RE: Named restart problem

2003-09-13 Thread Mohit Raina - Infrastructure Monitoring Team
Hi, Please browse the below link http://www.crazysquirrel.com/linux/dns.php cheers ! -Original Message- From: Rudolf Amirjanyan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Named restart problem Hello List, Can you recommend so

Re: Named restart problem

2003-09-13 Thread MKlinke
On Saturday 13 September 2003 09:38, Rudolf Amirjanyan wrote: > Hello List, > Can you recommend something of what to do if a want to stop my named > by making /etc/init.d/named restart, I get the the following: > Stopping named: named: already [EMAIL PROTECTED] hostname root]# > And when I do > > [

Re: named error log

2003-09-02 Thread Daniel Tan
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 10:35 PM Subject: RE: named error log Daniel Tan wrote: > i would like to know what these errors mean? > why did it failed? [snip] All of these logfile entries look to be DDNS updates that were rejected by your DNS serv

RE: named error log

2003-09-01 Thread Cowles, Steve
Daniel Tan wrote: > i would like to know what these errors mean? > why did it failed? [snip] All of these logfile entries look to be DDNS updates that were rejected by your DNS server. 1) Are your zone definitions configured to allow DDNS update (allow-update) requests from dhcp clients? 2) Is

Re: named problem on RH9

2003-08-17 Thread Josep M.
Hello. First of all..Install the updates,if not You will have a lot of problems! Josep Begin of Quote Marvin Suntonvipart : >Hi all, > > > >I just recently installed RH9 from RH8 and used the bind config utility to configure >DNS. On RH8 it was a simple straightforward process and it wor

Re: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Pifer wrote: > Thanks, I'll try that. Do you know if there are RPMs for bind 9 on > Redhat 8.0? Been googling and the only one I've found is from Suse. Check your installation discs. Bind 9.2.1 is what ships with RedHat 8.0. - -- Todd

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread James Pifer
Steve. Thanks for the clarification and info. I am interested in your examples if you don't mind. James On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 11:32, Cowles, Steve wrote: > James Pifer wrote: > > Steve, > > Sorry, a couple more questions. I've been trying to find complete > > examples of the named.conf on the n

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread Cowles, Steve
James Pifer wrote: > Steve, > Sorry, a couple more questions. I've been trying to find complete > examples of the named.conf on the net and haven't found any. The man > pages don't seem to go into much detail. Not sure how to modify mine. > > Below is my current named.conf. Does the example you se

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread James Pifer
Steve, Sorry, a couple more questions. I've been trying to find complete examples of the named.conf on the net and haven't found any. The man pages don't seem to go into much detail. Not sure how to modify mine. Below is my current named.conf. Does the example you sent go above, below, or replace

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread Cowles, Steve
James Pifer wrote: > Thanks, I'll try that. Do you know if there are RPMs for bind 9 on > Redhat 8.0? Been googling and the only one I've found is from Suse. > Can't help you there. If all else fails you can always download the bind9 source from isc.org and compile/install. I know!! Easier said t

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-31 Thread James Pifer
Thanks, I'll try that. Do you know if there are RPMs for bind 9 on Redhat 8.0? Been googling and the only one I've found is from Suse. Thanks, James On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 21:33, Cowles, Steve wrote: > James Pifer wrote: > > Besides adding a second DNS server, is there any way for the DNS > > serv

RE: named/Bind8 questions

2003-07-30 Thread Cowles, Steve
James Pifer wrote: > Besides adding a second DNS server, is there any way for the DNS > server to respond to external requests (through the firewall) one > way, and to respond to internal requests another? Yes, switch to using Bind 9 and then implement its "view" feature. then you can then run a s

Re: named

2003-07-15 Thread Ian Mortimer
> > OS: Redhat 7.3 > > These are actually threads of named rather than seperate copies of the > binary. Only one copy is actuallt taking up memory Is named threaded in RH 7.3? RH 7.3: # ps -ef | grep named | grep -v grep named23131 1 0 Jun20 ?00:00:00 named -u named n

RE: named

2003-07-15 Thread David Hollister
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 09:34, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote: > I see, thanks. How do I get the amount of memory being used by named, or any process > and it's children for that matter? > > Cheers, > Nigel Well, the SIZE column in ps output will show you roughly how much of the program is curr

