Crippled or not.
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I can't speak to your idea of value or address your budgetary concerns.
However, the 77 Ltd is a great lens, it works beautifully on the DS, and is
worth every penny you'll pay for it. It's the first auto focus lens I've
ever used, and the first I've used on the DS. Go for it!
As for price,
Thanks for your remarks Godfrey; always informative. I think I'll start
working toward getting the DA14/2.8 and eventually a DA70/2.4Ltd (when
available). The latter sounds absolutely ideal. Where does it fall on
the roadmap?
A couple people have mentioned that I ought to just get my use
Why? What advantage do you see that the 70/2.4 has over the 77/1.8? Size,
perhaps?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
SMC Pentax-FA 77mm f/1.9 Limited
Pros: Image quality, build quality, convenient focal length.
Cons: What amateur can honestly justify its price tag?
Hi all
to my surprise the Pentax SFXn gives me focus confirmation with the SP
Tamron F8 mirror lens. A feature that should only work with lenses faster
than F4 I thought ;-)
greetings
Markus
Hi Tim
Maybe I misunderstood you but what has all this photoshopping to do with
your original bird project?
I strongly dislike the way you have choosen here and hope you have read my
last post ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Expect it not to. Pre-flash based TTL and Auto-Thyristor flash are both
more reliable with Digital than plain TTL. It's remarkable that TTL ever
worked with the *ist's (the only other recent DSLR to support TTL flash
was the Fuji S2 Pro, all others use a pre-flash based system like E-TTL,
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/02 Sun PM 09:41:51 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: D'oh
On 2/4/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Don't do *UV* filters.
Couldn't get by without the occasional polarizer, myself...
Yah, I'll give you
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/02 Sun PM 10:11:03 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Website Help Needed
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, mike wilson wrote:
The PUG works excellently because it oonly opens the one new window, which
continuously loops
On Apr 2, 2006, at 11:42 PM, David Oswald wrote:
Thanks for your remarks Godfrey; always informative. I think I'll
start working toward getting the DA14/2.8 and eventually a
DA70/2.4Ltd (when available). The latter sounds absolutely ideal.
Where does it fall on the roadmap?
The
It's smaller and lighter, and it will have the quick-shift focus
feature. I hope it will be a little less expensive. The slightly
shorter focal length would probably suit me a little better too. I'd
might prefer the 77/1.8 over the 70/2.4, but for that focusing mount
feature.
Godfrey
On
I'm happy to report that neither Jostein nor myself were arrested for
photographing (in the dark) the militarily strategic bridges across the River
Tyne.
We were, however, accosted by a few young females in various stages of undress
with certain requests (Take me photo, willya?) that we
On 2/4/06, David Oswald, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cons: What amateur can honestly justify its price tag?
No amateur has to justify any price tag. What price lust?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 3 Apr 2006 at 6:57, mike wilson wrote:
One or two lenses (300/2.8?) require a filter blank (filters at the back of
the lens) to focus properly in the first place.
Not in the A*300/2.8 or any other of the long recent Pentax lenses that I'm
aware of.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
By the way, I saw Metz did release a new version of their 45 flashes
with E-TTL (and others) compatibility. Interesting I'd say ...
On 4/3/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Expect it not to. Pre-flash based TTL and Auto-Thyristor flash are both
more reliable with Digital than plain TTL.
FA - are for 35mm SLR's, not small digital sensors, although, 23.7x17.5 is in
the middle of its field, as such highest quality lense produce is expected on
digital. Just remember 1.5x times focal length.
Peace,
--- David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ---
SMC Pentax-FA 77mm f/1.9 Limited
I think f/5.6 is the general consensus for the limit a lens can
provide honest AF.
Some go till 6.7 or beyond. Keep in mind it might work nicely if
you're in a well lighted area.
I can confirm mine does that too on my Z1, and probably D also.
On 4/3/06, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 3 Apr 2006 at 10:48, Roman wrote:
FA - are for 35mm SLR's, not small digital sensors, although, 23.7x17.5 is in
the middle of its field, as such highest quality lense produce is expected
on digital. Just remember 1.5x times focal length.
