Re: [qmailtoaster] Smtproutes

smtproutes works only if the domain is not in localdomains. Il 20/08/2020 20:24, Miguel Angel Amable Ventura ha scritto: Hello everyone, I have been trying to set up the smtproutes file in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes with the following information: domainname.com:ip_address_dest:587 rest

Re: [qmailtoaster] Got the willys with submission log entries

Usually qmail-smtpd simply accept any sender, and then: * delivers always to any local address * relays to remote addresses only if sender ip is allowed to relay or if there has been a successful authentication phase before. So, a standard 587 port accepts anything for local addresses and r

Re: [qmailtoaster] Tony

Which Tony? Il 23/03/2019 00:44, Eric Broch ha scritto: Hi Tony, When I reply to you directly (off list) I get a delivery failure (Remote host said: 554 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry contains your IP address and a banned keyword). Is it possible to whitelist my email address? -- -

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER accepted sender but no mail

You should find additional log entries with recipient informations from CHKUSER... If you find them, unique reason for a message disappeared and not logged from qmail should be a message too big (message exceeding databytes limit). Regards, Tonino Il 11/03/2019 09:03, Tahnan Al Anas ha scritto

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: [Norton AntiSpam]Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS (port 465) is not working

I forgot to delete the word "privately" :-):-):-). Il 12/01/2019 00:16, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Hello Eric, I'm writing privately just for curiosity. Is chkuser still used in your distribution (I wrote chkuser, and I follow some lists on it, but I though it was going

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: [Norton AntiSpam]Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTPS (port 465) is not working

Hello Eric, I'm writing privately just for curiosity. Is chkuser still used in your distribution (I wrote chkuser, and I follow some lists on it, but I though it was going to be abandoned)? Did you customize any variable used by CHKUSER? Actually I'm not using chkuser anymore, since I'm using a

Re: [qmailtoaster] chkusr settings

with the RELAYCLIENT setting: RELAYCLIENT="" Eric On 9/19/2017 3:57 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Rajesh, I don't know which version of chkuser is included in qmailtoaster. Behaviour has changed sometimes. I always tried to configurations stable, but sometimes evolutions lead to

Re: [qmailtoaster] chkusr settings

ll that disable all other aspects for - Original Message ----- From: Tonix - Antonio Nati [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:23:01 +0200 Subject: Eric, it looks like I told and wrote wrong instructions (and I remembered wrong sequences i

Re: [qmailtoaster] chkusr settings

fferently than CHKUSER_START="" (starting_value=0) or CHKUSER_START not specified (starting_value=-1)? Eric On 9/18/2017 1:58 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Eric, you are right. I wrote "NONE" instead of "everything different from ALWAYS or DOMAIN" in order

Re: [qmailtoaster] chkusr settings

Eric, you are right. I wrote "NONE" instead of "everything different from ALWAYS or DOMAIN" in order to semplify things, but the concept is clear: every value different from DOMAIN or ALWAYS will disable chkuser. Note: everything is disabled except the *CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUSTAUTH_VARIABLE* funct

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail - couldn't find any host named grupodecor.com

It looks like nameservers of grupodecor.com do not answer to TCP queries. http://dnscheck.pingdom.com/?domain=grupodecor.com×tamp=1498055971&view=1 Regards, Tonino Il 21/06/2017 14:01, Jeff Koch ha scritto: Hi Boheme: Sorry If I was rude - I do appreciate your response on 6/12 and I conside

Re: [qmailtoaster] Sending outbound email works, but takes about 10 seconds.

