Paul M wrote:
I was created a nat rule's equivalent filter rule and got the error
below. Is this a known bug?
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:149: rule label
too long (max 63 chars)pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not
loaded - The line in question reads
Michael Richardson wrote:
I’ve got a Realtek nic that is not playing nice with a cable-modem.
The System Log shows the interface is going up and down a couple times
per minute. I intend to replace the NIC (when I’m not 200 miles away),
but for now I’d like to try and for the speed/duplex to
Trave Harmon wrote:
I am having a problem:
I have multiple virtual mail servers behind a pfsense firewall. Now on
each server, I have multiple domains. Now sending to the domain from
google or yahoo is perfect and out again is perfect but when I send a
message from one virtual server to
Chris Bagnall wrote:
Greetings list,
Does anyone know if pfSense includes support for failover between two LAN
interfaces?
For example, one can provide high availability using CARP to create a virtual
router IP failing over between 2 pfSense boxes, but that's not going to solve
the problem
I have a document that describes in detail the steps required to
accomplish this, though not accessible right now. You're partially
right, partially wrong. I'll put it online somewhere later.
Bryan Derman wrote:
After searching the archives, the forum and conferring with Mr. Google,
I've
Bryan Derman wrote:
Thanks, but VLANs are not an option due to other hardware/switch
limitations.
Having only a basic understanding of VLANs, I'm also not sure how that
would apply (but would be happy to learn) since the underlying
objective is to have pfSense support multiple LAN subnets
Paul M wrote:
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/#FreeBSD
this has some recommendations for setting options in freebsd to improve
network performance; I don't know whether it's current wisdom though.
We do tweak some of that, but almost none of it is applicable to a
firewall
Paul M wrote:
Ngawang Sangye wrote:
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:191: rule label
too long (max 63 chars) pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not
loaded - The line in question reads [191]: pass in quick on $wan proto {
tcp udp } from any to { 192.168.2.58 }
Radio Tech wrote:
I just did a fresh install of 1.2-RC4 with the same results. I will try to
find my disk of 1.2 RC3 and try that. Is there something I am possibly
doing wrong.
I can assure you that changing versions isn't going to fix it, there
haven't been any CP issues in a long time.
Radio Tech wrote:
Hey Chris, Thanks for taking the time for this. When i say it doesn't work,
i mean all internet traffic goes though without authorization. It skips the
CP page. I was just trying to solve the problem. I tried it on a fresh
install without blocking anything on the LAN rules.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 2/23/08, Odd Kåre Qvam Trøen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
Does anyone know if I can consider v1.2 as fully released now?
Look here: http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/ and
Jure Pečar wrote:
Hello,
I rushed to 1.2 as many others did I presume ;)
Indeed, the one mirror out of 11 that I have checked stats on has seen
4,000 downloads in the first 24 hours.
I'm running 1.0-RELEASE on my home fw (simple adsl and two subnets). And I
am not able to upgrade it
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 2/27/08, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
1. fetch the upgrade file
fetch
http://files.pfsense.org/mirror/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-RELEASE.tgz
2. Run the upgrade command
/etc/rc.firmware pfSenseupgrade pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-RELEASE.tgz
Paul M wrote:
http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=66Itemid=71
the unsubscribe email address is incorrect in the href for
support-unsubscribe, it's the same as the subscribe one!
Fixed, thanks!
Matt Hohman wrote:
Hey All got a weird one for you all,
We have a pfsense box with 4 interfaces
Lan 192.168.0.1
Wan Static Public IP
Wan2 Static Public IP Different ISP than Wan
DMZ
Wan2 and DMZ are bridged.
Wan handles all traffic form the lan.
We have 3 remote pfsense boxes that use
Tunge2 wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading to release 1.2 of PFsense we are not able to set up
any IPsec connection anymore. No errors in the logs of Pfsense. But
wenn i put the upgrade (PFsense 1.2 RC3) over the not working 1.2
version, it all works again.? So why doesn't the IPsec tunnels
Tim Nelson wrote:
Hello! I have an IPSEC tunnel configured between a mobile client running TheGreenBow and a fresh installation of pfSense 1.2-RELEASE. The tunnel comes up as expected yet I am unable to ping any devices on the remote subnet. There is not a firewall tab for rules on IPsec tunnels.
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Has anyone else attempted to install pfsense on a Dell 6450? booting
from the CD in normal mode it will freeze durring hardware lookup and
booting with ACPI turned off it gets a kernel trap 12 error almost
immediately.
