It is unnecessary, but I think the comments were made in large. It's
kind of a tradition that the French make disparaging but light-hearted
remarks about Americans, and Americans do the same in regard to the
French. (The same can probably said in regard to the French and the
Brits.) My
In that last reply to this message, I meant to write, "I think the
comments were made in jest." I've gotta get control of my fingers. How
in the world did I type "large" instead of "jest?" I better have another
cup of coffee.
Paul
Peter Smith wrote:
Cyril wrote:
I am, however, saddened
Thanks everyone for the welcome!
Rob, thanks for the link. When the kids get back to school next week I will
try to get some of the ones that I took up on the web. So far I have only
shot with color film, I am going to check on getting a couple of rolls of BW
for the next tourny.
Artur, it
Is that your larjest blunder :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of PAUL STENQUIST
Sent: 12 April 2001 12:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Direct from Chasseur d'Images
In that last reply to this message, I meant to write, "I
So its not a successful business model to discount a first job, or to
say have a free sitting, and one free 10x8, but pay for any others you
want?
Funny how 99% of studios in the UK survive then?
Who said anything about 'Reversing a discount' anyway? What we said was
give them a discount off
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Peter Smith wrote:
That's your choice Tanya but I think use of the word "fairy" in your
business name may associate you too strongly with children's portraiture.
Why? Not all the fairies are Peter Pan's companions.
M.K.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Rebecka wrote:
Dan, I did use the same lens for all the shots. I was mainly using up a roll
that I had in the camera bag, fuji 400. The lens was the one that came with
the camera a 35mm-80mm with the 2X tele converter that I have. I know that I
should have used a faster film but I was
Okay.
I'm getting a refreshed understanding of filters
myself these days. But my problem lies in another
area -- film and optimum contrast.
Particularly, I like the general appearance of
Plux-X, but not the softness. How does one
compensate for that softness in either chemical choice
or
Hi Lasse,
I do not believe that my 135/2.8 is a "A" lens. I know this is going to show
my lack of knowledge but do the "A" lenses have a green "A" on them near
where the f stops are?
I havent shot to much yet with this lens I got home Saturday and there was a
note from the post office that it
"My rate is usually $XXX, but seeing as who you are, I'll give you a
discount of $XXX."
"Also, as Rob says, discounts can easily be removed especially when you get
busier and are doing more work."
1) we are not talking studio, and it wasn't mentioned in that context
2) the above quotes do not
A scroll of mail from John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 10
Apr 2001 21:03:29 -0500
Read it? y
America - a country which the French helped create, many long years
ago, and which became a bunch of obnoxious ingrates who had the gall
(gaul?) to produce better wine.
So pour me another splash
Well if its pedantic you want:
OK we are not explicitly talking studio - anything in life that you pay
for can have a discount applied under whatever regime you like.
'First job gets a discount' was just one suggestion, everyone knows that
discounts are discretionary, subject to change over
Bucky wrote:
Don't believe a word Bill says; we're all filthy rotten pigs up here in the
frozen wastelands.
Speak for yourself! I have a woman who does my laundry, so that makes
me a clean, freshly-scented pig. And if she ever reads this, I'll
probably be back to doing my own laundry.
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
By the way, Tanya, I use ME Supers for my 35mm photography.
How dare you say that I ain't a professional because of that
grin.
For several years I used one camera (medium format) with one
lens. Equipment is an amateur buggy-boo, to a pro a camera is
just a tool.
It just sounded like everyone was trying to suggest to Tanya different
methods she can use to keep lowballing her prices instead of encouraging her
to charge what she's worth and doing so with a clear conscience.
Norm
Rob Brigham wrote:
Well if its pedantic you want:
OK we are not explicitly
The Nikon HN-2 works wonderfully. If you really want, just black out the
white Nikon writing and no one will ever know it's not Pentax...well maybe.
