The composition is excellent! You were shooting into the
sun?
Yes.
It seems like you metered the water for the exposure. A
cokin red gradual
filter could have darkened up the sky and brought out some
clouds as well as
darkened the buildings.
Ah yes, red filters. Folks on the
;-))
Shel Belinkoff
[Original Message]
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5/13/2004 6:59:19 AM
Subject: PAW: BW
Here are a couple of black white shots I took on the Hudson River in
March.
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-05-09.html
Amita
German users, what's the difference between AntWort and Svar?
Thanks,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 3:28 PM
Subject: SV: 50/1.4 and 135/2.5
R i g h t ...
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fra: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
German users, what's the difference between AntWort and Svar?
The language.
DagT
(who represents one of the languages using svar instead of Antwort og reply :-)
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Ryan Lee wrote:
German users, what's the difference between AntWort and Svar?
Antwort means answer in German.
Svar means answer in Danish and Swedish.
Svar is, as far as I know, not a German word at all.
However, it is very silly of Microsoft to have translated the Re:
Hi Dario,
On Wed, 12 May 2004 19:59:07 +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I still cannot understand why people keep shooting RAW with the *ist D, as
the Pentax RAW converter does a worse job (too evident pixelation on
outlines) than the in-camera software. Hard to believe, very hard to
justify, but
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 22:31, David Nelson wrote:
FJW Ah... checking for pentax news at 6:30 in the morning before uni...
FJW
FJW http://pentaxusa.com/news/news_display.cfm?pressid=190
FJW
FJW PENTAX Imaging Company has announced a second lens designed for the
FJW *ist D digital SLR will ship
Thursday, May 13, 2004, 1:39:36 AM, Herb wrote:
HC it was announced at PMA. did they finally get it up on their web site?
Well, DPREVIEW is in its NEWS section merely a press release
dissemination service. So probably just now got Sigma around to
put out a press release.
Fra
on 5/13/04 12:03 PM, Frits Wüthrich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It talks about the new quick-shift-focus-system. Would this make trap focus
possible?
I don't thinks so. Purpose of this system is to allow manual focusing
without the need to switch anything - just turn focussing ring (much like
On May 13, 2004, at 7:05 AM, Cotty wrote:
I use a couple of 512MB cards, shoot jpeg, and load onto a PowerBook.
Not
been defeated yet. I print onto inkjet.
Sounds messy. Most of us print onto paper.
g
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
they go out of their way to hide it since it since they don't say anything
in their financial statements, which regulates what they must say.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:51 PM
Subject: Re:
Nikon itself spent 1995-2000 in the red, and the camera division was in the
red until last year. their chip equipment has been the only consistent money
making division in the last 10 years, and even then, lost money in 2002.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Adobe RAW converter seems to work well.
The Pentax RAW converter works just fine, presuming that you are
making prints, rather than looking at your images as 4x6 foot murals
on a computer screen.
My friend with the Canon Digital Rebel sez this complaint
Hi Frank,
very nice!
I liked most the Tambourine II, The moment, Jennifer (Yes, the blurred
one!), maybe few others.
The blurred one is very interesting. It does have some tension,
something that gives the mind's image of little paris cafes, 20s, in a
not so romantic way. Good!
Do you have
DF All of the movies are available on DVD, as well as the episodes of
DF Flying Circus. I have the movies but not the episodes.
DF TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Thanks. I have all of the episodes on VHS casettes, which takes about
one full row in my library :) Just having several disks would be
much nicer,
on 5/13/04 7:28 AM, Jens Bladt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who makes their own sensors for digital imaging. SONY,Canon,...?
Kodak, Sharp, Nikon and at last Philips did.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
JF I tried dcraw - I even went as far as to download the source and take
JF a look at it. At least part of my playing around with my own conversion
JF code is based on my dissatisfaction with dcraw; quite aprt from the fact
JF that the conversion process loses all the EXIF information, I found
You can download a trian of Photoshop CS and then update the RAW
convertor to have 30 days of Pentax conversion. Warning though, it will
result in some expense later!
