ocrat tells the truth
Dumbocrat candidate JFK just slipped up and told the truth:
"I will double our special forces in order to conduct terrorist operations."
Thats what he said.
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not
consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos
Dumbocrat candidate JFK just slipped up and told the truth:
"I will double our special forces in order to conduct terrorist operations."
Thats what he said.
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not
consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos
didn't directly control.]
http://slate.msn.com/id/2103739/
chatterboxGossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics.
Gagging the Fuzz, Part 6
The Park Service formally terminates its truth-telling police chief.
By Timothy Noah
Posted Monday, July 12, 2004, at 5:47
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1208340,00.html
Truth, justice and corporate sway
Nomi Prins
Monday May 3, 2004
The Guardian
Mark
Twain once said: "We have a criminal jury system which is superior to any
in the world; and its efficiency is only marred b
The Truth About the Reagan Deficits
Washington Post
By Linda BilmesTuesday, February 10, 2004; Page A23
The Bush budget announced last week shows revenue falling some $500 billion short of projected spending. Is this a cause for alarm, or is it true that, as Vice President Cheney reportedly
NY Times, November 19, 2003
Mexico Dismisses Its U.N. Envoy for Critical Remark About U.S.
By TIM WEINER
MEXICO CITY, Nov. 18 — Mexico's ambassador to the United Nations has
been dismissed after saying the United States regards Mexico as a
second-class country, government officials said Tuesday.
Title: the Lynch truth is coming out...
from MS SLATE's summary of top US newspapers:
The Washington Post's top non-local story is a huge revisionist
piece on Pfc. Jessica Lynch's saga and concludes that the story
of her capture and rescue "is far more complex and diff
Guardian, Wednesday June 4, 2003
Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oil
George Wright
Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading
White House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those
opposed to the US-led war.
The US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who
Dear Michael:
How may one 'book' this tour - or elements of the tour - for Canadian
venues?
Hari
fight the hate, end the occupation
PALESTINE TRUTH TOUR 2003
First-hand reports from Palestine.
With speakers, video, photos, and more.
Will feature new video from the filmmaking collective Big Noise Films
(www.bignoisefilms.com) as well as speakers with eyewitness reports
from Palestine. The
From the newly published "Bush at War" by Bob Woodward:
"The president emerged wearing a New York Fire Department windbreaker.
He raised his arm and gave a thumbs-up to the crowd on the third base
side of the field. Probably 15,000 fans threw their arms in the air
imitating the motion. He then
> I am sure Michael will want this thread closed
> for content, as he did in November, but perhaps
> Max can clarify where the technical problem is.
>
> Chris Burford
Such things happen every now and then. Virus is definitely one
possibility, a very long and very slow trip with delays around
the
At 17/05/02 00:28 -0400, you wrote:
>Where the fuck did this come from? And why is it dated Nov 24 2002?
>
>Doug
The letter from Mark Jones quoted by Max was originally sent on Fri, 23 Nov
2001 16:04:31 +
Although Max sent a number of posts on this thread on 26 Nov I can find no
record o
I wrote to Max an hour ago trying to find out the origin of this. Mark
has not been here for some time.
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:28:18AM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Max Sawicky wrote:
>
> >MJ: "The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that
MJ: "The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
favour of US policy, that is, Henwood favours the policy of bombing Afghan
towns and cities, he favours the random and/or mass slaughter of Afghanis,
he favours the destruction of whate
her spending that is offset by revenues. If you applied
this
adjustment to *all* spending, you would get a total interest
obligation vastly in excess of the actual amount. In other
words, suppose total spending is $10, revenues are $8,
and aid to Israel is $1. In truth, only $2 is added to debt,
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 14:19:35 -0400
From: John Lacny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [It's No Accident] The Consequences of Telling the Truth
About Palestine
To: "It's No Accident" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A Special Announcment from It's No Accident, April 9, 20
BIN LADEN: THE FORBIDDEN TRUTH ABOUT BUSH, OIL AND WASHINGTON'S SECRET
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE TALIBAN
At Democracy Now! we have often called the Bush administration the
Oiligarchy. Vice-President Dick Cheney of course was the president of
Halliburton, a company that provides services fo
Max tells the "truth"
by Max Sawicky
26 November 2001
Selective pacifism reflects confusion.
Consistent pacifism is not confused; it's just wrong.
%
CB: If you are not a selective pacifist and not a consistent pacificist, does this
mean you are in some sense against pe
wives and at least as many mistresses.
Binary thinking is a Western mental disorder.