Darren S.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 10, 2001 5:11 AM
An article presented by one member subtlety demonstrating a not uncommon
attitude of many French toward Americans generally pissed me off. As I said
to one member who brought this up to me personally:
"I'm sorry, ___. I should have held my tongue [regarding the defamatory
article]."
The
It's always good to do that so one can know how to properly break them G.
Norm
Bob Blakely wrote:
snip Just getting the rules straight.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
The NH-3 will be a better choice.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
Darren Tara Sutherland wrote:
The Nikon HN-2 works wonderfully. If you really want, just black out the
white Nikon writing and no one
What do you mean by softness? What camera and film format are you
using? What developer at what dilution? What time/temp/agitation
are you using. At what EV are you rating the film.
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I'm getting a refreshed understanding of filters
myself these days. But my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa³ / wrote:
Lasse, our uniforms are the white ones. I never thought about them
influencing the metering. Although in these shots from Saturday I wasnt that
close, but that is a good thought to keep in mind. I didnt use the Achiever
260 this time because the lens
The wildlife won't be fooled. (except maybe Ostriches)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pl Jensen
Sent: 12 April 2001 11:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blind or hide experience
Are there anyone with experience with the small
maybe a little late but try sending an email through:
http://www.sekonic.com/ask.html
I requested a manual on an older one via pdf and was sent one w/in a couple
of days.
Delano
From: Michael Nosal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:12:59 -0400
To:
Norm,
What she is worth is what the customers are willing to pay for her work, not
what she (or we, for that matter) think that she is worth.
There are lots of child photography studios with web sites that have prices.
There are also lots of stores, like Sears and JC Penney, that do child
Now that's good advice.
Norm
"Paris, Leonard" wrote:
Norm,
What she is worth is what the customers are willing to pay for her work, not
what she (or we, for that matter) think that she is worth.
There are lots of child photography studios with web sites that have prices.
There are also
I have never heard of a second version of this
scanner. I got my Dual II and it did come with the
film/slide holders. The APS holder though is an extra
accessory. They might have put the price down to
attract buyers and then charge extra on the holders.
I'd call Minolta and check. You can find
Why do Americans always get so upset when we get dissed by another
country...WE are constantly dissing other cultures, etc The French are
a favorite foile, followed by Arabs, Chinese, Mexicans, Africans, etcso
whats the problem? We often times deserve the criticism...as do they at
Hi Rebecca and welcome to the group - beware though it can sometimes get a
little heated. And don't post any pictures of yourself unless you want gifts
on a regular basis - ask Tanya.
Just a little tip - People on this list prefer plain text messages but are
too polite except me to say so.
A scroll of mail from Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 12
Apr 2001 12:03:09 +0200
Read it? y
Are there anyone with experience with the small blinds you basically just put over
your head? Like Rue's Pocket Blind? Does it work?
*boggle* Does this work on the theory that if you can't see it, it
She has an AOL address, I don't think you can send plain text in the latest
version...
Norm
Peter Smith wrote:
Just a little tip - People on this list prefer plain text messages but are
too polite except me to say so. Yours are coming up as HTML.
Just click Format Plain text if you are
Hi,
I am jumping in late but just wanted to reinforce what some folks said.
When I studied photography, one of our instructors told us that, assuming
technical competence and good business behavior, and of course getting the
shots, it is a bad idea to undervalue your work, even from the
One more thing...I've had several people tell me that discounting makes
you appear, ah, cheap. As in used-car dealer cheap (sorry dad).
It was suggested to me that instead of trying to lower or discount
prices in order to sign people up, I should offer freebies or
incentives.
So, to encourage
I disagree to some extent, but my opinion might come off a little arrogant
so bear with me...
