I think TEN needs an application that scans your library for unanalyzed
tracks. The application would then have to analyse (and/or upload) the
track (or track values/IDs) to TEN so they can be included in your smart
mixes. I don't think this is a feature that should be included in the
Smart Mix pl
Would it be an option to upload unrecognized tracks and let their
analyzer handle them ?
I wouldn't want to do this without the user's knowledge. And then we open
up a whole new can of worms imho. New UI would be required, bandwidth
throttling, binaries for all kind of platforms are required
I think TEN needs an application that scans your library for unanalyzed
tracks. The application would then have to analyse (and/or upload) the
track (or track values/IDs) to TEN so they can be included in your smart
mixes. I don't think this is a feature that should be included in the
Smart Mix pl
mherger wrote:
>
>
> > creating mixes from my own library only. I notice that 11,252 of the
> > songs show up as unrecognized tracks according to the smartmix plugin
>
> Heh... adding the logging option was kind of shocking for me too! Yes,
>
> recognition based on metadata only leaves a lot
mherger wrote:
> > 1) Is there a way to know which songs in your collection (I have
> around
> > 8+ local songs) can be used / are recognized by EchoNest or not?
>
> No reasonable way to do this in an interactive way for this size
> collection: there's no way to tell the API to "get me tra
At home to check now. And with 7.7.2 running on linux (and all plugins
up to date), I'm now seeing 0kbps on all internet radio stations I've
tried, pandora, etc. With my own music, I'm seeing correct bit rate
reported.
Do you remember what plugin version you were using before?
--
Michael
_
I assume that webpage is what folks are calling "the Blender"?
Correct.
I Can also select a song and it gives me the options of track
mix or artist mix, along with the smart mix options (although I seem to
have to right click on a song WITHIN the smartmix playlist to get the
SMART MIX OPTIONS.
mikk64 wrote:
> this is the zip of the last scan i did...
> the number is getting lower and lower...i don't know why...
> this time is 22 of 235122...
I'm running out of ideas... that scan seems to end within the log
statement without any traces at all. Would the scan work with all
logging t
At home to check now. And with 7.7.2 running on linux (and all plugins
up to date), I'm now seeing 0kbps on all internet radio stations I've
tried, pandora, etc. With my own music, I'm seeing correct bit rate
reported.
gary
mherger wrote:
> > If I create a dynamic playlist from a reciepe some songs are
> repeating
> > after a short while up to several times. If I create a static
> playlist
> > (same reciepe) everything works fine. Is there a possibility to avoid
> > repeating songs?
>
> This shouldn't happen. Are y
garym wrote:
> New Smartmix user report (and thanks for this plugin). Just installed
> today (v.096) on my work machine (win7(64) running 7.7.2 and player is
> SqueezePlay. Only added about 5 minutes to my scan of about 70k files.
>
> Discovering files/directories: E:\All Music Files (77521 of
New Smartmix user report (and thanks for this plugin). Just installed
today (v.096) on my work machine (win7(64) running 7.7.2 and player is
SqueezePlay. Only added about 5 minutes to my scan of about 70k files.
Discovering files/directories: E:\All Music Files (77521 of 77521)
Complete 00:0
slartibartfast wrote:
>
> Firstly the profile export always seems to end prematurely missing about
> 2000 tracks out of 24000. This is accompanied by a message that the scan
> has ended unexpectedly.
> Secondly every "new and changed scan" seems to perform a full profile
> export of every track
First of all, thanks for releasing this plugin. I've been developing a
plugin for integrating EchoNest myself, but with a rather different
approach (focusing on catalog radio playlists, and using taste profiles
as seeds), so it will be interesting to compare the results.
A couple of points:
- O
I have to say this is an excellent replacement for MusicIP particularly
since MusicIP doesn't work on my squeezeplug. Only two things bother me
at the moment.
Firstly the profile export always seems to end prematurely missing about
2000 tracks out of 24000. This is accompanied by a message that th
Triode wrote:
> Can you get no debug output running ./spotifydnoflac in the same
> directory as it and libspotify.so - without knowing what is wrong
> there's little that can be done to resolve. As its an arm it should be
> able to run those binaries as long as it supports the soft float ABI?
>
JohnHansen wrote:
> Looking back in the thread, it seems that others have reported similar
> behavior before. For instance, here:
>
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?79706-Announce-Spotify-Premium-Plugin-(Beta)&p=726857&viewfull=1#post726857
> http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthrea
JohnHansen wrote:
> I just updated the Spotify plugin to 2.2.10 (from 2.2.7). I have LMS
> 7.7.2 from Squeezeplug on a Goflex Net.
>
> I noticed that when browsing certain artists in Spotify the Spotifyd
> process spins into using much memory! It actually slows down the whole
> server and you ne
jezbo wrote:
> NB. Don't get too attached to the pivotviewer feature, it was only ever
> experimental and it may have to be shelved since I think it's too
> demanding on resources - how does it perform for 7000+ albums?
Believe me, the Pivot table performs remarkably well - in fact as
dynamic, i
jezbo wrote:
> Indeed, the CD insert appearance was what I was going for, with tracks
> grouped by work (via Group Heading) with a nice title above, and the
> track-listing also divided by disks if the meta-data includes this. If
> you input Group Header in Muso it doesn't get stored anywhere els
Hello,
Just installed picture gallery. I can view the images on a client, ipeng
for example.
But in the web interface, running from squeezeserver on a synology 412+,
I get a blank page.