-Original Message-
From: Max Sawicky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:19949] RE: Max tells the "truth"
ceived ---
From: Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:59:44 -0800
Subject: [PEN-L:19957] Re: RE: Re: Max tells the "truth"
Max Sawicky wrote:
> Selective pacifism reflects confusion.
> Consistent pacifism is not confused; it's just wrong.
>
where is the confusion? if i state a theory and explicitly specify the
outliers, would you call that confused? if i were to say "i am a pacifist
in the sense that i oppose all
- Original Message -
From: "Max Sawicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:58 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:19987] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: Max tells the "truth"
> Selective pacifism reflects confusion.
> Consiste
Selective pacifism reflects confusion.
Consistent pacifism is not confused; it's just wrong.
mbs
t I will settle for simple
confusion,
> borne of excessive exposure to bad propaganda.
> mbs
===
Ghandi was confused? MLK?.
Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Max Sawicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now things are really getting nasty. Bad writing. Hmmmph.
> No, a selective pacifist is one who professes universal
principles --
> opposition to any use of organized violence -- but applies them to
> fewer than all wars.
Doug tells the truth..
by Doug Henwood
(((
CB: Doug, if imperialism/globalization is not the main cause of terrorism, what is the
cause of terrorism ?
(((
But are
> things really that simple? Latin America and East> Asia, two of the
> reg
CC: First a couple of minor points. (1) I think it best to keep the word
"pacifist" to name those who oppose any and all war under all
conditions. In this sense Max's term, "selective pacifist," is simple
bad writing. Is there anyone who has ever approved of all wars? Gee. . . .
Now things are r
"Devine, James" wrote:
>
>
>
> BTW, in terms of strategy & tactics, I'm a pacifist. I don't think that the
> left should engage in violence unless it's absolutely necessary. Further, it
> might be okay it's done in a way to promote grass-roots democracy and
> popular power. The latter is real
jd again:
. . . It depends on whether Lenin were leading a workers' democratic
government or
not and acted according to the principles of workers' democracy. If he were
a dictator of the proletariat rather than being subject to the democratic
will of the proletariat, he could easily be as bad as B
mbs: > ... The selectivity [of pacifism] derives from a variation of
"within the revolution everything/against the revolution, nothing." There is
purportedly some threshold of righteousness that excuses uses of force
resulting in non-trivial levels of atrocity (death of innocents, etc.), and
belo
First of all, this sort of exchange has no place here.
Second, this particular debate seems to involve Max vs. the others. When
we reach that stage, especially when it becomes repetitive, it is time to
stop.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:51:00AM -0500, Max Sawicky wrote:
> then why write to me?
>
Wierd, my wife told me the same thing last night.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:14:42PM -0500, Max Sawicky wrote:
> You are all morally confused and locked into pamphlet time warp ("war
> credits"!). But you are not vile. Perelman's mung bean casserole is vile.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Depar
rritory.
There
isn't sufficient reason not to apply that logic to the U.S. v. taliban/al
qaida.
You are all morally confused and locked into pamphlet time warp ("war
credits"!). But you are not vile. Perelman's mung bean casserole is vile.
yrs in truth,
mbs
then why write to me?
Sorry Max but I have found your attitude beyond the pale or reasonable
discourse.
Greg Schofield
Perth Australia
but I have found your attitude beyond the pale or reasonable discourse.
Greg Schofield
Perth Australia
--- Message Received ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:51:50 +
Subject: [PEN-L:19923] Max tells the "truth"
[was: RE:[PEN-L:19912] RE:
[was: RE:[PEN-L:19912] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Doug tells
thetruth..]
Max Sawicki writes: >Now let us all bow our heads in a moment of silence over the
impending demise of several thousand fascist, anti-semitic, misogynist terrorists.
(One suspects they are not down wi
I think that we can drop the title of this thread.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps we are talking at cross-purposes here. Doug, Steve, Joan
>> Robinson, etc. are saying that under capitalism it's better to be
>> employed than unemployed; Ali, Paul, etc. are saying that capitalism
>> on the periphery is very much worse than other modes of production &
>> especia
Christian writes:>To be "unemployed" is to be within capital's orbit (ie it's a
distinction that applies to populations constructed statistically by nation-states and
super-national bodies.) Robinson is saying that being outside of that orbit is far
worse than being in it. That is, even unemploy
>
> Perhaps we are talking at cross-purposes here. Doug, Steve, Joan
> Robinson, etc. are saying that under capitalism it's better to be
> employed than unemployed; Ali, Paul, etc. are saying that capitalism
> on the periphery is very much worse than other modes of production &
> especially so wh
Doug went into more detail in LBO, but Stephen, you should not pile onto
the flames by attacking Mark.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:12:22AM -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
>
> --Wierd, on other lists I've not seen any evidence of this. He's
> challenged the likes of Leo Casey on LBO and Soc. Regis
Mark in the apoplectic mode contends:
"The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
favour of US policy, that is, Henwood favours the policy of bombing Afghan
towns and cities, he favours the random and/or mass slaughter of Afghanis,
he f
>
>When assessing 'the truth' of Henwood's politics, let us begin with this
>obvious fact -- the man is simply a craven apologist for exterminism, for
>US imperialism in its newest and most lethal guise.
