I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
top to me - not much like dew. This one seems more natural. I'm not
sure if the square crop matters much, but overall, this is very nice.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 3, 2006, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote:
KW Check out
KW
Hello David,
There doesn't seem to be as much separation between the trees and sky
as I would like. Gives it a odd feel for me. One of these days, I'm
going to have to take a stab at this IR stuff - seems to be very
tricky to work with.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 3, 2006, 5:55:05
The colours and the technical aspects are just wonderful.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 4/3/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Mike Wilson has already mentioned, we spent Saturday evening
strolling along the river Tyne. Here's one shot from the session, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
top to me - not much like dew. This one seems more natural. I'm not
sure if the square crop matters much, but overall, this is very nice.
There's something not quite right about this picture (and the
Thanks a lot!
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Papug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: [OT] Mamiya ZD presentation
Today, thanks to the biggest Polish photo portal I had an opportunity
to be on official Polish
From: Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.- Is there any bridge digicam worth considering for
someone who likes photography but maybe have enough
with a performer 'ultra-zoom'? If so, which one?
http://www.tynebridgewebcam.com/webcams.htm
8-)
-
On 3/4/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would hinge on whether that someone had paid a premium for theT-Shirt
because of the picture.
If they had, the seller might have a problem.
It boils down to your right to likenesses of yourself, and someone elses
lack of right to make
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/04 Tue AM 06:31:54 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - A bug in the field - Take II
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like this one better. The first one, the dew really looked over the
top to me - not much like dew. This one
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/04 Tue AM 04:45:05 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO:
Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I try to open this picture/website, it launches some
Microsoft product like email and starts trying to install it. I
cancel out of it, but don't appreciate the attempt. Is this site
infected?
Strange indeed. Never noticed anything of that
I like this format better as the uninteresting bottom part of the
previous composition disappeared. With more attention on the strange
form of the flower in the background this picture is even more
fascinating.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
In the DSLR area, I of course let him use my Ds but I
have trouble recommending it for him hands down. Why?
He doesn't own legacy lenses as I did, so he can
choose with 'more freedom'.
The D50 is really cheap here, in Spain, even cheaper
than the DL, and available almost
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO:
Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You kinky Norwegian you.
VBG
Dave S
--
All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy. -
Spike Milligan
Hi all,
is there any direct comparison of Samsungs lenses with Schneider label and
the matchin Pentax original?
I wonder whether they are identical (apart from the labels).
Does SMC apply to both?
Is there any other difference?
Thanks,
Martin
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:33:30 +0100, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: copyrights
I guess that's why the courts exist... to redraw the legal line with
each and every case. :-)
They exist because we allow lawyers to become
On 2006-04-01 07:10, Mark Roberts wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
I go with the DX suggestion. Logical, sensible, sounds good. So will
Pentax use it?..
Nikon has registered DX as a trademark for their APS-C-sized series
of lenses and digital cameras. In fact, they generally refer to
On 2006-03-31 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Didn't we do this about a month ago??)
Yes:
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:45:11 +0100
Subject: what's the name of the new Pentax 10MP camera?
Jostein wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
Beautiful.
Malcolm
Nice shot. Well composed.
I had no trouble viewing it. No attempts to load any files. not even a
popup.
Paul
On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Ralf,
Every time I try to open this picture/website, it launches some
Microsoft product like email and starts trying to install it. I
If they're young and ambitious, they probably will change brands at least a
couple of times in their career anyway...:-)
I would recommend Pentax. Not because it's best, but because it's good enough.
If Jaume's friend likes the interface of the camera he/she borrowed from Jaume,
then go for
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I always recommend the Pentax DSLRs to anyone interested
in moving up to single lens reflex in digital photography. Inevitably
they are almost always hobbyists or well-heeled snapshooters. If they
are young and ambitious with a likelihood of a photographic
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Martin Trautmann wrote:
A DX trademark for Nikon cameras will be a killer. DiX sounds like Digital
Imaging / Dimage. Maybe they stick to *ist - *istDX
There will NOT be any ist in the name of the new camera.
Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum.
On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Dr Freud would have loved this. I just had to butt in! As Roman Polanski
might have said.
