On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution came
from ?
(Nope, not Greece)
A+
jml
O la la! Peut etre la democracie?
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
A+
jml
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution came
from ?
(Nope, not Greece)
A+
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution came
from ?
(Nope, not Greece)
A+
jml
O la la! Peut etre la democracie?
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
A+
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
Please don't confuse Liberty, Equality, Fraternity with Life, Liberty and the
Pursue of Happiness. One is collective and the other is individual! Sort of
like the difference between socialism and capitalism. Under socialism,
everyone is free to be like everyone
Our form started around the time of the Magna Carta followed up by some of
the most brilliant minds we were lucky to have: Jefferson, Franklin,
Washington, and many others. They spent months (years?) arguing and thinking
about what our form of government should be.
- Original Message -
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Nicholas Geti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our form started around the time of the Magna Carta followed up by some of
the most brilliant minds we were lucky to have: Jefferson, Franklin,
Washington, and many others. They spent months (years?) arguing and thinking
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution
came from ?
(Nope,
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Nicholas Geti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our form started around the time of the Magna Carta followed up by some of
the most brilliant minds we were lucky to have: Jefferson, Franklin,
Washington, and many others. They spent months (years?)
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Nicholas Geti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way only the Greek elite enjoyed a form of democracy. The rest were
slaves.
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution came from ?
(Nope, not Greece)
A+
jml
Man, you have a major hard-on about America. As the Economist magazine says,
the Anti-American complainers are like the teenagers who bitch about their
parents while enjoying free room and board from them
By the way only the Greek elite enjoyed a form of democracy. The rest were
slaves.
Nicholas Geti wrote:
Man, you have a major hard-on about America.
You mean you think USA is a bitch?
Don't worry, I keep telling you, just keep your feet on your own plate
and we won't spare a thought about you.
As the Economist magazine says,
the Anti-American complainers are like the
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Nicholas Geti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way only the Greek elite enjoyed a form of democracy. The rest were
slaves.
Sure, but eh any idea where the inspiration for your constitution came from ?
(Nope, not Greece)
A+
jml
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are right Leland, I apologize. You just where the proverbial last
drop. I can see you don't know better but the way you speak is sometimes
annoying to the rest of the world. You say America when you refer to a
country
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are right Leland, I apologize. You just where the proverbial last
drop. I can see you don't know better but the way you speak is sometimes
annoying to the rest of the world. You say America when
What a wordsmith you are.
--- Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Araoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are right Leland, I apologize. You just where
the proverbial last
drop. I can see you don't know better but the way
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name,
I'd love for a law to be enacted that would prohibit drug companies from
advertising. Do you ever wonder how much money is thrown away at the TV
advertising scum?
I agree with you in principle, but we have this thing called free speech.
Although McCain-Feingold took away some of that with
Uncle Sam has paid retributions to those American she wrongfully
imprisoned in concentration camps during WWII, which is an admission of
guilt by inference from actions the USA took to make amends to those she
had injured.
It was wrong because they were here legally and many were US
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many people who were classified as enemy combatant and place in the
Guantanamo interment camp have been there for years and under the
current patriot act
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many people who were classified as enemy combatant and place in the
Guantanamo interment camp have been there for years and under the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many people who were classified as enemy combatant and place in the
Guantanamo interment camp have been
On Saturday 05 April 2008 19:34, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Why not use the traditional criminal justice system to determine guilt.
Hi Leland!
Because these are not traditional criminals, to begin with. They bore arms
against the United States, were captured in so doing but they were by no
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many people who were classified as enemy combatant and place in the
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008 19:34, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Why not use the traditional criminal justice system to determine guilt.
Hi Leland!
Because these are not traditional criminals, to begin with. They bore arms
against the United States, were
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland wrote:
A rose by any other name is still a rose, and a concentration camp by
any other name, (eg interment camp), is still a concentration camp.
Many people who were classified as
On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:41, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Because these are not traditional criminals, to begin with. They bore
arms against the United States, were captured in so doing but they were
by no means part of an army - no uniforms and no traditional chain of
command
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2008 20:41, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Because these are not traditional criminals, to begin with. They bore
arms against the United States, were captured in so doing but they were
by no means part of an army - no uniforms and no traditional
Not true, drug companies still develop new drugs, the government buys
the drugs from the drug companies, they are just at a negotiated price.
Glaxo Smith Kline, Welcome, Astra Zenica, Bayer, UCB etc all European
drug companies all make profits all develop new drugs.