Check your dns. It looks like it takes time to solve client reverse ip. Regards, Tonino Il 19/02/2017 17:59, CarlC Internet Services Service Desk ha scritto: -Original Message- From: Eric Broch does this happen in your webmail, squirrelmail and roundcube? Nope... Only with anythin

Re: [qmailtoaster] catch all account and the spam

Il 11/07/2016 20:16, CarlC Internet Services Service Desk ha scritto: >*From:*Dan McAllister >Now I can’t just reply to HOW without adding my 2-cents worth as to why I think “bounce-no-mailbox” is the WORST of the options: >-It allows spammers to “mine” your domain for “good” email addresses

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue is flooding user

It's a personal and business question, and it depends a lot on customer needs. From my point of view, emails are my business but are property of customers, and I must make my best in order to let them control their emails or have the best communication with their business partners using email

Re: [qmailtoaster] queue is flooding user

Il 08/10/2015 19:59, Rajesh M ha scritto: spammer is emailing a non existent user on my server. qmailtoaster is accepting the email and then trying to respond back my queue is flooding because ot this should'nt chkuser be directly bouncing the email during smtp transaction time when email id

Re: [qmailtoaster] Forward to a Different Server

Il 08/07/2015 18:58, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Have also to delete/comment entry for that domain in users. Just to correct my quick (and wrong) answer, after modifying smtproutes, you must be sure that domain is not in /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains and locals. This is the best

Re: [qmailtoaster] Forward to a Different Server

Have also to delete/comment entry for that domain in users. Tonino Il 08/07/2015 18:50, Helmut Fritz ha scritto: Put the domain in your smtproutes file with an entry like this: domain.com newserver.domain.com then all mail for that domain will be forwarded to the new server. I believe this

Re: [qmailtoaster] virtual SUB-domain on the VPOPAMAIL

Sorry, I've read wrongly the lines you submitted. You already used .qmail-hoge, as it sould be. Check if you have valias enabled. In such a case these file aliases will not work, and you must use Mysql records. Regards, Tonino Il 09/02/2015 00:54, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritt

Re: [qmailtoaster] virtual SUB-domain on the VPOPAMAIL

By default chkuser does not check for .qmail-xxx-default in virtual domains. You must write the alias file name exactly: .qmail-hoge. For enabling searching of default files (like .qmail-hoge-default) there is an option which must be enabled and compiled. Tonino Il 08/02/2015 09:34, Noriyuki

Re: [qmailtoaster] question concerning chkuser

It is a known bug (or feature? :-) ). Counters are not reset during same session. Probably all messages are sent in same session, that's to say client open 200 smtp session within same connection. 3 solutions: * raise the limit * tell the customer to force single message sessions * if the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Send/Receive quotas in QMT

Il 09/10/2014 18:39, Dan McAllister ha scritto: QMT Enthusiasts: I am in DESPERATE need of a way to rate-limit certain users on my system. Not only would it help me stop a sometimes well-intentioned, but otherwise abusive user, but it would also help limit the impact of virus-infected clients

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 08/10/2014 15:04, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/8/2014 1:26 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 07/10/2014 21:31, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/4/2014 12:25 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 20:11, Cecil Yother, Jr. ha scritto: On 10/02/2014 10:19 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 07/10/2014 21:31, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/4/2014 12:25 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 20:11, Cecil Yother, Jr. ha scritto: On 10/02/2014 10:19 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 19:16, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Il 02/10/2014 18:52, Eric Broch ha

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 02/10/2014 20:11, Cecil Yother, Jr. ha scritto: On 10/02/2014 10:19 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 19:16, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Il 02/10/2014 18:52, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 10:29 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 18:02, Eric Broch ha

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 02/10/2014 19:16, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Il 02/10/2014 18:52, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 10:29 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 18:02, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 9:10 AM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 8:30 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 10/02/2014

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 02/10/2014 18:52, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 10:29 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 02/10/2014 18:02, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 9:10 AM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 8:30 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 10/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 1:32 AM

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 02/10/2014 18:02, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 10/2/2014 9:10 AM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 8:30 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 10/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 10/2/2014 1:32 AM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 09/25/2014 06:44 PM, Bharath Chari wrote: On 09/25/2014 05:50 PM, Eric Broch

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 25/09/2014 16:50, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/24/2014 9:35 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: On 09/24/2014 07:27 AM, Eric Broch wrote: On 9/24/2014 8:08 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 24/09/2014 15:01, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/24/2014 1:07 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 23/09/2014 18:28

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 24/09/2014 16:08, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: Il 24/09/2014 15:01, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/24/2014 1:07 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 23/09/2014 18:28, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/22/2014 5:39 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 9/22/2014 4:43 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Nice info, Tonino