Op Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:25:57 +0200 schreef Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tim's gaffe was damaging,
Ass bad ass it gets...
but Doug's retort rectum.
On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I
Hi Ralf
A nice shot, I agree. I had as well no problems watching the photo.
grretings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:59 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - PESO: Cine Novelty
Nice shot. Well
Thanks for the comment Bruce.
It was a bit under exposed but i brought it up in Raw. I tried channel
mixer and a few others, but the whites just looked to blown out even
for IR.:-)
I remember reading about Calculations in Scotts book, and thought id
see what it produced.
It is tricky, for
Thanks for commenting Paul.
Sunday was a cloudless day around here. The sky could have used some
big fluffies i suppose. Coulda cloned some in if i was thinking.gI
was mainly trying to get a PS adjustment that was ir looking but not
blown out.
I think i need to do more net research.g
Dave
Not change # in headline.
This is as ugly, ass can be.
This list _is_ the dark side ;-)
Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects?
My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity
Tim,
I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely.
-Adam
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Not change # in headline.
This is as ugly, ass can be.
This list _is_ the dark side ;-)
Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects?
My spellchecker says no, but it is very
On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Don't even think of doing it unless you want to risk the lady in
the picture owning your house and car.
Ok, bob and colin ... and anyone else who cares to respond. In your
considered opinions, this would put the photographer, publisher
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Tom C wrote:
Makes sense to me. I'm no lawyer either.
Thinking along these lines though, TV stations routinely shoot
footage on street corners, at public events., etc., of persons who
have not given explicit signed consent to be photographed. Nor
have they
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:18:09 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Isle of Man Examiner, when informed of my show,. I
will assume that they know what they're doing with regard to liability
and releases.
If you assume that, you'd assume anything. :-)
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Tom C wrote:
It's likely a different scenario risk-wise, liability-wise, etc.,
depending on whether one T-shirt is sold or 100,000.
If a photographer makes, for sake of argument, $1000 on the
publication of an image, does their potential liability extend
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:20:05 +0100, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your maximun liability is everything you own and everything you earn for
the rest of your life. They can not legally attach your wife, kids, and
grandkids in the US (don't laugh, that has happened many times through
out
On 4/1/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter speed that show off the lens: f6.7 @ 1/180th.
This was going to be BW, but the skin tones, the dog's fur, and the
orange sweater changed my mind.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:45:46 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
It would hinge on whether that someone had paid a premium for theT-Shirt
because of the picture.
If they had, the seller might have a problem.
It boils down to your right to
One problem is that this is an international list and laws are
different in each country. For the sake of this discussion, we need
to limit it to the country in which the photograph was taken, I'm
assuming the USA.
In your case, Godfrey, the applicable law would be that of the Isle
of
On Apr 3, 2006, at 7:29 PM, graywolf wrote:
You could get someone in a lot of trouble with your logic there,
Bob. The law is not about logic, it is about how things are written
into law, and how the courts have ruled on it in the past. And you
are wrong about that photo on the front of a
Internet Explorer - probably 6.0
On 4/4/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I try to open this picture/website, it launches some
Microsoft product like email and starts trying to install it. I
cancel out of it, but don't
I prefer the first one. Much more striking.
Bob
On Apr 4, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Martin Trautmann wrote:
I wonder whether they are identical (apart from the labels).
Does SMC apply to both?
Is there any other difference?
The Samsung version smells like kim-chee.
Bob
Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Internet Explorer - probably 6.0
errr... well, then...
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6
How does 50mm macro lense DOF f/8 stand compared to 50mm lense f/8 with
12mm extension ring? Which expected to have greater DOF?
Thoughts?
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
Op Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:58:17 +0200 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So my spellchecker is smarter than me ;-)
That makes me? Very limited, or an ass/æs/ animal of horse family with
long
ears and a tuft of the end of its tail.
Ask for comments only in Norwegian on your next
Thanks Frank. Always happy to invoke a smile.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/1/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more from today's trip into town. Again, the FA 40/1.4. This time
at an ap and shutter
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear
On 4/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the downward look to the photo. He does not seem to happy here Frank.