RE: named

2003-07-15 Thread Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: named > > > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:20, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote: > > Thanks. I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just curios, how do you > know and what's the difference with Apache (below) that is using > up m

RE: named

2003-07-15 Thread David Hollister
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 07:20, Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design wrote: > Thanks. I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just curios, how do you know and what's the > difference with Apache (below) that is using up memory for each process? > > And why does ps show individual threads? Shouldn't it only show proc

RE: named

2003-07-15 Thread Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
4508 0.0 1.3 /usr/sbin/httpd Sorry for so many questions. Cheers, Nigel > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rus Foster > Sent: 15 July 2003 15:07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: named > > > > OS:

Re: named

2003-07-15 Thread Rus Foster
> OS: Redhat 7.3 > > I want to reduce the number of named processes. I am assuming that they are spare > servers in the same way as with Apache, they are taking up memory which could be > better used as the load on DNS for this server is minimal. > > Is this possible and how do I do it? > > PID

Re: Named setup: modify pid file location

2003-07-11 Thread John-Paul Delaney
OK... didn't get any reply on this but more in-depth googling found the answer to my problem: use the line: pid-file "/var/run/named/named.pid"; in the options section of named.conf. Many thanks to owner of: http://karmak.org/archive/2002/08/dns/ /j-p. On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, John-P

Re: named error

2003-03-16 Thread MKlinke
The author's web site is: http://www.isc.org/products/BIND where you'll find many documents and email lists dealing with bind. Be prepared to provide the revision of bind you're running, your zonefile(s) and/or your named.conf files. A searchable version of the bind9 email list is here: ht

Re: Named question

2003-03-07 Thread Robert Canary
If you look in your named.conf you will probally see an entry for recursion rights/access "Rudik A.A." wrote: > > Hello Boys, > > On my Linux 7.1 server when I do tail -f /var/log/messages there are > lots of such kind of lines: > named[972]: denied recursion for query from [] for ..

Re: named refused query?

2002-12-13 Thread Gary
Hi Ashley, On Friday, December 13, 2002, 6:19 PM, you put forth, in part, about "named refused query?": A> Lately I'm seeing a lot of these messages pop up in my server log. A> Anyone know why? A> named[416]: refused query on non-query socket from [207.14.100.134].53 A google search comes

Re: named & /etc/resolv.conf

2002-07-03 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 16:28, Michael George wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 04:41:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > > In your resolv.conf file, do you have a "search" line that lists, at > > least, your domain? > > yeah, that's the odd thing... Since it works for the other hosts on the > networ

Re: named & /etc/resolv.conf

2002-06-27 Thread Michael George
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 04:41:06PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > In your resolv.conf file, do you have a "search" line that lists, at > least, your domain? yeah, that's the odd thing... Since it works for the other hosts on the network, it seems that named is working right. But something odd is

Re: named & /etc/resolv.conf

2002-06-27 Thread Mike Burger
In your resolv.conf file, do you have a "search" line that lists, at least, your domain? On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Michael George wrote: > I am having a little trouble with my system and it's really got me confused. > > Everything worked fine until I rebooted the system, and now it's squirrelly...

Re: Named error

2002-04-29 Thread dbrett
Hi Robert Check the permissions of the directory. It sounds like the user named is running under (probably named) does not have permission to create the file david On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Robert Bleumer wrote: > When I start named -g, it gives me an error that it can't open > /var/run/named/name

Re: named

2001-04-18 Thread Mike Chambers
Try /etc/rc.d/init.d/named restart Mike - Original Message - From: "Nathalie Boulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:49 AM Subject: named > Hi, > > I just discovered that my secondary DNS file named.my

Re: named process

2001-04-06 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Nathalie, > ps aux | grep named > I do not get any reply except the line for "grep named". > when I run "ktop" I can see the named process and its PID. > Named is surely running because it is handling "nslookup" queries. In response to other responses: using ps aux is fine

Re: named process

2001-04-05 Thread Thierry ITTY
I think the problem is not in the "ps" behaviour. i had to solve it too and the thing is that when ps is piped to another command, it may happen that its output lines are truncated to 80 columns. check that by comparing a bare "ps aux" output with a "ps aux | more" output. the trick is to add "w"