FA lens - are for all 35mm K mount SLRs, DA
We're not foreigners, Mate.
We are Strailyun
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Strailya
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 7:44 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Daylight Savings, Aussie (well, NSW and VIC) digital cameras
On 2/4/06, William Robb,
8-( In the UK, most peoples' house contents insurance would cover that. I'd
put in for the 28-80/2.8...
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/03 Mon AM 12:50:55 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Another one bites the dust
T.V. having left us a while ago, I guess I
David Oswald wrote on 03.04.06 5:02:
SMC Pentax-FA* 85mm f/1.4
Pros: It's an FA*! It's super fast.
Cons: Big, expensive, reportedly not ideally suited to digital.
That's not true. FA* 85/1,4 is an absolute top performer on digital. It is
very useable at f1.4, getting razor sharp at f2.8 and
I like enough of Louis Sullivan and Wright to have taken tours
around Chicago. And I like the Empire State Building.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:18:44 +0100, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's right here for people who
Thanks to Dave and to all the numerous others who responded to my
request for help. If I had know there would be this many, I would have
suggested responding offline. But I'm very appreciative. My daughter
has already made some changes in response to points raised here.
Probably more to come.
On Apr 2, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No problem. Thanks for the kudos on the photos, but they're not
mine. This is my advertising website, not photography. (In real
life, I'm an advertising hack.) The site is aimed at a very narrow
audience of headhunters and creative
Yep.
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 2, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No problem. Thanks for the kudos on the photos, but they're not mine.
This is my advertising website, not photography. (In real life, I'm
an advertising hack.) The site is aimed at a very
BTW, two of the photos -- the Jeep and the PT Cruiser -- are the work
of Clint Clemens.
Paul
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 2, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No problem. Thanks for the kudos on the photos, but they're not mine.
This is my advertising website,
I'm around at Easter and Mayday. Probably away mid-May.
John
On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 22:51:06 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, anyway, a PDML. I will mull over a suitable place and time. Is
anybody
up for a weekend one, or do you prefer a
Tim,
I like the original better. This one is too dark, and
for some reason it makes the color unappealing--it
reminds me of Philadelphia air on a really hot, sticky
July evening.
Rick
--- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red
picture.
I took my ist D along to a gathering of my extended
family Saturday. I was able to get some okay pix
using my old TTL Sunpak flash, but...
I =REALLY= miss having the flash shoe over the grip,
as it is on the Z-series cameras, instead of over the
prism. My favorite way of shooting indoors with
Marcus. I did read your post. Don't worry, this is not a crappy lens...
this is something different. It's a spin off idea.
You say you strongly dislike this photoshoping. That's strong words, I'll
give you credit for that ;-)
I assume you dislike it out of ethical reasons.
I should confess; I
I say very nice photo Boris.
Good job
Dave B
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12858
What do you say?
Boris
Equine Photography in York Region
I like the downward look to the photo. He does not seem to happy here Frank.
BTW, no Pamela.??:-)
Dave
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4285748
Thanks for looking and commenting!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Nice expressions on both faces.
Colour mix is good.
Dave B
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th.
This was going to be BW, but the skin tones, the
Pretty good even at high iso
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please forgive if this already came through. I didn't see it show up
or in the archives.
Shot at Monterey Aquarium - not sure how I'd feel in open water having
one of these guys swimming so close.
Pentax *istD, DA
Nor my A*300 f/2.8.
J
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Apr 2006 at 6:57, mike wilson wrote:
One or two lenses (300/2.8?) require a filter blank (filters at
the back of the lens) to focus properly in the first place.
Not in the A*300/2.8 or any other of the long recent
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:01:32 +0200, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I took my ist D along to a gathering of my extended
family Saturday. I was able to get some okay pix
using my old TTL Sunpak flash, but...
I =REALLY= miss having the flash shoe over the grip,
as it is on the Z-series
Lucas Rijnders wrote on 03.04.06 15:44:
Will the *ist-D trigger the infrared beam from an external flash?
As long as it is connected with suitable cable, yes.
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Crippled or not.
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I
won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is
a Metz
60-CT2.