I do admit that when you take money to do a job for a client, you have to
please them. And if you happen *not* to be very well known, regarded, etc,
you may have to do work in a style that pleases your
You might also want to try some of the hunting magazines. They also have some
good articles, you know like, "How to Bludgeon a Deer to Death with a Long
Neck Budweiser Bottle". G
Norm
"Lewis, Gerald" wrote:
You might get some ideas from watching some of the hunting programs on
Bob Blakely wrote:
An article presented by one member subtlety demonstrating a not uncommon
attitude of many French toward Americans generally pissed me off. As I said
to one member who brought this up to me personally:
"I'm sorry, ___. I should have held my tongue [regarding the
You might get some ideas from watching some of the hunting programs on
TV.cableespecially those who are hunting the North American turkey...a
particularly wiley bird. These guys become experts at blending in with
their environment while still shouldering a gunwhy not a camera.
Jerry in
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl"
Subject: Re: Black and White Photography - Filters
Okay.
I'm getting a refreshed understanding of filters
myself these days. But my problem lies in another
area -- film and optimum contrast.
Particularly, I like the general
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:45:53 -0700, John Francis wrote:
I happened to be in the right place to grab this one
last Sunday at the Toyota Grand Prix of Long Beach
http://reality.sgi.com/jfrancis/motorsport/wildride.jpg
Great shot, John. Where were
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Nice pic for those who are interested in this sort of thing,
which will be all of us, given the subject.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html
Isn't that a great shot? I've been using it as wallpaper.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon
Because "painting with broad brushes", i.e. generalization, pisses off lots
of people, not just Americans. It's nothing one needs to "get over". It's a
natural response. If you can't understand it, perhaps you missed the point.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Lewis, Gerald
Let's see if this comes out better:
160 pounds (about $240?) MINT, MXV, 11 April 2001
http://www.mxv.co.uk/stock.htm
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
If my notice of the lens caused that scramble, I apologize. I copied the
data from the broweser and pasted it into my email message. If it has
caused such scrambling before, I was unaware of it. I'll try to be careful
and use "Paste-Simple."
By the way, Bucky: Do you take your name from
tom wrote:
One more thing...I've had several people tell me that discounting makes
you appear, ah, cheap. As in used-car dealer cheap (sorry dad).
Bernie "I just sold some of my SLEC holdings for billions" Ecclestone
started off as a used car dealer.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I knew someone from Texas would appreciate that :)
Norm
(who lived there quite a while)
"Lewis, Gerald" wrote:
You must have gone hunting here in Texas 8-)
Jerry in Houston
From: Norman Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You might also want to try some of the hunting magazines. They
You must have gone hunting here in Texas 8-)
Jerry in Houston
-Original Message-
From: Norman Baugher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blind or hide experience
You might also want to try some of the hunting
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Discussion Malling List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Tanya Russell Mayer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Additional comments to Tanya.
Most real pros only replace their equipment
Everything after the item number is random garbage eBay adds to their URLs
for no reason at all that I can tell. This should work just fine:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1229518157
Todd
At 02:16 PM 4/12/01 -0400, you wrote:
The URL still wraps. Do any or you have
Hi,
if I remember correctly Helmut Newton was involved in the photography
on that film.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, April 12, 2001, 6:56:59 PM, you wrote:
Check out the movie, "Eyes of Laura Mars," from the late seventies, I
think. Faye Dunaway plays a high fashion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Provencher, Paul M.
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Fairy pics/Photo Bizz
Thanks for the running commentary - glad to see I make sense to someone.
Question for the group:
I'm looking to purchase an ultra-wide angle lens for use with my ZX-5n. The Phoenix
AF 19-35mm f:3.5-4.5 seems to be in my budget range. Any comments on this particular
lens or other recommendations? I'm looking to supplement my Pentax SMCP-FA 28-80mm
f:3.5/5.6 and
Many thanks for the tips about camera shops in St.
Louis.
I believe that I've privately thanked everyone who
answered. If I missed someone, very sorry. This
one's for you.
I'm signing off until I get back. If I find something
interesting, I'll let you all know.
Best, John
=
John
If it is in St. Louis and it is colored red
then it's a Cardinal and should be dealt
with using appropriate measures.
Collin (the Cub fan)
(For those not understanding, this is Life ... err, Baseball)
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
Providing Broad-Spectrum Business
Todd wrote:
Of course, as photographers we instantly see this kind of stuff, but when
Joe Sixpack picks up the brochure, does he see it or even care?