BTW, no Pamela.??:-)
Thanks to everyone who commented. The print is much better looking
than the scan - he's not terribly sharp, but I find it much less
offensive
I think his grammatical use of the colon was correct.
On 4/4/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Doug Brewer wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/04 Tue PM 12:25:22 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: copyrights
One problem is that this is an international list and laws are
different in each country. For the sake of this discussion, we need
to limit it to the country
In Oxford advanced learner dictionary it is analects with one l. But, when
looking further down I now do find annals.
Even the limited spellchecker conform it.
So my spellchecker is smarter than me ;-)
That makes me? Very limited, or an ass/æs/ animal of horse family with long
ears and a tuft
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/04 Tue PM 12:55:27 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO:
Remake - Aristocrat in red)
In Oxford advanced learner dictionary it is analects with one l. But, when
looking
I would have thought that it's something like the red eye reduction pre
flash, which I find very annoying and time consuming (the shot is taken
quite a bit after I have pressed the button). I never use it for the same
reason - and it gives unnatural looking (small) pupils.
Regards
Jens Bladt
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Roman wrote:
How does 50mm macro lense DOF f/8 stand compared to 50mm lense f/8
with 12mm extension ring? Which expected to have greater DOF?
Thoughts?
Any 50mm lens will have the same DoF when focused with the same
amount of extension to achieve a given
I recommend Pentax to people quite often. Even to professionals whose
work, like mine, doesn't necessarily require the fastest, biggest
camera on the block. The lenses are excellent, the prices are
reasonable, the viewfinder is very very good, and the camera is
easily learned and very
Op Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:47:54 +0200 schreef Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How does 50mm macro lense DOF f/8 stand compared to 50mm lense f/8 with
12mm extension ring? Which expected to have greater DOF?
Impossible to tell :o)
Thoughts?
As far as I know, d.o.f. is dependent on the size of the
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
at least until we scrape bottom.
Guys, this is wholly
Note to myself:
Speaking of anals, I must let my blunder go ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL
Cotty wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
at least until we scrape bottom.
Guys, this is
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:25:22 +0100, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One problem is that this is an international list and laws are different
in each country. For the sake of this discussion, we need to limit it
to the country in which the photograph was taken, I'm assuming the USA.
In
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
at least until we scrape bottom.
Guys, this is wholly
Cotty wrote:
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
at least until we scrape bottom.
Guys, this is
On 4/3/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gorgeous! The curving line of the fence, the sturdy
posts in contrast to the delicate arc of the bridge,
the lighting, the colors... I like all of it!
I concur, for the same reasons given.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here?
If so, I nominate this one.
Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
Now we'll never hear the end of it.
at least until we scrape bottom.
Guys, this is wholly inappropriate.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Roman wrote:
How does 50mm macro lense DOF f/8 stand compared to 50mm lense f/8
with 12mm extension ring? Which expected to have greater DOF?
Thoughts?
Any 50mm lens will have the same DoF when focused with the same
amount of
Having used a Canon Rebel and a Nikon D70, and played with an istD for a
day or so, making the choice to go with a DS was a no brainer for me.
While a D would have been nice for a few of the features, those features
weren't worth doubling the price of the camera. I definitely wanted an
Thanks, Godfrey. I played a little more with it after reading your
message, and I think I understand it pretty well now.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The flash exposure compensation (FEC) control adjusts the total
amount of flash exposure in much the same way as the
More or less. It's just way faster. I don't think one can call that
lag. Maybe for some time critical shots but really, you don't feel any
lag.
On 4/4/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have thought that it's something like the red eye reduction pre
flash, which I find very
Bankrupcy does not discharge court ordered settlements, back taxes, or
federal school loans unless the law has changed since 1984.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John Forbes wrote:
On
To me, it looks more like one slightly longer flash, rather than a pre
burst and main flash as two separate bursts. However, some people are
prone to blinking and it is quite easy for them to get the eyelids
starting to close while the exposure is being made. I get way more
partially closed eyes
A little more rambling than I would have hoped for...
I was thinking about this last night after it was suggested I was morally
bereft...
I did a *little* research and came to a couple of conclusions... rightly or
wrongly.