Why on earth would you expect that the new top-end
Both the 300/2.8 and the 600/4 take rear filters. I've seen that it is a
requirement for a filter blank to be in place for the optics to work properly
with other lenses (the Tamron 300/2.8 for example) so assumed that it could be
the case with those.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
I'm around at Easter and Mayday. Probably away mid-May.
I'm away for Easter and Mayday, but probably around mid-May... and other
times. :-)
S
Gremlins come in threes, it seems.
Went to nephew's birthday party:
1) My 28-80mm zoom lens was frozen at 50mm. Dang, switch to the 85mm.
2) My Sigma flash decided not to fire - everything looked normal, but just
didn't fire. Then it just sat there blinking. Dirty contacts? Dud battery? No
time
Jens Bladt wrote on 03.04.06 8:22:
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Sell all these oldies and buy one solid, modern, P-TTL, HSS and wireless
capable flash
Hi Rick
And with that setup did you just let both Flash at TTL setting and no
further corrections for indoor shots?
Frankly I haver never used the build in flash on the SFXn alone or in
combination so far, would be interesting.
I guess there has to be a minimal distance of about 1.5 meters to get
Or buy a D2H. You'll need a back up body sure as shooting.:-)
Dave(now with D200)Brooks
Quoting Mike Nosal [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gremlins come in threes, it seems.
Went to nephew's birthday party:
1) My 28-80mm zoom lens was frozen at 50mm. Dang, switch to the 85mm.
2) My Sigma flash decided
Mike Nosal wrote on 03.04.06 15:54:
1) My 28-80mm zoom lens was frozen at 50mm. Dang, switch to the 85mm.
I guess your lens has converted itself to varifocal type :-P
2) My Sigma flash decided not to fire - everything looked normal, but just
didn't fire. Then it just sat there blinking. Dirty
That's right. Works brilliantly on the PZ-1p; don't
know about the SFXn. Nice even lighting, no shadows,
and much more natural-looking than bounce flash alone,
IMHO.
Examples here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=528842
Rick
--- Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick
Lucas,
Thanks, but I don't think so. The adapter Fg has a 5p
socket on top rather than a flash shoe.
Rick
--- Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick,
Bojidar Dimitrov states it in a rather roundabout
way, but I think hot
shoe adapter Fg will allow popping up the internal
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I
won't be
buying it. I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses,
one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Sell all these oldies and buy one solid, modern, P-TTL, HSS and
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:19:08 +0200, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lucas,
Thanks, but I don't think so. The adapter Fg has a 5p
socket on top rather than a flash shoe.
Rick,
You're right. I thought Fg was an evolution of F, but it obviously isn't.
--
Sorry, Lucas
--- Lucas
I'd started writing an email similar to your original post several
times over the past few months, but never finished it. I'm in a
similar situation, although the lens lineup I have is a little
different. I don't have the 16-45, but the kit 18-55 instead, and I
have the FA100/2.8 Macro instead of
I had a 72mm Hoya Circular Polarizer hit the boat deck in Alaska. It landed
on edge, split in two and I was chasing the two halves which rolling around
the deck.
Tom C.
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: D'oh
Who said only?
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 15:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Crippled or not.
If the
Does that method use the flash's contrast control mode?
Joe
That's right. Works brilliantly on the PZ-1p; don't
know about the SFXn. Nice even lighting, no shadows,
and much more natural-looking than bounce flash alone,
IMHO.
Examples here:
Jens Bladt wrote:
Who said only?
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 15:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Last night, while trying to get some pics of my cat in a very dark room, I
decided to try the pop-up flash on the istDS. A little symbol in the
viewfinder was blinking, and upon checking into the cause, I found that
flash compensation had been set. So, what is flash compensation and when
would
Yes, but it's the camera's contrast control mode.
--- Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that method use the flash's contrast control
mode?
Joe
That's right. Works brilliantly on the PZ-1p;
don't
know about the SFXn. Nice even lighting, no
shadows,
and much more
The flash exposure compensation (FEC) control adjusts the total
amount of flash exposure in much the same way as the EV compensation
control affects the ambient exposure calibration: it sets the flash
metering circuit to adjust the amount of flash used in the exposure
up or down based upon
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note the only DSLR on the market today which supports plain TTL is the DS2.
