Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago)
The current version of RHEL 6 is RHEL 6.8. 6.3 is several years old and
some very important vulnerabilities have been fixed since then, most
notably one named Shellshock.
I am confused how mails are getting delivered since SMARTHOST
At 11:06 10/16/2003, you wrote:
My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
At the moment it's just a test box while I get used to the OS. I have
been tasked with setting up a webserver with mail support. I have been
using LAMP for a while so I am quite happy with that, but SendMail is
still a mystery.
Donald,
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The only problem with giving Red Hat $60 now for RHN is that Red Hat
Linux 9 is only supported through the end of April. You might be better
off buying Red Hat Professional Workstation for $82 (buy.com) which
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
At 13:02 10/16/2003, you wrote:
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to sendmail...why
not exim?
Postfix has been mentioned as well. I have not discussed Exim simply
because I have no knowledge of it. In the same vein, Courier
(www.courier-mta.org) is another option, that
At 06:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
Big man Ed speak truth. Buy beer for Ed, take Ed's advice.
Um, my name's Ed too, my advice, don't bet on Grey Lady in the fifth.
Now where's my beer?
Virtual beer. grin Cheers!
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL
At 08:08 10/17/2003, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Edward Croft wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:16, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Rodolfo needs to change the attrition like. Ed Croft is trying to steal
my beer!
Sorry, Eudora does not have a way
Webmin is your friend. http://www.webmin.com
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know
The closest you'll get I think is webmin.
-Original Message-
From: Donald Tyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SendMail GUI
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since I
know almost
Donald Tyler wrote:
Hi,
I have been asked to get a mail server up and running quickly, and since
I know almost nothing of Sendmail I really need a GUI to do that.
Can anyone recommend something?
If not, can someone point me in the direction of a quick start guide? I
have a book that I am
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on the
qmail list and that friends don't force
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John Nichel
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SendMail GUI
Donald Tyler wrote:
Hi
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I would suggest qmail.
http://www.qmail.org
I would argue that friends don't let friends get bullied and beaten on
the qmail list and
Donald Tyler wrote:
Thanks for the tip,
Does it come with a GUI? Or can I get one from somewhere?
It doesn't come with one, but Webmin is good for it.
http://www.webmin.com/
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SendMail GUI
At 09:58 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Friends don't let friends use Sendmail. There are other (read better)
alternatives to Sendmail, and I
At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a user
and a fair shake as a sysadmin... and qmail, qmail-users, and several
individual
You could put linuxconf on and get sendmail
(including users) going within minutes. linuxconf includes a GUI, TUI, and
web interface.
If you decided to go the linuxconf route, you'll
want to install:
http://vimap.sourceforge.net/first.
-eric wood
- Original Message -
From:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:06:24PM -0500, Donald Tyler wrote:
My system is Red Hat Linux 9.
I am willing to try anything. The most important this is security, and
then speed/ease of configuration. I need to get this server up and build
our clients website before the end of the month. Fun
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a
user and a fair shake as a sysadmin... and qmail,
And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
At 11:18 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The general argument I've heard and happen to agree with is that if you
are already a sendmail expert or have access to one, continue with
sendmail. However, if you're just starting out, go with Postfix.
I've heard this argument many times but cannot yet provide an
It seems only qmail has been mentioned as an alternative to
sendmail...why not exim?
Although (ahem) I have no personal experience with Exim, several
engineer-friends who worked at extremely large installations (hundreds
of dns servers, internal routers, etc.) all mentioned Exim as what I
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:46:46PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
Nothing on Earth (certainly no software product) can ever be counted on to
be 100% secure. Take Ed's advice, and make sure that all your software is
adequately kept patched and up-to-date. In this case, although there are
ways
At 13:12 10/16/2003, you wrote:
The only problem with giving Red Hat $60 now for RHN is that Red Hat
Linux 9 is only supported through the end of April. You might be better
off buying Red Hat Professional Workstation for $82 (buy.com) which
includes a year of RHN. More bang for the buck in my
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 12:39, Donald Tyler wrote:
And now I see perfectly the fanaticism behind each MTA.
Thank you for all your suggestions, try to play nice OK?
No kidding.
See what happens when you have to run a mail server? Are you sure you
want to get one going?
Bret
--
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 10:53 10/16/2003, you wrote:
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
I disagreed vehemently with the suggestion. I am very competent as a user
and a fair shake as a
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
friends don't force friends to patch and recompile just to prove they
have hair on their chest
But friends will let friends use the number 5 Most Critical Internet
Security Threat
I must say I find this sadistic.