>
>
Oh, he's worse than that. He's a running
Doug seems to suggest that since Afghan. has been relatively untouched by
globalization, the link between terror and globalization has yet to be
proved.
Of course, I have not heard of any Afghani terrorists; supposedly many of
the hijackers on S 11 were from Saudi Arabia.
--
Michael Perelman
Ec
whoa, Mark. Rather than characterize Doug as a craven apologist, let him
elaborate if he wants to do so.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
favour of US policy, that is, Henwood favours the policy of bombing Afghan
towns and cities, he favours the random and/or mass slaughter of Afghanis,
he favours the destruction of whate
ploited by
capitalists is
nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited
at all.") These
facts complicate the simple derivation of terrorism
from
globalization."
Isn't this too economoizing, ie reductionist, and
therefore economizing with the truth. Waht is this
hang up with th
At 22/11/01 23:18 -0800, you wrote:
>< http://www.thenation.com >
>FEATURE STORY | Special Report
>
>Terrorism and Globalization
>by DOUG HENWOOD
Doug's ability to "doubt everything" serves him well in this journalistic
article which for the audience, may be more creative than coming up with
p
< http://www.thenation.com >
FEATURE STORY | Special Report
Terrorism and Globalization
by DOUG HENWOOD
The organizers of the Globalization and Resistance Conference, held at
the City University of New York's Graduate Center on November 16 and
17, had a very bad stroke of luck. They started pl
Thanks a lot for the gesture, and to Michael also. I will be on my way soon,
hounded off the list--nope, I am never hounded, I am done for the nonce.
Doesn't matter. This kind of hostility wears off. I must remember just how
hard it is to really deal with issues of ideology and evolution.
I hop
> >So, what's to be done, practically speaking? Work within the
>>Colombia Action Network or get a FARC solidarity group going if you
>>can?
>>
>>Yoshie
>
>Little confused by your question. The CAN, while not exactly a FARC
>solidarity group (this might land you in jail), is about as close as yo
>So, what's to be done, practically speaking? Work within the
>Colombia Action Network or get a FARC solidarity group going if you
>can?
>
>Yoshie
Little confused by your question. The CAN, while not exactly a FARC
solidarity group (this might land you in jail), is about as close as you
can co
>Max:
>>Opposing U.S. intervention does not depend on solidarity
>>with the FARC or anyone else. Presumably most people
>>here who opposed NATO in the Balkans were not practising
>>solidarity w/Milo.
>
>Actually, the same divide that existed with respect to US intervention in
>Yugoslavia exists w
Max:
>Opposing U.S. intervention does not depend on solidarity
>with the FARC or anyone else. Presumably most people
>here who opposed NATO in the Balkans were not practising
>solidarity w/Milo.
Actually, the same divide that existed with respect to US intervention in
Yugoslavia exists with resp
> I fail to see a need for any position on this more
> finely articulated than U.S. out of Colombia,
> hands off, get the fuck out, period. Anyone left
> on the ground in Colombia obviously has more
> a more complicated life. It's not clear they
> need our advice.
Onya, Max! Sledgehammer-simpl
At 08:00 PM 06/03/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Opposing U.S. intervention does not depend on solidarity
>with the FARC or anyone else. Presumably most people
>here who opposed NATO in the Balkans were not practising
>solidarity w/Milo.
damn straight. It's important to avoid the "enemy of my enemy is
Nathan, I should have added that I know that you were not the first to
mention Kosovo, but I would hate to see us go over that again unless
someone had something new to add.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:45:26PM -0400, Nathan Newman wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Perelman" <[
I was never an enthusiastic supporter of Milosevic, but the U.S. never
opposed anybody because of human rights violations -- they only run into
trouble if they inconvenience the U.S.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:45:26PM -0400, Nathan Newman wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Per
Nathan:
>The comparison to Kosovo is a bit off, since while various groups may have
>warmer or cooler attitudes towards the FARC itself, the more interesting
>comparison is to attitudes towards the KLA, which like the FARC was the
>rebel movement involved there. Many folks (including Lou) happily
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Nathan, the KLA were like the FARC only if you see the Serbians as the bad
>guys. We went over that fight already.