And the D. Probably the DS as well, although I have no personal experience with
that camera. However, both of my Ds work fine in
Question for the Mac users.
Lately and only on occasion, when i shut down the ibook, i get a pop up
screen that says to the efect: Unable to shut down, Mirror agent
application did not quit properly. You can force quite.etc etc.
Any idea whats happening here. It seems to do it after
One or two lenses (300/2.8?) require a filter blank (filters at the
back of the lens) to focus properly in the first place.
600mm FA f4.0, although I never shot without the filter in place so I have
no idea of the effect.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Non of my replies, or postings to day have made it back to me, so i'll
do a test.
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
Really? Both my A* 300/f2.8 and my FA* 250-600/f5.6 came with a
set of drop-in filters (albeit different sizes for each lens) that
included what appears to be a plain glass filter. I'm pretty sure
it's recommended practice to have a piece of glass in the optical
path there - why else would
BTW, I didn't know that my PENTAX *ist D was their very cheapest DSLR?
I knew it was their first one, though.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 17:29
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne:
Do all the Software Updates. Things do get fixed in them... I login
to my Admin account once a week and apply any Software Updates
available. Haven't been any for a couple of weeks now.
Are you using automatic synching of your .Mac account iDisk or
synching calendars/address book, etc to
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I know is, that I'm not interested in using ANY preflash - at all.
It's bad enough, that the people I photograph must put up with one flash
light. I would never use a flash system that requires more than one flash
burst.
First of all, it will give me a shutter lag
Jens Bladt wrote:
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
E-TTL is Canon's primary flash system, introduced in 1998 and recently
updated to E-TTL 2 with the introduction of the 20d some 18 months ago
or so. It's a pre-flash based system, but not intrusive (unlike the
horrible A-TTL system Canon used
As you stated, the lens focuses just fine with an empty filter port. I
found no plain glass filter when purchased new. Would, also, seem
logical for such to have been referenced in the user's manual.(?)
The filters you mentioned may be UV/daylight.(?)
Jack
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And P-TTL does not cause shutter lag.
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I know is, that I'm not interested in using ANY preflash - at all.
It's bad enough, that the people I photograph must put up with
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do all the Software Updates. Things do get fixed in them... I login
to my Admin account once a week and apply any Software Updates
available. Haven't been any for a couple of weeks now.
My last one that i uploaded was about 10 days ago.I must
You can bounce P-TTL flash just as you would any other flash. The preflash is
barely noticed. It's insignificant.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I know is, that I'm not interested in using ANY
Similarly, the Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 FE includes a set of screw-in
filters that fit at the back of the lens. One must always be fitted
for the lens to achieve proper focusing and correction. This is
different from using a front-mounted filter that was not designed in
as part of the optical
On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:41 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Are you using automatic synching of your .Mac account iDisk or
synching calendars/address book, etc to .Mac? I've seen this
behavior most often when using the automatic iDisk synching
feature. The synching feature works well most of
Any reason i cannot access Mac help. I just get a blank box and
the spinning wheel.??I can access help in PS etc.I'm using an
always on dsl connection and Airport Express.
BTW: Adobe supplies their own Help Viewer application independent of
Mac OS X's Help Browser. They are not related
Guys and Gals,
Someone wants to use an image of mine for a t-shirt. The problem (?) is
that it's a portrait of a stranger and her child (about 1 year old) that I
took about 5 years ago while just walking through a local street fair.
I've contributed nature and animal photos before, put never
On 3/4/06, Jerome Reyes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Guys and Gals,
Someone wants to use an image of mine for a t-shirt. The problem (?) is
that it's a portrait of a stranger and her child (about 1 year old) that I
took about 5 years ago while just walking through a local street fair.
I've
For what it's worth, Paul, I only get a blank page of a piece of torn
paper.
(No links).
(I've got some features disabled as default, though: sounds, animations and
video.)
Lasse
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:19 PM
It depends on which country you are in. In general, you own the copyright
unless you have assigned it to someone else. On the other hand, some
countries such as France have privacy laws which might make it illegal to
publish the photo if the people are identifiable. Printing it on a t-shirt
would
-- Original message --
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what it's worth, Paul, I only get a blank page of a piece of torn
paper.