He may not be aware, I agree - but he can tell the difference
even if he's unaware that he is doing so. Succinct,
Per the inquiries from Shel WW: In the Plus-X work I've done, development
was with the standard Kodak chemicals and by the book. That produces some
nice fine grain but also some low contrast. I'd like to improve that contrast
characteristic with same exposure setting. Normally I rated it at
The Super Takumar-Zoom 1:4.5/70~150 (S/N 4391349) was for many years "just"
a Super Takumar with traditional Super Takumar coatings. But according to
Gerjan van Oosten in "The Ultimate Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/907653702X/diecastpro
Asahi first used
"Matamoros, Cesar A." wrote:
John,
My co-worker was at this event. He loves the shot. He says that he
just has to be happy to be sitting in the stands using his imagination and
small digital camera. He is curious as to where you were.
Basically trackside, right up against the
Here we go again... Do you feel like sharing the reasons *why* you don't
like it, or what about it disappoints you, or are you satisfied with
coming across as a teenage flamer? As your post stands now, it's not very
useful to anyone thinking of buying an MZ-S.
chris
I just want to say
Just a little tip - People on this list prefer plain text messages but are
too polite except me to say so. Yours are coming up as HTML.
Just click Format Plain text if you are using MS outlook - if using
something else then have a search through the menus to see if you can find
the option.
Hello,
Also, i know it is more modern camera's, but is the
aperture priority mode and shutter priority modes
stepless? Meaning could it use a shutter speed of
1/317th of a second if it felt that would give
proper exposure.
Yes, the SUPER PROGRAM displays pre-defined values of shutter speed
Thanks Todd
Live and learn..
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Stanley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Test was(Re: A rare Bellows )
Everything after the item number is random garbage eBay adds to their URLs
HC110 is an adjustable, but usually quite high contrast, developer. I used it years
ago for astrophography- with Plus-X.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/12 1:47 PM
Per the inquiries from Shel WW: In the Plus-X work I've done, development
was with the standard Kodak chemicals and by the book. That
You are right her work is only worth what people are willing to
pay for it. However comparing her work to Sears and JC Penny's
is what we are advising her not to do. Respect is very
important
in how the public views your work.
You are aware, are you not, that most of us telling her not to
I believe all the M auto cameras featured stepless shutter speeds. As for the
aperture, my SP's LED typically tells me it can select a 5.7 aperture or other
non-standard f-stop if needed.
Steve S.
--
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently acquired
Hi,
They are some really nice images, they have scanned very well also.
Just out of curiosity what lenses, film and scanner did you use?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Cyril MARION" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: RE:
WRONG
Work for hire is when you are an employee of the
people who you are working for. As a simple rule of thumb,
if they are not paying you wages and taking out taxes you
are not doing work for hire. Short of a written agreement
otherwise that is the only way they could prove you were
Wow - I didn't know the U.S. was civilised. That's not what I see in the
pictures... how long have you lived here?
Tom C.
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, outside the US the laws may be different, but
most civilised countries are signaturies of the inter-
national
Many years ago, when I earned my living as a magazine writer and
photographer, my 35mm arsenal consisted of a Fuji 801 screw mount body,
a Vivitar 200/3.5, a Vivitar 20/3.5, a Mamiya 135/2.8, and a Fuji
50/1.4. I supplemented that with a Mamiya TLR with the early uncoated
80/2.8, and a Speed
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:33:32 -0700, John Francis wrote:
Bernie "I just sold some of my SLEC holdings for billions" Ecclestone
started off as a used car dealer.
Actually, I think he started off as spawn of Satan, then got a
promotion to car dealer. :-)
TTYL, DougF
PS. He is undoubtedly one
Collin ...