-Original Message-
From: Frantisek Vlcek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 May 2004 12:01
To: John Francis
On Monday 10 May 2004 17:16, wendy beard wrote:
FJW What do you all use for conversion?
FJW
FJW Wendy
Photoshop CS.
--
Frits Wüthrich
What IS that car?
The front end design looks like Honda did it, but it sure is small!
keith whaley
Gaurav Aggarwal wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1644790size=lg
I didn't have a better scanner last year so the quality isn't that good.
Taken with ME Super 50mm f/1.7 handheld.
Any of you hams going to be @ Dayton tomorrow?
Steven (KC8TPR) I (KC8TKA) are going.
I'll wear either a Pentax or an IBM/Lotus cap.
We'll be there from opening 'til about 2:30.
Collin
---
'Same Bat Time, Same Bat Channel'
-- a meaningless, nonpolitical sig. line meant to offend
Which brings up a good question: What are folks printing their *istD images
with?
I use a Canon S800 with a BJC8200 as a backup.
Paper used is Ilfords Classic Gloos/Pearl and Epson Glossy.
I recently bought an Olympus P-400 dye-sub.The few test prints i
RS I flogged the crap out of my X-Drive after I slapped it together (that roughly
RS translates to: I tested it thoroughly with all manner of connections and
RS storage cards after assembled and I commissioned it).
I am curious, does any maker of the image tanks give important
information like
I tested 3 different M50/1.4 about 3 years ago. One was superb, one excellent,
and one focused on a 15 degree plane at 1.4 but was OK at smaller stops. What
one needs to know is these lenses were manufactured in the late 70's to early
80's. That means they are 20-25 years old.
You have no way
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: PAW - Some duck in the park
Humans tend to be a little consumed with self importance (so I've
heard).
Hence our concern with having our photographs last a millenium.
William Robb
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
I am curious, does any maker of the image tanks give important
information like the make of the hdd inside (some cheap crap or
what?), vibration/impact it can stand (normalised for peak impact and
long vibration, both in standby and operation) and
On 12/5/04, FRANK, discombobulated, offered:
Python on DVD? I have no idea...
Here ya go...
http://www.bbcshop.com/icat/151bklist=icat,4,,525,151
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
frank theriault wrote:
Shawn,
PAW stands for Photo a Week. So, you submit a photo every week, more or
less. No one is counting. If you miss a week, you don't get kicked out or
anything. If you post more than one a week, well, I guess that's fine, too
(although if you, like, do it
Thursday, May 13, 2004, 1:39:36 AM, Herb wrote:
HC it was announced at PMA. did they finally get it up on their web site?
Well, DPREVIEW is in its NEWS section merely a press release
dissemination service. So probably just now got Sigma around to
put out a press release.
Fra
Strange, because
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Adobe RAW converter seems to work well.
The Pentax RAW converter works just fine, presuming that you are
making prints, rather than looking at your images as 4x6 foot murals
on a computer screen.
My friend with the Canon Digital Rebel sez this
On 13 May 2004 at 9:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i put a piece of black electical tape over the film window,will that be
enough to block out natural daylight or would 2-3 pieces be better.
Or.
Should something else be used.
Assuming that the film window does leak IR (I really have no
Markus Maurer wrote:
They used mirrors, self timer, cable release, hand holding
and their best friends and some weak excuses.
.sometime later, after they were released from Police custody on bail:
Self portraits are something that I find little interest in, although
perhaps as a
Thanks Rob.