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 24/09/2014 15:01, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/24/2014 1:07 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 23/09/2014 18:28, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/22/2014 5:39 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 9/22/2014 4:43 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Nice info, Tonino. I know that SPF failures used to do that too, but I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SMTP issue

Il 23/09/2014 18:28, Eric Broch ha scritto: On 9/22/2014 5:39 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 9/22/2014 4:43 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Nice info, Tonino. I know that SPF failures used to do that too, but I think we have a log message for that now. Sounds to me like TLS may be failing. I'd turn on spamd

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP issue

One event which is not logged is exceeded size of incoming message. You see all initial logs, and then nothing more, like disappeared. Regards, Tonino Il 22/09/2014 21:38, Eric Broch ha scritto: Hello list, I'm having and issue and am not sure of the source of the problem. My client's QMT

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT

Il 29/08/2014 16:58, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 08/29/2014 07:12 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: I don't know if the variable you need is enabled in your distribution/version. Actually you could put in place this solution: Enable (uncomment) the following define in checkuser_setti

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT

DER_NOCHECK="1",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="500",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="30" with xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1",SENDER_NOCHECK="1" but doesn't work... checkuser still block incorrect email account M

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT

be more slowly with attachment). - web application sent email to local *MTA * agent who will send email to my smtp server or to other external server Ciao -- Michele Il 29/08/2014 11:21, Tonix - Antonio Nati ha scritto: If your desktop client is taliking directly with the SMTP server with chkuser

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT

If your desktop client is taliking directly with the SMTP server with chkuser enabled, is it high probable the problem is in the desktop client. SMTP server with chkuser enabled should only taks with servers, because servers handle negative answer on one recipient, while desktop clients do not

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Bounced mail checking!

Il 18/06/2014 19:43, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 06/09/2014 05:05 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 09/06/2014 13:57, Tony White ha scritto: Hi folks, Sorry but is there any way I can easily check to see if an email was received and bounced? A client is telling me that someone sent them

Re: [qmailtoaster] Bounced mail checking!

Il 09/06/2014 13:57, Tony White ha scritto: Hi folks, Sorry but is there any way I can easily check to see if an email was received and bounced? A client is telling me that someone sent them an email and it bounced because the attachment was too large. I cannot see any in the log files but

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: to catch all or no

Il 20/05/2014 23:36, Dan McAllister ha scritto: Jim: Per the discussion Antonio and I have been having on this same thread: - I say to set the "invalid" behavior to "delete" (which it appears you have done) - Antonio says to send a bounce message (I disagree and say that this is the WORST of

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: to catch all or no

o not respect CR\LF, I put a patch to accept always messages despite of CR\LF, but my outgoing messages respect the standard. I've seen ISP blocking email from Italy or from Russia or from China, just as their decision, and they were generating big problems only for semplifying their job

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: to catch all or no

Il 19/05/2014 23:26, Angus McIntyre ha scritto: Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: About deleting all email for not existing users, I consider it a bad service to customers, as they have legitimate raports with business partners, and if someone writes to the wrong address it is correct and ethical to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: to catch all or no

Strange, I have an opposite opinion on the most of catch-all and delete usage I'm reading here in this thread. Personally, and as provider of email business, I consider catch-all account useful only when you have a new domain, and customer does not know which mailboxes were running. So you set

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: MX configuration for anti-spam

charge for it. There are plenty more, but those are the ones that quickly jump to mind. Dan On 4/28/2014 1:15 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote: Il 28/04/2014 18:12, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 04/27/2014 01:38 PM, Hasan Akgöz wrote: Hi Eric, The first time I heard you specify the subject. I th

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: MX configuration for anti-spam

Il 28/04/2014 18:12, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 04/27/2014 01:38 PM, Hasan Akgöz wrote: Hi Eric, The first time I heard you specify the subject. I think this method is not a good idea. becuse If you mess around with MX records, you deserve to have lost mails and angry co-workers/customer etc...