Yes some drugs cost less
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:33 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:Regulation of Electric and Water
Companies does not increase the cost to consumer. It requires these
monopolies to justify cost increase to the regulatory boards,
Perhaps in a few very isolated areas where there is a lot of
mountain water runoff irrigating the fields, I don't know where that
might be
any more. Globalism has all the fields everywhere overproducing for
export
crops.
I was thinking about Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists etc. Many of
On Friday, April 04, 2008 10:43 AM Nicholas Geti wrote:
Yeah, but based on pictures that come out of India they don't look
good.
And Americans look so much better...
David L. Crooks
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
- Original Message -
From: David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: [OT] $8 FOR A GALLON OF GAS?! IN GERMANY, YES
On Friday, April 04, 2008 10:43 AM Nicholas Geti wrote:
Yeah, but based on pictures that
Not true, drug companies still develop new drugs, the government buys
the drugs from the drug companies, they are just at a negotiated price.
Glaxo Smith Kline, Welcome, Astra Zenica, Bayer, UCB etc all European
drug companies all make profits all develop new drugs.
Yes some drugs cost less than
I suppose the Social Security system is also designed to control USA
citizens. What do you think would happen if all citizens were required
to provide for their own retirement? I hate to say it, but it would be
like throwing sheep to the wolfs, or as Eli Wallach said in the movie
The
How did people do it before social security was
invented? Were people dying in the streets? Were
people jumping out of windows?
--- Leland F. Jackson, CPA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I suppose the Social Security system is also
designed to control USA
citizens. What do you think would
I suppose people didn't retire; they worked until they died. Some were
lucky enough to have children who looked after them. Others who
couldn't work after they were retired without so much as a dime in their
pockets, just crawled off and died somewhere.
Regards,
LelandJ
Michael Madigan
On Friday 04 April 2008 10:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, without the profit motive, little of value would be accomplished
in a reasonable time frame. It has been said that a nationalized health
care system would have the efficiency of the post office and the compassion
of the IRS.
On Friday 04 April 2008 11:32, Michael Madigan wrote:
How did people do it before social security was
invented? Were people dying in the streets? Were
people jumping out of windows?
Hi Michael!
Well, as a matter of fact, yes, that exactly.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
On Friday 04 April 2008 13:06, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I suppose people didn't retire; they worked until they died. Some were
lucky enough to have children who looked after them. Others who
couldn't work after they were retired without so much as a dime in their
pockets, just crawled
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 13:06, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I suppose people didn't retire; they worked until they died. Some were
lucky enough to have children who looked after them. Others who
couldn't work after they were retired without so much as a dime in their
On Friday 04 April 2008 09:58, Nicholas Geti wrote:
On Friday, April 04, 2008 10:43 AM Nicholas Geti wrote:
Yeah, but based on pictures that come out of India they don't look
good.
And Americans look so much better...
David L. Crooks
Except for the weight-challenged.
Hi Nicholas!
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 13:06, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I suppose people didn't retire; they worked until they died. Some were
lucky enough to have children who looked after them. Others who
couldn't work after they were retired without so much as a dime in their
I'm sure there's something to that theory.
--- Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nicholas!
Recalling my days in practice, I never saw anyone
about a weight problem who
was getting the proper minerals in his/her diet. In
retrospect I think the
mineral deficiency prompted
On Friday 04 April 2008 13:32, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 13:06, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I suppose people didn't retire; they worked until they died. Some were
lucky enough to have children who looked after them. Others who
couldn't
Really. What is DHS project Endgame???
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77
or
http://tinyurl.com/9aqnn
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/concentration.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/qvyh5
I see you're kooky as ever, Leland.
--- Leland F. Jackson, CPA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Really. What is DHS project Endgame???
http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77
or
http://tinyurl.com/9aqnn
After all the smoke clears, it will be the creators of Endgame found
paranoid with an extreme fear, (eg hate), of aliens:
jingoism -- chauvinistic patriotism, usually associated with a War Hawk
political stance. In practice, it refers to sections of the general
public who advocate bullying
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:35, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Really. What is DHS project Endgame???
Hi Leland!
Oh, stuff and bother. Of course they have to have a contingency plan for
something like this, what if there were a massive population movement across
the border, should we let the
A universal health care system would level the playing field allow all
those who needed the drug to receive them, regulate prices so their is a
relationship between the cost to produce the drug and the price charged,
Production is not the problem, Leland. It is the development costs. Consider
On Friday 04 April 2008 15:16, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
question remaining is to what final end the paranoia will lead. When
venture such as Endgame get started, they are often justified with the
best of intentions, but almost alway get lost somewhere along the way
cumulating in horrors
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to point to the illegal immigrant situation where better than 70% of
the US citizens want the border secured and neither party is giving us more
than lip service.