I wasn't the one making the original comparison between Columbia and Kosovo,
but even most of those who
Nathan, the KLA were like the FARC only if you see the Serbians as the bad
guys. We went over that fight already.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:09:45PM -0400, Nathan Newman wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Actually, the same divide that existed
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:11 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:12681] Re: RE: Re: The Truth Will Set You Free
Max:
>Opposing U.S. intervention does not depend on solidarity
>
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Actually, the same divide that existed with respect to US intervention in
>Yugoslavia exists with respect to the impending war in Colombia. Nation
>Magazine liberals, Z Magazine and the like opposed Nato's military actions
>b
Max wrote:
>There is also the small matter of the truth of
>what is happening. Efforts to obscure this do
>not uphold the credibility of the speaker, assuming
>they have any credibility to begin with.
>Acknowledgement of whatever crimes the FARC
>et al. are guilty of would st
Max:
>Opposing U.S. intervention does not depend on solidarity
>with the FARC or anyone else. Presumably most people
>here who opposed NATO in the Balkans were not practising
>solidarity w/Milo.
Actually, the same divide that existed with respect to US intervention in
Yugoslavia exists with resp
I am sorry if I gave you the impression that I want to paper over problems
with the FARC. I only said that I thought that we don't have to bother
with anti-FARC stuff here.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:00:28PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote:
> Max wrote:
> >There is also the small matte
Please Steve, cool it.
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:34:59AM -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
> > Michael wrote:
> > >I hope that my double standard is clear. I know that the US has the
> > >capacity to manufacture atrocities as well as to cover them up.
I just added you to the Marxism list. If you want to start a flame war, you
can do it over there instead of provoking me on PEN-L.
At 11:34 AM 6/3/01 -1000, you wrote:
>On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>> Michael wrote:
>> >I hope that my double standard is clear. I know that the US h
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Louis Proyect wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> >I hope that my double standard is clear. I know that the US has the
> >capacity to manufacture atrocities as well as to cover them up.
> >
> >Raymond Bonner got punished for trying to describe inconvenient
> >atrocities; others get rew
e FARC, Colombia would be even more of a
graveyard for peasants than it is now. Between the death squads and the
cops and army, the only protection a peasant has is a FARC combatant. That
is what is so disgusting about the Washington Post article. It ellides this
important truth. Without the FARC, C
loys atrocity reports can hardly
> hope to delegitimize reports consistent with a
> contrary political view.
>
> There is also the small matter of the truth of
> what is happening. Efforts to obscure this do
> not uphold the credibility of the speaker, assuming
&g
Max wrote:
>There is also the small matter of the truth of
>what is happening. Efforts to obscure this do
>not uphold the credibility of the speaker, assuming
>they have any credibility to begin with.
>Acknowledgement of whatever crimes the FARC
>et al. are guilty of would st
reports consistent with a
contrary political view.
There is also the small matter of the truth of
what is happening. Efforts to obscure this do
not uphold the credibility of the speaker, assuming
they have any credibility to begin with.
Acknowledgement of whatever crimes the FARC
et al. are
If truth is whole, Hegelian truth would do well to be studied in the context
of the whole of German philosophy, if not world philosophy. The sudden
re-start, in medias res, in the wake of Kant and the mysterious decade of the
1790's as Kant's system is a) transcended b) plundered of
In a message dated 6/2/2001 1:57:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hegel is definitely a believer in conflict. He dared to undertake a
consummation of Philosophy, Western and Eastern. He embraced the
resulting conflict despite finding it disturbing. Maybe his search for
the
As I recall, Thrasymachus says that justiice is the interest of the stronger
not the right of the stronger. Why would you read it as a statement about
the right of the peasantry and artisans to participate in politics. Surely
Thrasymachus did not take them as the stronger. Thrasymachus and Protago
In a message dated 6/2/2001 1:57:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hegel is definitely a believer in conflict. He dared to undertake a
consummation of Philosophy, Western and Eastern. He embraced the
resulting conflict despite finding it disturbing. Maybe his search for
the
ion:
>
>"The True is the whole. But the whole is only the [being / creature /
>nature / essence] fulfilling itself through its development. It should be
>said of the Absolute that it is essentially result, that it is not what it
>is in truth until the end; and this is pre
Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > > What is the whole? How could we possibly test/verify/falsify Hegel's
> > > assertion [that the truth -- or the true -- is the whole]?