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: 451 4.4.0 DNS temporary failure (chkuser)

Il 16/10/2013 21:46, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I would normally answer pdns, because it's local. I'm not aware of any drawbacks to using pdns-recursor. Is pdns running? # chkconfig --list pdns-recursor # service pdns status Are you seeing any pdns errors in the log? # grep pdns /var/log/message

Re: [qmailtoaster] Outgoingip / Outgoingips

Il 24/09/2013 19:37, Nicholas Chua ha scritto: Hi, Have anything work with outgoingip / outgoiningips Can any of these patches do what I want below. I had binded 2 IPs to eth0 and eth0:1 respectively with IP 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2. I would like to send emails to abc.com domain using IP 1.1.1.1 a

Re: [qmailtoaster] cannot configure email account in Thunderbird

Try authentication: plain password. Regards, Tonino Il 13/09/2013 13:30, ChandranManikandan ha scritto: Hi All, Please find the attachment of my problem. I was using courier imap and it was working perfect. After migrate from courier to dovecot. I could not able to create email account in th

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser config and patch tweaks on fresh QTP install

Il 04/06/2013 20:11, Sven Miller ha scritto: On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Eric Shubert > wrote: On 06/04/2013 09:38 AM, Sven Miller wrote: Previously I stumbled my way through a qmailtoaster install, and now I have to do a fresh install o

Re: [qmailtoaster] Relaying

Check if that account is enabled to relay in vpopmail. If it is, it will relay despite of tcprules settings. Remove permission from that single account. Regards, Tonino Il 27/03/2013 17:58, Rvaught ha scritto: Is there a way to block relaying for one email account ? *From:*Helmut Fritz [m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: quotes in outlook

Il 22/02/2013 17:11, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 02/22/2013 12:28 AM, Rajesh M wrote: hi we get errors like this when users use outlook -- outlook inserts brackets and quotes. # Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns1.bizmailservers.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your mes

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: client gets "you are breaking our security rules" when sending 300 invoices to thier clients.

Il 27/12/2012 21:17, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: Il 27/12/2012 19:40, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 12/27/2012 02:58 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 24/12/2012 23:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto: These are all good things to do to QMT, and I hope to have separate tcprules for smtp and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: client gets "you are breaking our security rules" when sending 300 invoices to thier clients.

Il 27/12/2012 19:40, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 12/27/2012 02:58 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 24/12/2012 23:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto: These are all good things to do to QMT, and I hope to have separate tcprules for smtp and submission ports in the stock QMT at some point. Tony, from

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: client gets "you are breaking our security rules" when sending 300 invoices to thier clients.

Il 24/12/2012 23:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto: These are all good things to do to QMT, and I hope to have separate tcprules for smtp and submission ports in the stock QMT at some point. Tony, from what you've indicated though, I expect it's the intrusion threshold rule that's biting you. I'm no

Re: [qmailtoaster] delivery problem with apostrophe in sender's address

Il 04/12/2012 13:35, Rvaught ha scritto: I am having a problem receiving mail from a customer who has an apostrophe in their email address. (LO'n...@somewhere.com). Here is the error message they are receiving : 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'Requested action not taken: mailbox unavaila

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER questions

Il 13/11/2012 11:09, Nikolay Mitev ha scritto: Hi Team, Please a little help, I activated RCPTCHECK = "1" in the tcp rules, but continues to successfully receivefromlog emails to non-existent recipients. How can you activate the check of local users and generate notification to sender. Best

Re: [qmailtoaster] Catch-all like Google Apps

Il 23/10/2012 17:13, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi, Google Apps has a special way to manage incoming emails to non existent users when catch-all is enabled. For example, mydomain.com is hosted at Google and have catch-all to a...@mydomain.com. Somebody send me an email message with 2 (non ex

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Very Slow Server

If you are in a data center, use DNSes of your connectivity provider. For sure it has more cache than your and is more updated. Regards, Tonino Il 11/09/2012 16:58, Mike Tirpak ha scritto: I would love to change the dns cache server, but it is in production and I don't want to mess it up. I