Kodak makes lots of developers. A typical, standard developer is
D-76. "By the book" could indicate one of two, or possibly three,
dilutions. However, since you're unable to give lots of detail, and
neither Bill nor I can see the negs (are they thin? Are highlights
blocked? How's
This is a slippery slope. To get a 'fix' that last, I would recommend
a 15mm, or maybe the Tamron or the Sigma 14mm/2.8.
This much I know: after the first time you look through the viewfinder
with a 15mm, nothing is ever the same.
The 15 is not my favorite lens.
Michel
- Original Message
... popping a few vitamin C pills with a nice cup of hot chocolate
at 3 in the morning, after 2 hours on the ice shooting a few rolls
of transparencies of the Aurora... and not a cloud in the sky!
Now I have a cold...
Michel
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Michel Adam wrote:
This much I know: after the first time you look through the viewfinder
with a 15mm, nothing is ever the same.
This much I can agree with. I always thought my 35 was wide, but when I got my hands
on a 17mm . . . WOAH, now when I put on the 35 I
think it must be one of
You're right, we aren't civilised, we're civilized . . . and civilized is a
word that is defined by the civilization that is judging, not the
civilization that is being judged . . . not exactly as black and white as
photography
Bill
aimcompute wrote:
Wow - I didn't know the U.S. was
For my 1995 wedding, the wedding pro wanted something like $2000. Well,
we're talking about a wedding comprising about 15 total people, counting
the bride, groom, and their families. That was too rich for my blood.
Not being aware that my request might be a big deal, I also asked whether I
could
I just noticed something about my three SPs: On two of them, the markings
go 400 800 ... 1600. On the third (serial number 1358162), the
markings go 400 ... 1000 ... 1600. Click stops are in 1/3 steps on both
varieties.
The ones that say 800 are currently mounted on a tripod and covered by
Yes, civilized is spelled with a z. Now why didn't my smell
checker
notice that? BTW, my spelling stinks, that is why I use a smell
checker g
--Tom
Bill Kane wrote:
You're right, we aren't civilised, we're civilized . . . and civilized is a
word that is defined by the civilization that is
Now that I have acquired ttwo Vivitar Series 1 telephotos--the 135/2.3 and
the 200/3.0--I find myself annoyed by the M42 screwmount-to-K mount
adapters. When I set about to remove the lens, the adapter stays in the
Super Program body; the lens unscrews from the adapter. It's VERY annoying
to have
The suggestion to visit websites and Sears and J.C. Penney was
intended to get her to look at the full range of pricing and
packages being offered. In doing so, she can see where she fits
into the range. Rarely can someone set their prices without
knowing what others are doing, and she must be
I've done this. The adaptor I got had a small tab that sticks out that
holds the adaptor in the Kmount. I just removed the little tab, it was
held it by a small screw. The adaptor still fit pretty really tight, so
the lens would tend to unscrew from the adaptor rather than having the
These were negs from 25 years ago. The developer was D-76, dilution unknown.
The paper was Kodak's RCII. I've just reprinted some of them on RCIII.
It appears that I should spend some time to (re)learn darkroom techniques.
Thanks,
Collin
From: Shel Belinkoff
I shoot pictures at many local horse shows not only for the riders at our barn but of
others
to sell at a meager profit.I to have many compliments re the sharpness of colour from
my
Pentax's(and i'm sure Kodak has something to add also).
Dave
Begin Original Message
From:
I just picked up my first copy of "View Camera".
What an inspiring journal!
Does anyone else look at it?
Collin
***
Data Processing Consultation, Inc.
Providing Broad-Spectrum Business Solutions and Assistance
http://members.iol21.com/dpconsult
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is
Agreed
Begin Original Message
From: "Provencher, Paul M." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:27:34 -0400
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Fairy pics
I disagree to some extent, but my opinion might come off a little arrogant
so bear with me...
I do
How about plexiglass, anyone have experience with it? suitable
substitute for glass in a fine art framed print?
Not in my opinion. It scratches far too easily, has inferior
optical qualities, and costs more than glass.
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Thanks Alin,
That's interesting, just been playing with the Ricoh KR-10 I received the
other day (Thank you again Mark), and noticed there is an adjustment for asa
settings of +/- 2.