Get off your soapbox. I offered an alternative suggestion, and even
warned him of the qmail mailing list.
friends don't force friends to patch and recompile just to prove they
have hair on their chest
But friends will let friends use the number 5 Most
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:36, Cornelius Klbel wrote:
But friends will let friends use the number 5 Most Critical Internet
Security Threat (http://www.sans.org/top20/top10.php)?
Wow, do you believe in statistics?
I think sendmail is on rank 6 at the moment, since it is used that often.
Karthikeyan Sankaran wrote:
Hi,
I am Karthik from India. I have a problem which i am seeing in most sendmail/fetchmail servers. May be someone faced this problem(Mail looping problem )before. Problem is, say i have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as pop3 ids and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my
- Original Message -
From: David Barkman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail or Postfix
Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
opinions on mail servers.
I'm sure Sendmail will have all the
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:08:17PM -0700, David Barkman wrote:
Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
opinions on mail servers. I'm sure Sendmail will have all the
features I could ever dream of needing, but it's complexity is a bit
frightening. I have the book
Hi Helgi,
--- Helgi Örn Helgason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On
2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi,
I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
modify the standard delivery of mail from:
/var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
to the
/home/mail
directory. I want to do
On 2003-09-27, Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi,
I'm using sendmail on RH8. What I'd like to do is
modify the standard delivery of mail from:
/var/spool/mail/$USERNAME
to the
/home/mail
directory. I want to do this as it will help in quota
setup.
I've thought of the easiest
In my opinion mutt command works better for sending
mail with attatchment using shell script then
sendmail. I tried to send attatchment using sendmail
didn't work for me!
mutt -s test -a /root/.bashrc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/root/greetings
--- Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:18
Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
Um...sort of.
Look in /etc/postfix/aliases. There is a line that by default reads
root:postfix
The comment specifically states that you have
Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
They already have. It's called postfix. :)
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:05, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
Any idea when Redhat is going to come up with rpms for this?
http://www.sendmail.org/8.12.10.html
This has already been filed in Bugzilla as Bug 104563.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104563
The associated RHSA is
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
cannot remember how to do it.
If its plain text then just
cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
else you want to look at uuencoding it then cat'ing it
Rus
--
w:
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
cannot remember how to do it.
If its plain text then just
cat filename | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I new there was an animal
That may not work as you expect if file filename is something other
than text. You may want to consider something like:
uuencode filename filename | mail -s File from script emailaddr
The file will have to be uudecoded at the receiving end but it should
make it intact.
I believe
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:18:08PM -0400, David Hart wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
cannot remember how to do it.
If its plain text then just
On 20:18 17 Sep 2003, David Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:41, Rus Foster wrote:
| On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Hart wrote:
| I seem to recall there's a way to send a file from a shell script but
| cannot remember how to do it.
|
| If its plain text then just
|
|
Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Skensved wrote:
I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
something which looks like a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kelerion
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sendmail - splitting outgoing mail to 2
recipients
I just re-read what I wrote.. lets try again :)
eg: person
Forgive me if I misunderstood your goal, but I believe that in your
example you want everything person (b) receives to also go to person
(c). Is this correct?
If so, this is how I accomplish that:
1. Set up a virtmap: [EMAIL PROTECTED] personb-cc
2. Set up an alias: personb-cc: personb, personc
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
Hi redhat-list,
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
[EMAIL
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
On Monday 15 September 2003 09:53, Nick White wrote:
Hi redhat-list,
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White
wrote:
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits
between
our internal
mail
I'm already doing the same as that.. but thats for -incoming- mail..
I'm talking about -outgoing- mail..
say for example you wanted a setup where all outgoing mail from a
company was auto-cc'd to someone else who monitored that all outgoing
mail from that company was company related..
hope that
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White wrote:
I have a quick sendmail question. A server sits between our internal
mail server, and the external world that acts as a mail receiver and
relay box. We do this using the mailertable file. So any mail for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gets
, September 15, 2003 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: sendmail blocking
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed
Wilts
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sendmail blocking
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Nick White
wrote:
I have
At 00:22 9/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Shorewall is setup to only allow ports 53, 80, 25, 123, 443
FYI, on the Shorewall site, in the contrib directory, there is a very
simply Mini-HOWTO I wrote on using Portsentry in combination with Shorewall
to dynamic, real-time blocking of Bad People [tm] who
At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
[snippage]
Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
that list for every request anyway, which is not what you want. Simply set
the reverse DNS
Bret Hughes wrote:
[snip]
The first question I have is how can I get sendmail to use the name
mail1 instead of webserver1.