Hi Larry!
I think the endgame articles show that they are at least
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:35, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Really. What is DHS project Endgame???
Hi Leland!
Oh, stuff and bother. Of course they have to have a contingency plan for
something like this, what if there were a massive population movement
There is nothing more contagious than fear/hate.
I don't know... stupidity comes pretty close.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true, drug companies still develop new drugs, the government buys
the drugs from the drug companies, they are just at a negotiated price.
Glaxo Smith Kline, Welcome, Astra Zenica, Bayer, UCB etc all European
drug companies all
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 15:16, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
question remaining is to what final end the paranoia will lead. When
venture such as Endgame get started, they are often justified with the
best of intentions, but almost alway get lost somewhere along the
On Friday 04 April 2008 16:09, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It would be irresponsible for the government to not forsee the
possibility and prepare for it. The alternative would be mowing them down
with machine guns on the road. What they are planning is far more humane.
Hi Leland!
This
On Friday 04 April 2008 15:59, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:35, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Really. What is DHS project Endgame???
Oh, stuff and bother. Of course they have to have a contingency plan for
something like this, what if
I ran by Hasting and picked up three movies for the weekend:
The Last Sentinel
I am Legend
The Departed
How did I do?
So far as our immigration policy goes, we should not be building
concentration camps all over the country with plan to rapidly solve the
illegal immigration problem.
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to point to the illegal immigrant situation where better than 70% of
the US citizens want the border secured and neither party is giving us more
than lip service.
Hi Larry!
I think the endgame
On Friday 04 April 2008 17:49, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to point to the illegal immigrant situation where better than 70%
of the US citizens want the border secured and neither party is giving
us more
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 17:49, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 04 April 2008 14:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to point to the illegal immigrant situation where better than 70%
of the US citizens want the border secured
- Original Message -
From: Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] $8 FOR A GALLON OF GAS?! IN GERMANY, YES
On Friday 04 April 2008 09:58, Nicholas Geti wrote:
On Friday, April 04, 2008 10:43 AM
Isn't most of the price taxes?
Of course it is. And that is the kind of European socialism Shrillary and
Barry are pointing us toward. They would like us to become a nation of sheep
that accept that nonsense and immoral confiscation of our money.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report --
On Thursday 03 April 2008 08:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't most of the price taxes?
Of course it is. And that is the kind of European socialism Shrillary and
Barry are pointing us toward. They would like us to become a nation of
sheep
Hi Larry!
OOOPs! The s word. Trying to end the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't most of the price taxes?
Of course it is. And that is the kind of European socialism Shrillary and
Barry are pointing us toward. They would like us to become a nation of
sheep that accept that nonsense and immoral confiscation
Yes, European countries have a much higher percentage tax on petrol
products than in the USA, so as the cost of a barrel oil increases,
there is an increase in the markup to consumers with corresponding
increase as the percentage for taxes that is applied; a kind of double
whammy affect on the
If you think the price of Petrol is expensive in Europe, look at how
much US healthcare and medicines costs
The fuel tax offsets universal healthcare and prescription capped at $12
a time. The last US prescription I paid for was $95 for one lot of pain
killers...
Adam.
-Original
Shouldn't we have choices? Why should a healthy
person who drives pay for a sickly person? If you
want to tax drivers for roads and bridges that's fine.
Maybe we should tax fags to pay for AIDS treatment
instead of the responsible people.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we have choices? Why should a healthy
person who drives pay for a sickly person? If you
want to tax drivers for roads and bridges that's fine.
Maybe we should tax fags to pay for AIDS treatment
instead
Christians don't have homo sex.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we have choices? Why should a healthy
person who drives pay for a sickly person? If
you
want to tax drivers for roads and
I hope the USA can come up with universal health care soon. Having a
petrol tax to help fund the cost of universal health care sounds smart.
It would raise the cost of gas and diesel encouraging conservation,
while lowering CO2 emissions The proceed of the petrol tax would pay
some of the
I bet there are lots of ex young choristers in the RC Church that would
disagree with that statement now they are grown up. Unfortunately most of
the incidents are covered up by the church higherarchy.
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shouldn't we have choices? Why should a healthy
person who drives pay for a sickly person? If you
want to tax drivers for roads and bridges that's fine.
There's a difference between rape and homo sex. The
priests who have gay sex are not Christians. The kids
who are raped are victims.
--- Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet there are lots of ex young choristers in the
RC Church that would
disagree with that statement now they are
Of course there should be insurance, but the bad
driver should pay more than the good driver. The
healthy person should pay less than the sickly person.