Re: named process

2001-04-05 Thread Eric Sisler
Nathalie Boulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >when i execute : >ps aux | grep named >I do not get any reply except the line for "grep named". >when I run "ktop" I can see the named process and its PID. >Named is surely running because it is handling "nslookup" queries. > >Why can't I see the "named

Re: named process

2001-04-05 Thread Rob Wolfe
Searching my feeble memory... Doesnt ps (all by itself, with no options) just give the processes associated with your current login session (or some reasonable facsimile of this). to get all processes I think the correct incantation is ps -A (it could be small a too, I always mess it up first

Re: named hanging

2001-03-16 Thread Thierry ITTY
i got the same problem with rh 6.1 and bind 8.2.x i should have had to sniff the network to get sure about, but i thought of DoS attacks i moved to rh 7 with bind 9.1 and it works fine now you'd check your level of bind and known vulnerabilities A 17:34 16/03/2001 +1000, vous avez écrit : >I hav

RE: named problems

2001-03-12 Thread Gill, Vern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Turns out I lied. Remming the first acl did help, then removing the 192.168.0.0/16; is what did it. Sorry for being stupid... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOqzy0BeamMdwy9

Re: named question....

2000-12-17 Thread Fred Edmister
No, SNMP isn't on that server, but I polled if for several "default" services as well as DNS, and all come up ok, accept DNS. (SMTP, POP3, HTTP and FTP) It's got me stumped... LOL Also changed the polling from ICMP to TCP/IP. Someone mentioned to me a few weeks ago that named wasn

Re: named question....

2000-12-17 Thread Mike Burger
Do you have SNMP running? One of the main things WUG uses for monitoring is SNMP. Also, if you've blocked ICMP packets on that box, WUG might barf on it. It uses ping for its polling procedure. On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Fred Edmister wrote: > Hey everyone. Got a quick question for you. I h

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-16 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello David, > After further investigation I discovered the problem is the forwarder is > not responding. The DNS server has a private IP address and the forwarder is a > public ip address. There is a firewall between the two servers. What is > required to get replys back from t

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
After further investigation I discovered the problem is the forwarder is not responding. The DNS server has a private IP address and the forwarder is a public ip address. There is a firewall between the two servers. What is required to get replys back from the forwarder? david On Fri, 15 Dec

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Hi Michael If I stop named. All network connections work properly (including ping internet addresses) When I start named I can no longer ping any ip address not in dns. I cannot do a lookup of any ip address not in the local domain All local domain entries are pingable and can be looked up dav

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Hi Lenord If I stop named, then ping works correctly. If I ping an address in the DNS then it works. It looks to me like I have DNS configured incorectly for looking up external addresses. david On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi again David, > > > Even a

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
I have the HOWTO and unfortunately, to me it looks like everything is correct david On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi David, > > > I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I > > need help with is requests outside my domain. >

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
Well, we're going to have to look more at your networking issues. If you can not ping anything outside your network, you're looking at other problems...not DNS, as Leonard noted. Do you have your gateway and netmask set properly? On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:05:48 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote: >He

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Here is the contents of the /etc/resolv.conf file. The last two entrys I put in to see if this would help. I also tried nameserver as 127.0.0.1 as well. None of these configurations worked. I did restart named after each change domain company.com search company.com nameserver 10.1.100.9

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
True...but if "nameserver 127.0.0.1" isn't included in that resolv.conf file, lookups won't work. Also, even if it is included, if the connection to the net isn't there, it won't work, either. In other words, as long as you have a working DNS setup on 127.0.0.1, and a connection to the net, it s

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi again David, > Even a > ping to an IP address on the internet from the DNS server fails as well. A little oversight from me here. If you can't ping an IP address something else is wrong. You don't need DNS for this, because you are not resolving names in this case. Maybe so

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, > I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I > need help with is requests outside my domain. It's been a while since I have done anything with DNS, but I set up a DNS for a tiny domain over a year ago. I don't remember any of the details,

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Michael, > What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file? > > You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in > order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better. The machine that is the DNS only needs a reference to itsel

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file? You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:37:14 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote: >I have almost figured out how to g

RE: named

2000-11-09 Thread Mike Lewis
(brainfart) Of course the info given by Uncle Meat & Charles is more appropriate in this case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Lewis Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: named Try:

RE: named

2000-11-09 Thread Mike Lewis
Try: rpm -qa | grep named -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Skrogstad Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 7:08 PM To: Red Hat Mailing list Subject: Re: named It was not so much that it was RTFM is was I looked at the man. I just