(No links).
H
(I've got some features disabled as default, though: sounds, animations and
video.)
In that
There's no such thing as the copyright. You own a copyright
in the image, based on the fact that you took it. But it's quite
possible for other people to have copyright interests in the shot
(as, for example, if it is a photograph of a copyrighted subject).
Plus, as you note, there's more than
Wow!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
cbwaters wrote:
T.V. having left us a while ago, I guess I feel the need to take over
his roll as chief Pentax equipment destroyer.
In today's
There are too things involved here. Legality and ethics. Legally you do
not have a leg to stand on. It would be a clear violation of the
subjects rights, if she chose to sue you she would get about anything
she asked for. Ethically, well, how would you feel if you saw some
stranger wearing a
I am not a copyright lawyer.
This position was stated at a recent exhibition sponsored by the Bay
Area Press Photographers Association... one of their more successful
local photographers who has sold such work broadly to both national
and international magazine publications for editorial
This is not a copyright issue. It would be considered a commercial (even
if the t-shirt was a one off) use of someone's image without permission.
This is a clear case where a model release would be needed to legally
use the photo that way. The only possible way around a release is if the
On Apr 3, 2006, at 13:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can bounce P-TTL flash just as you would any other flash. The
preflash is barely noticed. It's insignificant.
Except that it makes my daughter blink every time, so almost every
flash photo I take of her makes it look like she's half
I think Tom is right here. A t-shirt is commercial use, because the image is
being used to generate profit. Editorial use implies that the persons image is
used in the course of reporting events. Selling photos of people shot on the
street is probably a grey area.
Paul
-- Original
Today, thanks to the biggest Polish photo portal I had an opportunity
to be on official Polish presentation of Mamiya ZD - for these who
are not aware - 22 megapixel medium format DSLR ;-) The camera
appeared to be a very interesting tool for professional photographers
(with its price
Ok I will report in due time :)
On 4/3/06, Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
I thought someone else would have replied to this. I would like to know
the results.
I travel with a Fujitsu Lifebook P1120. It weighs 1 kg and takes very
little space, but is a bit slow.
Leon
. Here's one shot from the session,
with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
All comments appreciated.
Jostein
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Jerome Reyes wrote:
Someone wants to use an image of mine for a t-shirt. The problem
(?) is
that it's a portrait of a stranger and her child (about 1 year old)
that I
took about 5 years ago while just walking through a local street fair.
I've contributed nature
. Here's one shot from
the session, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the
background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
All comments appreciated.
Jostein
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
__
Do You Yahoo
My friend finally want to make the digital transition.
He currently owns a film PS (Pentax BTW), and I some
months ago I lent him my MZ-M, along with my AF
28-70/4 and a Cosina 135/2,8, so he can learn the
basics of SLR photography.
When he asked me, first we were discussing if a
'bridge'
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
Don't even think of doing it unless you want to risk the lady in
the picture owning your house and car.
Ok, bob and colin ... and anyone else who cares to respond. In your
considered opinions, this would put the photographer, publisher and
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Jostein wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
Very nice job.
Godfrey
, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
All comments appreciated.
Jostein
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
On 2006-04-03, at 23:04, Jostein wrote:
As Mike Wilson has already mentioned, we spent Saturday evening
strolling along the river Tyne. Here's one shot from the session,
with the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
No comments
Makes sense to me. I'm no lawyer either.
Thinking along these lines though, TV stations routinely shoot footage on
street corners, at public events., etc., of persons who have not given
explicit signed consent to be photographed. Nor have they given consent for
the footage to be aired.
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Reyes
Subject: copyrights
Guys and Gals,
Someone wants to use an image of mine for a t-shirt. The problem (?) is
that it's a portrait of a stranger and her child (about 1 year old) that I
took about 5 years ago while just walking through a local
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 April 2006 22:47
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: copyrights
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
Don't even think of doing it unless you want to risk the
lady in the
picture
As Mike Wilson has already mentioned, we spent Saturday evening
strolling along the river Tyne. Here's one shot from the session, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
All comments appreciated.
Jostein
Mail for you at your telia account.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
