KT HF, Norway
>
> Tel. +47 40203298
>
> Web: http://arketyper.no / Twitter: @arketyper_no
> <https://twitter.com/arketyper_no>
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org
>
>
, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD
>
> M +61 418 966 670
>
> Skype: heatherleslie
>
> Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard
>
> www.atomicainformatics.com
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-cl
standard
> and the archetype before further reviews.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
> *Dr Heather Leslie*
>
> MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD
>
> M +61 418 966 670
>
> Skype: heatherleslie
>
> Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels
t; there,
> which was my interpretation of what you called ANY.
>
>
Yes, if you don't constrain anything, then the underlying model rules. And
that's equivalent to saying ANY, that's why I insist on that :D
--
David Moner Cano
Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
tation problem, but a problem of using
a badly designed archetype/template. I always say in my courses that
archetypes provide a great flexibility and power, but you have to accept
the consequences of a bad (or incomplete) archetype design.
This interpretation is also coherent with AOM/ADL 2
ld want this?
>
> Pieter
>
> Op 4 jul. 2018 om 08:33 heeft David Moner dam...@gmail.com>> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Templates further constrain archetypes, that constrain the reference
> model. In both cases, if the ANY constraint is used, that means that
> anythi
y option. This is not
completely true in specialized archetypes, where you can expand the
definition and create new constraints, but that is a special case that is
not possible (as far as I know) at the template level.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Twitter: @davidmo
o electrónico junto a sus datos personales forman
>> parte de un fichero titularidad de VeraTech for Health SL (CIF B98309511)
>> cuya finalidad es la de mantener el contacto con usted. Conforme a La Ley
>> Orgánica 15/1999, usted puede ejercitar sus derechos de acceso,
>> rectificació
have prepared a white paper
summarizing the methodology. You can find it in
https://es.slideshare.net/damoca/archetype-modeling-language
We hope this contribution is useful for you and that it facilitates
archetype adoption.
--
David Moner Cano
Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Tw
ação do teor deste documento depende
> de autorização do emissor, sujeitando-se o infrator às sanções legais. Caso
> esta comunicação tenha sido recebida por engano, favor avisar
> imediatamente, respondendo esta mensagem.
>
> ___
> openEHR-clinical m
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
>> clinical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
>> ___
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
&g
hanged the receiver
will use its own archetype to validate the received data, and if it
includes the 'deg' unit it will just fail the validation. Breaking
revisions are not only about changing the archetype structure, but also
about generating a different set of possible instances.
--
Dav
ated solution is to just follow the
versioning rules that already exist.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acce
nales/hcdsns/areaRecursosSem/Rec_mod_clinico_arquetipos.htm
The list of subsets is described in this document (only in Spanish, the
subsets themselves are available for Spanish citizens only):
http://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/hcdsns/areaRecursosSem/FactoriaDocs/GUIADESUBCONJUNTOS_HCDSNS2.pdf
David
--
Davi
on 3*: Promote the new candidate archetype to the public trunk, run
> formal content reviews on it and plan to re-publish as v2
>
>
>
> Please, your thoughts?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
> *Dr Heather Leslie *MBBS FRACGP FACHI
> *Consulting Lead*, Ocean Informatics <htt
an ACTION linked to it. If the answer is
that in some cases we only need to record the OBSERVATION with a protocol,
then we are creating a division of all the universe of procedures, as
typically defined in terminologies such as SNOMED CT.
Thoughts?
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Informáti
on support systems. With this
approach, existing EHR data becomes available in a standardized and
interoperable format, thus opening a world of possibilities toward semantic
or concept-based reuse, query and communication of clinical data.
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Informática Biomédica - IBIME
he latter can occur when a doctor asks the patient for medication
> taken. I agree the real time record of the event can also occur.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Sent from my LG Mobile
>
> -- Original message--
>
> *From: *David Moner
>
> *Date: *Tue,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pablo.
>
>
> Sent from my LG Mobile
>
> ___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de In
hodologies and
analyzed them to find out their similarities and differences. We hope this
work can be of interest for you.
Best regards,
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Universidad
rsion_last_translated = <"2.0.1">
>
> >
> >
>
>
> However.. it's not clear who did the most recently translation, and who
> only did some old translation. How do we deal with representing what's a
> current picture of affairs
ffice +44 (0)1536 414994
> > > skype: ianmcnicoll
> > > email: ian at freshehr.com
> > > twitter: @ianmcnicoll
> > >
> > > Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics
> > > Director, openEHR Foundation
> > > Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> > &
but it still wouldn't be the one to use for scores.