I was able to fix (workaround ) an error reported by dnsreport.com
where it said that the host name in the greeting was not the same as
that reported in dns
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 06:19, Cowles, Steve wrote:
Bret Hughes wrote:
[snip]
The first question I have is how can I get sendmail to use the name
mail1 instead of webserver1.
I was able to fix (workaround ) an error reported by dnsreport.com
where it said that the host name in the
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 05:17, Steve Phillips wrote:
At 00:00 8/09/2003 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
[snippage]
Maybe you can do it if reverse-round-robin-DNS exists, but so far as I
know it doesn't and, in any case, you would get any name at random from
that list for every request anyway,
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 01:00, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
At 00:22 9/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Shorewall is setup to only allow ports 53, 80, 25, 123, 443
FYI, on the Shorewall site, in the contrib directory, there is a very
simply Mini-HOWTO I wrote on using Portsentry in combination with
On Monday 08 September 2003 14:06, Joe Polk wrote:
Does anyone know if in 7.3 if sendmail is compiled in the rpm with
libmilter support? I'm trying to get spamass-milter working and I
have it all setup (so I think) but nothing is filtering.
JAV
Mine wasn't ...
12:29:31 # sendmail -bt
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Jeff Lacki wrote:
My question is, is it better to use the Redhat RPM's for sendmail
and just setup the config's or is it better to download the sendmail
suite from www.sendmail.org and go from there?
Stick with Red Hat's rpm, if you've never compiled and setup sendmail
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 01:35, Jeff Lacki wrote:
Hello-
Im new to setting up sendmail (relatively). I tried it on my
Solaris box so Im a *little* familiar with it all.
[snip]
Res gave you some very good tips and instructions, but I'd like to
suggest one small (but very important) piece of
Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
these days, is such a concern on the internet.
Ive been a software engineer for years, and have done some sysadmin
stuff on and off. I have the book, Linux 7 unleashed (older
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:41, Jeff Lacki wrote:
Yes, please give me the resources to look at or purchase.
Im very concerned over security issues as security, especially
these days, is such a concern on the internet.
These are all free resources found on the Linux Documentation Project
homepage.
Thank youI completely agree as well.
Jeff
--
Above all, my brothers, do not swear--not by heaven or by earth or by
anything else. Let your Yes be yes, and your No, no, or you will be
condemned.
- James 5:12 (NIV)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:35:06PM -0700, Jeff Lacki wrote:
Secondly..I saw some postings on google talking about never ever opening
up port 25 and just using port 110 (pop3). I want to setup a web server
and sendmail on it. I Need port 25, correct? If I want to email anyone
that is ;) And
Can you copy/paste the bounce back message? It should be very useful in
trouble shooting your problem.
James Williams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jesse Millan
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Thanks for the reply, I found the problem though.
system-calls.com - 12.224.173.233
mail.system-calls.com - 12.224.173.223
system-calls.com and mail.system-calls.com are the same computer. There
was an error entering the IP address for mail.system-calls.com, one
digit off. Boy, I cant believe
I think you have to check your mail/access file for deny RELAY
Good luck
Winan
- Original Message -
From: Redhat Man [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:45 AM
Subject: Sendmail, Security
Dear All,
I am using MTA sendmail 8.12.6 in my
and save
yourself a lot of time.
JAV
-- Original Message ---
From: Winanjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:40:22 +0700
Subject: Re: Sendmail, Security
I think you have to check your mail/access file for deny RELAY
Good luck
Winan
It looks like the server choked on the rest of my message. It just
showed that the mail was accepted:
250 2.0.0 h832egkv004264 Message accepted for delivery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (h832egkv004264 Message accepted for
delivery)
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:45, Jesse Millan wrote:
I am trying to
On Sunday 31 August 2003 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i am hoping that someone may have developed a sendmail rule for the
following case:
i use ximian and have several e-mail addresses/indentities. when i
send mail to certain addresses, the destination mail server refuses
mail
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
times out. If you look at /var/log/messages you *should* see
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
times out. If you look at /var/log/messages you *should* see
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:56, Didier Casse wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if you like) until the dns query
times out.
On 29 Aug 2003, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:56, Didier Casse wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I remember that it's a hostname problem (more precisely a name
resolving issue). If sendmail can't contact the configured dns server to
resolve your hostname, it will wait (hang if
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:35, Didier Casse wrote:
If you fixed /etc/hosts, and /etc/resolv.conf then I've no clue! It's
because of problems like this configuration headaches with sendmail that I
decided to switch to qmail! When a friend told me to switch to qmail, I
was very hesitant about it
I had tye same problem on RH8. I solved that by modifying the hostname to a
fully qualified one.