I'm assuming the window might leak a bit,thus the quiry.:-)
Dave
On 13 May 2004 at 9:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If i put a piece of black electical tape over the film window,will that be
enough to block out natural daylight or would 2-3
Hello Collin (and other Hams),
I'm glad there are a few hams on this list! What is happening in Dayton? I
was studying an ARRL manual to get my Ham radio license a few years ago. I
actually looked at some portable transceivers from Kenwood and Yaesu. I
still plan on getting that license
according to recently released analysts reports in Japan, Pentax has sold about
20,000 *istD cameras worldwide, far less than the 50,000 forecast by the company.
reasons cited by analysts for the low sales include lack of competative features
and brand recognition. despite this, Pentax has revised
Anders, Dag,
Jag förstår perfekt! Tack så mycket :-) For some strange reason I thought
Bladt was a German family name and imagined .dk to be .de.. I need some
sharpening..
Thanks,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 6:47
In their wisdom, William Robb Co. wrote:
The Adobe RAW converter seems to work well.
The Pentax RAW converter works just fine, presuming that you are
making prints, rather than looking at your images as 4x6 foot murals
on a computer screen.
My friend with the Canon Digital Rebel sez this
Markus requested answers to the following questions:
1 Would you like to see the collected results after an opinion poll or is
it
good enough for you to read the answering emails?
I have never really thought about it, but rather enjoyed your little
roundup of the results of your self
frank theriault wrote:
At the end of April, I shot a few more rolls of my friend Jennifer, and her
group, Pirate Jenny. This time I used TMax 3200 (I find it very grainy,
moreso than Neopan 1600 pushed).
So, here's 3 photos from the concert:
One is Champaign (Kevin's) and the other is Shae's, probably non-alcoholic
beer since she's on medication that prevents her using alcohol.
It was an outside wedding and the table was not level. So uneven in fact
that the decoration on top of the cake fell off
The diagonal brace you refer to is
Which brings up a good question: What are folks printing their *istD images
with?
I use an Epson 2000P. I also have an Olympus P-400 (like Dave). Am seriously
considering either the HP 7960 or Epson R800 as well to be a general purpose printer
for other documents (I have an HP Deskjet 970C
Here are a couple of black white shots I took on the Hudson River in
March.
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-05-09.html
Amita
.. I'm back. But I'm off to bed shortly too much Sasser today.
An abstract of sorts this time, nothing slithery or spidery:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2347848size=sm
Comments of any persuasion welcome of course.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
AH As for the make of the HDD, if you prefer some special brand, you can
AH always get the empty version and install your own. I got myself one with a
AH 40 GB drive already installed and have not checked out the HDD brand.
Oh, I haven't seen they sell an empty version!
AH I can give you a
jwc If you are that concerned about storing large images while out in the field,
jwc then buy a small rugged laptop (12 screen) with a cd burner (or even
jwc better, a DVD burner). This would be a good alternative or addition to an
jwc image tank. One of the disadvantages however is extra weight
Legacy systems create markets for legacy items . . . But truly, the CF
card is currently a very small object. Aside from marketing, is there
any real advantage to having something smaller? Leave the card the same
size and just make it higher capacity.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Hi!
Here are a couple of black white shots I took on the Hudson River
in
March.
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-05-09.html
Amita
Amita, you probalby don't need a DSLR g... I like both though the
first one works much better for me. It has meaning and it has many
ways to interpret it.
Legacy systems create markets for legacy items . . . But
truly, the CF card is currently a very small object. Aside
from marketing, is there any real advantage to having
something smaller?
I don't think so. SD cards are smaller and more delicate. I'd rather
deal with a sturdy CF card
All of the movies are available on DVD, as well as the
episodes of Flying Circus. I have the movies but not the episodes.
I'm going to see Life of Brian at the theater tonight. Woohoo! They
released it for the 30th anniversary, but also to capitalize on buzz
from The Passion. :)
When we were at GFM last year, Debbie commented on that. You could tell
it was a photo weekend not byt he quality of the cameras but by the fact
that everyone had a tripod/monopod.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/12/04 04:41PM
This surprises you? Snapshooters don't use things like tripods,
monopods, or
Nice BW photos!