Given a 3200 ASA film, I was told use it at 800 ASA. Am I right to assume
this is equivalent to 2 stops?
James
Ok, firstly everybody THANK-YOU so much for your insightful, informative and
detailed replies. I am glad to see that this topic has progressed into a
full-scale discussion that can be useful for many others on the list, as
well as myself.
Thankyou also to those of you who have offered
I have the Vivitar 17-28mm PKA mount. One of the great unsung lenses. Check
the rating site, photodo, and it gets a 4. It's built like a tank but you
have to be careful regarding flare
cheers - Martin
--- Bill Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michel Adam wrote:
This much I know: after the
Be careful, my friend, because I've gone through a MG and a ME Super in the
past few months because of electronic failure.
Also, be careful of the seals in the camera, that they are not going to
mush.
That is why I've recommended the ZX-M, or in Canada, MZ-M.
It's new and will get your student
Tanya Russell Mayer wrote:
[detailed business plan snipped]
Lemme know what you guys think
In general, it sounds like a good plan. You are putting a far more
resonable price on your own time, and setting expectations appropriately.
Just one place where I think you are still too
Hi Team,
I've been naughty :-)
I was re-organizing my tele-kit and was prompted to do a little
experimentation.
Thought: Wouldn't it be nice to be able to use the Rear Converter-A 2X-L on
my SMCPA*200f2.8, can't though, it won't fit, have to carry the 2X-S just for
this lens.
Light-bulb
Geeze Tom, you think I don't do my research or something?
The following is a direct quote from the Canadian Copyright Act.
Be aware that Canada is signatory to both the WTO treaty and the
Treaty of Berne. If your country is signatory to both of those
conventions, your copyright act is probably
http://www.jonmorgan.com
http://www.tonysweetphotography.com
I'm partial to my site as well.
Hope this helps,
Doug
At 8:10 PM -05004/12/01, Sid Barras caused thus to appear:
Hi,
I have acquired a very nice lady friend and agent who'd like to design a
web page for my photography. She is
martin tammer wrote:
Would appreciate any information at all about this lens. Can't find a thing
on the Internet.
Best regards - Martin.
Hi Martin,
I have this lens. Very nice. Excellent quality. there is info on the internet
though. Check Photodo.com and look at their lens testing results.
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl"
Subject: OT: Inspiration
I just picked up my first copy of "View Camera".
What an inspiring journal!
Does anyone else look at it?
I must start looking for it again. A friend of mine subscribed
for several years, so I was able to
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Russell Mayer"
Subject: My decision...
I would mark up the prints a bit more, I think. Do try to work
towards having your nrgatives printed as rarely as possible,
they do get scratched after a few printings. Have your work done
by a lab that is not
Tanya,
Sounds like a pretty reasonable plan, I guess. Only a couple of things to think about:
Plan for repeat business. Giving them 70-80 5x7's will assure that they will be awash
in photos for the foreseeable future. Maybe forever. You have a pretty good eye, but I
don't think you're yet at
Here in Richmond BC, Kwantlan College runs some Photography courses, and the
recommends SP's, SPF's and K1000's etc. Consequently they do go quickly, and
are a bit more expensive.
BTW: The SP II I saw a couple of weeks ago is still available at $165CDN
+tax, is this reasonable?
James
-
That's "the MZ-M everywhere in the world except the US, or in the US, the
ZX-M".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of martin tammer
Sent: April 12, 2001 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: suggested student cameras?
I've
Will consider sending some images to the gallery
after reading how to do it. My images have to be
rescanned or scaled down to meet the requirements.
I must add I visited the gallery again and enjoyed
it tremendously!!
Best Wishes
Eddie
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Sid,
I agree Doug's page is very nice...maybe a bit complicated for your friends
first try. You might take a hike thru the Pentax web ring at
http://www.phred.org/pentax/pdlist.html
Keeping it simple is a good idea.
Regards, Bob S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
