my ISP
subscribes to. Note the space between linux and mandrake. Sometimes those
news servers can be finicky. Maybe that's why you aren't finding it. Did
you try running a search at deja.com?
Thanks,
Kathleen
Oder Santos schrieb:
I don't know if this is a off topic question but I have no idea where can I
find alt.os.linuxmandrake in a public news server. Does anyone have any
information? Thanks in advance. Oder.
there's a newsgroup alt.os.linux.mandrake
jogger
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Oder Santos wrote:
I don't know if this is a off topic question but I have no idea where can I
find alt.os.linuxmandrake in a public news server. Does anyone have any
information? Thanks in advance. Oder.
Oder,
try alt.os.linux.mandrake
terry
--
Title: RE: [newbie] Off Topic but good
Cheers Group,
Someone sent me this question and it has me clueless. Cna anyone provide any insight on a solution that would work for both Linux and Winblows?
Thanks,
Phil Lamey
Hey Phil. I've got a Perl question for you. Do you know how to send
Try the Perl mailing lists and newsgroups, if you don't find an answer
here. One location which supports several mailing lists is at
http://www.activestate.com
That isn't Perl for Unix or Linux, and instead for win32, but
you might get an answer there. Otherwise, you'll need to search
the
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, you wrote:
This is a stretch. But...
Speaking of SCO. Is it possible for Linux to read SCO disks? I have dBase IV
for SCO, (really, it is a licensed copy), and would like to try to install on
Linux, but I can't mount the floppy.
I get an error saying wrong filesystem,
You may need to recompile your kernel, or at least compile a module for
the SCO filesystem (System V?). Also, your kernel will need to support
iBCS (Intel Binary Compatibility Standard); I don't know if Mandrake does
this by default.
-Matt Stegman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 [EMAIL
Steve
That makes a ton of sense. Anything to help a newbie get better aquainted
with a new OS.
As a side point, you mention SuSE, and Caldera... I have L-M 6.0 installed and
I have some old distro's of those and a few other's. Now L-M supports RPM's
and other _package_ installs. Is it worth
Jaguar wrote:
Steve
That makes a ton of sense. Anything to help a newbie get better aquainted
with a new OS.
As a side point, you mention SuSE, and Caldera... I have L-M 6.0 installed and
I have some old distro's of those and a few other's. Now L-M supports RPM's
and other _package_
Joachim Holst wrote:
Hi !
I've just joined this list, and I wonder why the h?ck is there so much
debate about getting EI to run on a Linux system ?? Isn't it better to get
Mozilla in working order giving us an alternativ to propriety software ??
Yes! It's of immensely more importance to
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, you wrote:
i hear the beast is buying up linux. remember i while ago, when aohell
supposedly merged with netscape, when aol was in with ms. this isn't
over yet. if all else fails. Follow The Money!
Um. . .buying up linux from who? since no one really owns linux that
On tor, 25 nov 1999, you wrote:
Joachim Holst wrote:
Hi !
I've just joined this list, and I wonder why the h?ck is there so much
debate about getting EI to run on a Linux system ?? Isn't it better to get
Mozilla in working order giving us an alternativ to propriety software ??
On tor, 25 nov 1999, you wrote:
i hear the beast is buying up linux. remember i while ago, when aohell
supposedly merged with netscape, when aol was in with ms. this isn't
over yet. if all else fails. Follow The Money!
my preferences: netscape over irritate-explorer
Joachim Holst wrote:
On tor, 25 nov 1999, you wrote:
Joachim Holst wrote:
Hi !
I've just joined this list, and I wonder why the h?ck is there so much
debate about getting EI to run on a Linux system ?? Isn't it better to get
Mozilla in working order giving us an alternativ
Ripcrd6 wrote:
Also, Joseph Gardener's name appears in a few places on the site.
Especialy if you use their Whois and check some of the major distros.
My $0.05 (inflation)
Brian
Brian,
And how in G_d's name did you seem to find my name ( which you mis-spelled by
the way ) to attempt to
Whoops. I am wrong. I apologize. It's John Nugent who has all those
domains registered. I take back all I said about you. But the guys
business is suspect since a whois or reverse lookup of domains w/ .linux
come up as invalid w/ NAI and all other services.
Brian
-Original
Ripcrd6 wrote:
Whoops. I am wrong. I apologize. It's John Nugent who has all those
domains registered. I take back all I said about you. But the guys
business is suspect since a whois or reverse lookup of domains w/ .linux
come up as invalid w/ NAI and all other services.
Brian
Off topic http://www.linuxnic.net
Spam? I guess a bit of shameless promotion -:)
Blame me directly at the above email if you are bent.
Cheers.
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, fred wrote:
Off topic http://www.linuxnic.net
Spam? I guess a bit of shameless promotion -:)
More than just that:
shameless promotion of an *illegal* product that *won't ever work*.
You can't just create a TLD all of your own and ask ISPs to list you as a
root
: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] (Off Topic)
Off topic http://www.linuxnic.net
Spam? I guess a bit of shameless promotion -:)
Blame me directly at the above email if you are bent.
Cheers.
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] (Off Topic)
Off topic http://www.linuxnic.net
Spam? I guess a bit of shameless promotion -:)
Blame me directly
fred
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] (Off Topic)
Off topic http://www.linuxnic.net
Spam? I guess a bit of shameless promotion -:)
Blame me directly at the above email if you are bent.
Cheers.
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, you wrote:
Also, you are in clear violation of the terms you agreed to by subscribing
to this mailing list.
So?? Why don't you guys just kick him off
John
John Aldrich wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, you wrote:
Also, you are in clear violation of the terms you agreed to by subscribing
to this mailing list.
So?? Why don't you guys just kick him off
John
Perhaps a friendly reminder is far better than a stab in the back, especially
More than just that:
shameless promotion of an *illegal* product that *won't ever work*.
You can't just create a TLD all of your own and ask ISPs to list you as a
root nameserver.
There's nothing that prevents me from doing the same for just the same
TLD, and where will that get us?
fred wrote:
More than just that:
shameless promotion of an *illegal* product that *won't ever work*.
You can't just create a TLD all of your own and ask ISPs to list you as a
root nameserver.
There's nothing that prevents me from doing the same for just the same
TLD, and where
From: Joseph S. Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps a friendly reminder is far better than a stab in the back,
especially
since it appears he was simply trying to help out fellow "tuxters"
No, it appears that he was attempting to hawk his ill-thought-out
service, while giving the appearance
is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of fred
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 12:28 PM
To: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] (Off Topic)
More than just
Fred, Please take your spam elsewhere. We dont need it here.
At 08:38 PM 9/15/99 -0700, you wrote:
http://www.linuxnic.net
I found some great names.
97 matches
Mail list logo