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Eddie Strohmier
y, November 08, 2000 10:29 PM Subject: Re: named > I am running vesion bind-8.2.2_P5-9. Named is in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/ > directory. But I am not sure how it is being run? What I am trying to do > is use this virgin server as a back DNS server. So I am pointing my > primary at

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote: > I am running vesion bind-8.2.2_P5-9. Named is in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/ > directory. But I am not sure how it is being run? What I am trying to do > is use this virgin server as a back DNS server. So I am pointing my > primary at this server and I h

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Dan Horth
a bit of a hack may be but when trying to work out how processes get started, where processes are getting their info, etc from I try something like this: rgrep -r "\-u named" /etc/ (note in this case I needed to enclose the query string in quotes because of the space - and escape the -u with

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Scott Skrogstad
yes this is true and after reading it again for the 10th time that point stuck me in the face. Scott Skrogstad Computer Integration Inc, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-522-3475 Phone On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Uncle Meat wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:08:21 -0600 (CST) > Scott Skrogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Scott Skrogstad
I am running vesion bind-8.2.2_P5-9. Named is in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/ directory. But I am not sure how it is being run? What I am trying to do is use this virgin server as a back DNS server. So I am pointing my primary at this server and I have put the information in the /etc/named.boot. Do

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Uncle Meat
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:08:21 -0600 (CST) Scott Skrogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was not so much that it was RTFM is was I looked at the man. I just > don't ask a question because I am lazy. I understand what named does but > I don't understand how the heck the -u got in there. I looked

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Charles Galpin
well, actually I'd put this under the newbie category. You find an executable called named, but no rpm by that name. mmhh. what now?.. cratch. scratch. You look and see what rpm the named binary came from! [cgalpin@pooh cgalpin]$ rpm -qf `which named` bind-8.2.2_P5-9 oh, and in case you didn't

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote: > It was not so much that it was RTFM is was I looked at the man. I just > don't ask a question because I am lazy. I understand what named does but > I don't understand how the heck the -u got in there. I looked at the man > page again and of course i

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Scott Skrogstad
It was not so much that it was RTFM is was I looked at the man. I just don't ask a question because I am lazy. I understand what named does but I don't understand how the heck the -u got in there. I looked at the man page again and of course if you have looked at it. It does not talk about nam

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote: > Just installed a new 6.2 server as my backup named server. When I do a ps > aux|grep named I get > > named 535 0.1 0.8 2528 1668 ?S20:18 0:00 named -u named > scott 864 0.0 0.2 1360 508 pts/0S20:25 0:00 grep n

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Marco Shaw
ginal Message - From: "Scott Skrogstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Red Hat Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:06 PM Subject: Re: named > Nice answer.. I will read the F??king manual. But it is starting > automaticly and I am

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Scott Skrogstad
Nice answer.. I will read the F??king manual. But it is starting automaticly and I am not doing it as a user. But hey thank you for extending your vast knowledge on the subject. Scott Skrogstad Computer Integration Inc, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 800-522-3475 Phone On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Statux wrote: >

Re: named

2000-11-08 Thread Statux
I think RTFM applies. Maybe -u means user (I don't use named but this is my guess). You can always read the man page :) On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Scott Skrogstad wrote: > Just installed a new 6.2 server as my backup named server. When I do a ps > aux|grep named I get > > named 535 0.1 0.8 2

Re: named is logging in the wrong time zone

2000-10-30 Thread Dan Horth
that does seem to make sense... and it works! :) thanks for that - this is my first chroot-ing experience! thanks again - dan. At 7:25 AM -0600 30/10/00, Bret Hughes wrote: >My guess, and it is just a guess is that named cannot find any time zone >information since it it chrooted. Can you give

Re: named is logging in the wrong time zone

2000-10-30 Thread Bret Hughes
Dan Horth wrote: > Hi - I set up our named server on one of our test servers in a chroot > jail over the weekend in our ongoing effort to tighten security as > much as possible, and have noticed a strange thing - in that named is > logging all it's info to the syslog at a different time to the re

Re: named startup from init.d

2000-09-04 Thread Bret Hughes
Arturs Korneevs wrote: > ** Reply Requested by 9/6/2000 (Wednesday) ** > > Hello, > I have RH 6.2, named 8.2.2_P5-9 (original RH rpm) > > I chrooted named to /var/named, and it's works if > I run it from command line (named -u named -g named -t /var/named). > > But if I run it from original /etc/

Re: named and logcheck questions

2000-05-25 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 10:59:31AM +1000, Dan Horth wrote: > Hiya - two staged problem / question here... > > we use logcheck to monitor our logfiles and are getting a lot of > errors like this being reported: > > May 26 10:31:43 named[511]: bad referral (228.165.in-addr.arpa !< > 132.228.165.