>
> I liked Carrol's answer, but I have my own. Hegel's assertion is more a way
>
> > What is the whole? How could we possibly test/verify/falsify Hegel's
> > assertion [that the truth -- or the true -- is the whole]?
I liked Carrol's answer, but I have my own. Hegel's assertion is more a way
of testing/verifying/falsifying theories than
Ian Murray wrote:
>
> >LARGE CLIP]
>
> What is the whole? How could we possibly test/verify/falsify Hegel's
> assertion? It was Protagoras who said "man is the measure..."
>
There are multiple answers to this. One is that you can't not believe
it. You see the line you are now rea
only the [being / creature /
nature / essence] fulfilling itself through its development. It should be
said of the Absolute that it is essentially result, that it is not what it
is in truth until the end; and this is precisely what its nature to be
[actual / real (thing)], subject, or [self-realisati
. .
Hence, it is all continuous. . . . "
The writing style gives it away as the ancient Greek, but otherwise it
would pass for the crusty Teuton. (At least his precursor.) We're sent
on a journey from questions of existence to those of ethics, choice,
change, and ultimately, we return to the t
-being. Reality is a whole, or plenum,
probably spherical. The truth is the whole or the One but there are no holes
in it! It is certainly not the Absolute Mind or Whatever...it just is or
BE's .to say anything else gets you into the realm of opinion...
Cheers, Ken Hanly
> Actually,
> (Coming in on this thread late, here, sorry, just got back on the
list this
> morning)
>
> >"Die Wahrheit ist die Ganze" will translate as "The truth is the
whole." I
> >am pretty sure that is how Miller does it. --jks
>
>
> Actually, Hegel&#
(Coming in on this thread late, here, sorry, just got back on the list this
morning)
>"Die Wahrheit ist die Ganze" will translate as "The truth is the whole." I
>am pretty sure that is how Miller does it. --jks
Actually, Hegel's phrase is "Das Wahre ist d
- Original Message -
From: Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation
>emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is
>rather a constantly changing process, with which it
Jim Devine wrote:
>
> At 11:19 AM 05/30/2001 +0300, you wrote:
> >Jim Devine writes:
> >
> >As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
> >
> >=
> >
> >According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read &q
At 12:46 PM 5/30/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Keaney Michael wrote:
>
>>Jim Devine writes:
>>
>>As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
>>
>>=
>>
>>According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the t
Keaney Michael wrote:
>Jim Devine writes:
>
>As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
>
>=
>
>According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the true is the
>whole".
And of course Adorno said "the whole is the false."
Doug
Well, according to Tim Horton's "the hole is the Timbit."
>Jim Devine writes:
>
>As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
>
>=
>
>According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the true is the
>whole".
>
>Michael K.
Tom Walker
Bowen Island, BC
604 947 2213
"Die Wahrheit ist die Ganze" will translate as "The truth is the whole." I
am pretty sure that is how Miller does it. --jks
>
>At 11:19 AM 05/30/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>>Jim Devine writes:
>>
>>As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the t
At 11:19 AM 05/30/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>Jim Devine writes:
>
>As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
>
>=
>
>According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the true is the
>whole".
>
>Michael K.
does
Carrol asks:
How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation
emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is
rather a constantly changing process, with which it is possible (more or
less) to align the mind, but that alignment will
How do you interpret this distinction? A guess: Diesing's translation
emphasizes that "the truth" as a static entity does not exist but is
rather a constantly changing process, with which it is possible (more or
less) to align the mind, but that alignment will be more or less unt
Jim Devine writes:
As Baran & Sweezy quote Hegel to say, "the truth is the whole."
=
According to Paul Diesing, this should actually read "the true is the
whole".
Michael K.
Justin:
>In a message dated 10/8/00 4:52:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< I have never said that Milosevic is a
> proponent of socialism
>
>I am relieved; I thought you were losing it. One could have got that
>impression.
Why so? I don't think anyone who has read my
K
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
on 17/3/00 2:14 pm, Doug Henwood at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Keaney wrote:
>
>> And speaking of questionable friends, among those rallying to the support of
>> LM, or at the very least taking Guardian journ
Michael Keaney wrote:
>And speaking of questionable friends, among those rallying to the support of
>LM, or at the very least taking Guardian journalist Ed Vulliamy to task for
>attacking LM's defence of actions committed in the name of the Serbs, is no
>less than Alfred Sherman,
Who?
> as a p
d I been so "compelled" I would have been as enthusiastic a supporter of
the NATO bombing campaign -- something I was most certainly not. And
questioning the motives behind LM, its raison d'etre, is a valid pursuit.
> In reality, supporters of Western imperialism
> &
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