The composition is excellent! You were shooting into the sun?
It seems like you metered the water for the exposure. A cokin red gradual
filter could have darkened up the sky and brought out some clouds as well as
darkened the buildings. IMHO, I would like to see the sky
Rob,
That is a striking abstract! The purple highlights near the top of the
photo are great! Simply amazing.
~Alejandro
.. I'm back. But I'm off to bed shortly too much Sasser today.
An abstract of sorts this time, nothing slithery or spidery:
The only one I can think of is that a smaller lighter object may be less
likely to be damaged if dropped. Aside from that, a smaller physical
footprint leaves more design 'headroom' for the rest of the device. Many
PDA's are moving away from Compact Flash, and I suspect this is partly the
Several things:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardi/
The first two pictures are just for amusement. WL owns the old
Lexington Train Station. Since we now want to put an art/music building
there, we have to move it about 150 meters. This is an old (130 yrs)
brick building so it's interesting to try
Jens,
Is the F 50/1.4 truly a better performer than the FA or the A
version? I have heard this before, and yet the F version of the lens
is nearly impossible to find! I have the FA and A versions, and they
are beautiful with wonderful results. Where does the F lens have an
edge (probably not
A colleague at work (who used an Olympus OM-1 as a photojournalist
years ago) was recently given this novelty chocolate item as a gift.
Has anyone ever seen one in a Pentax mold?
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/Choco_olympus.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/Choco_olympus2.jpg
Having
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Butch Black wrote:
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup: Z-1p, K1000, K 28/3.5, K 35/3.5, M 50/1.4, A
50/1.7, M 50/2.0, M 100/4.0 macro,
Joe Wilensky wrote:
The FA 50mm f/1.4 build quality seems decent for an autofocus lens,
about on par with the other FA primes like the 35/2 and 28/2.8. The FA
zooms that extend in length like the 28-105 f/3.2-? and the 24-90 feel
flimsier, but that's because of the extended barrel. The FA
Markus wrote:
thanks, and I have 2 slightly different blue grey ones, but the rest of the
body, h.
Tried to make a close-up of an eye of LeoLeuLowenzahn the cat to combine it
with mine, but he was not in the right mood
for that! But soon he will be hungry again and
The 300 is a big, heavy lens. Could you do without it on a regular
basis?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/13/04 01:22PM
Hi Guys;
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup:
Do you carry all that with you when you go out to photograph? If so, fer
gawd sake, why?
Shel Belinkoff
[Original Message]
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So
I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not
Thanks Ryan.
I'm very Danish, even though my great grand parents were living in Germany
(according to the boarders, drawn after the lost war in 1864, but still
regarded themselves as Danish. In 1920 there was a referendum - in Germany
and Denmark, according to which a new boarder line was drawn
Holy cow! That's sweet.
Norm
KT Takeshita wrote:
snip and the net profit up 351.2%.
snip
Hi Guys;
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup: Z-1p, K1000, K 28/3.5, K 35/3.5, M 50/1.4, A
50/1.7, M 50/2.0, M 100/4.0 macro, M 135/3.5, M 200/4.0, FA* 300/4.5,
Hello Joe
I only know/own the A 2.8 and the K 2.5. The K version was my first 135mm -
unfortunately I sold it with an MX years ago. I finally managed to get one
at ebay (USA) sometime ago. The K version is better. Sharper at full
aperture. The A version is still very good, but the K is excellent.
Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the F 50/1.4 truly a better performer than the FA or the A
version?
IIRC, the F and FA versions are optically identical.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
If I really want attention, I throw a big black blanket over my head
Norm
G
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Tripod/Monopad Users :-)
what really amazes me:
If I carry only camera body and lens and flash - nearly nobody cares after a
minute beside some first glances
Mounting a monopod changes that
Hi!