Google found a suggestion from someone to enable OS
RB wrote:
I may be mistaken but I though pfSense only supported 1 DHCP
connection on the WAN
It was my understanding that only the interface designated 'WAN' could
do PPPoE, but the others in a multi-WAN setup could do DHCP or static.
That is correct. There are at least a couple people
Anil Garg wrote:
Now that the broadband is very reliable, why would anyone use more
than one WAN at home. What are the benefits you have seen or desired
in multiple dhcp wan at home.
Very reliable depends on your provider, your definition of reliable,
and even more, your tolerance for
Bryan Derman wrote:
I see how multiple WANs from different providers (assuming they use
different link-level sources and/or technology) can provide backup for
outgoing access, but I haven't figured out how this can help for incoming
access to servers.
I.E., let's say I have 2 WAN connections
Michael Richardson wrote:
I'm hoping the log entries below will help because I'm not familiar
with tcpdump yet (spoiled GUI user where packet-capturing is concerned).
go to a command line (enable SSH if you haven't already or do it at the
actual console), and run:
tcpdump -i fxp0 -s
Ngawang Sangye wrote:
I would try that but if you have an upper limit set on all traffic - I
assume that LAN to LAN will be limted to that speed (2 Mbit for us).
Thats what I experience, and slower because of all the internet
traffic competing to the point of unusable connections to local
Bill Marquette wrote:
Not sure on hardware, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if
boards as low powered as the new pcengines ALIX boards could do 14mbit
encrypted (that's really not alot of traffic).
I've heard from people who have tested ALIX hardware to max out at about
10 Mbps
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
I can install FreeBSD on it with zero issue. don't even have to
disable ACPI.
pfsense freezes right after it sees the raid array as a viable HDD.
Interesting, not what I would have suspected. Can you try booting
FreeSBIE 2.0.1 on that box?
Angelo Turetta wrote:
But by now, only ipfilter can take advantage of this nonstandard
extension when doing NAT (don't know about Linux's iptables).
It does exist, but apparently doesn't work in ipfilter. Manuel tried it
for inclusion in m0n0wall and said it didn't work, and if anybody
Radio Tech wrote:
Hello all. I am looking for some information. I need to implement a
wireless connection using VPN access. I am kinda green on VPN and really
dont know the way to go. The kicker is, it need to be able to support up
to 300 user and have the ability to intergrate with
Ryan Rodrigue wrote:
Chris, Thanks for the reply. Will PPTP work with MS Active Directory? I
was kinda thinking it would using radius.
Yes, with IAS.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Scott Ullrich wrote:
None of us have the time and or patience to maintain a freebsd port.
Since we replace the /etc/rc system with PHP that would hardly be a
good idea.
Plus a few kernel patches, a custom kernel config, and it would have to
install numerous other ports. It would be a huge
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Two things I’ve noticed in pfSense 1.2 release:
1. The subnet mask in the scope settings for DHCP keeps reverting back
to “32”. At one point, the DHCP server would not start until I went
through all of my DHCP scopes (3 interfaces) and reset the subnet
masks
Anil Garg wrote:
I am reading the m0n0wall documentation (its so well written - kudos
to the author)
What, you specifically buttering me up to get a response? ;)
There is a pointer that for many public addresses to be mapped to
servers inside, m0nowall specifies that Server NAT should
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
** http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1155 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008
16:35:11 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Trouble installing on old Dell 6450
On 3/19/08, Sean Cavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just find it
Eric Baenen wrote:
As I said before - all is working fine - except: when doing rsync's
over ssh/scp from the lab machines to the services core, I'm seeing a
maximum sustained throughput of around 60Mbps. With gigabit end to
end - even with the AES encryption overhead of the OpenVPN
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If I wanted to display a user’s IP address AND MAC address on the
captive portal page, does anyone have a code snippet that would do
that on the pfSense captive portal page? Is this possible?
I suggest opening a feature request ticket on cvstrac.pfsense.org,
and/or
Kelvin Chiang wrote:
Hi, I am seeing a phenomenon, that a single captive portal login
triggered 2 accounting sessions, did anyone see this before?
Not that I've heard of. If it's something you can consistently
replicate, please open a ticket at cvstrac.pfsense.org.
Please see the following post for more information.
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=182
Hope to see you there!