RE: named keeps vanishing

2000-02-27 Thread Jose M. Sanchez
I had an identical problem with a DNS server I maintain for a company... It turned out that someone was hacking into the system and installing an IRC bot (Eggdrop) and thereby killing named. Their files would somehow overwrite it... I was re-installing it from the RPM on a daily basis... Using

Re: named restarting problem

2000-02-26 Thread Vidiot
>At isc.org on the home page is a discussion of P5, might only be a >tarball, although i have this in an rpm here somewhere. What version of >RedHat and what version of the kernel are you running? If you cannot >find it, i can probably whip you up a quickie src.rpm for you to rebuild >on your serv

Re: named restarting problem

2000-02-26 Thread hUnTeR
Vidiot wrote: > > >There are newer RPMS for bind P5 as far as i know that take care of yet > >an additional exploit found. I would sugget you visit www.isc.org and > >check that out. > > I found no new RPMs at www.isc.org, just source. The chart seems to indicate > that the P3 release is just f

Re: named restarting problem

2000-02-26 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Vidiot wrote: > I found no new RPMs at www.isc.org, just source. The chart seems to indicate > that the P3 release is just fine. > > Anyone at Redhat care to comment on the P5 patch not being on line? Sure, the P5 patch simply isn't important. All the real problems P5 fixe

Re: named restarting problem

2000-02-26 Thread Vidiot
>There are newer RPMS for bind P5 as far as i know that take care of yet >an additional exploit found. I would sugget you visit www.isc.org and >check that out. I found no new RPMs at www.isc.org, just source. The chart seems to indicate that the P3 release is just fine. Anyone at Redhat care

Re: named restarting problem

2000-02-26 Thread hUnTeR
Vidiot wrote: > > Redhat 6.0 > bind rpms for bind-8.2.2_P3-1 > > Didn't know there was a security hole until it bit me :-( > > In any event, named is supposed to be able to be restarted using: > > /etc/rc.d/init.d/named start > > But, all that happens is "Starting named:" No OK, no n

Re: named as root by default

2000-02-13 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Greg Wright wrote: > there is a chrooted version, I have SRPMS here somewhere if > interested.. I'm interested in the implementation details, but prefer to tweak my own config. I don't like using "non-standard" RPM's when I could just make manual changes to exist

Re: named as root by default

2000-02-13 Thread Greg Wright
there is a chrooted version, I have SRPMS here somewhere if interested.. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/02/00 at 22:03 Todd A. Jacobs wrote: >Why is named set to run as root by default in RHL? Isn't current best >practice to run named as an unpriveleged user? > >--

Re: named, linuxconf, .sh scripts

2000-01-16 Thread Jacques Gelinas
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Paul R. Watkins wrote: > 4. linuxconf -- how do I get it to properly display in telnet mode? Just a > legible character interface -- not garbled all over the telnet screen? Pick another terminal emulation. Some telnet in windows are plain bad. Moving to vt100 emulation gene

Re: named, linuxconf, .sh scripts

2000-01-14 Thread tom minchin
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 09:19:04PM -0700, Paul R. Watkins wrote: > > I'm having 4 continuing problems with my RH6.1 install. > > 1. named does not automatically execute on reboot. I have to do this manually > /usr/sbin/named not a big deal and I could tie this into a script but isn't > this sup

Re: named caching

1999-12-28 Thread Vidiot
>On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Vidiot wrote: > >> Other than rebooting, how to I clear out the named cache? I am running >> the stock RH6.0 /etc/named.conf. > >/etc/rc.d/init.d/named restart >LLaP >bero Actually, "ndc restart" is best. MB -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bart: Hey, why is it destroying