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

You have senders and recipients addresses. They are listed in first part (before :) of tap configuration. backup address is not important at all (and should never be in first part of tap config file). Regards, Tonino Il 17/05/2012 16:09, Manikandan Mariappan ha scritto: Hi Tonino,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: TAPS ISSUE

http://www.inter7.com/qmailtap/README.tap qmail provides the ability to make a copy of each email that flows through the system. This is done using the QUEUE_EXTRA code. See qmail FAQ #8.2 The qmail tap patch adds additional functionality: 1) Specify which email addresses to tap us

Re: [qmailtoaster] TAPS ISSUE

Ideally you shoould find three copies (including sender), but I remeber TAPS only backups first match it finds in configuration. Probably, if you change the order of recipients (and use a different sender), you could check if only first recipient is backuped. Regards, Tonino Il 17/05/2012 1

Re: [qmailtoaster] question concerning chkuser

That message has nothing to do with chkuser. Check your permissions. Regards, Tonino Il 04/04/2012 04:43, Rajesh M ha scritto: hi using qmailtoaster on centos. i have spamdyke and chkuser enabled i got an error like this in my log file today which was quite puzzling write_to_qmail-inject_fa

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: RENAMED - Hardware vs. Software RAID

Il 03/04/2012 18:04, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 04/03/2012 01:09 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: World is grey sometimes, between the white of HW raid and the black of SW raid. I am a fan of hardware raid, and we use at the most HP SmartArray cards, as we feel they are very reliable and fast

Re: [qmailtoaster] RENAMED - Hardware vs. Software RAID

Il 02/04/2012 23:55, Dan McAllister ha scritto: From an earlier post: Of course your hardware configuration can make a difference too. You mentioned 2x2TB drives. I hope you have them configured as raid-1 mirrors (software raid should do fine for raid-1). raid-1 will give you a l

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Questions on setting for the special e-mailaccount

I'm not following closely this thread, but I'm listening something odd. For each define like "CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10" there is also in chkuser.c #if defined CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10 && (user->s[x] != CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR_10) #endif So, just adding another define in ch

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fwd: pop3 port response very slow in private IP

High likely you have problems with DNS, as local IP are probably not resolved. Regards, Tonino Il 08/03/2012 13:25, Manikandan Mariappan ha scritto: Hi, I have problem with my qmail server pop3 port(110) response very slow in private IP(192.168.1.20) only. Other ports response were

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 06/03/2012 20:37, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 06/03/2012 18:29, Eric Shubert ha scritto: Would you suggest we be using the #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS by default? It seems to me we should, as the "-anything" exte

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 06/03/2012 18:29, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/06/2012 08:57 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 06/03/2012 16:47, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: Il 06/03/2012 16:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/06/2012 07:40 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I've made some telnets to your

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 06/03/2012 16:47, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: Il 06/03/2012 16:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/06/2012 07:40 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I've made some telnets to your email server, and it looks like accepting all for @yourdomain. Is bouncing enabled? No, I have a cat

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 06/03/2012 16:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/06/2012 07:40 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: I've made some telnets to your email server, and it looks like accepting all for @yourdomain. Is bouncing enabled? No, I have a catchall account defined. That account is different than the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 05/03/2012 21:04, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/05/2012 12:37 PM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 05/03/2012 20:10, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/05/2012 11:47 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 05/03/2012 19:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I'm not so sure of this, Tonino. I have the l

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 05/03/2012 20:10, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 03/05/2012 11:47 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 05/03/2012 19:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I'm not so sure of this, Tonino. I have the latest qmail-toaster package installed, which does not have CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS enabled

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

Il 05/03/2012 19:28, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I'm not so sure of this, Tonino. I have the latest qmail-toaster package installed, which does not have CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS enabled (it's still commented out). I just ran a test, and when I sent from eric@ to eric-test@ it works fine.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.21 now available

Errata corrige! Il 05/03/2012 19:18, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: Il 05/03/2012 19:03, Eric Shubert ha scritto: Sometimes you guys make me crazy. This version of qmail-toaster fixes the problems we've had in the past with special characters in email addresses. If you upgrade to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.21 now available