GA http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1644790size=lg
GA I didn't have a better scanner last year so the quality isn't that good.
GA Taken with ME Super 50mm f/1.7 handheld. Scanned from a 4x6 print and
GA no post-processing done (I don't know how to do any :-(
Given the gear I
Hi, Anders,
What country or region does the nu in your webpage URL
represent? Is it an autonomous region of Sweden? I'm curious. I
can only think of Nunavut, which is a region of Canada, not
Sweden. Of course if you had told me the duck and seal pictures
were taken in Nunavut, I wouldn't
Hi!
RS .. I'm back. But I'm off to bed shortly too much Sasser today.
RS An abstract of sorts this time, nothing slithery or spidery:
RS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2347848size=sm
RS Comments of any persuasion welcome of course.
I am kinda sorry, but it reminds me of this:
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
Because Scandinavia are the countries which have a part of the Scandic
mountains. Finland do not. They are not a part of Scandinavia, but they
are a part of the Nordic countries.
Scandinavia is Sweden, Norway and Denmark.
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
The advertised focal length of Pentax's DA zoom is 16mm to 45mm. Am I
correct to assume that the lengths reflect the 1.5x conversion? In other
words, I wouldn't end up with a 24-68 when paired with a *istD.
The advertised focal length is the true
Do you carry all that with you when you go out to photograph? If so, fer
gawd sake, why?
Shel Belinkoff
A back up body in case of camera failure. The lenses under the assumption
that the lens left behind would be the one I needed. As the body of my
question states the kit has gotten too heavy
Thanks, it is certainly one of the busier lists I subscribe to! And
thanks to all those who provided guidance on pricing.
Antonio
On 13 May 2004, at 05:10, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Antonio,
Welcome to the list. I would say that an average price for the SMC
85/1.8 is about $350, the SMC-M 85/2
Unfortunately,they only get moved if someone buys them for a $1.00 than pays the moving
costs to the
new location.
We lose a lot,but manage to save a few each year.
Thats my BW project that is on going.Trying to shoot as much farm scenes as possible
before they
are gone.Happining all to fast
Okay, while I'm absorbing that, tell me...I was always told .nu had a
question mark after it, like: Nu?
Nu?
keith whaley g
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance, but where do the Finns fit in?
I always think of Scandinavia as being
The discussion on digital storage made me go back online to do some research. Has
anyone used the above? (They come in different capacities.) It is a portable hard
drive storage unit, without the capacity to display images. They are certainly
affordable. On dpreview, though, there were a couple
The only thing you'd miss would be the seminars. We'd be glad to have you.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: GFM Question
Since I never know where I'll be the next week, it's
On 13/5/04, HERMANN, discombobulated, offered:
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
My God. Only now? You have been remarkably froogle in your kit purchase Butch!
I think that happened to me about ten minutes after I bought some Pentax
gear, mind you, the bag
On 13/5/04, GRAYWOLF, discombobulated, offered:
Actually the difference is that each time you save a jpeg you lose data.
That is
the price you pay for the compact file size. If you are going to shoot
and print
without much editing then jpeg is fine.
But if you load your jpeg in photoshop and
Keith Whaley wrote:
Okay, while I'm absorbing that, tell me...I was always told .nu had a
question mark after it, like: Nu?
Nu?
keith whaley g
Nu means now in swedish.
So Nu? means basically Now?
In the top-level-domain there is no question mark.
/Henri
Scandinavians are those people who are all insufferably tall, trim and
blond, and make me feel inferior when I stand next to them!
Hi, Jens,
I was asking specifically about the f 50/1.4. I know it's supposedly
optically identical to the A and FA versions, but I've read several
places that the F version is ranked highest, at least by those who
have used it.
Joe
Hello Joe
I only know/own the A 2.8 and the K 2.5. The K
According to Photodo test, it's one of the best lenses (resolution) ever
made (tested by Photodo).
http://www.photodo.com/nav/prodindex.html
Omly one and slower 50MM lens (Leica SUMICRON-M 2.0) lens was given THIS
GRADE: 4.6 by Photodo.