1. It seems that, at least where I live, there is not really a
On Apr 4, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Tom C wrote:
Would his publishing the photograph violate the person's rights
regarding publicity? From what I've read this is a murkier area
than the invasion of privacy issue. OTOH, I can see this issue as
being easier to act on legally than that of privacy
It does in this jurisdiction, but I'm sure you're better informed on
American law.
John
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:33:57 +0100, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bankrupcy does not discharge court ordered settlements, back taxes, or
federal school loans unless the law has changed since 1984.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:55:01 +0100, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little more rambling than I would have hoped for...
I was thinking about this last night after it was suggested I was
morally bereft...
I did a *little* research and came to a couple of conclusions... rightly
or
It's probably the same lenses with a different label ;-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. april 2006 14:39
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: 1:1 comparison Schneider - Pentax
On Apr 4, 2006, at
Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up.
If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish
we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus.
For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-)
On 4/4/06, Cotty [EMAIL
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-)
Wow! That's some serious flatulence.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Red Eye Reduction purposely slows things down to give people's eyes time
to react, pre-flash for metering needs to occur as quickly as possible
to prevent movement from changing the needed exposure. Same technology,
applied in opposite manners.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
I would have
If you are not breaking the law, and not breaching somebody else's rights,
then there is no risk.
John
Breaking the law and breach of rights is only such when proven to be such.
The laws, at least here are written loosely enough for that to be the case.
One person may consider it a
Hi!
I'd recommend a Pentax in a heartbeat - in fact, I have on several
occasions. It's a good, solid camera to start with, and the range of
lenses available run from the downright cheap to very expensive, from old
screw mounts to the latest digital lenses. It just took a few days of
On 4/3/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Square makes a difference. It makes it square.
snip
Mark!!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 4/4/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer the first one. Much more striking.
I agree with Mr. Shell.
-frank, who's been way too busy at work these past to days to actually
type a reasoned critique (like I ever...), so I'm just scrolling down
to something that I agree with and,
Hi!
As Mike Wilson has already mentioned, we spent Saturday evening
strolling along the river Tyne. Here's one shot from the session, with
the blue arc of the Millenium Bridge in the background.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
Jostein, do tell me, what kind of comment you
Bob,
Internet Explorer - probably 6.0
Bob, I am regular poster to www.PhotoSight.ru. I hereby humbly suggest
you either install a web proxy application or use Mozilla FireFox...
With FireFox (and a proxy) I never had such a bad luck like you reported.
Thanks.
Boris
Hi!
Whatever that is to the bug's right is quite
distracting. I preferred the original composition.
I also prefer the original version.
Boris
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-)
Wow! That's some serious flatulence.
Yes, it may require an examination by some Pentax medical gear to find
the source.
--
Scott Loveless
On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-)
Wow! That's some serious flatulence.
That's funny coming from a wind bag like you.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:28:38 +0100, Perry Pellechia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up.
If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish
we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus.
For once I wish
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:45:26 +0100, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are not breaking the law, and not breaching somebody else's
rights, then there is no risk.
John
Breaking the law and breach of rights is only such when proven to be
such. The laws, at least here are written
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Jostein wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/20060403-0139.html
Beautiful.
Malcolm
I totally agree.
ERNR
I'd like to reply, but I think I'll pass.
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-)
Wow! That's some
Hi,
Any comments on the quality of the subject lens?
Shel
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I regularly reccommend Pentax, if its the camera they should be looking at.
My daughter likes her istD and her boyfriend uses it aswell.
I have always liked the Pentax bodies i have bought in the past, and
some of my glass is terrific.If its someone
On 4/3/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The old cinema at Ensival...
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1360317
...has since been demolished.
Beautifullly composed.
Lovely photo, very evocative.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Come on, stop farting around.
Scott Loveless wrote:
I'd like to reply, but I think I'll pass.
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For once I wish we could stop all
Shel,
It is a nice lens. Size, weight and handling is similar to the FA
50/1.7. Sharpness is very good. Auto focus is pretty fast. The
manual focusing ring is not great but it is OK.
Perry.
On 4/4/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Any comments on the quality of the subject
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