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Dills wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 3/23/08, Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rl2: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 29807 max 1514)
That is a rather large packet?Jumbo frames?
Nope, that's what has me confused. This is
Tim Nelson wrote:
I have not tried the full install without ACPI yet. However, I did use the
Uniprocessor kernel when I tried a full install previously.
You might want to try the SMP kernel if disabling ACPI doesn't work,
though IIRC the embedded kernel is uniprocessor so I somewhat doubt
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 16:54, Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
As Adam said - it should. It depends on the specifics of your
traffic though. We had an installation that was
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
The pfSense box (1.0-RC3 still) in front of the colo servers that host
the project's websites is a WRAP. It pushes around 2-8 Mb at around
10-25% utilization, we can push it up over 20 Mbps outbound
Michel Servaes wrote:
pfSense won't start... BSD itself starts just fine, but a little later
on it asks for the boot device...
BIOS senses the drive correctly, the BSD menu comes up, and then a
little bit of text passes by (I am a n00b at BSD things), and further
on asks me to supply boot
RB wrote:
If you check the CVS timeline, you'll notice Scott has been quietly
adding PPP support with direct references to using cellular links.
I added it actually. But it's far from being finished.
I'm guessing it won't be available as a supported option for 1.2, but
it just might be
Randy Schultz wrote:
Ah. Now I remember why I used the LAN i'face instead of the WAN i'face -
because the WAN is DHCP only whereas with the LAN I can set the static
address.
You can configure a static IP on the WAN. In fact you have to configure
the IP on the WAN in this case, because that's
Randy Schultz wrote:
Oi lads and lasses,
Does anybody know what is the preferred method to delete SSH keys? I
have
checked to make sure hosts cannot gain access via SSH, then added keys
for a
coupla hosts, clicked save, checked(yup, they can now access), removed
the
keys via the webUI, but
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Hi,
can anybody recommend a switch (8 port or so) that is VLAN capable
(and the VLANs actually work with pfSense)?
Any switch that supports VLANs with 802.1q trunking (when properly
configured) will work with pfSense. I've used multiple Cisco, HP,
Netgear, 3Com and
lartc wrote:
hi all,
i have inherited two sites that need to be connected with an ipsec
tunnel -- issue is that each lan on each side of the tunnel is identical
rfc1918 address space (172.16.16.0/16).
is there a way to overcome this with nat
There will be in 1.3, but isn't now. Still I
Andy Dills wrote:
Good news, it appears my assumption was correct. There exists a flaw in
the realtek chipset (as quoted earlier in the thread), and it appears
that a patch to the driver has been created:
http://www.nabble.com/RELENG_7-panic-td16285669.html
that is good news. Do you know
David Cavanaugh wrote:
Thanks so far for all the info.
But using WebDAV (port 80) instead of FTP would circumvent this limitation,
correct?
Correct. Using any file transfer mechanism other than the NAT-b0rk FTP
will work around this, including SCP, WebDAV (though that makes me
cringe a
Ermal Luçi wrote:
What's wrong with only in rules?!
You can do the same blocking as you would do with out and just save
your computer from blocking the packet after traversing the whole
machine!
The interface it's blocked on is relatively irrelevant. You can do
anything with only in
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 06:29:23PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Not currently. This is a feature in HEAD that will be back-ported at
some point. 1.3 has an alias import feature where you can paste a
C/R separated
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I've piped up many times regarding embedded upgrades...
You've had worse luck than anybody on this topic. :)
I've been using the FreeNAS software (also in embedded version), which is
also derived from
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Olivier Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello...
Since the situation has not improved, I'm re-posting this :-(
If you have any idea what I could/should try, it would be very nice...
At the moment I have about 3-4 disconnects per day, and according to the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Fabio C Flores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havent got all settings for the other end (3rd party). Is there any
specific option I should look at?
Not really, you need to get all the configuration details from the
other end, and make sure they aren't using any
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Anders Dahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one machine and 3 xdsl-connections. I want each of them being a
gateway for it's own LAN. Shouldn't that be possible!?
Sure.
I have succesfully created multiple WANs with one LAN, and thougt that it
would be just
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Dimitri Rodis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to have a 3-way CARP setup? I can't seem to find mention of
anyone having one up and running, so I just thought I would check to see if
there was any reason it wouldn't work…
Yeah, you can. The only catch
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Dimitri Rodis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So really the peer IP option is there for folks who don't have a
dedicated interface, so that the pfsync traffic doesn't flood the
network, is that right?