Example: hostname linus2 - sendmail slow
hostname linus2.quest.uk - sendmail fast
try to modify your hostname, it worked for me
Felix
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:35, Didier Casse wrote:
If you fixed /etc/hosts, and /etc/resolv.conf then I've no clue! It's
because of problems like this configuration headaches with sendmail
that I decided to switch to qmail! When a friend told me to switch
to qmail, I was
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:00, Cowles, Steve wrote:
After reading this entire thread, my reply is probably to late. But...
type: sendmail -bt -d0.1 /dev/null
WHACK
I'm going to give this a shot tomorrow morning as I'm re-cabling the
network; can't hurt, and appreciate the info...ta mate!
--
Hey all,
I have these errors showing up in my logwatch report (regarding postfix):
SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon MTA: cannot bind: Address
already in use: 22 Time(s)
daemon MTA: problem creating SMTP socket: 22 Time(s)
DSN: Return receipt: 2 Time(s)
SYSERR(root):
Gerry Doris wrote:
It looks like you're trying to run more than one sendmail daemon. I've
seen similar errors when people run sendmail as a standalone daemon and
also try and call sendmail indirectly from an application like
MailScanner. I suggest you check all your mail related programs and
Found the solution from Simon
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2002-January/016541.html
To fix this you will need to tinker with
/usr/share/sendmail-cf/cf/redhat.mc and look for:
dnl This changes sendmail to only listen on the loopback device 127.0.0.1
dnl and not on any other
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:37:24PM -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to allow sendmail to authenticate against
another source? E.g Radius, AD, LDAP
Please try some basic Google searches using search strings like:
sendmail authentication radius
sendmail
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:03, Mark Haney wrote:
It may seem like this is the wrong place to post, but I think the issue
is with sendmail. I'm trying to setup Mailman for a small mailing list
for our county school system. Mailman itself seems to work, I can
subscribe from the web page, and I
Mark Haney wrote:
It may seem like this is the wrong place to post, but I think the
issue is with sendmail. I'm trying to setup Mailman for a small
mailing list for our county school system. Mailman itself seems to
work, I can subscribe from the web page, and I get an email
confirming the
3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
Jason and Steve, I think you are right on allowing relaying through
localhost. I bet that's exactly why I can
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
Jason and Steve, I think you are right on allowing relaying
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
3) When you telnet to your system, where are you telnetting from? By
default, the redhat supplied access file should allow relaying from
e-mail sumitted locally. i.e. localhost.
Jason and Steve, I think you are right on
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:16, Mark Haney wrote:
I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one of
those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
/usr/bin/newaliases just in case and
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:44, Mark Haney wrote:
snip
I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one of
those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 09:16, Mark Haney wrote:
I really don't get it. It's beyond bizarre, but then I'm having one
of those weeks. Okay, here's the situation. Jason, you are right, I
think. I checked the /etc/aliases file and it looked fine. I re-ran
Mark Haney wrote:
I just tested my hotmail account, and I can reply to the confirm
message by email to confirm the membership. But it does not send me
a copy of my list message to the hotmail account. I do however get
the message sent to my home account just fine. That must be the spam
Cowles, Steve wrote:
What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Haney wrote:
Cowles, Steve wrote:
What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
Cowles, Steve wrote:
What does /var/log/maillog show for delivery to your hotmail accout?
Is your mail being delivered and then filtered at hotmail -or- is
hotmail rejecting the connection attempt from your MTA?
Aug 1 12:13:42 pcweb sendmail[5495]: h71GDbkX005491:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Gerry Doris wrote:
I believe the only way around this is to have your mail server
authenticate with the hotmail server. You might be able to use
sendmail's access database for this. I do this for some server I
send to.
Gerry
Can you show/tell me how to get started on that? Web page
Gerry Doris wrote:
That's exactly what I get when my daughter tries to send a message to
hotmail from my server with a hotmail return address. They accept the
message and then dump it.
Could this be spam-filtering on the part of Hotmail? It's not uncommon
for spam factories to use bogus or
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Mark Haney wrote:
Gerry Doris wrote:
I believe the only way around this is to have your mail server
authenticate with the hotmail server. You might be able to use
sendmail's access database for this. I do this for some server I
send to.
Gerry
Can you
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Eric Chevalier wrote:
Gerry Doris wrote:
That's exactly what I get when my daughter tries to send a message to
hotmail from my server with a hotmail return address. They accept the
message and then dump it.
Could this be spam-filtering on the part of Hotmail? It's
1 - 100 of 1173 matches
Mail list logo