Re: named caching

1999-12-28 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Vidiot wrote: > Other than rebooting, how to I clear out the named cache? I am running > the stock RH6.0 /etc/named.conf. /etc/rc.d/init.d/named restart LLaP bero -- Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM. -- Bill Gates, 1983 Windows 98 requires 16 MB

Re: named caching

1999-12-26 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> Other than rebooting, how to I clear out the named cache? I am running > the stock RH6.0 /etc/named.conf. > > Of course, I would prefer an option other than rebooting :-) Restart named. The cache is in memory only, so a restart will clear it. > > Happy Holidays. > > MB > --

Re: named caching

1999-12-25 Thread Michael Ghens
/usr/sbin/ndc restart or /etc/rc.d/init.d/named restart should do the trick On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Vidiot wrote: > Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 00:03:18 -0600 (CST) > From: Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: named caching > Resent-Date: 25 Dec 1

Re: named caching

1999-12-24 Thread Vidiot
>On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 12:03:18AM -0600, Vidiot wrote: >> Other than rebooting, how to I clear out the named cache? I am running >> the stock RH6.0 /etc/named.conf. >> >> Of course, I would prefer an option other than rebooting :-) >> > >ndc restart should do the trick. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: named caching

1999-12-24 Thread tom minchin
On Sat, Dec 25, 1999 at 12:03:18AM -0600, Vidiot wrote: > Other than rebooting, how to I clear out the named cache? I am running > the stock RH6.0 /etc/named.conf. > > Of course, I would prefer an option other than rebooting :-) > ndc restart should do the trick. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To un

Re: named on aliased IPs?

1999-12-20 Thread Nate Waddoups
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, JWalsh wrote: > Within each named.conf the global options 'directory', 'listen-on', > and 'pid-file' should each be uniquely defined: > > named.conf1: > options { directory "/var/named1"; listen-on { 1.2.3.4; }; pid-file > "named1.pid"; }; Most excellent. The 'listen-on' op

Re: named on aliased IPs?

1999-12-18 Thread JWalsh
Yup, Either way will work. By default named binds to all interfaces. If you want multiple instances of named on separate interfaces then they each must have separate named.conf files. Within each named.conf the global options 'directory', 'listen-on', and 'pid-file' should each be uniquely define

Re: named

1999-11-17 Thread fherman
I can also recommend the book "DNS and Bind" by Albitz & Lin. It's an O'Reilly & Associates pub. It's well written. Fred Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote: > > Hello Nhoel Naguit, > > Once you wrote about "named": > > > > There's somebody here that can able to teach me how to configure the > >

Re: named

1999-11-17 Thread Leonid Mamtchenkov
Hello Nhoel Naguit, Once you wrote about "named": > > There's somebody here that can able to teach me how to configure the > named. > Have you tried reading /usr/doc/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO before? ... -- Best regards, Leonid Mamtchenkov E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quote : Avoid the Fortran

Re: named

1999-11-17 Thread Michael Gatti
nhoel there's a lot to learn if you just read the man pages. I started out reading the HOWTO's on DNS (found at linux.org) http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO.html and it helped me out a lot, then moved on to other doc's that are on internet take a look at http://www.isc.org/products/BIND

Re: named

1999-11-17 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Nhoel Naguit wrote: > There's somebody here that can able to teach me how to configure the > named. Yes, it's called the Linux Documentation Project. Find it at: http://www.redhat.com/mirrors/LDP/search.html -- Todd A. Jacobs Network Systems Engineer --

Re: Named for an Intranet

1998-06-17 Thread Casey Bralla
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998 12:27:56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi Guy's, >need some help with my home network, specifically named.. > Great how to at "www.dns.net/dnsrd/docs/basic/txt". I got my DNS system working for my home intranet. -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata an

RE: Named for an Intranet

1998-06-16 Thread Joseph Doran
Setup a bogus domain say bogus.org on your linux machine. Put entries in this server for warbird1, warbird2 etc etc and your server. Configure named to act as a forwarder and give your isps dns addresses. Configure your 95 boxes to point to bogus named. Therefore any dns lookups Will happen local

Re: Named problems

1998-04-02 Thread Fred Leeflang
hehe, perhaps you need to put a line 'FILES=512' in your config.sys ? On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Nick Koston wrote: > I keep getting these errors when I restart/start named. It seems > only to work when the system is just starting up and then go balistic > adter it has booted completely. My gues