Il 05/03/2012 19:03, Eric Shubert ha scritto: Sometimes you guys make me crazy. This version of qmail-toaster fixes the problems we've had in the past with special characters in email addresses. If you upgrade to this version, you should be fine with leaving chkuser enabled. At some point in

Re: [qmailtoaster] chkuser rejecting mail to users with hyphens

It looks like you have names extensions on (like accepting russ-*@tidewins.com). If true, you must enable in chkuser_settings.h CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS. Regards, Tonino On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, Russ Goodwin wrote: Hi- I just upgraded our QMT install using the qtp-newmodel script a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Per Session Limit Question

Il 24/02/2012 21:03, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 02/24/2012 12:24 PM, Joel Eddy wrote: That's kinda what I figured it did. Just wasn't 100% on that decision. Thanks for the info. I think what's happening is the client uses Peachtree accounting to send invoices. And from what I remember of Peacht

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Per Session Limit Question

Il 23/02/2012 19:35, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Joel Eddy wrote: As an example the client has a group that is mailed to. The group has 62 addresses. When the client tries to send to that group the per session limit pops up. My first reaction was that it's a Norton Issue

Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication methods

Il 16/02/2012 13:45, Bharath Chari ha scritto: On Thursday 16 February 2012 05:42 PM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: My point of view is related to extra QMT features, so it could be out of topic. We are willing to integrate some assistance trouble ticketing and/or other web services for e-mail

Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication methods

My point of view is related to extra QMT features, so it could be out of topic. We are willing to integrate some assistance trouble ticketing and/or other web services for e-mail users, so we plan to use the same vpopmail auth table also for other external packages. From this point of view, a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Migrating to new server

Il 06/02/2012 18:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 02/06/2012 10:21 AM, John Raley wrote: One of my clients is moving from a Qmailtoaster server (setup by me) to Exchange 2010 and has tasked me to perform the migration for them. The problem I am having is that I have to manually change their Outlo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Hypervisor recommendations for virtualizing QMT

If you speak about Linux preferences, I don't know... We use FreeBSD. If you speak about the best virtual environment, no doubt... VMware. Stable, stable, stable... Indipendent from OS... No need to have custom kernels. We use VMware, hosting FreeBSD, Linux, Windows... every version of them c

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to SMTPS submission/port 587

So if a customer of yours uses as SMTP server another server (i.e. a mobile SMTP), and uses his own address as sender, you are going to block his emails. Correct? Tonino Il 24/01/2012 12:47, Kalil Costa - Brasilsite ha scritto: I read that is more simples block my clients with spamdyke usi

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to SMTPS submission/port 587

Correction: :-) I don't understand *why* a user should have adavantage using it. Tonino Il 21/01/2012 12:08, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: There is something I don't understand. An autenticated user, using relay, has no spam control, no grey list, as he is already authentic

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to SMTPS submission/port 587

riginal Message----- From: Tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 5:11 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to SMTPS submission/port 587 Il 21/01/2012 01:39, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 01/20/2012 01:07 PM, Michael

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to SMTPS submission/port 587

Il 21/01/2012 01:39, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 01/20/2012 01:07 PM, Michael J. Colvin wrote: I believe you could use SpamDyke to block your users from sending via port 25... You could block via the domain name, you could block by IP address and rDNS, assuming your users have specific IP's (O

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: how to SMTPS submission/port 587

Il 20/01/2012 23:14, Eric Shubert ha scritto: I think Tonino's post earlier was right on. Perhaps his spanish is better than mine. ;) ? Your spanish is bad because the link is ... Portuguese :-) Regards, Tonino -- Inte

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to SMTPS submission/port 587

You can lock port 25 to your users only if you can control their network. If they come from external networks you can't control if they use port 25 (without authentication) for delivering to your domains. Correct usage of port 25 should be forced by access providers, which should deny any out

Re: [qmailtoaster] Help I am sending Spam

Get one of the offending messages, study headers and examine which is the way message is entering the system. Do you have any web site which could send a malformed form to qmail? Tonino Il 25/11/2011 09:45, Mike Canty ha scritto: To all, I have a Qmail-Toaster server that is sending SP

Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp very slow...