>
> - thomas
>
> On 17/03/2015 10:09, David Moner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It might seem a very basic question, but I couldn't find an appropriate
> answer anywhere. Which is the best way to model a single Real number
o the REAL data type in ISO 21090
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia -
kshops by the middle of January. Keep an eye on the lists
> for
> > details.>>>> Looking forward to working with you all in 2015!>>>> Cheers,
> > Sam>>>> Dr Sam Heard>> Chairman, openEHR Foundation>>>>>>
> > _
"Intermountain model xyz avalable at ">
> time = <2014-10-12T12:44:00>
> method = <"IHCModelConverter v3.134.0.78">
> other_details = < >-- tagged values
> >
>
> thoughts on this?
>
> - thomas
>
> _
ownload/attachments/45645905/AOM_archetype_package.png?version=2&modificationDate=1412032298000&api=v2>.
> Note that it is currently spelt in international English, not US English
> ('license', which is only a verb in International English).
>
> - thomas
>
> On 13/11/2014
>
> ___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -
> http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthinters
;
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Institu
perience that many times
people don't like to be forced to do things in some way, even if it is
mandated by the specifications. So when all these changes come to the
tools, an education effort will also be needed.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBI
rg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office / fax +44(0)141 560 4657
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicoll
> ian at freshehr.com
>
> Clinical modelling consultant freshEHR
> Director openEHR Foundation
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
; ___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Institut
as their hash code. And in that case, changing to v0
should not mean any difference or additional problem.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
http:/
would require a deep analysis
and changes of the models, but that could be the idea.
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (
/EN13606trainingcourse.pdf
You are all welcome to participate in any of these activities.
Best regards,
David Moner
Secretary of the EN 13606 Association
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera
ends on
the previous one. The fact of representing clinical models in a different
format (if we see ADL just as a format for defining models) should not
change the essence of the problem as we saw in point 2.
See that I'm just trying to set out the limits of the problem to find a
general rule
the concept "derived work".
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
--
d by a committee that
> is the owner of the list of preferred terms/
>
>
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088
> gfrer at luna.nl
>
>
>
>
> On 14 jan. 2012, at 16:36, David Moner wrote:
>
> Local to organisations probably yes (I really don't know how languages ar
tes will provide local dialects.
> Archetype nodes are defined in a preferred English-UK language.
>
>
>
>
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088
> gfrer at luna.nl
>
>
>
>
> On 14 jan. 2012, at 15:46, Thomas Beale wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2012 13:20, David Moner wr
see
> how many 'incorrect' es-es you can find.
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-
e same as in English,
"constipation". But in Spain it means "to have a cold".
As Ian and Gerard have said, probably this is solved by using
terminologies, but it is an indication that local language codes are needed.
2012/1/13 Thomas Beale
> On 13/01/2012 07:13, David Moner w
nce anyone who does it will use implicitly his own
variant. If an Argentinian creates an archetype, he will use the es-ar
variant implicitly, since the pure "es" does not exist and he won't even be
aware that some words are local ones.
Seems that the problem is more tricky than we
differ from the parent language terms.
That's exactly my thinking. To work as much as possible with the root or
parent language and just include at localised languages the possible
changes or varying items. This differential approach seems quite useful to
me.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo
gt; other, with the objective of completing the tool chain with open source
> developments.
>
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
> LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
> Blog: http://informatica-medic
tierrez
> Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos <http://twitter.com/ppazos>
>
> ___
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime
> >>> nodes to the archetype, I need to change the ITEM_SINGLE to another
> >>> ITEM_STRUCTURE, but if the archetype is modeled with an ITEM_TREE, I
> >>> can add any nodes without changing the ITEM_STRUCTURE type. I think
> >>> this way is more simple to c
d to, at least, warn systems that use archetypes
that something has changed.
David
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022
mber is reset to 0.
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment w
ttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
> >
> >
> >
> > _______
> > openEHR-clinical mailing list
> > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clini
e) ?
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sam
>
>
>
> *From:* openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:
> openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *David Moner
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 September 2009 9:25 PM
> *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions
> *Cc:* For openE
is -
> http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/oecom/Archetypes+-+Copyright+and+Licensing
>
> - thomas beale
>
> David Moner wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> These days I have been thinking about the legal issues involving the use of
> existing archetypes. I have seen that openEHR archety
; attribute
of an archetype should be renamed to "license" to best fit the conditions of
usage of archetypes.
What's your opinion?
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Cam
nEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
>
--
David Moner Cano
Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME
Instituto ITACA
http://www.ibime.upv.es
Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV)
Camino de Vera
54 matches
Mail list logo