No, it's more for networks with switches that don't play nicely
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Dimitri Rodis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last thing:
Is there currently any way to *not* assign an IP directly to the WAN
interface in a CARP config?
No, not at this time.
Since the IPs assigned directly to the WAN can't be used in a failover
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Sebastián Veloso Varas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if some of you has had good experiences trying to
realize tunnels VPN IPSEC doing NAT-T (Transversal), since I was reading the
characteristics that the firewall supports and says that it
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David C P Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this capability already exists and I have just missed it...
Are there any plans to implement virtual wireless interfaces in pfSense,
thus allowing one to define multiple wireless networks that
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Tim Dickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally deploying captive portal at one of our new sites. But am coming
across a redirect issue I'm hoping you can shed some light on.
BACKGROUND:
I have 3 Wans setup - WAN, DSL, DSL2
I have 3 Lans setup - LAN, GUEST,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Anders Dahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris or anyone who will help me...
I have followed the instructions and have partly succeded.
This is my setup:
fxp1 = Lan (this is used for management only)
fxp0 holds the following:
vlan0 = Lan_1
vlan1 =
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Squid is not compatible with CP. This would have been helpful if you
told this up front :)
That's odd, I've been running it in transparent mode
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:57 PM, RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it does work, there might be some caveats though. Does it
cause the portal to be bypassed? I've never tried it myself.
Nope - typical behavior. Clients DHCP, hit the captive portal on the
CARP primary, and are
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Tim Dickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did state Squid was in there ;)
... I have squid setup with defaults (non transparent) on LAN ONLY I
have lightsquid installed for reporting
So, anything else to try? I'm willing to help the cause if you have any
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can connect to Worldwide and Regional events with Mario Kart, but I can't
connect to Friends.
Nintendo says they are different types of connections so connecting to
Worldwide and Regional events doesn't necessarily mean
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Tim Dickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I don't have squid running on the interface in question.
Squid is running on LAN and I want CP on LAN2.. does that make a difference?
No, Squid really isn't relevant here, it's the route-to rules and
their interaction
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Olivier Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short update about my issues:
Thanks for your feedback (and also to David). I couldn't try the
commands yet because the device was remote and people were working, but
I will keep them around in case the problems are
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created Ticket #1706 regarding the load-balancing issue. Does anyone have
an estimate of how long time before bugs are fixed? Could I do a workarround
meanwhile?
Not sure on a work around, but no bugs will get
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Jeppe Øland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not pretty much convinced that the RRD graphs going all NAN is
coused by more than one instance of updaterrd.sh running at the same
time.
You're not convinced? Or was that a typo?
Now the big question is how more
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Jeppe Øland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're not convinced? Or was that a typo?
Typo. I'm convinced.
Last time it happened, I had just moved the pfSense box from one
location to another (did a shutdown and turned it on in the new
location) ... the day
Paul Peziol wrote:
I think I just found the problem. Version 1.2- Release but under
Platform it says CD-ROM. I guess I assumed I installed it to the HD
and didnt pay attention to it. Is there a way to move it to the hd
without running the cd again and resetting up the config. or can I
just do
David Rees wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was it just me, or did [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s reply look empty?
It was.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
David Rees wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Rees wrote:
Was it just me, or did [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s reply look empty?
It was.
Thought so. ;-)
Anyone have any ideas on the ping_hosts.sh getting stuck and
apparently
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, attached is a patch to /etc/config.inc that makes sure that the
config.xml and config.cache is updated atomically. The patch adds a
function function write_safe_file with 3 arguments: $file, $content,
$force_binary.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that a floppy could boot, load a USB driver and hand over to
the USB device on these old machines? Any reason not? (Floppy disk
required!)
I was thinking of that - I seem to recall some kind of boot loader
that
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The older FreeBSD installations had a floppy boot disc, whether this could be
adapted I have wondered?
Not in this fashion, no.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Atkins, Dwane P wrote:
I am attempting to install pfSense on a Dell PowerEdge RS200 server.
This has a 64 bit ES4500 2.2 Ghz Processor with 1 GB memory and 80 gig
SATA hard drive.
The install goes so far and then I start getting ad4: and acd0 errors
(errors that occur on ad4 seem to
to reboot into safemode where we saw an issue with IRQ
6 which is the embedded SATA IRQ. However, it did allow to start the
install process of pfSense. I will try this tomorrow.