The responsible person should pay less than the
irresponsible person.
--- Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at
On Thursday 03 April 2008 12:13, Michael Madigan wrote:
Of course there should be insurance, but the bad
driver should pay more than the good driver. The
healthy person should pay less than the sickly person.
The responsible person should pay less than the
irresponsible person.
Hi Michael!
Michael Madigan wrote:
Of course there should be insurance, but the bad
driver should pay more than the good driver. The
healthy person should pay less than the sickly person.
The responsible person should pay less than the
irresponsible person.
--- Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 03 April 2008 13:46, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Universal health care is a product designed to provide health care
Hi Leland!
All insurance, whatever it is called, is a fraud which real purpose is to
enrich a tiny handfull of insider type people. You ought to know that.
--
Regulation of Electric and Water Companies does not increase the cost to
consumer. It requires these monopolies to justify cost increase to the
regulatory boards, usually by show the cost to provide the services have
increased. The health care industry, I believe, would also benefit from
If you think the price of Petrol is expensive in Europe, look at how
much US healthcare and medicines costs
The fuel tax offsets universal healthcare and prescription capped at $12
a time. The last US prescription I paid for was $95 for one lot of pain
killers...
True, it's expensive and
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think the price of Petrol is expensive in Europe, look at how
much US healthcare and medicines costs
The fuel tax offsets universal healthcare and prescription capped at $12
a time. The last US prescription I paid for was
The regulators would require that health care
providers maintain a reasonable relationship between the prices charged
consumers for health care product and thier costs to deliver the health
care goods and services. This would make the health care industry much
like utility companies that are
Now I am aged, sickly and have no money. I know what they want me to do, they
want me to die. They are doing their best to make that happen.
Pete, I think that's what they call managed care.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
Regulation of Electric and Water Companies does not increase the cost to
consumer.
Everything the government does increases the cost to the consumer... not to
mention the favoritism involved in doling out 'public' benefits.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:Regulation of Electric and Water
Companies does not increase the cost to consumer. It requires these
monopolies to justify cost increase to the regulatory boards, usually by
show the cost to provide the services have increased. The health care
industry, I
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:I hope the USA can come up with universal
health care soon. Having a petrol tax to help fund the cost of universal
health care sounds smart. It would raise the cost of gas and diesel
encouraging conservation, while lowering CO2 emissions The proceed of
the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The regulators would require that health care
providers maintain a reasonable relationship between the prices charged
consumers for health care product and thier costs to deliver the health
care goods and services. This would make the
This mean that paying the majority of the
cost for universal health care by means of a progress tax system may be
best, as those who are most blessed are called upon to make the greatest
contribution into the system. What better way to pay for the necessity
of universal health care, than
On Thursday 03 April 2008 14:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then we would be whining that there are no new drugs coming on the
market.
Hi Larry!
The drug business is crooked from top to bottom. The new drugs generally are
new mainly in the sense that they have fresh patent $ cycles.
On Thursday 03 April 2008 14:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I am aged, sickly and have no money. I know what they want me to do,
they want me to die. They are doing their best to make that happen.
Pete, I think that's what they call managed care.
Hi Larry!
I call it cold-blooded murder.
When companies like water utility companies have unfair advantages,
because of the nature of their monopoly, the best way to protect the
consumer from extortionist practices is regulation. The regulatory
protection is in place to prevent the monopoly from charging exorbitant
prices for a
On Thursday 03 April 2008 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regulation of Electric and Water Companies does not increase the cost to
consumer.
Everything the government does increases the cost to the consumer... not to
mention the favoritism involved in doling out 'public' benefits.
Hi Larry!
On Thursday 03 April 2008 14:34, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
I think they try to blame the lawsuits for their expensive drugs and
services. In your gov't healthcare plan, not only do you want to
regulate cost of medicines/services, but also regulate the cost of
Our medical system is available to everyone too.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:57 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you think the price of Petrol is expensive in
Europe, look at how
much US healthcare and medicines costs
The fuel tax
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our medical system is available to everyone too.
As long as you can pay for it that is
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
You pay for it too, in higher taxes.
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our medical system is available to everyone too.
As long as you can pay for it that is
A+
jml
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vegetation also requires minerals in the soil but only three minerals affect
yield and appearance so only those three are supplied. Humans who eat only
vegetables are mineral deficient.
Sorry Peter, but that's crap.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You pay for it too, in higher taxes.
No shit Sherlock!
--- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Michael Madigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our medical system is available to
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You pay for it too, in higher taxes.
http://www.expatica.com/be/housing/relocation/belgian-healthcare-system-1493.html
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