99% is DNS problem. Among other checks, check you have -l 'whatevername' in your qmail-smtpd run command. Regards, Tonino Il 16/11/2011 23:48, Christian Clemmen ha scritto: Hi, The email sending on my qmail toaster is very slow... when I troubleshoot using telnet, I found that it takes m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Relaying email from client email address but not on my server!

Remote sender is authenticathing using correct username/password (I suppose you use smtp auth). So, it is enabled to send everywhere, not only to local addresses. If it is someone who stole username/password, change password imemdiately, and communicate new password to real customer. Regards,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: databytes limit diferent by domain‏

Il 13/09/2011 16:13, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 09/13/2011 03:34 AM, teclas sorianat wrote: Hi: I'm new in this list, but not in the use of qmail. My question is about the databytes file. The number writed in this file is used for all the domains in the server, but I need a different limit fo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: commercial ESP for forwarded SMTP?

Il 13/09/2011 04:12, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 09/12/2011 05:39 PM, Quinn Comendant wrote: We'll be deploying a mail server on a Rackspace cloud server, and they suggested that because their offering is 'utility computing' the IP addresses included are dirty (in a blacklist kind of way) and w

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER > invalid rcpt MX domain

Il 07/09/2011 23:19, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: Il 07/09/2011 23:07, Carlos Herrera Polo ha scritto: I have a problem with "chkuser" when send email, please help tcp.smtp file : 192.168.3.233:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1",SENDER

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER > invalid rcpt MX domain

Il 07/09/2011 23:07, Carlos Herrera Polo ha scritto: I have a problem with "chkuser" when send email, please help tcp.smtp file : 192.168.3.233:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1",SENDER_NOCHECK="1" The log : 09-07 15:50:58 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from mailto:e...@rem.com>:> remo

[qmailtoaster] OFF Topic: egroupware vs simple-groupware

his should become a moot issue for me anyway, but perhaps this will be helpful for someone else. Thanks everyone! Tim On Wed, August 31, 2011 5:22 pm, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Sorry, but your analisys is partially wrong. When chkuser has a negative answer from DNS, it sends back: *CHKUSER_RCPTMX_S

Re: [qmailtoaster] 451 DNS Temporary Failure: Issue that should be addressed in CHKUSER

ussion. As it turns out, I'm migrating all my users to eGroupware over the next 6 months, so this should become a moot issue for me anyway, but perhaps this will be helpful for someone else. Thanks everyone! Tim On Wed, August 31, 2011 5:22 pm, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Sorry, but your ana

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Updated more info>>[Fwd: [qmailtoaster] 451 DNS Temporary Failure: Issue that should be addressed in CHKUSER]

Il 01/09/2011 00:15, Eric Shubert ha scritto: On 08/31/2011 02:46 PM, Tim Pleiman wrote: Is that this tcp.smtp rule? SENDER_NOCHECK="1" It's possible that I may have dealt with this before on a different server and have simply forgotten. I implemented the above setting on another system due

Re: [qmailtoaster] 451 DNS Temporary Failure: Issue that should be addressed in CHKUSER

Sorry, but your analisys is partially wrong. When chkuser has a negative answer from DNS, it sends back: *CHKUSER_RCPTMX_STRING* 2.0.5 defined "511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for rcpt domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser)\r\n" or *CHKUSER_SENDERMX_STRING* 2.0.5 defined "511 sorry, can't find a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: TLS on 587

Il 27/08/2011 01:15, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. ha scritto: I have whitelisted my customer IPs so they can now send via port 25 if they desire. My support staff were starting to get frazelled by all the calls they were receiving. I do not assign rPTR records for most of my customers and with the

Re: [qmailtoaster] CHKUSER rejects email due to apostrophe

Il 27/07/2011 14:39, Digital Instruments ha scritto: On 27/07/2011 13:28, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Il 27/07/2011 13:24, Digital Instruments ha scritto: Hi list, I've got a huge problem here. *CHKUSER rejected sender*: from remote rcpt <> : *invalid sender address format*

  1   2   >