Thank you for all your help.
Dwane
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ease of setup is usually the reason. The main reason of the warning is
that it is possible to use PPTP with no or very weak encryption.
Sure, the issue isn't the output itself, it's the suggestion you run
PPTP over
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Jeremy Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for the help.
I've considered this, but once I've established a VPN connection, shouldn't
that put me on the LAN where the NAT firewall rules on the WAN don't apply?
Yes, it does. Only PPTP rules apply to PPTP
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Iarocci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll trade you that machine for one that works. ;-)
Seriously though, disable the ACPI in the bios. There was just a thread on
a similar problem yesterday. See here:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Diego A. Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How I can to write a nat rule in command line?
you don't.
you can manually edit config.xml, add the rule, remove the
config.cache and reload the filter rules but that's not suggested
since you could blow up your config.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Diego A. Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to write a nat rule for tun0 (VPN) interfase
Can I do it through config.xml?
I don't believe that's possible without at least some minor code
changes. 1.3 will allow NAT on OpenVPN interfaces but that's not
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Timo Schoeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I'm about to sell a bunch of pfSense-based Firewalls to a customer (who
wants to run a nice loadbalanced setup).
What about commercial support? bsdperimeter.com is down, as it seems to
me...
Thanks for the
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Harrie Bonenkamp (Colson)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which livecd should I download from development (pfsense1.2 –freebsd6.3)
http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/
pfSense.iso.gz
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Dean Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have a cron job of 15 * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate -u -s tick.usno.navy.mil
i did the command you said ntpdate pool.ntp.org. and yes it sets the time,
but it doesn't stay. for long.
computer kept near perfect time
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Dean Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i did ysctl -w kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 and after 33 minutes i was off
.04 seconds. better than 250 seconds.:)
Good to know! Thanks for reporting back.
2008/5/11 Michael Smirnov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello!
First of all, does pfSense support
- pptp vpn interfaces as WAN
Yes
- more than one(I need 8) pptp vpn interface as WAN
No.
Is there a workaround to connect all 8 pptp connections
from pfSense simultaneously?
Not a good one. 8
RB wrote:
1. If you MUST send an autoresponse, make sure you only send it if it
is DIRECTLY to you.
2. NEVER attach one of the stupid prove you are a human milters to it.
3. Exchange just doesn't cut it. Top-posting, autoresponders,
dim-witted filtering, HTML email...
4. And the [EMAIL
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on
FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said
that he experiences much less problem with wireless.
Yeah try this:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Jure Pečar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I solved office1 to office2 with openvpn, now I want to figure out the
problem between office1 and servers.
I monitored the ipsec logs on both pfsenses at the time when ssh session
freezes and nothing shows up in the
Only have time for a very quick reply, try:
http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Adam Costello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got a Dell R300 with a Intel Pro 1000VT Quad Gigabit NIC. I've got the
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Adam Costello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's good news and bad news.
Good news: That install fixed the issue with the Intel Pro 1000VT and when I
stick the cable link status says UP
Bad News: The onboard Broadcom NetXtreme Dual Gigabit NIC is not working.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 15.05.2008 um 20:55 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh:
for the record, VMWare tools is included in the ports collection
open-vm-tools from ports is the way to go. I have packages built for
pfSense, just need to put together
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
in /var/log/ the DHCP and portal auth logs are limited to 65535 octets. So I
can't read lot connections! Is it possible to bypass the limitation (without
syslog server) ?
That's the first I've heard of this. Can you be
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wade Blackwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one
being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I
pick one over the other? Thanks.
not sure, Scott would know. It's probably
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I have many connections, I can only see the last DHCP leases of the day.
But I must be able to visualize the connections up to 1 year.
Oh, you're talking about the log rotation. That wasn't evident to me
from your first message.
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Beat Siegenthaler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there the possibility to get a embedded version of
FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ ?
http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Olivier Mueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It worked about 5 days without problems, then it started again:
Try what I suggested previously:
---
Open up /etc/inc/interfaces.inc in Diagnostics - Edit, and go down to under:
set bundle disable multilink
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM, tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Tomorrow I'm going to update an embedded box from
1.2rc4 to the final 1.2.
How can I backup RRD graph data? I don't want to lost
statistics about traffic (sent/received data)
exchanged in these months and so on.
Is
301 - 400 of 1503 matches
Mail list logo