So extras->Picture Gallery
These are the errors in the log files
[13-01-03 12:14:36.0496] Slim::Utils::Timer
MDE wrote:
> I have just been spending a bit more time getting to learn how to use
> Muso. For classical music fans, it really is the best (Windows) software
> I've seen. For the first time in a long time, a piece of software made
> me laugh (with joy) when I discovered the "group tracks" feature
Just wanted to say thanks for a great plugin. Very useful.
sutty81's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58392
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97668
___
I have just been spending a bit more time getting to learn how to use
Muso. For classical music fans, it really is the best (Windows) software
I've seen. For the first time in a long time, a piece of software made
me laugh (with joy) when I discovered the "group tracks" feature. Having
ripped a lo
mherger wrote:
> 0.96 should fix this issue. Thanks!
>
It has. Thanks Michael - this is a really useful plugin. It's already
becoming one of the most used features in my setup.
Chris
chill's Profile: http://forums.sli
0.96 should fix this issue. Thanks!
--
Michael
___
plugins mailing list
plugins@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
mherger wrote:
> No. What LMS version are you running?
>
Logitech Media Server Version: 7.8.0 - 1350572233 @ Do 1 Nov 2012
21:41:09 CET
Mac OS X 10.6.8
chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=108
[13-01-03 10:09:41.7032] main::main (327) Error: Failed when running
main scan: [Can't call method "playcount" on an undefined value at
/Users/Chris/Library/Caches/Squeezebox/InstalledPlugins/Plugins/SmartMix/Importer.pm
line 88.
Ok, I'll need to add one more sanity check.
I don't use E
mherger wrote:
> > Excellent! I look forward to the bug-fix that will allow me to use
> your
> > plug-in with Rhapsody.
>
> 0.95 is on its way to your LMS. Please give it another try!
>
> - should fix issue mixing Rhapsody/Napster content
> - added button to reset default recipes to their "fact
I just installed 0.95, rescanned, and created a "Jazz" mix with The
Blender.
Good to hear it's working for you, too! Would you mind to share your
recipe?
--
Michael
___
plugins mailing list
plugins@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.co
mherger wrote:
> > Excellent! I look forward to the bug-fix that will allow me to use
> your
> > plug-in with Rhapsody.
>
> 0.95 is on its way to your LMS. Please give it another try!
>
> - should fix issue mixing Rhapsody/Napster content
> - added button to reset default recipes to their "fact
mherger wrote:
> >> I opened the "Let's dance" recipe and changed song hotness to 0,1,
> saved
> >> it, got the Information window (see below), close everything. Opend
> the
> >> recipe again and the song hotness is back to 0.
>
> Good news: the fix doesn't require a plugin update. Should be goo
Unfortunately the music industry hasn't understood that things like this
would get us to buy more music not less, so they tend to charge anyone
that want to show information like this a lot so it's almost impossible
to do without some kind of commercial agreement or violating the
licenses/copyrigh
Regarding rescans, is a full rescan required or is it enough to trigger
a new/changed rescan ?
New/changed is good enough.
--
Michael
___
plugins mailing list
plugins@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
mherger wrote:
> >> Please note that these numbers are _not_ updated between scans.
> >>
> > Does this mean that the play counts and ratings are uploaded once and
> > never changed again ?
>
> Once after every rescan, yes. And when you play a dynamic mix. I know
> this
> is not accurate. But t
I opened the "Let's dance" recipe and changed song hotness to 0,1, saved
it, got the Information window (see below), close everything. Opend the
recipe again and the song hotness is back to 0.
Good news: the fix doesn't require a plugin update. Should be good
already. Make sure you fully reloa
Hi,
Spotify has this very cool addon called The Complete Collection, which
essentially is complete CD-booklets browsable (and of course playable)
through their client. Something like this would be infinitely cool and
useful to have in the Squeezebox-system. I couldnt find any info, but
I'm guessi
Please note that these numbers are _not_ updated between scans.
Does this mean that the play counts and ratings are uploaded once and
never changed again ?
Once after every rescan, yes. And when you play a dynamic mix. I know this
is not accurate. But then I assume it's only a small part of
mherger wrote:
>
> - added support for play counts and ratings: if respective values are
> available in LMS, they're submitted to TEN to further tweak the mixes.
>
> Please note that these numbers are _not_ updated between scans.
>
Does this mean that the play counts and ratings are uploade
I opened the "Let's dance" recipe and changed song hotness to 0,1, saved
it, got the Information window (see below), close everything. Opend the
recipe again and the song hotness is back to 0.
Oops... I just released 0.95, and am able to reproduce your issue. Stay
tuned for another update. Tha
Excellent! I look forward to the bug-fix that will allow me to use your
plug-in with Rhapsody.
0.95 is on its way to your LMS. Please give it another try!
- should fix issue mixing Rhapsody/Napster content
- added button to reset default recipes to their "factory" values
- added support for pla
mherger wrote:
> > If I change any of the sliders and save Recipe the change is not
> where
> > the next time I open the Recipe. Changes on Style , Mood etc are
> saved.
>
> Would it work for the "let's dance" recipe? It does for me.
>
> Could you send me your recipe, so I can try to reproduce?
1) Is there a way to know which songs in your collection (I have around
8+ local songs) can be used / are recognized by EchoNest or not?
The plugin actually does this task to get rid of removed tracks. But to
protect users from the rate limit the process is seriously throttled
(max. 6 re
43 matches
Mail list logo