The FA was given 4.2
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
Always to go against the grain, I do not carry a tripod with me to GFM.
Though I have been used as a tripod sherpa.
Story, if interested, on the mountain,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:42 AM
You may very well be wrong.
Danish - as well as English - is a Germanic language. In fact there's a lot
of English words, that are originally Danish (old nordic), brought to
England by the Vikings. The word table is one example. Strand is
annother (beach).
1000 years ago, before French etc.
(Yust a little joke, Henri... has to do with Yiddish.)
keith
Henri Toivonen wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Okay, while I'm absorbing that, tell me...I was always told .nu had a
question mark after it, like: Nu?
Nu?
keith whaley g
Nu means now in swedish.
So Nu? means basically Now?
In the
Thanks Henri and Anders for answering my question.
Niue opened it's Internet domain .nu for world wide registration
by anyone in 1997 and it instantly got very popular in Sweden to
register .nu domains for two reasons. ...
...
Nope, they're taken in the Stockholm archipelago.
After
Got my Epson R210 last night. Its a pleasure to use. Not at all
expensive, beautiful photo prints, and prints labels direct to CD as well.
Borderless printing doesn't seem to work at all with Photoshop, so I
have to convert the file to bmp or jpg and use the Epson Photoquicker
software (am I
I like the way dogs and their owners look alike...
Christian
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 7:57 AM
Subject: PAW - Dog Show
As that's where I was all day on Saturday, here's one of the pics.
Funny, researchers have recently agreed with you:
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1891552
t
On 5/13/04 14:09, Christian wrote:
I like the way dogs and their owners look alike...
Christian
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss
The other day I was noticing that, as I put weight on my bogen 3221 tripod
(*ist D, Sigma 300/4 and 1.4x TC and StudioBall QR) one of the upper leg
sections was loose. The tripod was sinking below me. So I went home, got a
socket wrench and tightened the locking mechanism. Well, after a turn or
On 13/5/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
Since I never know where I'll be the next week, it's consequently hard
for me to plan stuff like GFM. However, I might be able to make it, but
I think it's sold out.which is really not a problem for me (I've
only shot two rolls of
Hi all,
I recently acquired a Program Plus and SMC Pentax-A 50/1.7 in outstanding
cosmetic condition. Maybe the physical condition should have been an alert
as to why the camera was hardly used.
After installing fresh silver oxide batteries and a roll of film I noted
the following problems:
On 13/5/04, HEMI HEAD STENQUIST, discombobulated, offered:
That's good news. I may make the trip as well if I can clear the calendar.
Paul
YO. Please try buddy. It would be so good to meet yer.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Antwort is a German word. Svar is a Danish word.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. maj 2004 09:35
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: 50/1.4 and 135/2.5
German users, what's the
I see. I just remembered, that Pentax excuse for not making the DMS-S weas
sensor problems. I know Nikon and pentax are using SONY sensors (D100, *ist
D). I guess it would give a brand an advangtage to be able to spevcially
co-disign camera and sensor. Are Canon making thier own? Fuji Film does.
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Sherburne
Subject: Quick DA question...
Hello all...
The advertised focal length of Pentax's DA zoom is 16mm to 45mm. Am
I
correct to assume that the lengths reflect the 1.5x conversion?
In other
words, I wouldn't end up with a 24-68 when paired
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: PAW: Just when you thought it was safe...
.. I'm back. But I'm off to bed shortly too much Sasser today.
An abstract of sorts this time, nothing slithery or spidery:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2347848size=sm
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
Should you want to just print up to A4 size prints, a 4Mpix digicam
is more
than enough, hence don't worry about DSLR, interchangeable lenses,
RAW
shooting, portable hard disks, terabytes of
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
